* [PATCH 1/1] cr: move CKPT_ARCH_NSIG to asm/signal.h
@ 2009-06-26 15:30 Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20090626153012.GA23103-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Serge E. Hallyn @ 2009-06-26 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oren Laadan; +Cc: Linux Containers
I dunno... does this seem worth a shot? Or should I just go ahead
and #define CKPT_ARCH_NSIG in arch/s390/include/asm/checkpoint_hdr.h
after all?
From c128ce9ebc0bea5801f90ba99a58fcc18b7df84f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Serge E. Hallyn <serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:59:17 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] cr: move CKPT_ARCH_NSIG to asm/signal.h
Just a thought... if the signal code changes we don't want
the checkpoint code getting out of sync. But putting it where
it really belongs - asm/sigcontext.h - doesn't work bc that's
under ifdef __KERNEL__. So does this seem like a reasonable thing
to do?
Also define the value for s390.
Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
---
arch/s390/include/asm/signal.h | 2 ++
arch/x86/include/asm/checkpoint_hdr.h | 2 --
arch/x86/include/asm/signal.h | 1 +
include/linux/checkpoint_hdr.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/signal.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/signal.h
index f6cfddb..bcd7afa 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/signal.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/signal.h
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ typedef unsigned long sigset_t;
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
+#define CKPT_ARCH_NSIG 64
+
#define SIGHUP 1
#define SIGINT 2
#define SIGQUIT 3
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/checkpoint_hdr.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/checkpoint_hdr.h
index 745038b..16485ca 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/checkpoint_hdr.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/checkpoint_hdr.h
@@ -44,8 +44,6 @@ enum {
CKPT_HDR_MM_CONTEXT_LDT,
};
-#define CKPT_ARCH_NSIG 64
-
struct ckpt_hdr_header_arch {
struct ckpt_hdr h;
/* FIXME: add HAVE_HWFP */
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/signal.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/signal.h
index 7761a5d..de9147d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/signal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/signal.h
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ typedef unsigned long sigset_t;
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
+#define CKPT_ARCH_NSIG 64
#define SIGHUP 1
#define SIGINT 2
#define SIGQUIT 3
diff --git a/include/linux/checkpoint_hdr.h b/include/linux/checkpoint_hdr.h
index 37bae3d..7d16664 100644
--- a/include/linux/checkpoint_hdr.h
+++ b/include/linux/checkpoint_hdr.h
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/utsname.h>
+#include <asm/signal.h> /* for CKPT_ARCH_NSIG */
/*
* To maintain compatibility between 32-bit and 64-bit architecture flavors,
--
1.6.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] cr: move CKPT_ARCH_NSIG to asm/signal.h
[not found] ` <20090626153012.GA23103-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-26 16:02 ` Oren Laadan
[not found] ` <4A44F11B.20803-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Oren Laadan @ 2009-06-26 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Serge E. Hallyn; +Cc: Linux Containers
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> I dunno... does this seem worth a shot? Or should I just go ahead
> and #define CKPT_ARCH_NSIG in arch/s390/include/asm/checkpoint_hdr.h
> after all?
How about leaving definition in checkpoint_hdr.h, and adding
somewhere a compile bug (under __KERNEL__) if there is a
mismatch, i.e. if CKPT_ARCH_NSIG != _NSIG ?
Oren.
>
> From c128ce9ebc0bea5801f90ba99a58fcc18b7df84f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Serge E. Hallyn <serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:59:17 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] cr: move CKPT_ARCH_NSIG to asm/signal.h
>
> Just a thought... if the signal code changes we don't want
> the checkpoint code getting out of sync. But putting it where
> it really belongs - asm/sigcontext.h - doesn't work bc that's
> under ifdef __KERNEL__. So does this seem like a reasonable thing
> to do?
>
> Also define the value for s390.
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> arch/s390/include/asm/signal.h | 2 ++
> arch/x86/include/asm/checkpoint_hdr.h | 2 --
> arch/x86/include/asm/signal.h | 1 +
> include/linux/checkpoint_hdr.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/signal.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/signal.h
> index f6cfddb..bcd7afa 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/signal.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/signal.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ typedef unsigned long sigset_t;
>
> #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
>
> +#define CKPT_ARCH_NSIG 64
> +
> #define SIGHUP 1
> #define SIGINT 2
> #define SIGQUIT 3
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/checkpoint_hdr.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/checkpoint_hdr.h
> index 745038b..16485ca 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/checkpoint_hdr.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/checkpoint_hdr.h
> @@ -44,8 +44,6 @@ enum {
> CKPT_HDR_MM_CONTEXT_LDT,
> };
>
> -#define CKPT_ARCH_NSIG 64
> -
> struct ckpt_hdr_header_arch {
> struct ckpt_hdr h;
> /* FIXME: add HAVE_HWFP */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/signal.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/signal.h
> index 7761a5d..de9147d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/signal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/signal.h
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ typedef unsigned long sigset_t;
> #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>
> +#define CKPT_ARCH_NSIG 64
> #define SIGHUP 1
> #define SIGINT 2
> #define SIGQUIT 3
> diff --git a/include/linux/checkpoint_hdr.h b/include/linux/checkpoint_hdr.h
> index 37bae3d..7d16664 100644
> --- a/include/linux/checkpoint_hdr.h
> +++ b/include/linux/checkpoint_hdr.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> #include <linux/utsname.h>
> +#include <asm/signal.h> /* for CKPT_ARCH_NSIG */
>
> /*
> * To maintain compatibility between 32-bit and 64-bit architecture flavors,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] cr: move CKPT_ARCH_NSIG to asm/signal.h
[not found] ` <4A44F11B.20803-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-26 16:27 ` Serge E. Hallyn
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Serge E. Hallyn @ 2009-06-26 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oren Laadan; +Cc: Linux Containers
Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org):
>
>
> Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > I dunno... does this seem worth a shot? Or should I just go ahead
> > and #define CKPT_ARCH_NSIG in arch/s390/include/asm/checkpoint_hdr.h
> > after all?
>
> How about leaving definition in checkpoint_hdr.h, and adding
> somewhere a compile bug (under __KERNEL__) if there is a
> mismatch, i.e. if CKPT_ARCH_NSIG != _NSIG ?
Yeah that sounds better.
thanks,
-serge
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-06-26 16:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-06-26 15:30 [PATCH 1/1] cr: move CKPT_ARCH_NSIG to asm/signal.h Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20090626153012.GA23103-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-26 16:02 ` Oren Laadan
[not found] ` <4A44F11B.20803-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-26 16:27 ` Serge E. Hallyn
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.