All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Eric Whitney <eric.whitney@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 2.6.24][regression fix] Mempolicy: silently restrict nodemask to allowed nodes V3
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:18:57 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080212220916.B1EC.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080211210724.eec5421d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

Hi

> > please ack.
> 
> As it's now post -rc1 and not a 100% obvious thing, I tend to hang onto
> such patches for a week or so before sending up to Linus

Thanks, really thanks.


> Should this be backported to 2.6.24.x?  If so, the reasons for such a
> relatively stern step should be spelled out in the changelog for the
> -stable maintiners to evaluate.

Oh,
you think below reason is not enough, really?

1. it is regression.
2. it is very easy reprodusable on memoryless node machine.


if so, i back down on my backport reclaim.
I don't hope increase your headache ;-)

thanks.

-kosaki



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Eric Whitney <eric.whitney@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 2.6.24][regression fix] Mempolicy: silently restrict nodemask to allowed nodes V3
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:18:57 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080212220916.B1EC.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080211210724.eec5421d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

Hi

> > please ack.
> 
> As it's now post -rc1 and not a 100% obvious thing, I tend to hang onto
> such patches for a week or so before sending up to Linus

Thanks, really thanks.


> Should this be backported to 2.6.24.x?  If so, the reasons for such a
> relatively stern step should be spelled out in the changelog for the
> -stable maintiners to evaluate.

Oh,
you think below reason is not enough, really?

1. it is regression.
2. it is very easy reprodusable on memoryless node machine.


if so, i back down on my backport reclaim.
I don't hope increase your headache ;-)

thanks.

-kosaki


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-12 13:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-02  8:12 [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all doesn't works on memoryless node KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-02  8:12 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-02  9:09 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-02  9:09   ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-02  9:37   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-02  9:37     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-02 11:30     ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-02 11:30       ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-04 19:03       ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-04 19:03         ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-04 18:20     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-04 18:20       ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05  9:26       ` [2.6.24 regression][BUGFIX] " KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-05  9:26         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-05 21:57         ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 22:12           ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-06 16:00             ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 22:15           ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-06  2:17           ` David Rientjes
2008-02-06 16:11             ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-06  6:49           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-06 17:38         ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-07  8:31           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-08 19:45         ` [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1] Mempolicy: silently restrict nodemask to allowed nodes V3 Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-08 19:45           ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-09 18:11           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-09 18:11             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-10  5:29           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-10  5:29             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-10  5:49             ` Greg KH
2008-02-10  5:49               ` Greg KH
2008-02-10  7:42               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-10  7:42                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-10 10:31                 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-10 10:31                   ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-11 16:47                 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-11 16:47                   ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-12  0:43                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-12  1:00                     ` David Rientjes
2008-02-12  1:56                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-12  2:05                         ` David Rientjes
2008-02-12  3:05                           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-12  3:17                             ` David Rientjes
2008-02-12 15:08                       ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-12 19:06                         ` David Rientjes
2008-02-13  0:07                           ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-13  0:42                             ` David Rientjes
2008-02-13 16:32                               ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-13 18:32                                 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-13 18:56                                   ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-12  4:30                   ` [PATCH for 2.6.24][regression fix] " KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-12  4:30                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-12  5:06                     ` David Rientjes
2008-02-12  5:06                       ` David Rientjes
2008-02-12  5:07                     ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-12  5:07                       ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-12 13:18                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2008-02-12 13:18                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-05 10:17       ` [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all doesn't works on memoryless node Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 10:17         ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 11:14         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-05 11:14           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-05 19:56         ` David Rientjes
2008-02-05 19:56           ` David Rientjes
2008-02-05 20:51           ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 20:51             ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 21:03             ` David Rientjes
2008-02-05 21:03               ` David Rientjes
2008-02-05 21:33               ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 21:33                 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 22:04                 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 22:04                   ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 22:44                   ` David Rientjes
2008-02-05 22:44                     ` David Rientjes
2008-02-05 22:50                   ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 22:50                     ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 14:31       ` Mel Gorman
2008-02-05 14:31         ` Mel Gorman
2008-02-05 15:23         ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 15:23           ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 18:12           ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-05 18:12             ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-05 18:27             ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 18:27               ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 19:04               ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-05 19:04                 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-05 19:15                 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 19:15                   ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 20:06                   ` David Rientjes
2008-02-05 20:06                     ` David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080212220916.B1EC.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.