All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* iproute2-2.6.20-070313 bug ?
@ 2007-03-21 18:00 Denys
  2007-03-22 11:23 ` Patrick McHardy
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Denys @ 2007-03-21 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev

Possible i discovered bug, but maybe specific to my setup. 

In your sources (tc/tc_core.h) i notice 
#define TIME_UNITS_PER_SEC    1000000000 
When i change it to 
#define TIME_UNITS_PER_SEC      1000000.0 
(it was value before in sources) 
everythign works fine. Otherwise tbf not working at all, it is dropping all 
packets.

Did anyone test new iproute2 with tbf?
--
Virtual ISP S.A.L.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: iproute2-2.6.20-070313 bug ?
  2007-03-21 18:00 iproute2-2.6.20-070313 bug ? Denys
@ 2007-03-22 11:23 ` Patrick McHardy
  2007-03-22 12:46   ` Denys
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2007-03-22 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Denys; +Cc: netdev

Denys wrote:
> Possible i discovered bug, but maybe specific to my setup. 
> 
> In your sources (tc/tc_core.h) i notice 
> #define TIME_UNITS_PER_SEC    1000000000 
> When i change it to 
> #define TIME_UNITS_PER_SEC      1000000.0 
> (it was value before in sources) 
> everythign works fine. Otherwise tbf not working at all, it is dropping all 
> packets.
> 
> Did anyone test new iproute2 with tbf?


Yes, please send the commands you use.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: iproute2-2.6.20-070313 bug ?
  2007-03-22 11:23 ` Patrick McHardy
@ 2007-03-22 12:46   ` Denys
  2007-03-22 13:09     ` Patrick McHardy
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Denys @ 2007-03-22 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patrick McHardy; +Cc: netdev

Dear Sir

Already i sent. I will copy here also

Normal "patched by me" iproute2 

/sbin/tc qdisc del dev ppp0 root 
/sbin/tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root handle 1: prio 
/sbin/tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 handle 2: tbf buffer 1024kb latency 
500ms rate 128kbit peakrate 256kbit minburst 16384 
/sbin/tc filter add dev ppp0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 10 u32 match ip dst 
0.0.0.0/0 flowid 2:1 

tc(patched) monitor output 
deleted qdisc prio 1: dev ppp0 root bands 3 priomap  1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 
1 1 1 1 
qdisc prio 1: dev ppp0 root bands 3 priomap  1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 
qdisc tbf 2: dev ppp0 parent 1:1 rate 128000bit burst 1024Kb peakrate 
256000bit minburst 16Kb lat 500.0ms 
filter dev ppp0 parent 1: protocol ip pref 10 u32 fh 800::800 order 2048 key 
ht 800 bkt 0 flowid 2:1 
 match 00000000/00000000 at 16 

VISP-Office ~ #cat /proc/net/psched 
00000001 00000001 000f4240 000003e8 

Now running tc2, it is "stock" version 

/sbin/tc2 qdisc del dev ppp0 root 
/sbin/tc2 qdisc add dev ppp0 root handle 1: prio 
/sbin/tc2 qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 handle 2: tbf buffer 1024kb latency 
500ms rate 128kbit peakrate 256kbit minburst 16384 
/sbin/tc2 filter add dev ppp0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 10 u32 match ip dst 
0.0.0.0/0 flowid 2:1 

Monitor output: 
deleted qdisc prio 1: dev ppp0 root bands 3 priomap  1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 
1 1 1 1 
qdisc prio 1: dev ppp0 root bands 3 priomap  1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 
qdisc tbf 2: dev ppp0 parent 1:1 rate 128000bit burst 1024Kb peakrate 
256000bit minburst 16Kb lat 500.0ms 
filter dev ppp0 parent 1: protocol ip pref 10 u32 fh 800::800 order 2048 key 
ht 800 bkt 0 flowid 2:1 
 match 00000000/00000000 at 16 

VISP-Office ~ #cat /proc/net/psched 
00000001 00000001 000f4240 000003e8 

Sure when i run tc2 - i see in stats, when it stopped (tc - normal, tc2 - 
buggy): 
VISP-Office ~ #tc -s qdisc show dev ppp0 
qdisc ingress ffff: ---------------- 
Sent 184893 bytes 2311 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) 
rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 
qdisc prio 1: bands 3 priomap  1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 
Sent 7765 bytes 64 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) 
rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 64p requeues 0 
qdisc tbf 2: parent 1:1 rate 128000bit burst 4294932937b peakrate 256000bit 
minburst 16Kb lat 4.2s 
Sent 7765 bytes 64 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 64 requeues 0) 
rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 64p requeues 0 
VISP-Office ~ #tc2 -s qdisc show dev ppp0 
qdisc ingress ffff: ---------------- 
Sent 186423 bytes 2324 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) 
rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 
qdisc prio 1: bands 3 priomap  1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 
Sent 8677 bytes 77 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) 
rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 77p requeues 0 
qdisc tbf 2: parent 1:1 rate 128000bit burst 4294932937b peakrate 256000bit 
minburst 16Kb lat 4.2s 
Sent 8677 bytes 77 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 77 requeues 0) 
rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 77p requeues 0 

I wish this will be enough information. Thanks for your help!



On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:23:03 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote
> Denys wrote:
> > Possible i discovered bug, but maybe specific to my setup. 
> > 
> > In your sources (tc/tc_core.h) i notice 
> > #define TIME_UNITS_PER_SEC    1000000000 
> > When i change it to 
> > #define TIME_UNITS_PER_SEC      1000000.0 
> > (it was value before in sources) 
> > everythign works fine. Otherwise tbf not working at all, it is dropping 
all 
> > packets.
> > 
> > Did anyone test new iproute2 with tbf?
> 
> Yes, please send the commands you use.


--
Virtual ISP S.A.L.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: iproute2-2.6.20-070313 bug ?
  2007-03-22 12:46   ` Denys
@ 2007-03-22 13:09     ` Patrick McHardy
       [not found]       ` <20070322131245.M85528@visp.net.lb>
                         ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2007-03-22 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Denys; +Cc: netdev, Stephen Hemminger

Denys wrote:
> /sbin/tc2 qdisc del dev ppp0 root 
> /sbin/tc2 qdisc add dev ppp0 root handle 1: prio 
> /sbin/tc2 qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 handle 2: tbf buffer 1024kb latency 
> 500ms rate 128kbit peakrate 256kbit minburst 16384 
> /sbin/tc2 filter add dev ppp0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 10 u32 match ip dst 
> 0.0.0.0/0 flowid 2:1 


That is an incredible huge buffer value.

> qdisc tbf 2: parent 1:1 rate 128000bit burst 4294932937b peakrate
256000bit minburst 16Kb lat 4.2s

And it causes an overflow.

The limit for the TBF burst value with nanosecond resolution is
~ 4 * rate (10^9 * burst / rate < 2^32 needs to hold), resoluting
in a worst-case latency of 4 seconds. I think this limit is in the
reasonable range. Your configuration results in a worst-case
queuing delay of 64s, and I doubt that you really want that.

Obviously its not good to break existing configurations, but I
would argue that this configuration is broken.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: iproute2-2.6.20-070313 bug ?
       [not found]       ` <20070322131245.M85528@visp.net.lb>
@ 2007-03-22 13:23         ` Patrick McHardy
  2007-03-22 13:35           ` Denys
       [not found]           ` <20070322132637.M88445@visp.net.lb>
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2007-03-22 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Denys; +Cc: Linux Netdev List, Stephen Hemminger

Please don't remove CCs.

Denys wrote:
> 1024kb (if i am not wrong 1Mbyte) is huge?
> 
> For me it is ok, as soon as i have RAM.


Its not about the memory, its about the resulting queueing delay.
If you buffer packets for 64 seconds the sender will retransmit
them and you end up wasting bandwidth.

> Another thing, it is working well 
> with old tc. Just really if i have plenty of RAM's and i want 32second 
> buffer, why i cannot have that, and if i see it is really possible before?


I know it worked before. But I can't think of a reason why anyone
would want a buffer that large. Why do you want to queue packets
for up to 64 seconds?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: iproute2-2.6.20-070313 bug ?
  2007-03-22 13:09     ` Patrick McHardy
       [not found]       ` <20070322131245.M85528@visp.net.lb>
@ 2007-03-22 13:26       ` Denys
  2007-03-22 17:12       ` Stephen Hemminger
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Denys @ 2007-03-22 13:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patrick McHardy; +Cc: netdev, Stephen Hemminger

Dear sir 

Sorry, i forgot to CC other members of discussion.

1024kb (if i am not wrong 1Mbyte) is huge? 

For me it is ok, as soon as i have RAM. Another thing, it is working well 
with old tc. Just really if i have plenty of RAM's and i want 32second 
buffer, why i cannot have that, and if i see it is really possible before? 

Possible i am misunderstanding something...
In real world i am seeing reasonable to have much bigger buffers, especially 
if there is no problem in resources (RAM, timer resolution, CPU). For 
example, as i remember we had failure on one of our STM-1, and Cisco's on 
Teleglobe was buffering about 20-30seconds of data without major packetloss. 

Another thing, why i was using buffer, and possible i use it wrong:
For example customer have 128Kbit/s account, and i want to give him burst to 
open web-pages fast (256Kbit/s), but if he use bandwidth non-stop, he will 
pass this buffer, and will be throttled back to 128Kbit/s. Now seems i cannot 
give such functionality.


On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:09:06 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote
> Denys wrote:
> > /sbin/tc2 qdisc del dev ppp0 root 
> > /sbin/tc2 qdisc add dev ppp0 root handle 1: prio 
> > /sbin/tc2 qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 handle 2: tbf buffer 1024kb 
latency 
> > 500ms rate 128kbit peakrate 256kbit minburst 16384 
> > /sbin/tc2 filter add dev ppp0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 10 u32 match ip 
dst 
> > 0.0.0.0/0 flowid 2:1
> 
> That is an incredible huge buffer value.
> 
> > qdisc tbf 2: parent 1:1 rate 128000bit burst 4294932937b peakrate
> 256000bit minburst 16Kb lat 4.2s
> 
> And it causes an overflow.
> 
> The limit for the TBF burst value with nanosecond resolution is
> ~ 4 * rate (10^9 * burst / rate < 2^32 needs to hold), resoluting
> in a worst-case latency of 4 seconds. I think this limit is in the
> reasonable range. Your configuration results in a worst-case
> queuing delay of 64s, and I doubt that you really want that.
> 
> Obviously its not good to break existing configurations, but I
> would argue that this configuration is broken.


--
Virtual ISP S.A.L.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: iproute2-2.6.20-070313 bug ?
  2007-03-22 13:23         ` Patrick McHardy
@ 2007-03-22 13:35           ` Denys
       [not found]           ` <20070322132637.M88445@visp.net.lb>
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Denys @ 2007-03-22 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patrick McHardy; +Cc: netdev, Stephen Hemminger

On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:23:01 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote
> Please don't remove CCs.
> 
> Denys wrote:
> > 1024kb (if i am not wrong 1Mbyte) is huge?
> > 
> > For me it is ok, as soon as i have RAM.
> 
> Its not about the memory, its about the resulting queueing delay.
> If you buffer packets for 64 seconds the sender will retransmit
> them and you end up wasting bandwidth.
> 
> > Another thing, it is working well 
> > with old tc. Just really if i have plenty of RAM's and i want 32second 
> > buffer, why i cannot have that, and if i see it is really possible before?
> 
> I know it worked before. But I can't think of a reason why anyone
> would want a buffer that large. Why do you want to queue packets
> for up to 64 seconds?
Seems i misunderstand how it works. If i am not wrong, till buffer available, 
bandwidth will be given on "peakrate" speed, and when buffer is empty - on 
"rate" speed. I am wrong?
At least it was working like this before.

--
Virtual ISP S.A.L.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: iproute2-2.6.20-070313 bug ?
       [not found]           ` <20070322132637.M88445@visp.net.lb>
@ 2007-03-22 13:43             ` Patrick McHardy
  2007-03-22 13:47               ` Denys
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2007-03-22 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Denys; +Cc: Linux Netdev List, Stephen Hemminger

Denys wrote:
>>>Another thing, it is working well 
>>>with old tc. Just really if i have plenty of RAM's and i want 32second 
>>>buffer, why i cannot have that, and if i see it is really possible before?
>>
>>I know it worked before. But I can't think of a reason why anyone
>>would want a buffer that large. Why do you want to queue packets
>>for up to 64 seconds?
> 
> Seems i misunderstand how it works. If i am not wrong, till buffer available, 
> bandwidth will be given on "peakrate" speed, and when buffer is empty - on 
> "rate" speed. I am wrong?


No, I got confused, sorry about that. Your configuration allows bursts
up to 64 seconds long. I guess there's nothing wrong with that.

I already asked Stephen to revert that patch, it was not meant to
be included yet, unfortunately it made it into the release. Even
more unfortunate is that it looks like we need larger types in the
ABI to properly support nano-second resolution.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: iproute2-2.6.20-070313 bug ?
  2007-03-22 13:43             ` Patrick McHardy
@ 2007-03-22 13:47               ` Denys
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Denys @ 2007-03-22 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patrick McHardy; +Cc: Linux Netdev List, Stephen Hemminger

Hi again

On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:43:43 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote
> Denys wrote:
> >>>Another thing, it is working well 
> >>>with old tc. Just really if i have plenty of RAM's and i want 32second 
> >>>buffer, why i cannot have that, and if i see it is really possible 
before?
> >>
> >>I know it worked before. But I can't think of a reason why anyone
> >>would want a buffer that large. Why do you want to queue packets
> >>for up to 64 seconds?
> > 
> > Seems i misunderstand how it works. If i am not wrong, till buffer 
available, 
> > bandwidth will be given on "peakrate" speed, and when buffer is empty - 
on 
> > "rate" speed. I am wrong?
> 
> No, I got confused, sorry about that. Your configuration allows 
> bursts up to 64 seconds long. I guess there's nothing wrong with that.
> 
> I already asked Stephen to revert that patch, it was not meant to
> be included yet, unfortunately it made it into the release. Even
> more unfortunate is that it looks like we need larger types in the
> ABI to properly support nano-second resolution.

Thanks sir for your great help and great software and sorry that i took time, 
by not enough good explanation. 

--
Virtual ISP S.A.L.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: iproute2-2.6.20-070313 bug ?
  2007-03-22 13:09     ` Patrick McHardy
       [not found]       ` <20070322131245.M85528@visp.net.lb>
  2007-03-22 13:26       ` Denys
@ 2007-03-22 17:12       ` Stephen Hemminger
  2007-03-22 17:14         ` Patrick McHardy
                           ` (2 more replies)
  2 siblings, 3 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2007-03-22 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patrick McHardy; +Cc: Denys, netdev

On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:09:06 +0100
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> wrote:

> Denys wrote:
> > /sbin/tc2 qdisc del dev ppp0 root 
> > /sbin/tc2 qdisc add dev ppp0 root handle 1: prio 
> > /sbin/tc2 qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 handle 2: tbf buffer 1024kb latency 
> > 500ms rate 128kbit peakrate 256kbit minburst 16384 
> > /sbin/tc2 filter add dev ppp0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 10 u32 match ip dst 
> > 0.0.0.0/0 flowid 2:1 
> 
> 
> That is an incredible huge buffer value.
> 
> > qdisc tbf 2: parent 1:1 rate 128000bit burst 4294932937b peakrate
> 256000bit minburst 16Kb lat 4.2s
> 
> And it causes an overflow.
> 
> The limit for the TBF burst value with nanosecond resolution is
> ~ 4 * rate (10^9 * burst / rate < 2^32 needs to hold), resoluting
> in a worst-case latency of 4 seconds. I think this limit is in the
> reasonable range. Your configuration results in a worst-case
> queuing delay of 64s, and I doubt that you really want that.
> 
> Obviously its not good to break existing configurations, but I
> would argue that this configuration is broken.
> 


tc should check for overflows and doesn't. Do you want to make a patch
for the obvious cases?

-- 
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: iproute2-2.6.20-070313 bug ?
  2007-03-22 17:12       ` Stephen Hemminger
@ 2007-03-22 17:14         ` Patrick McHardy
  2007-03-26 18:49           ` more... iproute2/htb/whatever critical " Denys
  2007-03-31  2:26         ` more iproute2 issues (not critical) Denys
  2007-04-04  0:03         ` one more... iproute commands lockup whole system Denys
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2007-03-22 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Hemminger; +Cc: Denys, netdev

Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> tc should check for overflows and doesn't. Do you want to make a patch
> for the obvious cases?


I agree. I'll take care of it once I'm done with my patches for 2.6.22.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* more... iproute2/htb/whatever critical bug ?
  2007-03-22 17:14         ` Patrick McHardy
@ 2007-03-26 18:49           ` Denys
  2007-03-27 15:10             ` Patrick McHardy
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Denys @ 2007-03-26 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patrick McHardy, Stephen Hemminger; +Cc: netdev

Hello again

one more bug, and seems even more painful, kernel panic...


kernel 2.6.20.3

It is kind of complicated setup:

Init of shaper on ifb0 device

$TC qdisc add dev ifb0 root handle 1: htb default 1000
$TC filter add dev ifb0 parent 1:0 prio 1000 protocol ip u32 match ip dst 
0.0.0.0/0 classid 1:131

Then when interface go up

    $TC class add dev ifb0 classid 1:${id} parent 1: htb rate ${rate}bit 
quantum 1600
    $TC qdisc add dev ifb0 parent 1:${id} handle ${id}: sfq perturb 5
    $TC filter add dev ifb0 protocol ip pref ${id} parent 1: handle ${id} fw 
classid 1:${id}
    $TC qdisc del dev $2 ingress 1>/dev/null 2>/dev/null
    $TC qdisc add dev $2 ingress
    $TC filter add dev $2 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 10 u32 \
      match u32 0 0 flowid 1:1 \
      action ipt -j MARK --set-mark ${id} \
      action mirred egress redirect dev ifb0

It happens when interface (pppN) go down, commands executed in ip-down

   $TC filter del dev ifb0 protocol ip pref ${id}
   $TC class del dev ifb0 classid 1:${id}



Mar 26 23:21:11 ROUTER-75 pppd[22773]: Connection terminated.
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.481081] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL 
pointer dereference
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 at virtual address 00000074
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.481187]  printing eip:
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.481236] f8a11df1
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.481289] *pde = 00000000
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.481340] Oops: 0000 [#1]
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.481384]
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 SMP
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.481549] Modules linked in:
.... long module list
ar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.485237] CPU:    0
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.485238] EIP:    0060:[<f8a11df1>]    Not 
tainted VLI
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.485239] EFLAGS: 00010282   (2.6.20.3-build-
0001 #4)
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.485438] EIP is at htb_qlen_notify+0x9/0x79 
[sch_htb]
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.485487] eax: f3aa9800   ebx: 00000000   ecx: 
00000000   edx: 00000000
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.485594] esi: f3aa9800   edi: f8a13420   ebp: 
0000000c   esp: f22c3c40
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.485644] ds: 007b   es: 007b   ss: 0068
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.485691] Process tc (pid: 24816, ti=f22c2000 
task=f204a030 task.ti=f22c2000)
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.485741] Stack:
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 f2214000
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 f220e000
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 00000000
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 00010263
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 00000000
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 f3aa9800
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 c021b0b5
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 0000000c
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.486247]
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 f2a4c600
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 00000000
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 f3aa9800
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.486705]
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 00000000
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 f2a4c600
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 ffffffed
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 00010263
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 c02e5318
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.487226] Call Trace:
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 tc_ctl_tclass+0x144/0x1fd
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x0/0x1d2
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.488183]  [<c02144d5>]
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.488266]  [<c0220aae>]
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 netlink_data_ready+0x12/0x4c
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.488415]  [<c021fab9>]
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.488498]  [<c0220a90>]
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 netlink_sendmsg+0x23b/0x247
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.488658]  [<c0204f0c>]
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 sock_sendmsg+0xbc/0xd4
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x35
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.488913]  [<c0126545>]
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x35
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.489006]  [<c021ad27>]
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 __qdisc_run+0x2e/0x182
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.489158]  [<f8a0a03e>]
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 tcf_mirred+0x0/0x14d [act_mirred]
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.489249]  [<c020ad12>]
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 verify_iovec+0x3e/0x70
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 sys_sendmsg+0x194/0x1f9
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.489483]  [<c020585d>]
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 sys_recvmsg+0x14d/0x1cf
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.489628]  [<c0137d13>]
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 get_page_from_freelist+0x253/0x2d3
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.489717]  [<f8a2d18f>]
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 ppp_input+0xc6/0xe6 [ppp_generic]
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.489868]  [<f8a34cc4>]
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.489960]  [<c021b315>]
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 tc_classify+0x34/0xbc
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.490110]  [<f89d010b>]
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 ingress_enqueue+0x16/0x55 [sch_ingress]
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.490200]  [<c020d88b>]
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 netif_receive_skb+0x215/0x349
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.490346]  [<f8914b48>]
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 rtl8139_interrupt+0x2a1/0x3c5 [8139too]
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.490438]  [<c020f143>]
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.490907] Code:
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 83
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 24
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 ff
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 0f
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 85
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 4f
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 ff
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 ff
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 24
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 1c
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 00
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 8b
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 1c
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 20
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 5b
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 5f
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 5d
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 c3
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 56
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 c6
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 53
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 83
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 ec
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 10
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 unparseable log message: "<8b> "
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 74
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 00
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 83
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 01
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 00
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 00
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 24
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 c7
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.493934] EIP: [<f8a11df1>]
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 htb_qlen_notify+0x9/0x79 [sch_htb]
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 SS:ESP 0068:f22c3c40
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.494059]
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in 
interrupt
Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 Rebooting in 10 seconds..

One more panic

Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.699144] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL 
pointer dereference
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 at virtual address 00000074
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.699272]  printing eip:
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.699328] f8a11df1
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.699386] *pde = 00000000
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.699441] Oops: 0000 [#1]
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.699490]
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 SMP
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.699607] Modules linked in:
.... list of modules
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.702737] CPU:    1
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.702738] EIP:    0060:[<f8a11df1>]    Not 
tainted VLI
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.702740] EFLAGS: 00010282   (2.6.20.3-build-
0001 #4)
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.702889] EIP is at htb_qlen_notify+0x9/0x79 
[sch_htb]
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.702940] eax: f36d3800   ebx: 00000000   ecx: 
00000000   edx: 00000000
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.702994] esi: f36d3800   edi: f8a13420   ebp: 
0000000e   esp: f2093c40
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.703048] ds: 007b   es: 007b   ss: 0068
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.703098] Process tc (pid: 27124, ti=f2092000 
task=f2840550 task.ti=f2092000)
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.703151] Stack:
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 00000000
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 00010253
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 c021b0b5
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 0000000e
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.703509]
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 f2dd8a00
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 0000000e
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 0000001c
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 f2093ccc
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 00010000
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 f2dd8a00
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 ffffffed
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 00010253
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 00000000
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 00000000
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.704311]  [<c011ab71>]
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 tasklet_action+0x4b/0xa4
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 qdisc_tree_decrease_qlen+0x39/0x4f
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.704506]  [<f8a11ef6>]
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.705347]  [<c0220a90>]
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 netlink_sendmsg+0x23b/0x247
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 sock_sendmsg+0xbc/0xd4
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.705567]  [<c0126545>]
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.705665]  [<c0126545>]
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x35
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.705776]  [<c0126545>]
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x35
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 verify_iovec+0x3e/0x70
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.705958]  [<c02050b8>]
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 sys_sendmsg+0x194/0x1f9
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.706056]  [<c020585d>]
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.706149]  [<c0137d13>]
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 get_page_from_freelist+0x253/0x2d3
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.706264]  [<c0137de5>]
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 __alloc_pages+0x52/0x286
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 __handle_mm_fault+0x409/0x60a
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.706494]  [<c0205f58>]
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 sys_socketcall+0x223/0x242
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.706596]  [<c010f378>]
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.706681]  [<c0102c8c>]
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 sysenter_past_esp+0x5d/0x81
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.706794]  =======================
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 ff
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 c7
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 44
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 00
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 00
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 24
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 1c
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 20
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 5b
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 5d
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 c3
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 c6
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 53
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 83
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 ec
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 42
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 74
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 00
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 75
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 83
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 ba
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 00
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 00
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 24
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 c7
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 [  429.709043] EIP: [<f8a11df1>]
Mar 26 21:39:30 ROUTER-75 SS:ESP 0068:f2093c40

I am trying to remove command, that executed at interface removal, and moving 
it to ip-up stage (so when it init interface, it will try to delete old 
classes first).

--
Virtual ISP S.A.L.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: more... iproute2/htb/whatever critical bug ?
  2007-03-26 18:49           ` more... iproute2/htb/whatever critical " Denys
@ 2007-03-27 15:10             ` Patrick McHardy
  2007-03-27 15:18               ` Denys
  2007-03-27 16:00               ` Denys
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2007-03-27 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Denys; +Cc: Stephen Hemminger, netdev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1154 bytes --]

Denys wrote:
> Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.481081] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL 
> pointer dereference
> Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 at virtual address 00000074
> Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.481187]  printing eip:
> Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.481236] f8a11df1
> Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.481289] *pde = 00000000
> Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.481340] Oops: 0000 [#1]
> Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.481384]
> Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 SMP
> Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75
> Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.481549] Modules linked in:
> .... long module list
> ar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.485237] CPU:    0
> Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.485238] EIP:    0060:[<f8a11df1>]    Not 
> tainted VLI
> Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.485239] EFLAGS: 00010282   (2.6.20.3-build-
> 0001 #4)
> Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.485438] EIP is at htb_qlen_notify+0x9/0x79 
> [sch_htb]


Oops, that seems to be my fault. Can you please try the attached patch?
To reproduce the problem you need to have packets queued while the
device is going down, so please make sure that is true by flooding
the device or something like that.


[-- Attachment #2: x --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1334 bytes --]

[NET_SCHED]: sch_htb: fix oops in htb_qlen_notify

htb_delete calls qdisc_tree_decrease_qlen after removing the class from
the class hash. This makes the ->get operation in qdisc_tree_decrease_qlen
fail, so it passes a NULL pointer to htb_qlen_notify, causing an oops.

Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>

---
commit 866d03284bf4ae694c8c12c1742dde1c5c06eca7
tree e43ac244d44b2422f0acb92dc9a48a66f92c2792
parent 703071b5b93d88d5acb0edd5b9dd86c69ad970f2
author Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:07:50 +0200
committer Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:07:50 +0200

 net/sched/sch_htb.c |    6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sched/sch_htb.c b/net/sched/sch_htb.c
index 97cbb9a..3c3294d 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_htb.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_htb.c
@@ -1380,15 +1380,15 @@ static int htb_delete(struct Qdisc *sch, unsigned long arg)
 
 	sch_tree_lock(sch);
 
-	/* delete from hash and active; remainder in destroy_class */
-	hlist_del_init(&cl->hlist);
-
 	if (!cl->level) {
 		qlen = cl->un.leaf.q->q.qlen;
 		qdisc_reset(cl->un.leaf.q);
 		qdisc_tree_decrease_qlen(cl->un.leaf.q, qlen);
 	}
 
+	/* delete from hash and active; remainder in destroy_class */
+	hlist_del_init(&cl->hlist);
+
 	if (cl->prio_activity)
 		htb_deactivate(q, cl);
 

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: more... iproute2/htb/whatever critical bug ?
  2007-03-27 15:10             ` Patrick McHardy
@ 2007-03-27 15:18               ` Denys
  2007-03-27 16:00               ` Denys
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Denys @ 2007-03-27 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patrick McHardy; +Cc: Stephen Hemminger, netdev

Yes, correct, i am able to reproduce problem, i was scared i will be not able.
Just when i am killing pppd on "server" side, flooding interface, it's 
happens.

I will try patch in next 30 minutes max.

I have also bug, related to mirred to ifb0 and ethernet checksum offloading, 
but maybe it is fixed. I will try to remember, to tell about it. I dont have 
right now local computer with checksum offloading capable card, it also 
causing kernel panic, but i workaround it by ethtool, disabling feature.

On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:10:36 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote
> Denys wrote:
> > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.481081] BUG: unable to handle kernel 
NULL 
> > pointer dereference
> > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 at virtual address 00000074
> > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.481187]  printing eip:
> > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.481236] f8a11df1
> > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.481289] *pde = 00000000
> > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.481340] Oops: 0000 [#1]
> > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.481384]
> > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 SMP
> > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75
> > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.481549] Modules linked in:
> > .... long module list
> > ar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.485237] CPU:    0
> > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.485238] EIP:    0060:[<f8a11df1>]    Not 
> > tainted VLI
> > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.485239] EFLAGS: 00010282   (2.6.20.3-
build-
> > 0001 #4)
> > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.485438] EIP is at htb_qlen_notify+0x9/
0x79 
> > [sch_htb]
> 
> Oops, that seems to be my fault. Can you please try the attached patch?
> To reproduce the problem you need to have packets queued while the
> device is going down, so please make sure that is true by flooding
> the device or something like that.


--
Virtual ISP S.A.L.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: more... iproute2/htb/whatever critical bug ?
  2007-03-27 15:10             ` Patrick McHardy
  2007-03-27 15:18               ` Denys
@ 2007-03-27 16:00               ` Denys
  2007-03-27 16:21                 ` Patrick McHardy
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Denys @ 2007-03-27 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patrick McHardy; +Cc: Stephen Hemminger, netdev

Hi again

Looks like everything is fine, i will deploy at few NAS today night and will 
see if there any issues. Both oops what i gave, is it related to this bug?
No need to dig anything else?

On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:10:36 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote
> Denys wrote:
> > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.481081] BUG: unable to handle kernel 
NULL 
> > pointer dereference
> > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 at virtual address 00000074
> > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.481187]  printing eip:
> > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.481236] f8a11df1
> > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.481289] *pde = 00000000
> > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.481340] Oops: 0000 [#1]
> > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.481384]
> > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 SMP
> > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75
> > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.481549] Modules linked in:
> > .... long module list
> > ar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.485237] CPU:    0
> > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.485238] EIP:    0060:[<f8a11df1>]    Not 
> > tainted VLI
> > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.485239] EFLAGS: 00010282   (2.6.20.3-
build-
> > 0001 #4)
> > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [  551.485438] EIP is at htb_qlen_notify+0x9/
0x79 
> > [sch_htb]
> 
> Oops, that seems to be my fault. Can you please try the attached patch?
> To reproduce the problem you need to have packets queued while the
> device is going down, so please make sure that is true by flooding
> the device or something like that.


--
Virtual ISP S.A.L.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: more... iproute2/htb/whatever critical bug ?
  2007-03-27 16:00               ` Denys
@ 2007-03-27 16:21                 ` Patrick McHardy
  2007-03-28 17:38                   ` another " Denys
  2007-03-28 23:55                   ` Denys
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2007-03-27 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Denys; +Cc: Stephen Hemminger, netdev

Denys wrote:
> Hi again
> 
> Looks like everything is fine, i will deploy at few NAS today night and will 
> see if there any issues.

Thanks for testing.

> Both oops what i gave, is it related to this bug?

Yes, they were both because of the same bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* another critical bug ?
  2007-03-27 16:21                 ` Patrick McHardy
@ 2007-03-28 17:38                   ` Denys
  2007-03-28 23:55                   ` Denys
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Denys @ 2007-03-28 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev

Something more

With all kernel debug enabled it was not giving this panic (maybe cause 
system becomes too slow).

vanilla kernel 2.6.20.3 with htb patch applied, ethernet cards RTL8139

If u need anythign more - inform me. 

Not sure it is iproute2, but if you can, just point me to right direction, to 
who i need to report, it is also happening on interface flood, when i bring 
it down:

(some data not accepted by kernel maillist, changed to "*")

Mar 28 22:14:36 OFFICE-PPPOE pppoe-server[1456]: Session 1 closed for client 
00:16:ec:7e:47:ea (172.16.102.2) on eth1
Mar 28 22:14:36 OFFICE-PPPOE pppoe-server[1456]: Sent PADT
Mar 28 22:14:36 OFFICE-PPPOE pppoe-server[1456]: PADT: Generic-Error: ******
Mar 28 22:14:36 OFFICE-PPPOE pppoe-server[1456]: PADT: Generic-Error: 
Received PADT from peer
Mar 28 22:14:36 OFFICE-PPPOE pppoe-server[1456]: PADT: Generic-Error: 
*********
Mar 28 22:14:36 OFFICE-PPPOE pppoe-server[1456]: Sent PADT
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.148236] BUG: unable to handle kernel 
paging request
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE at virtual address 5b5a596c
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.148497]  printing eip:
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.148625] *pde = 00000000
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.148743] Oops: 0000 [#1]
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.148798]
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE SMP
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.148992] Modules linked in:
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE netconsole
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE xt_mac
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE xt_tcpmss
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE ipt_TCPMSS
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE ipt_REJECT
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE ts_bm
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE xt_string
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE ipt_ttl
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE ifb
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE iptable_mangle
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE xt_MARK
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE xt_mark
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE pppoe
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE pppox
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE ppp_generic
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE slhc
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE xt_tcpudp
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE em_nbyte
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE cls_tcindex
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE act_gact
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE cls_rsvp
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE sch_htb
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE cls_fw
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE act_mirred
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE em_u32
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE sch_red
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE sch_sfq
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE sch_tbf
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE sch_teql
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE cls_basic
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE sch_gred
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE act_pedit
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE sch_hfsc
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE cls_rsvp6
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE sch_ingress
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE em_meta
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE em_text
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE act_ipt
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE sch_dsmark
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE sch_prio
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE sch_netem
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE act_simple
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE cls_u32
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE em_cmp
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE sch_cbq
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE cls_route
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE iptable_nat
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE nf_conntrack_ipv4
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE ipt_LOG
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE ipt_MASQUERADE
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE ipt_REDIRECT
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE nf_nat
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE nf_conntrack
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE nfnetlink
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE iptable_filter
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE ip_tables
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE x_tables
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 8021q
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE tun
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE via_velocity
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE via_rhine
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE sis900
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE ne2k_pci
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 8390
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE skge
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE tg3
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 8139too
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE e1000
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE e100
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE block2mtd
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE usb_storage
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE mtdblock
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE mtd_blkdevs
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE usbhid
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE uhci_hcd
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE ehci_hcd
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE ohci_hcd
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE usbcore
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.153713] CPU:    0
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.153716] EIP:    0060:[<c02113c7>]    Not 
tainted VLI
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.153718] EFLAGS: 00010202   (2.6.20.3-
build-0005 #18)
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.153949] EIP is at netif_rx+0x18/0x126
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.154009] eax: c0c42800   ebx: 5b5a5958   
ecx: 00000001   edx: c6541c80
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.154073] esi: c0319800   edi: c6541c80   
ebp: c02f5f14   esp: c02f5f04
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.154135] ds: 007b   es: 007b   ss: 0068
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.154253] Process swapper (pid: 0, 
ti=c02f4000 task=c02cd440 task.ti=c02f4000)
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.154316] Stack:
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE c020c2bc
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE c0319c00
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE c0319800
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 00000007
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE c02f5f24
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE c8a1925d
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE c0319c5c
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 00000000
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.154880]
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE c02f5f34
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE c011bd9a
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 00000001
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE c02ea328
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE c02f5f4c
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE c011ba5c
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 00000000
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 00000046
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.155536]
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 00000000
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE c1105164
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE c02f5f58
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE c011baf3
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 00000011
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE c02f5f60
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE c011bcb2
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE c02f5f7c
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.156124] Call Trace:
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.156293]  [<c0103d08>]
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x2f
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.156402]  [<c0103dba>]
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE show_stack_log_lvl+0x9d/0xa5
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.156564]  [<c0103f5c>]
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE show_registers+0x19a/0x270
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.156674]  [<c010414b>]
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE die+0x119/0x231
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.156833]  [<c0110853>]
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE do_page_fault+0x443/0x51c
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.156943]  [<c026697c>]
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE error_code+0x7c/0x84
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.157119]  [<c8a1925d>]
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE ri_tasklet+0xd3/0x196 [ifb]
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.157227]  [<c011bd9a>]
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE tasklet_action+0x4e/0xa8
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.157401]  [<c011ba5c>]
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE __do_softirq+0x64/0xc6
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.157504]  [<c011baf3>]
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE do_softirq+0x35/0x3a
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.157665]  [<c011bcb2>]
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE irq_exit+0x38/0x3a
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.157768]  [<c01053b1>]
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE do_IRQ+0x8a/0x9d
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.157927]  [<c0103763>]
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE common_interrupt+0x23/0x28
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.158029]  [<c0101363>]
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE cpu_idle+0x61/0x76
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.158188]  [<c010068f>]
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE rest_init+0x23/0x28
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.158288]  [<c02f977d>]
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE start_kernel+0x387/0x38f
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.158448]  [<00000000>]
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE _stext+0x3feffc6c/0x19
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.158550]  =======================
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.158666] Code:
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE ed
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 53
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 05
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 00
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE bf
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 01
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 00
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 00
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 00
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 83
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE c4
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 1c
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 89
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE f8
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 5b
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 5e
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 5f
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 5d
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE c3
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 55
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 89
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE e5
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 57
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 89
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE c7
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 56
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 53
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 83
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE ec
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 04
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 8b
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 40
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 14
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 8b
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 98
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE e4
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 02
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 00
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 00
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 85
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE db
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 74
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 38
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 7b
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 14
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 00
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 75
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 06
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 83
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 7b
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 0c
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 00
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 74
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 2c
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 8d
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 73
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 10
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 89
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE f0
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE e8
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 3d
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 53
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE 05
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.162385] EIP: [<c02113c7>]
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE netif_rx+0x18/0x126
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE SS:ESP 0068:c02f5f04
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.162594]
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in 
interrupt
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE [ 1758.162719]
Mar 28 20:13:29 OFFICE-PPPOE Rebooting in 10 seconds..



--
Virtual ISP S.A.L.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* another critical bug ?
  2007-03-27 16:21                 ` Patrick McHardy
  2007-03-28 17:38                   ` another " Denys
@ 2007-03-28 23:55                   ` Denys
  2007-03-29 10:58                     ` Patrick McHardy
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Denys @ 2007-03-28 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patrick McHardy; +Cc: Stephen Hemminger, netdev

Tried on 2.6.21-rc5-git3, but preempt enabled
Same panic, same place seems

Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.644102] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging 
request
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX at virtual address 0302014c
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.644242]  printing eip:
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.644301] *pde = 00000000
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.644371] Oops: 0000 [#1]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.644485] PREEMPT
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX SMP
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.644629] Modules linked in:
.... LIST OF MODULES ....
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.648758] CPU:    0
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.648760] EIP:    0060:[<c0216e37>]    Not tainted 
VLI
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.648762] EFLAGS: 00010206   (2.6.20.3-build-0002 
#14)
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.648948] EIP is at netif_rx+0x12/0x115
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.649011] eax: c33fb000   ebx: 03020100   ecx: 
00000001   edx: c3380d80
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.649078] esi: c4cfc000   edi: c3380d80   ebp: 
00000000   esp: c7fb7f74
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.649144] ds: 007b   es: 007b   ss: 0068   
preempt: 00000001
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.649210] Process softirq-tasklet (pid: 9, 
ti=c7fb6000 task=c7f9f000 task.ti=c7fb6000)
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.649276] Stack:
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX c4cfc400
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX c4cfc000
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 00000000
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX c8a1f268
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX c4cfc45c
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 000f4240
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 00000000
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX c011c5d8
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.649754]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX c7fb7fac
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX c026ba53
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 00000006
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX c11c5c98
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX c11c5c98
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 00000020
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX c011cadf
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX c011cbc9
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.650231]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 00000000
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 00000001
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX c7fb7fc0
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 00000032
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX c11c5c98
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX c7fa1ef8
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX c0128757
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX ffffffff
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.650707] Call Trace:
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.650829]  [<c8a1f268>]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX ri_tasklet+0xd5/0x1a1 [ifb]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.650954]  [<c011c5d8>]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX __tasklet_action+0xe5/0x126
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.651073]  [<c026ba53>]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX schedule+0xe0/0xfa
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.651201]  [<c011cadf>]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX ksoftirqd+0x0/0x178
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.651312]  [<c011cbc9>]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX ksoftirqd+0xea/0x178
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.651443]  [<c0128757>]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX kthread+0xb2/0xdb
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.651560]  [<c01286a5>]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX kthread+0x0/0xdb
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.651683]  [<c0103a5f>]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.651823]  =======================
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.651890] Code:
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 00
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX eb
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 0c
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 89
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX d8
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX e8
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 7a
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 5e
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 05
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 00
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX e9
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX bb
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX fe
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX ff
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX ff
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 83
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX c4
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 14
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 89
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX f0
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 5b
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 5e
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 5f
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 5d
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX c3
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 57
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 89
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX c7
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 56
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 53
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 8b
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 40
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 14
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 8b
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 98
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX e4
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 02
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 00
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 00
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 85
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX db
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 74
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 32
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 7b
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 4c
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 00
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 75
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 06
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 83
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 7b
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 28
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 00
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 74
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 26
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 8d
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 73
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 2c
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 89
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX f0
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX e8
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 65
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 5e
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX 05
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.654978] EIP: [<c0216e37>]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX netif_rx+0x12/0x115
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX SS:ESP 0068:c7fb7f74
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.655137]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.655280]  [<c0118387>]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX panic+0x50/0xf1
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.655433]  [<c0104327>]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX die+0x207/0x23b
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.655644]  [<c0110879>]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX do_page_fault+0x46c/0x543
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.655803]  [<c026b781>]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX __sched_text_start+0xba1/0xcc8
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.655973]  [<c011040d>]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX do_page_fault+0x0/0x543
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.656114]  [<c026d304>]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX error_code+0x7c/0x84
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.656305]  [<c0216e37>]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX netif_rx+0x12/0x115
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.656462]  [<c8a1f268>]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX ri_tasklet+0xd5/0x1a1 [ifb]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.656609]  [<c011c5d8>]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX __tasklet_action+0xe5/0x126
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.656746]  [<c026ba53>]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX schedule+0xe0/0xfa
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.656893]  [<c011cadf>]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX ksoftirqd+0x0/0x178
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.657023]  [<c011cbc9>]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX ksoftirqd+0xea/0x178
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.657190]  [<c0128757>]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX kthread+0xb2/0xdb
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.657328]  [<c01286a5>]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX kthread+0x0/0xdb
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.657466]  [<c0103a5f>]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.657628]  =======================
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.657703]
Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX Rebooting in 10 seconds..



--
Virtual ISP S.A.L.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: another critical bug ?
  2007-03-28 23:55                   ` Denys
@ 2007-03-29 10:58                     ` Patrick McHardy
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2007-03-29 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Denys; +Cc: Stephen Hemminger, netdev

Denys wrote:
> Tried on 2.6.21-rc5-git3, but preempt enabled
> Same panic, same place seems
> 
> Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.644102] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging 
> request
> Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX at virtual address 0302014c

> Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.648948] EIP is at netif_rx+0x12/0x115
>[...]
> Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX [  164.650829]  [<c8a1f268>]
> Mar 29 02:50:53 LINUX ri_tasklet+0xd5/0x1a1 [ifb]


Its somehow related to ifb. Please send your .config and the commands
you use to setup ifb.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* more iproute2 issues (not critical)
  2007-03-22 17:12       ` Stephen Hemminger
  2007-03-22 17:14         ` Patrick McHardy
@ 2007-03-31  2:26         ` Denys
  2007-03-31  2:31           ` Denys
  2007-04-04  0:03         ` one more... iproute commands lockup whole system Denys
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Denys @ 2007-03-31  2:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Hemminger, Patrick McHardy; +Cc: netdev

While running tc monitor

defaulthost ~ #/sbin/tc2 monitor
qdisc prio 1: dev if92 root bands 3 priomap  1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
qdisc tbf 2: dev if92 parent 1:1 rate 121600bit burst 512Kb peakrate 1280Kbit 
minburst 16Kb lat 500.0ms
filter dev if92 parent 1: protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 800::800 order 2048 key 
ht 800 bkt 0 flowid 3:1
  match c2929918/ffffffff at 12
filter dev if92 parent 1: protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 800::801 order 2049 key 
ht 800 bkt 0 flowid 3:1
  match c292991a/ffffffff at 12
filter dev if92 parent 1: protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 800::802 order 2050 key 
ht 800 bkt 0 flowid 3:1
  match 02020266/ffffffff at 12
filter dev if92 parent 1: protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 800::803 order 2051 key 
ht 800 bkt 0 flowid 3:1
  match 02020269/ffffffff at 12
filter dev if92 parent 1: protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 800::804 order 2052 key 
ht 800 bkt 0 flowid 3:1
  match 0202026a/ffffffff at 12
filter dev if92 parent 1: protocol ip pref 10 u32 fh 801::800 order 2048 key 
ht 801 bkt 0 flowid 2:1
  match 00000000/00000000 at 16
deleted filter dev ifb0 parent 1: protocol ip pref 117 fw
deleted class htb 1:117 dev ifb0 root leaf 117: prio 0 rate 32000bit ceil 
32000bit burst 1604b cburst 1604b
class htb 1:117 dev ifb0 root prio 0 rate 32000bit ceil 32000bit burst 1604b 
cburst 1604b
qdisc sfq 117: dev ifb0 parent 1:117 limit 128p quantum 1514b perturb 5sec
filter dev ifb0 parent 1: protocol ip pref 117 fw handle 0x75 classid 1:117
qdisc ingress ffff: dev if92 parent ffff:fff1 ----------------
filter dev if92 parent ffff: protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 800::800 order 2048 
key ht 800 bkt 0 flowid 1:1
  match 02020266/ffffffff at 16
filter dev if92 parent ffff: protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 800::801 order 2049 
key ht 800 bkt 0 flowid 1:1
  match 02020269/ffffffff at 16
filter dev if92 parent ffff: protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 800::802 order 2050 
key ht 800 bkt 0 flowid 1:1
  match 0202026a/ffffffff at 16
filter dev if92 parent ffff: protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 800::803 order 2051 
key ht 800 bkt 0 flowid 1:1
  match c2929918/ffffffff at 16
filter dev if92 parent ffff: protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 800::804 order 2052 
key ht 800 bkt 0 flowid 1:1
  match c292991a/ffffffff at 16
filter dev if92 parent ffff: protocol ip pref 10 u32 fh 801::800 order 2048 
key ht 801 bkt 0 flowid 1:1
  match 00000000/00000000 at 0
        action order 1: tablename: mangle  hook: NF_IP_PRE_ROUTING
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0  0x08069f38 in get_target_name (name=0xbfa397f2 "MARK") at m_ipt.c:219
219             char path[strlen(lib_dir) + sizeof ("/libipt_.so") + 
strlen(name)];

Do you need "bt full" ?
Compiled from git tree, but not latest (a little bit more fresh than latest 
release).



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: more iproute2 issues (not critical)
  2007-03-31  2:26         ` more iproute2 issues (not critical) Denys
@ 2007-03-31  2:31           ` Denys
  2007-03-31 14:16             ` Patrick McHardy
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Denys @ 2007-03-31  2:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Denys, Stephen Hemminger, Patrick McHardy; +Cc: netdev

Ooops, sorry, it seems my fault, no library exist on this system.
But i guess it must not coredump in this case? Is it possible to check if 
library not exist and just print some nice message?
It is trivial i guess.

On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 05:26:00 +0300, Denys wrote
> While running tc monitor
> 
> defaulthost ~ #/sbin/tc2 monitor
> qdisc prio 1: dev if92 root bands 3 priomap  1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 
> 1 1 1 1 qdisc tbf 2: dev if92 parent 1:1 rate 121600bit burst 512Kb 
> peakrate 1280Kbit minburst 16Kb lat 500.0ms filter dev if92 parent 
> 1: protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 800::800 order 2048 key ht 800 bkt 0 
> flowid 3:1  match c2929918/ffffffff at 12 filter dev if92 parent 1: 
> protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 800::801 order 2049 key ht 800 bkt 0 
> flowid 3:1  match c292991a/ffffffff at 12 filter dev if92 parent 1: 
> protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 800::802 order 2050 key ht 800 bkt 0 
> flowid 3:1  match 02020266/ffffffff at 12 filter dev if92 parent 1: 
> protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 800::803 order 2051 key ht 800 bkt 0 
> flowid 3:1  match 02020269/ffffffff at 12 filter dev if92 parent 1: 
> protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 800::804 order 2052 key ht 800 bkt 0 
> flowid 3:1  match 0202026a/ffffffff at 12 filter dev if92 parent 1: 
> protocol ip pref 10 u32 fh 801::800 order 2048 key ht 801 bkt 0 
> flowid 2:1  match 00000000/00000000 at 16 deleted filter dev ifb0 
> parent 1: protocol ip pref 117 fw deleted class htb 1:117 dev ifb0 
> root leaf 117: prio 0 rate 32000bit ceil 32000bit burst 1604b cburst 
> 1604b class htb 1:117 dev ifb0 root prio 0 rate 32000bit ceil 
> 32000bit burst 1604b cburst 1604b qdisc sfq 117: dev ifb0 parent 
> 1:117 limit 128p quantum 1514b perturb 5sec filter dev ifb0 parent 
> 1: protocol ip pref 117 fw handle 0x75 classid 1:117 qdisc ingress 
> ffff: dev if92 parent ffff:fff1 ---------------- filter dev if92 
> parent ffff: protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 800::800 order 2048 key ht 
> 800 bkt 0 flowid 1:1  match 02020266/ffffffff at 16 filter dev if92 
> parent ffff: protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 800::801 order 2049 key ht 
> 800 bkt 0 flowid 1:1  match 02020269/ffffffff at 16 filter dev if92 
> parent ffff: protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 800::802 order 2050 key ht 
> 800 bkt 0 flowid 1:1  match 0202026a/ffffffff at 16 filter dev if92 
> parent ffff: protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 800::803 order 2051 key ht 
> 800 bkt 0 flowid 1:1  match c2929918/ffffffff at 16 filter dev if92 
> parent ffff: protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 800::804 order 2052 key ht 
> 800 bkt 0 flowid 1:1  match c292991a/ffffffff at 16 filter dev if92 
> parent ffff: protocol ip pref 10 u32 fh 801::800 order 2048 key ht 
> 801 bkt 0 flowid 1:1  match 00000000/00000000 at 0        action 
> order 1: tablename: mangle  hook: NF_IP_PRE_ROUTING Segmentation 
> fault (core dumped)
> 
> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
> #0  0x08069f38 in get_target_name (name=0xbfa397f2 "MARK") at m_ipt.c:219
> 219             char path[strlen(lib_dir) + sizeof ("/libipt_.so") + 
> strlen(name)];
> 
> Do you need "bt full" ?
> Compiled from git tree, but not latest (a little bit more fresh than 
> latest release).
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
Virtual ISP S.A.L.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: more iproute2 issues (not critical)
  2007-03-31  2:31           ` Denys
@ 2007-03-31 14:16             ` Patrick McHardy
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2007-03-31 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Denys; +Cc: Stephen Hemminger, netdev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 328 bytes --]

Denys wrote:
> Ooops, sorry, it seems my fault, no library exist on this system.
> But i guess it must not coredump in this case? Is it possible to check if 
> library not exist and just print some nice message?
> It is trivial i guess.


The problem is that lib_dir is NULL when calling get_target_names.
This patch fixes it.


[-- Attachment #2: x --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 957 bytes --]

[IPROUTE]: m_ipt: fix crash when dumping rules

lib_dir is NULL when calling get_target_name, causing a NULL pointer
dereference in the strlen call.

Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>

---
commit 5093ef7504b7f3d76ec421c5193d11d0e9791a8d
tree 4dfa97ecd6aa01f33334f605f152a0d7da2ccde9
parent ab4c2f14fb93700c9aefeb02ed9918565ba332a1
author Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:14:38 +0200
committer Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:14:38 +0200

 tc/m_ipt.c |    4 ++++
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tc/m_ipt.c b/tc/m_ipt.c
index 38d2311..76fa768 100644
--- a/tc/m_ipt.c
+++ b/tc/m_ipt.c
@@ -506,6 +506,10 @@ print_ipt(struct action_util *au,FILE * f, struct rtattr *arg)
 	if (arg == NULL)
 		return -1;
 
+	lib_dir = getenv("IPTABLES_LIB_DIR");
+	if (!lib_dir)
+		lib_dir = IPT_LIB_DIR;
+
 	parse_rtattr_nested(tb, TCA_IPT_MAX, arg);
 
 	if (tb[TCA_IPT_TABLE] == NULL) {

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* one more... iproute commands lockup whole system
  2007-03-22 17:12       ` Stephen Hemminger
  2007-03-22 17:14         ` Patrick McHardy
  2007-03-31  2:26         ` more iproute2 issues (not critical) Denys
@ 2007-04-04  0:03         ` Denys
  2007-04-04  1:10           ` jamal
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Denys @ 2007-04-04  0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Hemminger, Patrick McHardy; +Cc: netdev

I'm not sure it is mistake or error, but i feel it is dangerous, cause 
commands locking up the system, no kernel panic, no oops, so only watchdog 
can save poor server (and not sure this even)

Commands to lockup system (just i am giving my example, i didnt sort out what 
exactly locked up system, i guess redirecting to eth0.5, which is not 
intended for that):

vconfig add eth0 5
ifconfig eth0.5 192.168.1.2 netmask 255.255.255.128

tc qdisc add dev eth0 ingress
tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 6 u32 \
match ip src 195.69.208.252/32 flowid 1:16 \
action police rate 64kbit burst 90k pipe \
action mirred egress mirror dev eth0.5

--
Denys Fedoryshchenko
Technical Manager
Virtual ISP S.A.L.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: one more... iproute commands lockup whole system
  2007-04-04  0:03         ` one more... iproute commands lockup whole system Denys
@ 2007-04-04  1:10           ` jamal
  2007-04-04  1:39             ` Patrick McHardy
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: jamal @ 2007-04-04  1:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Denys; +Cc: Stephen Hemminger, Patrick McHardy, netdev



On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 03:03 +0300, Denys wrote:
> I'm not sure it is mistake or error, but i feel it is dangerous, cause 
> commands locking up the system, no kernel panic, no oops, so only watchdog 
> can save poor server (and not sure this even)
> 
> Commands to lockup system (just i am giving my example, i didnt sort out what 
> exactly locked up system, i guess redirecting to eth0.5, which is not 
> intended for that):
> 

read:
doc/actions/mirred-usage

cheers,
jamal


> vconfig add eth0 5
> ifconfig eth0.5 192.168.1.2 netmask 255.255.255.128
> 
> tc qdisc add dev eth0 ingress
> tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 6 u32 \
> match ip src 195.69.208.252/32 flowid 1:16 \
> action police rate 64kbit burst 90k pipe \
> action mirred egress mirror dev eth0.5
> 
> --
> Denys Fedoryshchenko
> Technical Manager
> Virtual ISP S.A.L.
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: one more... iproute commands lockup whole system
  2007-04-04  1:10           ` jamal
@ 2007-04-04  1:39             ` Patrick McHardy
  2007-04-04  2:09               ` jamal
  2007-04-04  2:11               ` Denys
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2007-04-04  1:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: hadi; +Cc: Denys, Stephen Hemminger, netdev

jamal wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 03:03 +0300, Denys wrote:
> 
>>I'm not sure it is mistake or error, but i feel it is dangerous, cause 
>>commands locking up the system, no kernel panic, no oops, so only watchdog 
>>can save poor server (and not sure this even)
>>
>>Commands to lockup system (just i am giving my example, i didnt sort out what 
>>exactly locked up system, i guess redirecting to eth0.5, which is not 
>>intended for that):
> 
> 
> read:
> doc/actions/mirred-usage


Are you refering to "What NOT to do if you dont want your machine to
crash:"? I think we should make sure users can't even accidentally
crash their box, so this should at least be caught at runtime.
I thought the TTL stuff was intended to avoid this ..


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: one more... iproute commands lockup whole system
  2007-04-04  1:39             ` Patrick McHardy
@ 2007-04-04  2:09               ` jamal
  2007-04-04  2:11               ` Denys
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: jamal @ 2007-04-04  2:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patrick McHardy; +Cc: Denys, Stephen Hemminger, netdev

On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 03:39 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:

> Are you refering to "What NOT to do if you dont want your machine to
> crash:"? 

yes.

> I think we should make sure users can't even accidentally
> crash their box, so this should at least be caught at runtime.

It is hard to do without penalizing the common use. Hence
the documentation. 
Sometimes - that is the most sane thing to do. 

>I thought the TTL stuff was intended to avoid this ..

The problem is recursive dev queue locking of the same device.  
TTL is not very helpful there.

I dont want to rehash all those discussions we already had; so if you
have a clever way to fix this (without affecting performance of a sane
user), please send a patch and lets discuss.

cheers,
jamal


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: one more... iproute commands lockup whole system
  2007-04-04  1:39             ` Patrick McHardy
  2007-04-04  2:09               ` jamal
@ 2007-04-04  2:11               ` Denys
  2007-04-04 10:55                 ` jamal
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Denys @ 2007-04-04  2:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patrick McHardy, hadi; +Cc: Stephen Hemminger, netdev

I think this highly useful feature given by jamal, difficult to be avoided 
from crash, if user not enough experienced in networking(like me). I guess 
packet can be even not ipv4/ipv6 packet, maybe it can be cloned IPX or ARP, 
so TTL field cannot be used. I checked maybe sk_buff have some fields, seems 
also bad luck, if there can be something like "internal" counter for packet, 
how much times it got redirected, it will help. But in my case of VLAN's it 
is really my own mistake and difficult to avoid it. Only bad thing - machine 
got completely locked up, and if it is remote system - it will not oops/or 
reboot even. But i dont have any idea in mind how to avoid this, only than 
big warning in DOC and internal iproute2 help :-)

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 03:39:12 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote
> jamal wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 03:03 +0300, Denys wrote:
> > 
> >>I'm not sure it is mistake or error, but i feel it is dangerous, cause 
> >>commands locking up the system, no kernel panic, no oops, so only 
watchdog 
> >>can save poor server (and not sure this even)
> >>
> >>Commands to lockup system (just i am giving my example, i didnt sort out 
what 
> >>exactly locked up system, i guess redirecting to eth0.5, which is not 
> >>intended for that):
> > 
> > 
> > read:
> > doc/actions/mirred-usage
> 
> Are you refering to "What NOT to do if you dont want your machine to
> crash:"? I think we should make sure users can't even accidentally
> crash their box, so this should at least be caught at runtime.
> I thought the TTL stuff was intended to avoid this ..
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
Denys Fedoryshchenko
Technical Manager
Virtual ISP S.A.L.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: one more... iproute commands lockup whole system
  2007-04-04  2:11               ` Denys
@ 2007-04-04 10:55                 ` jamal
  2007-04-04 12:56                   ` Denys
  2007-04-04 13:36                   ` one more... iproute commands lockup whole system Patrick McHardy
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: jamal @ 2007-04-04 10:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Denys; +Cc: Patrick McHardy, Stephen Hemminger, netdev


On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 05:11 +0300, Denys wrote:
> I think this highly useful feature given by jamal, difficult to be avoided 
> from crash, if user not enough experienced in networking(like me). I guess 
> packet can be even not ipv4/ipv6 packet, maybe it can be cloned IPX or ARP, 
> so TTL field cannot be used. I checked maybe sk_buff have some fields, seems 
> also bad luck, if there can be something like "internal" counter for packet, 
> how much times it got redirected, it will help. 

Adding a field in the skb that keeps track of things would work well,
but would be a controvesial thing to do because it actually requires a
vector not just one field. There is a filed called cb[] but it cant be
used in this case because every time we redirect it could be trampled.

> But in my case of VLAN's it 
> is really my own mistake and difficult to avoid it. Only bad thing - machine 
> got completely locked up, and if it is remote system - it will not oops/or 
> reboot even. But i dont have any idea in mind how to avoid this, only than 
> big warning in DOC and internal iproute2 help :-)

Your case is easy to detect in user space because it is within the same
policy.
Would simple detection and rejection in tc/userspace be useful to add?
Note, this doesnt help the general problem though where you have nesting
as described in the document.

cheers,
jamal


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: one more... iproute commands lockup whole system
  2007-04-04 10:55                 ` jamal
@ 2007-04-04 12:56                   ` Denys
  2007-04-04 14:10                     ` jamal
  2007-04-04 14:13                     ` HTB/act_mirred problem [was: one more... iproute commands lockup whole system] Patrick McHardy
  2007-04-04 13:36                   ` one more... iproute commands lockup whole system Patrick McHardy
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Denys @ 2007-04-04 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: hadi; +Cc: Patrick McHardy, Stephen Hemminger, netdev

Well, my case is my own mistake, i guess it is just misconfiguration, not 
actual bug. And also it is good push for me "read doc's and think well before 
adding rules".
Maybe it can be in TODO, but it is not N1 priority i guess. There is more 
important things, what u want to do. Another thing, adding one more field in 
skb will add more overhead to whole kernel(i guess).

I have some interesting thing:

Rules:
tc qdisc del dev eth0.5 root
tc qdisc add dev eth0.5 handle 1: root htb
tc class add dev eth0.5 parent 1:0 classid 1:2 htb rate 128Kbit

tc qdisc add dev eth0.5 parent 1:2 handle 2: prio

tc filter add dev eth0.5 parent 1: protocol ip prio 10 u32 \
match ip src 195.69.208.253/32 flowid 1:2

tc filter add dev eth0.5 parent 2: protocol ip prio 10 u32 \
    match ip src 195.69.208.253/32 flowid 2:1 \
    action mirred egress redirect dev eth0.6

(it is not working, but just i tried few things)

At morning i wakeup and see in dmesg, also not sure if it's bug or result of 
misconfiguration:

[46632.941527] KERNEL: assertion (!cl->level && cl->un.leaf.q && cl-
>un.leaf.q->q.qlen) failed at net/sched/sch_htb.c (585)
[46633.270732] KERNEL: assertion (!cl->level && cl->un.leaf.q && cl-
>un.leaf.q->q.qlen) failed at net/sched/sch_htb.c (585)
[46633.379446] KERNEL: assertion (!cl->level && cl->un.leaf.q && cl-
>un.leaf.q->q.qlen) failed at net/sched/sch_htb.c (585)
[46633.450751] KERNEL: assertion (!cl->level && cl->un.leaf.q && cl-
>un.leaf.q->q.qlen) failed at net/sched/sch_htb.c (585)
[46633.570702] KERNEL: assertion (!cl->level && cl->un.leaf.q && cl-
>un.leaf.q->q.qlen) failed at net/sched/sch_htb.c (585)



On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 06:55:14 -0400, jamal wrote
> On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 05:11 +0300, Denys wrote:
> > I think this highly useful feature given by jamal, difficult to be 
avoided 
> > from crash, if user not enough experienced in networking(like me). I 
guess 
> > packet can be even not ipv4/ipv6 packet, maybe it can be cloned IPX or 
ARP, 
> > so TTL field cannot be used. I checked maybe sk_buff have some fields, 
seems 
> > also bad luck, if there can be something like "internal" counter for 
packet, 
> > how much times it got redirected, it will help.
> 
> Adding a field in the skb that keeps track of things would work well,
> but would be a controvesial thing to do because it actually requires 
> a vector not just one field. There is a filed called cb[] but it 
> cant be used in this case because every time we redirect it could be 
> trampled.
> 
> > But in my case of VLAN's it 
> > is really my own mistake and difficult to avoid it. Only bad thing - 
machine 
> > got completely locked up, and if it is remote system - it will not oops/
or 
> > reboot even. But i dont have any idea in mind how to avoid this, only 
than 
> > big warning in DOC and internal iproute2 help :-)
> 
> Your case is easy to detect in user space because it is within the same
> policy.
> Would simple detection and rejection in tc/userspace be useful to 
> add? Note, this doesnt help the general problem though where you 
> have nesting as described in the document.
> 
> cheers,
> jamal
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
Denys Fedoryshchenko
Technical Manager
Virtual ISP S.A.L.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: one more... iproute commands lockup whole system
  2007-04-04 10:55                 ` jamal
  2007-04-04 12:56                   ` Denys
@ 2007-04-04 13:36                   ` Patrick McHardy
  2007-04-04 13:58                     ` jamal
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2007-04-04 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: hadi; +Cc: Denys, Stephen Hemminger, netdev

jamal wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 05:11 +0300, Denys wrote:
> 
>>I think this highly useful feature given by jamal, difficult to be avoided 
>>from crash, if user not enough experienced in networking(like me). I guess 
>>packet can be even not ipv4/ipv6 packet, maybe it can be cloned IPX or ARP, 
>>so TTL field cannot be used.


We have a loop counter (RTTL) in tc_verd. For some reason it is reset
after ing_filter though.

> I checked maybe sk_buff have some fields, seems 
>>also bad luck, if there can be something like "internal" counter for packet, 
>>how much times it got redirected, it will help. 
> 
> 
> Adding a field in the skb that keeps track of things would work well,
> but would be a controvesial thing to do because it actually requires a
> vector not just one field. There is a filed called cb[] but it cant be
> used in this case because every time we redirect it could be trampled.


It would be interesting to find out what the problem is exactly.
The configuration itself looks harmless, so I'm guessing its
rather a deadlock than a loop.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: one more... iproute commands lockup whole system
  2007-04-04 13:36                   ` one more... iproute commands lockup whole system Patrick McHardy
@ 2007-04-04 13:58                     ` jamal
  2007-04-04 14:07                       ` Patrick McHardy
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: jamal @ 2007-04-04 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patrick McHardy; +Cc: Denys, Stephen Hemminger, netdev

On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 15:36 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:

> 
> We have a loop counter (RTTL) in tc_verd. For some reason it is reset
> after ing_filter though.
> 

Essentially it is valuable just to avoid a lot of stacking (separate
issue) and not to avoid the locking issue he is seeing.


> It would be interesting to find out what the problem is exactly.
> The configuration itself looks harmless, so I'm guessing its
> rather a deadlock than a loop.

We know it is a deadlock. 
If you redirect the first time queue lock for eth0 will be held, before
it is released if you do another redirect, it will again be heading
towards eth0 and it will deadlock on grabbing the queue lock.

cheers,
jamal


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: one more... iproute commands lockup whole system
  2007-04-04 13:58                     ` jamal
@ 2007-04-04 14:07                       ` Patrick McHardy
  2007-04-04 14:30                         ` jamal
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2007-04-04 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: hadi; +Cc: Denys, Stephen Hemminger, netdev

jamal wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 15:36 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> 
>>It would be interesting to find out what the problem is exactly.
>>The configuration itself looks harmless, so I'm guessing its
>>rather a deadlock than a loop.
> 
> 
> We know it is a deadlock. 
> If you redirect the first time queue lock for eth0 will be held, before
> it is released if you do another redirect, it will again be heading
> towards eth0 and it will deadlock on grabbing the queue lock.


He only used a single redirect to eth0.5, but its probably due to the
fact that the VLAN hard_start_xmit function transmits on eth0 again.
How about adding something like ifb's ri_tasklet to act_mirred?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: one more... iproute commands lockup whole system
  2007-04-04 12:56                   ` Denys
@ 2007-04-04 14:10                     ` jamal
  2007-04-04 14:35                       ` Denys
  2007-04-04 14:13                     ` HTB/act_mirred problem [was: one more... iproute commands lockup whole system] Patrick McHardy
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: jamal @ 2007-04-04 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Denys; +Cc: Patrick McHardy, Stephen Hemminger, netdev

On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 15:56 +0300, Denys wrote:

> Rules:
> tc qdisc del dev eth0.5 root
> tc qdisc add dev eth0.5 handle 1: root htb
> tc class add dev eth0.5 parent 1:0 classid 1:2 htb rate 128Kbit
> 
> tc qdisc add dev eth0.5 parent 1:2 handle 2: prio
> 
> tc filter add dev eth0.5 parent 1: protocol ip prio 10 u32 \
> match ip src 195.69.208.253/32 flowid 1:2
> 
> tc filter add dev eth0.5 parent 2: protocol ip prio 10 u32 \
>     match ip src 195.69.208.253/32 flowid 2:1 \
>     action mirred egress redirect dev eth0.6
>
> (it is not working, but just i tried few things)
> 

This will still mean the physical device is eventually going to be 
eth0. You are hanging, correct?
If you redirected to another vlan ontop of a different physical
ethernet, and the problem persists then it will be worrisome.
Actually i am begining to doubt myself. Maybe the vlan device is acting
strangely. I will try to test your simple setup towards the end of day
and see what happens.

cheers,
jamal





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: HTB/act_mirred problem [was: one more... iproute commands lockup whole system]
  2007-04-04 12:56                   ` Denys
  2007-04-04 14:10                     ` jamal
@ 2007-04-04 14:13                     ` Patrick McHardy
  2007-04-04 14:33                       ` jamal
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2007-04-04 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Denys; +Cc: hadi, Stephen Hemminger, netdev

Denys wrote:
> I have some interesting thing:
> 
> Rules:
> tc qdisc del dev eth0.5 root
> tc qdisc add dev eth0.5 handle 1: root htb
> tc class add dev eth0.5 parent 1:0 classid 1:2 htb rate 128Kbit
> 
> tc qdisc add dev eth0.5 parent 1:2 handle 2: prio
> 
> tc filter add dev eth0.5 parent 1: protocol ip prio 10 u32 \
> match ip src 195.69.208.253/32 flowid 1:2
> 
> tc filter add dev eth0.5 parent 2: protocol ip prio 10 u32 \
>     match ip src 195.69.208.253/32 flowid 2:1 \
>     action mirred egress redirect dev eth0.6
> 
> (it is not working, but just i tried few things)
> 
> At morning i wakeup and see in dmesg, also not sure if it's bug or result of 
> misconfiguration:
> 
> [46632.941527] KERNEL: assertion (!cl->level && cl->un.leaf.q && cl-
> 
>>un.leaf.q->q.qlen) failed at net/sched/sch_htb.c (585)


This seems to be due to be caused by act_mirred returning TC_ACT_STOLEN,
which is translated to NET_XMIT_SUCCESS within prio, causing HTB to
increase the q.qlen counter and activating the class despite no packet
beeing queued.

Jamal, we can't return NET_XMIT_SUCCESS unless we've really queued the
packet. I can't remeber the reason why this is done, could you remind
me?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: one more... iproute commands lockup whole system
  2007-04-04 14:07                       ` Patrick McHardy
@ 2007-04-04 14:30                         ` jamal
  2007-04-04 14:39                           ` Patrick McHardy
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: jamal @ 2007-04-04 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patrick McHardy; +Cc: Denys, Stephen Hemminger, netdev

On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 16:07 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:

> He only used a single redirect to eth0.5, but its probably due to the
> fact that the VLAN hard_start_xmit function transmits on eth0 again.

Ok, that validates what i was saying earlier then - so i dont need to
run the test.

> How about adding something like ifb's ri_tasklet to act_mirred?

You mean having a tasklet or the constraint checks?

cheers,
jamal


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: HTB/act_mirred problem [was: one more... iproute commands lockup whole system]
  2007-04-04 14:13                     ` HTB/act_mirred problem [was: one more... iproute commands lockup whole system] Patrick McHardy
@ 2007-04-04 14:33                       ` jamal
  2007-04-04 14:50                         ` Patrick McHardy
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: jamal @ 2007-04-04 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patrick McHardy; +Cc: Denys, Stephen Hemminger, netdev

On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 16:13 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:

> This seems to be due to be caused by act_mirred returning TC_ACT_STOLEN,
> which is translated to NET_XMIT_SUCCESS within prio, causing HTB to
> increase the q.qlen counter and activating the class despite no packet
> beeing queued.
> 
> Jamal, we can't return NET_XMIT_SUCCESS unless we've really queued the
> packet. I can't remeber the reason why this is done, could you remind
> me?

IIRC, It had to do with not confusing TCP to try and retransmit. I can
go back and look at my notes to be certain. At one point i posted those
notes, it maybe time to add them to the kernel code or doc somewhere.

cheers,
jamal

PS:- i may a little slow in responding for the next few hours.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: one more... iproute commands lockup whole system
  2007-04-04 14:10                     ` jamal
@ 2007-04-04 14:35                       ` Denys
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Denys @ 2007-04-04 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: hadi; +Cc: Patrick McHardy, Stephen Hemminger, netdev

Yes, it is real setup by the way, i just copy&paste script here. I tried to 
remove some commands to leave only minimum to reproduce the problem.
Right now i dont have another ethernet card on that system, i will add it 
today, when i come back home and i will test in different situations. Also it 
is interesting, how system will act when i will redirect from eth0 to ppp0, 
tunnels, device with hardware offloading to device without hardware 
offloading and etc.

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:10:10 -0400, jamal wrote
> On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 15:56 +0300, Denys wrote:
> 
> > Rules:
> > tc qdisc del dev eth0.5 root
> > tc qdisc add dev eth0.5 handle 1: root htb
> > tc class add dev eth0.5 parent 1:0 classid 1:2 htb rate 128Kbit
> > 
> > tc qdisc add dev eth0.5 parent 1:2 handle 2: prio
> > 
> > tc filter add dev eth0.5 parent 1: protocol ip prio 10 u32 \
> > match ip src 195.69.208.253/32 flowid 1:2
> > 
> > tc filter add dev eth0.5 parent 2: protocol ip prio 10 u32 \
> >     match ip src 195.69.208.253/32 flowid 2:1 \
> >     action mirred egress redirect dev eth0.6
> >
> > (it is not working, but just i tried few things)
> >
> 
> This will still mean the physical device is eventually going to be 
> eth0. You are hanging, correct?
> If you redirected to another vlan ontop of a different physical
> ethernet, and the problem persists then it will be worrisome.
> Actually i am begining to doubt myself. Maybe the vlan device is acting
> strangely. I will try to test your simple setup towards the end of 
> day and see what happens.
> 
> cheers,
> jamal
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
Denys Fedoryshchenko
Technical Manager
Virtual ISP S.A.L.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: one more... iproute commands lockup whole system
  2007-04-04 14:30                         ` jamal
@ 2007-04-04 14:39                           ` Patrick McHardy
  2007-04-05  2:14                             ` jamal
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2007-04-04 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: hadi; +Cc: Denys, Stephen Hemminger, netdev

jamal wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 16:07 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> 
>>How about adding something like ifb's ri_tasklet to act_mirred?
> 
> 
> You mean having a tasklet or the constraint checks?


Have a tasklet to avoid the deadlocks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: HTB/act_mirred problem [was: one more... iproute commands lockup whole system]
  2007-04-04 14:33                       ` jamal
@ 2007-04-04 14:50                         ` Patrick McHardy
  2007-04-05  1:33                           ` jamal
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2007-04-04 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: hadi; +Cc: Denys, Stephen Hemminger, netdev

jamal wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 16:13 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> 
>>This seems to be due to be caused by act_mirred returning TC_ACT_STOLEN,
>>which is translated to NET_XMIT_SUCCESS within prio, causing HTB to
>>increase the q.qlen counter and activating the class despite no packet
>>beeing queued.
>>
>>Jamal, we can't return NET_XMIT_SUCCESS unless we've really queued the
>>packet. I can't remeber the reason why this is done, could you remind
>>me?
> 
> 
> IIRC, It had to do with not confusing TCP to try and retransmit. 


No, that was the default return code which applies to TC_ACT_SHOT
and unclassified packets (29f1df6cc1c3ee3530939f0e38d80a9b50645ba5).
Returning NET_XMIT_SUCCESS for TC_ACT_STOLEN/TC_ACT_QUEUED has always
been done.

Anyway, we can't return NET_XMIT_SUCCESS, so how about just returning
NET_XMIT_BYPASS in all cases where the packet was stolen/dropped/...
by TC actions?

> I can
> go back and look at my notes to be certain. At one point i posted those
> notes, it maybe time to add them to the kernel code or doc somewhere.


In case they're still up to date, adding them somewhere under
Documentation/ sounds good.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: HTB/act_mirred problem [was: one more... iproute commands lockup whole system]
  2007-04-04 14:50                         ` Patrick McHardy
@ 2007-04-05  1:33                           ` jamal
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: jamal @ 2007-04-05  1:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patrick McHardy; +Cc: Denys, Stephen Hemminger, netdev

On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 16:50 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:

> Anyway, we can't return NET_XMIT_SUCCESS, so how about just returning
> NET_XMIT_BYPASS in all cases where the packet was stolen/dropped/...
> by TC actions?

Ok, I think i get you now. Yes, that would work, but:
for the dropped case, you need to record into the dropped stats (unlike
the the other two).

> > I can
> > go back and look at my notes to be certain. At one point i posted those
> > notes, it maybe time to add them to the kernel code or doc somewhere.
> 
> 
> In case they're still up to date, adding them somewhere under
> Documentation/ sounds good.

I think it is still uotodate, if not i will make sure it is before i
submit it.

cheers,
jamal


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

* Re: one more... iproute commands lockup whole system
  2007-04-04 14:39                           ` Patrick McHardy
@ 2007-04-05  2:14                             ` jamal
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: jamal @ 2007-04-05  2:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patrick McHardy; +Cc: Denys, Stephen Hemminger, netdev

On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 16:39 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:

> Have a tasklet to avoid the deadlocks.

sounds like a good idea from the outset. The principle of punishing only
users of mirred is the right one. It will also provide a clean way to
drop all redirect to self.

The dilema is that the cost may end up being in complexity and
performance. Let me throw a few wrenches your way:
- Mirroring doesnt have this problem, only redirecting does. And the
main problem is on egress. So you may have to do the enqueueing only for
those cases, or we may just have to separate redirects from mirroring as
two separate actions. 
- We need to be able to support literally hundreds of such actions, so
if you do a single tasklet per action you will have quiet a few running
- i dont know what the impact is. A solution might be to do a single
tasklet with the mirred table; you will need many queues.
-There may be others like lock contention etc on trying to reinject
which will affect perfomance.
 
I am not against the idea Patrick, I am just worried about performance
and i feel that the majority of people who redirect will, once bitten
(as was Denys), eventually resort to doing the right config and would
rather have good perfomance. 

I could be selfish and wrong by looking at my needs for this action but
i prefer performance and from that perspective i look at this from
someone who didnt read the instructions on a gun and shot at their toe.
You could add a sensor that recognises a toe is being aimed at and pop
up an LCD with a question "are you sure you want to shoot at _a
toe_?" ;-> but that adds to the cost.
I am exagerating - but i hope you get my point.  

cheers,
jamal


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-04-05  2:15 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-03-21 18:00 iproute2-2.6.20-070313 bug ? Denys
2007-03-22 11:23 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-22 12:46   ` Denys
2007-03-22 13:09     ` Patrick McHardy
     [not found]       ` <20070322131245.M85528@visp.net.lb>
2007-03-22 13:23         ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-22 13:35           ` Denys
     [not found]           ` <20070322132637.M88445@visp.net.lb>
2007-03-22 13:43             ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-22 13:47               ` Denys
2007-03-22 13:26       ` Denys
2007-03-22 17:12       ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-22 17:14         ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-26 18:49           ` more... iproute2/htb/whatever critical " Denys
2007-03-27 15:10             ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-27 15:18               ` Denys
2007-03-27 16:00               ` Denys
2007-03-27 16:21                 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-28 17:38                   ` another " Denys
2007-03-28 23:55                   ` Denys
2007-03-29 10:58                     ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-31  2:26         ` more iproute2 issues (not critical) Denys
2007-03-31  2:31           ` Denys
2007-03-31 14:16             ` Patrick McHardy
2007-04-04  0:03         ` one more... iproute commands lockup whole system Denys
2007-04-04  1:10           ` jamal
2007-04-04  1:39             ` Patrick McHardy
2007-04-04  2:09               ` jamal
2007-04-04  2:11               ` Denys
2007-04-04 10:55                 ` jamal
2007-04-04 12:56                   ` Denys
2007-04-04 14:10                     ` jamal
2007-04-04 14:35                       ` Denys
2007-04-04 14:13                     ` HTB/act_mirred problem [was: one more... iproute commands lockup whole system] Patrick McHardy
2007-04-04 14:33                       ` jamal
2007-04-04 14:50                         ` Patrick McHardy
2007-04-05  1:33                           ` jamal
2007-04-04 13:36                   ` one more... iproute commands lockup whole system Patrick McHardy
2007-04-04 13:58                     ` jamal
2007-04-04 14:07                       ` Patrick McHardy
2007-04-04 14:30                         ` jamal
2007-04-04 14:39                           ` Patrick McHardy
2007-04-05  2:14                             ` jamal

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.