* 32bit variables on >2T arrays
@ 2009-05-03 14:13 Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2009-05-03 14:27 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2009-05-04 7:01 ` NeilBrown
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe @ 2009-05-03 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 580 bytes --]
Hello again :)
there seems to be another (minor) 32bit-issue...
md7 : active raid10 sdh1[5] sdg1[3] sdf1[1] sdc1[0] sde1[4] sdd1[2]
4395406848 blocks 512K chunks 2 near-copies [6/6] [UUUUUU]
[>....................] check = 0.6% (28034560/4395406848) finish=4.7min speed=254624K/sec
bitmap: 0/131 pages [0KB], 16384KB chunk
the time-to-finish calculation seems to be quite optimistic :)
Mario
--
What I need is an exact list of specific unknown problems we might encounter.
-- Manager, Lykes Lines Shipping
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 481 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: 32bit variables on >2T arrays
2009-05-03 14:13 32bit variables on >2T arrays Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
@ 2009-05-03 14:27 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2009-05-04 7:01 ` NeilBrown
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe @ 2009-05-03 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 603 bytes --]
On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 04:13:00PM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> there seems to be another (minor) 32bit-issue...
> [>....................] check = 0.6% (28034560/4395406848) finish=4.7min speed=254624K/sec
A little later it normalizes...
[=>...................] check = 6.1% (269385216/4395406848) finish=266.0min speed=258429K/sec
seems like it broke the 32bit barrier :)
4395406848 - 269385216 < 2^32
Mario
--
"Why are we hiding from the police, daddy?" | J. E. Guenther
"Because we use SuSE son, they use SYSVR4." | de.alt.sysadmin.recovery
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 481 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: 32bit variables on >2T arrays
2009-05-03 14:13 32bit variables on >2T arrays Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2009-05-03 14:27 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
@ 2009-05-04 7:01 ` NeilBrown
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: NeilBrown @ 2009-05-04 7:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe, linux-raid
On Mon, May 4, 2009 12:13 am, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> Hello again :)
>
> there seems to be another (minor) 32bit-issue...
>
> md7 : active raid10 sdh1[5] sdg1[3] sdf1[1] sdc1[0] sde1[4] sdd1[2]
> 4395406848 blocks 512K chunks 2 near-copies [6/6] [UUUUUU]
> [>....................] check = 0.6% (28034560/4395406848)
> finish=4.7min speed=254624K/sec
> bitmap: 0/131 pages [0KB], 16384KB chunk
>
> the time-to-finish calculation seems to be quite optimistic :)
Thanks.
I've just posted as series of patches which includes a fix for
this as well as the other issues you identified.
Thanks for helping to improve md!
NeilBrown
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-05-04 7:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-05-03 14:13 32bit variables on >2T arrays Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2009-05-03 14:27 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2009-05-04 7:01 ` NeilBrown
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.