All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] libata-core: Fix simplex handling
@ 2007-03-01 17:36 Alan
  2007-03-02 22:42 ` Jeff Garzik
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Alan @ 2007-03-01 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-ide, linux-kernel, akpm, torvalds, jgarzik

The initial simplex handling code is fooled if you suspend and resume.
This also causes problems with some single channel controllers which
claim to be simplex.

The fix is fairly simple, instead of keeping a flag to remember if we
gave away the simplex channel we remember the actual owner. As the owner
is always part of the host_set we don't even need a refcount.

Knowing the owner also means we can reassign simplex DMA channels in
future hotplug code etc if we need to

Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
(and a signed-off for the patch I sent before while I remember)

diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude linux.vanilla-2.6.21-rc2/drivers/ata/libata-core.c linux-2.6.21-rc2/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
--- linux.vanilla-2.6.21-rc2/drivers/ata/libata-core.c	2007-03-01 13:36:03.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc2/drivers/ata/libata-core.c	2007-03-01 15:49:21.853448880 +0000
@@ -2556,12 +2622,11 @@
 	 * host channels are not permitted to do so.
 	 */
 	if (used_dma && (ap->host->flags & ATA_HOST_SIMPLEX))
-		ap->host->simplex_claimed = 1;
+		ap->host->simplex_claimed = ap;
 
 	/* step5: chip specific finalisation */
 	if (ap->ops->post_set_mode)
 		ap->ops->post_set_mode(ap);
-
  out:
 	if (rc)
 		*r_failed_dev = dev;
@@ -3442,7 +3507,7 @@
 			       "device is on DMA blacklist, disabling DMA\n");
 	}
 
-	if ((host->flags & ATA_HOST_SIMPLEX) && host->simplex_claimed) {
+	if ((host->flags & ATA_HOST_SIMPLEX) && host->simplex_claimed != ap) {
 		xfer_mask &= ~(ATA_MASK_MWDMA | ATA_MASK_UDMA);
 		ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_WARNING, "simplex DMA is claimed by "
 			       "other device, disabling DMA\n");
diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude linux.vanilla-2.6.21-rc2/include/linux/libata.h linux-2.6.21-rc2/include/linux/libata.h
--- linux.vanilla-2.6.21-rc2/include/linux/libata.h	2007-03-01 13:36:13.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc2/include/linux/libata.h	2007-03-01 14:27:53.363612296 +0000
@@ -403,8 +403,7 @@
 	void			*private_data;
 	const struct ata_port_operations *ops;
 	unsigned long		flags;
-	int			simplex_claimed;	/* Keep seperate in case we
-							   ever need to do this locked */
+	struct ata_port		*simplex_claimed;	/* channel owning the DMA */
 	struct ata_port		*ports[0];
 };
 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] libata-core: Fix simplex handling
  2007-03-01 17:36 [PATCH] libata-core: Fix simplex handling Alan
@ 2007-03-02 22:42 ` Jeff Garzik
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2007-03-02 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alan; +Cc: linux-ide, linux-kernel, akpm, torvalds

Alan wrote:
> The initial simplex handling code is fooled if you suspend and resume.
> This also causes problems with some single channel controllers which
> claim to be simplex.
> 
> The fix is fairly simple, instead of keeping a flag to remember if we
> gave away the simplex channel we remember the actual owner. As the owner
> is always part of the host_set we don't even need a refcount.
> 
> Knowing the owner also means we can reassign simplex DMA channels in
> future hotplug code etc if we need to
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
> (and a signed-off for the patch I sent before while I remember)

applied



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-03-02 22:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-03-01 17:36 [PATCH] libata-core: Fix simplex handling Alan
2007-03-02 22:42 ` Jeff Garzik

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.