All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: M A Young <m.a.young@durham.ac.uk>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>, Gerd Knorr <kraxel@bytesex.org>,
	user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Re: uml-patch-2.6.0
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 00:19:37 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0401200008240.6442@altair.dur.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040119082805.GA4412@elte.hu>

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Ingo Molnar wrote:

>
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> > > 2.4 UMLs work fine with these libcs.  I had been assuming (without any
> > > evidence) that there was some other capability check (like uname), and
> > > libc gets horribly confused when it sees a 2.6 kernel that doesn't
> > > have the thread_info stuff.
> >
> > ok, i talked to Ulrich, and it turns out that ld.so in Fedora uses the
> > set_tid_address() syscall to find out whether the kernel has NPTL or
> > not [and thus whether to use the TLS glibc or the standard one]. [...]
>
> unfortunately, this is only the case if the kernel is below 2.5.69 and
> has 'nptl' in the uname. Otherwise ld.so assumes full NPTL support.
>
> so the only compatible solution seems to be to implement
> set/get_thread_area() within UML. Since UML itself is linked statically,
> which causes the non-TLS glibc to be linked, i think it should be safe
> to just shadow the TLS descriptors in the UML process and call
> set_thread_area() for every new thread that has TLS descriptors not
> equal to the previous thread's TLS descriptors.

I have found in tt mode with an FC1 image the system hangs after 3
syscalls (uname, brk, open), before any set/get_thread_area calls, so I
suspect there is another problem. The hang consists of repeated segfault
signals with fault address (beffe018) which returns -EFAULT. Is there any
setup for tls/nptl normally done by the kernel that might be missing in
UML, such as allocating some high up memory?

	Michael Young


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2004-01-20  0:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-13  5:05 uml-patch-2.6.0 Jeff Dike
2004-01-13  5:05 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 Jeff Dike
2004-01-13  5:18 ` uml-patch-2.6.0 Jeff Dike
2004-01-13  5:18   ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 Jeff Dike
2004-01-13 10:19 ` uml-patch-2.6.0 Sven Köhler
2004-01-13 10:19   ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 Sven Köhler
2004-01-13 18:55   ` Gerd Knorr
2004-01-16  2:33     ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-16 10:03       ` M A Young
2004-01-16 11:42         ` Gerd Knorr
2004-01-17 16:10           ` BlaisorBlade
2004-01-16 17:27         ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-16 21:56           ` Gerd Knorr
2004-01-17 21:12           ` M A Young
2004-01-18  4:47             ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-16 23:47       ` Sven Köhler
2004-01-17 19:09       ` BlaisorBlade
2004-01-17 19:50         ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-17 20:03           ` BlaisorBlade
2004-01-18  4:51             ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-18 16:21       ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-18 21:06         ` [uml-devel] uml 2.6.1 kbuild simplifications Ingo Molnar
2004-01-19  0:08           ` [uml-devel] " Jeff Dike
2004-01-19  7:34             ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-20 17:40               ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-18 23:57         ` [uml-devel] Re: uml-patch-2.6.0 Jeff Dike
2004-01-19  7:53           ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-19  8:28             ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-20  0:19               ` M A Young [this message]
2004-01-20  0:23                 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-20  0:41                   ` M A Young
2004-01-23 21:52                   ` [uml-devel] tt mode tls/glibc crash with 2.6 (Was: Re: uml-patch-2.6.0) M A Young
2004-01-23 23:52                     ` [uml-devel] " M A Young
2004-01-24 12:25                       ` M A Young
2004-01-24 18:20                         ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-24 19:31                           ` M A Young
2004-01-28 11:35                             ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-05 12:30                             ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-05 12:45                               ` M A Young
2004-02-05 13:13                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-05 13:28                                   ` M A Young
2004-02-05 18:36                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-05 19:15                                   ` M A Young
2004-02-05 19:22                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-05 19:15                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-05 19:50                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-06  7:42                                       ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-20  1:27                 ` [uml-devel] Re: uml-patch-2.6.0 Jeff Dike
2004-01-20 17:22               ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-20 19:59                 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-17 19:09 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 BlaisorBlade
2004-01-17 19:51   ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-18 13:49     ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-18 13:58       ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.1-1: VFS: Cannot open root device "ubd0" or unknown-block(0, 0) Ingo Molnar
2004-01-18 14:04         ` [uml-devel] " Ingo Molnar
2004-01-18 23:48           ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-17 20:32   ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 M A Young
2004-01-19 17:06   ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 Gerd Knorr
2004-01-20 19:42     ` BlaisorBlade
2004-01-20 21:30       ` Gerd Knorr
2004-01-18 18:46 M A Young

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.GSO.4.58.0401200008240.6442@altair.dur.ac.uk \
    --to=m.a.young@durham.ac.uk \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=kraxel@bytesex.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.