All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sourceforge.net>,
	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
	Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se>,
	Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Who changed /proc/<pid>/ in 2.6.0-test5-bk9?
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 03:53:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031003025338.GA15089@mail.shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310021720510.7833-100000@home.osdl.org>

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> And it may or may not make sense to not have a "/proc/<nn>/task/<yy>/fd"
> directory at all if the thread shares file descriptors with the thread 
> group leader. That would be a fairly easy optimization.

If you make /proc/.../fd return the same inode numbers for the
identical file descriptor tables, that would be just as good for fuser
performance.

fuser would stat() each of the /proc/<nn>/task/<yy>/fd entries and see
that they're the same as the group leader.

It is the same number of operations as checking for the non-existence
of /proc/<nn>/task/<yy>/fd entries, but more flexible.

Alternatively you could make the task fd directories be symbolic
links to the group leader fd directory.

-- Jamie

  reply	other threads:[~2003-10-03  2:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-28  1:27 Linux 2.6.0-test6 Linus Torvalds
2003-09-28  7:03 ` Con Kolivas
2003-09-28 10:02   ` Rob Landley
2003-09-29  4:55     ` Nick Piggin
2003-09-29  7:35       ` Rob Landley
2003-09-29 16:55       ` Ed Sweetman
2003-09-30  0:03         ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-02  0:41         ` Pedro Larroy
2003-10-02  3:05           ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-02 19:07             ` Pedro Larroy
2003-10-03  0:07               ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-03 19:34                 ` Pedro Larroy
2003-09-29 18:45       ` bill davidsen
2003-09-30  1:12         ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-01 21:13           ` bill davidsen
2003-10-02  2:45             ` Nick Piggin
2003-09-28  8:26 ` Markus Hästbacka
2003-09-28 10:54   ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-28  8:59 ` keyboard repeat / sound [was Re: Linux 2.6.0-test6] Roger Luethi
2003-09-29 15:16   ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-30  7:50     ` Paul
2003-09-30 12:51       ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-30 13:21         ` Aristeu Sergio Rozanski Filho
2003-09-30 13:44           ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-30 14:05             ` Aristeu Sergio Rozanski Filho
2003-09-30 14:16               ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-10-01 23:51                 ` Aristeu Sergio Rozanski Filho
2003-09-30 18:16               ` Mark W. Alexander
2003-10-01 23:52                 ` Aristeu Sergio Rozanski Filho
2003-09-28 10:09 ` Linux 2.6.0-test6 Rafał 'rmrmg' Roszak
2003-09-28 11:05 ` Andreas Jellinghaus
2003-09-28 12:34   ` Dave Jones
2003-09-28 16:12     ` Andreas Jellinghaus
2003-09-28 17:51       ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-28 16:42 ` Ivan Gyurdiev
2003-09-28 20:26 ` [patch] 2.6.0-test6: correct hdlcdrv.h prototypes Adrian Bunk
2003-09-29 13:23 ` Linux 2.6.0-test6 Florin Iucha
2003-09-29 13:55   ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2003-09-29 14:01     ` Jaroslav Kysela
2003-09-29 14:18       ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2003-09-29 19:04         ` bill davidsen
2003-09-29 14:30       ` Takashi Iwai
2003-09-29 13:58   ` Jaroslav Kysela
2003-09-29 16:30 ` Linux 2.6.0-test6 (compile statistics) John Cherry
2003-09-29 17:44   ` Jesper Juhl
2003-10-06 20:39     ` John Cherry
2003-10-01  8:58 ` Who changed /proc/<pid>/ in 2.6.0-test5-bk9? Mikael Pettersson
2003-10-01 11:52   ` John Levon
2003-10-01 20:21     ` bill davidsen
2003-10-02  1:00       ` John Levon
2003-10-06  3:01         ` bill davidsen
2003-10-01 15:11   ` Linus Torvalds
2003-10-01 20:58     ` bill davidsen
2003-10-01 23:42     ` Albert Cahalan
2003-10-02  0:38       ` Linus Torvalds
2003-10-02  0:57         ` Albert Cahalan
2003-10-02  3:35     ` Ulrich Drepper
2003-10-02  4:12       ` Albert Cahalan
2003-10-02  4:58         ` Ulrich Drepper
2003-10-02 13:48           ` Albert Cahalan
2003-10-02 17:30             ` Ulrich Drepper
2003-10-03  0:03               ` Albert Cahalan
2003-10-03  0:40                 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-10-03  2:53                   ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2003-10-06  4:54                     ` Mike Fedyk
2003-10-06  2:52                   ` bill davidsen
2003-10-07 23:08                   ` Robert White
2003-10-07 22:46                 ` Robert White
2003-10-07 23:25                   ` Linus Torvalds
2003-10-08  0:41                     ` Robert White
2003-10-08  0:54                       ` Linus Torvalds
2003-10-08  2:31                         ` Robert White
2003-10-08  2:39                           ` David Lang
2003-10-08  2:59                             ` Robert White
2003-10-09 18:25                               ` bill davidsen
2003-10-08  2:47                           ` Who changed /proc/<pid>/ in 2.6.0-test5-bk9? (SIGPIPE?) Robert White
2003-10-08  2:57                             ` Linus Torvalds
2003-10-08  4:01                               ` Robert White
2003-10-08  4:08                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-10-08 10:47                         ` Who changed /proc/<pid>/ in 2.6.0-test5-bk9? bert hubert
2003-10-08 19:12                           ` Ulrich Drepper
2003-10-09 18:43                             ` bill davidsen
2003-10-08 21:54                           ` Robert White
2003-10-09 18:12                         ` bill davidsen
2003-10-10  4:39                           ` Jamie Lokier
2003-10-09 17:59                       ` bill davidsen
2003-10-11  3:02                       ` Here is a case that proves my previous position wrong regurading CLONE_THREAD and CLONE_FILES Robert White
2003-10-11  3:48                         ` viro
2003-10-12 11:41                         ` Jamie Lokier
2003-10-02  8:46       ` Who changed /proc/<pid>/ in 2.6.0-test5-bk9? Miquel van Smoorenburg
2003-10-02 22:35         ` Jamie Lokier
2003-10-02 23:43           ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2003-10-06  2:57         ` bill davidsen
2003-10-02  3:38     ` Ulrich Drepper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031003025338.GA15089@mail.shareable.org \
    --to=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=albert@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=drepper@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikpe@csd.uu.se \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.