* [PATCH 0/3] proc: bye bye tasklist_lock
@ 2006-09-09 22:18 Oleg Nesterov
2006-09-11 11:19 ` Jean Delvare
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2006-09-09 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: Eric W. Biederman, Jean Delvare, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, linux-kernel
fs/proc/ does not use tasklist_lock anymore.
These patches are simple enough and do not depend on each other.
The only problem I don't know how to really test them.
Can anybody recommend a stress-test?
Oleg.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] proc: bye bye tasklist_lock
2006-09-09 22:18 [PATCH 0/3] proc: bye bye tasklist_lock Oleg Nesterov
@ 2006-09-11 11:19 ` Jean Delvare
2006-09-11 18:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2006-09-11 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Andrew Morton, Eric W. Biederman, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, linux-kernel
Hi Oleg,
On Sunday 10 September 2006 00:18, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> fs/proc/ does not use tasklist_lock anymore.
>
> These patches are simple enough and do not depend on each other.
> The only problem I don't know how to really test them.
Just to make sure I understand what it is all about: Is there a relation
between this patchset and the recent patch from Eric fixing the
readdir(/proc) race?
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] proc: bye bye tasklist_lock
2006-09-11 11:19 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2006-09-11 18:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2006-09-11 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jean Delvare
Cc: Andrew Morton, Eric W. Biederman, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, linux-kernel
On 09/11, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Oleg,
>
> On Sunday 10 September 2006 00:18, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > fs/proc/ does not use tasklist_lock anymore.
> >
> > These patches are simple enough and do not depend on each other.
> > The only problem I don't know how to really test them.
>
> Just to make sure I understand what it is all about: Is there a relation
> between this patchset and the recent patch from Eric fixing the
> readdir(/proc) race?
No, they are not related. This series doesn't fix bugs, just
removes tasklist_lock from fs/proc/ entirely.
Oleg.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-09-11 18:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-09-09 22:18 [PATCH 0/3] proc: bye bye tasklist_lock Oleg Nesterov
2006-09-11 11:19 ` Jean Delvare
2006-09-11 18:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.