* 2.6.30-rc2 hangs in get_measured_perf on tigerton
@ 2009-04-15 6:01 Zhang, Yanmin
2009-04-15 6:49 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-04-15 11:14 ` Rusty Russell
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Zhang, Yanmin @ 2009-04-15 6:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rusty Russell; +Cc: LKML, Venkatesh Pallipadi
My machine hanged with kernel 2.6.30-rc2 when script read
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor.
opps happens in get_measured_perf:
cur.aperf.whole = readin.aperf.whole -
per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)->saved_aperf;
Because per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)=NULL.
So function get_measured_perf should check if (per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)==NULL)
and return 0 if it's NULL.
Other functions have such checking.
yanmin
--------------sys log------------------
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000020
IP: [<ffffffff8021af75>] get_measured_perf+0x4a/0xf9
PGD a7dd88067 PUD a7ccf5067 PMD 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
last sysfs file: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
CPU 0
Modules linked in: video output
Pid: 2091, comm: kondemand/0 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc2 #1 MP Server
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8021af75>] [<ffffffff8021af75>] get_measured_perf+0x4a/0xf9
RSP: 0018:ffff880a7d56de20 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00000046241a42b6 RCX: ffff88004d219000
RDX: 000000000000b660 RSI: 0000000000000020 RDI: 0000000000000001
RBP: ffff880a7f052000 R08: 00000046241a42b6 R09: ffffffff807639f0
R10: 00000000ffffffea R11: ffffffff802207f4 R12: ffff880a7f052000
R13: ffff88004d20e460 R14: 0000000000ddd5a6 R15: 0000000000000001
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88004d200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 000000008005003b
CR2: 0000000000000020 CR3: 0000000a7f1bf000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Process kondemand/0 (pid: 2091, threadinfo ffff880a7d56c000, task ffff880a7d4d18c0)
Stack:
ffff880a7f052078 ffffffff803efd54 00000046241a42b6 000000462ffa9e95
0000000000000001 0000000000000001 00000000ffffffea ffffffff8064f41a
0000000000000012 0000000000000012 ffff880a7f052000 ffffffff80650547
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff803efd54>] ? kobject_get+0x12/0x17
[<ffffffff8064f41a>] ? __cpufreq_driver_getavg+0x42/0x57
[<ffffffff80650547>] ? do_dbs_timer+0x147/0x272
[<ffffffff80650400>] ? do_dbs_timer+0x0/0x272
[<ffffffff802474ca>] ? worker_thread+0x15b/0x1f5
[<ffffffff8024a02c>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
[<ffffffff8024736f>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x1f5
[<ffffffff80249f0d>] ? kthread+0x54/0x83
[<ffffffff8020c87a>] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
[<ffffffff80249eb9>] ? kthread+0x0/0x83
[<ffffffff8020c870>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
Code: 99 a6 03 00 31 c9 85 c0 0f 85 c3 00 00 00 89 df 4c 8b 44 24 10 48 c7 c2 60 b6 00 00 48 8b 0c fd e0 30 a5 80 4c 89 c3 48 8b 04 0a <48> 2b 58 20 48 8b 44 24 18 48 89 1c 24 48 8b 34 0a 48 2b 46 28
RIP [<ffffffff8021af75>] get_measured_perf+0x4a/0xf9
RSP <ffff880a7d56de20>
CR2: 0000000000000020
---[ end trace 2b8fac9a49e19ad4 ]---
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.30-rc2 hangs in get_measured_perf on tigerton
2009-04-15 6:01 2.6.30-rc2 hangs in get_measured_perf on tigerton Zhang, Yanmin
@ 2009-04-15 6:49 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-04-15 11:14 ` Rusty Russell
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Zhang, Yanmin @ 2009-04-15 6:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rusty Russell; +Cc: LKML, Venkatesh Pallipadi
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 14:01 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> My machine hanged with kernel 2.6.30-rc2 when script read
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor.
>
> opps happens in get_measured_perf:
>
> cur.aperf.whole = readin.aperf.whole -
> per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)->saved_aperf;
>
> Because per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)=NULL.
>
> So function get_measured_perf should check if (per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)==NULL)
> and return 0 if it's NULL.
>
> Other functions have such checking.
How about below patch? I tested it on my tigerton machine.
---
--- linux-2.6.30-rc2/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c 2009-04-15 02:24:38.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.30-rc2_cpufreqbug/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c 2009-04-15 02:31:37.000000000 -0400
@@ -277,6 +277,9 @@ static unsigned int get_measured_perf(st
unsigned int perf_percent;
unsigned int retval;
+ if (unlikely(per_cpu(drv_data, cpu) == NULL))
+ return 0;
+
if (smp_call_function_single(cpu, read_measured_perf_ctrs, &readin, 1))
return 0;
>
> yanmin
>
>
>
> --------------sys log------------------
>
> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000020
> IP: [<ffffffff8021af75>] get_measured_perf+0x4a/0xf9
> PGD a7dd88067 PUD a7ccf5067 PMD 0
> Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
> last sysfs file: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
> CPU 0
> Modules linked in: video output
> Pid: 2091, comm: kondemand/0 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc2 #1 MP Server
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8021af75>] [<ffffffff8021af75>] get_measured_perf+0x4a/0xf9
> RSP: 0018:ffff880a7d56de20 EFLAGS: 00010246
> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00000046241a42b6 RCX: ffff88004d219000
> RDX: 000000000000b660 RSI: 0000000000000020 RDI: 0000000000000001
> RBP: ffff880a7f052000 R08: 00000046241a42b6 R09: ffffffff807639f0
> R10: 00000000ffffffea R11: ffffffff802207f4 R12: ffff880a7f052000
> R13: ffff88004d20e460 R14: 0000000000ddd5a6 R15: 0000000000000001
> FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88004d200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 000000008005003b
> CR2: 0000000000000020 CR3: 0000000a7f1bf000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Process kondemand/0 (pid: 2091, threadinfo ffff880a7d56c000, task ffff880a7d4d18c0)
> Stack:
> ffff880a7f052078 ffffffff803efd54 00000046241a42b6 000000462ffa9e95
> 0000000000000001 0000000000000001 00000000ffffffea ffffffff8064f41a
> 0000000000000012 0000000000000012 ffff880a7f052000 ffffffff80650547
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff803efd54>] ? kobject_get+0x12/0x17
> [<ffffffff8064f41a>] ? __cpufreq_driver_getavg+0x42/0x57
> [<ffffffff80650547>] ? do_dbs_timer+0x147/0x272
> [<ffffffff80650400>] ? do_dbs_timer+0x0/0x272
> [<ffffffff802474ca>] ? worker_thread+0x15b/0x1f5
> [<ffffffff8024a02c>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
> [<ffffffff8024736f>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x1f5
> [<ffffffff80249f0d>] ? kthread+0x54/0x83
> [<ffffffff8020c87a>] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
> [<ffffffff80249eb9>] ? kthread+0x0/0x83
> [<ffffffff8020c870>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
> Code: 99 a6 03 00 31 c9 85 c0 0f 85 c3 00 00 00 89 df 4c 8b 44 24 10 48 c7 c2 60 b6 00 00 48 8b 0c fd e0 30 a5 80 4c 89 c3 48 8b 04 0a <48> 2b 58 20 48 8b 44 24 18 48 89 1c 24 48 8b 34 0a 48 2b 46 28
> RIP [<ffffffff8021af75>] get_measured_perf+0x4a/0xf9
> RSP <ffff880a7d56de20>
> CR2: 0000000000000020
> ---[ end trace 2b8fac9a49e19ad4 ]---
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.30-rc2 hangs in get_measured_perf on tigerton
2009-04-15 6:01 2.6.30-rc2 hangs in get_measured_perf on tigerton Zhang, Yanmin
@ 2009-04-15 11:14 ` Rusty Russell
2009-04-15 11:14 ` Rusty Russell
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Rusty Russell @ 2009-04-15 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhang, Yanmin
Cc: LKML, Venkatesh Pallipadi, Denis Sadykov, cpufreq, linux-acpi
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:31:23 pm Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> My machine hanged with kernel 2.6.30-rc2 when script read
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor.
>
> opps happens in get_measured_perf:
>
> cur.aperf.whole = readin.aperf.whole -
> per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)->saved_aperf;
>
> Because per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)=NULL.
>
> So function get_measured_perf should check if (per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)==NULL)
> and return 0 if it's NULL.
>
> Other functions have such checking.
Possibly true, but I can't see that get_measured_perf() ever did.
Unless there's something subtle with preemption no longer being disabled
inside that function...
Cc'd the experts.
Thanks,
Rusty.
>
> yanmin
>
>
>
> --------------sys log------------------
>
> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000020
> IP: [<ffffffff8021af75>] get_measured_perf+0x4a/0xf9
> PGD a7dd88067 PUD a7ccf5067 PMD 0
> Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
> last sysfs file: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
> CPU 0
> Modules linked in: video output
> Pid: 2091, comm: kondemand/0 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc2 #1 MP Server
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8021af75>] [<ffffffff8021af75>] get_measured_perf+0x4a/0xf9
> RSP: 0018:ffff880a7d56de20 EFLAGS: 00010246
> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00000046241a42b6 RCX: ffff88004d219000
> RDX: 000000000000b660 RSI: 0000000000000020 RDI: 0000000000000001
> RBP: ffff880a7f052000 R08: 00000046241a42b6 R09: ffffffff807639f0
> R10: 00000000ffffffea R11: ffffffff802207f4 R12: ffff880a7f052000
> R13: ffff88004d20e460 R14: 0000000000ddd5a6 R15: 0000000000000001
> FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88004d200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 000000008005003b
> CR2: 0000000000000020 CR3: 0000000a7f1bf000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Process kondemand/0 (pid: 2091, threadinfo ffff880a7d56c000, task ffff880a7d4d18c0)
> Stack:
> ffff880a7f052078 ffffffff803efd54 00000046241a42b6 000000462ffa9e95
> 0000000000000001 0000000000000001 00000000ffffffea ffffffff8064f41a
> 0000000000000012 0000000000000012 ffff880a7f052000 ffffffff80650547
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff803efd54>] ? kobject_get+0x12/0x17
> [<ffffffff8064f41a>] ? __cpufreq_driver_getavg+0x42/0x57
> [<ffffffff80650547>] ? do_dbs_timer+0x147/0x272
> [<ffffffff80650400>] ? do_dbs_timer+0x0/0x272
> [<ffffffff802474ca>] ? worker_thread+0x15b/0x1f5
> [<ffffffff8024a02c>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
> [<ffffffff8024736f>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x1f5
> [<ffffffff80249f0d>] ? kthread+0x54/0x83
> [<ffffffff8020c87a>] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
> [<ffffffff80249eb9>] ? kthread+0x0/0x83
> [<ffffffff8020c870>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
> Code: 99 a6 03 00 31 c9 85 c0 0f 85 c3 00 00 00 89 df 4c 8b 44 24 10 48 c7 c2 60 b6 00 00 48 8b 0c fd e0 30 a5 80 4c 89 c3 48 8b 04 0a <48> 2b 58 20 48 8b 44 24 18 48 89 1c 24 48 8b 34 0a 48 2b 46 28
> RIP [<ffffffff8021af75>] get_measured_perf+0x4a/0xf9
> RSP <ffff880a7d56de20>
> CR2: 0000000000000020
> ---[ end trace 2b8fac9a49e19ad4 ]---
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.30-rc2 hangs in get_measured_perf on tigerton
@ 2009-04-15 11:14 ` Rusty Russell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Rusty Russell @ 2009-04-15 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhang, Yanmin
Cc: LKML, Venkatesh Pallipadi, Denis Sadykov, cpufreq, linux-acpi
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:31:23 pm Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> My machine hanged with kernel 2.6.30-rc2 when script read
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor.
>
> opps happens in get_measured_perf:
>
> cur.aperf.whole = readin.aperf.whole -
> per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)->saved_aperf;
>
> Because per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)=NULL.
>
> So function get_measured_perf should check if (per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)==NULL)
> and return 0 if it's NULL.
>
> Other functions have such checking.
Possibly true, but I can't see that get_measured_perf() ever did.
Unless there's something subtle with preemption no longer being disabled
inside that function...
Cc'd the experts.
Thanks,
Rusty.
>
> yanmin
>
>
>
> --------------sys log------------------
>
> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000020
> IP: [<ffffffff8021af75>] get_measured_perf+0x4a/0xf9
> PGD a7dd88067 PUD a7ccf5067 PMD 0
> Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
> last sysfs file: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
> CPU 0
> Modules linked in: video output
> Pid: 2091, comm: kondemand/0 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc2 #1 MP Server
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8021af75>] [<ffffffff8021af75>] get_measured_perf+0x4a/0xf9
> RSP: 0018:ffff880a7d56de20 EFLAGS: 00010246
> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00000046241a42b6 RCX: ffff88004d219000
> RDX: 000000000000b660 RSI: 0000000000000020 RDI: 0000000000000001
> RBP: ffff880a7f052000 R08: 00000046241a42b6 R09: ffffffff807639f0
> R10: 00000000ffffffea R11: ffffffff802207f4 R12: ffff880a7f052000
> R13: ffff88004d20e460 R14: 0000000000ddd5a6 R15: 0000000000000001
> FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88004d200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 000000008005003b
> CR2: 0000000000000020 CR3: 0000000a7f1bf000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Process kondemand/0 (pid: 2091, threadinfo ffff880a7d56c000, task ffff880a7d4d18c0)
> Stack:
> ffff880a7f052078 ffffffff803efd54 00000046241a42b6 000000462ffa9e95
> 0000000000000001 0000000000000001 00000000ffffffea ffffffff8064f41a
> 0000000000000012 0000000000000012 ffff880a7f052000 ffffffff80650547
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff803efd54>] ? kobject_get+0x12/0x17
> [<ffffffff8064f41a>] ? __cpufreq_driver_getavg+0x42/0x57
> [<ffffffff80650547>] ? do_dbs_timer+0x147/0x272
> [<ffffffff80650400>] ? do_dbs_timer+0x0/0x272
> [<ffffffff802474ca>] ? worker_thread+0x15b/0x1f5
> [<ffffffff8024a02c>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
> [<ffffffff8024736f>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x1f5
> [<ffffffff80249f0d>] ? kthread+0x54/0x83
> [<ffffffff8020c87a>] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
> [<ffffffff80249eb9>] ? kthread+0x0/0x83
> [<ffffffff8020c870>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
> Code: 99 a6 03 00 31 c9 85 c0 0f 85 c3 00 00 00 89 df 4c 8b 44 24 10 48 c7 c2 60 b6 00 00 48 8b 0c fd e0 30 a5 80 4c 89 c3 48 8b 04 0a <48> 2b 58 20 48 8b 44 24 18 48 89 1c 24 48 8b 34 0a 48 2b 46 28
> RIP [<ffffffff8021af75>] get_measured_perf+0x4a/0xf9
> RSP <ffff880a7d56de20>
> CR2: 0000000000000020
> ---[ end trace 2b8fac9a49e19ad4 ]---
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* RE: 2.6.30-rc2 hangs in get_measured_perf on tigerton
2009-04-15 11:14 ` Rusty Russell
@ 2009-04-15 13:31 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Pallipadi, Venkatesh @ 2009-04-15 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rusty Russell, Zhang, Yanmin; +Cc: LKML, Denis Sadykov, cpufreq, linux-acpi
>-----Original Message-----
>From: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org
>[mailto:cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Rusty Russell
>Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 4:14 AM
>To: Zhang, Yanmin
>Cc: LKML; Pallipadi, Venkatesh; Denis Sadykov;
>cpufreq@vger.kernel.org; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: 2.6.30-rc2 hangs in get_measured_perf on tigerton
>
>On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:31:23 pm Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
>> My machine hanged with kernel 2.6.30-rc2 when script read
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor.
>>
>> opps happens in get_measured_perf:
>>
>> cur.aperf.whole = readin.aperf.whole -
>> per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)->saved_aperf;
>>
>> Because per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)=NULL.
>>
>> So function get_measured_perf should check if
>(per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)==NULL)
>> and return 0 if it's NULL.
>>
>> Other functions have such checking.
>
>Possibly true, but I can't see that get_measured_perf() ever did.
>
>Unless there's something subtle with preemption no longer
>being disabled
>inside that function...
>
Checking the NULL and returning is not an option. We need to
look at average current freq on all CPUs to make correct
next freq decision. Also, per_cpu drv_data should be set
for all CPUs. I will poke a bit at this and get back...
Thanks,
Venki
>>
>>
>> --------------sys log------------------
>>
>> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
>0000000000000020
>> IP: [<ffffffff8021af75>] get_measured_perf+0x4a/0xf9
>> PGD a7dd88067 PUD a7ccf5067 PMD 0
>> Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
>> last sysfs file:
>/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
>> CPU 0
>> Modules linked in: video output
>> Pid: 2091, comm: kondemand/0 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc2 #1 MP Server
>> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8021af75>] [<ffffffff8021af75>]
>get_measured_perf+0x4a/0xf9
>> RSP: 0018:ffff880a7d56de20 EFLAGS: 00010246
>> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00000046241a42b6 RCX: ffff88004d219000
>> RDX: 000000000000b660 RSI: 0000000000000020 RDI: 0000000000000001
>> RBP: ffff880a7f052000 R08: 00000046241a42b6 R09: ffffffff807639f0
>> R10: 00000000ffffffea R11: ffffffff802207f4 R12: ffff880a7f052000
>> R13: ffff88004d20e460 R14: 0000000000ddd5a6 R15: 0000000000000001
>> FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88004d200000(0000)
>knlGS:0000000000000000
>> CS: 0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 000000008005003b
>> CR2: 0000000000000020 CR3: 0000000a7f1bf000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
>> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
>> Process kondemand/0 (pid: 2091, threadinfo ffff880a7d56c000,
>task ffff880a7d4d18c0)
>> Stack:
>> ffff880a7f052078 ffffffff803efd54 00000046241a42b6 000000462ffa9e95
>> 0000000000000001 0000000000000001 00000000ffffffea ffffffff8064f41a
>> 0000000000000012 0000000000000012 ffff880a7f052000 ffffffff80650547
>> Call Trace:
>> [<ffffffff803efd54>] ? kobject_get+0x12/0x17
>> [<ffffffff8064f41a>] ? __cpufreq_driver_getavg+0x42/0x57
>> [<ffffffff80650547>] ? do_dbs_timer+0x147/0x272
>> [<ffffffff80650400>] ? do_dbs_timer+0x0/0x272
>> [<ffffffff802474ca>] ? worker_thread+0x15b/0x1f5
>> [<ffffffff8024a02c>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
>> [<ffffffff8024736f>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x1f5
>> [<ffffffff80249f0d>] ? kthread+0x54/0x83
>> [<ffffffff8020c87a>] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
>> [<ffffffff80249eb9>] ? kthread+0x0/0x83
>> [<ffffffff8020c870>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
>> Code: 99 a6 03 00 31 c9 85 c0 0f 85 c3 00 00 00 89 df 4c 8b
>44 24 10 48 c7 c2 60 b6 00 00 48 8b 0c fd e0 30 a5 80 4c 89 c3
>48 8b 04 0a <48> 2b 58 20 48 8b 44 24 18 48 89 1c 24 48 8b 34
>0a 48 2b 46 28
>> RIP [<ffffffff8021af75>] get_measured_perf+0x4a/0xf9
>> RSP <ffff880a7d56de20>
>> CR2: 0000000000000020
>> ---[ end trace 2b8fac9a49e19ad4 ]---
>>
>>
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* RE: 2.6.30-rc2 hangs in get_measured_perf on tigerton
@ 2009-04-15 13:31 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Pallipadi, Venkatesh @ 2009-04-15 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rusty Russell, Zhang, Yanmin; +Cc: LKML, Denis Sadykov, cpufreq, linux-acpi
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8", Size: 4210 bytes --]
>-----Original Message-----
>From: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org
>[mailto:cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Rusty Russell
>Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 4:14 AM
>To: Zhang, Yanmin
>Cc: LKML; Pallipadi, Venkatesh; Denis Sadykov;
>cpufreq@vger.kernel.org; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: 2.6.30-rc2 hangs in get_measured_perf on tigerton
>
>On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:31:23 pm Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
>> My machine hanged with kernel 2.6.30-rc2 when script read
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor.
>>
>> opps happens in get_measured_perf:
>>
>> cur.aperf.whole = readin.aperf.whole -
>> per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)->saved_aperf;
>>
>> Because per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)=NULL.
>>
>> So function get_measured_perf should check if
>(per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)==NULL)
>> and return 0 if it's NULL.
>>
>> Other functions have such checking.
>
>Possibly true, but I can't see that get_measured_perf() ever did.
>
>Unless there's something subtle with preemption no longer
>being disabled
>inside that function...
>
Checking the NULL and returning is not an option. We need to
look at average current freq on all CPUs to make correct
next freq decision. Also, per_cpu drv_data should be set
for all CPUs. I will poke a bit at this and get back...
Thanks,
Venki
>>
>>
>> --------------sys log------------------
>>
>> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
>0000000000000020
>> IP: [<ffffffff8021af75>] get_measured_perf+0x4a/0xf9
>> PGD a7dd88067 PUD a7ccf5067 PMD 0
>> Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
>> last sysfs file:
>/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
>> CPU 0
>> Modules linked in: video output
>> Pid: 2091, comm: kondemand/0 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc2 #1 MP Server
>> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8021af75>] [<ffffffff8021af75>]
>get_measured_perf+0x4a/0xf9
>> RSP: 0018:ffff880a7d56de20 EFLAGS: 00010246
>> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00000046241a42b6 RCX: ffff88004d219000
>> RDX: 000000000000b660 RSI: 0000000000000020 RDI: 0000000000000001
>> RBP: ffff880a7f052000 R08: 00000046241a42b6 R09: ffffffff807639f0
>> R10: 00000000ffffffea R11: ffffffff802207f4 R12: ffff880a7f052000
>> R13: ffff88004d20e460 R14: 0000000000ddd5a6 R15: 0000000000000001
>> FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88004d200000(0000)
>knlGS:0000000000000000
>> CS: 0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 000000008005003b
>> CR2: 0000000000000020 CR3: 0000000a7f1bf000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
>> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
>> Process kondemand/0 (pid: 2091, threadinfo ffff880a7d56c000,
>task ffff880a7d4d18c0)
>> Stack:
>> ffff880a7f052078 ffffffff803efd54 00000046241a42b6 000000462ffa9e95
>> 0000000000000001 0000000000000001 00000000ffffffea ffffffff8064f41a
>> 0000000000000012 0000000000000012 ffff880a7f052000 ffffffff80650547
>> Call Trace:
>> [<ffffffff803efd54>] ? kobject_get+0x12/0x17
>> [<ffffffff8064f41a>] ? __cpufreq_driver_getavg+0x42/0x57
>> [<ffffffff80650547>] ? do_dbs_timer+0x147/0x272
>> [<ffffffff80650400>] ? do_dbs_timer+0x0/0x272
>> [<ffffffff802474ca>] ? worker_thread+0x15b/0x1f5
>> [<ffffffff8024a02c>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
>> [<ffffffff8024736f>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x1f5
>> [<ffffffff80249f0d>] ? kthread+0x54/0x83
>> [<ffffffff8020c87a>] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
>> [<ffffffff80249eb9>] ? kthread+0x0/0x83
>> [<ffffffff8020c870>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
>> Code: 99 a6 03 00 31 c9 85 c0 0f 85 c3 00 00 00 89 df 4c 8b
>44 24 10 48 c7 c2 60 b6 00 00 48 8b 0c fd e0 30 a5 80 4c 89 c3
>48 8b 04 0a <48> 2b 58 20 48 8b 44 24 18 48 89 1c 24 48 8b 34
>0a 48 2b 46 28
>> RIP [<ffffffff8021af75>] get_measured_perf+0x4a/0xf9
>> RSP <ffff880a7d56de20>
>> CR2: 0000000000000020
>> ---[ end trace 2b8fac9a49e19ad4 ]---
>>
>>
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>ÿôèº{.nÇ+·®+%Ëÿ±éݶ\x17¥wÿº{.nÇ+·¥{±þG«éÿ{ayº\x1dÊÚë,j\a¢f£¢·hïêÿêçz_è®\x03(éÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?¨èÚ&£ø§~á¶iOæ¬z·vØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?I¥
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] x86, acpi_cpufreq: Fix the NULL pointer dereference in get_measured_perf
[not found] ` <B5B0CFF685D7DF46A05CF1678CFB42ED20E09E32@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
@ 2009-04-15 17:37 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-04-16 1:20 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-04-18 4:11 ` Len Brown
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Pallipadi, Venkatesh @ 2009-04-15 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhang, Yanmin; +Cc: Rusty Russell, LKML, cpufreq, linux-acpi, lenb
Patch below fixes the problem. Yanmin can you please verify.
Len please push this patch along to linus.
Thanks,
Venki
Fix for a regression that was introduced by earlier commit
commit 18b2646fe3babeb40b34a0c1751e0bf5adfdc64c
Author: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Date: Mon Apr 6 11:26:08 2009 -0700
Regression resulted in the below error happened on systems with
software coordination where per_cpu acpi data will not be initiated for
secondary CPUs in a P-state domain.
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 23:01 -0700, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
My machine hanged with kernel 2.6.30-rc2 when script read
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor.
>
> opps happens in get_measured_perf:
>
> cur.aperf.whole = readin.aperf.whole -
> per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)->saved_aperf;
>
> Because per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)=NULL.
>
> So function get_measured_perf should check if (per_cpu(drv_data,
> cpu)==NULL)
> and return 0 if it's NULL.
--------------sys log------------------
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
0000000000000020
IP: [<ffffffff8021af75>] get_measured_perf+0x4a/0xf9
PGD a7dd88067 PUD a7ccf5067 PMD 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
last sysfs file: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
CPU 0
Modules linked in: video output
Pid: 2091, comm: kondemand/0 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc2 #1 MP Server
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8021af75>] [<ffffffff8021af75>]
get_measured_perf+0x4a/0xf9
RSP: 0018:ffff880a7d56de20 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00000046241a42b6 RCX: ffff88004d219000
RDX: 000000000000b660 RSI: 0000000000000020 RDI: 0000000000000001
RBP: ffff880a7f052000 R08: 00000046241a42b6 R09: ffffffff807639f0
R10: 00000000ffffffea R11: ffffffff802207f4 R12: ffff880a7f052000
R13: ffff88004d20e460 R14: 0000000000ddd5a6 R15: 0000000000000001
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88004d200000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 000000008005003b
CR2: 0000000000000020 CR3: 0000000a7f1bf000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Process kondemand/0 (pid: 2091, threadinfo ffff880a7d56c000, task
ffff880a7d4d18c0)
Stack:
ffff880a7f052078 ffffffff803efd54 00000046241a42b6 000000462ffa9e95
0000000000000001 0000000000000001 00000000ffffffea ffffffff8064f41a
0000000000000012 0000000000000012 ffff880a7f052000 ffffffff80650547
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff803efd54>] ? kobject_get+0x12/0x17
[<ffffffff8064f41a>] ? __cpufreq_driver_getavg+0x42/0x57
[<ffffffff80650547>] ? do_dbs_timer+0x147/0x272
[<ffffffff80650400>] ? do_dbs_timer+0x0/0x272
[<ffffffff802474ca>] ? worker_thread+0x15b/0x1f5
[<ffffffff8024a02c>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
[<ffffffff8024736f>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x1f5
[<ffffffff80249f0d>] ? kthread+0x54/0x83
[<ffffffff8020c87a>] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
[<ffffffff80249eb9>] ? kthread+0x0/0x83
[<ffffffff8020c870>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
Code: 99 a6 03 00 31 c9 85 c0 0f 85 c3 00 00 00 89 df 4c 8b 44 24 10 48
c7 c2 60 b6 00 00 48 8b 0c fd e0 30 a5 80 4c 89 c3 48 8b 04 0a <48> 2b
58 20 48 8b 44 24 18 48 89 1c 24 48 8b 34 0a 48 2b 46 28
RIP [<ffffffff8021af75>] get_measured_perf+0x4a/0xf9
RSP <ffff880a7d56de20>
CR2: 0000000000000020
---[ end trace 2b8fac9a49e19ad4 ]---
Reported-by: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
index 837c2c4..d722b8d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -68,11 +68,16 @@ struct acpi_cpufreq_data {
unsigned int max_freq;
unsigned int resume;
unsigned int cpu_feature;
- u64 saved_aperf, saved_mperf;
};
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct acpi_cpufreq_data *, drv_data);
+struct acpi_msr_data {
+ u64 saved_aperf, saved_mperf;
+};
+
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct acpi_msr_data, msr_data);
+
DEFINE_TRACE(power_mark);
/* acpi_perf_data is a pointer to percpu data. */
@@ -281,11 +286,11 @@ static unsigned int get_measured_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
return 0;
cur.aperf.whole = readin.aperf.whole -
- per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)->saved_aperf;
+ per_cpu(msr_data, cpu).saved_aperf;
cur.mperf.whole = readin.mperf.whole -
- per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)->saved_mperf;
- per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)->saved_aperf = readin.aperf.whole;
- per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)->saved_mperf = readin.mperf.whole;
+ per_cpu(msr_data, cpu).saved_mperf;
+ per_cpu(msr_data, cpu).saved_aperf = readin.aperf.whole;
+ per_cpu(msr_data, cpu).saved_mperf = readin.mperf.whole;
#ifdef __i386__
/*
--
1.6.0.6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] x86, acpi_cpufreq: Fix the NULL pointer dereference in get_measured_perf
2009-04-15 17:37 ` [PATCH] x86, acpi_cpufreq: Fix the NULL pointer dereference in get_measured_perf Pallipadi, Venkatesh
@ 2009-04-16 1:20 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-04-18 4:11 ` Len Brown
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Zhang, Yanmin @ 2009-04-16 1:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh; +Cc: Rusty Russell, LKML, cpufreq, linux-acpi, lenb
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 10:37 -0700, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> Patch below fixes the problem.
> Yanmin can you please verify.
It does work.
> Len please push this patch along to linus.
>
> Thanks,
> Venki
>
>
> Fix for a regression that was introduced by earlier commit
>
> commit 18b2646fe3babeb40b34a0c1751e0bf5adfdc64c
> Author: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
> Date: Mon Apr 6 11:26:08 2009 -0700
>
> Regression resulted in the below error happened on systems with
> software coordination where per_cpu acpi data will not be initiated for
> secondary CPUs in a P-state domain.
>
> On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 23:01 -0700, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> My machine hanged with kernel 2.6.30-rc2 when script read
> > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor.
> >
> > opps happens in get_measured_perf:
> >
> > cur.aperf.whole = readin.aperf.whole -
> > per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)->saved_aperf;
> >
> > Because per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)=NULL.
> >
> > So function get_measured_perf should check if (per_cpu(drv_data,
> > cpu)==NULL)
> > and return 0 if it's NULL.
>
> --------------sys log------------------
>
> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
> 0000000000000020
> IP: [<ffffffff8021af75>] get_measured_perf+0x4a/0xf9
> PGD a7dd88067 PUD a7ccf5067 PMD 0
> Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
> last sysfs file: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
> CPU 0
> Modules linked in: video output
> Pid: 2091, comm: kondemand/0 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc2 #1 MP Server
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8021af75>] [<ffffffff8021af75>]
> get_measured_perf+0x4a/0xf9
> RSP: 0018:ffff880a7d56de20 EFLAGS: 00010246
> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00000046241a42b6 RCX: ffff88004d219000
> RDX: 000000000000b660 RSI: 0000000000000020 RDI: 0000000000000001
> RBP: ffff880a7f052000 R08: 00000046241a42b6 R09: ffffffff807639f0
> R10: 00000000ffffffea R11: ffffffff802207f4 R12: ffff880a7f052000
> R13: ffff88004d20e460 R14: 0000000000ddd5a6 R15: 0000000000000001
> FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88004d200000(0000)
> knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 000000008005003b
> CR2: 0000000000000020 CR3: 0000000a7f1bf000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Process kondemand/0 (pid: 2091, threadinfo ffff880a7d56c000, task
> ffff880a7d4d18c0)
> Stack:
> ffff880a7f052078 ffffffff803efd54 00000046241a42b6 000000462ffa9e95
> 0000000000000001 0000000000000001 00000000ffffffea ffffffff8064f41a
> 0000000000000012 0000000000000012 ffff880a7f052000 ffffffff80650547
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff803efd54>] ? kobject_get+0x12/0x17
> [<ffffffff8064f41a>] ? __cpufreq_driver_getavg+0x42/0x57
> [<ffffffff80650547>] ? do_dbs_timer+0x147/0x272
> [<ffffffff80650400>] ? do_dbs_timer+0x0/0x272
> [<ffffffff802474ca>] ? worker_thread+0x15b/0x1f5
> [<ffffffff8024a02c>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
> [<ffffffff8024736f>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x1f5
> [<ffffffff80249f0d>] ? kthread+0x54/0x83
> [<ffffffff8020c87a>] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
> [<ffffffff80249eb9>] ? kthread+0x0/0x83
> [<ffffffff8020c870>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
> Code: 99 a6 03 00 31 c9 85 c0 0f 85 c3 00 00 00 89 df 4c 8b 44 24 10 48
> c7 c2 60 b6 00 00 48 8b 0c fd e0 30 a5 80 4c 89 c3 48 8b 04 0a <48> 2b
> 58 20 48 8b 44 24 18 48 89 1c 24 48 8b 34 0a 48 2b 46 28
> RIP [<ffffffff8021af75>] get_measured_perf+0x4a/0xf9
> RSP <ffff880a7d56de20>
> CR2: 0000000000000020
> ---[ end trace 2b8fac9a49e19ad4 ]---
>
> Reported-by: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> index 837c2c4..d722b8d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -68,11 +68,16 @@ struct acpi_cpufreq_data {
> unsigned int max_freq;
> unsigned int resume;
> unsigned int cpu_feature;
> - u64 saved_aperf, saved_mperf;
> };
>
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct acpi_cpufreq_data *, drv_data);
>
> +struct acpi_msr_data {
> + u64 saved_aperf, saved_mperf;
> +};
> +
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct acpi_msr_data, msr_data);
> +
> DEFINE_TRACE(power_mark);
>
> /* acpi_perf_data is a pointer to percpu data. */
> @@ -281,11 +286,11 @@ static unsigned int get_measured_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> return 0;
>
> cur.aperf.whole = readin.aperf.whole -
> - per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)->saved_aperf;
> + per_cpu(msr_data, cpu).saved_aperf;
> cur.mperf.whole = readin.mperf.whole -
> - per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)->saved_mperf;
> - per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)->saved_aperf = readin.aperf.whole;
> - per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)->saved_mperf = readin.mperf.whole;
> + per_cpu(msr_data, cpu).saved_mperf;
> + per_cpu(msr_data, cpu).saved_aperf = readin.aperf.whole;
> + per_cpu(msr_data, cpu).saved_mperf = readin.mperf.whole;
>
> #ifdef __i386__
> /*
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] x86, acpi_cpufreq: Fix the NULL pointer dereference in get_measured_perf
2009-04-15 17:37 ` [PATCH] x86, acpi_cpufreq: Fix the NULL pointer dereference in get_measured_perf Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-04-16 1:20 ` Zhang, Yanmin
@ 2009-04-18 4:11 ` Len Brown
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Len Brown @ 2009-04-18 4:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Cc: Zhang, Yanmin, Rusty Russell, LKML, cpufreq, linux-acpi
applied.
thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-04-18 4:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-04-15 6:01 2.6.30-rc2 hangs in get_measured_perf on tigerton Zhang, Yanmin
2009-04-15 6:49 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-04-15 11:14 ` Rusty Russell
2009-04-15 11:14 ` Rusty Russell
2009-04-15 13:31 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-04-15 13:31 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
[not found] ` <B5B0CFF685D7DF46A05CF1678CFB42ED20E09E32@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
2009-04-15 17:37 ` [PATCH] x86, acpi_cpufreq: Fix the NULL pointer dereference in get_measured_perf Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-04-16 1:20 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-04-18 4:11 ` Len Brown
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.