From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [uml-devel] Re: uml 2.6.1 kbuild simplifications
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 12:40:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200401201740.i0KHeWDG003215@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 19 Jan 2004 08:34:05 +0100." <20040119073405.GA3175@elte.hu>
mingo@elte.hu said:
> The dual compilation space ('user code' and 'kernel code' compilation)
> within UML is not yet fully expressable via kbuild.
In my opinion, it doesn't need to be. BlaisorBlade and I have been having
an argument about it.
He thinks kbuild should support it.
I consider it to be an artifact of UML containing intermingled OS-dependent
and OS-independent code. With the OS-dependent code separated out into
arch/um/os, the rest of UML becomes nice, normal kernel code. The stuff
under arch/um/os is then pure userspace code, and I have no problem with
sticking some special CFLAGS mangler in the Makefile (or Makefiles) there.
Then, the code, and the special make magic that it needs are all in one
place, and we don't need to fiddle kbuild.
Jeff
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-20 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-13 5:05 uml-patch-2.6.0 Jeff Dike
2004-01-13 5:05 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 Jeff Dike
2004-01-13 5:18 ` uml-patch-2.6.0 Jeff Dike
2004-01-13 5:18 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 Jeff Dike
2004-01-13 10:19 ` uml-patch-2.6.0 Sven Köhler
2004-01-13 10:19 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 Sven Köhler
2004-01-13 18:55 ` Gerd Knorr
2004-01-16 2:33 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-16 10:03 ` M A Young
2004-01-16 11:42 ` Gerd Knorr
2004-01-17 16:10 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-01-16 17:27 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-16 21:56 ` Gerd Knorr
2004-01-17 21:12 ` M A Young
2004-01-18 4:47 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-16 23:47 ` Sven Köhler
2004-01-17 19:09 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-01-17 19:50 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-17 20:03 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-01-18 4:51 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-18 16:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-18 21:06 ` [uml-devel] uml 2.6.1 kbuild simplifications Ingo Molnar
2004-01-19 0:08 ` [uml-devel] " Jeff Dike
2004-01-19 7:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-20 17:40 ` Jeff Dike [this message]
2004-01-18 23:57 ` [uml-devel] Re: uml-patch-2.6.0 Jeff Dike
2004-01-19 7:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-19 8:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-20 0:19 ` M A Young
2004-01-20 0:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-20 0:41 ` M A Young
2004-01-23 21:52 ` [uml-devel] tt mode tls/glibc crash with 2.6 (Was: Re: uml-patch-2.6.0) M A Young
2004-01-23 23:52 ` [uml-devel] " M A Young
2004-01-24 12:25 ` M A Young
2004-01-24 18:20 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-24 19:31 ` M A Young
2004-01-28 11:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-05 12:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-05 12:45 ` M A Young
2004-02-05 13:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-05 13:28 ` M A Young
2004-02-05 18:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-05 19:15 ` M A Young
2004-02-05 19:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-05 19:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-05 19:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-06 7:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-20 1:27 ` [uml-devel] Re: uml-patch-2.6.0 Jeff Dike
2004-01-20 17:22 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-20 19:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-17 19:09 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 BlaisorBlade
2004-01-17 19:51 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-18 13:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-18 13:58 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.1-1: VFS: Cannot open root device "ubd0" or unknown-block(0, 0) Ingo Molnar
2004-01-18 14:04 ` [uml-devel] " Ingo Molnar
2004-01-18 23:48 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-17 20:32 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 M A Young
2004-01-19 17:06 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 Gerd Knorr
2004-01-20 19:42 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-01-20 21:30 ` Gerd Knorr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200401201740.i0KHeWDG003215@ccure.user-mode-linux.org \
--to=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.