All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@openvz.org>
Cc: viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	duncan.sands@math.u-psud.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Fix rmmod/read/write races in /proc entries
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 01:00:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070209010037.7f4393c5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070208132012.GA6041@localhost.sw.ru>

On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 16:20:12 +0300 Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@openvz.org> wrote:

> +again:
>  	spin_lock(&proc_subdir_lock);
>  	for (p = &parent->subdir; *p; p=&(*p)->next ) {
>  		if (!proc_match(len, fn, *p))
>  			continue;
>  		de = *p;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Stop accepting new readers/writers. If you're dynamically
> +		 * allocating ->proc_fops, save a pointer somewhere.
> +		 */
> +		spin_lock(&de->pde_unload_lock);
> +		de->proc_fops = NULL;
> +		/* Wait until all readers/writers are done. */
> +		if (de->pde_users > 0) {
> +			spin_unlock(&de->pde_unload_lock);
> +			spin_unlock(&proc_subdir_lock);
> +			schedule();
> +			goto again;
> +		}
> +		spin_unlock(&de->pde_unload_lock);

aergh.  This will devolve into busy-wait-until-we-expire-our-timeslice.

Would be nicer to do this with a wait_for_completion().

I guess it doesn't happen very often - if another process happens to
be in the middle or a read or write syscall to that /proc file.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-09  9:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-08 13:20 [PATCH v3] Fix rmmod/read/write races in /proc entries Alexey Dobriyan
2007-02-09  9:00 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-02-11 20:23   ` [PATCH v4] " Alexey Dobriyan
2007-02-11 20:34     ` Al Viro
2007-02-13  6:35     ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-13 16:16       ` Alexey Dobriyan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070209010037.7f4393c5.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=adobriyan@openvz.org \
    --cc=duncan.sands@math.u-psud.fr \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.