* 2.6.31-rc2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 @ 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-06 23:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2009-07-07 138 50 46 2009-06-29 133 46 43 2009-06-07 110 35 31 2009-05-31 100 32 27 2009-05-24 92 34 27 2009-05-16 81 36 33 2009-04-25 55 36 26 2009-04-17 37 35 28 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13694 Subject : i915 phantom TV Submitter : Maciek Józiewicz <mjoziew@gmail.com> Date : 2009-07-02 12:26 (5 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13682 Subject : The webcam stopped working when upgrading from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30 Submitter : Nathanael Schaeffer <nathanael.schaeffer@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-30 13:34 (7 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13681 Subject : A number of usb Devices causes Oops messages and kernel panics. Submitter : Alexander Kaltsas <alexkaltsas@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-30 13:06 (7 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13669 Subject : Kernel bug with dock driver Submitter : Joerg Platte <jplatte@naasa.net> Date : 2009-06-14 21:00 (23 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/14/216 Handled-By : Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13668 Subject : Can't boot 2.6.30 powerpc kernel under qemu. Submitter : Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> Date : 2009-06-27 18:08 (10 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/159 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13660 Subject : Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs Submitter : Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-27 16:07 (10 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/95 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13651 Subject : Anyone know what happened with PC speaker in 2.6.30? Submitter : Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> Date : 2009-06-15 14:41 (22 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124507695427817&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13648 Subject : nfsd: page allocation failure Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com> Date : 2009-06-22 12:08 (15 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/22/309 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13647 Subject : fb/mmap lockdep report. Submitter : Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Date : 2009-06-21 13:33 (16 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=513adb58685615b0b1d47a3f0d40f5352beff189 References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/90 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/122 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13646 Subject : warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2009-06-19 17:05 (18 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/19/187 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13644 Subject : hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net> Date : 2009-06-16 01:27 (21 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/15/630 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/504 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13638 Subject : rt2870 driver is broken for (some) cards Submitter : jakob gruber <jakob.gruber@kabelnet.at> Date : 2009-06-27 17:33 (10 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13634 Subject : [drm:drm_wait_vblank] *ERROR* failed to acquire vblank counter, -22 Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz> Date : 2009-06-27 07:02 (10 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13624 Subject : usb: wrong autosuspend initialization Submitter : <list@phuk.ath.cx> Date : 2009-06-25 18:18 (12 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13621 Subject : xfs hangs with assertion failed Submitter : Johannes Engel <jcnengel@googlemail.com> Date : 2009-06-25 10:07 (12 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13620 Subject : acpi_enforce_resources broken - conflicting i2c module loaded on some EeePCs Submitter : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk> Date : 2009-06-25 08:31 (12 days old) References : <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-eeepc-devel/2009-June/002316.html> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13583 Subject : pdflush uses 5% CPU on otherwise idle system Submitter : Paul Martin <pm@debian.org> Date : 2009-06-19 13:33 (18 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13581 Subject : ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels Submitter : Matteo <rootkit85@yahoo.it> Date : 2009-06-19 12:04 (18 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13564 Subject : random general protection fault at boot time caused by khubd. Submitter : Pauli <suokkos@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-18 12:44 (19 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13558 Subject : Tracelog during resume Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz> Date : 2009-06-17 11:32 (20 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13554 Subject : linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window Submitter : Jos van Wolput <wolput@onsneteindhoven.nl> Date : 2009-06-17 06:28 (20 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13518 Subject : slab grows with NFS write activity. Submitter : Andrew Randrianasulu <randrik@mail.ru> Date : 2009-06-12 09:51 (25 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13514 Subject : acer_wmi causes stack corruption Submitter : Rus <harbour@sfinx.od.ua> Date : 2009-06-12 08:13 (25 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13512 Subject : D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore Submitter : Daniel Smolik <marvin@mydatex.cz> Date : 2009-06-11 20:12 (26 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13502 Subject : GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1 Submitter : <sveina@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-10 20:04 (27 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13472 Subject : Oops with minicom and USB serial Submitter : Peter Chubb <peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au> Date : 2009-06-05 1:37 (32 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124416901026700&w=4 Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13471 Subject : Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled Submitter : Ozan Çağlayan <ozan@pardus.org.tr> Date : 2009-06-04 9:12 (33 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124410667532558&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13424 Subject : possible deadlock when doing governor switching Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Date : 2009-05-31 16:36 (37 days old) References : http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg00711.html http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/28/405 Handled-By : Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13408 Subject : Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7 Submitter : Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com> Date : 2009-05-30 18:51 (38 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/30/146 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13407 Subject : adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram Submitter : Jan Scholz <scholz@fias.uni-frankfurt.de> Date : 2009-05-28 7:59 (40 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ed8d2b3a81bdbb0418301628ccdb008ac9f40b7 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124349762314976&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13401 Subject : pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected) Submitter : Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@free.fr> Date : 2009-05-28 18:43 (40 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13374 Subject : reiserfs blocked for more than 120secs Submitter : Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@t-online.de> Date : 2009-05-23 8:52 (45 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124306880410811&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/29/389 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13373 Subject : fbcon, intelfb, i915: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> Date : 2009-05-23 5:08 (45 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124305538130702&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362 Subject : rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap Submitter : Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com> Date : 2009-05-22 13:32 (46 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13351 Subject : 2.6.30 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk Submitter : <unggnu@googlemail.com> Date : 2009-05-20 14:09 (48 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=78a8b35bc7abf8b8333d6f625e08c0f7cc1c3742 Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13341 Subject : Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules Submitter : <patrick@ostenberg.de> Date : 2009-05-19 09:08 (49 days old) Handled-By : Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13337 Subject : [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules Submitter : Tomas Janousek <tomi@nomi.cz> Date : 2009-05-18 10:59 (50 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13328 Subject : b44: eth0: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 00000002 of register 42c to clear. Submitter : Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com> Date : 2009-05-03 16:22 (65 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124136778012280&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319 Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (69 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136 Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13318 Subject : AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2 Submitter : Karsten Mehrhoff <kawime@gmx.de> Date : 2009-04-30 8:51 (68 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=59de2bebabc5027f93df999d59cc65df591c3e6e References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124108156417560&w=4 Handled-By : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13306 Subject : hibernate slow on _second_ run Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Date : 2009-05-14 09:34 (54 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13277 Subject : 2.6.30 regression - hang on 2nd resume - bisected - Thinkpad X40 Submitter : Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Date : 2009-05-11 10:08 (57 days old) Handled-By : Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13219 Subject : Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.4 Submitter : David Hill <hilld@binarystorm.net> Date : 2009-05-01 16:57 (67 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13179 Subject : CD-R: wodim intermittent failures Submitter : Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org> Date : 2009-04-21 1:52 (77 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124027879214231&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13119 Subject : Trouble with make-install from a NFS mount Submitter : Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Date : 2009-04-14 21:32 (84 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123974482327044&w=4 Handled-By : H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13109 Subject : High latency on /sys/class/thermal Submitter : Tiago Simões Batista <tiagosbatista@gmail.com> Date : 2009-04-11 14:56 (87 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123946182301248&w=4 Handled-By : Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13663 Subject : suspend to ram regression (IDE related) Submitter : Etienne Basset <etienne.basset@numericable.fr> Date : 2009-06-26 17:40 (11 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/26/242 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/126 Handled-By : Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/32719/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13649 Subject : Bad page state in process with various applications Submitter : Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-20 15:27 (17 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=124551168828090&w=4 Handled-By : Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/33130/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13475 Subject : suspend/hibernate lockdep warning Submitter : Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-02 10:00 (35 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124393723321241&w=4 Handled-By : Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/28660/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389 Subject : Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2009-05-26 15:24 (42 days old) Handled-By : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672 For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13070 Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* 2.6.31-rc2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 @ 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-06 23:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: DRI, Linux SCSI List, Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Natalie Protasevich, Linux ACPI, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds, Linux PM List This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2009-07-07 138 50 46 2009-06-29 133 46 43 2009-06-07 110 35 31 2009-05-31 100 32 27 2009-05-24 92 34 27 2009-05-16 81 36 33 2009-04-25 55 36 26 2009-04-17 37 35 28 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13694 Subject : i915 phantom TV Submitter : Maciek Józiewicz <mjoziew@gmail.com> Date : 2009-07-02 12:26 (5 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13682 Subject : The webcam stopped working when upgrading from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30 Submitter : Nathanael Schaeffer <nathanael.schaeffer@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-30 13:34 (7 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13681 Subject : A number of usb Devices causes Oops messages and kernel panics. Submitter : Alexander Kaltsas <alexkaltsas@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-30 13:06 (7 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13669 Subject : Kernel bug with dock driver Submitter : Joerg Platte <jplatte@naasa.net> Date : 2009-06-14 21:00 (23 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/14/216 Handled-By : Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13668 Subject : Can't boot 2.6.30 powerpc kernel under qemu. Submitter : Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> Date : 2009-06-27 18:08 (10 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/159 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13660 Subject : Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs Submitter : Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-27 16:07 (10 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/95 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13651 Subject : Anyone know what happened with PC speaker in 2.6.30? Submitter : Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> Date : 2009-06-15 14:41 (22 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124507695427817&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13648 Subject : nfsd: page allocation failure Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com> Date : 2009-06-22 12:08 (15 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/22/309 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13647 Subject : fb/mmap lockdep report. Submitter : Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Date : 2009-06-21 13:33 (16 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=513adb58685615b0b1d47a3f0d40f5352beff189 References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/90 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/122 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13646 Subject : warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2009-06-19 17:05 (18 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/19/187 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13644 Subject : hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net> Date : 2009-06-16 01:27 (21 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/15/630 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/504 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13638 Subject : rt2870 driver is broken for (some) cards Submitter : jakob gruber <jakob.gruber@kabelnet.at> Date : 2009-06-27 17:33 (10 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13634 Subject : [drm:drm_wait_vblank] *ERROR* failed to acquire vblank counter, -22 Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz> Date : 2009-06-27 07:02 (10 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13624 Subject : usb: wrong autosuspend initialization Submitter : <list@phuk.ath.cx> Date : 2009-06-25 18:18 (12 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13621 Subject : xfs hangs with assertion failed Submitter : Johannes Engel <jcnengel@googlemail.com> Date : 2009-06-25 10:07 (12 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13620 Subject : acpi_enforce_resources broken - conflicting i2c module loaded on some EeePCs Submitter : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk> Date : 2009-06-25 08:31 (12 days old) References : <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-eeepc-devel/2009-June/002316.html> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13583 Subject : pdflush uses 5% CPU on otherwise idle system Submitter : Paul Martin <pm@debian.org> Date : 2009-06-19 13:33 (18 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13581 Subject : ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels Submitter : Matteo <rootkit85@yahoo.it> Date : 2009-06-19 12:04 (18 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13564 Subject : random general protection fault at boot time caused by khubd. Submitter : Pauli <suokkos@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-18 12:44 (19 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13558 Subject : Tracelog during resume Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz> Date : 2009-06-17 11:32 (20 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13554 Subject : linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window Submitter : Jos van Wolput <wolput@onsneteindhoven.nl> Date : 2009-06-17 06:28 (20 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13518 Subject : slab grows with NFS write activity. Submitter : Andrew Randrianasulu <randrik@mail.ru> Date : 2009-06-12 09:51 (25 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13514 Subject : acer_wmi causes stack corruption Submitter : Rus <harbour@sfinx.od.ua> Date : 2009-06-12 08:13 (25 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13512 Subject : D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore Submitter : Daniel Smolik <marvin@mydatex.cz> Date : 2009-06-11 20:12 (26 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13502 Subject : GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1 Submitter : <sveina@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-10 20:04 (27 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13472 Subject : Oops with minicom and USB serial Submitter : Peter Chubb <peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au> Date : 2009-06-05 1:37 (32 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124416901026700&w=4 Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13471 Subject : Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled Submitter : Ozan Çağlayan <ozan@pardus.org.tr> Date : 2009-06-04 9:12 (33 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124410667532558&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13424 Subject : possible deadlock when doing governor switching Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Date : 2009-05-31 16:36 (37 days old) References : http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg00711.html http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/28/405 Handled-By : Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13408 Subject : Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7 Submitter : Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com> Date : 2009-05-30 18:51 (38 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/30/146 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13407 Subject : adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram Submitter : Jan Scholz <scholz@fias.uni-frankfurt.de> Date : 2009-05-28 7:59 (40 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ed8d2b3a81bdbb0418301628ccdb008ac9f40b7 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124349762314976&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13401 Subject : pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected) Submitter : Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@free.fr> Date : 2009-05-28 18:43 (40 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13374 Subject : reiserfs blocked for more than 120secs Submitter : Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@t-online.de> Date : 2009-05-23 8:52 (45 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124306880410811&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/29/389 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13373 Subject : fbcon, intelfb, i915: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> Date : 2009-05-23 5:08 (45 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124305538130702&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362 Subject : rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap Submitter : Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com> Date : 2009-05-22 13:32 (46 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13351 Subject : 2.6.30 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk Submitter : <unggnu@googlemail.com> Date : 2009-05-20 14:09 (48 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=78a8b35bc7abf8b8333d6f625e08c0f7cc1c3742 Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13341 Subject : Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules Submitter : <patrick@ostenberg.de> Date : 2009-05-19 09:08 (49 days old) Handled-By : Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13337 Subject : [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules Submitter : Tomas Janousek <tomi@nomi.cz> Date : 2009-05-18 10:59 (50 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13328 Subject : b44: eth0: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 00000002 of register 42c to clear. Submitter : Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com> Date : 2009-05-03 16:22 (65 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124136778012280&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319 Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (69 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136 Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13318 Subject : AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2 Submitter : Karsten Mehrhoff <kawime@gmx.de> Date : 2009-04-30 8:51 (68 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=59de2bebabc5027f93df999d59cc65df591c3e6e References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124108156417560&w=4 Handled-By : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13306 Subject : hibernate slow on _second_ run Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Date : 2009-05-14 09:34 (54 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13277 Subject : 2.6.30 regression - hang on 2nd resume - bisected - Thinkpad X40 Submitter : Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Date : 2009-05-11 10:08 (57 days old) Handled-By : Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13219 Subject : Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.4 Submitter : David Hill <hilld@binarystorm.net> Date : 2009-05-01 16:57 (67 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13179 Subject : CD-R: wodim intermittent failures Submitter : Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org> Date : 2009-04-21 1:52 (77 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124027879214231&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13119 Subject : Trouble with make-install from a NFS mount Submitter : Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Date : 2009-04-14 21:32 (84 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123974482327044&w=4 Handled-By : H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13109 Subject : High latency on /sys/class/thermal Submitter : Tiago Simões Batista <tiagosbatista@gmail.com> Date : 2009-04-11 14:56 (87 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123946182301248&w=4 Handled-By : Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13663 Subject : suspend to ram regression (IDE related) Submitter : Etienne Basset <etienne.basset@numericable.fr> Date : 2009-06-26 17:40 (11 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/26/242 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/126 Handled-By : Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/32719/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13649 Subject : Bad page state in process with various applications Submitter : Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-20 15:27 (17 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=124551168828090&w=4 Handled-By : Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/33130/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13475 Subject : suspend/hibernate lockdep warning Submitter : Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-02 10:00 (35 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124393723321241&w=4 Handled-By : Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/28660/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389 Subject : Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2009-05-26 15:24 (42 days old) Handled-By : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672 For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13070 Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks, Rafael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/blackberry -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13109] High latency on /sys/class/thermal 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-06 23:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexey Starikovskiy, Tiago Simões Batista, Zhang Rui This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13109 Subject : High latency on /sys/class/thermal Submitter : Tiago Simões Batista <tiagosbatista@gmail.com> Date : 2009-04-11 14:56 (87 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123946182301248&w=4 Handled-By : Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13109] High latency on /sys/class/thermal @ 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-06 23:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexey Starikovskiy, Tiago Simões Batista, Zhang Rui This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13109 Subject : High latency on /sys/class/thermal Submitter : Tiago Sim√µes Batista <tiagosbatista@gmail.com> Date : 2009-04-11 14:56 (87 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123946182301248&w=4 Handled-By : Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13277] 2.6.30 regression - hang on 2nd resume - bisected - Thinkpad X40 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Daniel Vetter, Len Brown This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13277 Subject : 2.6.30 regression - hang on 2nd resume - bisected - Thinkpad X40 Submitter : Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Date : 2009-05-11 10:08 (57 days old) Handled-By : Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13277] 2.6.30 regression - hang on 2nd resume - bisected - Thinkpad X40 @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Daniel Vetter, Len Brown This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13277 Subject : 2.6.30 regression - hang on 2nd resume - bisected - Thinkpad X40 Submitter : Daniel Vetter <daniel-/w4YWyX8dFk@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-05-11 10:08 (57 days old) Handled-By : Len Brown <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13119] Trouble with make-install from a NFS mount 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Gregory Haskins, H. Peter Anvin, Sam Ravnborg This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13119 Subject : Trouble with make-install from a NFS mount Submitter : Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Date : 2009-04-14 21:32 (84 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123974482327044&w=4 Handled-By : H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13119] Trouble with make-install from a NFS mount @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Gregory Haskins, H. Peter Anvin, Sam Ravnborg This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13119 Subject : Trouble with make-install from a NFS mount Submitter : Gregory Haskins <ghaskins-Et1tbQHTxzrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-04-14 21:32 (84 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123974482327044&w=4 Handled-By : H. Peter Anvin <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13179] CD-R: wodim intermittent failures 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andy Isaacson, Joerg Schilling, Robert Hancock This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13179 Subject : CD-R: wodim intermittent failures Submitter : Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org> Date : 2009-04-21 1:52 (77 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124027879214231&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13179] CD-R: wodim intermittent failures @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andy Isaacson, Joerg Schilling, Robert Hancock This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13179 Subject : CD-R: wodim intermittent failures Submitter : Andy Isaacson <adi-3HqRAUrWAWyGglJvpFV4uA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-04-21 1:52 (77 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124027879214231&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13219] Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.4 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, David Hill This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13219 Subject : Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.4 Submitter : David Hill <hilld@binarystorm.net> Date : 2009-05-01 16:57 (67 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13219] Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.4 @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, David Hill This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13219 Subject : Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.4 Submitter : David Hill <hilld-HTiBYHdybX7UkGsOFmftXw@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-05-01 16:57 (67 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13306] hibernate slow on _second_ run 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13306 Subject : hibernate slow on _second_ run Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Date : 2009-05-14 09:34 (54 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13306] hibernate slow on _second_ run @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13306 Subject : hibernate slow on _second_ run Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-05-14 09:34 (54 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13306] hibernate slow on _second_ run 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:12 ` Johannes Berg -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Johannes Berg @ 2009-07-07 0:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 636 bytes --] On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 02:00 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13306 > Subject : hibernate slow on _second_ run > Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> > Date : 2009-05-14 09:34 (54 days old) Still exists in 31-rc2. johannes [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13306] hibernate slow on _second_ run @ 2009-07-07 0:12 ` Johannes Berg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Johannes Berg @ 2009-07-07 0:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 659 bytes --] On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 02:00 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13306 > Subject : hibernate slow on _second_ run > Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2009-05-14 09:34 (54 days old) Still exists in 31-rc2. johannes [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13306] hibernate slow on _second_ run @ 2009-07-07 10:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Johannes Berg; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 02:00 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13306 > > Subject : hibernate slow on _second_ run > > Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> > > Date : 2009-05-14 09:34 (54 days old) > > Still exists in 31-rc2. Thanks for the update. Last time I remember you managed to collect some ftrace output from the failing case, but they didn't reveal anything directly. We know, however, that is [suspend|resume]_device_irqs() in driver/base/power/main.c are disabled, the issue doesn't show up. Is that correct? Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13306] hibernate slow on _second_ run @ 2009-07-07 10:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Johannes Berg; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 02:00 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13306 > > Subject : hibernate slow on _second_ run > > Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2009-05-14 09:34 (54 days old) > > Still exists in 31-rc2. Thanks for the update. Last time I remember you managed to collect some ftrace output from the failing case, but they didn't reveal anything directly. We know, however, that is [suspend|resume]_device_irqs() in driver/base/power/main.c are disabled, the issue doesn't show up. Is that correct? Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13306] hibernate slow on _second_ run 2009-07-07 10:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (?) @ 2009-07-07 11:27 ` Johannes Berg -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Johannes Berg @ 2009-07-07 11:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 539 bytes --] On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 12:58 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Thanks for the update. > > Last time I remember you managed to collect some ftrace output from the failing > case, but they didn't reveal anything directly. > > We know, however, that is [suspend|resume]_device_irqs() in > driver/base/power/main.c are disabled, the issue doesn't show up. > > Is that correct? I'm not sure -- did we verify that somehow? I was running with some trial patch from you for a long time but it had no apparent effect. johannes [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, Larry Finger This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319 Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (69 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136 Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, Larry Finger This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319 Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (69 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136 Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 1:05 ` Larry Finger -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Larry Finger @ 2009-07-07 1:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319 > Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> > Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (69 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4 > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136 > Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> I have not seen the fix yet, but one is being prepared. I think the bug can be closed. Larry ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb @ 2009-07-07 1:05 ` Larry Finger 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Larry Finger @ 2009-07-07 1:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319 > Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (69 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4 > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136 > Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org> I have not seen the fix yet, but one is being prepared. I think the bug can be closed. Larry ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb @ 2009-07-07 6:29 ` David Rientjes 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: David Rientjes @ 2009-07-07 6:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Larry Finger Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, Pekka Enberg On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, Larry Finger wrote: > I have not seen the fix yet, but one is being prepared. I think the > bug can be closed. > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/34385 should fix your issue (try with CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON still enabled and slub_debug=O on the command line). Pekka indicated he wanted this fixed in 2.6.31, so he'll probably push it to Linus before the 2.6.31-rc3. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb @ 2009-07-07 6:29 ` David Rientjes 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: David Rientjes @ 2009-07-07 6:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Larry Finger Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, Pekka Enberg On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, Larry Finger wrote: > I have not seen the fix yet, but one is being prepared. I think the > bug can be closed. > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/34385 should fix your issue (try with CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON still enabled and slub_debug=O on the command line). Pekka indicated he wanted this fixed in 2.6.31, so he'll probably push it to Linus before the 2.6.31-rc3. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb @ 2009-07-07 6:57 ` Pekka Enberg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-07-07 6:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Rientjes Cc: Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg Hi, On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, Larry Finger wrote: >> I have not seen the fix yet, but one is being prepared. I think the >> bug can be closed. On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 9:29 AM, David Rientjes<rientjes@google.com> wrote: > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/34385 should fix your issue (try with > CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON still enabled and slub_debug=O on the command line). > > Pekka indicated he wanted this fixed in 2.6.31, so he'll probably push it > to Linus before the 2.6.31-rc3. Yup, if it's not too much trouble Larry, I'd appreciate if you gave it a spin before I apply the sucker. Note to regression trackers, I don't think this should go to -stable because it depends on other patches in mainline and there's an obvious workaround for the problem (disable CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON). Furthermore, it's very unlikely people will hit this on production configurations anyway. Pekka ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb @ 2009-07-07 6:57 ` Pekka Enberg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-07-07 6:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Rientjes Cc: Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg Hi, On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, Larry Finger wrote: >> I have not seen the fix yet, but one is being prepared. I think the >> bug can be closed. On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 9:29 AM, David Rientjes<rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote: > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/34385 should fix your issue (try with > CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON still enabled and slub_debug=O on the command line). > > Pekka indicated he wanted this fixed in 2.6.31, so he'll probably push it > to Linus before the 2.6.31-rc3. Yup, if it's not too much trouble Larry, I'd appreciate if you gave it a spin before I apply the sucker. Note to regression trackers, I don't think this should go to -stable because it depends on other patches in mainline and there's an obvious workaround for the problem (disable CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON). Furthermore, it's very unlikely people will hit this on production configurations anyway. Pekka ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb @ 2009-07-08 13:18 ` Larry Finger 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Larry Finger @ 2009-07-08 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pekka Enberg Cc: David Rientjes, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg Pekka Enberg wrote: > > Yup, if it's not too much trouble Larry, I'd appreciate if you gave it > a spin before I apply the sucker. Note to regression trackers, I don't > think this should go to -stable because it depends on other patches in > mainline and there's an obvious workaround for the problem (disable > CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON). Furthermore, it's very unlikely people will hit > this on production configurations anyway. Pekka, I have been running the patch for ~24 hours with slub_debug=0 as a boot option. So far, no problems. My workload has not involved as many network operations as some times, but my memory has not fragmented. The output of 'cat /proc/buddyinfo' is as follows: Node 0, zone DMA 8 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 3 0 1 Node 0, zone DMA32 1804 1585 3007 36 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 As might be expected, the high-order fragments are gone, but the O(1) pieces have not been depleted. Larry ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb @ 2009-07-08 13:18 ` Larry Finger 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Larry Finger @ 2009-07-08 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pekka Enberg Cc: David Rientjes, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg Pekka Enberg wrote: > > Yup, if it's not too much trouble Larry, I'd appreciate if you gave it > a spin before I apply the sucker. Note to regression trackers, I don't > think this should go to -stable because it depends on other patches in > mainline and there's an obvious workaround for the problem (disable > CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON). Furthermore, it's very unlikely people will hit > this on production configurations anyway. Pekka, I have been running the patch for ~24 hours with slub_debug=0 as a boot option. So far, no problems. My workload has not involved as many network operations as some times, but my memory has not fragmented. The output of 'cat /proc/buddyinfo' is as follows: Node 0, zone DMA 8 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 3 0 1 Node 0, zone DMA32 1804 1585 3007 36 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 As might be expected, the high-order fragments are gone, but the O(1) pieces have not been depleted. Larry ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13318] AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Jerome Glisse, Karsten Mehrhoff, Michel Dänzer, Shaohua Li This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13318 Subject : AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2 Submitter : Karsten Mehrhoff <kawime@gmx.de> Date : 2009-04-30 8:51 (68 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=59de2bebabc5027f93df999d59cc65df591c3e6e References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124108156417560&w=4 Handled-By : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13318] AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2 @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Jerome Glisse, Karsten Mehrhoff, Michel Dänzer, Shaohua Li This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13318 Subject : AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2 Submitter : Karsten Mehrhoff <kawime-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-04-30 8:51 (68 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=59de2bebabc5027f93df999d59cc65df591c3e6e References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124108156417560&w=4 Handled-By : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13318] AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 2:12 ` Shaohua Li -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Shaohua Li @ 2009-07-07 2:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Jerome Glisse, Karsten Mehrhoff, Michel Dänzer On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 08:00:36AM +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13318 > Subject : AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2 > Submitter : Karsten Mehrhoff <kawime@gmx.de> > Date : 2009-04-30 8:51 (68 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=59de2bebabc5027f93df999d59cc65df591c3e6e > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124108156417560&w=4 > Handled-By : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Can anybody else help look at this issue? I really have no idea why this could happens. Thanks, Shaohua ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13318] AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2 @ 2009-07-07 2:12 ` Shaohua Li 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Shaohua Li @ 2009-07-07 2:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Jerome Glisse, Karsten Mehrhoff, Michel Dänzer On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 08:00:36AM +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13318 > Subject : AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2 > Submitter : Karsten Mehrhoff <kawime-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2009-04-30 8:51 (68 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=59de2bebabc5027f93df999d59cc65df591c3e6e > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124108156417560&w=4 > Handled-By : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Can anybody else help look at this issue? I really have no idea why this could happens. Thanks, Shaohua ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13318] AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2 @ 2009-07-07 11:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 11:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Shaohua Li Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Jerome Glisse, Karsten Mehrhoff, Michel Dänzer On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Shaohua Li wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 08:00:36AM +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13318 > > Subject : AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2 > > Submitter : Karsten Mehrhoff <kawime@gmx.de> > > Date : 2009-04-30 8:51 (68 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=59de2bebabc5027f93df999d59cc65df591c3e6e > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124108156417560&w=4 > > Handled-By : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> > Can anybody else help look at this issue? I really have no idea why this could > happens. Quirky hardware? Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13318] AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2 @ 2009-07-07 11:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 11:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Shaohua Li Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Jerome Glisse, Karsten Mehrhoff, Michel Dänzer On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Shaohua Li wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 08:00:36AM +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13318 > > Subject : AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2 > > Submitter : Karsten Mehrhoff <kawime-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2009-04-30 8:51 (68 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=59de2bebabc5027f93df999d59cc65df591c3e6e > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124108156417560&w=4 > > Handled-By : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > Can anybody else help look at this issue? I really have no idea why this could > happens. Quirky hardware? Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13318] AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2 2009-07-07 11:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (?) @ 2009-07-07 11:46 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz @ 2009-07-07 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Shaohua Li, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Jerome Glisse, Karsten Mehrhoff, Michel Dänzer On Tuesday 07 July 2009 13:00:11 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Shaohua Li wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 08:00:36AM +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13318 > > > Subject : AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2 > > > Submitter : Karsten Mehrhoff <kawime@gmx.de> > > > Date : 2009-04-30 8:51 (68 days old) > > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=59de2bebabc5027f93df999d59cc65df591c3e6e > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124108156417560&w=4 > > > Handled-By : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> > > Can anybody else help look at this issue? I really have no idea why this could > > happens. > > Quirky hardware? Could be a weird interaction between CONFIG_X86_USE_3DNOW and AGP or "simply" some timing issue. Either way it means a lot of "fun". ;) The latter theory can be verified by adding some {u,m}delay() to agp_generic_alloc_page{s}() and the former one with: --- arch/x86/Kconfig.cpu | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Index: b/arch/x86/Kconfig.cpu =================================================================== --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig.cpu +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig.cpu @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ config X86_USE_PPRO_CHECKSUM config X86_USE_3DNOW def_bool y - depends on (MCYRIXIII || MK7 || MGEODE_LX) && !UML + depends on (MCYRIXIII || MGEODE_LX) && !UML config X86_OOSTORE def_bool y ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13328] b44: eth0: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 00000002 of register 42c to clear. 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (8 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Francis Moreau, netdev This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13328 Subject : b44: eth0: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 00000002 of register 42c to clear. Submitter : Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com> Date : 2009-05-03 16:22 (65 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124136778012280&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Tomas Janousek This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13337 Subject : [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules Submitter : Tomas Janousek <tomi@nomi.cz> Date : 2009-05-18 10:59 (50 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Tomas Janousek This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13337 Subject : [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules Submitter : Tomas Janousek <tomi-YoqI/XImC7s@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-05-18 10:59 (50 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-08 22:02 ` Jan Scholz -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Jan Scholz @ 2009-07-08 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki, johannes Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Tomas Janousek Hi, I'm not sure if I experience the same bug on my apple iBook G4 (ppc 7447A, altivec supported PowerBook6,5) or just something very similar. With v2.6.30-rc1 I noticed, that suspending to ram does not work if my wireless card is 'up'. The wireless card is an apple airport extreme card, this is its lspci output: 0001:10:12.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4306 802.11b/g Wireless LAN Controller (rev 03) I tested suspend like this: # unload the wireless module modprobe -r b43 echo mem > /sys/power/state # wake up works fine #loading b43 modprobe b43 echo mem > /sys/power/state # wake up still works fine ifconfig wlan0 up echo mem > /sys/power/state # the box does not wake up, I guess it's not really sleeping, because # the sleep led is not on I bisected this and got: 5bb644a0fd25a5e083ecbfaa92a211db99aa6ef7 is first bad commit commit 5bb644a0fd25a5e083ecbfaa92a211db99aa6ef7 Author: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Date: Sun May 17 11:40:42 2009 +0200 mac80211: cancel/restart all timers across suspend/resume Best regards, Jan Scholz "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13337 > Subject : [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules > Submitter : Tomas Janousek <tomi@nomi.cz> > Date : 2009-05-18 10:59 (50 days old) > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules @ 2009-07-08 22:02 ` Jan Scholz 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Jan Scholz @ 2009-07-08 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki, johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Tomas Janousek Hi, I'm not sure if I experience the same bug on my apple iBook G4 (ppc 7447A, altivec supported PowerBook6,5) or just something very similar. With v2.6.30-rc1 I noticed, that suspending to ram does not work if my wireless card is 'up'. The wireless card is an apple airport extreme card, this is its lspci output: 0001:10:12.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4306 802.11b/g Wireless LAN Controller (rev 03) I tested suspend like this: # unload the wireless module modprobe -r b43 echo mem > /sys/power/state # wake up works fine #loading b43 modprobe b43 echo mem > /sys/power/state # wake up still works fine ifconfig wlan0 up echo mem > /sys/power/state # the box does not wake up, I guess it's not really sleeping, because # the sleep led is not on I bisected this and got: 5bb644a0fd25a5e083ecbfaa92a211db99aa6ef7 is first bad commit commit 5bb644a0fd25a5e083ecbfaa92a211db99aa6ef7 Author: Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org> Date: Sun May 17 11:40:42 2009 +0200 mac80211: cancel/restart all timers across suspend/resume Best regards, Jan Scholz "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> writes: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13337 > Subject : [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules > Submitter : Tomas Janousek <tomi-YoqI/XImC7s@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2009-05-18 10:59 (50 days old) > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules @ 2009-07-09 15:14 ` Jan Scholz 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Jan Scholz @ 2009-07-09 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Scholz Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, johannes, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Tomas Janousek Hi, I have just checked this on v2.6.31-rc1 and v2.6.31-rc2-214-g34f2547 (I wanted to test this on v2.6.31-rc2 as well, but there I had other suspend-issues that are fixed in todays v2.6.31-rc2-214-g34f2547) For both v2.6.31-rc1 and v2.6.31-rc2-214-g34f2547 suspend to ram fails with the test procedure described below, but it works fine when I revert commit 5bb644a0fd25a5e083ecbfaa92a211db99aa6ef7 "mac80211: cancel/restart all timers across suspend/resume" Best regards, Jan Jan Scholz <scholz@fias.uni-frankfurt.de> writes: > Hi, > > I'm not sure if I experience the same bug on my apple iBook G4 (ppc > 7447A, altivec supported PowerBook6,5) or just something very similar. > > With v2.6.30-rc1 I noticed, that suspending to ram does not work if my > wireless card is 'up'. The wireless card is an apple airport extreme > card, this is its lspci output: > > 0001:10:12.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4306 802.11b/g Wireless LAN Controller (rev 03) > > I tested suspend like this: > > # unload the wireless module > modprobe -r b43 > echo mem > /sys/power/state > > # wake up works fine > > #loading b43 > modprobe b43 > echo mem > /sys/power/state > > # wake up still works fine > > ifconfig wlan0 up > echo mem > /sys/power/state > > # the box does not wake up, I guess it's not really sleeping, because > # the sleep led is not on > > I bisected this and got: > > 5bb644a0fd25a5e083ecbfaa92a211db99aa6ef7 is first bad commit > commit 5bb644a0fd25a5e083ecbfaa92a211db99aa6ef7 > Author: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> > Date: Sun May 17 11:40:42 2009 +0200 > > mac80211: cancel/restart all timers across suspend/resume > > > Best regards, > Jan Scholz > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes: > >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report >> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. >> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should >> be listed and let me know (either way). >> >> >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13337 >> Subject : [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules >> Submitter : Tomas Janousek <tomi@nomi.cz> >> Date : 2009-05-18 10:59 (50 days old) >> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules @ 2009-07-09 15:14 ` Jan Scholz 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Jan Scholz @ 2009-07-09 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Scholz Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Tomas Janousek Hi, I have just checked this on v2.6.31-rc1 and v2.6.31-rc2-214-g34f2547 (I wanted to test this on v2.6.31-rc2 as well, but there I had other suspend-issues that are fixed in todays v2.6.31-rc2-214-g34f2547) For both v2.6.31-rc1 and v2.6.31-rc2-214-g34f2547 suspend to ram fails with the test procedure described below, but it works fine when I revert commit 5bb644a0fd25a5e083ecbfaa92a211db99aa6ef7 "mac80211: cancel/restart all timers across suspend/resume" Best regards, Jan Jan Scholz <scholz-wOpdxP1gw6Cc+IqHO83+wjjhTm2NLCe8@public.gmane.org> writes: > Hi, > > I'm not sure if I experience the same bug on my apple iBook G4 (ppc > 7447A, altivec supported PowerBook6,5) or just something very similar. > > With v2.6.30-rc1 I noticed, that suspending to ram does not work if my > wireless card is 'up'. The wireless card is an apple airport extreme > card, this is its lspci output: > > 0001:10:12.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4306 802.11b/g Wireless LAN Controller (rev 03) > > I tested suspend like this: > > # unload the wireless module > modprobe -r b43 > echo mem > /sys/power/state > > # wake up works fine > > #loading b43 > modprobe b43 > echo mem > /sys/power/state > > # wake up still works fine > > ifconfig wlan0 up > echo mem > /sys/power/state > > # the box does not wake up, I guess it's not really sleeping, because > # the sleep led is not on > > I bisected this and got: > > 5bb644a0fd25a5e083ecbfaa92a211db99aa6ef7 is first bad commit > commit 5bb644a0fd25a5e083ecbfaa92a211db99aa6ef7 > Author: Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org> > Date: Sun May 17 11:40:42 2009 +0200 > > mac80211: cancel/restart all timers across suspend/resume > > > Best regards, > Jan Scholz > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> writes: > >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report >> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. >> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should >> be listed and let me know (either way). >> >> >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13337 >> Subject : [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules >> Submitter : Tomas Janousek <tomi-YoqI/XImC7s@public.gmane.org> >> Date : 2009-05-18 10:59 (50 days old) >> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules @ 2009-07-09 20:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-09 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Scholz, johannes Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Tomas Janousek, John W. Linville On Thursday 09 July 2009, Jan Scholz wrote: > Hi, > > I have just checked this on v2.6.31-rc1 and v2.6.31-rc2-214-g34f2547 > (I wanted to test this on v2.6.31-rc2 as well, but there I had other > suspend-issues that are fixed in todays v2.6.31-rc2-214-g34f2547) > > For both v2.6.31-rc1 and v2.6.31-rc2-214-g34f2547 suspend to ram fails > with the test procedure described below, but it works fine when I revert > commit 5bb644a0fd25a5e083ecbfaa92a211db99aa6ef7 > "mac80211: cancel/restart all timers across suspend/resume" Thanks for the update. Johannes, do you have any idea what can go wrong here? Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules @ 2009-07-09 20:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-09 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Scholz, johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Tomas Janousek, John W. Linville On Thursday 09 July 2009, Jan Scholz wrote: > Hi, > > I have just checked this on v2.6.31-rc1 and v2.6.31-rc2-214-g34f2547 > (I wanted to test this on v2.6.31-rc2 as well, but there I had other > suspend-issues that are fixed in todays v2.6.31-rc2-214-g34f2547) > > For both v2.6.31-rc1 and v2.6.31-rc2-214-g34f2547 suspend to ram fails > with the test procedure described below, but it works fine when I revert > commit 5bb644a0fd25a5e083ecbfaa92a211db99aa6ef7 > "mac80211: cancel/restart all timers across suspend/resume" Thanks for the update. Johannes, do you have any idea what can go wrong here? Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules @ 2009-07-09 20:28 ` Johannes Berg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Johannes Berg @ 2009-07-09 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Jan Scholz, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Tomas Janousek, John W. Linville [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1109 bytes --] On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 22:03 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday 09 July 2009, Jan Scholz wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have just checked this on v2.6.31-rc1 and v2.6.31-rc2-214-g34f2547 > > (I wanted to test this on v2.6.31-rc2 as well, but there I had other > > suspend-issues that are fixed in todays v2.6.31-rc2-214-g34f2547) > > > > For both v2.6.31-rc1 and v2.6.31-rc2-214-g34f2547 suspend to ram fails > > with the test procedure described below, but it works fine when I revert > > commit 5bb644a0fd25a5e083ecbfaa92a211db99aa6ef7 > > "mac80211: cancel/restart all timers across suspend/resume" > > Thanks for the update. > > Johannes, do you have any idea what can go wrong here? Not really, no. __ieee80211_suspend isn't holding any locks that the cancel_work_sync() calls could require or so afaict... Jan, can you run with console_suspend=0 (or whatever it is now, Rafael will correct me if I'm wrong) that should work on your platform, and put a bunch of printk calls into __ieee80211_suspend in net/mac80211/pm.c to see where in there it's hanging? johannes [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules @ 2009-07-09 20:28 ` Johannes Berg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Johannes Berg @ 2009-07-09 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Jan Scholz, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Tomas Janousek, John W. Linville [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1109 bytes --] On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 22:03 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday 09 July 2009, Jan Scholz wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have just checked this on v2.6.31-rc1 and v2.6.31-rc2-214-g34f2547 > > (I wanted to test this on v2.6.31-rc2 as well, but there I had other > > suspend-issues that are fixed in todays v2.6.31-rc2-214-g34f2547) > > > > For both v2.6.31-rc1 and v2.6.31-rc2-214-g34f2547 suspend to ram fails > > with the test procedure described below, but it works fine when I revert > > commit 5bb644a0fd25a5e083ecbfaa92a211db99aa6ef7 > > "mac80211: cancel/restart all timers across suspend/resume" > > Thanks for the update. > > Johannes, do you have any idea what can go wrong here? Not really, no. __ieee80211_suspend isn't holding any locks that the cancel_work_sync() calls could require or so afaict... Jan, can you run with console_suspend=0 (or whatever it is now, Rafael will correct me if I'm wrong) that should work on your platform, and put a bunch of printk calls into __ieee80211_suspend in net/mac80211/pm.c to see where in there it's hanging? johannes [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules @ 2009-07-09 20:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-09 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Johannes Berg Cc: Jan Scholz, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Tomas Janousek, John W. Linville On Thursday 09 July 2009, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 22:03 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thursday 09 July 2009, Jan Scholz wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have just checked this on v2.6.31-rc1 and v2.6.31-rc2-214-g34f2547 > > > (I wanted to test this on v2.6.31-rc2 as well, but there I had other > > > suspend-issues that are fixed in todays v2.6.31-rc2-214-g34f2547) > > > > > > For both v2.6.31-rc1 and v2.6.31-rc2-214-g34f2547 suspend to ram fails > > > with the test procedure described below, but it works fine when I revert > > > commit 5bb644a0fd25a5e083ecbfaa92a211db99aa6ef7 > > > "mac80211: cancel/restart all timers across suspend/resume" > > > > Thanks for the update. > > > > Johannes, do you have any idea what can go wrong here? > > Not really, no. __ieee80211_suspend isn't holding any locks that the > cancel_work_sync() calls could require or so afaict... > > Jan, can you run with console_suspend=0 (or whatever it is now, Rafael > will correct me if I'm wrong) That's just 'no_console_suspend'. Best, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules @ 2009-07-09 20:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-09 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Johannes Berg Cc: Jan Scholz, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Tomas Janousek, John W. Linville On Thursday 09 July 2009, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 22:03 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thursday 09 July 2009, Jan Scholz wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have just checked this on v2.6.31-rc1 and v2.6.31-rc2-214-g34f2547 > > > (I wanted to test this on v2.6.31-rc2 as well, but there I had other > > > suspend-issues that are fixed in todays v2.6.31-rc2-214-g34f2547) > > > > > > For both v2.6.31-rc1 and v2.6.31-rc2-214-g34f2547 suspend to ram fails > > > with the test procedure described below, but it works fine when I revert > > > commit 5bb644a0fd25a5e083ecbfaa92a211db99aa6ef7 > > > "mac80211: cancel/restart all timers across suspend/resume" > > > > Thanks for the update. > > > > Johannes, do you have any idea what can go wrong here? > > Not really, no. __ieee80211_suspend isn't holding any locks that the > cancel_work_sync() calls could require or so afaict... > > Jan, can you run with console_suspend=0 (or whatever it is now, Rafael > will correct me if I'm wrong) That's just 'no_console_suspend'. Best, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules @ 2009-07-11 14:07 ` Jan Scholz 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Jan Scholz @ 2009-07-11 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Johannes Berg Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Jan Scholz, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Tomas Janousek, John W. Linville Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> writes: > On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 22:03 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Thursday 09 July 2009, Jan Scholz wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I have just checked this on v2.6.31-rc1 and v2.6.31-rc2-214-g34f2547 >> > (I wanted to test this on v2.6.31-rc2 as well, but there I had other >> > suspend-issues that are fixed in todays v2.6.31-rc2-214-g34f2547) >> > >> > For both v2.6.31-rc1 and v2.6.31-rc2-214-g34f2547 suspend to ram fails >> > with the test procedure described below, but it works fine when I revert >> > commit 5bb644a0fd25a5e083ecbfaa92a211db99aa6ef7 >> > "mac80211: cancel/restart all timers across suspend/resume" >> >> Thanks for the update. >> >> Johannes, do you have any idea what can go wrong here? > > Not really, no. __ieee80211_suspend isn't holding any locks that the > cancel_work_sync() calls could require or so afaict... > > Jan, can you run with console_suspend=0 (or whatever it is now, Rafael > will correct me if I'm wrong) that should work on your platform, and put > a bunch of printk calls into __ieee80211_suspend in net/mac80211/pm.c to > see where in there it's hanging? Did that, seems like it hangs in drv_remove_interface(local, &conf); Jan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules @ 2009-07-11 14:07 ` Jan Scholz 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Jan Scholz @ 2009-07-11 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Johannes Berg Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Jan Scholz, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Tomas Janousek, John W. Linville Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org> writes: > On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 22:03 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Thursday 09 July 2009, Jan Scholz wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I have just checked this on v2.6.31-rc1 and v2.6.31-rc2-214-g34f2547 >> > (I wanted to test this on v2.6.31-rc2 as well, but there I had other >> > suspend-issues that are fixed in todays v2.6.31-rc2-214-g34f2547) >> > >> > For both v2.6.31-rc1 and v2.6.31-rc2-214-g34f2547 suspend to ram fails >> > with the test procedure described below, but it works fine when I revert >> > commit 5bb644a0fd25a5e083ecbfaa92a211db99aa6ef7 >> > "mac80211: cancel/restart all timers across suspend/resume" >> >> Thanks for the update. >> >> Johannes, do you have any idea what can go wrong here? > > Not really, no. __ieee80211_suspend isn't holding any locks that the > cancel_work_sync() calls could require or so afaict... > > Jan, can you run with console_suspend=0 (or whatever it is now, Rafael > will correct me if I'm wrong) that should work on your platform, and put > a bunch of printk calls into __ieee80211_suspend in net/mac80211/pm.c to > see where in there it's hanging? Did that, seems like it hangs in drv_remove_interface(local, &conf); Jan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules @ 2009-07-11 14:36 ` Johannes Berg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Johannes Berg @ 2009-07-11 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Scholz Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Tomas Janousek, John W. Linville [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 897 bytes --] On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 16:07 +0200, Jan Scholz wrote: > > Jan, can you run with console_suspend=0 (or whatever it is now, Rafael > > will correct me if I'm wrong) that should work on your platform, and put > > a bunch of printk calls into __ieee80211_suspend in net/mac80211/pm.c to > > see where in there it's hanging? > > Did that, seems like it hangs in > drv_remove_interface(local, &conf); Ok, thanks! I was going to suggest doing the same in b43_op_remove_interface in drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c, but I think the problem is just that we have an ordering problem and call drv_stop before drv_remove_interface. I'll try to come up with a fix soon -- might not be able to today though, in the meantime I guess you can just move the drv_stop call to the end of the function and tell me if that works -- that would be racy but should be ok most of the time. johannes [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules @ 2009-07-11 14:36 ` Johannes Berg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Johannes Berg @ 2009-07-11 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Scholz Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Tomas Janousek, John W. Linville [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 897 bytes --] On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 16:07 +0200, Jan Scholz wrote: > > Jan, can you run with console_suspend=0 (or whatever it is now, Rafael > > will correct me if I'm wrong) that should work on your platform, and put > > a bunch of printk calls into __ieee80211_suspend in net/mac80211/pm.c to > > see where in there it's hanging? > > Did that, seems like it hangs in > drv_remove_interface(local, &conf); Ok, thanks! I was going to suggest doing the same in b43_op_remove_interface in drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c, but I think the problem is just that we have an ordering problem and call drv_stop before drv_remove_interface. I'll try to come up with a fix soon -- might not be able to today though, in the meantime I guess you can just move the drv_stop call to the end of the function and tell me if that works -- that would be racy but should be ok most of the time. johannes [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules @ 2009-07-11 17:20 ` Jan Scholz 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Jan Scholz @ 2009-07-11 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Johannes Berg Cc: Jan Scholz, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Tomas Janousek, John W. Linville Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> writes: > On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 16:07 +0200, Jan Scholz wrote: > >> > Jan, can you run with console_suspend=0 (or whatever it is now, Rafael >> > will correct me if I'm wrong) that should work on your platform, and put >> > a bunch of printk calls into __ieee80211_suspend in net/mac80211/pm.c to >> > see where in there it's hanging? >> >> Did that, seems like it hangs in >> drv_remove_interface(local, &conf); > > Ok, thanks! I was going to suggest doing the same in > b43_op_remove_interface in drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c, but I think > the problem is just that we have an ordering problem and call drv_stop > before drv_remove_interface. I'll try to come up with a fix soon -- > might not be able to today though, in the meantime I guess you can just > move the drv_stop call to the end of the function and tell me if that > works -- that would be racy but should be ok most of the time. I moved drv_stop to the end of the function (see patch below) and now suspend works fine. Jan diff --git a/net/mac80211/pm.c b/net/mac80211/pm.c index 7a549f9..0ac15fb 100644 --- a/net/mac80211/pm.c +++ b/net/mac80211/pm.c @@ -58,12 +58,6 @@ int __ieee80211_suspend(struct ieee80211_hw *hw) /* flush again, in case driver queued work */ flush_workqueue(local->hw.workqueue); - /* stop hardware - this must stop RX */ - if (local->open_count) { - ieee80211_led_radio(local, false); - drv_stop(local); - } - /* remove STAs */ spin_lock_irqsave(&local->sta_lock, flags); list_for_each_entry(sta, &local->sta_list, list) { @@ -111,6 +105,12 @@ int __ieee80211_suspend(struct ieee80211_hw *hw) drv_remove_interface(local, &conf); } + /* stop hardware - this must stop RX */ + if (local->open_count) { + ieee80211_led_radio(local, false); + drv_stop(local); + } + local->suspended = true; local->quiescing = false; ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules @ 2009-07-11 17:20 ` Jan Scholz 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Jan Scholz @ 2009-07-11 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Johannes Berg Cc: Jan Scholz, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Tomas Janousek, John W. Linville Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org> writes: > On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 16:07 +0200, Jan Scholz wrote: > >> > Jan, can you run with console_suspend=0 (or whatever it is now, Rafael >> > will correct me if I'm wrong) that should work on your platform, and put >> > a bunch of printk calls into __ieee80211_suspend in net/mac80211/pm.c to >> > see where in there it's hanging? >> >> Did that, seems like it hangs in >> drv_remove_interface(local, &conf); > > Ok, thanks! I was going to suggest doing the same in > b43_op_remove_interface in drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c, but I think > the problem is just that we have an ordering problem and call drv_stop > before drv_remove_interface. I'll try to come up with a fix soon -- > might not be able to today though, in the meantime I guess you can just > move the drv_stop call to the end of the function and tell me if that > works -- that would be racy but should be ok most of the time. I moved drv_stop to the end of the function (see patch below) and now suspend works fine. Jan diff --git a/net/mac80211/pm.c b/net/mac80211/pm.c index 7a549f9..0ac15fb 100644 --- a/net/mac80211/pm.c +++ b/net/mac80211/pm.c @@ -58,12 +58,6 @@ int __ieee80211_suspend(struct ieee80211_hw *hw) /* flush again, in case driver queued work */ flush_workqueue(local->hw.workqueue); - /* stop hardware - this must stop RX */ - if (local->open_count) { - ieee80211_led_radio(local, false); - drv_stop(local); - } - /* remove STAs */ spin_lock_irqsave(&local->sta_lock, flags); list_for_each_entry(sta, &local->sta_list, list) { @@ -111,6 +105,12 @@ int __ieee80211_suspend(struct ieee80211_hw *hw) drv_remove_interface(local, &conf); } + /* stop hardware - this must stop RX */ + if (local->open_count) { + ieee80211_led_radio(local, false); + drv_stop(local); + } + local->suspended = true; local->quiescing = false; ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules @ 2009-07-11 17:47 ` Johannes Berg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Johannes Berg @ 2009-07-11 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Scholz Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Tomas Janousek, John W. Linville [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2231 bytes --] On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 19:20 +0200, Jan Scholz wrote: > Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> writes: > > > On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 16:07 +0200, Jan Scholz wrote: > > > >> > Jan, can you run with console_suspend=0 (or whatever it is now, Rafael > >> > will correct me if I'm wrong) that should work on your platform, and put > >> > a bunch of printk calls into __ieee80211_suspend in net/mac80211/pm.c to > >> > see where in there it's hanging? > >> > >> Did that, seems like it hangs in > >> drv_remove_interface(local, &conf); > > > > Ok, thanks! I was going to suggest doing the same in > > b43_op_remove_interface in drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c, but I think > > the problem is just that we have an ordering problem and call drv_stop > > before drv_remove_interface. I'll try to come up with a fix soon -- > > might not be able to today though, in the meantime I guess you can just > > move the drv_stop call to the end of the function and tell me if that > > works -- that would be racy but should be ok most of the time. > > I moved drv_stop to the end of the function (see patch below) and now > suspend works fine. Thanks, that's what I suspected -- I'll take a closer look into what is required to make it race-free against RX. johannes > Jan > > diff --git a/net/mac80211/pm.c b/net/mac80211/pm.c > index 7a549f9..0ac15fb 100644 > --- a/net/mac80211/pm.c > +++ b/net/mac80211/pm.c > @@ -58,12 +58,6 @@ int __ieee80211_suspend(struct ieee80211_hw *hw) > /* flush again, in case driver queued work */ > flush_workqueue(local->hw.workqueue); > > - /* stop hardware - this must stop RX */ > - if (local->open_count) { > - ieee80211_led_radio(local, false); > - drv_stop(local); > - } > - > /* remove STAs */ > spin_lock_irqsave(&local->sta_lock, flags); > list_for_each_entry(sta, &local->sta_list, list) { > @@ -111,6 +105,12 @@ int __ieee80211_suspend(struct ieee80211_hw *hw) > drv_remove_interface(local, &conf); > } > > + /* stop hardware - this must stop RX */ > + if (local->open_count) { > + ieee80211_led_radio(local, false); > + drv_stop(local); > + } > + > local->suspended = true; > local->quiescing = false; > [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules @ 2009-07-11 17:47 ` Johannes Berg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Johannes Berg @ 2009-07-11 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Scholz Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Tomas Janousek, John W. Linville [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2254 bytes --] On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 19:20 +0200, Jan Scholz wrote: > Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org> writes: > > > On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 16:07 +0200, Jan Scholz wrote: > > > >> > Jan, can you run with console_suspend=0 (or whatever it is now, Rafael > >> > will correct me if I'm wrong) that should work on your platform, and put > >> > a bunch of printk calls into __ieee80211_suspend in net/mac80211/pm.c to > >> > see where in there it's hanging? > >> > >> Did that, seems like it hangs in > >> drv_remove_interface(local, &conf); > > > > Ok, thanks! I was going to suggest doing the same in > > b43_op_remove_interface in drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c, but I think > > the problem is just that we have an ordering problem and call drv_stop > > before drv_remove_interface. I'll try to come up with a fix soon -- > > might not be able to today though, in the meantime I guess you can just > > move the drv_stop call to the end of the function and tell me if that > > works -- that would be racy but should be ok most of the time. > > I moved drv_stop to the end of the function (see patch below) and now > suspend works fine. Thanks, that's what I suspected -- I'll take a closer look into what is required to make it race-free against RX. johannes > Jan > > diff --git a/net/mac80211/pm.c b/net/mac80211/pm.c > index 7a549f9..0ac15fb 100644 > --- a/net/mac80211/pm.c > +++ b/net/mac80211/pm.c > @@ -58,12 +58,6 @@ int __ieee80211_suspend(struct ieee80211_hw *hw) > /* flush again, in case driver queued work */ > flush_workqueue(local->hw.workqueue); > > - /* stop hardware - this must stop RX */ > - if (local->open_count) { > - ieee80211_led_radio(local, false); > - drv_stop(local); > - } > - > /* remove STAs */ > spin_lock_irqsave(&local->sta_lock, flags); > list_for_each_entry(sta, &local->sta_list, list) { > @@ -111,6 +105,12 @@ int __ieee80211_suspend(struct ieee80211_hw *hw) > drv_remove_interface(local, &conf); > } > > + /* stop hardware - this must stop RX */ > + if (local->open_count) { > + ieee80211_led_radio(local, false); > + drv_stop(local); > + } > + > local->suspended = true; > local->quiescing = false; > [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* 2.6.31-rc4: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 @ 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2009-07-27 143 48 45 2009-07-07 138 50 46 2009-06-29 133 46 43 2009-06-07 110 35 31 2009-05-31 100 32 27 2009-05-24 92 34 27 2009-05-16 81 36 33 2009-04-25 55 36 26 2009-04-17 37 35 28 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13797 Subject : iBook G4 doesn't suspend since 2ed8d2b3a8 Submitter : Jörg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de> Date : 2009-07-18 20:18 (9 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13795 Subject : abnormal boot and no suspend due to 'async' (fastboot) Submitter : Rafal Kaczynski <fscnoboot@wp.pl> Date : 2009-07-18 17:19 (9 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13780 Subject : NULL pointer dereference loading powernowk8 Submitter : Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> Date : 2009-07-15 18:00 (12 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13751 Subject : oops on HP/Compaq 6910p lid closure Submitter : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Date : 2009-07-09 15:17 (18 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13739 Subject : 2.6.30 leaking keys on console switch Submitter : Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Date : 2009-07-07 8:44 (20 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124695628924382&w=4 Handled-By : Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13694 Subject : i915 phantom TV Submitter : Maciek Józiewicz <mjoziew@gmail.com> Date : 2009-07-02 12:26 (25 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13682 Subject : The webcam stopped working when upgrading from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30 Submitter : Nathanael Schaeffer <nathanael.schaeffer@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-30 13:34 (27 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13681 Subject : A number of usb Devices causes Oops messages and kernel panics. Submitter : Alexander Kaltsas <alexkaltsas@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-30 13:06 (27 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13669 Subject : Kernel bug with dock driver Submitter : Joerg Platte <jplatte@naasa.net> Date : 2009-06-14 21:00 (43 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/14/216 Handled-By : Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13660 Subject : Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs Submitter : Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-27 16:07 (30 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/95 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13648 Subject : nfsd: page allocation failure Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com> Date : 2009-06-22 12:08 (35 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/22/309 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124748600712853&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13646 Subject : warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2009-06-19 17:05 (38 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/19/187 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13644 Subject : hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net> Date : 2009-06-16 01:27 (41 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/15/630 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/504 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13638 Subject : rt2870 driver is broken for (some) cards Submitter : jakob gruber <jakob.gruber@kabelnet.at> Date : 2009-06-27 17:33 (30 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13634 Subject : [drm:drm_wait_vblank] *ERROR* failed to acquire vblank counter, -22 Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz> Date : 2009-06-27 07:02 (30 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13624 Subject : usb: wrong autosuspend initialization Submitter : <list@phuk.ath.cx> Date : 2009-06-25 18:18 (32 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13621 Subject : xfs hangs with assertion failed Submitter : Johannes Engel <jcnengel@googlemail.com> Date : 2009-06-25 10:07 (32 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13620 Subject : acpi_enforce_resources broken - conflicting i2c module loaded on some EeePCs Submitter : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk> Date : 2009-06-25 08:31 (32 days old) References : <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-eeepc-devel/2009-June/002316.html> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13583 Subject : pdflush uses 5% CPU on otherwise idle system Submitter : Paul Martin <pm@debian.org> Date : 2009-06-19 13:33 (38 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13581 Subject : ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels Submitter : Matteo <rootkit85@yahoo.it> Date : 2009-06-19 12:04 (38 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13564 Subject : random general protection fault at boot time caused by khubd. Submitter : Pauli <suokkos@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-18 12:44 (39 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13558 Subject : Tracelog during resume Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz> Date : 2009-06-17 11:32 (40 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13554 Subject : linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window Submitter : Jos van Wolput <wolput@onsneteindhoven.nl> Date : 2009-06-17 06:28 (40 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124686965407853&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13518 Subject : slab grows with NFS write activity. Submitter : Andrew Randrianasulu <randrik@mail.ru> Date : 2009-06-12 09:51 (45 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13514 Subject : acer_wmi causes stack corruption Submitter : Rus <harbour@sfinx.od.ua> Date : 2009-06-12 08:13 (45 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13512 Subject : D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore Submitter : Daniel Smolik <marvin@mydatex.cz> Date : 2009-06-11 20:12 (46 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13502 Subject : GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1 Submitter : <sveina@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-10 20:04 (47 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13472 Subject : Oops with minicom and USB serial Submitter : Peter Chubb <peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au> Date : 2009-06-05 1:37 (52 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124416901026700&w=4 Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13471 Subject : Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled Submitter : Ozan Çağlayan <ozan@pardus.org.tr> Date : 2009-06-04 9:12 (53 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124410667532558&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13424 Subject : possible deadlock when doing governor switching Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Date : 2009-05-31 16:36 (57 days old) References : http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg00711.html http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/28/405 Handled-By : Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13408 Subject : Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7 Submitter : Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com> Date : 2009-05-30 18:51 (58 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/30/146 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13407 Subject : adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram Submitter : Jan Scholz <scholz@fias.uni-frankfurt.de> Date : 2009-05-28 7:59 (60 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ed8d2b3a81bdbb0418301628ccdb008ac9f40b7 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124349762314976&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13401 Subject : pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected) Submitter : Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@free.fr> Date : 2009-05-28 18:43 (60 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13374 Subject : reiserfs blocked for more than 120secs Submitter : Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@t-online.de> Date : 2009-05-23 8:52 (65 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124306880410811&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/29/389 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13373 Subject : fbcon, intelfb, i915: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> Date : 2009-05-23 5:08 (65 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124305538130702&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362 Subject : rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap Submitter : Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com> Date : 2009-05-22 13:32 (66 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13351 Subject : 2.6.30 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk Submitter : <unggnu@googlemail.com> Date : 2009-05-20 14:09 (68 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=78a8b35bc7abf8b8333d6f625e08c0f7cc1c3742 Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13341 Subject : Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules Submitter : <patrick@ostenberg.de> Date : 2009-05-19 09:08 (69 days old) Handled-By : Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13337 Subject : [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules Submitter : Tomas Janousek <tomi@nomi.cz> Date : 2009-05-18 10:59 (70 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13328 Subject : b44: eth0: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 00000002 of register 42c to clear. Submitter : Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com> Date : 2009-05-03 16:22 (85 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124136778012280&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319 Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (89 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136 Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13318 Subject : AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2 Submitter : Karsten Mehrhoff <kawime@gmx.de> Date : 2009-04-30 8:51 (88 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=59de2bebabc5027f93df999d59cc65df591c3e6e References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124108156417560&w=4 Handled-By : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13306 Subject : hibernate slow on _second_ run Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Date : 2009-05-14 09:34 (74 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13219 Subject : Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.4 Submitter : David Hill <hilld@binarystorm.net> Date : 2009-05-01 16:57 (87 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13109 Subject : High latency on /sys/class/thermal Submitter : Tiago Simões Batista <tiagosbatista@gmail.com> Date : 2009-04-11 14:56 (107 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123946182301248&w=4 Handled-By : Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13649 Subject : Bad page state in process with various applications Submitter : Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-20 15:27 (37 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=124551168828090&w=4 Handled-By : Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/33130/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13475 Subject : suspend/hibernate lockdep warning Submitter : Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-02 10:00 (55 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124393723321241&w=4 Handled-By : Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/28660/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389 Subject : Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2009-05-26 15:24 (62 days old) Handled-By : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672 For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13070 Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* 2.6.31-rc4: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 @ 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: DRI, Linux SCSI List, Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Natalie Protasevich, Linux ACPI, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds, Linux PM List This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2009-07-27 143 48 45 2009-07-07 138 50 46 2009-06-29 133 46 43 2009-06-07 110 35 31 2009-05-31 100 32 27 2009-05-24 92 34 27 2009-05-16 81 36 33 2009-04-25 55 36 26 2009-04-17 37 35 28 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13797 Subject : iBook G4 doesn't suspend since 2ed8d2b3a8 Submitter : Jörg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de> Date : 2009-07-18 20:18 (9 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13795 Subject : abnormal boot and no suspend due to 'async' (fastboot) Submitter : Rafal Kaczynski <fscnoboot@wp.pl> Date : 2009-07-18 17:19 (9 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13780 Subject : NULL pointer dereference loading powernowk8 Submitter : Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> Date : 2009-07-15 18:00 (12 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13751 Subject : oops on HP/Compaq 6910p lid closure Submitter : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Date : 2009-07-09 15:17 (18 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13739 Subject : 2.6.30 leaking keys on console switch Submitter : Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Date : 2009-07-07 8:44 (20 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124695628924382&w=4 Handled-By : Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13694 Subject : i915 phantom TV Submitter : Maciek Józiewicz <mjoziew@gmail.com> Date : 2009-07-02 12:26 (25 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13682 Subject : The webcam stopped working when upgrading from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30 Submitter : Nathanael Schaeffer <nathanael.schaeffer@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-30 13:34 (27 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13681 Subject : A number of usb Devices causes Oops messages and kernel panics. Submitter : Alexander Kaltsas <alexkaltsas@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-30 13:06 (27 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13669 Subject : Kernel bug with dock driver Submitter : Joerg Platte <jplatte@naasa.net> Date : 2009-06-14 21:00 (43 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/14/216 Handled-By : Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13660 Subject : Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs Submitter : Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-27 16:07 (30 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/95 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13648 Subject : nfsd: page allocation failure Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com> Date : 2009-06-22 12:08 (35 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/22/309 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124748600712853&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13646 Subject : warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2009-06-19 17:05 (38 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/19/187 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13644 Subject : hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net> Date : 2009-06-16 01:27 (41 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/15/630 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/504 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13638 Subject : rt2870 driver is broken for (some) cards Submitter : jakob gruber <jakob.gruber@kabelnet.at> Date : 2009-06-27 17:33 (30 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13634 Subject : [drm:drm_wait_vblank] *ERROR* failed to acquire vblank counter, -22 Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz> Date : 2009-06-27 07:02 (30 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13624 Subject : usb: wrong autosuspend initialization Submitter : <list@phuk.ath.cx> Date : 2009-06-25 18:18 (32 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13621 Subject : xfs hangs with assertion failed Submitter : Johannes Engel <jcnengel@googlemail.com> Date : 2009-06-25 10:07 (32 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13620 Subject : acpi_enforce_resources broken - conflicting i2c module loaded on some EeePCs Submitter : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk> Date : 2009-06-25 08:31 (32 days old) References : <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-eeepc-devel/2009-June/002316.html> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13583 Subject : pdflush uses 5% CPU on otherwise idle system Submitter : Paul Martin <pm@debian.org> Date : 2009-06-19 13:33 (38 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13581 Subject : ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels Submitter : Matteo <rootkit85@yahoo.it> Date : 2009-06-19 12:04 (38 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13564 Subject : random general protection fault at boot time caused by khubd. Submitter : Pauli <suokkos@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-18 12:44 (39 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13558 Subject : Tracelog during resume Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz> Date : 2009-06-17 11:32 (40 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13554 Subject : linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window Submitter : Jos van Wolput <wolput@onsneteindhoven.nl> Date : 2009-06-17 06:28 (40 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124686965407853&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13518 Subject : slab grows with NFS write activity. Submitter : Andrew Randrianasulu <randrik@mail.ru> Date : 2009-06-12 09:51 (45 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13514 Subject : acer_wmi causes stack corruption Submitter : Rus <harbour@sfinx.od.ua> Date : 2009-06-12 08:13 (45 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13512 Subject : D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore Submitter : Daniel Smolik <marvin@mydatex.cz> Date : 2009-06-11 20:12 (46 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13502 Subject : GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1 Submitter : <sveina@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-10 20:04 (47 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13472 Subject : Oops with minicom and USB serial Submitter : Peter Chubb <peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au> Date : 2009-06-05 1:37 (52 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124416901026700&w=4 Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13471 Subject : Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled Submitter : Ozan Çağlayan <ozan@pardus.org.tr> Date : 2009-06-04 9:12 (53 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124410667532558&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13424 Subject : possible deadlock when doing governor switching Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Date : 2009-05-31 16:36 (57 days old) References : http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg00711.html http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/28/405 Handled-By : Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13408 Subject : Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7 Submitter : Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com> Date : 2009-05-30 18:51 (58 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/30/146 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13407 Subject : adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram Submitter : Jan Scholz <scholz@fias.uni-frankfurt.de> Date : 2009-05-28 7:59 (60 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ed8d2b3a81bdbb0418301628ccdb008ac9f40b7 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124349762314976&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13401 Subject : pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected) Submitter : Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@free.fr> Date : 2009-05-28 18:43 (60 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13374 Subject : reiserfs blocked for more than 120secs Submitter : Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@t-online.de> Date : 2009-05-23 8:52 (65 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124306880410811&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/29/389 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13373 Subject : fbcon, intelfb, i915: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> Date : 2009-05-23 5:08 (65 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124305538130702&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362 Subject : rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap Submitter : Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com> Date : 2009-05-22 13:32 (66 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13351 Subject : 2.6.30 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk Submitter : <unggnu@googlemail.com> Date : 2009-05-20 14:09 (68 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=78a8b35bc7abf8b8333d6f625e08c0f7cc1c3742 Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13341 Subject : Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules Submitter : <patrick@ostenberg.de> Date : 2009-05-19 09:08 (69 days old) Handled-By : Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13337 Subject : [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules Submitter : Tomas Janousek <tomi@nomi.cz> Date : 2009-05-18 10:59 (70 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13328 Subject : b44: eth0: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 00000002 of register 42c to clear. Submitter : Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com> Date : 2009-05-03 16:22 (85 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124136778012280&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319 Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (89 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136 Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13318 Subject : AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2 Submitter : Karsten Mehrhoff <kawime@gmx.de> Date : 2009-04-30 8:51 (88 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=59de2bebabc5027f93df999d59cc65df591c3e6e References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124108156417560&w=4 Handled-By : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13306 Subject : hibernate slow on _second_ run Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Date : 2009-05-14 09:34 (74 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13219 Subject : Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.4 Submitter : David Hill <hilld@binarystorm.net> Date : 2009-05-01 16:57 (87 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13109 Subject : High latency on /sys/class/thermal Submitter : Tiago Simões Batista <tiagosbatista@gmail.com> Date : 2009-04-11 14:56 (107 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123946182301248&w=4 Handled-By : Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13649 Subject : Bad page state in process with various applications Submitter : Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-20 15:27 (37 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=124551168828090&w=4 Handled-By : Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/33130/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13475 Subject : suspend/hibernate lockdep warning Submitter : Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-02 10:00 (55 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124393723321241&w=4 Handled-By : Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/28660/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389 Subject : Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2009-05-26 15:24 (62 days old) Handled-By : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672 For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13070 Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks, Rafael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13109] High latency on /sys/class/thermal 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexey Starikovskiy, Tiago Simões Batista, Zhang Rui This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13109 Subject : High latency on /sys/class/thermal Submitter : Tiago Simões Batista <tiagosbatista@gmail.com> Date : 2009-04-11 14:56 (107 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123946182301248&w=4 Handled-By : Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13109] High latency on /sys/class/thermal @ 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexey Starikovskiy, Tiago Simões Batista, Zhang Rui This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13109 Subject : High latency on /sys/class/thermal Submitter : Tiago Sim√µes Batista <tiagosbatista-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-04-11 14:56 (107 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123946182301248&w=4 Handled-By : Zhang Rui <rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (?) (?) @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-07-27 0:17 ` Larry Finger -1 siblings, 1 reply; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, Larry Finger This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319 Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (89 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136 Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb 2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 0:17 ` Larry Finger 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Larry Finger @ 2009-07-27 0:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319 > Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> > Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (89 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4 > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136 > Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> This bug was fixed by commit 781b2ba6eb5f22440afac9c79a89ebd6e3674a60 entitled "SLUB: Out-of-memory diagnostics" by Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> and dated Wed Jun 10 18:50:32 2009 +0300. The fault occurred because when CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG was set, many of the memory allocations for wireless buffers were increased from O(0) to O(1) causing memory fragmentation, and eventually there were no remaining O(1) fragments. This problem is unlikely to affect most users as none of the distos turn on the above debug option. This bug should be marked "closed with patch". Larry ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb @ 2009-07-27 0:17 ` Larry Finger 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Larry Finger @ 2009-07-27 0:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319 > Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (89 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4 > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136 > Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org> This bug was fixed by commit 781b2ba6eb5f22440afac9c79a89ebd6e3674a60 entitled "SLUB: Out-of-memory diagnostics" by Pekka Enberg <penberg-bbCR+/B0CizivPeTLB3BmA@public.gmane.org> and dated Wed Jun 10 18:50:32 2009 +0300. The fault occurred because when CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG was set, many of the memory allocations for wireless buffers were increased from O(0) to O(1) causing memory fragmentation, and eventually there were no remaining O(1) fragments. This problem is unlikely to affect most users as none of the distos turn on the above debug option. This bug should be marked "closed with patch". Larry ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb @ 2009-07-27 0:24 ` David Rientjes 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: David Rientjes @ 2009-07-27 0:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Larry Finger Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, Pekka Enberg On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Larry Finger wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319 > > Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb > > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> > > Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (89 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4 > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136 > > Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> > > This bug was fixed by commit 781b2ba6eb5f22440afac9c79a89ebd6e3674a60 > entitled "SLUB: Out-of-memory diagnostics" by Pekka Enberg > <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> and dated Wed Jun 10 18:50:32 2009 +0300. > Hmm, I'm remembering differently. I thought the root problem here has only been fixed in Pekka's slab-2.6.git tree with "slub: add option to disable higher order debugging slabs" and isn't currently in Linus' tree. > The fault occurred because when CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG was set, many of the > memory allocations for wireless buffers were increased from O(0) to > O(1) causing memory fragmentation, and eventually there were no > remaining O(1) fragments. This problem is unlikely to affect most > users as none of the distos turn on the above debug option. > It only happens when CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON is enabled for caches with sizes that increase as the result of the added metadata. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb @ 2009-07-27 0:24 ` David Rientjes 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: David Rientjes @ 2009-07-27 0:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Larry Finger Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, Pekka Enberg On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Larry Finger wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319 > > Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb > > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (89 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4 > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136 > > Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org> > > This bug was fixed by commit 781b2ba6eb5f22440afac9c79a89ebd6e3674a60 > entitled "SLUB: Out-of-memory diagnostics" by Pekka Enberg > <penberg-bbCR+/B0CizivPeTLB3BmA@public.gmane.org> and dated Wed Jun 10 18:50:32 2009 +0300. > Hmm, I'm remembering differently. I thought the root problem here has only been fixed in Pekka's slab-2.6.git tree with "slub: add option to disable higher order debugging slabs" and isn't currently in Linus' tree. > The fault occurred because when CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG was set, many of the > memory allocations for wireless buffers were increased from O(0) to > O(1) causing memory fragmentation, and eventually there were no > remaining O(1) fragments. This problem is unlikely to affect most > users as none of the distos turn on the above debug option. > It only happens when CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON is enabled for caches with sizes that increase as the result of the added metadata. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb @ 2009-07-27 7:08 ` Pekka Enberg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-07-27 7:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Rientjes Cc: Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, Christoph Lameter On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 3:24 AM, David Rientjes<rientjes@google.com> wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Larry Finger wrote: > >> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report >> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. >> > >> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >> > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should >> > be listed and let me know (either way). >> > >> > >> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319 >> > Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb >> > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> >> > Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (89 days old) >> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4 >> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136 >> > Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> >> >> This bug was fixed by commit 781b2ba6eb5f22440afac9c79a89ebd6e3674a60 >> entitled "SLUB: Out-of-memory diagnostics" by Pekka Enberg >> <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> and dated Wed Jun 10 18:50:32 2009 +0300. >> > > Hmm, I'm remembering differently. I thought the root problem here has > only been fixed in Pekka's slab-2.6.git tree with "slub: add option to > disable higher order debugging slabs" and isn't currently in Linus' tree. Yup, the fix is in slab.git and queued for 2.6.32. There was some complaints from Christoph from the patch that need to be addressed still. Pekka ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb @ 2009-07-27 7:08 ` Pekka Enberg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-07-27 7:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Rientjes Cc: Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, Christoph Lameter On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 3:24 AM, David Rientjes<rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Larry Finger wrote: > >> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report >> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. >> > >> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >> > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should >> > be listed and let me know (either way). >> > >> > >> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319 >> > Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb >> > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> >> > Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (89 days old) >> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4 >> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136 >> > Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org> >> >> This bug was fixed by commit 781b2ba6eb5f22440afac9c79a89ebd6e3674a60 >> entitled "SLUB: Out-of-memory diagnostics" by Pekka Enberg >> <penberg-bbCR+/B0CizivPeTLB3BmA@public.gmane.org> and dated Wed Jun 10 18:50:32 2009 +0300. >> > > Hmm, I'm remembering differently. I thought the root problem here has > only been fixed in Pekka's slab-2.6.git tree with "slub: add option to > disable higher order debugging slabs" and isn't currently in Linus' tree. Yup, the fix is in slab.git and queued for 2.6.32. There was some complaints from Christoph from the patch that need to be addressed still. Pekka ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb @ 2009-07-27 9:37 ` David Rientjes 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: David Rientjes @ 2009-07-27 9:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pekka Enberg Cc: Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, Christoph Lameter [-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 1143 bytes --] On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > Hmm, I'm remembering differently. I thought the root problem here has > > only been fixed in Pekka's slab-2.6.git tree with "slub: add option to > > disable higher order debugging slabs" and isn't currently in Linus' tree. > > Yup, the fix is in slab.git and queued for 2.6.32. There was some > complaints from Christoph from the patch that need to be addressed > still. > >From what I recall, he asked that calculate_sizes() be called twice, first to determine if get_order(s->size) increased as the result of the metadata and, if so, a second time with the flags disabled. slab_debug=O only disables debugging options that increase the min order of slab as defined in DEBUG_FLAGS; it doesn't selectively disable some of them when get_order(s->size) grows. So it's quite sane, like my patch does, to disable all DEBUG_FLAGS when get_order(s->objsize) + DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS > get_order(s->objsize) without calling calculate_sizes() twice. We need DEBUG_FLAGS to determine which flags to mask off to reduce the minimum order, so I don't see DEBUG_FLAGS_SIZE as troublesome. Christoph? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb @ 2009-07-27 9:37 ` David Rientjes 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: David Rientjes @ 2009-07-27 9:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pekka Enberg Cc: Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, Christoph Lameter [-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 1169 bytes --] On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > Hmm, I'm remembering differently. I thought the root problem here has > > only been fixed in Pekka's slab-2.6.git tree with "slub: add option to > > disable higher order debugging slabs" and isn't currently in Linus' tree. > > Yup, the fix is in slab.git and queued for 2.6.32. There was some > complaints from Christoph from the patch that need to be addressed > still. > From what I recall, he asked that calculate_sizes() be called twice, first to determine if get_order(s->size) increased as the result of the metadata and, if so, a second time with the flags disabled. slab_debug=O only disables debugging options that increase the min order of slab as defined in DEBUG_FLAGS; it doesn't selectively disable some of them when get_order(s->size) grows. So it's quite sane, like my patch does, to disable all DEBUG_FLAGS when get_order(s->objsize) + DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS > get_order(s->objsize) without calling calculate_sizes() twice. We need DEBUG_FLAGS to determine which flags to mask off to reduce the minimum order, so I don't see DEBUG_FLAGS_SIZE as troublesome. Christoph? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb @ 2009-07-27 17:20 ` Christoph Lameter 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Christoph Lameter @ 2009-07-27 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Rientjes Cc: Pekka Enberg, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, David Rientjes wrote: > We need DEBUG_FLAGS to determine which flags to mask off to reduce the > minimum order, so I don't see DEBUG_FLAGS_SIZE as troublesome. > > Christoph? Post a patch? Otherwise just go ahead. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb @ 2009-07-27 17:20 ` Christoph Lameter 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Christoph Lameter @ 2009-07-27 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Rientjes Cc: Pekka Enberg, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, David Rientjes wrote: > We need DEBUG_FLAGS to determine which flags to mask off to reduce the > minimum order, so I don't see DEBUG_FLAGS_SIZE as troublesome. > > Christoph? Post a patch? Otherwise just go ahead. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb @ 2009-07-27 18:16 ` David Rientjes 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: David Rientjes @ 2009-07-27 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Pekka Enberg, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, David Rientjes wrote: > > > We need DEBUG_FLAGS to determine which flags to mask off to reduce the > > minimum order, so I don't see DEBUG_FLAGS_SIZE as troublesome. > > > > Christoph? > > Post a patch? Otherwise just go ahead. > > My patch is already in Pekka's slab-2.6.git tree at http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/penberg/slab-2.6.git;a=commit;h=fa5ec8a1f66f3c2a3af723abcf8085509c9ee682 You had proposed http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124725166205814, which moves the mask to kmem_cache_open() and calls calculate_sizes() twice. That eliminates DEBUG_FLAGS_SIZE, but I don't see that define as being troublesome since we must define DEBUG_FLAGS to specify what options add metdata anyway. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb @ 2009-07-27 18:16 ` David Rientjes 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: David Rientjes @ 2009-07-27 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Pekka Enberg, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, David Rientjes wrote: > > > We need DEBUG_FLAGS to determine which flags to mask off to reduce the > > minimum order, so I don't see DEBUG_FLAGS_SIZE as troublesome. > > > > Christoph? > > Post a patch? Otherwise just go ahead. > > My patch is already in Pekka's slab-2.6.git tree at http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/penberg/slab-2.6.git;a=commit;h=fa5ec8a1f66f3c2a3af723abcf8085509c9ee682 You had proposed http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124725166205814, which moves the mask to kmem_cache_open() and calls calculate_sizes() twice. That eliminates DEBUG_FLAGS_SIZE, but I don't see that define as being troublesome since we must define DEBUG_FLAGS to specify what options add metdata anyway. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb @ 2009-07-27 21:43 ` Christoph Lameter 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Christoph Lameter @ 2009-07-27 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Rientjes Cc: Pekka Enberg, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, David Rientjes wrote: > My patch is already in Pekka's slab-2.6.git tree at > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/penberg/slab-2.6.git;a=commit;h=fa5ec8a1f66f3c2a3af723abcf8085509c9ee682 > > You had proposed http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124725166205814, which > moves the mask to kmem_cache_open() and calls calculate_sizes() twice. > That eliminates DEBUG_FLAGS_SIZE, but I don't see that define as being > troublesome since we must define DEBUG_FLAGS to specify what options add > metdata anyway. My prosal was to use the size and objsize parameters. You would only have to call calculate_sizes() twice when the comparison of the order of size and objsize would be different. Doing so would simplify additing future flags. If you do your own calculations (like in the patch) then you have to replicate the size calculation from calculate_sizes() somehow. Is the duplicate calculation really accurate regarding alignment and other special casing? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb @ 2009-07-27 21:43 ` Christoph Lameter 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Christoph Lameter @ 2009-07-27 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Rientjes Cc: Pekka Enberg, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, David Rientjes wrote: > My patch is already in Pekka's slab-2.6.git tree at > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/penberg/slab-2.6.git;a=commit;h=fa5ec8a1f66f3c2a3af723abcf8085509c9ee682 > > You had proposed http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124725166205814, which > moves the mask to kmem_cache_open() and calls calculate_sizes() twice. > That eliminates DEBUG_FLAGS_SIZE, but I don't see that define as being > troublesome since we must define DEBUG_FLAGS to specify what options add > metdata anyway. My prosal was to use the size and objsize parameters. You would only have to call calculate_sizes() twice when the comparison of the order of size and objsize would be different. Doing so would simplify additing future flags. If you do your own calculations (like in the patch) then you have to replicate the size calculation from calculate_sizes() somehow. Is the duplicate calculation really accurate regarding alignment and other special casing? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb 2009-07-27 21:43 ` Christoph Lameter (?) @ 2009-07-27 22:38 ` David Rientjes 2009-07-28 1:30 ` David Rientjes -1 siblings, 1 reply; 336+ messages in thread From: David Rientjes @ 2009-07-27 22:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Pekka Enberg, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Christoph Lameter wrote: > My prosal was to use the size and objsize parameters. You would only have > to call calculate_sizes() twice when the comparison of the order of size > and objsize would be different. > > Doing so would simplify additing future flags. If you do your own > calculations (like in the patch) then you have to replicate the size > calculation from calculate_sizes() somehow. Is the duplicate calculation > really accurate regarding alignment and other special casing? > Ok, fair enough. It seems like a matter of taste in implementation but your proposal is also more extendable than mine, and I'm definitely not going to argue your taste vs. mine when it comes to slub :) I'll write an incremental patch on top of Pekka's for-next branch to implement your idea. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [patch] slub: use size and objsize orders to disable debug flags @ 2009-07-28 1:30 ` David Rientjes 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: David Rientjes @ 2009-07-28 1:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pekka Enberg Cc: Christoph Lameter, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg This patch moves the masking of debugging flags which increase a cache's min order due to metadata when `slub_debug=O' is used from kmem_cache_flags() to kmem_cache_open(). Instead of defining the maximum metadata size increase in a preprocessor macro, this approach uses the cache's ->size and ->objsize members to determine if the min order increased due to debugging options. If so, the flags specified in the more appropriately named DEBUG_METADATA_FLAGS are masked off. This approach was suggested by Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>. Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> --- mm/slub.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c --- a/mm/slub.c +++ b/mm/slub.c @@ -142,11 +142,11 @@ SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER) /* - * Debugging flags that require metadata to be stored in the slab, up to - * DEBUG_SIZE in size. + * Debugging flags that require metadata to be stored in the slab. These get + * disabled when slub_debug=O is used and a cache's min order increases with + * metadata. */ -#define DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS (SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER) -#define DEBUG_SIZE (3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track)) +#define DEBUG_METADATA_FLAGS (SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER) /* * Set of flags that will prevent slab merging @@ -1040,27 +1040,13 @@ static unsigned long kmem_cache_flags(unsigned long objsize, unsigned long flags, const char *name, void (*ctor)(void *)) { - int debug_flags = slub_debug; - /* * Enable debugging if selected on the kernel commandline. */ - if (debug_flags) { - if (slub_debug_slabs && - strncmp(slub_debug_slabs, name, strlen(slub_debug_slabs))) - goto out; - - /* - * Disable debugging that increases slab size if the minimum - * slab order would have increased as a result. - */ - if (disable_higher_order_debug && - get_order(objsize + DEBUG_SIZE) > get_order(objsize)) - debug_flags &= ~DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS; + if (slub_debug && (!slub_debug_slabs || + !strncmp(slub_debug_slabs, name, strlen(slub_debug_slabs)))) + flags |= slub_debug; - flags |= debug_flags; - } -out: return flags; } #else @@ -2488,6 +2474,18 @@ static int kmem_cache_open(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, if (!calculate_sizes(s, -1)) goto error; + if (disable_higher_order_debug) { + /* + * Disable debugging flags that store metadata if the min slab + * order increased. + */ + if (get_order(s->size) > get_order(s->objsize)) { + s->flags &= ~DEBUG_METADATA_FLAGS; + s->offset = 0; + if (!calculate_sizes(s, -1)) + goto error; + } + } /* * The larger the object size is, the more pages we want on the partial ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [patch] slub: use size and objsize orders to disable debug flags @ 2009-07-28 1:30 ` David Rientjes 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: David Rientjes @ 2009-07-28 1:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pekka Enberg Cc: Christoph Lameter, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg This patch moves the masking of debugging flags which increase a cache's min order due to metadata when `slub_debug=O' is used from kmem_cache_flags() to kmem_cache_open(). Instead of defining the maximum metadata size increase in a preprocessor macro, this approach uses the cache's ->size and ->objsize members to determine if the min order increased due to debugging options. If so, the flags specified in the more appropriately named DEBUG_METADATA_FLAGS are masked off. This approach was suggested by Christoph Lameter <cl-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>. Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> --- mm/slub.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c --- a/mm/slub.c +++ b/mm/slub.c @@ -142,11 +142,11 @@ SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER) /* - * Debugging flags that require metadata to be stored in the slab, up to - * DEBUG_SIZE in size. + * Debugging flags that require metadata to be stored in the slab. These get + * disabled when slub_debug=O is used and a cache's min order increases with + * metadata. */ -#define DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS (SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER) -#define DEBUG_SIZE (3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track)) +#define DEBUG_METADATA_FLAGS (SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER) /* * Set of flags that will prevent slab merging @@ -1040,27 +1040,13 @@ static unsigned long kmem_cache_flags(unsigned long objsize, unsigned long flags, const char *name, void (*ctor)(void *)) { - int debug_flags = slub_debug; - /* * Enable debugging if selected on the kernel commandline. */ - if (debug_flags) { - if (slub_debug_slabs && - strncmp(slub_debug_slabs, name, strlen(slub_debug_slabs))) - goto out; - - /* - * Disable debugging that increases slab size if the minimum - * slab order would have increased as a result. - */ - if (disable_higher_order_debug && - get_order(objsize + DEBUG_SIZE) > get_order(objsize)) - debug_flags &= ~DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS; + if (slub_debug && (!slub_debug_slabs || + !strncmp(slub_debug_slabs, name, strlen(slub_debug_slabs)))) + flags |= slub_debug; - flags |= debug_flags; - } -out: return flags; } #else @@ -2488,6 +2474,18 @@ static int kmem_cache_open(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, if (!calculate_sizes(s, -1)) goto error; + if (disable_higher_order_debug) { + /* + * Disable debugging flags that store metadata if the min slab + * order increased. + */ + if (get_order(s->size) > get_order(s->objsize)) { + s->flags &= ~DEBUG_METADATA_FLAGS; + s->offset = 0; + if (!calculate_sizes(s, -1)) + goto error; + } + } /* * The larger the object size is, the more pages we want on the partial ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] slub: use size and objsize orders to disable debug flags @ 2009-07-28 7:53 ` Pekka Enberg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-07-28 7:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Rientjes Cc: Christoph Lameter, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg David Rientjes wrote: > This patch moves the masking of debugging flags which increase a cache's > min order due to metadata when `slub_debug=O' is used from > kmem_cache_flags() to kmem_cache_open(). > > Instead of defining the maximum metadata size increase in a preprocessor > macro, this approach uses the cache's ->size and ->objsize members to > determine if the min order increased due to debugging options. If so, > the flags specified in the more appropriately named DEBUG_METADATA_FLAGS > are masked off. > > This approach was suggested by Christoph Lameter > <cl@linux-foundation.org>. > > Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> > Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Applied, thanks! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] slub: use size and objsize orders to disable debug flags @ 2009-07-28 7:53 ` Pekka Enberg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-07-28 7:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Rientjes Cc: Christoph Lameter, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg David Rientjes wrote: > This patch moves the masking of debugging flags which increase a cache's > min order due to metadata when `slub_debug=O' is used from > kmem_cache_flags() to kmem_cache_open(). > > Instead of defining the maximum metadata size increase in a preprocessor > macro, this approach uses the cache's ->size and ->objsize members to > determine if the min order increased due to debugging options. If so, > the flags specified in the more appropriately named DEBUG_METADATA_FLAGS > are masked off. > > This approach was suggested by Christoph Lameter > <cl-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>. > > Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> > Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Applied, thanks! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] slub: use size and objsize orders to disable debug flags @ 2009-08-03 14:56 ` Christoph Lameter 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Christoph Lameter @ 2009-08-03 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Rientjes Cc: Pekka Enberg, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, David Rientjes wrote: > @@ -2488,6 +2474,18 @@ static int kmem_cache_open(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, > > if (!calculate_sizes(s, -1)) > goto error; > + if (disable_higher_order_debug) { > + /* > + * Disable debugging flags that store metadata if the min slab > + * order increased. > + */ > + if (get_order(s->size) > get_order(s->objsize)) { > + s->flags &= ~DEBUG_METADATA_FLAGS; > + s->offset = 0; Hmmm... Move this line into calculate_sizes()? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] slub: use size and objsize orders to disable debug flags @ 2009-08-03 14:56 ` Christoph Lameter 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Christoph Lameter @ 2009-08-03 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Rientjes Cc: Pekka Enberg, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, David Rientjes wrote: > @@ -2488,6 +2474,18 @@ static int kmem_cache_open(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, > > if (!calculate_sizes(s, -1)) > goto error; > + if (disable_higher_order_debug) { > + /* > + * Disable debugging flags that store metadata if the min slab > + * order increased. > + */ > + if (get_order(s->size) > get_order(s->objsize)) { > + s->flags &= ~DEBUG_METADATA_FLAGS; > + s->offset = 0; Hmmm... Move this line into calculate_sizes()? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13341] Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, patrick, Rusty Russell This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13341 Subject : Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules Submitter : <patrick@ostenberg.de> Date : 2009-05-19 09:08 (69 days old) Handled-By : Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13341] Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, patrick-nxAOmsU53hB6lmGzAMPh1A, Rusty Russell This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13341 Subject : Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules Submitter : <patrick-nxAOmsU53hB6lmGzAMPh1A@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-05-19 09:08 (69 days old) Handled-By : Rusty Russell <rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13318] AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Jerome Glisse, Karsten Mehrhoff, Michel Dänzer, Shaohua Li This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13318 Subject : AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2 Submitter : Karsten Mehrhoff <kawime@gmx.de> Date : 2009-04-30 8:51 (88 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=59de2bebabc5027f93df999d59cc65df591c3e6e References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124108156417560&w=4 Handled-By : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13318] AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2 @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Jerome Glisse, Karsten Mehrhoff, Michel Dänzer, Shaohua Li This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13318 Subject : AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2 Submitter : Karsten Mehrhoff <kawime-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-04-30 8:51 (88 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=59de2bebabc5027f93df999d59cc65df591c3e6e References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124108156417560&w=4 Handled-By : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13219] Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.4 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (4 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, David Hill This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13219 Subject : Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.4 Submitter : David Hill <hilld@binarystorm.net> Date : 2009-05-01 16:57 (87 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Tomas Janousek This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13337 Subject : [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules Submitter : Tomas Janousek <tomi@nomi.cz> Date : 2009-05-18 10:59 (70 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Tomas Janousek This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13337 Subject : [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules Submitter : Tomas Janousek <tomi-YoqI/XImC7s@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-05-18 10:59 (70 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13306] hibernate slow on _second_ run 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13306 Subject : hibernate slow on _second_ run Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Date : 2009-05-14 09:34 (74 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13306] hibernate slow on _second_ run @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13306 Subject : hibernate slow on _second_ run Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-05-14 09:34 (74 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13306] hibernate slow on _second_ run 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 8:16 ` Johannes Berg -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Johannes Berg @ 2009-07-27 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 428 bytes --] On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 22:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). The problem persists in 31-rc3. johannes [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13306] hibernate slow on _second_ run @ 2009-07-27 8:16 ` Johannes Berg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Johannes Berg @ 2009-07-27 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 428 bytes --] On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 22:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). The problem persists in 31-rc3. johannes [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug 13306] hibernate slow on _second_ run 2009-07-27 8:16 ` Johannes Berg (?) @ 2009-07-27 21:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Johannes Berg Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, bugzilla-daemon On Monday 27 July 2009, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 22:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > The problem persists in 31-rc3. Thanks for the update. Unfortunately, I have no idea about what's wrong here. Generally, there are three possible areas the problem may be related to: (1) interrupts, (2) CPU hotplug, (3) ordering of the platform callbacks, but I can't say much more than that. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13328] b44: eth0: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 00000002 of register 42c to clear. 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (7 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Francis Moreau, netdev This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13328 Subject : b44: eth0: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 00000002 of register 42c to clear. Submitter : Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com> Date : 2009-05-03 16:22 (85 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124136778012280&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13351] 2.6.30 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar, unggnu, Yinghai Lu This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13351 Subject : 2.6.30 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk Submitter : <unggnu@googlemail.com> Date : 2009-05-20 14:09 (68 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=78a8b35bc7abf8b8333d6f625e08c0f7cc1c3742 Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13351] 2.6.30 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar, unggnu-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg, Yinghai Lu This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13351 Subject : 2.6.30 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk Submitter : <unggnu-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-05-20 14:09 (68 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=78a8b35bc7abf8b8333d6f625e08c0f7cc1c3742 Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13389] Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Frans Pop This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389 Subject : Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2009-05-26 15:24 (62 days old) Handled-By : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13389] Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Frans Pop This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389 Subject : Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-05-26 15:24 (62 days old) Handled-By : Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13389] Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 1:22 ` Frans Pop -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Frans Pop @ 2009-07-27 1:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Len Brown, rui.zhang On Sunday 26 July 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389 > Subject : Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed > when it should not be > Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671 > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672 Rui has acked the patches [1], but AFAIK Len has not yet picked them up. [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/7/474 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13389] Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be @ 2009-07-27 1:22 ` Frans Pop 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Frans Pop @ 2009-07-27 1:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Len Brown, rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w On Sunday 26 July 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389 > Subject : Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed > when it should not be > Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671 > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672 Rui has acked the patches [1], but AFAIK Len has not yet picked them up. [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/7/474 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <200907270322.47523.elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #13389] Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be 2009-07-27 1:22 ` Frans Pop @ 2009-07-27 21:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Frans Pop Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, ACPI Devel Maling List, Len Brown On Monday 27 July 2009, Frans Pop wrote: > On Sunday 26 July 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389 > > Subject : Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed > > when it should not be > > Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671 > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672 > > Rui has acked the patches [1], but AFAIK Len has not yet picked them up. > > [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/7/474 No, Len hasn't picked them up, but he's not been responsive recently in general. Best, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13389] Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be @ 2009-07-27 21:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Frans Pop Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, rui.zhang, ACPI Devel Maling List, Len Brown On Monday 27 July 2009, Frans Pop wrote: > On Sunday 26 July 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389 > > Subject : Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed > > when it should not be > > Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671 > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672 > > Rui has acked the patches [1], but AFAIK Len has not yet picked them up. > > [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/7/474 No, Len hasn't picked them up, but he's not been responsive recently in general. Best, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alejandro Riveira, Chris Wright, Johannes Berg, John W. Linville This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362 Subject : rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap Submitter : Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com> Date : 2009-05-22 13:32 (66 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alejandro Riveira, Chris Wright, Johannes Berg, John W. Linville This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362 Subject : rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap Submitter : Alejandro Riveira <ariveira-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-05-22 13:32 (66 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-02 13:45 ` Alejandro Riveira Fernández -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Alejandro Riveira Fernández @ 2009-08-02 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Chris Wright, Johannes Berg, John W. Linville El Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:45:27 +0200 (CEST) "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> escribió: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). Sorry for the delay i did not have the time to test 2.6.31-rc* until now. Tried 2.6.31-rc5 the problem persist. The revert still fixes the issue; so the bug should be still present. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362 > Subject : rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap > Submitter : Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com> > Date : 2009-05-22 13:32 (66 days old) > > Thanks; Alejandro ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap @ 2009-08-02 13:45 ` Alejandro Riveira Fernández 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Alejandro Riveira Fernández @ 2009-08-02 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Chris Wright, Johannes Berg, John W. Linville El Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:45:27 +0200 (CEST) "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> escribió: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). Sorry for the delay i did not have the time to test 2.6.31-rc* until now. Tried 2.6.31-rc5 the problem persist. The revert still fixes the issue; so the bug should be still present. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362 > Subject : rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap > Submitter : Alejandro Riveira <ariveira-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2009-05-22 13:32 (66 days old) > > Thanks; Alejandro ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap 2009-08-02 13:45 ` Alejandro Riveira Fernández @ 2009-08-02 20:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-02 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alejandro Riveira Fernández Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Chris Wright, Johannes Berg, John W. Linville On Sunday 02 August 2009, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote: > El Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:45:27 +0200 (CEST) > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> escribió: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > Sorry for the delay i did not have the time to test 2.6.31-rc* until now. > Tried 2.6.31-rc5 the problem persist. The revert still fixes the issue; so > the bug should be still present. > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362 > > Subject : rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap > > Submitter : Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com> > > Date : 2009-05-22 13:32 (66 days old) Thanks for the update. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap @ 2009-08-02 20:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-02 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alejandro Riveira Fernández Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Chris Wright, Johannes Berg, John W. Linville On Sunday 02 August 2009, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote: > El Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:45:27 +0200 (CEST) > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> escribió: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > Sorry for the delay i did not have the time to test 2.6.31-rc* until now. > Tried 2.6.31-rc5 the problem persist. The revert still fixes the issue; so > the bug should be still present. > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362 > > Subject : rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap > > Submitter : Alejandro Riveira <ariveira-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2009-05-22 13:32 (66 days old) Thanks for the update. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13373] fbcon, intelfb, i915: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Miles Lane This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13373 Subject : fbcon, intelfb, i915: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> Date : 2009-05-23 5:08 (65 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124305538130702&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13373] fbcon, intelfb, i915: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Miles Lane This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13373 Subject : fbcon, intelfb, i915: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-05-23 5:08 (65 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124305538130702&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13401] pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected) 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jens Axboe, Laurent Riffard This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13401 Subject : pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected) Submitter : Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@free.fr> Date : 2009-05-28 18:43 (60 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13401] pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected) @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jens Axboe, Laurent Riffard This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13401 Subject : pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected) Submitter : Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-05-28 18:43 (60 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13374] reiserfs blocked for more than 120secs 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (13 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Harald Dunkel This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13374 Subject : reiserfs blocked for more than 120secs Submitter : Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@t-online.de> Date : 2009-05-23 8:52 (65 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124306880410811&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/29/389 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13407] adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Jan Scholz, Rafael J. Wysocki This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13407 Subject : adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram Submitter : Jan Scholz <scholz@fias.uni-frankfurt.de> Date : 2009-05-28 7:59 (60 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ed8d2b3a81bdbb0418301628ccdb008ac9f40b7 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124349762314976&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13407] adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Jan Scholz, Rafael J. Wysocki This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13407 Subject : adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram Submitter : Jan Scholz <scholz-wOpdxP1gw6Cc+IqHO83+wjjhTm2NLCe8@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-05-28 7:59 (60 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ed8d2b3a81bdbb0418301628ccdb008ac9f40b7 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124349762314976&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13407] adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-28 14:49 ` Jan Scholz -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Jan Scholz @ 2009-07-28 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Jan Scholz Hi, The bug is still present in v2.6.31-rc4, it is fixed by commenting out {suspend,resume}_device_irqs() in drivers/base/power/main.c as suggested by Rafael. Any success in reproducing it? Regards, Jan "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13407 > Subject : adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram > Submitter : Jan Scholz <scholz@fias.uni-frankfurt.de> > Date : 2009-05-28 7:59 (60 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ed8d2b3a81bdbb0418301628ccdb008ac9f40b7 > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124349762314976&w=4 > Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> > > > -- Jan Scholz ____ ____ __ ___ ( ___)(_ _) /__\ / __) Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies )__) _)(_ /(__)\ \__ \ (__) (____)(__)(__)(___/ Goethe Universitaet Frankfurt Ruth-Moufang-Str. 1 Tel. 069-798-47534 60438 Frankfurt am Main ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13407] adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram @ 2009-07-28 14:49 ` Jan Scholz 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Jan Scholz @ 2009-07-28 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Jan Scholz Hi, The bug is still present in v2.6.31-rc4, it is fixed by commenting out {suspend,resume}_device_irqs() in drivers/base/power/main.c as suggested by Rafael. Any success in reproducing it? Regards, Jan "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> writes: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13407 > Subject : adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram > Submitter : Jan Scholz <scholz-wOpdxP1gw6Cc+IqHO83+wjjhTm2NLCe8@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2009-05-28 7:59 (60 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ed8d2b3a81bdbb0418301628ccdb008ac9f40b7 > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124349762314976&w=4 > Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> > > > -- Jan Scholz ____ ____ __ ___ ( ___)(_ _) /__\ / __) Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies )__) _)(_ /(__)\ \__ \ (__) (____)(__)(__)(___/ Goethe Universitaet Frankfurt Ruth-Moufang-Str. 1 Tel. 069-798-47534 60438 Frankfurt am Main ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13424] possible deadlock when doing governor switching 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Mathieu Desnoyers, Shaohua Li This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13424 Subject : possible deadlock when doing governor switching Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Date : 2009-05-31 16:36 (57 days old) References : http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg00711.html http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/28/405 Handled-By : Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13424] possible deadlock when doing governor switching @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Mathieu Desnoyers, Shaohua Li This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13424 Subject : possible deadlock when doing governor switching Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-05-31 16:36 (57 days old) References : http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg00711.html http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/28/405 Handled-By : Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers-scC8bbJcJLCw5LPnMra/2Q@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13424] possible deadlock when doing governor switching 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 16:48 ` Mathieu Desnoyers -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2009-07-27 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Shaohua Li It should be fixed now by recents commits to the cpufreq tree, which got into mainline: 42a06f2166f2f6f7bf04f32b4e823eacdceafdc9 b253d2b2d28ead6fed012feb54694b3d0562839a b14893a62c73af0eca414cfed505b8c09efc613c 7d26e2d5e2da37e92c6c7644b26b294dedd8c982 37c90e8887efd218dc4af949b7f498ca2da4af9f 5a75c82828e7c088ca6e7b4827911dc29cc8e774 ee88415caf736b89500f16e0a545614541a45005 3f4a782b5ce2698b1870b5a7b573cd721d4fce33 5e1596f75395e7a402e1059c518e633d2732dcf8 Mathieu * Rafael J. Wysocki (rjw@sisk.pl) wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13424 > Subject : possible deadlock when doing governor switching > Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> > Date : 2009-05-31 16:36 (57 days old) > References : http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg00711.html > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/28/405 > Handled-By : Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> > > > -- Mathieu Desnoyers OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13424] possible deadlock when doing governor switching @ 2009-07-27 16:48 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2009-07-27 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Shaohua Li It should be fixed now by recents commits to the cpufreq tree, which got into mainline: 42a06f2166f2f6f7bf04f32b4e823eacdceafdc9 b253d2b2d28ead6fed012feb54694b3d0562839a b14893a62c73af0eca414cfed505b8c09efc613c 7d26e2d5e2da37e92c6c7644b26b294dedd8c982 37c90e8887efd218dc4af949b7f498ca2da4af9f 5a75c82828e7c088ca6e7b4827911dc29cc8e774 ee88415caf736b89500f16e0a545614541a45005 3f4a782b5ce2698b1870b5a7b573cd721d4fce33 5e1596f75395e7a402e1059c518e633d2732dcf8 Mathieu * Rafael J. Wysocki (rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org) wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13424 > Subject : possible deadlock when doing governor switching > Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2009-05-31 16:36 (57 days old) > References : http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg00711.html > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/28/405 > Handled-By : Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers-scC8bbJcJLCw5LPnMra/2Q@public.gmane.org> > > > -- Mathieu Desnoyers OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13424] possible deadlock when doing governor switching 2009-07-27 16:48 ` Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2009-07-27 21:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 21:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Shaohua Li On Monday 27 July 2009, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > It should be fixed now by recents commits to the cpufreq tree, which got > into mainline: > > 42a06f2166f2f6f7bf04f32b4e823eacdceafdc9 > b253d2b2d28ead6fed012feb54694b3d0562839a > b14893a62c73af0eca414cfed505b8c09efc613c > 7d26e2d5e2da37e92c6c7644b26b294dedd8c982 > 37c90e8887efd218dc4af949b7f498ca2da4af9f > 5a75c82828e7c088ca6e7b4827911dc29cc8e774 > ee88415caf736b89500f16e0a545614541a45005 > 3f4a782b5ce2698b1870b5a7b573cd721d4fce33 > 5e1596f75395e7a402e1059c518e633d2732dcf8 Thanks, closed. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13424] possible deadlock when doing governor switching @ 2009-07-27 21:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 21:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Shaohua Li On Monday 27 July 2009, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > It should be fixed now by recents commits to the cpufreq tree, which got > into mainline: > > 42a06f2166f2f6f7bf04f32b4e823eacdceafdc9 > b253d2b2d28ead6fed012feb54694b3d0562839a > b14893a62c73af0eca414cfed505b8c09efc613c > 7d26e2d5e2da37e92c6c7644b26b294dedd8c982 > 37c90e8887efd218dc4af949b7f498ca2da4af9f > 5a75c82828e7c088ca6e7b4827911dc29cc8e774 > ee88415caf736b89500f16e0a545614541a45005 > 3f4a782b5ce2698b1870b5a7b573cd721d4fce33 > 5e1596f75395e7a402e1059c518e633d2732dcf8 Thanks, closed. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13408] Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (16 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton, Diego Calleja This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13408 Subject : Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7 Submitter : Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com> Date : 2009-05-30 18:51 (58 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/30/146 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13471] Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, ACPI Devel Maling List, Ozan Çağlayan This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13471 Subject : Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled Submitter : Ozan Çağlayan <ozan-caicS1wCkhO6A22drWdTBw@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-04 9:12 (53 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124410667532558&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13471] Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, ACPI Devel Maling List, Ozan Çağlayan This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13471 Subject : Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled Submitter : Ozan Çağlayan <ozan@pardus.org.tr> Date : 2009-06-04 9:12 (53 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124410667532558&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13471] Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (?) @ 2009-07-31 14:14 ` Alan Cox [not found] ` <20090731151417.568094e5-qBU/x9rampVanCEyBjwyrvXRex20P6io@public.gmane.org> -1 siblings, 1 reply; 336+ messages in thread From: Alan Cox @ 2009-07-31 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, ACPI Devel Maling List, Ozan Çağlayan On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:45:29 +0200 (CEST) "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). Ozan - can you confirm it broke between 2.6.29 (ie you tested 2.6.29), and 2.6.30-rc1. If so I have an idea what is going on Alan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20090731151417.568094e5-qBU/x9rampVanCEyBjwyrvXRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #13471] Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled 2009-07-31 14:14 ` Alan Cox [not found] ` <20090731151417.568094e5-qBU/x9rampVanCEyBjwyrvXRex20P6io@public.gmane.org> @ 2009-07-31 15:08 ` Ozan Çağlayan 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Ozan Çağlayan @ 2009-07-31 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alan Cox Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, ACPI Devel Maling List Alan Cox wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:45:29 +0200 (CEST) > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report >> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. >> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should >> be listed and let me know (either way). >> > > > Ozan - can you confirm it broke between 2.6.29 (ie you tested 2.6.29), > and 2.6.30-rc1. If so I have an idea what is going on > >From my last comment on bugzilla.kernel.org: "I tried with 2.6.30.1 but the problem still persists. I really don't have time to bisect it, but I can help with any other debugging outputs. I also started think that my board could somehow be faulty as no other people complains about a similar issue. Finally, it seems that the problem is available with 2.6.28, so the starting point is still fuzzy to me. I remember that the keyboard was working OK with 2.6.29_rc7 but now it's not. Maybe we should drop this report from the regression list." Monday I'll have access to the computer. I'll build and try to find the last working version. Meanwhile, I'd like to hear about your possible finding. Thanks, ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13471] Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled @ 2009-07-31 15:08 ` Ozan Çağlayan 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Ozan Çağlayan @ 2009-07-31 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alan Cox Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, ACPI Devel Maling List Alan Cox wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:45:29 +0200 (CEST) > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report >> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. >> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should >> be listed and let me know (either way). >> > > > Ozan - can you confirm it broke between 2.6.29 (ie you tested 2.6.29), > and 2.6.30-rc1. If so I have an idea what is going on > From my last comment on bugzilla.kernel.org: "I tried with 2.6.30.1 but the problem still persists. I really don't have time to bisect it, but I can help with any other debugging outputs. I also started think that my board could somehow be faulty as no other people complains about a similar issue. Finally, it seems that the problem is available with 2.6.28, so the starting point is still fuzzy to me. I remember that the keyboard was working OK with 2.6.29_rc7 but now it's not. Maybe we should drop this report from the regression list." Monday I'll have access to the computer. I'll build and try to find the last working version. Meanwhile, I'd like to hear about your possible finding. Thanks, ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13471] Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled @ 2009-07-31 15:08 ` Ozan Çağlayan 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Ozan Çağlayan @ 2009-07-31 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alan Cox Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, ACPI Devel Maling List Alan Cox wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:45:29 +0200 (CEST) > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report >> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. >> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should >> be listed and let me know (either way). >> > > > Ozan - can you confirm it broke between 2.6.29 (ie you tested 2.6.29), > and 2.6.30-rc1. If so I have an idea what is going on > >From my last comment on bugzilla.kernel.org: "I tried with 2.6.30.1 but the problem still persists. I really don't have time to bisect it, but I can help with any other debugging outputs. I also started think that my board could somehow be faulty as no other people complains about a similar issue. Finally, it seems that the problem is available with 2.6.28, so the starting point is still fuzzy to me. I remember that the keyboard was working OK with 2.6.29_rc7 but now it's not. Maybe we should drop this report from the regression list." Monday I'll have access to the computer. I'll build and try to find the last working version. Meanwhile, I'd like to hear about your possible finding. Thanks, ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13471] Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled 2009-07-31 15:08 ` Ozan Çağlayan (?) (?) @ 2009-07-31 15:17 ` Alan Cox [not found] ` <20090731161735.6a94ad9c-qBU/x9rampVanCEyBjwyrvXRex20P6io@public.gmane.org> -1 siblings, 1 reply; 336+ messages in thread From: Alan Cox @ 2009-07-31 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ozan Çağlayan Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, ACPI Devel Maling List O> Finally, it seems that the problem is available with 2.6.28, so the starting > point is still fuzzy to me. I remember that the keyboard was working OK with > 2.6.29_rc7 but now it's not. > > Maybe we should drop this report from the regression list." > > > Monday I'll have access to the computer. I'll build and try to find the last working version. > Meanwhile, I'd like to hear about your possible finding. There have been few changes to parport_pc but one thing recent changed the probe for SuperIO chips via low addresses and that could be interfering. commit e2434dc1c19412639dd047a4d4eff8ed0e5d0d50 Author: Jens Rottmann <JRottmann@LiPPERTEmbedded.de> Date: Mon Jun 22 16:51:49 2009 +0100 changed the behaviour slightly (hence asking about which release if it was a recent breakage). Its also a code area with very few changes so if you can find which one worked last, you should be able to transplant that parport_pc into 2.6.current and see if its parport or acpi triggered breakage. Alan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20090731161735.6a94ad9c-qBU/x9rampVanCEyBjwyrvXRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #13471] Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled 2009-07-31 15:17 ` Alan Cox @ 2009-08-04 11:33 ` Ozan Çağlayan 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Ozan Çağlayan @ 2009-08-04 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alan Cox Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, ACPI Devel Maling List Alan Cox wrote On 31-07-2009 18:17: > There have been few changes to parport_pc but one thing recent changed > the probe for SuperIO chips via low addresses and that could be > interfering. > > commit e2434dc1c19412639dd047a4d4eff8ed0e5d0d50 > Author: Jens Rottmann <JRottmann-pZAVvlj+WpoXz/+GnIZSFIQuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org> > Date: Mon Jun 22 16:51:49 2009 +0100 > > changed the behaviour slightly (hence asking about which release if it > was a recent breakage). Its also a code area with very few changes so if > you can find which one worked last, you should be able to transplant that > parport_pc into 2.6.current and see if its parport or acpi triggered > breakage. > I've tested on 2.6.30.4 which has apparently this commit, no changes. I've booted into Ubuntu 8.10 which has 2.6.28. The keyboard was working correctly eventhough parport_pc was loaded. I removed and re-probed and the keyboard is gone. I've set BIOS settings to default, nope. I'll try bisecting when I find the last-good/first-bad kernel version. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13471] Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled @ 2009-08-04 11:33 ` Ozan Çağlayan 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Ozan Çağlayan @ 2009-08-04 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alan Cox Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, ACPI Devel Maling List Alan Cox wrote On 31-07-2009 18:17: > There have been few changes to parport_pc but one thing recent changed > the probe for SuperIO chips via low addresses and that could be > interfering. > > commit e2434dc1c19412639dd047a4d4eff8ed0e5d0d50 > Author: Jens Rottmann <JRottmann@LiPPERTEmbedded.de> > Date: Mon Jun 22 16:51:49 2009 +0100 > > changed the behaviour slightly (hence asking about which release if it > was a recent breakage). Its also a code area with very few changes so if > you can find which one worked last, you should be able to transplant that > parport_pc into 2.6.current and see if its parport or acpi triggered > breakage. > I've tested on 2.6.30.4 which has apparently this commit, no changes. I've booted into Ubuntu 8.10 which has 2.6.28. The keyboard was working correctly eventhough parport_pc was loaded. I removed and re-probed and the keyboard is gone. I've set BIOS settings to default, nope. I'll try bisecting when I find the last-good/first-bad kernel version. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13554] linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jesse Barnes, Jos van Wolput This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13554 Subject : linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window Submitter : Jos van Wolput <wolput@onsneteindhoven.nl> Date : 2009-06-17 06:28 (40 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124686965407853&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13554] linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jesse Barnes, Jos van Wolput This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13554 Subject : linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window Submitter : Jos van Wolput <wolput-kN7GrHn7egj0B9fh5IxImPP6llvjuJOh@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-17 06:28 (40 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124686965407853&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13472] Oops with minicom and USB serial 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (19 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-07-27 14:40 ` Alan Stern -1 siblings, 1 reply; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern, Peter Chubb This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13472 Subject : Oops with minicom and USB serial Submitter : Peter Chubb <peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au> Date : 2009-06-05 1:37 (52 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124416901026700&w=4 Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13472] Oops with minicom and USB serial 2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13472] Oops with minicom and USB serial Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 14:40 ` Alan Stern 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Alan Stern @ 2009-07-27 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Peter Chubb On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13472 > Subject : Oops with minicom and USB serial > Submitter : Peter Chubb <peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au> > Date : 2009-06-05 1:37 (52 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124416901026700&w=4 > Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> This bug has been fixed in 2.6.30.stable by commit b6cd9d132aa5e2ef0abdd1d5171e45dad9aafc29. Alan Stern ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13472] Oops with minicom and USB serial @ 2009-07-27 14:40 ` Alan Stern 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Alan Stern @ 2009-07-27 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Peter Chubb On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13472 > Subject : Oops with minicom and USB serial > Submitter : Peter Chubb <peterc-M3ycANVxPotyL3EAZA59ERCuuivNXqWP@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2009-06-05 1:37 (52 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124416901026700&w=4 > Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org> This bug has been fixed in 2.6.30.stable by commit b6cd9d132aa5e2ef0abdd1d5171e45dad9aafc29. Alan Stern ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13472] Oops with minicom and USB serial 2009-07-27 14:40 ` Alan Stern (?) @ 2009-07-27 21:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alan Stern; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Peter Chubb On Monday 27 July 2009, Alan Stern wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13472 > > Subject : Oops with minicom and USB serial > > Submitter : Peter Chubb <peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au> > > Date : 2009-06-05 1:37 (52 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124416901026700&w=4 > > Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> > > This bug has been fixed in 2.6.30.stable by commit > b6cd9d132aa5e2ef0abdd1d5171e45dad9aafc29. Thanks, closed. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13502] GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, sveina This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13502 Subject : GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1 Submitter : <sveina@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-10 20:04 (47 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13502] GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1 @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, sveina-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13502 Subject : GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1 Submitter : <sveina-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-10 20:04 (47 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13514] acer_wmi causes stack corruption 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Rus This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13514 Subject : acer_wmi causes stack corruption Submitter : Rus <harbour@sfinx.od.ua> Date : 2009-06-12 08:13 (45 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13514] acer_wmi causes stack corruption @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Rus This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13514 Subject : acer_wmi causes stack corruption Submitter : Rus <harbour-K87ZgELTUEPsG83rWm+8vg@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-12 08:13 (45 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13518] slab grows with NFS write activity. 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrew Randrianasulu, Linus Torvalds This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13518 Subject : slab grows with NFS write activity. Submitter : Andrew Randrianasulu <randrik@mail.ru> Date : 2009-06-12 09:51 (45 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13518] slab grows with NFS write activity. @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrew Randrianasulu, Linus Torvalds This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13518 Subject : slab grows with NFS write activity. Submitter : Andrew Randrianasulu <randrik-JGs/UdohzUI@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-12 09:51 (45 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13475] suspend/hibernate lockdep warning 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Young, Mathieu Desnoyers This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13475 Subject : suspend/hibernate lockdep warning Submitter : Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-02 10:00 (55 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124393723321241&w=4 Handled-By : Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/28660/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13475] suspend/hibernate lockdep warning @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Young, Mathieu Desnoyers This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13475 Subject : suspend/hibernate lockdep warning Submitter : Dave Young <hidave.darkstar-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-02 10:00 (55 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124393723321241&w=4 Handled-By : Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers-scC8bbJcJLCw5LPnMra/2Q@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/28660/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13475] suspend/hibernate lockdep warning 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 1:59 ` Dave Young -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Dave Young @ 2009-07-27 1:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Mathieu Desnoyers On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). It has been fixed, at least I did not see it in recent rc4 kernel. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13475 > Subject : suspend/hibernate lockdep warning > Submitter : Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> > Date : 2009-06-02 10:00 (55 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124393723321241&w=4 > Handled-By : Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/28660/ > > > -- Regards dave ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13475] suspend/hibernate lockdep warning @ 2009-07-27 1:59 ` Dave Young 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Dave Young @ 2009-07-27 1:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Mathieu Desnoyers On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). It has been fixed, at least I did not see it in recent rc4 kernel. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13475 > Subject : suspend/hibernate lockdep warning > Submitter : Dave Young <hidave.darkstar-Re5JQEeQqe8@public.gmane.orgm> > Date : 2009-06-02 10:00 (55 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124393723321241&w=4 > Handled-By : Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/28660/ > > > -- Regards dave ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13475] suspend/hibernate lockdep warning 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 16:52 ` Mathieu Desnoyers -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2009-07-27 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Dave Young It should be fixed now by recents commits to the cpufreq tree, which got into mainline: 42a06f2166f2f6f7bf04f32b4e823eacdceafdc9 b253d2b2d28ead6fed012feb54694b3d0562839a b14893a62c73af0eca414cfed505b8c09efc613c 7d26e2d5e2da37e92c6c7644b26b294dedd8c982 37c90e8887efd218dc4af949b7f498ca2da4af9f 5a75c82828e7c088ca6e7b4827911dc29cc8e774 ee88415caf736b89500f16e0a545614541a45005 3f4a782b5ce2698b1870b5a7b573cd721d4fce33 5e1596f75395e7a402e1059c518e633d2732dcf8 Mathieu * Rafael J. Wysocki (rjw@sisk.pl) wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13475 > Subject : suspend/hibernate lockdep warning > Submitter : Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> > Date : 2009-06-02 10:00 (55 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124393723321241&w=4 > Handled-By : Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/28660/ > > > -- Mathieu Desnoyers OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13475] suspend/hibernate lockdep warning @ 2009-07-27 16:52 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2009-07-27 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Dave Young It should be fixed now by recents commits to the cpufreq tree, which got into mainline: 42a06f2166f2f6f7bf04f32b4e823eacdceafdc9 b253d2b2d28ead6fed012feb54694b3d0562839a b14893a62c73af0eca414cfed505b8c09efc613c 7d26e2d5e2da37e92c6c7644b26b294dedd8c982 37c90e8887efd218dc4af949b7f498ca2da4af9f 5a75c82828e7c088ca6e7b4827911dc29cc8e774 ee88415caf736b89500f16e0a545614541a45005 3f4a782b5ce2698b1870b5a7b573cd721d4fce33 5e1596f75395e7a402e1059c518e633d2732dcf8 Mathieu * Rafael J. Wysocki (rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org) wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13475 > Subject : suspend/hibernate lockdep warning > Submitter : Dave Young <hidave.darkstar-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2009-06-02 10:00 (55 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124393723321241&w=4 > Handled-By : Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers-scC8bbJcJLCw5LPnMra/2Q@public.gmane.org> > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/28660/ > > > -- Mathieu Desnoyers OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13475] suspend/hibernate lockdep warning 2009-07-27 16:52 ` Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2009-07-27 21:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Dave Young On Monday 27 July 2009, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > It should be fixed now by recents commits to the cpufreq tree, which got > into mainline: > > 42a06f2166f2f6f7bf04f32b4e823eacdceafdc9 > b253d2b2d28ead6fed012feb54694b3d0562839a > b14893a62c73af0eca414cfed505b8c09efc613c > 7d26e2d5e2da37e92c6c7644b26b294dedd8c982 > 37c90e8887efd218dc4af949b7f498ca2da4af9f > 5a75c82828e7c088ca6e7b4827911dc29cc8e774 > ee88415caf736b89500f16e0a545614541a45005 > 3f4a782b5ce2698b1870b5a7b573cd721d4fce33 > 5e1596f75395e7a402e1059c518e633d2732dcf8 Thanks, closed. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13475] suspend/hibernate lockdep warning @ 2009-07-27 21:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Dave Young On Monday 27 July 2009, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > It should be fixed now by recents commits to the cpufreq tree, which got > into mainline: > > 42a06f2166f2f6f7bf04f32b4e823eacdceafdc9 > b253d2b2d28ead6fed012feb54694b3d0562839a > b14893a62c73af0eca414cfed505b8c09efc613c > 7d26e2d5e2da37e92c6c7644b26b294dedd8c982 > 37c90e8887efd218dc4af949b7f498ca2da4af9f > 5a75c82828e7c088ca6e7b4827911dc29cc8e774 > ee88415caf736b89500f16e0a545614541a45005 > 3f4a782b5ce2698b1870b5a7b573cd721d4fce33 > 5e1596f75395e7a402e1059c518e633d2732dcf8 Thanks, closed. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13512] D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Daniel Smolik, Rafael J. Wysocki This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13512 Subject : D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore Submitter : Daniel Smolik <marvin@mydatex.cz> Date : 2009-06-11 20:12 (46 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13512] D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Daniel Smolik, Rafael J. Wysocki This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13512 Subject : D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore Submitter : Daniel Smolik <marvin-0pWKB23IDFjrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-11 20:12 (46 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13564] random general protection fault at boot time caused by khubd. 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (25 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Pauli This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13564 Subject : random general protection fault at boot time caused by khubd. Submitter : Pauli <suokkos@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-18 12:44 (39 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13620] acpi_enforce_resources broken - conflicting i2c module loaded on some EeePCs 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (26 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Jenkins, Bob Moore This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13620 Subject : acpi_enforce_resources broken - conflicting i2c module loaded on some EeePCs Submitter : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk> Date : 2009-06-25 08:31 (32 days old) References : <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-eeepc-devel/2009-June/002316.html> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13583] pdflush uses 5% CPU on otherwise idle system 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (27 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Paul Martin This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13583 Subject : pdflush uses 5% CPU on otherwise idle system Submitter : Paul Martin <pm@debian.org> Date : 2009-06-19 13:33 (38 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13558] Tracelog during resume 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13558 Subject : Tracelog during resume Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz> Date : 2009-06-17 11:32 (40 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13558] Tracelog during resume @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13558 Subject : Tracelog during resume Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml-VIXq6x/3rUk@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-17 11:32 (40 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13581] ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (29 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Matteo This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13581 Subject : ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels Submitter : Matteo <rootkit85@yahoo.it> Date : 2009-06-19 12:04 (38 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13638] rt2870 driver is broken for (some) cards 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (30 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, jakob gruber This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13638 Subject : rt2870 driver is broken for (some) cards Submitter : jakob gruber <jakob.gruber@kabelnet.at> Date : 2009-06-27 17:33 (30 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13634] [drm:drm_wait_vblank] *ERROR* failed to acquire vblank counter, -22 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13634 Subject : [drm:drm_wait_vblank] *ERROR* failed to acquire vblank counter, -22 Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz> Date : 2009-06-27 07:02 (30 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13634] [drm:drm_wait_vblank] *ERROR* failed to acquire vblank counter, -22 @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13634 Subject : [drm:drm_wait_vblank] *ERROR* failed to acquire vblank counter, -22 Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml-VIXq6x/3rUk@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-27 07:02 (30 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13624] usb: wrong autosuspend initialization 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern, list This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13624 Subject : usb: wrong autosuspend initialization Submitter : <list@phuk.ath.cx> Date : 2009-06-25 18:18 (32 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13624] usb: wrong autosuspend initialization @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern, list-2tUql6aCh3Vfq8cQ1yknNg This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13624 Subject : usb: wrong autosuspend initialization Submitter : <list-2tUql6aCh3Vfq8cQ1yknNg@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-25 18:18 (32 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13624] usb: wrong autosuspend initialization 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 14:42 ` Alan Stern -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Alan Stern @ 2009-07-27 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Oliver Neukum, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, list On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13624 > Subject : usb: wrong autosuspend initialization > Submitter : <list@phuk.ath.cx> > Date : 2009-06-25 18:18 (32 days old) There's some question as to whether this should be considered a kernel bug. The kernel isn't doing anything wrong; the problem is that various userspace programs enable autosuspend for devices that can't support it properly. Alan Stern ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13624] usb: wrong autosuspend initialization @ 2009-07-27 14:42 ` Alan Stern 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Alan Stern @ 2009-07-27 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Oliver Neukum, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, list-2tUql6aCh3Vfq8cQ1yknNg On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13624 > Subject : usb: wrong autosuspend initialization > Submitter : <list-2tUql6aCh3Vfq8cQ1yknNg@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2009-06-25 18:18 (32 days old) There's some question as to whether this should be considered a kernel bug. The kernel isn't doing anything wrong; the problem is that various userspace programs enable autosuspend for devices that can't support it properly. Alan Stern ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13624] usb: wrong autosuspend initialization @ 2009-07-27 14:44 ` list-2tUql6aCh3Vfq8cQ1yknNg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: list @ 2009-07-27 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alan Stern Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Oliver Neukum, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List Alan Stern wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report >> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. >> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should >> be listed and let me know (either way). >> >> >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13624 >> Subject : usb: wrong autosuspend initialization >> Submitter : <list@phuk.ath.cx> >> Date : 2009-06-25 18:18 (32 days old) > > There's some question as to whether this should be considered a kernel > bug. The kernel isn't doing anything wrong; the problem is that > various userspace programs enable autosuspend for devices that can't > support it properly. > > Alan Stern > I'm currently working on a patch for laptop_mode. The maintainer tells me there's work going on in the kernel to blacklist USB devices that don't implement autosuspend correctly (like mice turning their light off, etc...). Is that true? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13624] usb: wrong autosuspend initialization @ 2009-07-27 14:44 ` list-2tUql6aCh3Vfq8cQ1yknNg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: list-2tUql6aCh3Vfq8cQ1yknNg @ 2009-07-27 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alan Stern Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Oliver Neukum, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List Alan Stern wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report >> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. >> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should >> be listed and let me know (either way). >> >> >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13624 >> Subject : usb: wrong autosuspend initialization >> Submitter : <list-2tUql6aCh3Vfq8cQ1yknNg@public.gmane.org> >> Date : 2009-06-25 18:18 (32 days old) > > There's some question as to whether this should be considered a kernel > bug. The kernel isn't doing anything wrong; the problem is that > various userspace programs enable autosuspend for devices that can't > support it properly. > > Alan Stern > I'm currently working on a patch for laptop_mode. The maintainer tells me there's work going on in the kernel to blacklist USB devices that don't implement autosuspend correctly (like mice turning their light off, etc...). Is that true? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13624] usb: wrong autosuspend initialization @ 2009-07-27 15:09 ` Alan Stern 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Alan Stern @ 2009-07-27 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: list Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Oliver Neukum, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 list@phuk.ath.cx wrote: > Alan Stern wrote: > > On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > >> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > >> > >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > >> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > >> be listed and let me know (either way). > >> > >> > >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13624 > >> Subject : usb: wrong autosuspend initialization > >> Submitter : <list@phuk.ath.cx> > >> Date : 2009-06-25 18:18 (32 days old) > > > > There's some question as to whether this should be considered a kernel > > bug. The kernel isn't doing anything wrong; the problem is that > > various userspace programs enable autosuspend for devices that can't > > support it properly. > > > > Alan Stern > > > > I'm currently working on a patch for laptop_mode. The maintainer tells > me there's work going on in the kernel to blacklist USB devices that > don't implement autosuspend correctly (like mice turning their light > off, etc...). Is that true? No, it isn't. The kernel has no way to tell whether mice behave that way or not. The only suspend-related blacklisting in the kernel is concerned with broken devices that can't be resumed after they have been suspended. The kernel has to reset these devices instead of resuming them. Alan Stern ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13624] usb: wrong autosuspend initialization @ 2009-07-27 15:09 ` Alan Stern 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Alan Stern @ 2009-07-27 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: list-2tUql6aCh3Vfq8cQ1yknNg Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Oliver Neukum, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 list-2tUql6aCh3Vfq8cQ1yknNg@public.gmane.org wrote: > Alan Stern wrote: > > On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > >> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > >> > >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > >> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > >> be listed and let me know (either way). > >> > >> > >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13624 > >> Subject : usb: wrong autosuspend initialization > >> Submitter : <list-2tUql6aCh3Vfq8cQ1yknNg@public.gmane.org> > >> Date : 2009-06-25 18:18 (32 days old) > > > > There's some question as to whether this should be considered a kernel > > bug. The kernel isn't doing anything wrong; the problem is that > > various userspace programs enable autosuspend for devices that can't > > support it properly. > > > > Alan Stern > > > > I'm currently working on a patch for laptop_mode. The maintainer tells > me there's work going on in the kernel to blacklist USB devices that > don't implement autosuspend correctly (like mice turning their light > off, etc...). Is that true? No, it isn't. The kernel has no way to tell whether mice behave that way or not. The only suspend-related blacklisting in the kernel is concerned with broken devices that can't be resumed after they have been suspended. The kernel has to reset these devices instead of resuming them. Alan Stern ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13624] usb: wrong autosuspend initialization @ 2009-07-27 21:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alan Stern Cc: Oliver Neukum, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, list On Monday 27 July 2009, Alan Stern wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13624 > > Subject : usb: wrong autosuspend initialization > > Submitter : <list@phuk.ath.cx> > > Date : 2009-06-25 18:18 (32 days old) > > There's some question as to whether this should be considered a kernel > bug. The kernel isn't doing anything wrong; the problem is that > various userspace programs enable autosuspend for devices that can't > support it properly. OK, I'll drop it from the list of recent regressions. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13624] usb: wrong autosuspend initialization @ 2009-07-27 21:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alan Stern Cc: Oliver Neukum, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, list-2tUql6aCh3Vfq8cQ1yknNg On Monday 27 July 2009, Alan Stern wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13624 > > Subject : usb: wrong autosuspend initialization > > Submitter : <list-2tUql6aCh3Vfq8cQ1yknNg@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2009-06-25 18:18 (32 days old) > > There's some question as to whether this should be considered a kernel > bug. The kernel isn't doing anything wrong; the problem is that > various userspace programs enable autosuspend for devices that can't > support it properly. OK, I'll drop it from the list of recent regressions. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13621] xfs hangs with assertion failed 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (33 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Johannes Engel This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13621 Subject : xfs hangs with assertion failed Submitter : Johannes Engel <jcnengel@googlemail.com> Date : 2009-06-25 10:07 (32 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13646] warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (34 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Pavel Machek This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13646 Subject : warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2009-06-19 17:05 (38 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/19/187 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13660] Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (35 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Joao Correia This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13660 Subject : Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs Submitter : Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-27 16:07 (30 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/95 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13648] nfsd: page allocation failure 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, David Rientjes, Justin Piszcz, Stephan von Krawczynski This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13648 Subject : nfsd: page allocation failure Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com> Date : 2009-06-22 12:08 (35 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/22/309 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124748600712853&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13648] nfsd: page allocation failure @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, David Rientjes, Justin Piszcz, Stephan von Krawczynski This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13648 Subject : nfsd: page allocation failure Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz-BP4nVm5VUdNhbmWW9KSYcQ@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-22 12:08 (35 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/22/309 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124748600712853&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13648] nfsd: page allocation failure 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (?) @ 2009-07-27 11:04 ` Stephan von Krawczynski 2009-07-27 22:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-07-30 21:30 ` David Rientjes -1 siblings, 2 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Stephan von Krawczynski @ 2009-07-27 11:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, David Rientjes, Justin Piszcz On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:45:33 +0200 (CEST) "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13648 > Subject : nfsd: page allocation failure > Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com> > Date : 2009-06-22 12:08 (35 days old) > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/22/309 > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124748600712853&w=4 > This is no regression between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. In fact we could reproduce the problem with kernel versions: 2.6.27.26 < X <= 2.6.30.3 (Meaning 2.6.27.26 is the last one _not_ showing the problem). -- Regards, Stephan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13648] nfsd: page allocation failure @ 2009-07-27 22:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephan von Krawczynski Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, David Rientjes, Justin Piszcz On Monday 27 July 2009, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:45:33 +0200 (CEST) > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13648 > > Subject : nfsd: page allocation failure > > Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com> > > Date : 2009-06-22 12:08 (35 days old) > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/22/309 > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124748600712853&w=4 > > > > This is no regression between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > In fact we could reproduce the problem with kernel versions: > > 2.6.27.26 < X <= 2.6.30.3 > > (Meaning 2.6.27.26 is the last one _not_ showing the problem). Thanks, moved to the list of regressions from 2.6.27. Best, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13648] nfsd: page allocation failure @ 2009-07-27 22:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephan von Krawczynski Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, David Rientjes, Justin Piszcz On Monday 27 July 2009, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:45:33 +0200 (CEST) > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13648 > > Subject : nfsd: page allocation failure > > Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz-BP4nVm5VUdNhbmWW9KSYcQ@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2009-06-22 12:08 (35 days old) > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/22/309 > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124748600712853&w=4 > > > > This is no regression between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > In fact we could reproduce the problem with kernel versions: > > 2.6.27.26 < X <= 2.6.30.3 > > (Meaning 2.6.27.26 is the last one _not_ showing the problem). Thanks, moved to the list of regressions from 2.6.27. Best, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13648] nfsd: page allocation failure 2009-07-27 11:04 ` Stephan von Krawczynski 2009-07-27 22:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-30 21:30 ` David Rientjes 2009-07-31 11:48 ` Stephan von Krawczynski 1 sibling, 1 reply; 336+ messages in thread From: David Rientjes @ 2009-07-30 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephan von Krawczynski Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Justin Piszcz, Jeff Kirsher, Jesse Brandeburg, David S. Miller On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > This is no regression between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > In fact we could reproduce the problem with kernel versions: > > 2.6.27.26 < X <= 2.6.30.3 > > (Meaning 2.6.27.26 is the last one _not_ showing the problem). > And 2.6.28.10 is showing the exact same problem as initially reported, right? I noticed your /var/log/messages is showing you're using slub as opposed to slab (which Justin was using, and causing order-0 allocations errors). SLUB uses order-1 allocations for this cache growth and it's failing because of memory fragmentation, not because you're truly oom. The only thing that is immediately apparent that changed in this path over these kernel versions (there were significant changes to e1000e) is the CRC stripping. If it's loaded as a module, perhaps you could try modprobe e1000e CrcStripping=0,0 (assuming you have two adapters). I've cc'd some relevant e1000e driver people in the hopes they'll be able to diagnose this problem. Memory fragmentation as the result of page group changes wouldn't affect order-0 allocations such as this on slab, so it's doubtful the VM regressed if you can reproduce the problem with CONFIG_SLAB. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13648] nfsd: page allocation failure @ 2009-07-31 11:48 ` Stephan von Krawczynski 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Stephan von Krawczynski @ 2009-07-31 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Rientjes Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Justin Piszcz, Jeff Kirsher, Jesse Brandeburg, David S. Miller On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:30:42 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > > This is no regression between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > In fact we could reproduce the problem with kernel versions: > > > > 2.6.27.26 < X <= 2.6.30.3 > > > > (Meaning 2.6.27.26 is the last one _not_ showing the problem). > > > > And 2.6.28.10 is showing the exact same problem as initially reported, > right? Yes, that is correct. > I noticed your /var/log/messages is showing you're using slub as opposed > to slab (which Justin was using, and causing order-0 allocations errors). > SLUB uses order-1 allocations for this cache growth and it's failing > because of memory fragmentation, not because you're truly oom. Originally I used slab, and as someone wanted me to test slub I tried. The results looked pretty much the same to me. > The only thing that is immediately apparent that changed in this path over > these kernel versions (there were significant changes to e1000e) is the > CRC stripping. If it's loaded as a module, perhaps you could try > > modprobe e1000e CrcStripping=0,0 > > (assuming you have two adapters). I will try that. > I've cc'd some relevant e1000e driver people in the hopes they'll be able > to diagnose this problem. Memory fragmentation as the result of page > group changes wouldn't affect order-0 allocations such as this on slab, so > it's doubtful the VM regressed if you can reproduce the problem with > CONFIG_SLAB. I can, as said before, the problem first showed up with slab. -- Regards, Stephan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13648] nfsd: page allocation failure @ 2009-07-31 11:48 ` Stephan von Krawczynski 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Stephan von Krawczynski @ 2009-07-31 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Rientjes Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Justin Piszcz, Jeff Kirsher, Jesse Brandeburg, David S. Miller On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:30:42 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes <rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > > This is no regression between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > In fact we could reproduce the problem with kernel versions: > > > > 2.6.27.26 < X <= 2.6.30.3 > > > > (Meaning 2.6.27.26 is the last one _not_ showing the problem). > > > > And 2.6.28.10 is showing the exact same problem as initially reported, > right? Yes, that is correct. > I noticed your /var/log/messages is showing you're using slub as opposed > to slab (which Justin was using, and causing order-0 allocations errors). > SLUB uses order-1 allocations for this cache growth and it's failing > because of memory fragmentation, not because you're truly oom. Originally I used slab, and as someone wanted me to test slub I tried. The results looked pretty much the same to me. > The only thing that is immediately apparent that changed in this path over > these kernel versions (there were significant changes to e1000e) is the > CRC stripping. If it's loaded as a module, perhaps you could try > > modprobe e1000e CrcStripping=0,0 > > (assuming you have two adapters). I will try that. > I've cc'd some relevant e1000e driver people in the hopes they'll be able > to diagnose this problem. Memory fragmentation as the result of page > group changes wouldn't affect order-0 allocations such as this on slab, so > it's doubtful the VM regressed if you can reproduce the problem with > CONFIG_SLAB. I can, as said before, the problem first showed up with slab. -- Regards, Stephan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13644] hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Johannes Stezenbach, Rafael J. Wysocki This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13644 Subject : hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net> Date : 2009-06-16 01:27 (41 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/15/630 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/504 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13644] hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Johannes Stezenbach, Rafael J. Wysocki This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13644 Subject : hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js-FF7aIK3TAVNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-16 01:27 (41 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/15/630 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/504 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13649] Bad page state in process with various applications 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maxim Levitsky, Mel Gorman This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13649 Subject : Bad page state in process with various applications Submitter : Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-20 15:27 (37 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=124551168828090&w=4 Handled-By : Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/33130/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13649] Bad page state in process with various applications @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maxim Levitsky, Mel Gorman This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13649 Subject : Bad page state in process with various applications Submitter : Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-20 15:27 (37 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=124551168828090&w=4 Handled-By : Mel Gorman <mel-wPRd99KPJ+uzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/33130/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13649] Bad page state in process with various applications 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 9:05 ` Johannes Weiner -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Johannes Weiner @ 2009-07-27 9:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maxim Levitsky, Mel Gorman On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 10:45:33PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13649 > Subject : Bad page state in process with various applications > Submitter : Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com> > Date : 2009-06-20 15:27 (37 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=124551168828090&w=4 > Handled-By : Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/33130/ Fixed in mainline: c277331d5fbaae5772ed19862feefa91f4e477d3 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13649] Bad page state in process with various applications @ 2009-07-27 9:05 ` Johannes Weiner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Johannes Weiner @ 2009-07-27 9:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maxim Levitsky, Mel Gorman On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 10:45:33PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13649 > Subject : Bad page state in process with various applications > Submitter : Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2009-06-20 15:27 (37 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=124551168828090&w=4 > Handled-By : Mel Gorman <mel-wPRd99KPJ+uzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org> > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/33130/ Fixed in mainline: c277331d5fbaae5772ed19862feefa91f4e477d3 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13649] Bad page state in process with various applications @ 2009-07-27 22:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Johannes Weiner Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maxim Levitsky, Mel Gorman On Monday 27 July 2009, Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 10:45:33PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13649 > > Subject : Bad page state in process with various applications > > Submitter : Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com> > > Date : 2009-06-20 15:27 (37 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=124551168828090&w=4 > > Handled-By : Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> > > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/33130/ > > Fixed in mainline: c277331d5fbaae5772ed19862feefa91f4e477d3 Thanks, closed. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13649] Bad page state in process with various applications @ 2009-07-27 22:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Johannes Weiner Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maxim Levitsky, Mel Gorman On Monday 27 July 2009, Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 10:45:33PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13649 > > Subject : Bad page state in process with various applications > > Submitter : Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2009-06-20 15:27 (37 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=124551168828090&w=4 > > Handled-By : Mel Gorman <mel-wPRd99KPJ+uzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org> > > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/33130/ > > Fixed in mainline: c277331d5fbaae5772ed19862feefa91f4e477d3 Thanks, closed. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13669] Kernel bug with dock driver 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (39 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, Joerg Platte This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13669 Subject : Kernel bug with dock driver Submitter : Joerg Platte <jplatte@naasa.net> Date : 2009-06-14 21:00 (43 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/14/216 Handled-By : Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13694] i915 phantom TV 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciek Józiewicz This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13694 Subject : i915 phantom TV Submitter : Maciek Józiewicz <mjoziew@gmail.com> Date : 2009-07-02 12:26 (25 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13694] i915 phantom TV @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciek Józiewicz This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13694 Subject : i915 phantom TV Submitter : Maciek Józiewicz <mjoziew@gmail.com> Date : 2009-07-02 12:26 (25 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13681] A number of usb Devices causes Oops messages and kernel panics. 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexander Kaltsas, Andrew Morton, Hugh Dickins, Linus Torvalds, Mel Gorman This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13681 Subject : A number of usb Devices causes Oops messages and kernel panics. Submitter : Alexander Kaltsas <alexkaltsas@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-30 13:06 (27 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13681] A number of usb Devices causes Oops messages and kernel panics. @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexander Kaltsas, Andrew Morton, Hugh Dickins, Linus Torvalds, Mel Gorman This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13681 Subject : A number of usb Devices causes Oops messages and kernel panics. Submitter : Alexander Kaltsas <alexkaltsas-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-30 13:06 (27 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13681] A number of usb Devices causes Oops messages and kernel panics. 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-29 13:29 ` Greg KH -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2009-07-29 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alexander Kaltsas, Andrew Morton, Hugh Dickins, Linus Torvalds, Mel Gorman On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 10:45:34PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13681 > Subject : A number of usb Devices causes Oops messages and kernel panics. > Submitter : Alexander Kaltsas <alexkaltsas@gmail.com> > Date : 2009-06-30 13:06 (27 days old) This can no longer be reproduced by the original reporter, so it should be closed. thanks, greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13681] A number of usb Devices causes Oops messages and kernel panics. @ 2009-07-29 13:29 ` Greg KH 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2009-07-29 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alexander Kaltsas, Andrew Morton, Hugh Dickins, Linus Torvalds, Mel Gorman On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 10:45:34PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13681 > Subject : A number of usb Devices causes Oops messages and kernel panics. > Submitter : Alexander Kaltsas <alexkaltsas-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2009-06-30 13:06 (27 days old) This can no longer be reproduced by the original reporter, so it should be closed. thanks, greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13681] A number of usb Devices causes Oops messages and kernel panics. @ 2009-07-29 21:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-29 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg KH Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alexander Kaltsas, Andrew Morton, Hugh Dickins, Linus Torvalds, Mel Gorman On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 10:45:34PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13681 > > Subject : A number of usb Devices causes Oops messages and kernel panics. > > Submitter : Alexander Kaltsas <alexkaltsas@gmail.com> > > Date : 2009-06-30 13:06 (27 days old) > > This can no longer be reproduced by the original reporter, so it should > be closed. Done. Best, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13681] A number of usb Devices causes Oops messages and kernel panics. @ 2009-07-29 21:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-29 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg KH Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alexander Kaltsas, Andrew Morton, Hugh Dickins, Linus Torvalds, Mel Gorman On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 10:45:34PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13681 > > Subject : A number of usb Devices causes Oops messages and kernel panics. > > Submitter : Alexander Kaltsas <alexkaltsas-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2009-06-30 13:06 (27 days old) > > This can no longer be reproduced by the original reporter, so it should > be closed. Done. Best, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13682] The webcam stopped working when upgrading from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (42 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Nathanael Schaeffer This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13682 Subject : The webcam stopped working when upgrading from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30 Submitter : Nathanael Schaeffer <nathanael.schaeffer@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-30 13:34 (27 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13795] abnormal boot and no suspend due to 'async' (fastboot) 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (43 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Arjan van de Ven, Rafal Kaczynski This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13795 Subject : abnormal boot and no suspend due to 'async' (fastboot) Submitter : Rafal Kaczynski <fscnoboot@wp.pl> Date : 2009-07-18 17:19 (9 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13780] NULL pointer dereference loading powernowk8 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (44 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-07-30 22:16 ` David Rientjes -1 siblings, 1 reply; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Kurt Roeckx This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13780 Subject : NULL pointer dereference loading powernowk8 Submitter : Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> Date : 2009-07-15 18:00 (12 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13780] NULL pointer dereference loading powernowk8 2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13780] NULL pointer dereference loading powernowk8 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-30 22:16 ` David Rientjes 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: David Rientjes @ 2009-07-30 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Kurt Roeckx, Rusty Russell On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13780 > Subject : NULL pointer dereference loading powernowk8 > Submitter : Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> > Date : 2009-07-15 18:00 (12 days old) > powernowk8_cpu_init() has since been largely modified for cpumask changes commit 1ff6e97f1d993dff2f9b6f4a9173687370660232. Kurt, could you try 2.6.31-rc4? If it still hits a bug, please post the dmesg and your .config. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13780] NULL pointer dereference loading powernowk8 @ 2009-07-30 22:16 ` David Rientjes 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: David Rientjes @ 2009-07-30 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Kurt Roeckx, Rusty Russell On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13780 > Subject : NULL pointer dereference loading powernowk8 > Submitter : Kurt Roeckx <kurt-burXGKnpAKGzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2009-07-15 18:00 (12 days old) > powernowk8_cpu_init() has since been largely modified for cpumask changes commit 1ff6e97f1d993dff2f9b6f4a9173687370660232. Kurt, could you try 2.6.31-rc4? If it still hits a bug, please post the dmesg and your .config. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13739] 2.6.30 leaking keys on console switch 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (45 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andi Kleen, Jiri Kosina This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13739 Subject : 2.6.30 leaking keys on console switch Submitter : Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Date : 2009-07-07 8:44 (20 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124695628924382&w=4 Handled-By : Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13751] oops on HP/Compaq 6910p lid closure 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bjorn Helgaas, Matthew Garrett This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13751 Subject : oops on HP/Compaq 6910p lid closure Submitter : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Date : 2009-07-09 15:17 (18 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13751] oops on HP/Compaq 6910p lid closure @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bjorn Helgaas, Matthew Garrett This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13751 Subject : oops on HP/Compaq 6910p lid closure Submitter : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-07-09 15:17 (18 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13797] iBook G4 doesn't suspend since 2ed8d2b3a8 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jörg Sommer, Rafael J. Wysocki This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13797 Subject : iBook G4 doesn't suspend since 2ed8d2b3a8 Submitter : Jörg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de> Date : 2009-07-18 20:18 (9 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13797] iBook G4 doesn't suspend since 2ed8d2b3a8 @ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jörg Sommer, Rafael J. Wysocki This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13797 Subject : iBook G4 doesn't suspend since 2ed8d2b3a8 Submitter : Jörg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de> Date : 2009-07-18 20:18 (9 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13797] iBook G4 doesn't suspend since 2ed8d2b3a8 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-27 22:23 ` Jörg Sommer -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Jörg Sommer @ 2009-07-27 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 706 bytes --] Hi Rafael, Rafael J. Wysocki hat am Sun 26. Jul, 22:45 (+0200) geschrieben: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). Yes, the bug still exists. I can't put my iBook asleep using 2.6.30-rc4. Regards, Jörg. -- Da würde ich auch lieber den Panzerführerschein machen als den MCSE. Bringt mehr, dürfte das gleiche kosten und macht sicher mehr Spaß. Jens Dittmar in de.comp.security [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13797] iBook G4 doesn't suspend since 2ed8d2b3a8 @ 2009-07-27 22:23 ` Jörg Sommer 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Jörg Sommer @ 2009-07-27 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 706 bytes --] Hi Rafael, Rafael J. Wysocki hat am Sun 26. Jul, 22:45 (+0200) geschrieben: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). Yes, the bug still exists. I can't put my iBook asleep using 2.6.30-rc4. Regards, Jörg. -- Da würde ich auch lieber den Panzerführerschein machen als den MCSE. Bringt mehr, dürfte das gleiche kosten und macht sicher mehr Spaß. Jens Dittmar in de.comp.security [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules 2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (48 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2009-07-28 14:40 ` Jan Scholz 2009-07-28 15:26 ` Johannes Berg -1 siblings, 1 reply; 336+ messages in thread From: Jan Scholz @ 2009-07-28 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Johannes Berg Cc: Jan Scholz, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Tomas Janousek, John W. Linville Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> writes: > On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 19:20 +0200, Jan Scholz wrote: >> Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> writes: >> >> > On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 16:07 +0200, Jan Scholz wrote: >> > >> >> > Jan, can you run with console_suspend=0 (or whatever it is now, Rafael >> >> > will correct me if I'm wrong) that should work on your platform, and put >> >> > a bunch of printk calls into __ieee80211_suspend in net/mac80211/pm.c to >> >> > see where in there it's hanging? >> >> >> >> Did that, seems like it hangs in >> >> drv_remove_interface(local, &conf); >> > >> > Ok, thanks! I was going to suggest doing the same in >> > b43_op_remove_interface in drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c, but I think >> > the problem is just that we have an ordering problem and call drv_stop >> > before drv_remove_interface. I'll try to come up with a fix soon -- >> > might not be able to today though, in the meantime I guess you can just >> > move the drv_stop call to the end of the function and tell me if that >> > works -- that would be racy but should be ok most of the time. >> >> I moved drv_stop to the end of the function (see patch below) and now >> suspend works fine. > > Thanks, that's what I suspected -- I'll take a closer look into what is > required to make it race-free against RX. > Hi, The bug is still present in v2.6.31-rc4, it's still fixed by the patch (see below) suggested as a test by Johannes. Regards, Jan >> diff --git a/net/mac80211/pm.c b/net/mac80211/pm.c >> index 7a549f9..0ac15fb 100644 >> --- a/net/mac80211/pm.c >> +++ b/net/mac80211/pm.c >> @@ -58,12 +58,6 @@ int __ieee80211_suspend(struct ieee80211_hw *hw) >> /* flush again, in case driver queued work */ >> flush_workqueue(local->hw.workqueue); >> >> - /* stop hardware - this must stop RX */ >> - if (local->open_count) { >> - ieee80211_led_radio(local, false); >> - drv_stop(local); >> - } >> - >> /* remove STAs */ >> spin_lock_irqsave(&local->sta_lock, flags); >> list_for_each_entry(sta, &local->sta_list, list) { >> @@ -111,6 +105,12 @@ int __ieee80211_suspend(struct ieee80211_hw *hw) >> drv_remove_interface(local, &conf); >> } >> >> + /* stop hardware - this must stop RX */ >> + if (local->open_count) { >> + ieee80211_led_radio(local, false); >> + drv_stop(local); >> + } >> + >> local->suspended = true; >> local->quiescing = false; >> -- Jan Scholz ____ ____ __ ___ ( ___)(_ _) /__\ / __) Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies )__) _)(_ /(__)\ \__ \ (__) (____)(__)(__)(___/ Goethe Universitaet Frankfurt Ruth-Moufang-Str. 1 Tel. 069-798-47534 60438 Frankfurt am Main ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules @ 2009-07-28 15:26 ` Johannes Berg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Johannes Berg @ 2009-07-28 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Scholz Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Tomas Janousek, John W. Linville [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 288 bytes --] On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 16:40 +0200, Jan Scholz wrote: > The bug is still present in v2.6.31-rc4, it's still fixed by the patch > (see below) suggested as a test by Johannes. Sorry, this completely dropped off my radar, I'll take a look today. Thanks for reminding me. johannes [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules @ 2009-07-28 15:26 ` Johannes Berg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Johannes Berg @ 2009-07-28 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Scholz Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Tomas Janousek, John W. Linville [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 288 bytes --] On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 16:40 +0200, Jan Scholz wrote: > The bug is still present in v2.6.31-rc4, it's still fixed by the patch > (see below) suggested as a test by Johannes. Sorry, this completely dropped off my radar, I'll take a look today. Thanks for reminding me. johannes [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules 2009-07-28 15:26 ` Johannes Berg (?) @ 2009-07-28 21:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-07-28 23:51 ` [PATCH 2.6.31] mac80211: fix suspend Jan Scholz -1 siblings, 1 reply; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-28 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Johannes Berg Cc: Jan Scholz, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Tomas Janousek, John W. Linville On Tuesday 28 July 2009, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 16:40 +0200, Jan Scholz wrote: > > > The bug is still present in v2.6.31-rc4, it's still fixed by the patch > > (see below) suggested as a test by Johannes. > > Sorry, this completely dropped off my radar, I'll take a look today. > Thanks for reminding me. Thanks for the patch Johannes! Best, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2.6.31] mac80211: fix suspend 2009-07-28 21:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-28 23:51 ` Jan Scholz 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Jan Scholz @ 2009-07-28 23:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Johannes Berg Cc: John Linville, Jan Scholz, linux-wireless, Bob Copeland, Rafael J. Wysocki, Tomas Janousek, linux-kernel I applied the patch to v2.6.31-rc4 and suspend works just fine. Thanks, Jan Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> writes: > Jan reported that his b43-based laptop hangs during suspend. > The problem turned out to be mac80211 asking the driver to > stop the hardware before removing interfaces, and interface > removal caused b43 to touch the hardware (while down, which > causes the hang). > > This patch fixes mac80211 to do reorder these operations to > have them in the correct order -- first remove interfaces > and then stop the hardware. Some more code is necessary to > be able to do so in a race-free manner, in particular it is > necessary to not process frames received during quiescing. > > Fixes http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13337. > > Reported-by: Jan Scholz <scholz@fias.uni-frankfurt.de> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> > --- > net/mac80211/pm.c | 24 +++++++++++++++--------- > net/mac80211/rx.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > --- wireless-testing.orig/net/mac80211/pm.c 2009-07-28 17:58:11.000000000 +0200 > +++ wireless-testing/net/mac80211/pm.c 2009-07-28 18:06:25.000000000 +0200 > @@ -54,15 +54,6 @@ int __ieee80211_suspend(struct ieee80211 > > rcu_read_unlock(); > > - /* flush again, in case driver queued work */ > - flush_workqueue(local->hw.workqueue); > - > - /* stop hardware - this must stop RX */ > - if (local->open_count) { > - ieee80211_led_radio(local, false); > - drv_stop(local); > - } > - > /* remove STAs */ > spin_lock_bh(&local->sta_lock); > list_for_each_entry(sta, &local->sta_list, list) { > @@ -110,7 +101,22 @@ int __ieee80211_suspend(struct ieee80211 > drv_remove_interface(local, &conf); > } > > + /* stop hardware - this must stop RX */ > + if (local->open_count) { > + ieee80211_led_radio(local, false); > + drv_stop(local); > + } > + > + /* > + * flush again, in case driver queued work -- it > + * shouldn't be doing (or cancel everything in the > + * stop callback) that but better safe than sorry. > + */ > + flush_workqueue(local->hw.workqueue); > + > local->suspended = true; > + /* need suspended to be visible before quiescing is false */ > + barrier(); > local->quiescing = false; > > return 0; > --- wireless-testing.orig/net/mac80211/rx.c 2009-07-28 17:58:52.000000000 +0200 > +++ wireless-testing/net/mac80211/rx.c 2009-07-28 18:04:24.000000000 +0200 > @@ -2441,6 +2441,18 @@ void __ieee80211_rx(struct ieee80211_hw > return; > } > > + /* > + * If we're suspending, it is possible although not too likely > + * that we'd be receiving frames after having already partially > + * quiesced the stack. We can't process such frames then since > + * that might, for example, cause stations to be added or other > + * driver callbacks be invoked. > + */ > + if (unlikely(local->quiescing || local->suspended)) { > + kfree_skb(skb); > + return; > + } > + > if (status->flag & RX_FLAG_HT) { > /* rate_idx is MCS index */ > if (WARN_ON(status->rate_idx < 0 || > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13341] Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, patrick, Rusty Russell This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13341 Subject : Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules Submitter : <patrick@ostenberg.de> Date : 2009-05-19 09:08 (49 days old) Handled-By : Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13341] Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, patrick-nxAOmsU53hB6lmGzAMPh1A, Rusty Russell This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13341 Subject : Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules Submitter : <patrick-nxAOmsU53hB6lmGzAMPh1A@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-05-19 09:08 (49 days old) Handled-By : Rusty Russell <rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13351] 2.6.30 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar, unggnu, Yinghai Lu This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13351 Subject : 2.6.30 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk Submitter : <unggnu@googlemail.com> Date : 2009-05-20 14:09 (48 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=78a8b35bc7abf8b8333d6f625e08c0f7cc1c3742 Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13351] 2.6.30 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar, unggnu-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg, Yinghai Lu This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13351 Subject : 2.6.30 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk Submitter : <unggnu-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-05-20 14:09 (48 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=78a8b35bc7abf8b8333d6f625e08c0f7cc1c3742 Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alejandro Riveira, Chris Wright, Johannes Berg, John W. Linville This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362 Subject : rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap Submitter : Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com> Date : 2009-05-22 13:32 (46 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alejandro Riveira, Chris Wright, Johannes Berg, John W. Linville This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362 Subject : rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap Submitter : Alejandro Riveira <ariveira-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-05-22 13:32 (46 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 10:06 ` Alejandro Riveira Fernández -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Alejandro Riveira Fernández @ 2009-07-07 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Chris Wright, Johannes Berg, John W. Linville El Tue, 7 Jul 2009 02:00:38 +0200 (CEST) "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> escribió: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > It should be still listed 2.6.30.1 does not fix it. still not tried 2.6.31-rc* though. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362 > Subject : rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap > Submitter : Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com> > Date : 2009-05-22 13:32 (46 days old) > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap @ 2009-07-07 10:06 ` Alejandro Riveira Fernández 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Alejandro Riveira Fernández @ 2009-07-07 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Chris Wright, Johannes Berg, John W. Linville El Tue, 7 Jul 2009 02:00:38 +0200 (CEST) "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> escribió: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > It should be still listed 2.6.30.1 does not fix it. still not tried 2.6.31-rc* though. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362 > Subject : rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap > Submitter : Alejandro Riveira <ariveira-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2009-05-22 13:32 (46 days old) > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap 2009-07-07 10:06 ` Alejandro Riveira Fernández @ 2009-07-07 11:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 11:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alejandro Riveira Fernández Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Chris Wright, Johannes Berg, John W. Linville On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote: > El Tue, 7 Jul 2009 02:00:38 +0200 (CEST) > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> escribió: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > It should be still listed 2.6.30.1 does not fix it. still not tried > 2.6.31-rc* though. Thanks for the update. Best, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap @ 2009-07-07 11:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 11:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alejandro Riveira Fernández Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Chris Wright, Johannes Berg, John W. Linville On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote: > El Tue, 7 Jul 2009 02:00:38 +0200 (CEST) > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> escribió: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > It should be still listed 2.6.30.1 does not fix it. still not tried > 2.6.31-rc* though. Thanks for the update. Best, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13374] reiserfs blocked for more than 120secs 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Harald Dunkel This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13374 Subject : reiserfs blocked for more than 120secs Submitter : Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@t-online.de> Date : 2009-05-23 8:52 (45 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124306880410811&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/29/389 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13374] reiserfs blocked for more than 120secs @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Harald Dunkel This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13374 Subject : reiserfs blocked for more than 120secs Submitter : Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel-zqRNUXuvxA0b1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-05-23 8:52 (45 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124306880410811&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/29/389 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13373] fbcon, intelfb, i915: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Miles Lane This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13373 Subject : fbcon, intelfb, i915: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> Date : 2009-05-23 5:08 (45 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124305538130702&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13373] fbcon, intelfb, i915: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Miles Lane This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13373 Subject : fbcon, intelfb, i915: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-05-23 5:08 (45 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124305538130702&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13389] Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Frans Pop This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389 Subject : Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2009-05-26 15:24 (42 days old) Handled-By : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13389] Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Frans Pop This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389 Subject : Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-05-26 15:24 (42 days old) Handled-By : Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13389] Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 19:19 ` Frans Pop -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Frans Pop @ 2009-07-07 19:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Len Brown, rui.zhang On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389 > Subject : Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when > it should not be > Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> > Date : 2009-05-26 15:24 (42 days old) > Handled-By : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> > Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671 > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672 I still have not received any reaction from the ACPI maintainers to the bug or the proposed patches. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13389] Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be @ 2009-07-07 19:19 ` Frans Pop 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Frans Pop @ 2009-07-07 19:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Len Brown, rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389 > Subject : Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when > it should not be > Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2009-05-26 15:24 (42 days old) > Handled-By : Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> > Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671 > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672 I still have not received any reaction from the ACPI maintainers to the bug or the proposed patches. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13389] Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be @ 2009-07-07 20:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Frans Pop, Len Brown Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, rui.zhang On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Frans Pop wrote: > On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389 > > Subject : Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when > > it should not be > > Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> > > Date : 2009-05-26 15:24 (42 days old) > > Handled-By : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> > > Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671 > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672 > > I still have not received any reaction from the ACPI maintainers to the > bug or the proposed patches. Sorry for that. Len, what do you think of the patches listed above? Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13389] Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be @ 2009-07-07 20:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Frans Pop, Len Brown Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Frans Pop wrote: > On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389 > > Subject : Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when > > it should not be > > Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2009-05-26 15:24 (42 days old) > > Handled-By : Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> > > Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671 > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672 > > I still have not received any reaction from the ACPI maintainers to the > bug or the proposed patches. Sorry for that. Len, what do you think of the patches listed above? Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13389] Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be @ 2009-07-08 0:56 ` Zhang Rui 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Zhang Rui @ 2009-07-08 0:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Frans Pop, Len Brown, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 04:11 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Frans Pop wrote: > > On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389 > > > Subject : Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when > > > it should not be > > > Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> > > > Date : 2009-05-26 15:24 (42 days old) > > > Handled-By : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> > > > Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671 > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672 > > both Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> thanks, rui > > I still have not received any reaction from the ACPI maintainers to the > > bug or the proposed patches. > > Sorry for that. > > Len, what do you think of the patches listed above? > > Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13389] Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be @ 2009-07-08 0:56 ` Zhang Rui 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Zhang Rui @ 2009-07-08 0:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Frans Pop, Len Brown, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 04:11 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Frans Pop wrote: > > On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389 > > > Subject : Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when > > > it should not be > > > Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> > > > Date : 2009-05-26 15:24 (42 days old) > > > Handled-By : Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> > > > Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671 > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672 > > both Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> thanks, rui > > I still have not received any reaction from the ACPI maintainers to the > > bug or the proposed patches. > > Sorry for that. > > Len, what do you think of the patches listed above? > > Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13401] pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected) 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jens Axboe, Laurent Riffard This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13401 Subject : pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected) Submitter : Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@free.fr> Date : 2009-05-28 18:43 (40 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13401] pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected) @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jens Axboe, Laurent Riffard This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13401 Subject : pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected) Submitter : Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-05-28 18:43 (40 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13407] adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Jan Scholz, Rafael J. Wysocki This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13407 Subject : adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram Submitter : Jan Scholz <scholz@fias.uni-frankfurt.de> Date : 2009-05-28 7:59 (40 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ed8d2b3a81bdbb0418301628ccdb008ac9f40b7 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124349762314976&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13407] adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Jan Scholz, Rafael J. Wysocki This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13407 Subject : adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram Submitter : Jan Scholz <scholz-wOpdxP1gw6Cc+IqHO83+wjjhTm2NLCe8@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-05-28 7:59 (40 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ed8d2b3a81bdbb0418301628ccdb008ac9f40b7 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124349762314976&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13424] possible deadlock when doing governor switching 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Mathieu Desnoyers, Shaohua Li This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13424 Subject : possible deadlock when doing governor switching Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Date : 2009-05-31 16:36 (37 days old) References : http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg00711.html http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/28/405 Handled-By : Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13424] possible deadlock when doing governor switching @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Mathieu Desnoyers, Shaohua Li This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13424 Subject : possible deadlock when doing governor switching Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-05-31 16:36 (37 days old) References : http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg00711.html http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/28/405 Handled-By : Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers-scC8bbJcJLCw5LPnMra/2Q@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13408] Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton, Diego Calleja This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13408 Subject : Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7 Submitter : Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com> Date : 2009-05-30 18:51 (38 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/30/146 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13408] Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7 @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton, Diego Calleja This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13408 Subject : Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7 Submitter : Diego Calleja <diegocg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-05-30 18:51 (38 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/30/146 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13471] Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, ACPI Devel Maling List, Ozan Çağlayan This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13471 Subject : Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled Submitter : Ozan Çağlayan <ozan@pardus.org.tr> Date : 2009-06-04 9:12 (33 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124410667532558&w=4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13471] Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, ACPI Devel Maling List, Ozan Çağlayan This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13471 Subject : Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled Submitter : Ozan Çağlayan <ozan@pardus.org.tr> Date : 2009-06-04 9:12 (33 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124410667532558&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13475] suspend/hibernate lockdep warning 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Young, Mathieu Desnoyers This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13475 Subject : suspend/hibernate lockdep warning Submitter : Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-02 10:00 (35 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124393723321241&w=4 Handled-By : Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/28660/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13475] suspend/hibernate lockdep warning @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Young, Mathieu Desnoyers This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13475 Subject : suspend/hibernate lockdep warning Submitter : Dave Young <hidave.darkstar-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-02 10:00 (35 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124393723321241&w=4 Handled-By : Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers-scC8bbJcJLCw5LPnMra/2Q@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/28660/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13502] GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, sveina This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13502 Subject : GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1 Submitter : <sveina@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-10 20:04 (27 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13502] GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1 @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, sveina-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13502 Subject : GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1 Submitter : <sveina-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-10 20:04 (27 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13472] Oops with minicom and USB serial 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern, Peter Chubb This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13472 Subject : Oops with minicom and USB serial Submitter : Peter Chubb <peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au> Date : 2009-06-05 1:37 (32 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124416901026700&w=4 Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13472] Oops with minicom and USB serial @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern, Peter Chubb This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13472 Subject : Oops with minicom and USB serial Submitter : Peter Chubb <peterc-M3ycANVxPotyL3EAZA59ERCuuivNXqWP@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-05 1:37 (32 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124416901026700&w=4 Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13512] D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Daniel Smolik, Rafael J. Wysocki This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13512 Subject : D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore Submitter : Daniel Smolik <marvin@mydatex.cz> Date : 2009-06-11 20:12 (26 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13512] D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Daniel Smolik, Rafael J. Wysocki This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13512 Subject : D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore Submitter : Daniel Smolik <marvin-0pWKB23IDFjrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-11 20:12 (26 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13518] slab grows with NFS write activity. 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrew Randrianasulu, Linus Torvalds This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13518 Subject : slab grows with NFS write activity. Submitter : Andrew Randrianasulu <randrik@mail.ru> Date : 2009-06-12 09:51 (25 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13518] slab grows with NFS write activity. @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrew Randrianasulu, Linus Torvalds This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13518 Subject : slab grows with NFS write activity. Submitter : Andrew Randrianasulu <randrik-JGs/UdohzUI@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-12 09:51 (25 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13514] acer_wmi causes stack corruption 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Rus This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13514 Subject : acer_wmi causes stack corruption Submitter : Rus <harbour@sfinx.od.ua> Date : 2009-06-12 08:13 (25 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13514] acer_wmi causes stack corruption @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Rus This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13514 Subject : acer_wmi causes stack corruption Submitter : Rus <harbour-K87ZgELTUEPsG83rWm+8vg@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-12 08:13 (25 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13554] linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jos van Wolput This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13554 Subject : linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window Submitter : Jos van Wolput <wolput@onsneteindhoven.nl> Date : 2009-06-17 06:28 (20 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13554] linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jos van Wolput This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13554 Subject : linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window Submitter : Jos van Wolput <wolput-kN7GrHn7egj0B9fh5IxImPP6llvjuJOh@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-17 06:28 (20 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13554] linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-20 21:35 ` Andrew Morton -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2009-07-20 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: linux-kernel, kernel-testers, wolput, Nico Schottelius, Jesse Barnes, dri-devel On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 02:00:46 +0200 (CEST) "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13554 > Subject : linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window > Submitter : Jos van Wolput <wolput@onsneteindhoven.nl> > Date : 2009-06-17 06:28 (20 days old) Nico reported a black-screen regression too. Subject: 2.6.31-r2: Xorg: Black screen Compared to the other normal brightness problems, with 2.6.31-r2 xorg starts, but there is no image displayed (neither on internal nor external monitor). Switching back to console does not change the status, though hitting ctrlaltdel reboots the system (i.e. still up and running fine). It works with 2.6.30-rc7 (besides sometimes the brightness is broken there). This looks like it might be a post-2.6.30 regression, in which case it might have a separate cause. We're having a lot of problems in this area. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13554] linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window @ 2009-07-20 21:35 ` Andrew Morton 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2009-07-20 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, wolput-kN7GrHn7egj0B9fh5IxImPP6llvjuJOh, Nico Schottelius, Jesse Barnes, dri-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 02:00:46 +0200 (CEST) "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13554 > Subject : linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window > Submitter : Jos van Wolput <wolput-kN7GrHn7egj0B9fh5IxImPP6llvjuJOh@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2009-06-17 06:28 (20 days old) Nico reported a black-screen regression too. Subject: 2.6.31-r2: Xorg: Black screen Compared to the other normal brightness problems, with 2.6.31-r2 xorg starts, but there is no image displayed (neither on internal nor external monitor). Switching back to console does not change the status, though hitting ctrlaltdel reboots the system (i.e. still up and running fine). It works with 2.6.30-rc7 (besides sometimes the brightness is broken there). This looks like it might be a post-2.6.30 regression, in which case it might have a separate cause. We're having a lot of problems in this area. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13558] Tracelog during resume 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13558 Subject : Tracelog during resume Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz> Date : 2009-06-17 11:32 (20 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13558] Tracelog during resume @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13558 Subject : Tracelog during resume Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml-VIXq6x/3rUk@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-17 11:32 (20 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13620] acpi_enforce_resources broken - conflicting i2c module loaded on some EeePCs 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Jenkins, Bob Moore This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13620 Subject : acpi_enforce_resources broken - conflicting i2c module loaded on some EeePCs Submitter : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk> Date : 2009-06-25 08:31 (12 days old) References : <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-eeepc-devel/2009-June/002316.html> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13620] acpi_enforce_resources broken - conflicting i2c module loaded on some EeePCs @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Jenkins, Bob Moore This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13620 Subject : acpi_enforce_resources broken - conflicting i2c module loaded on some EeePCs Submitter : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins-cCz0Lq7MMjm9FHfhHBbuYA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-25 08:31 (12 days old) References : <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-eeepc-devel/2009-June/002316.html> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13564] random general protection fault at boot time caused by khubd. 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Pauli This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13564 Subject : random general protection fault at boot time caused by khubd. Submitter : Pauli <suokkos@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-18 12:44 (19 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13564] random general protection fault at boot time caused by khubd. @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Pauli This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13564 Subject : random general protection fault at boot time caused by khubd. Submitter : Pauli <suokkos-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-18 12:44 (19 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13581] ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Matteo This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13581 Subject : ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels Submitter : Matteo <rootkit85@yahoo.it> Date : 2009-06-19 12:04 (18 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13581] ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Matteo This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13581 Subject : ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels Submitter : Matteo <rootkit85-whZMOeQn8C0@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-19 12:04 (18 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13583] pdflush uses 5% CPU on otherwise idle system 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Paul Martin This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13583 Subject : pdflush uses 5% CPU on otherwise idle system Submitter : Paul Martin <pm@debian.org> Date : 2009-06-19 13:33 (18 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13583] pdflush uses 5% CPU on otherwise idle system @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Paul Martin This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13583 Subject : pdflush uses 5% CPU on otherwise idle system Submitter : Paul Martin <pm-8fiUuRrzOP0dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-19 13:33 (18 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13621] xfs hangs with assertion failed 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Johannes Engel This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13621 Subject : xfs hangs with assertion failed Submitter : Johannes Engel <jcnengel@googlemail.com> Date : 2009-06-25 10:07 (12 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13621] xfs hangs with assertion failed @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Johannes Engel This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13621 Subject : xfs hangs with assertion failed Submitter : Johannes Engel <jcnengel-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-25 10:07 (12 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13624] usb: wrong autosuspend initialization 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern, list This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13624 Subject : usb: wrong autosuspend initialization Submitter : <list@phuk.ath.cx> Date : 2009-06-25 18:18 (12 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13624] usb: wrong autosuspend initialization @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern, list-2tUql6aCh3Vfq8cQ1yknNg This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13624 Subject : usb: wrong autosuspend initialization Submitter : <list-2tUql6aCh3Vfq8cQ1yknNg@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-25 18:18 (12 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13624] usb: wrong autosuspend initialization 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (?) @ 2009-07-07 0:22 ` list -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: list @ 2009-07-07 0:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern I think this should be considered a regression, at least until laptop_mode has been fixed to deal with it. I've reported it to their mailing list, but it seems somebody has to come up with a patch (I won't be able to look into it before mid-August). Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13624 > Subject : usb: wrong autosuspend initialization > Submitter : <list@phuk.ath.cx> > Date : 2009-06-25 18:18 (12 days old) > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13634] [drm:drm_wait_vblank] *ERROR* failed to acquire vblank counter, -22 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13634 Subject : [drm:drm_wait_vblank] *ERROR* failed to acquire vblank counter, -22 Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz> Date : 2009-06-27 07:02 (10 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13634] [drm:drm_wait_vblank] *ERROR* failed to acquire vblank counter, -22 @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13634 Subject : [drm:drm_wait_vblank] *ERROR* failed to acquire vblank counter, -22 Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml-VIXq6x/3rUk@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-27 07:02 (10 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13638] rt2870 driver is broken for (some) cards 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, jakob gruber This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13638 Subject : rt2870 driver is broken for (some) cards Submitter : jakob gruber <jakob.gruber@kabelnet.at> Date : 2009-06-27 17:33 (10 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13638] rt2870 driver is broken for (some) cards @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, jakob gruber This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13638 Subject : rt2870 driver is broken for (some) cards Submitter : jakob gruber <jakob.gruber-1wqg/2C4znHk7+2FdBfRIA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-27 17:33 (10 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13644] hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Johannes Stezenbach, Rafael J. Wysocki This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13644 Subject : hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net> Date : 2009-06-16 01:27 (21 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/15/630 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/504 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13644] hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Johannes Stezenbach, Rafael J. Wysocki This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13644 Subject : hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js-FF7aIK3TAVNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-16 01:27 (21 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/15/630 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/504 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13646] warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Pavel Machek This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13646 Subject : warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2009-06-19 17:05 (18 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/19/187 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13646] warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Pavel Machek This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13646 Subject : warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-19 17:05 (18 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/19/187 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13647] fb/mmap lockdep report. 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrea Righi, Dave Jones, Jarek Poplawski This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13647 Subject : fb/mmap lockdep report. Submitter : Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Date : 2009-06-21 13:33 (16 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=513adb58685615b0b1d47a3f0d40f5352beff189 References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/90 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/122 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13647] fb/mmap lockdep report. @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrea Righi, Dave Jones, Jarek Poplawski This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13647 Subject : fb/mmap lockdep report. Submitter : Dave Jones <davej-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-21 13:33 (16 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=513adb58685615b0b1d47a3f0d40f5352beff189 References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/90 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/122 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13647] fb/mmap lockdep report. 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 5:57 ` Jarek Poplawski -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Jarek Poplawski @ 2009-07-07 5:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Andrea Righi, Dave Jones On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 02:00:51AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13647 > Subject : fb/mmap lockdep report. > Submitter : Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> > Date : 2009-06-21 13:33 (16 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=513adb58685615b0b1d47a3f0d40f5352beff189 > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/90 > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/122 This lockdep report isn't triggered by 2.6.31-rc2 anymore. Thanks, Jarek P. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13647] fb/mmap lockdep report. @ 2009-07-07 5:57 ` Jarek Poplawski 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Jarek Poplawski @ 2009-07-07 5:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Andrea Righi, Dave Jones On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 02:00:51AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13647 > Subject : fb/mmap lockdep report. > Submitter : Dave Jones <davej-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2009-06-21 13:33 (16 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=513adb58685615b0b1d47a3f0d40f5352beff189 > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/90 > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/122 This lockdep report isn't triggered by 2.6.31-rc2 anymore. Thanks, Jarek P. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13647] fb/mmap lockdep report. @ 2009-07-07 11:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 11:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jarek Poplawski Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Andrea Righi, Dave Jones On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 02:00:51AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13647 > > Subject : fb/mmap lockdep report. > > Submitter : Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> > > Date : 2009-06-21 13:33 (16 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=513adb58685615b0b1d47a3f0d40f5352beff189 > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/90 > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/122 > > This lockdep report isn't triggered by 2.6.31-rc2 anymore. Thanks, I've closed the bug. Best, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13647] fb/mmap lockdep report. @ 2009-07-07 11:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 11:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jarek Poplawski Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Andrea Righi, Dave Jones On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 02:00:51AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13647 > > Subject : fb/mmap lockdep report. > > Submitter : Dave Jones <davej-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2009-06-21 13:33 (16 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=513adb58685615b0b1d47a3f0d40f5352beff189 > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/90 > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/122 > > This lockdep report isn't triggered by 2.6.31-rc2 anymore. Thanks, I've closed the bug. Best, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13648] nfsd: page allocation failure 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Justin Piszcz This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13648 Subject : nfsd: page allocation failure Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com> Date : 2009-06-22 12:08 (15 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/22/309 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13648] nfsd: page allocation failure @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Justin Piszcz This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13648 Subject : nfsd: page allocation failure Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz-BP4nVm5VUdNhbmWW9KSYcQ@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-22 12:08 (15 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/22/309 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13648] nfsd: page allocation failure 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 3:55 ` David Rientjes -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: David Rientjes @ 2009-07-07 3:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Justin Piszcz Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Rafael J. Wysocki On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13648 > Subject : nfsd: page allocation failure > Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com> > Date : 2009-06-22 12:08 (15 days old) > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/22/309 > Here's the last page allocation failure in the bug report: [415964.311165] nfsd: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x20 [415964.311168] Pid: 2680, comm: nfsd Not tainted 2.6.30 #2 [415964.311170] Call Trace: [415964.311171] <IRQ> [<ffffffff802849ed>] ? __alloc_pages_internal+0x3dd/0x4e0 [415964.311179] [<ffffffff802a6c77>] ? cache_alloc_refill+0x2d7/0x570 [415964.311182] [<ffffffff802a707d>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x8d/0xa0 [415964.311185] [<ffffffff805a6109>] ? __alloc_skb+0x49/0x160 [415964.311188] [<ffffffff805ea846>] ? tcp_send_ack+0x26/0x120 [415964.311191] [<ffffffff805e867d>] ? tcp_rcv_established+0x7bd/0x940 [415964.311193] [<ffffffff805efb1d>] ? tcp_v4_do_rcv+0xdd/0x210 [415964.311195] [<ffffffff805f02d6>] ? tcp_v4_rcv+0x686/0x750 ... [415964.311319] Active_anon:154810 active_file:131162 inactive_anon:33447 [415964.311320] inactive_file:690987 unevictable:0 dirty:112116 writeback:0 unstable:0 [415964.311321] free:8662 slab:965366 mapped:9316 pagetables:4618 bounce:0 [415964.311325] DMA free:9692kB min:16kB low:20kB high:24kB active_anon:0kB inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB present:8668kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes [415964.311328] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 3246 7980 7980 [415964.311333] DMA32 free:21312kB min:6656kB low:8320kB high:9984kB active_anon:118464kB inactive_anon:23908kB active_file:174708kB inactive_file:1206812kB unevictable:0kB present:3324312kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no [415964.311336] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 4734 4734 [415964.311341] Normal free:3644kB min:9708kB low:12132kB high:14560kB active_anon:500776kB inactive_anon:109880kB active_file:349940kB inactive_file:1557136kB unevictable:0kB present:4848000kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no [415964.311344] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0 ... There's simply no memory available in ZONE_NORMAL to satisfy the atomic allocation; you've been able to allocate beyond the 9708K minimum watermark because it's GFP_ATOMIC (and then only to 3641K because of ALLOC_HIGH and ALLOC_HARDER). 112116 pages, or 438M of memory, is dirty. [415964.311369] 827035 total pagecache pages [415964.311371] 4728 pages in swap cache [415964.311373] Swap cache stats: add 12746, delete 8018, find 16878/17480 [415964.311374] Free swap = 16756356kB [415964.311375] Total swap = 16787768kB [415964.312141] 2277376 pages RAM [415964.312141] 252254 pages reserved [415964.312141] 546309 pages shared [415964.312141] 1520221 pages non-shared And since you have an 8G machine, that value is only about half of the default dirty_background_ratio setting of 10 to start pdflush from writing it out. What is suspect is almost half of your system's memory is consumed by slab. Have you been able to collect slabtop -o when these failures happen to determine whether this is a duplicate of http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13518 ? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13648] nfsd: page allocation failure @ 2009-07-07 3:55 ` David Rientjes 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: David Rientjes @ 2009-07-07 3:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Justin Piszcz Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Rafael J. Wysocki On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13648 > Subject : nfsd: page allocation failure > Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz-BP4nVm5VUdNhbmWW9KSYcQ@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2009-06-22 12:08 (15 days old) > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/22/309 > Here's the last page allocation failure in the bug report: [415964.311165] nfsd: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x20 [415964.311168] Pid: 2680, comm: nfsd Not tainted 2.6.30 #2 [415964.311170] Call Trace: [415964.311171] <IRQ> [<ffffffff802849ed>] ? __alloc_pages_internal+0x3dd/0x4e0 [415964.311179] [<ffffffff802a6c77>] ? cache_alloc_refill+0x2d7/0x570 [415964.311182] [<ffffffff802a707d>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x8d/0xa0 [415964.311185] [<ffffffff805a6109>] ? __alloc_skb+0x49/0x160 [415964.311188] [<ffffffff805ea846>] ? tcp_send_ack+0x26/0x120 [415964.311191] [<ffffffff805e867d>] ? tcp_rcv_established+0x7bd/0x940 [415964.311193] [<ffffffff805efb1d>] ? tcp_v4_do_rcv+0xdd/0x210 [415964.311195] [<ffffffff805f02d6>] ? tcp_v4_rcv+0x686/0x750 ... [415964.311319] Active_anon:154810 active_file:131162 inactive_anon:33447 [415964.311320] inactive_file:690987 unevictable:0 dirty:112116 writeback:0 unstable:0 [415964.311321] free:8662 slab:965366 mapped:9316 pagetables:4618 bounce:0 [415964.311325] DMA free:9692kB min:16kB low:20kB high:24kB active_anon:0kB inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB present:8668kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes [415964.311328] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 3246 7980 7980 [415964.311333] DMA32 free:21312kB min:6656kB low:8320kB high:9984kB active_anon:118464kB inactive_anon:23908kB active_file:174708kB inactive_file:1206812kB unevictable:0kB present:3324312kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no [415964.311336] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 4734 4734 [415964.311341] Normal free:3644kB min:9708kB low:12132kB high:14560kB active_anon:500776kB inactive_anon:109880kB active_file:349940kB inactive_file:1557136kB unevictable:0kB present:4848000kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no [415964.311344] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0 ... There's simply no memory available in ZONE_NORMAL to satisfy the atomic allocation; you've been able to allocate beyond the 9708K minimum watermark because it's GFP_ATOMIC (and then only to 3641K because of ALLOC_HIGH and ALLOC_HARDER). 112116 pages, or 438M of memory, is dirty. [415964.311369] 827035 total pagecache pages [415964.311371] 4728 pages in swap cache [415964.311373] Swap cache stats: add 12746, delete 8018, find 16878/17480 [415964.311374] Free swap = 16756356kB [415964.311375] Total swap = 16787768kB [415964.312141] 2277376 pages RAM [415964.312141] 252254 pages reserved [415964.312141] 546309 pages shared [415964.312141] 1520221 pages non-shared And since you have an 8G machine, that value is only about half of the default dirty_background_ratio setting of 10 to start pdflush from writing it out. What is suspect is almost half of your system's memory is consumed by slab. Have you been able to collect slabtop -o when these failures happen to determine whether this is a duplicate of http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13518 ? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13648] nfsd: page allocation failure 2009-07-07 3:55 ` David Rientjes (?) @ 2009-07-07 8:01 ` Justin Piszcz -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Justin Piszcz @ 2009-07-07 8:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Rientjes Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Rafael J. Wysocki On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, David Rientjes wrote: > On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report >> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. >> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should >> be listed and let me know (either way). >> >> >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13648 >> Subject : nfsd: page allocation failure >> Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com> >> Date : 2009-06-22 12:08 (15 days old) >> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/22/309 >> > > Here's the last page allocation failure in the bug report: > > [415964.311165] nfsd: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x20 > [415964.311168] Pid: 2680, comm: nfsd Not tainted 2.6.30 #2 > [415964.311170] Call Trace: > [415964.311171] <IRQ> [<ffffffff802849ed>] ? __alloc_pages_internal+0x3dd/0x4e0 > [415964.311179] [<ffffffff802a6c77>] ? cache_alloc_refill+0x2d7/0x570 > [415964.311182] [<ffffffff802a707d>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x8d/0xa0 > [415964.311185] [<ffffffff805a6109>] ? __alloc_skb+0x49/0x160 > [415964.311188] [<ffffffff805ea846>] ? tcp_send_ack+0x26/0x120 > [415964.311191] [<ffffffff805e867d>] ? tcp_rcv_established+0x7bd/0x940 > [415964.311193] [<ffffffff805efb1d>] ? tcp_v4_do_rcv+0xdd/0x210 > [415964.311195] [<ffffffff805f02d6>] ? tcp_v4_rcv+0x686/0x750 > ... > [415964.311319] Active_anon:154810 active_file:131162 inactive_anon:33447 > [415964.311320] inactive_file:690987 unevictable:0 dirty:112116 writeback:0 unstable:0 > [415964.311321] free:8662 slab:965366 mapped:9316 pagetables:4618 bounce:0 > [415964.311325] DMA free:9692kB min:16kB low:20kB high:24kB active_anon:0kB inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB present:8668kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes > [415964.311328] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 3246 7980 7980 > [415964.311333] DMA32 free:21312kB min:6656kB low:8320kB high:9984kB active_anon:118464kB inactive_anon:23908kB active_file:174708kB inactive_file:1206812kB unevictable:0kB present:3324312kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no > [415964.311336] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 4734 4734 > [415964.311341] Normal free:3644kB min:9708kB low:12132kB high:14560kB active_anon:500776kB inactive_anon:109880kB active_file:349940kB inactive_file:1557136kB unevictable:0kB present:4848000kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no > [415964.311344] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0 > ... > > There's simply no memory available in ZONE_NORMAL to satisfy the atomic > allocation; you've been able to allocate beyond the 9708K minimum > watermark because it's GFP_ATOMIC (and then only to 3641K because of > ALLOC_HIGH and ALLOC_HARDER). > > 112116 pages, or 438M of memory, is dirty. > > [415964.311369] 827035 total pagecache pages > [415964.311371] 4728 pages in swap cache > [415964.311373] Swap cache stats: add 12746, delete 8018, find 16878/17480 > [415964.311374] Free swap = 16756356kB > [415964.311375] Total swap = 16787768kB > [415964.312141] 2277376 pages RAM > [415964.312141] 252254 pages reserved > [415964.312141] 546309 pages shared > [415964.312141] 1520221 pages non-shared > > And since you have an 8G machine, that value is only about half of the > default dirty_background_ratio setting of 10 to start pdflush from writing > it out. > > What is suspect is almost half of your system's memory is consumed by > slab. Have you been able to collect slabtop -o when these failures happen > to determine whether this is a duplicate of > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13518 ? > As of yet, the problem has not recurred, when it does, will pull slabtop -o output. Justin. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13648] nfsd: page allocation failure 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-19 21:36 ` David Rientjes -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: David Rientjes @ 2009-07-19 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Justin Piszcz, Stephan von Krawcynski On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13648 > Subject : nfsd: page allocation failure > Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com> > Date : 2009-06-22 12:08 (15 days old) > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/22/309 > Stephan von Krawczynski has this problem with e1000e (but not e1000 or tg3) at least as far back as 2.6.28, so this doesn't appear to be a regression introduced in 2.6.30. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13648] nfsd: page allocation failure @ 2009-07-19 21:36 ` David Rientjes 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: David Rientjes @ 2009-07-19 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Justin Piszcz, Stephan von Krawcynski On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13648 > Subject : nfsd: page allocation failure > Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz-BP4nVm5VUdNhbmWW9KSYcQ@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2009-06-22 12:08 (15 days old) > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/22/309 > Stephan von Krawczynski has this problem with e1000e (but not e1000 or tg3) at least as far back as 2.6.28, so this doesn't appear to be a regression introduced in 2.6.30. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13649] Bad page state in process with various applications 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maxim Levitsky, Mel Gorman This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13649 Subject : Bad page state in process with various applications Submitter : Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-20 15:27 (17 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=124551168828090&w=4 Handled-By : Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/33130/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13649] Bad page state in process with various applications @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maxim Levitsky, Mel Gorman This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13649 Subject : Bad page state in process with various applications Submitter : Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-20 15:27 (17 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=124551168828090&w=4 Handled-By : Mel Gorman <mel-wPRd99KPJ+uzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/33130/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13651] Anyone know what happened with PC speaker in 2.6.30? 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Frans Pop, Ken Witherow, Michael Tokarev, Takashi Iwai This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13651 Subject : Anyone know what happened with PC speaker in 2.6.30? Submitter : Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> Date : 2009-06-15 14:41 (22 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124507695427817&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13651] Anyone know what happened with PC speaker in 2.6.30? @ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Frans Pop, Ken Witherow, Michael Tokarev, Takashi Iwai This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13651 Subject : Anyone know what happened with PC speaker in 2.6.30? Submitter : Michael Tokarev <mjt-XAri/EZa3C4vJsYlp49lxw@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-15 14:41 (22 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124507695427817&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13651] Anyone know what happened with PC speaker in 2.6.30? 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (?) @ 2009-07-07 19:13 ` Frans Pop 2009-07-07 20:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 1 reply; 336+ messages in thread From: Frans Pop @ 2009-07-07 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ken Witherow, Michael Tokarev, Takashi Iwai On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13651 > Subject : Anyone know what happened with PC speaker in 2.6.30? > Submitter : Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> > Date : 2009-06-15 14:41 (22 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124507695427817&w=4 Given the last comments from Michael I think this should be closed as "not a bug". The observed behavior is intended. See: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/232. Cheers, FJP ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13651] Anyone know what happened with PC speaker in 2.6.30? @ 2009-07-07 20:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Frans Pop, Michael Tokarev Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ken Witherow, Takashi Iwai On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Frans Pop wrote: > On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13651 > > Subject : Anyone know what happened with PC speaker in 2.6.30? > > Submitter : Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> > > Date : 2009-06-15 14:41 (22 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124507695427817&w=4 > > Given the last comments from Michael I think this should be closed as "not > a bug". The observed behavior is intended. > See: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/232. Well, I guess the regression here is the apparent lack of documentation, but now that the problem has been discussed, I guess this is not a problem any more. Best, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13651] Anyone know what happened with PC speaker in 2.6.30? @ 2009-07-07 20:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Frans Pop, Michael Tokarev Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ken Witherow, Takashi Iwai On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Frans Pop wrote: > On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13651 > > Subject : Anyone know what happened with PC speaker in 2.6.30? > > Submitter : Michael Tokarev <mjt-XAri/EZa3C4vJsYlp49lxw@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2009-06-15 14:41 (22 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124507695427817&w=4 > > Given the last comments from Michael I think this should be closed as "not > a bug". The observed behavior is intended. > See: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/232. Well, I guess the regression here is the apparent lack of documentation, but now that the problem has been discussed, I guess this is not a problem any more. Best, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13660] Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Joao Correia This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13660 Subject : Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs Submitter : Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-27 16:07 (10 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/95 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13660] Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs @ 2009-07-07 0:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Joao Correia This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13660 Subject : Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs Submitter : Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-27 16:07 (10 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/95 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related) 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Etienne Basset, Jeff Chua This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13663 Subject : suspend to ram regression (IDE related) Submitter : Etienne Basset <etienne.basset@numericable.fr> Date : 2009-06-26 17:40 (11 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/26/242 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/126 Handled-By : Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/32719/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related) @ 2009-07-07 0:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Etienne Basset, Jeff Chua This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13663 Subject : suspend to ram regression (IDE related) Submitter : Etienne Basset <etienne.basset-Bf/eaXMDFuuXqB7oj33eUg@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-26 17:40 (11 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/26/242 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/126 Handled-By : Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/32719/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related) 2009-07-07 0:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 18:02 ` Etienne Basset -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Etienne Basset @ 2009-07-07 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Jeff Chua Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13663 > Subject : suspend to ram regression (IDE related) > Submitter : Etienne Basset <etienne.basset@numericable.fr> > Date : 2009-06-26 17:40 (11 days old) > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/26/242 > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/126 > Handled-By : Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com> > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/32719/ > > > hello, current git is OK, patch is not yet in 2.6.30-stable regards Etienne ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related) @ 2009-07-07 18:02 ` Etienne Basset 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Etienne Basset @ 2009-07-07 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Jeff Chua Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13663 > Subject : suspend to ram regression (IDE related) > Submitter : Etienne Basset <etienne.basset-Bf/eaXMDFuuXqB7oj33eUg@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2009-06-26 17:40 (11 days old) > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/26/242 > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/126 > Handled-By : Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/32719/ > > > hello, current git is OK, patch is not yet in 2.6.30-stable regards Etienne ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13669] Kernel bug with dock driver 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, Joerg Platte This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13669 Subject : Kernel bug with dock driver Submitter : Joerg Platte <jplatte@naasa.net> Date : 2009-06-14 21:00 (23 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/14/216 Handled-By : Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13669] Kernel bug with dock driver @ 2009-07-07 0:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, Joerg Platte This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13669 Subject : Kernel bug with dock driver Submitter : Joerg Platte <jplatte-v18Uk5sXZWJeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-14 21:00 (23 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/14/216 Handled-By : Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh-N3TV7GIv+o9fyO9Q7EP/yw@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13668] Can't boot 2.6.30 powerpc kernel under qemu. 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Jeremy Kerr, Rob Landley This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13668 Subject : Can't boot 2.6.30 powerpc kernel under qemu. Submitter : Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> Date : 2009-06-27 18:08 (10 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/159 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13668] Can't boot 2.6.30 powerpc kernel under qemu. @ 2009-07-07 0:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Jeremy Kerr, Rob Landley This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13668 Subject : Can't boot 2.6.30 powerpc kernel under qemu. Submitter : Rob Landley <rob-VoJi6FS/r0vR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-27 18:08 (10 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/159 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13668] Can't boot 2.6.30 powerpc kernel under qemu. 2009-07-07 0:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (?) @ 2009-07-07 2:49 ` Rob Landley 2009-07-07 11:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 1 reply; 336+ messages in thread From: Rob Landley @ 2009-07-07 2:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Jeremy Kerr On Monday 06 July 2009 19:01:05 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13668 > Subject : Can't boot 2.6.30 powerpc kernel under qemu. > Submitter : Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> > Date : 2009-06-27 18:08 (10 days old) > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/159 Resolved, it just required a configuration change. Rob -- Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13668] Can't boot 2.6.30 powerpc kernel under qemu. @ 2009-07-07 11:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 11:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rob Landley Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Jeremy Kerr On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Rob Landley wrote: > On Monday 06 July 2009 19:01:05 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13668 > > Subject : Can't boot 2.6.30 powerpc kernel under qemu. > > Submitter : Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> > > Date : 2009-06-27 18:08 (10 days old) > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/159 > > Resolved, it just required a configuration change. Thanks, closed. Best, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13668] Can't boot 2.6.30 powerpc kernel under qemu. @ 2009-07-07 11:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 11:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rob Landley Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Jeremy Kerr On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Rob Landley wrote: > On Monday 06 July 2009 19:01:05 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13668 > > Subject : Can't boot 2.6.30 powerpc kernel under qemu. > > Submitter : Rob Landley <rob-VoJi6FS/r0vR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2009-06-27 18:08 (10 days old) > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/159 > > Resolved, it just required a configuration change. Thanks, closed. Best, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13681] A number of usb Devices causes Oops messages and kernel panics. 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexander Kaltsas This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13681 Subject : A number of usb Devices causes Oops messages and kernel panics. Submitter : Alexander Kaltsas <alexkaltsas@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-30 13:06 (7 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13681] A number of usb Devices causes Oops messages and kernel panics. @ 2009-07-07 0:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexander Kaltsas This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13681 Subject : A number of usb Devices causes Oops messages and kernel panics. Submitter : Alexander Kaltsas <alexkaltsas-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-30 13:06 (7 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13682] The webcam stopped working when upgrading from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Nathanael Schaeffer This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13682 Subject : The webcam stopped working when upgrading from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30 Submitter : Nathanael Schaeffer <nathanael.schaeffer@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-30 13:34 (7 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13682] The webcam stopped working when upgrading from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30 @ 2009-07-07 0:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Nathanael Schaeffer This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13682 Subject : The webcam stopped working when upgrading from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30 Submitter : Nathanael Schaeffer <nathanael.schaeffer-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-30 13:34 (7 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13682] The webcam stopped working when upgrading from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30 2009-07-07 0:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 7:32 ` Oliver Neukum -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Oliver Neukum @ 2009-07-07 7:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Nathanael Schaeffer Am Dienstag, 7. Juli 2009 02:01:07 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13682 > Subject : The webcam stopped working when upgrading from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30 > Submitter : Nathanael Schaeffer <nathanael.schaeffer@gmail.com> > Date : 2009-06-30 13:34 (7 days old) This is caused by selecting a format (no longer / not) supported. Please make an strace of the failing programm so we know what it requests. Regards Oliver ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13682] The webcam stopped working when upgrading from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30 @ 2009-07-07 7:32 ` Oliver Neukum 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Oliver Neukum @ 2009-07-07 7:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Nathanael Schaeffer Am Dienstag, 7. Juli 2009 02:01:07 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13682 > Subject : The webcam stopped working when upgrading from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30 > Submitter : Nathanael Schaeffer <nathanael.schaeffer-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2009-06-30 13:34 (7 days old) This is caused by selecting a format (no longer / not) supported. Please make an strace of the failing programm so we know what it requests. Regards Oliver ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13694] i915 phantom TV 2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciek Józiewicz This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13694 Subject : i915 phantom TV Submitter : Maciek Józiewicz <mjoziew@gmail.com> Date : 2009-07-02 12:26 (5 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13694] i915 phantom TV @ 2009-07-07 0:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciek Józiewicz This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13694 Subject : i915 phantom TV Submitter : Maciek Józiewicz <mjoziew-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-07-02 12:26 (5 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2.6.31] mac80211: fix suspend
@ 2009-07-28 16:10 Johannes Berg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Berg @ 2009-07-28 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Linville
Cc: Jan Scholz, linux-wireless, Bob Copeland, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Tomas Janousek
Jan reported that his b43-based laptop hangs during suspend.
The problem turned out to be mac80211 asking the driver to
stop the hardware before removing interfaces, and interface
removal caused b43 to touch the hardware (while down, which
causes the hang).
This patch fixes mac80211 to do reorder these operations to
have them in the correct order -- first remove interfaces
and then stop the hardware. Some more code is necessary to
be able to do so in a race-free manner, in particular it is
necessary to not process frames received during quiescing.
Fixes http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13337.
Reported-by: Jan Scholz <scholz@fias.uni-frankfurt.de>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
---
net/mac80211/pm.c | 24 +++++++++++++++---------
net/mac80211/rx.c | 12 ++++++++++++
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- wireless-testing.orig/net/mac80211/pm.c 2009-07-28 17:58:11.000000000 +0200
+++ wireless-testing/net/mac80211/pm.c 2009-07-28 18:06:25.000000000 +0200
@@ -54,15 +54,6 @@ int __ieee80211_suspend(struct ieee80211
rcu_read_unlock();
- /* flush again, in case driver queued work */
- flush_workqueue(local->hw.workqueue);
-
- /* stop hardware - this must stop RX */
- if (local->open_count) {
- ieee80211_led_radio(local, false);
- drv_stop(local);
- }
-
/* remove STAs */
spin_lock_bh(&local->sta_lock);
list_for_each_entry(sta, &local->sta_list, list) {
@@ -110,7 +101,22 @@ int __ieee80211_suspend(struct ieee80211
drv_remove_interface(local, &conf);
}
+ /* stop hardware - this must stop RX */
+ if (local->open_count) {
+ ieee80211_led_radio(local, false);
+ drv_stop(local);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * flush again, in case driver queued work -- it
+ * shouldn't be doing (or cancel everything in the
+ * stop callback) that but better safe than sorry.
+ */
+ flush_workqueue(local->hw.workqueue);
+
local->suspended = true;
+ /* need suspended to be visible before quiescing is false */
+ barrier();
local->quiescing = false;
return 0;
--- wireless-testing.orig/net/mac80211/rx.c 2009-07-28 17:58:52.000000000 +0200
+++ wireless-testing/net/mac80211/rx.c 2009-07-28 18:04:24.000000000 +0200
@@ -2441,6 +2441,18 @@ void __ieee80211_rx(struct ieee80211_hw
return;
}
+ /*
+ * If we're suspending, it is possible although not too likely
+ * that we'd be receiving frames after having already partially
+ * quiesced the stack. We can't process such frames then since
+ * that might, for example, cause stations to be added or other
+ * driver callbacks be invoked.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(local->quiescing || local->suspended)) {
+ kfree_skb(skb);
+ return;
+ }
+
if (status->flag & RX_FLAG_HT) {
/* rate_idx is MCS index */
if (WARN_ON(status->rate_idx < 0 ||
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread* 2.6.31-rc1-git3: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 @ 2009-06-29 0:26 Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-06-29 0:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-06-29 0:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI [NOTES: * I hope you notice the jump of the number of reported regressions after 2.6.30 was released. * Please let me know which of these bugs have been fixed already (ideally please also provide the name of the fix commit). * The post-2.6.30 reports were flooded by the megre window noise that made them very difficult to track.] This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2009-06-29 133 46 43 2009-06-07 110 35 31 2009-05-31 100 32 27 2009-05-24 92 34 27 2009-05-16 81 36 33 2009-04-25 55 36 26 2009-04-17 37 35 28 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13669 Subject : Kernel bug with dock driver Submitter : Joerg Platte <jplatte@naasa.net> Date : 2009-06-14 21:00 (15 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/14/216 Handled-By : Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13668 Subject : Can't boot 2.6.30 powerpc kernel under qemu. Submitter : Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> Date : 2009-06-27 18:08 (2 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/159 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13660 Subject : Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs Submitter : Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-27 16:07 (2 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/95 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13651 Subject : Anyone know what happened with PC speaker in 2.6.30? Submitter : Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> Date : 2009-06-15 14:41 (14 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124507695427817&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13649 Subject : Bad page state in process with various applications Submitter : Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-20 15:27 (9 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=124551168828090&w=4 Handled-By : Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13648 Subject : nfsd: page allocation failure Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com> Date : 2009-06-22 12:08 (7 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/22/309 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13647 Subject : fb/mmap lockdep report. Submitter : Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Date : 2009-06-21 13:33 (8 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=513adb58685615b0b1d47a3f0d40f5352beff189 References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/90 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/122 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13646 Subject : warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2009-06-19 17:05 (10 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/19/187 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13644 Subject : hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net> Date : 2009-06-16 01:27 (13 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/15/630 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13634 Subject : [drm:drm_wait_vblank] failed to acquire vblank counter Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz> Date : 2009-06-27 07:02 (2 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13624 Subject : usb: wrong autosuspend initialization Submitter : <list@phuk.ath.cx> Date : 2009-06-25 18:18 (4 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13621 Subject : xfs hangs with assertion failed Submitter : Johannes Engel <jcnengel@googlemail.com> Date : 2009-06-25 10:07 (4 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13620 Subject : acpi_enforce_resources broken - conflicting i2c module loaded on some EeePCs Submitter : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk> Date : 2009-06-25 08:31 (4 days old) References : <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-eeepc-devel/2009-June/002316.html> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13613 Subject : lockups with JFS (inconsistent lock state) Submitter : Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak <kas@fi.muni.cz> Date : 2009-06-24 09:35 (5 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13581 Subject : ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels Submitter : Matteo <rootkit85@yahoo.it> Date : 2009-06-19 12:04 (10 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13558 Subject : Tracelog during resume Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz> Date : 2009-06-17 11:32 (12 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13554 Subject : linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window Submitter : Jos van Wolput <wolput@onsneteindhoven.nl> Date : 2009-06-17 06:28 (12 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528 Subject : au0828: major drop in reception quality between 2.6.29.4 and 2.6.30 on HVR-950q Submitter : Jim Faulkner <jfaulkne@ccs.neu.edu> Date : 2009-06-13 19:34 (16 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13518 Subject : slab grows with NFS write activity. Submitter : Andrew Randrianasulu <randrik@mail.ru> Date : 2009-06-12 09:51 (17 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13514 Subject : acer_wmi causes stack corruption Submitter : Rus <harbour@sfinx.od.ua> Date : 2009-06-12 08:13 (17 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13512 Subject : D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore Submitter : Daniel Smolik <marvin@mydatex.cz> Date : 2009-06-11 20:12 (18 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13502 Subject : GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1 Submitter : <sveina@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-10 20:04 (19 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13472 Subject : Oops with minicom and USB serial Submitter : Peter Chubb <peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au> Date : 2009-06-05 1:37 (24 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124416901026700&w=4 Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13471 Subject : Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled Submitter : Ozan Çağlayan <ozan@pardus.org.tr> Date : 2009-06-04 9:12 (25 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124410667532558&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13424 Subject : possible deadlock when doing governor switching Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Date : 2009-05-31 16:36 (29 days old) References : http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg00711.html Handled-By : Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13408 Subject : Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7 Submitter : Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com> Date : 2009-05-30 18:51 (30 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/30/146 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13407 Subject : adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram Submitter : Jan Scholz <scholz@fias.uni-frankfurt.de> Date : 2009-05-28 7:59 (32 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ed8d2b3a81bdbb0418301628ccdb008ac9f40b7 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124349762314976&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13401 Subject : pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected) Submitter : Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@free.fr> Date : 2009-05-28 18:43 (32 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13374 Subject : reiserfs blocked for more than 120secs Submitter : Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@t-online.de> Date : 2009-05-23 8:52 (37 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124306880410811&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/29/389 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13373 Subject : fbcon, intelfb, i915: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> Date : 2009-05-23 5:08 (37 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124305538130702&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362 Subject : rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap Submitter : Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com> Date : 2009-05-22 13:32 (38 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13351 Subject : 2.6.30 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk Submitter : <unggnu@googlemail.com> Date : 2009-05-20 14:09 (40 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=78a8b35bc7abf8b8333d6f625e08c0f7cc1c3742 Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13341 Subject : Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules Submitter : <patrick@ostenberg.de> Date : 2009-05-19 09:08 (41 days old) Handled-By : Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13337 Subject : [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules Submitter : Tomas Janousek <tomi@nomi.cz> Date : 2009-05-18 10:59 (42 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13328 Subject : b44: eth0: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 00000002 of register 42c to clear. Submitter : Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com> Date : 2009-05-03 16:22 (57 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124136778012280&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319 Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (61 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136 Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13318 Subject : AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2 Submitter : Karsten Mehrhoff <kawime@gmx.de> Date : 2009-04-30 8:51 (60 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=59de2bebabc5027f93df999d59cc65df591c3e6e References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124108156417560&w=4 Handled-By : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13306 Subject : hibernate slow on _second_ run Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Date : 2009-05-14 09:34 (46 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13277 Subject : 2.6.30 regression - hang on 2nd resume - bisected - Thinkpad X40 Submitter : Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Date : 2009-05-11 10:08 (49 days old) Handled-By : Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13219 Subject : Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.4 Submitter : David Hill <hilld@binarystorm.net> Date : 2009-05-01 16:57 (59 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13179 Subject : CD-R: wodim intermittent failures Submitter : Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org> Date : 2009-04-21 1:52 (69 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124027879214231&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13119 Subject : Trouble with make-install from a NFS mount Submitter : Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Date : 2009-04-14 21:32 (76 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123974482327044&w=4 Handled-By : H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13109 Subject : High latency on /sys/class/thermal Submitter : Tiago Simões Batista <tiagosbatista@gmail.com> Date : 2009-04-11 14:56 (79 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123946182301248&w=4 Handled-By : Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13663 Subject : suspend to ram regression (IDE related) Submitter : Etienne Basset <etienne.basset@numericable.fr> Date : 2009-06-26 17:40 (3 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/26/242 Handled-By : Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/32719/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13475 Subject : suspend/hibernate lockdep warning Submitter : Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> Date : 2009-06-02 10:00 (27 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124393723321241&w=4 Handled-By : Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/28660/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389 Subject : Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2009-05-26 15:24 (34 days old) Handled-By : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672 For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13070 Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13647] fb/mmap lockdep report. 2009-06-29 0:26 2.6.31-rc1-git3: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-06-29 0:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-06-29 0:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrea Righi, Dave Jones, Jarek Poplawski This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13647 Subject : fb/mmap lockdep report. Submitter : Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Date : 2009-06-21 13:33 (8 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=513adb58685615b0b1d47a3f0d40f5352beff189 References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/90 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/122 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13647] fb/mmap lockdep report. @ 2009-06-29 0:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 336+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-06-29 0:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrea Righi, Dave Jones, Jarek Poplawski This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13647 Subject : fb/mmap lockdep report. Submitter : Dave Jones <davej-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-06-21 13:33 (8 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=513adb58685615b0b1d47a3f0d40f5352beff189 References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/90 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/122 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 336+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-08-04 11:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 336+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-07-06 23:57 2.6.31-rc2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-06 23:57 ` [Bug #13109] High latency on /sys/class/thermal Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-06 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13277] 2.6.30 regression - hang on 2nd resume - bisected - Thinkpad X40 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13119] Trouble with make-install from a NFS mount Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13179] CD-R: wodim intermittent failures Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13219] Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.4 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13306] hibernate slow on _second_ run Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:12 ` Johannes Berg
2009-07-07 0:12 ` Johannes Berg
2009-07-07 10:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 10:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 11:27 ` Johannes Berg
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 1:05 ` Larry Finger
2009-07-07 1:05 ` Larry Finger
2009-07-07 6:29 ` David Rientjes
2009-07-07 6:29 ` David Rientjes
2009-07-07 6:57 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-07-07 6:57 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-07-08 13:18 ` Larry Finger
2009-07-08 13:18 ` Larry Finger
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13318] AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 2:12 ` Shaohua Li
2009-07-07 2:12 ` Shaohua Li
2009-07-07 11:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 11:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 11:46 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13328] b44: eth0: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 00000002 of register 42c to clear Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-08 22:02 ` Jan Scholz
2009-07-08 22:02 ` Jan Scholz
2009-07-09 15:14 ` Jan Scholz
2009-07-09 15:14 ` Jan Scholz
2009-07-09 20:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-09 20:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-09 20:28 ` Johannes Berg
2009-07-09 20:28 ` Johannes Berg
2009-07-09 20:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-09 20:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-11 14:07 ` Jan Scholz
2009-07-11 14:07 ` Jan Scholz
2009-07-11 14:36 ` Johannes Berg
2009-07-11 14:36 ` Johannes Berg
2009-07-11 17:20 ` Jan Scholz
2009-07-11 17:20 ` Jan Scholz
2009-07-11 17:47 ` Johannes Berg
2009-07-11 17:47 ` Johannes Berg
2009-07-26 20:41 ` 2.6.31-rc4: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:41 ` [Bug #13109] High latency on /sys/class/thermal Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-27 0:17 ` Larry Finger
2009-07-27 0:17 ` Larry Finger
2009-07-27 0:24 ` David Rientjes
2009-07-27 0:24 ` David Rientjes
2009-07-27 7:08 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-07-27 7:08 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-07-27 9:37 ` David Rientjes
2009-07-27 9:37 ` David Rientjes
2009-07-27 17:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-07-27 17:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-07-27 18:16 ` David Rientjes
2009-07-27 18:16 ` David Rientjes
2009-07-27 21:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-07-27 21:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-07-27 22:38 ` David Rientjes
2009-07-28 1:30 ` [patch] slub: use size and objsize orders to disable debug flags David Rientjes
2009-07-28 1:30 ` David Rientjes
2009-07-28 7:53 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-07-28 7:53 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-03 14:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-03 14:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13341] Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13318] AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13219] Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.4 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13306] hibernate slow on _second_ run Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-27 8:16 ` Johannes Berg
2009-07-27 8:16 ` Johannes Berg
2009-07-27 21:09 ` [Bug 13306] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13328] b44: eth0: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 00000002 of register 42c to clear Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13351] 2.6.30 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13389] Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-27 1:22 ` Frans Pop
2009-07-27 1:22 ` Frans Pop
[not found] ` <200907270322.47523.elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-27 21:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-27 21:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-02 13:45 ` Alejandro Riveira Fernández
2009-08-02 13:45 ` Alejandro Riveira Fernández
2009-08-02 20:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-02 20:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13373] fbcon, intelfb, i915: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13401] pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13374] reiserfs blocked for more than 120secs Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13407] adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-28 14:49 ` Jan Scholz
2009-07-28 14:49 ` Jan Scholz
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13424] possible deadlock when doing governor switching Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-27 16:48 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-07-27 16:48 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-07-27 21:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-27 21:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13408] Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13471] Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-31 14:14 ` Alan Cox
[not found] ` <20090731151417.568094e5-qBU/x9rampVanCEyBjwyrvXRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-31 15:08 ` Ozan Çağlayan
2009-07-31 15:08 ` Ozan Çağlayan
2009-07-31 15:08 ` Ozan Çağlayan
2009-07-31 15:17 ` Alan Cox
[not found] ` <20090731161735.6a94ad9c-qBU/x9rampVanCEyBjwyrvXRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-04 11:33 ` Ozan Çağlayan
2009-08-04 11:33 ` Ozan Çağlayan
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13554] linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13472] Oops with minicom and USB serial Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-27 14:40 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-27 14:40 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-27 21:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13502] GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13514] acer_wmi causes stack corruption Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13518] slab grows with NFS write activity Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13475] suspend/hibernate lockdep warning Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-27 1:59 ` Dave Young
2009-07-27 1:59 ` Dave Young
2009-07-27 16:52 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-07-27 16:52 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-07-27 21:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-27 21:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13512] D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13564] random general protection fault at boot time caused by khubd Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13620] acpi_enforce_resources broken - conflicting i2c module loaded on some EeePCs Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13583] pdflush uses 5% CPU on otherwise idle system Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13558] Tracelog during resume Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13581] ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13638] rt2870 driver is broken for (some) cards Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13634] [drm:drm_wait_vblank] *ERROR* failed to acquire vblank counter, -22 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13624] usb: wrong autosuspend initialization Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-27 14:42 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-27 14:42 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-27 14:44 ` list
2009-07-27 14:44 ` list-2tUql6aCh3Vfq8cQ1yknNg
2009-07-27 15:09 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-27 15:09 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-27 21:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-27 21:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13621] xfs hangs with assertion failed Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13646] warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13660] Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13648] nfsd: page allocation failure Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-27 11:04 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2009-07-27 22:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-27 22:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-30 21:30 ` David Rientjes
2009-07-31 11:48 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2009-07-31 11:48 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13644] hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13649] Bad page state in process with various applications Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-27 9:05 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-07-27 9:05 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-07-27 22:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-27 22:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13669] Kernel bug with dock driver Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13694] i915 phantom TV Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13681] A number of usb Devices causes Oops messages and kernel panics Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-29 13:29 ` Greg KH
2009-07-29 13:29 ` Greg KH
2009-07-29 21:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-29 21:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13682] The webcam stopped working when upgrading from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13795] abnormal boot and no suspend due to 'async' (fastboot) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13780] NULL pointer dereference loading powernowk8 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-30 22:16 ` David Rientjes
2009-07-30 22:16 ` David Rientjes
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13739] 2.6.30 leaking keys on console switch Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13751] oops on HP/Compaq 6910p lid closure Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13797] iBook G4 doesn't suspend since 2ed8d2b3a8 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-27 22:23 ` Jörg Sommer
2009-07-27 22:23 ` Jörg Sommer
2009-07-28 14:40 ` [Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules Jan Scholz
2009-07-28 15:26 ` Johannes Berg
2009-07-28 15:26 ` Johannes Berg
2009-07-28 21:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-28 23:51 ` [PATCH 2.6.31] mac80211: fix suspend Jan Scholz
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13341] Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13351] 2.6.30 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 10:06 ` Alejandro Riveira Fernández
2009-07-07 10:06 ` Alejandro Riveira Fernández
2009-07-07 11:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 11:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13374] reiserfs blocked for more than 120secs Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13373] fbcon, intelfb, i915: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13389] Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 19:19 ` Frans Pop
2009-07-07 19:19 ` Frans Pop
2009-07-07 20:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 20:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-08 0:56 ` Zhang Rui
2009-07-08 0:56 ` Zhang Rui
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13401] pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13407] adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13424] possible deadlock when doing governor switching Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13408] Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13471] Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13475] suspend/hibernate lockdep warning Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13502] GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13472] Oops with minicom and USB serial Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13512] D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13518] slab grows with NFS write activity Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13514] acer_wmi causes stack corruption Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13554] linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-20 21:35 ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-20 21:35 ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13558] Tracelog during resume Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13620] acpi_enforce_resources broken - conflicting i2c module loaded on some EeePCs Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13564] random general protection fault at boot time caused by khubd Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13581] ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13583] pdflush uses 5% CPU on otherwise idle system Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13621] xfs hangs with assertion failed Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13624] usb: wrong autosuspend initialization Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:22 ` list
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13634] [drm:drm_wait_vblank] *ERROR* failed to acquire vblank counter, -22 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13638] rt2870 driver is broken for (some) cards Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13644] hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13646] warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13647] fb/mmap lockdep report Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 5:57 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-07 5:57 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-07 11:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 11:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13648] nfsd: page allocation failure Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 3:55 ` David Rientjes
2009-07-07 3:55 ` David Rientjes
2009-07-07 8:01 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-07-19 21:36 ` David Rientjes
2009-07-19 21:36 ` David Rientjes
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13649] Bad page state in process with various applications Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13651] Anyone know what happened with PC speaker in 2.6.30? Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 19:13 ` Frans Pop
2009-07-07 20:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 20:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:01 ` [Bug #13660] Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:01 ` [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 18:02 ` Etienne Basset
2009-07-07 18:02 ` Etienne Basset
2009-07-07 0:01 ` [Bug #13669] Kernel bug with dock driver Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:01 ` [Bug #13668] Can't boot 2.6.30 powerpc kernel under qemu Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 2:49 ` Rob Landley
2009-07-07 11:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 11:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:01 ` [Bug #13681] A number of usb Devices causes Oops messages and kernel panics Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:01 ` [Bug #13682] The webcam stopped working when upgrading from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 7:32 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-07-07 7:32 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-07-07 0:01 ` [Bug #13694] i915 phantom TV Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-07-28 16:10 [PATCH 2.6.31] mac80211: fix suspend Johannes Berg
2009-06-29 0:26 2.6.31-rc1-git3: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-29 0:31 ` [Bug #13647] fb/mmap lockdep report Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-29 0:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.