All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: dada1@cosmosbay.com, clameter@engr.sgi.com, akpm@osdl.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au,
	Simon.Derr@bull.net, ak@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cpuset: rcu optimization of page alloc hook
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:06:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051213200651.44845df4.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051214040236.GF23384@wotan.suse.de>

Andi wrote:
> That is why call_rcu.et.al. is a better interface if you want performance.
> It runs the freeing batched in the background.

True.

In this case, my free'ing code is non-trivial, and my performance
requirements very minimal.  So I'll take the easier synchronize_rcu()
over the asynchronous call_rcu().

But, yes, that's the tradeoff.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401

  reply	other threads:[~2005-12-14  4:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-11 23:31 [PATCH] Cpuset: rcu optimization of page alloc hook Paul Jackson
2005-12-12  3:29 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-12  6:11   ` Paul Jackson
2005-12-12  6:21     ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-12  6:50       ` Paul Jackson
2005-12-12  8:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-12-12  8:54   ` Nick Piggin
2005-12-12  9:06     ` Eric Dumazet
2005-12-12  9:11     ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-12  9:38       ` Nick Piggin
2005-12-12 10:02   ` Paul Jackson
2005-12-12 10:12     ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-13 15:53       ` Paul Jackson
2005-12-13 16:31         ` Eric Dumazet
2005-12-13 17:42           ` Christoph Lameter
2005-12-13 17:56             ` Eric Dumazet
2005-12-13 18:07               ` Christoph Lameter
2005-12-13 21:03               ` Paul Jackson
2005-12-13 21:16                 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-12-13 21:38                 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-12-13 22:23                   ` Paul Jackson
2005-12-13 22:29                     ` Christoph Lameter
2005-12-14  3:54                     ` Paul Jackson
2005-12-14  4:02                       ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-14  4:06                         ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2005-12-14  8:06                     ` Eric Dumazet
2005-12-14  8:40                       ` Paul Jackson
2005-12-13 20:08           ` Paul Jackson
2005-12-13 20:29             ` Eric Dumazet
2005-12-13 22:35               ` Paul Jackson
2005-12-13 21:44           ` Paul Jackson
2005-12-13 17:37         ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051213200651.44845df4.pj@sgi.com \
    --to=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=Simon.Derr@bull.net \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=clameter@engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.