Re: [PATCH] OMAP: MMC: recover from transfer failures - Resend

From: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@drzeus.cx>
To: Jean Pihet <jpihet@mvista.com>, tony@atomide.com
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, jarkko.lavinen@nokia.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP: MMC: recover from transfer failures - Resend
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:53:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090206145343.2b8a5353@mjolnir.drzeus.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200902061422.32689.jpihet@mvista.com>

On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:22:32 +0100
Jean Pihet <jpihet@mvista.com> wrote:

> On Thursday 05 February 2009 21:32:03 Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > An infinite loop which assumes the hardware is perfect is always a
> > > worry.  But I see the driver already does that, so we're no worse off..
> Do you want a finite loop with udelay in it? I located 4 places were this 
> could be used. If so I can generate a new patch for that.
> 

Even if Andrew doesn't, I'd sure like it. (the finite bit at least) :)

Related, who is the maintainer of this driver? Tony? I'd like to have
someone who checks patches before I queue them up.

Rgds
-- 
     -- Pierre Ossman

  Linux kernel, MMC maintainer        http://www.kernel.org
  rdesktop, core developer          http://www.rdesktop.org

  WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
  Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
  for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
  encryption.