[PATCH] tx49xx: add some mach specific headers

[PATCH] tx49xx: add some mach specific headers

[Atsushi Nemoto]

Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
---
 .../asm-mips/mach-tx49xx/cpu-feature-overrides.h   |   23 ++++++++++++++++++++
 include/asm-mips/mach-tx49xx/kmalloc.h             |    8 +++++++
 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/asm-mips/mach-tx49xx/cpu-feature-overrides.h b/include/asm-mips/mach-tx49xx/cpu-feature-overrides.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..275eaf9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/asm-mips/mach-tx49xx/cpu-feature-overrides.h
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+#ifndef __ASM_MACH_TX49XX_CPU_FEATURE_OVERRIDES_H
+#define __ASM_MACH_TX49XX_CPU_FEATURE_OVERRIDES_H
+
+#define cpu_has_llsc	1
+#define cpu_has_64bits	1
+#define cpu_has_inclusive_pcaches	0
+
+#define cpu_has_mips16		0
+#define cpu_has_mdmx		0
+#define cpu_has_mips3d		0
+#define cpu_has_smartmips	0
+#define cpu_has_vtag_icache	0
+#define cpu_has_ic_fills_f_dc	0
+#define cpu_has_dsp	0
+#define cpu_has_mipsmt	0
+#define cpu_has_userlocal	0
+
+#define cpu_has_mips32r1	0
+#define cpu_has_mips32r2	0
+#define cpu_has_mips64r1	0
+#define cpu_has_mips64r2	0
+
+#endif /* __ASM_MACH_TX49XX_CPU_FEATURE_OVERRIDES_H */
diff --git a/include/asm-mips/mach-tx49xx/kmalloc.h b/include/asm-mips/mach-tx49xx/kmalloc.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..913ff19
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/asm-mips/mach-tx49xx/kmalloc.h
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+#ifndef __ASM_MACH_TX49XX_KMALLOC_H
+#define __ASM_MACH_TX49XX_KMALLOC_H
+
+/*
+ * All happy, no need to define ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN
+ */
+
+#endif /* __ASM_MACH_TX49XX_KMALLOC_H */

Re: [PATCH] tx49xx: add some mach specific headers

[Sergei Shtylyov]

Hello.

Atsushi Nemoto wrote:

> diff --git a/include/asm-mips/mach-tx49xx/cpu-feature-overrides.h b/include/asm-mips/mach-tx49xx/cpu-feature-overrides.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..275eaf9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/asm-mips/mach-tx49xx/cpu-feature-overrides.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
[...]
> +#define cpu_has_mips32r1	0
> +#define cpu_has_mips32r2	0
> +#define cpu_has_mips64r1	0
> +#define cpu_has_mips64r2	0

    Hm, really?

> +
> +#endif /* __ASM_MACH_TX49XX_CPU_FEATURE_OVERRIDES_H */

MBR, Sergei

Re: [PATCH] tx49xx: add some mach specific headers

[Thiemo Seufer]

Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/include/asm-mips/mach-tx49xx/cpu-feature-overrides.h 
>> b/include/asm-mips/mach-tx49xx/cpu-feature-overrides.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..275eaf9
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/include/asm-mips/mach-tx49xx/cpu-feature-overrides.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
> [...]
>> +#define cpu_has_mips32r1	0
>> +#define cpu_has_mips32r2	0
>> +#define cpu_has_mips64r1	0
>> +#define cpu_has_mips64r2	0
>
>    Hm, really?

IIRC it is MIPS IV. (tx99 is MIPS64R1).


Thiemo

Re: [PATCH] tx49xx: add some mach specific headers

[Atsushi Nemoto]

On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:20:34 +0100, Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de> wrote:
> >> +#define cpu_has_mips32r1	0
> >> +#define cpu_has_mips32r2	0
> >> +#define cpu_has_mips64r1	0
> >> +#define cpu_has_mips64r2	0
> >
> >    Hm, really?
> 
> IIRC it is MIPS IV. (tx99 is MIPS64R1).

It is MIPS III.

---
Atsushi Nemoto

Re: [PATCH] tx49xx: add some mach specific headers

[Sergei Shtylyov]

Hello.

Atsushi Nemoto wrote:

>>>>+#define cpu_has_mips32r1	0
>>>>+#define cpu_has_mips32r2	0
>>>>+#define cpu_has_mips64r1	0
>>>>+#define cpu_has_mips64r2	0

>>>   Hm, really?

    I'm not good at arch generations, so forgive me a silly complaint. ;-)

>>IIRC it is MIPS IV. (tx99 is MIPS64R1).

> It is MIPS III.

    "Upward compatible" with it as the manual says.

> ---
> Atsushi Nemoto

WBR, Sergei

Re: [PATCH] tx49xx: add some mach specific headers

[Ralf Baechle]

On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 01:50:08AM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote:

Applied.  Thanks,

  Ralf

Re: [PATCH] tx49xx: add some mach specific headers

[Atsushi Nemoto]

On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:03:19 +0400, Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> wrote:
> > It is MIPS III.
> 
>     "Upward compatible" with it as the manual says.

Oh Yes.  Exactly.

---
Atsushi Nemoto