All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] x86_64: O_EXCL on /dev/mcelog (resend)
@ 2007-05-07 22:19 Tim Hockin
  2007-05-09 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tim Hockin @ 2007-05-07 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ak, vojtech; +Cc: linux-kernel

From: Tim Hockin <thockin@google.com>

Background:
 /dev/mcelog is a clear-on-read interface.  It is currently possible for
 multiple users to open and read() the device.  Users are protected from
 each other during any one read, but not across reads.

Description:
 This patch adds support for O_EXCL to /dev/mcelog.  If a user opens the
 device with O_EXCL, no other user may open the device (EBUSY).  Likewise,
 any user that tries to open the device with O_EXCL while another user has
 the device will fail (EBUSY).

Result:
 Applications can get exclusive access to /dev/mcelog.  Applications that
 do not care will be unchanged.

Alternatives:
 A simpler choice would be to only allow one open() at all, regardless of
 O_EXCL.

Testing:
 I wrote an application that opens /dev/mcelog with O_EXCL and observed
 that any other app that tried to open /dev/mcelog would fail until the
 exclusive app had closed the device.

Caveats:
 None.

Patch:
 This patch is against 2.6.21.

Signed-off-by: Tim Hockin <thockin@google.com>

---

This is the first version version of this patch.  The simpler alternative
of only one open() sounds better to me, but becomes a net change in
behavior.


diff -pruN linux-2.6.20+th/arch/x86_64/kernel/mce.c linux-2.6.20+th1.5/arch/x86_64/kernel/mce.c
--- linux-2.6.20+th/arch/x86_64/kernel/mce.c	2007-04-27 14:19:08.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.20+th1.5/arch/x86_64/kernel/mce.c	2007-05-01 21:53:10.000000000 -0700
@@ -465,6 +465,40 @@ void __cpuinit mcheck_init(struct cpuinf
  * Character device to read and clear the MCE log.
  */
 
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(mce_state_lock);
+static int open_count;	/* #times opened */
+static int open_exclu;	/* already open exclusive? */
+
+static int mce_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+	spin_lock(&mce_state_lock);
+
+	if (open_exclu || (open_count && (file->f_flags & O_EXCL))) {
+		spin_unlock(&mce_state_lock);
+		return -EBUSY;
+	}
+
+	if (file->f_flags & O_EXCL)
+		open_exclu = 1;
+	open_count++;
+
+	spin_unlock(&mce_state_lock);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int mce_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+	spin_lock(&mce_state_lock);
+
+	open_count--;
+	open_exclu = 0;
+
+	spin_unlock(&mce_state_lock);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static void collect_tscs(void *data) 
 { 
 	unsigned long *cpu_tsc = (unsigned long *)data;
@@ -553,6 +587,8 @@ static int mce_ioctl(struct inode *i, st
 }
 
 static const struct file_operations mce_chrdev_ops = {
+	.open = mce_open,
+	.release = mce_release,
 	.read = mce_read,
 	.ioctl = mce_ioctl,
 };

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86_64: O_EXCL on /dev/mcelog (resend)
  2007-05-07 22:19 [PATCH] x86_64: O_EXCL on /dev/mcelog (resend) Tim Hockin
@ 2007-05-09 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2007-05-09 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tim Hockin; +Cc: ak, vojtech, linux-kernel

On Mon, 7 May 2007 15:19:01 -0700
thockin@google.com (Tim Hockin) wrote:

> From: Tim Hockin <thockin@google.com>
> 
> Background:
>  /dev/mcelog is a clear-on-read interface.  It is currently possible for
>  multiple users to open and read() the device.  Users are protected from
>  each other during any one read, but not across reads.
> 
> Description:
>  This patch adds support for O_EXCL to /dev/mcelog.  If a user opens the
>  device with O_EXCL, no other user may open the device (EBUSY).  Likewise,
>  any user that tries to open the device with O_EXCL while another user has
>  the device will fail (EBUSY).
> 
> Result:
>  Applications can get exclusive access to /dev/mcelog.  Applications that
>  do not care will be unchanged.
> 
> Alternatives:
>  A simpler choice would be to only allow one open() at all, regardless of
>  O_EXCL.
> 
> Testing:
>  I wrote an application that opens /dev/mcelog with O_EXCL and observed
>  that any other app that tried to open /dev/mcelog would fail until the
>  exclusive app had closed the device.
> 
> Caveats:
>  None.
> 
> Patch:
>  This patch is against 2.6.21.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tim Hockin <thockin@google.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> This is the first version version of this patch.  The simpler alternative
> of only one open() sounds better to me, but becomes a net change in
> behavior.
> 
> 
> diff -pruN linux-2.6.20+th/arch/x86_64/kernel/mce.c linux-2.6.20+th1.5/arch/x86_64/kernel/mce.c
> --- linux-2.6.20+th/arch/x86_64/kernel/mce.c	2007-04-27 14:19:08.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.20+th1.5/arch/x86_64/kernel/mce.c	2007-05-01 21:53:10.000000000 -0700
> @@ -465,6 +465,40 @@ void __cpuinit mcheck_init(struct cpuinf
>   * Character device to read and clear the MCE log.
>   */
>  
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(mce_state_lock);
> +static int open_count;	/* #times opened */
> +static int open_exclu;	/* already open exclusive? */

"open_exclusive" ;)

> +static int mce_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> +{
> +	spin_lock(&mce_state_lock);
> +
> +	if (open_exclu || (open_count && (file->f_flags & O_EXCL))) {
> +		spin_unlock(&mce_state_lock);
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (file->f_flags & O_EXCL)
> +		open_exclu = 1;
> +	open_count++;
> +
> +	spin_unlock(&mce_state_lock);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

Does this guy support lseek?  If not we should toss a nonseekable_open()
call in here.

> +static int mce_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> +{
> +	spin_lock(&mce_state_lock);
> +
> +	open_count--;
> +	open_exclu = 0;
> +
> +	spin_unlock(&mce_state_lock);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-05-09 23:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-05-07 22:19 [PATCH] x86_64: O_EXCL on /dev/mcelog (resend) Tim Hockin
2007-05-09 23:45 ` Andrew Morton

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.