* [PATCH] show_date(): rename the "relative" parameter to "mode"
@ 2007-02-27 15:21 Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-27 21:41 ` Linus Torvalds
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Schindelin @ 2007-02-27 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git, Simon Josefsson; +Cc: junkio
Now, show_date() can print three different kinds of dates: normal,
relative and short (%Y-%m-%s) dates.
To achieve this, the "int relative" was changed to "enum date_mode
mode", which has three states: DATE_NORMAL, DATE_RELATIVE and
DATE_SHORT.
Since existing users of show_date() only call it with relative_date
being either 0 or 1, and DATE_NORMAL and DATE_RELATIVE having these
values, no behaviour is changed.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
---
cache.h | 3 ++-
date.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cache.h b/cache.h
index 8bbc142..8f89a8b 100644
--- a/cache.h
+++ b/cache.h
@@ -326,7 +326,8 @@ extern void *read_object_with_reference(const unsigned char *sha1,
unsigned long *size,
unsigned char *sha1_ret);
-const char *show_date(unsigned long time, int timezone, int relative);
+enum date_mode { DATE_NORMAL = 0, DATE_RELATIVE, DATE_SHORT };
+const char *show_date(unsigned long time, int timezone, enum date_mode mode);
const char *show_rfc2822_date(unsigned long time, int timezone);
int parse_date(const char *date, char *buf, int bufsize);
void datestamp(char *buf, int bufsize);
diff --git a/date.c b/date.c
index 542c004..0ceccbe 100644
--- a/date.c
+++ b/date.c
@@ -55,12 +55,12 @@ static struct tm *time_to_tm(unsigned long time, int tz)
return gmtime(&t);
}
-const char *show_date(unsigned long time, int tz, int relative)
+const char *show_date(unsigned long time, int tz, enum date_mode mode)
{
struct tm *tm;
static char timebuf[200];
- if (relative) {
+ if (mode == DATE_RELATIVE) {
unsigned long diff;
struct timeval now;
gettimeofday(&now, NULL);
@@ -105,12 +105,16 @@ const char *show_date(unsigned long time, int tz, int relative)
tm = time_to_tm(time, tz);
if (!tm)
return NULL;
- sprintf(timebuf, "%.3s %.3s %d %02d:%02d:%02d %d %+05d",
- weekday_names[tm->tm_wday],
- month_names[tm->tm_mon],
- tm->tm_mday,
- tm->tm_hour, tm->tm_min, tm->tm_sec,
- tm->tm_year + 1900, tz);
+ if (mode == DATE_SHORT)
+ sprintf(timebuf, "%04d-%02d-%02d", tm->tm_year + 1900,
+ tm->tm_mon + 1, tm->tm_mday);
+ else
+ sprintf(timebuf, "%.3s %.3s %d %02d:%02d:%02d %d %+05d",
+ weekday_names[tm->tm_wday],
+ month_names[tm->tm_mon],
+ tm->tm_mday,
+ tm->tm_hour, tm->tm_min, tm->tm_sec,
+ tm->tm_year + 1900, tz);
return timebuf;
}
--
1.5.0.2.2410.g737b
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] show_date(): rename the "relative" parameter to "mode"
2007-02-27 15:21 [PATCH] show_date(): rename the "relative" parameter to "mode" Johannes Schindelin
@ 2007-02-27 21:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-27 21:51 ` Junio C Hamano
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2007-02-27 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Schindelin; +Cc: git, Simon Josefsson, junkio
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> Now, show_date() can print three different kinds of dates: normal,
> relative and short (%Y-%m-%s) dates.
>
> To achieve this, the "int relative" was changed to "enum date_mode
> mode", which has three states: DATE_NORMAL, DATE_RELATIVE and
> DATE_SHORT.
Ack. I think this kind of thing is worth it regardless of any of the other
issues (ie the whole "changelog" thing).
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] show_date(): rename the "relative" parameter to "mode"
2007-02-27 21:41 ` Linus Torvalds
@ 2007-02-27 21:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-27 21:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-27 22:13 ` Johannes Schindelin
2 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2007-02-27 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds; +Cc: Johannes Schindelin, git, Simon Josefsson, junkio
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>>
>> Now, show_date() can print three different kinds of dates: normal,
>> relative and short (%Y-%m-%s) dates.
>>
>> To achieve this, the "int relative" was changed to "enum date_mode
>> mode", which has three states: DATE_NORMAL, DATE_RELATIVE and
>> DATE_SHORT.
>
> Ack. I think this kind of thing is worth it regardless of any of the other
> issues (ie the whole "changelog" thing).
Ack-on-Ack.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] show_date(): rename the "relative" parameter to "mode"
2007-02-27 21:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-27 21:51 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2007-02-27 21:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-27 22:24 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-27 22:13 ` Johannes Schindelin
2 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2007-02-27 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Schindelin; +Cc: git, Simon Josefsson, junkio
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Ack. I think this kind of thing is worth it regardless of any of the other
> issues (ie the whole "changelog" thing).
Side note: one of the reasons I like having more fine-grained date flags
is that I've occasionally wanted a "show in UTC time" or "show everything
in *my* local time" option. Sometimes it's a bit hard to compare dates
just because we show them as they were for the people who did them, not
in any unified format ;)
I'm not sure how useful that really would end up being, but the whole
approach of just having a "date mode" flag should at least make those
kinds of things trivial if we ever really want it.
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] show_date(): rename the "relative" parameter to "mode"
2007-02-27 21:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-27 21:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-27 21:59 ` Linus Torvalds
@ 2007-02-27 22:13 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-27 23:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Schindelin @ 2007-02-27 22:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds; +Cc: git, Simon Josefsson, junkio
Hi,
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> >
> > Now, show_date() can print three different kinds of dates: normal,
> > relative and short (%Y-%m-%s) dates.
> >
> > To achieve this, the "int relative" was changed to "enum date_mode
> > mode", which has three states: DATE_NORMAL, DATE_RELATIVE and
> > DATE_SHORT.
>
> Ack. I think this kind of thing is worth it regardless of any of the
> other issues (ie the whole "changelog" thing).
Gee, thanks!
And you are no supporter of a GNU ChangeLog? Imagine being able to produce
a GNU style ChangeLog of the Linux kernel in no time at all...
Ciao,
Dscho
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] show_date(): rename the "relative" parameter to "mode"
2007-02-27 21:59 ` Linus Torvalds
@ 2007-02-27 22:24 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-27 23:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-27 23:09 ` Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 2 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Schindelin @ 2007-02-27 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds; +Cc: git, Simon Josefsson, junkio
Hi,
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Side note: one of the reasons I like having more fine-grained date flags
> is that I've occasionally wanted a "show in UTC time" or "show
> everything in *my* local time" option.
I found the --relative-date option very useful to that end, if a bit long
to type.
Ciao,
Dscho
P.S.: It is refreshing to see somebody using the same convention of
one-space-after-full-stop as me. Europeans...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] show_date(): rename the "relative" parameter to "mode"
2007-02-27 22:13 ` Johannes Schindelin
@ 2007-02-27 23:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-27 23:10 ` Johannes Schindelin
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2007-02-27 23:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Schindelin; +Cc: git, Simon Josefsson, junkio
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> And you are no supporter of a GNU ChangeLog? Imagine being able to produce
> a GNU style ChangeLog of the Linux kernel in no time at all...
I don't think the GNU style ChangeLog is particularly good. In fact, I
think it has an unfortunate tendency (thanks to being per-file-log) to
encourage people to commit unrelated changes and then explain them per
file.
Of course, you can't do that under git anyway, but I sure hope people
don't start thinking that they should explain their changes in the git
commit messages that way - my point being that certain log formats tend to
encourage certain behaviour, and the GNU log format I think tends to do
that exactly the wrong way around.
That said, listing the functions that got changed (which I don't know if
you did, but some GNU changelogs do) may be a nice thing.
And hey, if some project wants GNU changelogs, I'm not against them. I
just don't think they are in any way "superior", and the per-file comments
really turn me off.
But the "short date + author name" on one line part I certainly don't
disagree with. I often use "git log --stat", and the three-line
default header that git uses is a bit verbose (but at least a shortened
commit name would be good - one of the things I then do is that I may want
to look in more detail at a commit).
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] show_date(): rename the "relative" parameter to "mode"
2007-02-27 22:24 ` Johannes Schindelin
@ 2007-02-27 23:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-27 23:13 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-27 23:09 ` Junio C Hamano
1 sibling, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2007-02-27 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Schindelin; +Cc: git, Simon Josefsson, junkio
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > Side note: one of the reasons I like having more fine-grained date flags
> > is that I've occasionally wanted a "show in UTC time" or "show
> > everything in *my* local time" option.
>
> I found the --relative-date option very useful to that end, if a bit long
> to type.
That really doesn't work for stuff that is more than a day old. The
difference between "3 weeks ago" and "3 weeks ago" is not usually very
obvious.
(Hint: often they are days apart, but the relative date-format will just
hide any differences due to excessive granularity).
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] show_date(): rename the "relative" parameter to "mode"
2007-02-27 22:24 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-27 23:04 ` Linus Torvalds
@ 2007-02-27 23:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-27 23:20 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-27 23:59 ` Linus Torvalds
1 sibling, 2 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2007-02-27 23:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Schindelin; +Cc: Linus Torvalds, git, Simon Josefsson, junkio
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>> Side note: one of the reasons I like having more fine-grained date flags
>> is that I've occasionally wanted a "show in UTC time" or "show
>> everything in *my* local time" option.
>
> I found the --relative-date option very useful to that end, if a bit long
> to type.
How about --ago as a synonym, and --my-date for obeying TZ?
"show in UTC time" can be had by something like:
$ TZ=UTC git log --my-date
I personally am not very happy that "reflog show @{now}" gives
relative date and not the full datestamp.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] show_date(): rename the "relative" parameter to "mode"
2007-02-27 23:02 ` Linus Torvalds
@ 2007-02-27 23:10 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-27 23:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-27 23:18 ` GNU ChangeLogs, was " Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-28 9:48 ` OT: Favourite log message layout Andy Parkins
2 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Schindelin @ 2007-02-27 23:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds; +Cc: git, Simon Josefsson, junkio
Hi,
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> But the "short date + author name" on one line part I certainly don't
> disagree with.
If you use "next" Git:
$ git log --pretty=format:"%h %ad %an"
Ciao,
Dscho
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] show_date(): rename the "relative" parameter to "mode"
2007-02-27 23:04 ` Linus Torvalds
@ 2007-02-27 23:13 ` Johannes Schindelin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Schindelin @ 2007-02-27 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds; +Cc: git, Simon Josefsson, junkio
Hi,
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > > Side note: one of the reasons I like having more fine-grained date
> > > flags is that I've occasionally wanted a "show in UTC time" or "show
> > > everything in *my* local time" option.
> >
> > I found the --relative-date option very useful to that end, if a bit
> > long to type.
>
> That really doesn't work for stuff that is more than a day old. The
> difference between "3 weeks ago" and "3 weeks ago" is not usually very
> obvious.
>
> (Hint: often they are days apart, but the relative date-format will just
> hide any differences due to excessive granularity).
Maybe we need --relative-but-verbose-date?
Ciao,
Dscho
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* GNU ChangeLogs, was Re: [PATCH] show_date(): rename the "relative" parameter to "mode"
2007-02-27 23:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-27 23:10 ` Johannes Schindelin
@ 2007-02-27 23:18 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-28 9:48 ` OT: Favourite log message layout Andy Parkins
2 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Schindelin @ 2007-02-27 23:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds; +Cc: git, Simon Josefsson, junkio
Hi,
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I don't think the GNU style ChangeLog is particularly good. In fact, I
> think it has an unfortunate tendency (thanks to being per-file-log) to
> encourage people to commit unrelated changes and then explain them per
> file.
Yes, that is some bad thing.
> Of course, you can't do that under git anyway, but I sure hope people
> don't start thinking that they should explain their changes in the git
> commit messages that way - my point being that certain log formats tend
> to encourage certain behaviour, and the GNU log format I think tends to
> do that exactly the wrong way around.
Well, if you have to change your committing behaviour to get sensible
automatic GNU ChangeLog from history, that would be a start, wouldn't it?
> That said, listing the functions that got changed (which I don't know if
> you did, but some GNU changelogs do) may be a nice thing.
No I did not.
It is not _that_ easy with existing interfaces. Like I illustrated in an
example I sent in another reply, you miss newly introduced functions.
Besides, without my Java-methods patch I sent yesterday, our function name
extraction is utterly unusable on Java projects (and C++ projects with
inlined methods).
> And hey, if some project wants GNU changelogs, I'm not against them. I
> just don't think they are in any way "superior", and the per-file
> comments really turn me off.
I think that the standard behaviour of "git log" rocks. But it would not
hurt to be able to point to "git log --pretty=gnucl", to prove that Git is
the ultimate SCM.
Ciao,
Dscho
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] show_date(): rename the "relative" parameter to "mode"
2007-02-27 23:09 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2007-02-27 23:20 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-27 23:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-27 23:59 ` Linus Torvalds
1 sibling, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Schindelin @ 2007-02-27 23:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Linus Torvalds, git, Simon Josefsson
Hi,
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>
> >> Side note: one of the reasons I like having more fine-grained date
> >> flags is that I've occasionally wanted a "show in UTC time" or "show
> >> everything in *my* local time" option.
> >
> > I found the --relative-date option very useful to that end, if a bit
> > long to type.
>
> How about --ago as a synonym, and --my-date for obeying TZ? "show in UTC
> time" can be had by something like:
>
> $ TZ=UTC git log --my-date
I like both.
> I personally am not very happy that "reflog show @{now}" gives relative
> date and not the full datestamp.
$ git log -g @{now}
Ciao,
Dscho
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] show_date(): rename the "relative" parameter to "mode"
2007-02-27 23:20 ` Johannes Schindelin
@ 2007-02-27 23:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-27 23:52 ` Johannes Schindelin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2007-02-27 23:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Schindelin; +Cc: Linus Torvalds, git, Simon Josefsson
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>> I personally am not very happy that "reflog show @{now}" gives relative
>> date and not the full datestamp.
>
> $ git log -g @{now}
I said "reflog show" because I wanted to have oneline and
abbrev.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] show_date(): rename the "relative" parameter to "mode"
2007-02-27 23:34 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2007-02-27 23:52 ` Johannes Schindelin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Schindelin @ 2007-02-27 23:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Linus Torvalds, git, Simon Josefsson
Hi,
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>
> >> I personally am not very happy that "reflog show @{now}" gives relative
> >> date and not the full datestamp.
> >
> > $ git log -g @{now}
>
> I said "reflog show" because I wanted to have oneline and abbrev.
Ah. Yes.
However, when I look at reflogs, usually I know an approximate relative
date of the commit I am looking for. I _do_ arithmetic in my head, only
that base-60 is a little slow...
Ciao,
Dscho
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] show_date(): rename the "relative" parameter to "mode"
2007-02-27 23:10 ` Johannes Schindelin
@ 2007-02-27 23:53 ` Linus Torvalds
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2007-02-27 23:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Schindelin; +Cc: git, Simon Josefsson, junkio
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> If you use "next" Git:
>
> $ git log --pretty=format:"%h %ad %an"
Well, that has the long-format date, which really isn't appropriate for a
one-liner format.
It's one of the reasons I agreed with your show_date() changes: I think
our date output formats are fairly limited. I love the long date format,
but if I want to show a commit name and author name and email on the same
line, no way can we use 30+ characters for just the date.
So the part about the GNU ChangeLog format I like is the single-line
header thing.. Right now, the choice between "--pretty=xxx" choices is
"oneline", "short", "medium", and there's something lacking there in
between ("terse").
The "format:" thing certainly gives us more options to play with, though.
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] show_date(): rename the "relative" parameter to "mode"
2007-02-27 23:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-27 23:20 ` Johannes Schindelin
@ 2007-02-27 23:59 ` Linus Torvalds
1 sibling, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2007-02-27 23:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Johannes Schindelin, git, Simon Josefsson
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> How about --ago as a synonym, and --my-date for obeying TZ?
> "show in UTC time" can be had by something like:
>
> $ TZ=UTC git log --my-date
Yes, although I would suggest that at that point we also use a shorter
date format, since the timezone (by definition) is no longer valid or
interesting.
But in general, there are other date issues - if we start showing the date
in other non-rfc2822 formats (like skipping the timezone), we migth as
well also support denser times..
For example, I occasionally love seeing the seconds, especially when I
apply a series of patches from Andrew, and I see myself committing 5-6
patches per second - but it's just noise if you want a single-line thing.
So showing dates as "yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm" makes sense (and sorts properly).
So instead of "--my-date", I'd suggest "--date[-format]=xyz" as an option,
possibly even with a way to set some defaults for "git log" using the
config file.
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* OT: Favourite log message layout
2007-02-27 23:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-27 23:10 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-27 23:18 ` GNU ChangeLogs, was " Johannes Schindelin
@ 2007-02-28 9:48 ` Andy Parkins
2 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Andy Parkins @ 2007-02-28 9:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git; +Cc: Linus Torvalds, Johannes Schindelin, Simon Josefsson, junkio
On Tuesday 2007 February 27 23:02, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I don't think the GNU style ChangeLog is particularly good. In fact, I
> think it has an unfortunate tendency (thanks to being per-file-log) to
> encourage people to commit unrelated changes and then explain them per
> file.
Me either; however, I do like per-file information. My own favoured format
for log messages is (with all but the shortlog optional)
---- 8< ----
Short log message summarises changes in one line
Longer message summarises changes, perhaps with reasons for change and why
this change fixes something.
file1.c
* detailed description of change to this file
* more changes
file2.c
* detailed description of change to this file
---- >8 ----
That's not to say that this is an excuse to lump unrelated changes together,
but it does allow one to say
file1.c
* Added function xyz()
file2.c
* Call new function xyz() to achieve clever feature
when it's appropriate. I've found this particularly useful in conjunction
with git-blame. You find the revision that made a change in a particular
file then the log message is easily searched to find the exact reasons for
that change on that line in that file.
Perhaps I'm overly verbose though. I do like the sound of my own voice - even
on log messages :-)
Andy
--
Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIET
andyparkins@gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-02-28 9:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-02-27 15:21 [PATCH] show_date(): rename the "relative" parameter to "mode" Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-27 21:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-27 21:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-27 21:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-27 22:24 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-27 23:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-27 23:13 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-27 23:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-27 23:20 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-27 23:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-27 23:52 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-27 23:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-27 22:13 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-27 23:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-27 23:10 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-27 23:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-27 23:18 ` GNU ChangeLogs, was " Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-28 9:48 ` OT: Favourite log message layout Andy Parkins
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.