All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@mellanox.co.il>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@minantech.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@vc.cvut.cz>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
	Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: set_page_dirty vs set_page_dirty_lock
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 20:54:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051208195433.GY26185@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0512081908530.11737@goblin.wat.veritas.com>

On Thu, Dec 08 2005, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> It can be very inconvenient (I don't know what to do for drivers/scsi/sg.c
> than set_page_dirty and hope for the best, since it cannot wait for a lock
> where it needs to).  But I'm afraid you do have the very case where
> set_page_dirty_lock is appropriate.

See bio_set_pages_dirty() in fs/bio.c and the framework for handling
those (notably bio_dirty_fn()).

> Many would be pleased if we could manage without set_page_dirty_lock.

Indeed, would make life easier there as well..

-- 
Jens Axboe


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-12-08 19:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-08 19:09 set_page_dirty vs set_page_dirty_lock Michael S. Tsirkin
2005-12-08 19:19 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-12-08 19:29   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2005-12-08 19:54   ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2005-12-08 21:56   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2005-12-12  3:28     ` Nick Piggin
2005-12-12  6:35       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2005-12-12  7:10         ` Nick Piggin
2005-12-12  8:14           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2005-12-12  8:32             ` Nick Piggin
2005-12-12  8:55               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2005-12-12  9:23                 ` Nick Piggin
2005-12-12  9:59                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2005-12-13 21:07                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051208195433.GY26185@suse.de \
    --to=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=gleb@minantech.com \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@mellanox.co.il \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=vandrove@vc.cvut.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.