[PATCH][IPSEC][0/6] fix conflict of device tunnels with the ipsec tunnel

[PATCH][IPSEC][0/6] fix conflict of device tunnels with the ipsec tunnel

[Kazunori MIYAZAWA]

Hello David and Herbert,

Thank you for applying our patches with the fix.

I send patches to fix conflict of device tunnels with the inter
address family ipsec tunnel. Yoshifuji-san and Kozakai-san
noticed me of the confliction.

I adopt same approach of tunnel4.c and tunnel6.c. I extend them
to support inter address family.

We need this to use ipcomp with inter address family tunnel.

[1/6] extending xfrm4_tunnel utility to support inter address family for "sit"
[2/6] extending xfrm6_tunnel utility to support inter address family
[3/6] fix to refer encap_family when comparing the kernel generated xfrm_state
[4/6] changing "ipip tunnel" and xfrm4_tunnel to the API
[5/6] changing "ip6_tunnel" and xfrm6_tunnel to the API
[6/6] make "sit tunnel" use xfrm4_tunnel_register 

Best regards,

--
Kazunori Miyazawa

Re: [PATCH][IPSEC][0/6] fix conflict of device tunnels with the ipsec tunnel

[YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明]

In article <20070208170324.3e3a4d59.kazunori@miyazawa.org> (at Thu, 8 Feb 2007 17:03:24 +0900), Kazunori MIYAZAWA <kazunori@miyazawa.org> says:

> We need this to use ipcomp with inter address family tunnel.
> 
> [1/6] extending xfrm4_tunnel utility to support inter address family for "sit"
> [2/6] extending xfrm6_tunnel utility to support inter address family
> [3/6] fix to refer encap_family when comparing the kernel generated xfrm_state
> [4/6] changing "ipip tunnel" and xfrm4_tunnel to the API
> [5/6] changing "ip6_tunnel" and xfrm6_tunnel to the API
> [6/6] make "sit tunnel" use xfrm4_tunnel_register 

Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>

--yoshfuji

Re: [PATCH][IPSEC][0/6] fix conflict of device tunnels with the ipsec tunnel

[David Miller]

From: Kazunori MIYAZAWA <kazunori@miyazawa.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 17:03:24 +0900

> I send patches to fix conflict of device tunnels with the inter
> address family ipsec tunnel. Yoshifuji-san and Kozakai-san
> noticed me of the confliction.
> 
> I adopt same approach of tunnel4.c and tunnel6.c. I extend them
> to support inter address family.
> 
> We need this to use ipcomp with inter address family tunnel.

Please fixup the issues reported by Patrick McHardy, thank you.