FC Transport layer in xen

FC Transport layer in xen

[Tej]

Hi All

As i was referring to the following link
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2007-06/msg00996.html

but i can't see this work in official xen 3.2.
Is it still in review?

Or can i use the same patches to perform some NPIV task.


thanks in advance for any help

-TEJ

Re: FC Transport layer in xen

[Mark Williamson]

On Wednesday 20 August 2008, Tej wrote:
> Hi All
>
> As i was referring to the following link
> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2007-06/msg00996.html
>
> but i can't see this work in official xen 3.2.
> Is it still in review?

I think I've seen activing reviewing of this patch set fairly recently so 
presumably it's still being worked on.  It doesn't look like it's made it 
into 3.3, so I guess 3.4 would be the soonest we'd expect it...

> Or can i use the same patches to perform some NPIV task.

If you're willing to try experimental software you could probably patch the 
code yourself - you might need to be prepared to do some merging in places if 
the Xen tree has diverged from the state that the patches expect...

You should try to make sure you have the most recent patches possible - I'm 
sure they've been updated several times since the mailing list post that you 
found.

Cheers,
Mark

>
>
> thanks in advance for any help
>
> -TEJ



-- 
Push Me Pull You - Distributed SCM tool (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~maw48/pmpu/)

Re: FC Transport layer in xen

[Tej]

On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:16 AM, Mark Williamson
<mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 August 2008, Tej wrote:
>> Hi All
>>
>> As i was referring to the following link
>> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2007-06/msg00996.html
>>
>> but i can't see this work in official xen 3.2.
>> Is it still in review?
>
> I think I've seen activing reviewing of this patch set fairly recently so
> presumably it's still being worked on.  It doesn't look like it's made it
> into 3.3, so I guess 3.4 would be the soonest we'd expect it...
>
>> Or can i use the same patches to perform some NPIV task.
>
> If you're willing to try experimental software you could probably patch the
> code yourself - you might need to be prepared to do some merging in places if
> the Xen tree has diverged from the state that the patches expect...
>
> You should try to make sure you have the most recent patches possible - I'm
> sure they've been updated several times since the mailing list post that you
> found.

thanks, i will go ahead with the solution.

>
> Cheers,
> Mark
>
>>
>>
>> thanks in advance for any help
>>
>> -TEJ
>
>
>
> --
> Push Me Pull You - Distributed SCM tool (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~maw48/pmpu/)
>

Re: FC Transport layer in xen

[Mark Williamson]

Actually, the PVSCSI *was* mentioned in the 3.3 release announcement so I 
think you should find it there...

The header file seems not to have made its way into xen/include/public/io/ 
along with the other front/back interface definitions.  It is in the XenLinux 
copy of that directory, though, which I hadn't checked.

3.3 is probably worth looking at, then ;-)

Cheers,
Mark

On Saturday 23 August 2008, Tej wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:16 AM, Mark Williamson
>
> <mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 20 August 2008, Tej wrote:
> >> Hi All
> >>
> >> As i was referring to the following link
> >> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2007-06/msg00996.html
> >>
> >> but i can't see this work in official xen 3.2.
> >> Is it still in review?
> >
> > I think I've seen activing reviewing of this patch set fairly recently so
> > presumably it's still being worked on.  It doesn't look like it's made it
> > into 3.3, so I guess 3.4 would be the soonest we'd expect it...
> >
> >> Or can i use the same patches to perform some NPIV task.
> >
> > If you're willing to try experimental software you could probably patch
> > the code yourself - you might need to be prepared to do some merging in
> > places if the Xen tree has diverged from the state that the patches
> > expect...
> >
> > You should try to make sure you have the most recent patches possible -
> > I'm sure they've been updated several times since the mailing list post
> > that you found.
>
> thanks, i will go ahead with the solution.
>
> > Cheers,
> > Mark
> >
> >> thanks in advance for any help
> >>
> >> -TEJ
> >
> > --
> > Push Me Pull You - Distributed SCM tool
> > (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~maw48/pmpu/)



-- 
Push Me Pull You - Distributed SCM tool (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~maw48/pmpu/)

Re: FC Transport layer in xen

[Tej]

On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 6:53 AM, Mark Williamson
<mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> Actually, the PVSCSI *was* mentioned in the 3.3 release announcement so I
> think you should find it there...

yaa i was looking at 3.3 release notes, but i couldn't relate PVSCSCI to it
thanks for this pointers

>
> The header file seems not to have made its way into xen/include/public/io/
> along with the other front/back interface definitions.  It is in the XenLinux
> copy of that directory, though, which I hadn't checked.
>
> 3.3 is probably worth looking at, then ;-)
>
> Cheers,
> Mark
>
> On Saturday 23 August 2008, Tej wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:16 AM, Mark Williamson
>>
>> <mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 20 August 2008, Tej wrote:
>> >> Hi All
>> >>
>> >> As i was referring to the following link
>> >> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2007-06/msg00996.html
>> >>
>> >> but i can't see this work in official xen 3.2.
>> >> Is it still in review?
>> >
>> > I think I've seen activing reviewing of this patch set fairly recently so
>> > presumably it's still being worked on.  It doesn't look like it's made it
>> > into 3.3, so I guess 3.4 would be the soonest we'd expect it...
>> >
>> >> Or can i use the same patches to perform some NPIV task.
>> >
>> > If you're willing to try experimental software you could probably patch
>> > the code yourself - you might need to be prepared to do some merging in
>> > places if the Xen tree has diverged from the state that the patches
>> > expect...
>> >
>> > You should try to make sure you have the most recent patches possible -
>> > I'm sure they've been updated several times since the mailing list post
>> > that you found.
>>
>> thanks, i will go ahead with the solution.
>>
>> > Cheers,
>> > Mark
>> >
>> >> thanks in advance for any help
>> >>
>> >> -TEJ
>> >
>> > --
>> > Push Me Pull You - Distributed SCM tool
>> > (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~maw48/pmpu/)
>
>
>
> --
> Push Me Pull You - Distributed SCM tool (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~maw48/pmpu/)
>

Re: Re: FC Transport layer in xen

[Jun Kamada]

Hi Tej-san Mark-san and all,

Unfortunately, the pvSCSI driver for Xen 3.3 does not support FC
transport layer functionality. I consider that at least new export 
mode, which exports whole physical SCSI tree under a HBA to guest 
domain, is needed. (FC transport functionality assumes physical 
topology, I think.)

Best regards,


On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:07:25 +0530
Tej <bewith.tej@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 6:53 AM, Mark Williamson
> <mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> > Actually, the PVSCSI *was* mentioned in the 3.3 release announcement so I
> > think you should find it there...
> 
> yaa i was looking at 3.3 release notes, but i couldn't relate PVSCSCI to it
> thanks for this pointers
> 
> >
> > The header file seems not to have made its way into xen/include/public/io/
> > along with the other front/back interface definitions.  It is in the XenLinux
> > copy of that directory, though, which I hadn't checked.
> >
> > 3.3 is probably worth looking at, then ;-)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Mark
> >
> > On Saturday 23 August 2008, Tej wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:16 AM, Mark Williamson
> >>
> >> <mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> >> > On Wednesday 20 August 2008, Tej wrote:
> >> >> Hi All
> >> >>
> >> >> As i was referring to the following link
> >> >> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2007-06/msg00996.html
> >> >>
> >> >> but i can't see this work in official xen 3.2.
> >> >> Is it still in review?
> >> >
> >> > I think I've seen activing reviewing of this patch set fairly recently so
> >> > presumably it's still being worked on.  It doesn't look like it's made it
> >> > into 3.3, so I guess 3.4 would be the soonest we'd expect it...
> >> >
> >> >> Or can i use the same patches to perform some NPIV task.
> >> >
> >> > If you're willing to try experimental software you could probably patch
> >> > the code yourself - you might need to be prepared to do some merging in
> >> > places if the Xen tree has diverged from the state that the patches
> >> > expect...
> >> >
> >> > You should try to make sure you have the most recent patches possible -
> >> > I'm sure they've been updated several times since the mailing list post
> >> > that you found.
> >>
> >> thanks, i will go ahead with the solution.
> >>
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Mark
> >> >
> >> >> thanks in advance for any help
> >> >>
> >> >> -TEJ
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Push Me Pull You - Distributed SCM tool
> >> > (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~maw48/pmpu/)
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Push Me Pull You - Distributed SCM tool (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~maw48/pmpu/)
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


-----
Jun Kamada

Re: Re: FC Transport layer in xen

[Tej]

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Jun Kamada <kama@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Hi Tej-san Mark-san and all,
>
> Unfortunately, the pvSCSI driver for Xen 3.3 does not support FC
> transport layer functionality. I consider that at least new export
> mode, which exports whole physical SCSI tree under a HBA to guest
> domain, is needed. (FC transport functionality assumes physical
> topology, I think.)
Actually i am still at compilation and building stage of xen 3.3 and
will get back  on this.
Currently we are using the patches indicated in my previous post. i
could get the following.
1. I am able to access and see all the disk on SAN in dom0 i.e. cat
/proc/scsi/scsi list all the disk.
2. domU could not able to see that FC HBA driver itself, i will try
with directly assigning the PCI device to domU (HTH)
Front-back arch. could not be the culprit because this arch. is
applicable to dom0 also.

so what i am missing?

thanks
-tej
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:07:25 +0530
> Tej <bewith.tej@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 6:53 AM, Mark Williamson
>> <mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>> > Actually, the PVSCSI *was* mentioned in the 3.3 release announcement so I
>> > think you should find it there...
>>
>> yaa i was looking at 3.3 release notes, but i couldn't relate PVSCSCI to it
>> thanks for this pointers
>>
>> >
>> > The header file seems not to have made its way into xen/include/public/io/
>> > along with the other front/back interface definitions.  It is in the XenLinux
>> > copy of that directory, though, which I hadn't checked.
>> >
>> > 3.3 is probably worth looking at, then ;-)
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Mark
>> >
>> > On Saturday 23 August 2008, Tej wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:16 AM, Mark Williamson
>> >>
>> >> <mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>> >> > On Wednesday 20 August 2008, Tej wrote:
>> >> >> Hi All
>> >> >>
>> >> >> As i was referring to the following link
>> >> >> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2007-06/msg00996.html
>> >> >>
>> >> >> but i can't see this work in official xen 3.2.
>> >> >> Is it still in review?
>> >> >
>> >> > I think I've seen activing reviewing of this patch set fairly recently so
>> >> > presumably it's still being worked on.  It doesn't look like it's made it
>> >> > into 3.3, so I guess 3.4 would be the soonest we'd expect it...
>> >> >
>> >> >> Or can i use the same patches to perform some NPIV task.
>> >> >
>> >> > If you're willing to try experimental software you could probably patch
>> >> > the code yourself - you might need to be prepared to do some merging in
>> >> > places if the Xen tree has diverged from the state that the patches
>> >> > expect...
>> >> >
>> >> > You should try to make sure you have the most recent patches possible -
>> >> > I'm sure they've been updated several times since the mailing list post
>> >> > that you found.
>> >>
>> >> thanks, i will go ahead with the solution.
>> >>
>> >> > Cheers,
>> >> > Mark
>> >> >
>> >> >> thanks in advance for any help
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -TEJ
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Push Me Pull You - Distributed SCM tool
>> >> > (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~maw48/pmpu/)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Push Me Pull You - Distributed SCM tool (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~maw48/pmpu/)
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
>
> -----
> Jun Kamada
>
>
>

Re: Re: FC Transport layer in xen

[Jun Kamada]

Hi,

The ptaches you are using are very old, so I can't remember detail about
them. Only I can say is:

- "Attach" operation is needed in order to attach specfied HBA to 
  guest domain. (To do so, some information should be wriiten to
  xenstore. However, these patches did not contain tool to do it, 
  meybe, because the patches were just for RFC.)
- After that operation, you can see SCSI disks under the HBA as 
  /dev/sd?? on the guest domain.
- If you can successfully see the disks, you can see any information
  about FC transport layer at /sys/class/*.

Best regards,


On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:09:05 +0530
Tej <bewith.tej@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Jun Kamada <kama@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > Hi Tej-san Mark-san and all,
> >
> > Unfortunately, the pvSCSI driver for Xen 3.3 does not support FC
> > transport layer functionality. I consider that at least new export
> > mode, which exports whole physical SCSI tree under a HBA to guest
> > domain, is needed. (FC transport functionality assumes physical
> > topology, I think.)
> Actually i am still at compilation and building stage of xen 3.3 and
> will get back  on this.
> Currently we are using the patches indicated in my previous post. i
> could get the following.
> 1. I am able to access and see all the disk on SAN in dom0 i.e. cat
> /proc/scsi/scsi list all the disk.
> 2. domU could not able to see that FC HBA driver itself, i will try
> with directly assigning the PCI device to domU (HTH)
> Front-back arch. could not be the culprit because this arch. is
> applicable to dom0 also.
> 
> so what i am missing?
> 
> thanks
> -tej
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:07:25 +0530
> > Tej <bewith.tej@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 6:53 AM, Mark Williamson
> >> <mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> >> > Actually, the PVSCSI *was* mentioned in the 3.3 release announcement so I
> >> > think you should find it there...
> >>
> >> yaa i was looking at 3.3 release notes, but i couldn't relate PVSCSCI to it
> >> thanks for this pointers
> >>
> >> >
> >> > The header file seems not to have made its way into xen/include/public/io/
> >> > along with the other front/back interface definitions.  It is in the XenLinux
> >> > copy of that directory, though, which I hadn't checked.
> >> >
> >> > 3.3 is probably worth looking at, then ;-)
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Mark
> >> >
> >> > On Saturday 23 August 2008, Tej wrote:
> >> >> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:16 AM, Mark Williamson
> >> >>
> >> >> <mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> >> >> > On Wednesday 20 August 2008, Tej wrote:
> >> >> >> Hi All
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> As i was referring to the following link
> >> >> >> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2007-06/msg00996.html
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> but i can't see this work in official xen 3.2.
> >> >> >> Is it still in review?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I think I've seen activing reviewing of this patch set fairly recently so
> >> >> > presumably it's still being worked on.  It doesn't look like it's made it
> >> >> > into 3.3, so I guess 3.4 would be the soonest we'd expect it...
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Or can i use the same patches to perform some NPIV task.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > If you're willing to try experimental software you could probably patch
> >> >> > the code yourself - you might need to be prepared to do some merging in
> >> >> > places if the Xen tree has diverged from the state that the patches
> >> >> > expect...
> >> >> >
> >> >> > You should try to make sure you have the most recent patches possible -
> >> >> > I'm sure they've been updated several times since the mailing list post
> >> >> > that you found.
> >> >>
> >> >> thanks, i will go ahead with the solution.
> >> >>
> >> >> > Cheers,
> >> >> > Mark
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> thanks in advance for any help
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> -TEJ
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > Push Me Pull You - Distributed SCM tool
> >> >> > (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~maw48/pmpu/)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Push Me Pull You - Distributed SCM tool (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~maw48/pmpu/)
> >> >
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Xen-devel mailing list
> >> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> >
> >
> > -----
> > Jun Kamada
> >
> >
> >


-----
Jun Kamada

Re: Re: FC Transport layer in xen

[Tej]

On 8/26/08, Jun Kamada <kama@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The ptaches you are using are very old, so I can't remember detail about
> them. Only I can say is:
>
> - "Attach" operation is needed in order to attach specfied HBA to
>   guest domain. (To do so, some information should be wriiten to
>   xenstore. However, these patches did not contain tool to do it,
>   meybe, because the patches were just for RFC.)
> - After that operation, you can see SCSI disks under the HBA as
>   /dev/sd?? on the guest domain.
> - If you can successfully see the disks, you can see any information
>   about FC transport layer at /sys/class/*.

after using PCI-PASSTHROUG FC-HBA is visible in the domU.

1.
-----------
domU output:
root@guest03:~# lspci
01:05.0 Fibre Channel: QLogic Corp. ISP2312-based 2Gb Fibre Channel to
PCI-X HBA (rev 02)

2.
------
root@guest03:~# cat /proc/scsi/scsi
Attached devices:

proc/scsi does not show any output.

3. Dmesg for qlogic while booting domU.
qla2xxx 0000:01:05.0: Found an ISP2312, irq 18, iobase 0xc903c000
qla2xxx 0000:01:05.0: Configuring PCI space...
qla2xxx 0000:01:05.0: Configure NVRAM parameters...
qla2xxx 0000:01:05.0: Verifying loaded RISC code...
qla2xxx 0000:01:05.0: Firmware image unavailable.
qla2xxx 0000:01:05.0: Firmware images can be retrieved from:
ftp://ftp.qlogic.com/outgoing/linux/firmware/.
qla2x00_initialize_adapter(): **** FAILED ****
qla2xxx 0000:01:05.0: Failed to initialize adapter

it is complaining about some  Firmware image unavailable

4.
--------
/sys/class/fc_host shows nothing
root@guest03:/sys/class# ls -l /sys/class/fc_host/
total 0
root@guest03:/sys/class#


Now how do i access these scsi device in domU using pci passthrough.

Any pointers will be approciated.

thanks
-tej
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:09:05 +0530
> Tej <bewith.tej@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Jun Kamada <kama@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Tej-san Mark-san and all,
>> >
>> > Unfortunately, the pvSCSI driver for Xen 3.3 does not support FC
>> > transport layer functionality. I consider that at least new export
>> > mode, which exports whole physical SCSI tree under a HBA to guest
>> > domain, is needed. (FC transport functionality assumes physical
>> > topology, I think.)
>> Actually i am still at compilation and building stage of xen 3.3 and
>> will get back  on this.
>> Currently we are using the patches indicated in my previous post. i
>> could get the following.
>> 1. I am able to access and see all the disk on SAN in dom0 i.e. cat
>> /proc/scsi/scsi list all the disk.
>> 2. domU could not able to see that FC HBA driver itself, i will try
>> with directly assigning the PCI device to domU (HTH)
>> Front-back arch. could not be the culprit because this arch. is
>> applicable to dom0 also.
>>
>> so what i am missing?
>>
>> thanks
>> -tej
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:07:25 +0530
>> > Tej <bewith.tej@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 6:53 AM, Mark Williamson
>> >> <mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>> >> > Actually, the PVSCSI *was* mentioned in the 3.3 release announcement
>> >> > so I
>> >> > think you should find it there...
>> >>
>> >> yaa i was looking at 3.3 release notes, but i couldn't relate PVSCSCI
>> >> to it
>> >> thanks for this pointers
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > The header file seems not to have made its way into
>> >> > xen/include/public/io/
>> >> > along with the other front/back interface definitions.  It is in the
>> >> > XenLinux
>> >> > copy of that directory, though, which I hadn't checked.
>> >> >
>> >> > 3.3 is probably worth looking at, then ;-)
>> >> >
>> >> > Cheers,
>> >> > Mark
>> >> >
>> >> > On Saturday 23 August 2008, Tej wrote:
>> >> >> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:16 AM, Mark Williamson
>> >> >>
>> >> >> <mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>> >> >> > On Wednesday 20 August 2008, Tej wrote:
>> >> >> >> Hi All
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> As i was referring to the following link
>> >> >> >> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2007-06/msg00996.html
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> but i can't see this work in official xen 3.2.
>> >> >> >> Is it still in review?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I think I've seen activing reviewing of this patch set fairly
>> >> >> > recently so
>> >> >> > presumably it's still being worked on.  It doesn't look like it's
>> >> >> > made it
>> >> >> > into 3.3, so I guess 3.4 would be the soonest we'd expect it...
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Or can i use the same patches to perform some NPIV task.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > If you're willing to try experimental software you could probably
>> >> >> > patch
>> >> >> > the code yourself - you might need to be prepared to do some
>> >> >> > merging in
>> >> >> > places if the Xen tree has diverged from the state that the
>> >> >> > patches
>> >> >> > expect...
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > You should try to make sure you have the most recent patches
>> >> >> > possible -
>> >> >> > I'm sure they've been updated several times since the mailing list
>> >> >> > post
>> >> >> > that you found.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> thanks, i will go ahead with the solution.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Cheers,
>> >> >> > Mark
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> thanks in advance for any help
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> -TEJ
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> > Push Me Pull You - Distributed SCM tool
>> >> >> > (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~maw48/pmpu/)
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Push Me Pull You - Distributed SCM tool
>> >> > (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~maw48/pmpu/)
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Xen-devel mailing list
>> >> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>> >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> >
>> >
>> > -----
>> > Jun Kamada
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
> -----
> Jun Kamada
>
>
>