* [Buildroot] Enabling Static builds
@ 2007-02-07 17:00 Daniel Laird
2007-02-07 17:19 ` Bernhard Fischer
2007-02-07 18:15 ` Marc Lindahl
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Laird @ 2007-02-07 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
I have been looking at a number of the packages in the system. Do people
think that -enable-static is a good idea as it seems to be used in a log of
package configures.
would a global enable-static option and enable-shared option be good idea?
This would mean that if you choose it it passes --enable-option to configure
else --disable-option this could be helpful for embedded systems
What do people think?
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Enabling-Static-builds-tf3188244.html#a8849503
Sent from the BuildRoot mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Enabling Static builds
2007-02-07 17:00 [Buildroot] Enabling Static builds Daniel Laird
@ 2007-02-07 17:19 ` Bernhard Fischer
2007-02-07 18:15 ` Marc Lindahl
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bernhard Fischer @ 2007-02-07 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:00:29AM -0800, Daniel Laird wrote:
>
>I have been looking at a number of the packages in the system. Do people
>think that -enable-static is a good idea as it seems to be used in a log of
>package configures.
>would a global enable-static option and enable-shared option be good idea?
>This would mean that if you choose it it passes --enable-option to configure
>else --disable-option this could be helpful for embedded systems
>What do people think?
I don't use that myself, but from the looks we should clean this up a
bit to better support flat, no?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Enabling Static builds
2007-02-07 17:00 [Buildroot] Enabling Static builds Daniel Laird
2007-02-07 17:19 ` Bernhard Fischer
@ 2007-02-07 18:15 ` Marc Lindahl
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Marc Lindahl @ 2007-02-07 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
+1
On Feb 7, 2007, at 12:00 PM, Daniel Laird wrote:
>
> I have been looking at a number of the packages in the system. Do
> people
> think that -enable-static is a good idea as it seems to be used in a
> log of
> package configures.
> would a global enable-static option and enable-shared option be good
> idea?
> This would mean that if you choose it it passes --enable-option to
> configure
> else --disable-option this could be helpful for embedded systems
> What do people think?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Enabling-Static-builds-tf3188244.html#a8849503
> Sent from the BuildRoot mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> buildroot mailing list
> buildroot at uclibc.org
> http://busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-02-07 18:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-02-07 17:00 [Buildroot] Enabling Static builds Daniel Laird
2007-02-07 17:19 ` Bernhard Fischer
2007-02-07 18:15 ` Marc Lindahl
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.