* [Qemu-devel] benchmarks
@ 2004-02-20 8:34 Tom Musgrove
2004-02-20 12:09 ` Gabriel Ebner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tom Musgrove @ 2004-02-20 8:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
If you plan to update your benchmarks, I thought it might be nice to compare
to our commercial competetion on linux (and possibly other OSes).
Here is the download page for VMWare both Linux and Windows Versions
http://www.vmware.com/download/workstation.html
Here is the download page for twoOStwo both Linux and Windows Versions
http://www.twoostwo.org/
Here is the download page for Win4Lin - Linux Only?
http://www.netraverse.com/support/downloads/index.php
Here is the download page for VirtualPC - Windows Only?
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/virtualpc/downloads/trial.asp
Tom M
_________________________________________________________________
Watch high-quality video with fast playback at MSN Video. Free!
http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200365ave/direct/01/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] benchmarks
2004-02-20 8:34 [Qemu-devel] benchmarks Tom Musgrove
@ 2004-02-20 12:09 ` Gabriel Ebner
2004-02-28 0:56 ` James Boddington
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gabriel Ebner @ 2004-02-20 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Hello,
Am Fre, den 20.02.2004 schrieb Tom Musgrove um 09:34:
> If you plan to update your benchmarks, I thought it might be nice to compare
> to our commercial competetion on linux (and possibly other OSes).
Don't forget bochs. (I know its not commercial, but its AFAIK the only
viable free alternative to qemu)
Gabriel.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] benchmarks
2004-02-20 12:09 ` Gabriel Ebner
@ 2004-02-28 0:56 ` James Boddington
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: James Boddington @ 2004-02-28 0:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:09 pm, Gabriel Ebner wrote:
> Don't forget bochs. (I know its not commercial, but its AFAIK the only
> viable free alternative to qemu)
I have been playing a little bit with timing something representative of
what I have been doing. For this I timed building bash. This involved
fetching from a ftp server, unpacking, configure, build and install.
native on an athlon xp1600 1 minute 40 seconds
uml (2.4.24) in tt mode just over 13 minutes
in a qemu (not qemu-fast) virtual machine 30 minutes
bochs took 118 minutes
These are recent cvs snapshots for both qemu and bochs. Used the default
compile flags.
--
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-02-28 1:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-02-20 8:34 [Qemu-devel] benchmarks Tom Musgrove
2004-02-20 12:09 ` Gabriel Ebner
2004-02-28 0:56 ` James Boddington
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.