All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Raid 1, can't get the second disk added back in.
@ 2008-01-05 16:05 Jim
  2008-01-05 20:00 ` Nagilum
  2008-01-06 22:34 ` Neil Brown
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jim @ 2008-01-05 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-raid

Sometime in the distant past, I lost a member of my raid 1 group.  
Here's some output:

root@chinaberry:~# mdadm /dev/md0 --add /dev/hdb5
mdadm: Cannot open /dev/hdb5: Device or resource busy
root@chinaberry:~# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1]
md0 : active raid1 hda5[1]
      93771264 blocks [2/1] [_U]

unused devices: <none>
root@chinaberry:~# cat /etc/mdadm.conf
DEVICE /dev/hdb5 /dev/hda5
ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid1 num-devices=2

root@chinaberry:~# fdisk -l /dev/hdb

Disk /dev/hdb: 120.0 GB, 120034123776 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 14593 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hdb1               1         973     7815591   83  Linux
/dev/hdb2             974        1946     7815622+  83  Linux
/dev/hdb3            1947        2919     7815622+  83  Linux
/dev/hdb4            2920       14593    93771405    5  Extended
/dev/hdb5            2920       14593    93771373+  83  Linux
root@chinaberry:~# fdisk -l /dev/hda

Disk /dev/hda: 120.0 GB, 120034123776 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 14593 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hda1   *           1         973     7815591   83  Linux
/dev/hda2             974        1946     7815622+  83  Linux
/dev/hda3            1947        2919     7815622+  83  Linux
/dev/hda4            2920       14593    93771405    5  Extended
/dev/hda5            2920       14593    93771373+  83  Linux

I attempted to boot single user mode and fsck /dev/hdb5 but single user 
doesn't seem to do what it used to, for some reason /dev/md0 was 
mounted.  However I did boot Knoppix CD and do a fsck -f /dev/hdb5.  It 
had no errors and when I rebooted back it still wouldn't install.

I've searched the documentation and pretty much anything I try ends up 
with a "Cannot open /dev/hdb5: Device or resource busy" message.

Here's what mount says:
/dev/sda3 on / type ext3 (rw,errors=remount-ro)
proc on /proc type proc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev)
/sys on /sys type sysfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev)
varrun on /var/run type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,mode=0755)
varlock on /var/lock type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,mode=1777)
procbususb on /proc/bus/usb type usbfs (rw)
udev on /dev type tmpfs (rw,mode=0755)
devshm on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw)
devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620)
/dev/sda5 on /home type ext3 (rw)
/dev/md0 on /backupmirror type ext3 (rw)
/dev/hda1 on /vz type ext3 (rw)
binfmt_misc on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc type binfmt_misc (rw)

from dmesg:
md: md0 stopped.
md: bind<hdb5>
md: bind<hda5>
md: kicking non-fresh hdb5 from array!
md: unbind<hdb5>
md: export_rdev(hdb5)
raid1: raid set md0 active with 1 out of 2 mirrors

And :
mdadm --detail /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
        Version : 00.90.03
  Creation Time : Fri Feb 23 15:03:40 2007
     Raid Level : raid1
     Array Size : 93771264 (89.43 GiB 96.02 GB)
    Device Size : 93771264 (89.43 GiB 96.02 GB)
   Raid Devices : 2
  Total Devices : 1
Preferred Minor : 0
    Persistence : Superblock is persistent

    Update Time : Sat Jan  5 10:45:47 2008
          State : clean, degraded
 Active Devices : 1
Working Devices : 1
 Failed Devices : 0
  Spare Devices : 0

           UUID : d01d66b4:16efa6c2:d7493088:59f3fe68
         Events : 0.28752

    Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
       0       0        0        0      removed
       1       3        5        1      active sync   /dev/hda5

root@chinaberry:~# mdadm /dev/md0 --fail /dev/hdb5 --remove /dev/hdb5
mdadm: set device faulty failed for /dev/hdb5:  No such device
root@chinaberry:~# mdadm /dev/md0 --fail /dev/hdb5
mdadm: set device faulty failed for /dev/hdb5:  No such device

root@chinaberry:~# mdadm /dev/md0 --remove /dev/hdb5
mdadm: hot remove failed for /dev/hdb5: No such device or address
root@chinaberry:~# mdadm /dev/md0 --add /dev/hdb5
mdadm: Cannot open /dev/hdb5: Device or resource busy

All the solutions I've been able to google fail with the busy.  There is 
nothing that I can find that might be  using /dev/hdb5 except the raid 
device and it appears it's not either.

I'd be happy getting /dev/hdb5 back as a separate device and give up on 
raid entirely if that will solve this problem but I can't figure out how 
to get the raid drive to let loose of either partition.

Thanks for any guidance.  It worked for about 6 months then one day it 
went Poof!  I'm sure it was during a power failure.

Jim.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: Raid 1, can't get the second disk added back in.
  2008-01-05 16:05 Raid 1, can't get the second disk added back in Jim
@ 2008-01-05 20:00 ` Nagilum
  2008-01-06 11:13   ` Jim
  2008-01-06 22:28   ` Neil Brown
  2008-01-06 22:34 ` Neil Brown
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Nagilum @ 2008-01-05 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jim; +Cc: linux-raid

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4879 bytes --]

----- Message from jim@fayettedigital.com ---------
     Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 11:05:00 -0500
     From: Jim <jim@fayettedigital.com>
Reply-To: jim@fayettedigital.com
  Subject: Raid 1, can't get the second disk added back in.
       To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org


> Sometime in the distant past, I lost a member of my raid 1 group.
> Here's some output:
>
> root@chinaberry:~# mdadm /dev/md0 --add /dev/hdb5
> mdadm: Cannot open /dev/hdb5: Device or resource busy
> root@chinaberry:~# cat /proc/mdstat
> Personalities : [raid1]
> md0 : active raid1 hda5[1]
>      93771264 blocks [2/1] [_U]
>
> unused devices: <none>
> root@chinaberry:~# cat /etc/mdadm.conf
> DEVICE /dev/hdb5 /dev/hda5
> ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid1 num-devices=2
>
> root@chinaberry:~# fdisk -l /dev/hdb
>
> Disk /dev/hdb: 120.0 GB, 120034123776 bytes
> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 14593 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
>
>   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
> /dev/hdb1               1         973     7815591   83  Linux
> /dev/hdb2             974        1946     7815622+  83  Linux
> /dev/hdb3            1947        2919     7815622+  83  Linux
> /dev/hdb4            2920       14593    93771405    5  Extended
> /dev/hdb5            2920       14593    93771373+  83  Linux
> root@chinaberry:~# fdisk -l /dev/hda
>
> Disk /dev/hda: 120.0 GB, 120034123776 bytes
> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 14593 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
>
>   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
> /dev/hda1   *           1         973     7815591   83  Linux
> /dev/hda2             974        1946     7815622+  83  Linux
> /dev/hda3            1947        2919     7815622+  83  Linux
> /dev/hda4            2920       14593    93771405    5  Extended
> /dev/hda5            2920       14593    93771373+  83  Linux
>
> I attempted to boot single user mode and fsck /dev/hdb5 but single user
> doesn't seem to do what it used to, for some reason /dev/md0 was
> mounted.  However I did boot Knoppix CD and do a fsck -f /dev/hdb5.  It
> had no errors and when I rebooted back it still wouldn't install.
>
> I've searched the documentation and pretty much anything I try ends up
> with a "Cannot open /dev/hdb5: Device or resource busy" message.
>
> Here's what mount says:
> /dev/sda3 on / type ext3 (rw,errors=remount-ro)
> proc on /proc type proc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev)
> /sys on /sys type sysfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev)
> varrun on /var/run type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,mode=0755)
> varlock on /var/lock type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,mode=1777)
> procbususb on /proc/bus/usb type usbfs (rw)
> udev on /dev type tmpfs (rw,mode=0755)
> devshm on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw)
> devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620)
> /dev/sda5 on /home type ext3 (rw)
> /dev/md0 on /backupmirror type ext3 (rw)
> /dev/hda1 on /vz type ext3 (rw)
> binfmt_misc on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc type binfmt_misc (rw)
>
> from dmesg:
> md: md0 stopped.
> md: bind<hdb5>
> md: bind<hda5>
> md: kicking non-fresh hdb5 from array!
> md: unbind<hdb5>
> md: export_rdev(hdb5)
> raid1: raid set md0 active with 1 out of 2 mirrors
>
> And :
> mdadm --detail /dev/md0
> /dev/md0:
>        Version : 00.90.03
>  Creation Time : Fri Feb 23 15:03:40 2007
>     Raid Level : raid1
>     Array Size : 93771264 (89.43 GiB 96.02 GB)
>    Device Size : 93771264 (89.43 GiB 96.02 GB)
>   Raid Devices : 2
>  Total Devices : 1
> Preferred Minor : 0
>    Persistence : Superblock is persistent
>
>    Update Time : Sat Jan  5 10:45:47 2008
>          State : clean, degraded
> Active Devices : 1
> Working Devices : 1
> Failed Devices : 0
>  Spare Devices : 0
>
>           UUID : d01d66b4:16efa6c2:d7493088:59f3fe68
>         Events : 0.28752
>
>    Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
>       0       0        0        0      removed
>       1       3        5        1      active sync   /dev/hda5
>
----- End message from jim@fayettedigital.com -----

Since /dev/hdb5 has been part of this array before you should use  
--re-add instead of --add.
Kind regards,
Alex.

========================================================================
#    _  __          _ __     http://www.nagilum.org/ \n icq://69646724 #
#   / |/ /__ ____ _(_) /_ ____ _  nagilum@nagilum.org \n +491776461165 #
#  /    / _ `/ _ `/ / / // /  ' \  Amiga (68k/PPC): AOS/NetBSD/Linux   #
# /_/|_/\_,_/\_, /_/_/\_,_/_/_/_/   Mac (PPC): MacOS-X / NetBSD /Linux #
#           /___/     x86: FreeBSD/Linux/Solaris/Win2k  ARM9: EPOC EV6 #
========================================================================


----------------------------------------------------------------
cakebox.homeunix.net - all the machine one needs..


[-- Attachment #2: PGP Digital Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 187 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: Raid 1, can't get the second disk added back in.
  2008-01-05 20:00 ` Nagilum
@ 2008-01-06 11:13   ` Jim
  2008-01-06 16:31     ` Nagilum
  2008-01-06 22:28   ` Neil Brown
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jim @ 2008-01-06 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-raid

Nagilum wrote:
>
>
> Since /dev/hdb5 has been part of this array before you should use 
> --re-add instead of --add.
> Kind regards,
> Alex.
>
OK

root@chinaberry:~# mdadm  /dev/md0 --re-add /dev/hdb5
mdadm: Cannot open /dev/hdb5: Device or resource busy

Jim

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: Raid 1, can't get the second disk added back in.
  2008-01-06 11:13   ` Jim
@ 2008-01-06 16:31     ` Nagilum
  2008-01-06 16:49       ` Jim
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Nagilum @ 2008-01-06 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jim; +Cc: linux-raid

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 956 bytes --]

----- Message from jim@fayettedigital.com ---------
     Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 06:13:06 -0500
     From: Jim <jim@fayettedigital.com>

> root@chinaberry:~# mdadm  /dev/md0 --re-add /dev/hdb5
> mdadm: Cannot open /dev/hdb5: Device or resource busy

Have you tried stopping (-S) /dev/md0 and then re-assemble the array (-A)?


========================================================================
#    _  __          _ __     http://www.nagilum.org/ \n icq://69646724 #
#   / |/ /__ ____ _(_) /_ ____ _  nagilum@nagilum.org \n +491776461165 #
#  /    / _ `/ _ `/ / / // /  ' \  Amiga (68k/PPC): AOS/NetBSD/Linux   #
# /_/|_/\_,_/\_, /_/_/\_,_/_/_/_/   Mac (PPC): MacOS-X / NetBSD /Linux #
#           /___/     x86: FreeBSD/Linux/Solaris/Win2k  ARM9: EPOC EV6 #
========================================================================


----------------------------------------------------------------
cakebox.homeunix.net - all the machine one needs..


[-- Attachment #2: PGP Digital Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 187 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: Raid 1, can't get the second disk added back in.
  2008-01-06 16:31     ` Nagilum
@ 2008-01-06 16:49       ` Jim
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jim @ 2008-01-06 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nagilum; +Cc: linux-raid

Nagilum wrote:
> ----- Message from jim@fayettedigital.com ---------
>     Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 06:13:06 -0500
>     From: Jim <jim@fayettedigital.com>
>
>> root@chinaberry:~# mdadm  /dev/md0 --re-add /dev/hdb5
>> mdadm: Cannot open /dev/hdb5: Device or resource busy
>
> Have you tried stopping (-S) /dev/md0 and then re-assemble the array 
> (-A)?
Yes, I did that yesterday.  Something is holding on to /dev/hdb5, 'cause 
I got the device busy message from that attempt too.  I think I'm going 
to remove the partition and see what happens.

Thanks,
Jim.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: Raid 1, can't get the second disk added back in.
  2008-01-05 20:00 ` Nagilum
  2008-01-06 11:13   ` Jim
@ 2008-01-06 22:28   ` Neil Brown
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Neil Brown @ 2008-01-06 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nagilum; +Cc: jim, linux-raid

On Saturday January 5, nagilum@nagilum.org wrote:
> 
> Since /dev/hdb5 has been part of this array before you should use  
> --re-add instead of --add.
> Kind regards,
> Alex.

That is not correct.

--re-add is only needed for arrays without metadata, for which you use
"--build" to start them.

NeilBrown

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: Raid 1, can't get the second disk added back in.
  2008-01-05 16:05 Raid 1, can't get the second disk added back in Jim
  2008-01-05 20:00 ` Nagilum
@ 2008-01-06 22:34 ` Neil Brown
  2008-01-07 14:26   ` Jim
  2008-01-07 14:46   ` Jim
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Neil Brown @ 2008-01-06 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jim; +Cc: linux-raid

On Saturday January 5, jim@fayettedigital.com wrote:
> root@chinaberry:~# mdadm /dev/md0 --add /dev/hdb5
> mdadm: Cannot open /dev/hdb5: Device or resource busy
> 
> All the solutions I've been able to google fail with the busy.  There is 
> nothing that I can find that might be  using /dev/hdb5 except the raid 
> device and it appears it's not either.

Very odd. But something must be using it.

What does
   ls -l /sys/block/hdb/hdb5/holders
show?
What about
   cat /proc/mounts
   cat /proc/swaps
   lsof /dev/hdb5
  
??
NeilBrown

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: Raid 1, can't get the second disk added back in.
  2008-01-06 22:34 ` Neil Brown
@ 2008-01-07 14:26   ` Jim
  2008-01-07 14:46   ` Jim
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jim @ 2008-01-07 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-raid

Neil Brown wrote:
> On Saturday January 5, jim@fayettedigital.com wrote:
>   
>> root@chinaberry:~# mdadm /dev/md0 --add /dev/hdb5
>> mdadm: Cannot open /dev/hdb5: Device or resource busy
>>
>> All the solutions I've been able to google fail with the busy.  There is 
>> nothing that I can find that might be  using /dev/hdb5 except the raid 
>> device and it appears it's not either.
>>     
>
> Very odd. But something must be using it.
>
> What does
>    ls -l /sys/block/hdb/hdb5/holders
> show?
> What about
>    cat /proc/mounts
>    cat /proc/swaps
>    lsof /dev/hdb5
>   
> ??
> NeilBrown
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>   
I agree but for the life of me I can't figure out what, other than some 
raid daemon.

root@chinaberry:~# ls -l /sys/block/hdb/hdb5/holders
total 0
root@chinaberry:~# cat /proc/mounts
none /sys sysfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec 0 0
none /proc proc rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec 0 0
udev /dev tmpfs rw 0 0
/dev/disk/by-uuid/4f67dae8-cdcb-460e-86cd-a5f0e4009422 / ext3 
rw,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/disk/by-uuid/4f67dae8-cdcb-460e-86cd-a5f0e4009422 /dev/.static/dev 
ext3 rw,data=ordered 0 0
tmpfs /var/run tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec 0 0
tmpfs /var/lock tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec 0 0
tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs rw 0 0
devpts /dev/pts devpts rw 0 0
usbfs /dev/bus/usb/.usbfs usbfs rw 0 0
udev /proc/bus/usb tmpfs rw 0 0
usbfs /proc/bus/usb/.usbfs usbfs rw 0 0
tmpfs /var/run tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec 0 0
tmpfs /var/lock tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec 0 0
/dev/sda5 /home ext3 rw,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/md0 /backupmirror ext3 rw,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/hda1 /vz ext3 rw,data=ordered 0 0
/vz/private/225 /vz/root/225 simfs rw 0 0
/vz/private/300 /vz/root/300 simfs rw 0 0
/proc /vz/root/225/proc proc rw 0 0
/sys /vz/root/225/sys sysfs rw 0 0
none /vz/root/225/dev/pts devpts rw 0 0
/proc /vz/root/300/proc proc rw 0 0
/sys /vz/root/300/sys sysfs rw 0 0
none /vz/root/300/dev/pts devpts rw 0 0
binfmt_misc /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc binfmt_misc rw 0 0
root@chinaberry:~# cat /proc/mounts | grep hdb
root@chinaberry:~# cat /proc/swaps
root@chinaberry:~# lsof /dev/hdb5


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: Raid 1, can't get the second disk added back in.
  2008-01-06 22:34 ` Neil Brown
  2008-01-07 14:26   ` Jim
@ 2008-01-07 14:46   ` Jim
  2008-01-07 22:47     ` Neil Brown
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jim @ 2008-01-07 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-raid

Neil Brown wrote:
> On Saturday January 5, jim@fayettedigital.com wrote:
>   
>> root@chinaberry:~# mdadm /dev/md0 --add /dev/hdb5
>> mdadm: Cannot open /dev/hdb5: Device or resource busy
>>
>> All the solutions I've been able to google fail with the busy.  There is 
>> nothing that I can find that might be  using /dev/hdb5 except the raid 
>> device and it appears it's not either.
>>     
>
> Very odd. But something must be using it.
>
> What does
>    ls -l /sys/block/hdb/hdb5/holders
> show?
> What about
>    cat /proc/mounts
>    cat /proc/swaps
>    lsof /dev/hdb5
>   
> ??
> NeilBrown
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>   
Problem is not raid, or at least not obviously raid related.  The 
problem is that the whole disk, /dev/hdb is unavailable. 

root@chinaberry:~# for i in /dev/hdb?
 > do
 > mount $i /mnt
 > done
mount: /dev/hdb1 already mounted or /mnt busy
mount: /dev/hdb2 already mounted or /mnt busy
mount: /dev/hdb3 already mounted or /mnt busy
mount: /dev/hdb4 already mounted or /mnt busy
mount: /dev/hdb5 already mounted or /mnt busy
mount: /dev/hdb6 already mounted or /mnt busy
root@chinaberry:~# mount /dev/hda1 /mnt

I can fdisk it but none of the partitons are available. Knoppix can 
access it normally so it's not a hardware issue.  No funny messages in 
the syslog. So I'll go off and stop harassing this list.  ;)

Thanks,
Jim.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: Raid 1, can't get the second disk added back in.
  2008-01-07 14:46   ` Jim
@ 2008-01-07 22:47     ` Neil Brown
  2008-01-08 21:02       ` Bill Davidsen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Neil Brown @ 2008-01-07 22:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jim; +Cc: linux-raid

On Monday January 7, jim@fayettedigital.com wrote:
> Problem is not raid, or at least not obviously raid related.  The 
> problem is that the whole disk, /dev/hdb is unavailable. 

Maybe check /sys/block/hdb/holders ?  lsof /dev/hdb ?

good luck :-)

NeilBrown

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: Raid 1, can't get the second disk added back in.
  2008-01-07 22:47     ` Neil Brown
@ 2008-01-08 21:02       ` Bill Davidsen
  2008-01-10  6:25         ` dean gaudet
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Bill Davidsen @ 2008-01-08 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Neil Brown; +Cc: jim, linux-raid

Neil Brown wrote:
> On Monday January 7, jim@fayettedigital.com wrote:
>   
>> Problem is not raid, or at least not obviously raid related.  The 
>> problem is that the whole disk, /dev/hdb is unavailable. 
>>     
>
> Maybe check /sys/block/hdb/holders ?  lsof /dev/hdb ?
>
> good luck :-)
>
>   
losetup -a may help, lsof doesn't seem to show files used in loop 
mounts. Yes, long shot...

-- 
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
  "Woe unto the statesman who makes war without a reason that will still
  be valid when the war is over..." Otto von Bismark 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: Raid 1, can't get the second disk added back in.
  2008-01-08 21:02       ` Bill Davidsen
@ 2008-01-10  6:25         ` dean gaudet
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dean gaudet @ 2008-01-10  6:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bill Davidsen; +Cc: Neil Brown, jim, linux-raid

On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Bill Davidsen wrote:

> Neil Brown wrote:
> > On Monday January 7, jim@fayettedigital.com wrote:
> >   
> > > Problem is not raid, or at least not obviously raid related.  The problem
> > > is that the whole disk, /dev/hdb is unavailable.     
> > 
> > Maybe check /sys/block/hdb/holders ?  lsof /dev/hdb ?
> > 
> > good luck :-)
> > 
> >   
> losetup -a may help, lsof doesn't seem to show files used in loop mounts. Yes,
> long shot...

and don't forget "dmsetup ls"... (followed immediately by "apt-get remove 
evms" if you're on an unfortunate version of ubuntu which helpfully 
installed that partition-stealing service for you.)

-dean

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-01-10  6:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-01-05 16:05 Raid 1, can't get the second disk added back in Jim
2008-01-05 20:00 ` Nagilum
2008-01-06 11:13   ` Jim
2008-01-06 16:31     ` Nagilum
2008-01-06 16:49       ` Jim
2008-01-06 22:28   ` Neil Brown
2008-01-06 22:34 ` Neil Brown
2008-01-07 14:26   ` Jim
2008-01-07 14:46   ` Jim
2008-01-07 22:47     ` Neil Brown
2008-01-08 21:02       ` Bill Davidsen
2008-01-10  6:25         ` dean gaudet

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.