All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* 32bit variables on >2T arrays
@ 2009-05-03 14:13 Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
  2009-05-03 14:27 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
  2009-05-04  7:01 ` NeilBrown
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe @ 2009-05-03 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-raid

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 580 bytes --]

Hello again :)

there seems to be another (minor) 32bit-issue...

md7 : active raid10 sdh1[5] sdg1[3] sdf1[1] sdc1[0] sde1[4] sdd1[2]
      4395406848 blocks 512K chunks 2 near-copies [6/6] [UUUUUU]
      [>....................]  check =  0.6% (28034560/4395406848) finish=4.7min speed=254624K/sec
      bitmap: 0/131 pages [0KB], 16384KB chunk

the time-to-finish calculation seems to be quite optimistic :)


Mario
-- 
What I need is an exact list of specific unknown problems we might encounter.
                                -- Manager, Lykes Lines Shipping

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 481 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: 32bit variables on >2T arrays
  2009-05-03 14:13 32bit variables on >2T arrays Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
@ 2009-05-03 14:27 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
  2009-05-04  7:01 ` NeilBrown
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe @ 2009-05-03 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-raid

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 603 bytes --]

On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 04:13:00PM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> there seems to be another (minor) 32bit-issue...
>       [>....................]  check =  0.6% (28034560/4395406848) finish=4.7min speed=254624K/sec

A little later it normalizes...

      [=>...................]  check =  6.1% (269385216/4395406848) finish=266.0min speed=258429K/sec

seems like it broke the 32bit barrier :)
4395406848 - 269385216 < 2^32


Mario
-- 
"Why are we hiding from the police, daddy?"      | J. E. Guenther
"Because we use SuSE son, they use SYSVR4."      | de.alt.sysadmin.recovery

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 481 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: 32bit variables on >2T arrays
  2009-05-03 14:13 32bit variables on >2T arrays Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
  2009-05-03 14:27 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
@ 2009-05-04  7:01 ` NeilBrown
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: NeilBrown @ 2009-05-04  7:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe, linux-raid

On Mon, May 4, 2009 12:13 am, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> Hello again :)
>
> there seems to be another (minor) 32bit-issue...
>
> md7 : active raid10 sdh1[5] sdg1[3] sdf1[1] sdc1[0] sde1[4] sdd1[2]
>       4395406848 blocks 512K chunks 2 near-copies [6/6] [UUUUUU]
>       [>....................]  check =  0.6% (28034560/4395406848)
> finish=4.7min speed=254624K/sec
>       bitmap: 0/131 pages [0KB], 16384KB chunk
>
> the time-to-finish calculation seems to be quite optimistic :)

Thanks.

I've just posted as series of patches which includes a fix for
this as well as the other issues you identified.

Thanks for helping to improve md!

NeilBrown


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-05-04  7:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-05-03 14:13 32bit variables on >2T arrays Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2009-05-03 14:27 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2009-05-04  7:01 ` NeilBrown

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.