lost patch for fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c

lost patch for fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c

[Mark Nipper]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1065 bytes --]

	Any reason the attached patch from Oleg Drokin never made
it even in 2.6.10 now?  I see the supposedly harmless errors this
patch is meant to correct and it seems like an oversight it never
made it into the tree.

-- 
Mark Nipper                                                e-contacts:
4475 Carter Creek Parkway                           nipsy@bitgnome.net
Apartment 724                               http://nipsy.bitgnome.net/
Bryan, Texas, 77802-4481           AIM/Yahoo: texasnipsy ICQ: 66971617
(979)575-3193                                      MSN: nipsy@tamu.edu

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GG/IT d- s++:+ a- C++$ UBL++++$ P--->+++ L+++$ !E---
W++(--) N+ o K++ w(---) O++ M V(--) PS+++(+) PE(--)
Y+ PGP t+ 5 X R tv b+++@ DI+(++) D+ G e h r++ y+(**)
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

---begin random quote of the moment---
He hoped and prayed that there wasn't an afterlife. Then he
realized there was a contradiction involved here and merely
hoped that there wasn't an afterlife.
 -- Douglas Adams
----end random quote of the moment----

[-- Attachment #2: indirect_item.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 678 bytes --]

--- linux-2.6.10/fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c.orig	2004-12-24 15:34:30.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6.10/fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c	2005-01-07 13:20:43.000000000 -0600
@@ -510,9 +510,10 @@
 	// s2bytes
 	snum012[4] = op_unit_num (&vn->vn_vi[split_item_num]) - snum012[4] - bytes_to_r - bytes_to_l - bytes_to_S1new;
 
-	if (vn->vn_vi[split_item_num].vi_index != TYPE_DIRENTRY)
+	if (vn->vn_vi[split_item_num].vi_index != TYPE_DIRENTRY &&
+	    vn->vn_vi[split_item_num].vi_index != TYPE_INDIRECT)
 	    reiserfs_warning (tb->tb_sb, "vs-8115: get_num_ver: not "
-			      "directory item");
+			      "directory or indirect item");
     }
 
     /* now we know S2bytes, calculate S1bytes */