* [PATCH] vmalloc: Add __get_vm_area_caller() @ 2009-02-11 4:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2009-02-11 4:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Memory Management; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, Andrew Morton We have get_vm_area_caller() and __get_vm_area() but not __get_vm_area_caller() On powerpc, I use __get_vm_area() to separate the ranges of addresses given to vmalloc vs. ioremap (various good reasons for that) so in order to be able to implement the new caller tracking in /proc/vmallocinfo, I need a "_caller" variant of it. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> --- I want to put into powerpc-next patches relying into that, so if the patch is ok with you guys, can I stick it in powerpc.git ? include/linux/vmalloc.h | 3 +++ mm/vmalloc.c | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+) --- linux-work.orig/include/linux/vmalloc.h 2009-02-04 15:33:35.000000000 +1100 +++ linux-work/include/linux/vmalloc.h 2009-02-04 15:33:47.000000000 +1100 @@ -84,6 +84,9 @@ extern struct vm_struct *get_vm_area_cal unsigned long flags, void *caller); extern struct vm_struct *__get_vm_area(unsigned long size, unsigned long flags, unsigned long start, unsigned long end); +extern struct vm_struct *__get_vm_area_caller(unsigned long size, unsigned long flags, + unsigned long start, unsigned long end, + void *caller); extern struct vm_struct *get_vm_area_node(unsigned long size, unsigned long flags, int node, gfp_t gfp_mask); Index: linux-work/mm/vmalloc.c =================================================================== --- linux-work.orig/mm/vmalloc.c 2009-02-04 15:32:47.000000000 +1100 +++ linux-work/mm/vmalloc.c 2009-02-04 15:33:25.000000000 +1100 @@ -1106,6 +1106,14 @@ struct vm_struct *__get_vm_area(unsigned } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__get_vm_area); +struct vm_struct *__get_vm_area_caller(unsigned long size, unsigned long flags, + unsigned long start, unsigned long end, + void *caller) +{ + return __get_vm_area_node(size, flags, start, end, -1, GFP_KERNEL, + caller); +} + /** * get_vm_area - reserve a contiguous kernel virtual area * @size: size of the area ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] vmalloc: Add __get_vm_area_caller() @ 2009-02-11 4:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2009-02-11 4:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Memory Management; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Andrew Morton, linux-kernel We have get_vm_area_caller() and __get_vm_area() but not __get_vm_area_caller() On powerpc, I use __get_vm_area() to separate the ranges of addresses given to vmalloc vs. ioremap (various good reasons for that) so in order to be able to implement the new caller tracking in /proc/vmallocinfo, I need a "_caller" variant of it. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> --- I want to put into powerpc-next patches relying into that, so if the patch is ok with you guys, can I stick it in powerpc.git ? include/linux/vmalloc.h | 3 +++ mm/vmalloc.c | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+) --- linux-work.orig/include/linux/vmalloc.h 2009-02-04 15:33:35.000000000 +1100 +++ linux-work/include/linux/vmalloc.h 2009-02-04 15:33:47.000000000 +1100 @@ -84,6 +84,9 @@ extern struct vm_struct *get_vm_area_cal unsigned long flags, void *caller); extern struct vm_struct *__get_vm_area(unsigned long size, unsigned long flags, unsigned long start, unsigned long end); +extern struct vm_struct *__get_vm_area_caller(unsigned long size, unsigned long flags, + unsigned long start, unsigned long end, + void *caller); extern struct vm_struct *get_vm_area_node(unsigned long size, unsigned long flags, int node, gfp_t gfp_mask); Index: linux-work/mm/vmalloc.c =================================================================== --- linux-work.orig/mm/vmalloc.c 2009-02-04 15:32:47.000000000 +1100 +++ linux-work/mm/vmalloc.c 2009-02-04 15:33:25.000000000 +1100 @@ -1106,6 +1106,14 @@ struct vm_struct *__get_vm_area(unsigned } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__get_vm_area); +struct vm_struct *__get_vm_area_caller(unsigned long size, unsigned long flags, + unsigned long start, unsigned long end, + void *caller) +{ + return __get_vm_area_node(size, flags, start, end, -1, GFP_KERNEL, + caller); +} + /** * get_vm_area - reserve a contiguous kernel virtual area * @size: size of the area ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] vmalloc: Add __get_vm_area_caller() @ 2009-02-11 4:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2009-02-11 4:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Memory Management; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, Andrew Morton We have get_vm_area_caller() and __get_vm_area() but not __get_vm_area_caller() On powerpc, I use __get_vm_area() to separate the ranges of addresses given to vmalloc vs. ioremap (various good reasons for that) so in order to be able to implement the new caller tracking in /proc/vmallocinfo, I need a "_caller" variant of it. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> --- I want to put into powerpc-next patches relying into that, so if the patch is ok with you guys, can I stick it in powerpc.git ? include/linux/vmalloc.h | 3 +++ mm/vmalloc.c | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+) --- linux-work.orig/include/linux/vmalloc.h 2009-02-04 15:33:35.000000000 +1100 +++ linux-work/include/linux/vmalloc.h 2009-02-04 15:33:47.000000000 +1100 @@ -84,6 +84,9 @@ extern struct vm_struct *get_vm_area_cal unsigned long flags, void *caller); extern struct vm_struct *__get_vm_area(unsigned long size, unsigned long flags, unsigned long start, unsigned long end); +extern struct vm_struct *__get_vm_area_caller(unsigned long size, unsigned long flags, + unsigned long start, unsigned long end, + void *caller); extern struct vm_struct *get_vm_area_node(unsigned long size, unsigned long flags, int node, gfp_t gfp_mask); Index: linux-work/mm/vmalloc.c =================================================================== --- linux-work.orig/mm/vmalloc.c 2009-02-04 15:32:47.000000000 +1100 +++ linux-work/mm/vmalloc.c 2009-02-04 15:33:25.000000000 +1100 @@ -1106,6 +1106,14 @@ struct vm_struct *__get_vm_area(unsigned } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__get_vm_area); +struct vm_struct *__get_vm_area_caller(unsigned long size, unsigned long flags, + unsigned long start, unsigned long end, + void *caller) +{ + return __get_vm_area_node(size, flags, start, end, -1, GFP_KERNEL, + caller); +} + /** * get_vm_area - reserve a contiguous kernel virtual area * @size: size of the area -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] vmalloc: Add __get_vm_area_caller() 2009-02-11 4:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt (?) @ 2009-02-11 8:22 ` KOSAKI Motohiro -1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: KOSAKI Motohiro @ 2009-02-11 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: kosaki.motohiro, Linux Memory Management, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, Andrew Morton > We have get_vm_area_caller() and __get_vm_area() but not __get_vm_area_caller() > > On powerpc, I use __get_vm_area() to separate the ranges of addresses given > to vmalloc vs. ioremap (various good reasons for that) so in order to be > able to implement the new caller tracking in /proc/vmallocinfo, I need > a "_caller" variant of it. > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> It seems reasonable reason and this patch looks good to me :) Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> > I want to put into powerpc-next patches relying into that, so if the > patch is ok with you guys, can I stick it in powerpc.git ? hm. Generally, all MM patch should merge into -mm tree at first. but I don't think this patch have conflict risk. Andrew, What do you think? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] vmalloc: Add __get_vm_area_caller() @ 2009-02-11 8:22 ` KOSAKI Motohiro 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: KOSAKI Motohiro @ 2009-02-11 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Linux Memory Management, Andrew Morton, linux-kernel, kosaki.motohiro, linuxppc-dev > We have get_vm_area_caller() and __get_vm_area() but not __get_vm_area_caller() > > On powerpc, I use __get_vm_area() to separate the ranges of addresses given > to vmalloc vs. ioremap (various good reasons for that) so in order to be > able to implement the new caller tracking in /proc/vmallocinfo, I need > a "_caller" variant of it. > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> It seems reasonable reason and this patch looks good to me :) Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> > I want to put into powerpc-next patches relying into that, so if the > patch is ok with you guys, can I stick it in powerpc.git ? hm. Generally, all MM patch should merge into -mm tree at first. but I don't think this patch have conflict risk. Andrew, What do you think? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] vmalloc: Add __get_vm_area_caller() @ 2009-02-11 8:22 ` KOSAKI Motohiro 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: KOSAKI Motohiro @ 2009-02-11 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: kosaki.motohiro, Linux Memory Management, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, Andrew Morton > We have get_vm_area_caller() and __get_vm_area() but not __get_vm_area_caller() > > On powerpc, I use __get_vm_area() to separate the ranges of addresses given > to vmalloc vs. ioremap (various good reasons for that) so in order to be > able to implement the new caller tracking in /proc/vmallocinfo, I need > a "_caller" variant of it. > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> It seems reasonable reason and this patch looks good to me :) Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> > I want to put into powerpc-next patches relying into that, so if the > patch is ok with you guys, can I stick it in powerpc.git ? hm. Generally, all MM patch should merge into -mm tree at first. but I don't think this patch have conflict risk. Andrew, What do you think? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] vmalloc: Add __get_vm_area_caller() 2009-02-11 8:22 ` KOSAKI Motohiro (?) @ 2009-02-11 22:45 ` Andrew Morton -1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2009-02-11 22:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: benh, kosaki.motohiro, linux-mm, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:22:47 +0900 (JST) KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > I want to put into powerpc-next patches relying into that, so if the > > patch is ok with you guys, can I stick it in powerpc.git ? > > hm. > Generally, all MM patch should merge into -mm tree at first. > but I don't think this patch have conflict risk. > > Andrew, What do you think? We can sneak it into mainline later in the week? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] vmalloc: Add __get_vm_area_caller() @ 2009-02-11 22:45 ` Andrew Morton 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2009-02-11 22:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: KOSAKI Motohiro; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, kosaki.motohiro, linux-mm On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:22:47 +0900 (JST) KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > I want to put into powerpc-next patches relying into that, so if the > > patch is ok with you guys, can I stick it in powerpc.git ? > > hm. > Generally, all MM patch should merge into -mm tree at first. > but I don't think this patch have conflict risk. > > Andrew, What do you think? We can sneak it into mainline later in the week? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] vmalloc: Add __get_vm_area_caller() @ 2009-02-11 22:45 ` Andrew Morton 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2009-02-11 22:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: KOSAKI Motohiro; +Cc: benh, linux-mm, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:22:47 +0900 (JST) KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > I want to put into powerpc-next patches relying into that, so if the > > patch is ok with you guys, can I stick it in powerpc.git ? > > hm. > Generally, all MM patch should merge into -mm tree at first. > but I don't think this patch have conflict risk. > > Andrew, What do you think? We can sneak it into mainline later in the week? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] vmalloc: Add __get_vm_area_caller() 2009-02-11 22:45 ` Andrew Morton (?) @ 2009-02-11 23:53 ` KOSAKI Motohiro -1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: KOSAKI Motohiro @ 2009-02-11 23:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: kosaki.motohiro, benh, linux-mm, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel > On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:22:47 +0900 (JST) > KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > I want to put into powerpc-next patches relying into that, so if the > > > patch is ok with you guys, can I stick it in powerpc.git ? > > > > hm. > > Generally, all MM patch should merge into -mm tree at first. > > but I don't think this patch have conflict risk. > > > > Andrew, What do you think? > > We can sneak it into mainline later in the week? I think this patch obiously doesn't have any regression risk. I obey your judgement. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] vmalloc: Add __get_vm_area_caller() @ 2009-02-11 23:53 ` KOSAKI Motohiro 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: KOSAKI Motohiro @ 2009-02-11 23:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, kosaki.motohiro, linux-mm > On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:22:47 +0900 (JST) > KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > I want to put into powerpc-next patches relying into that, so if the > > > patch is ok with you guys, can I stick it in powerpc.git ? > > > > hm. > > Generally, all MM patch should merge into -mm tree at first. > > but I don't think this patch have conflict risk. > > > > Andrew, What do you think? > > We can sneak it into mainline later in the week? I think this patch obiously doesn't have any regression risk. I obey your judgement. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] vmalloc: Add __get_vm_area_caller() @ 2009-02-11 23:53 ` KOSAKI Motohiro 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: KOSAKI Motohiro @ 2009-02-11 23:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: kosaki.motohiro, benh, linux-mm, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel > On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:22:47 +0900 (JST) > KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > I want to put into powerpc-next patches relying into that, so if the > > > patch is ok with you guys, can I stick it in powerpc.git ? > > > > hm. > > Generally, all MM patch should merge into -mm tree at first. > > but I don't think this patch have conflict risk. > > > > Andrew, What do you think? > > We can sneak it into mainline later in the week? I think this patch obiously doesn't have any regression risk. I obey your judgement. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] vmalloc: Add __get_vm_area_caller() 2009-02-11 22:45 ` Andrew Morton ` (2 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2009-02-12 0:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt -1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2009-02-12 0:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro, linux-mm, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 14:45 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:22:47 +0900 (JST) > KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > I want to put into powerpc-next patches relying into that, so if the > > > patch is ok with you guys, can I stick it in powerpc.git ? > > > > hm. > > Generally, all MM patch should merge into -mm tree at first. > > but I don't think this patch have conflict risk. > > > > Andrew, What do you think? > > We can sneak it into mainline later in the week? That would be best. Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] vmalloc: Add __get_vm_area_caller() 2009-02-11 22:45 ` Andrew Morton ` (3 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2009-02-12 0:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt -1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2009-02-12 0:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, KOSAKI Motohiro, linuxppc-dev On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 14:45 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:22:47 +0900 (JST) > KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > I want to put into powerpc-next patches relying into that, so if the > > > patch is ok with you guys, can I stick it in powerpc.git ? > > > > hm. > > Generally, all MM patch should merge into -mm tree at first. > > but I don't think this patch have conflict risk. > > > > Andrew, What do you think? > > We can sneak it into mainline later in the week? That would be best. Cheers, Ben. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] vmalloc: Add __get_vm_area_caller() 2009-02-11 22:45 ` Andrew Morton (?) @ 2009-02-12 0:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt -1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2009-02-12 0:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro, linux-mm, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 14:45 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:22:47 +0900 (JST) > KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > I want to put into powerpc-next patches relying into that, so if the > > > patch is ok with you guys, can I stick it in powerpc.git ? > > > > hm. > > Generally, all MM patch should merge into -mm tree at first. > > but I don't think this patch have conflict risk. > > > > Andrew, What do you think? > > We can sneak it into mainline later in the week? That would be best. Cheers, Ben. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] vmalloc: Add __get_vm_area_caller() @ 2009-02-12 0:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2009-02-12 0:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, KOSAKI Motohiro, linuxppc-dev On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 14:45 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:22:47 +0900 (JST) > KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > I want to put into powerpc-next patches relying into that, so if the > > > patch is ok with you guys, can I stick it in powerpc.git ? > > > > hm. > > Generally, all MM patch should merge into -mm tree at first. > > but I don't think this patch have conflict risk. > > > > Andrew, What do you think? > > We can sneak it into mainline later in the week? That would be best. Cheers, Ben. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] vmalloc: Add __get_vm_area_caller() @ 2009-02-12 0:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2009-02-12 0:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro, linux-mm, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 14:45 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:22:47 +0900 (JST) > KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > I want to put into powerpc-next patches relying into that, so if the > > > patch is ok with you guys, can I stick it in powerpc.git ? > > > > hm. > > Generally, all MM patch should merge into -mm tree at first. > > but I don't think this patch have conflict risk. > > > > Andrew, What do you think? > > We can sneak it into mainline later in the week? That would be best. Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] vmalloc: Add __get_vm_area_caller() 2009-02-11 22:45 ` Andrew Morton ` (5 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2009-02-12 0:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt -1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2009-02-12 0:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro, linux-mm, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 14:45 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:22:47 +0900 (JST) > KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > I want to put into powerpc-next patches relying into that, so if the > > > patch is ok with you guys, can I stick it in powerpc.git ? > > > > hm. > > Generally, all MM patch should merge into -mm tree at first. > > but I don't think this patch have conflict risk. > > > > Andrew, What do you think? > > We can sneak it into mainline later in the week? That would be best. Cheers, Ben. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-02-12 0:12 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2009-02-11 4:48 [PATCH] vmalloc: Add __get_vm_area_caller() Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2009-02-11 4:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2009-02-11 4:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2009-02-11 8:22 ` KOSAKI Motohiro 2009-02-11 8:22 ` KOSAKI Motohiro 2009-02-11 8:22 ` KOSAKI Motohiro 2009-02-11 22:45 ` Andrew Morton 2009-02-11 22:45 ` Andrew Morton 2009-02-11 22:45 ` Andrew Morton 2009-02-11 23:53 ` KOSAKI Motohiro 2009-02-11 23:53 ` KOSAKI Motohiro 2009-02-11 23:53 ` KOSAKI Motohiro 2009-02-12 0:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2009-02-12 0:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2009-02-12 0:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2009-02-12 0:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2009-02-12 0:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2009-02-12 0:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.