* 2.6.31-rc6-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.30
@ 2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.30, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.30, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the
entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2009-08-20 102 32 29
2009-08-10 89 27 24
2009-08-02 76 36 28
2009-07-27 70 51 43
2009-07-07 35 25 21
2009-06-29 22 22 15
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14018
Subject : kernel freezes, inotify problem
Submitter : Christoph Thielecke <christoph.thielecke-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-19 12:48 (1 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125068616818353&w=4
Handled-By : Eric Paris <eparis-FjpueFixGhCM4zKIHC2jIg@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14016
Subject : mm/ipw2200 regression
Submitter : Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-15 16:56 (5 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125036437221408&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14015
Subject : pty regressed again, breaking expect and gcc's testsuite
Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe-1zs4UD6AkMk@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-14 23:41 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125029329805643&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14014
Subject : kernel bug at shut down
Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining-DX+603jRYB8@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-14 9:11 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125024112418870&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14013
Subject : hd don't show up
Submitter : Tim Blechmann <tim-xpEK/MU0Hawdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-14 8:26 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125023842514480&w=4
Handled-By : Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14012
Subject : latest git fried my x86_64 imac
Submitter : Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-13 07:20 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014080427090&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14011
Subject : Kernel paging request failed in kmem_cache_alloc
Submitter : Matthias Dahl <ml_kernel-Rk1lLwyeSiSCvTm3UDtA3g@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-10 22:26 (10 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124993603825082&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14003
Subject : Infinite loop on bootup while handling DMAR
Submitter : Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <bero-9zdaV+82baBg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-18 14:54 (2 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14002
Subject : WARNING: at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:154 inet_sock_destruct+0x164/0x1c0()
Submitter : Ralf Hildebrandt <ralf.hildebrandt-jq1tPX9l7E6ELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-18 12:37 (2 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13987
Subject : Received NMI interrupt at resume
Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-15 07:55 (5 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13960
Subject : rtl8187 not connect to wifi
Submitter : okias <d.okias-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-10 19:16 (10 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13950
Subject : Oops when USB Serial disconnected while in use
Submitter : Bruno Prémont <bonbons-ud5FBsm0p/xEiooADzr8i9i2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-08 17:47 (12 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124975432900466&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13947
Subject : Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
Submitter : Daniel Mack <daniel-rDUAYElUppE@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-07 19:11 (13 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=57921c312e8cef72ba35a4cfe870b376da0b1b87
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124967234311481&w=4
Handled-By : Roel Kluin <roel.kluin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-06 20:15 (14 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124958978600600&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13942
Subject : Troubles with AoE and uninitialized object
Submitter : Bruno Prémont <bonbons-ud5FBsm0p/xEiooADzr8i9i2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-04 10:12 (16 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124938117104811&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
Subject : x86 Geode issue
Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (17 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940
Subject : iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
Submitter : Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira <storm@sys49152.net>
Date : 2009-08-07 22:33 (13 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968457731107&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13935
Subject : 2.6.31-rcX breaks Apple MightyMouse (Bluetooth version)
Submitter : Adrian Ulrich <kernel-4ZM2p5qjiQGewZBzVTKGGg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-08 22:08 (12 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=fa047e4f6fa63a6e9d0ae4d7749538830d14a343
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13914
Subject : e1000e reports invalid NVM Checksum on 82566DM-2 (bisected)
Submitter : <jsbronder-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-04 18:06 (16 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13906
Subject : Huawei E169 GPRS connection causes Ooops
Submitter : Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-04 09:02 (16 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13899
Subject : Oops from tar, 2.6.31-rc5, 32 bit on quad core phenom.
Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett-H+0wwilmMs3R7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-01 13:04 (19 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124913190304149&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13869
Subject : Radeon framebuffer (w/o KMS) corruption at boot.
Submitter : Duncan <1i5t5.duncan-j9pdmedNgrk@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-07-29 16:44 (22 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13848
Subject : iwlwifi (4965) regression since 2.6.30
Submitter : Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman-8qz54MUs51PtwjQa/ONI9g@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-07-26 7:57 (25 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124859658502866&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13836
Subject : suspend script fails, related to stdout?
Submitter : Tomas M. <tmezzadra-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-07-17 21:24 (34 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124785853811667&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13819
Subject : system freeze when switching to console
Submitter : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-07-23 17:57 (28 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13809
Subject : oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Jerome Marchand <jmarchan-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-07-22 13:35 (29 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13740
Subject : X server crashes with 2.6.31-rc2 when options are changed
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-07-07 15:19 (44 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13733
Subject : 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared
Submitter : Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-07-06 18:32 (45 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124690524027166&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13645
Subject : NULL pointer dereference at (null) (level2_spare_pgt)
Submitter : poornima nayak <mpnayak-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-06-17 17:56 (64 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/17/194
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14017
Subject : _end symbol missing from Symbol.map
Submitter : Hannes Reinecke <hare-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-13 6:45 (7 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=091e52c3551d3031343df24b573b770b4c6c72b6
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014649102253&w=4
Handled-By : Hannes Reinecke <hare-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014649102253&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13948
Subject : ath5k broken after suspend-to-ram
Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js-FF7aIK3TAVNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-07 21:51 (13 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968192727854&w=4
Handled-By : Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/38550/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13946
Subject : x86 MCE malfunction on Thinkpad T42p
Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js-FF7aIK3TAVNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-07 17:09 (13 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124966500232399&w=4
Handled-By : Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/37908/
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.30,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13615
Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13645] NULL pointer dereference at (null) (level2_spare_pgt)
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
@ 2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, poornima nayak
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13645
Subject : NULL pointer dereference at (null) (level2_spare_pgt)
Submitter : poornima nayak <mpnayak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-06-17 17:56 (64 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/17/194
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13733] 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
(?)
@ 2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Niel Lambrechts
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13733
Subject : 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared
Submitter : Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-06 18:32 (45 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124690524027166&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13809] oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jerome Marchand
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13809
Subject : oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Date : 2009-07-22 13:35 (29 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread* [Bug #13819] system freeze when switching to console
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-19 23:35 ` reinette chatre
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Eric Anholt, ling.ma, Linus Torvalds,
Ma Ling, Reinette Chatre
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13819
Subject : system freeze when switching to console
Submitter : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Date : 2009-07-23 17:57 (28 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #13819] system freeze when switching to console
2009-08-19 20:26 ` [Bug #13819] system freeze when switching to console Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-19 23:35 ` reinette chatre
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: reinette chatre @ 2009-08-19 23:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Eric Anholt, Ma,
Ling, Linus Torvalds
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 13:26 -0700, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13819
> Subject : system freeze when switching to console
> Submitter : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
> Date : 2009-07-23 17:57 (28 days old)
This issue is still present in 2.6.31-rc6. Unfortunately the patches I
reverted to get a working system does not revert cleanly anymore.
Reinette
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13819] system freeze when switching to console
@ 2009-08-19 23:35 ` reinette chatre
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: reinette chatre @ 2009-08-19 23:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Eric Anholt, Ma,
Ling, Linus Torvalds
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 13:26 -0700, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13819
> Subject : system freeze when switching to console
> Submitter : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-07-23 17:57 (28 days old)
This issue is still present in 2.6.31-rc6. Unfortunately the patches I
reverted to get a working system does not revert cleanly anymore.
Reinette
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13819] system freeze when switching to console
2009-08-19 23:35 ` reinette chatre
@ 2009-08-20 14:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-20 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: reinette chatre
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Eric Anholt, Ma,
Ling, Linus Torvalds
On Thursday 20 August 2009, reinette chatre wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 13:26 -0700, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13819
> > Subject : system freeze when switching to console
> > Submitter : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
> > Date : 2009-07-23 17:57 (28 days old)
>
> This issue is still present in 2.6.31-rc6. Unfortunately the patches I
> reverted to get a working system does not revert cleanly anymore.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13819] system freeze when switching to console
@ 2009-08-20 14:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-20 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: reinette chatre
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Eric Anholt, Ma,
Ling, Linus Torvalds
On Thursday 20 August 2009, reinette chatre wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 13:26 -0700, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13819
> > Subject : system freeze when switching to console
> > Submitter : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-07-23 17:57 (28 days old)
>
> This issue is still present in 2.6.31-rc6. Unfortunately the patches I
> reverted to get a working system does not revert cleanly anymore.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13740] X server crashes with 2.6.31-rc2 when options are changed
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Michael S. Tsirkin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13740
Subject : X server crashes with 2.6.31-rc2 when options are changed
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-07 15:19 (44 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13740] X server crashes with 2.6.31-rc2 when options are changed
@ 2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Michael S. Tsirkin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13740
Subject : X server crashes with 2.6.31-rc2 when options are changed
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-07-07 15:19 (44 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13836] suspend script fails, related to stdout?
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Tomas M.
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13836
Subject : suspend script fails, related to stdout?
Submitter : Tomas M. <tmezzadra@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-17 21:24 (34 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124785853811667&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13906] Huawei E169 GPRS connection causes Ooops
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Clemens Eisserer
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13906
Subject : Huawei E169 GPRS connection causes Ooops
Submitter : Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-04 09:02 (16 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13906] Huawei E169 GPRS connection causes Ooops
@ 2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Clemens Eisserer
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13906
Subject : Huawei E169 GPRS connection causes Ooops
Submitter : Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-04 09:02 (16 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13869] Radeon framebuffer (w/o KMS) corruption at boot.
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Duncan
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13869
Subject : Radeon framebuffer (w/o KMS) corruption at boot.
Submitter : Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
Date : 2009-07-29 16:44 (22 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13869] Radeon framebuffer (w/o KMS) corruption at boot.
@ 2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Duncan
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13869
Subject : Radeon framebuffer (w/o KMS) corruption at boot.
Submitter : Duncan <1i5t5.duncan-j9pdmedNgrk@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-07-29 16:44 (22 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13899] Oops from tar, 2.6.31-rc5, 32 bit on quad core phenom.
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-20 2:51 ` Gene Heskett
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Gene Heskett
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13899
Subject : Oops from tar, 2.6.31-rc5, 32 bit on quad core phenom.
Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>
Date : 2009-08-01 13:04 (19 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124913190304149&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #13899] Oops from tar, 2.6.31-rc5, 32 bit on quad core phenom.
2009-08-19 20:26 ` [Bug #13899] Oops from tar, 2.6.31-rc5, 32 bit on quad core phenom Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-20 2:51 ` Gene Heskett
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Gene Heskett @ 2009-08-20 2:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Wednesday 19 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>of recent regressions.
>
>The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
>(either way).
>
>
>Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13899
>Subject : Oops from tar, 2.6.31-rc5, 32 bit on quad core phenom.
>Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>
>Date : 2009-08-01 13:04 (19 days old)
>References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124913190304149&w=4
I have not seen this since I rebooted to 31-rc6 3.5 days ago. So apparently
something that went into rc6 that was not in rc5, has fixed it. I have had
one kmail crash, but IIRC that was after yum had updated something. I
believe this particular tar related item has been attended to. Close it
out.
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
The NRA is offering FREE Associate memberships to anyone who wants them.
<https://www.nrahq.org/nrabonus/accept-membership.asp>
If *I* had a hammer, there'd be no more folk singers.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13899] Oops from tar, 2.6.31-rc5, 32 bit on quad core phenom.
@ 2009-08-20 2:51 ` Gene Heskett
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Gene Heskett @ 2009-08-20 2:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Wednesday 19 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>of recent regressions.
>
>The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
>(either way).
>
>
>Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13899
>Subject : Oops from tar, 2.6.31-rc5, 32 bit on quad core phenom.
>Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett-H+0wwilmMs3R7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
>Date : 2009-08-01 13:04 (19 days old)
>References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124913190304149&w=4
I have not seen this since I rebooted to 31-rc6 3.5 days ago. So apparently
something that went into rc6 that was not in rc5, has fixed it. I have had
one kmail crash, but IIRC that was after yum had updated something. I
believe this particular tar related item has been attended to. Close it
out.
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
The NRA is offering FREE Associate memberships to anyone who wants them.
<https://www.nrahq.org/nrabonus/accept-membership.asp>
If *I* had a hammer, there'd be no more folk singers.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13899] Oops from tar, 2.6.31-rc5, 32 bit on quad core phenom.
2009-08-20 2:51 ` Gene Heskett
(?)
@ 2009-08-20 14:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-20 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gene Heskett; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Thursday 20 August 2009, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >of recent regressions.
> >
> >The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> >(either way).
> >
> >
> >Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13899
> >Subject : Oops from tar, 2.6.31-rc5, 32 bit on quad core phenom.
> >Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>
> >Date : 2009-08-01 13:04 (19 days old)
> >References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124913190304149&w=4
>
> I have not seen this since I rebooted to 31-rc6 3.5 days ago. So apparently
> something that went into rc6 that was not in rc5, has fixed it. I have had
> one kmail crash, but IIRC that was after yum had updated something. I
> believe this particular tar related item has been attended to. Close it
> out.
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13848] iwlwifi (4965) regression since 2.6.30
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Lukas Hejtmanek
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13848
Subject : iwlwifi (4965) regression since 2.6.30
Submitter : Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz>
Date : 2009-07-26 7:57 (25 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124859658502866&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13914] e1000e reports invalid NVM Checksum on 82566DM-2 (bisected)
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, jsbronder
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13914
Subject : e1000e reports invalid NVM Checksum on 82566DM-2 (bisected)
Submitter : <jsbronder@gentoo.org>
Date : 2009-08-04 18:06 (16 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13914] e1000e reports invalid NVM Checksum on 82566DM-2 (bisected)
@ 2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, jsbronder-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13914
Subject : e1000e reports invalid NVM Checksum on 82566DM-2 (bisected)
Submitter : <jsbronder-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-04 18:06 (16 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13935] 2.6.31-rcX breaks Apple MightyMouse (Bluetooth version)
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Adrian Ulrich, Jan Scholz, Jiri Kosina
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13935
Subject : 2.6.31-rcX breaks Apple MightyMouse (Bluetooth version)
Submitter : Adrian Ulrich <kernel@blinkenlights.ch>
Date : 2009-08-08 22:08 (12 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=fa047e4f6fa63a6e9d0ae4d7749538830d14a343
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread* [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-19 23:54 ` Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940
Subject : iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
Submitter : Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira <storm@sys49152.net>
Date : 2009-08-07 22:33 (13 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968457731107&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
2009-08-19 20:26 ` [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-19 23:54 ` Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira @ 2009-08-19 23:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
Yes, 2.6.31-rc6 still has the bug.
On Wednesday 19 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940
> Subject : iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
> Submitter : Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira <storm@sys49152.net>
> Date : 2009-08-07 22:33 (13 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968457731107&w=4
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
@ 2009-08-19 23:54 ` Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira @ 2009-08-19 23:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
Yes, 2.6.31-rc6 still has the bug.
On Wednesday 19 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940
> Subject : iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
> Submitter : Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira <storm-cOTmPFJTJjbk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-08-07 22:33 (13 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968457731107&w=4
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <200908200054.36939.storm-cOTmPFJTJjbk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
2009-08-19 23:54 ` Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
@ 2009-08-20 14:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-20 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, ACPI Devel Maling List
On Thursday 20 August 2009, Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira wrote:
> Yes, 2.6.31-rc6 still has the bug.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
> On Wednesday 19 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940
> > Subject : iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
> > Submitter : Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira <storm-cOTmPFJTJjbk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-08-07 22:33 (13 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968457731107&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
@ 2009-08-20 14:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-20 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, ACPI Devel Maling List
On Thursday 20 August 2009, Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira wrote:
> Yes, 2.6.31-rc6 still has the bug.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
> On Wednesday 19 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940
> > Subject : iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
> > Submitter : Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira <storm@sys49152.net>
> > Date : 2009-08-07 22:33 (13 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968457731107&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13942] Troubles with AoE and uninitialized object
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bruno Prémont
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13942
Subject : Troubles with AoE and uninitialized object
Submitter : Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Date : 2009-08-04 10:12 (16 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124938117104811&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13942] Troubles with AoE and uninitialized object
@ 2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bruno Prémont
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13942
Subject : Troubles with AoE and uninitialized object
Submitter : Bruno Prémont <bonbons-ud5FBsm0p/xEiooADzr8i9i2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-04 10:12 (16 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124938117104811&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13942] Troubles with AoE and uninitialized object
2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-20 19:29 ` Bruno Prémont
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Bruno Prémont @ 2009-08-20 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Wed, 19 August 2009 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13942
> Subject : Troubles with AoE and uninitialized object
> Submitter : Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
> Date : 2009-08-04 10:12 (16 days old)
> References :
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124938117104811&w=4
>
This one is still valid for 2.6.31-rc6 though I have not yet taken
the time to attempt bisecting it. I will probably bisect over the
week-end.
Bruno
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13942] Troubles with AoE and uninitialized object
@ 2009-08-20 19:29 ` Bruno Prémont
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Bruno Prémont @ 2009-08-20 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Wed, 19 August 2009 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13942
> Subject : Troubles with AoE and uninitialized object
> Submitter : Bruno Prémont <bonbons-ud5FBsm0p/xEiooADzr8i9i2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-08-04 10:12 (16 days old)
> References :
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124938117104811&w=4
>
This one is still valid for 2.6.31-rc6 though I have not yet taken
the time to attempt bisecting it. I will probably bisect over the
week-end.
Bruno
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13942] Troubles with AoE and uninitialized object
@ 2009-08-20 21:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-20 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruno Prémont; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Thursday 20 August 2009, Bruno Prémont wrote:
> On Wed, 19 August 2009 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13942
> > Subject : Troubles with AoE and uninitialized object
> > Submitter : Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
> > Date : 2009-08-04 10:12 (16 days old)
> > References :
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124938117104811&w=4
> >
>
> This one is still valid for 2.6.31-rc6 though I have not yet taken
> the time to attempt bisecting it. I will probably bisect over the
> week-end.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13942] Troubles with AoE and uninitialized object
@ 2009-08-20 21:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-20 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruno Prémont; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Thursday 20 August 2009, Bruno Prémont wrote:
> On Wed, 19 August 2009 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13942
> > Subject : Troubles with AoE and uninitialized object
> > Submitter : Bruno Prémont <bonbons-ud5FBsm0p/xEiooADzr8i9i2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-08-04 10:12 (16 days old)
> > References :
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124938117104811&w=4
> >
>
> This one is still valid for 2.6.31-rc6 though I have not yet taken
> the time to attempt bisecting it. I will probably bisect over the
> week-end.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Al Viro, Martin-Éric Racine
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
Subject : x86 Geode issue
Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>
Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (17 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Al Viro, Martin-Éric Racine
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
Subject : x86 Geode issue
Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (17 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
@ 2009-08-20 7:33 ` Martin-Éric Racine
2009-08-20 15:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 126+ messages in thread
From: Martin-Éric Racine @ 2009-08-20 7:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Al Viro
Yes, it's still valid.
Screenshots of the crash have been provided. Is anything else missing
for the LKML to be able to debug and fix this?
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
> Subject : x86 Geode issue
> Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>
> Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (17 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-20 15:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-20 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: q-funk; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Al Viro
On Thursday 20 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> Yes, it's still valid.
Thanks for the update.
> Screenshots of the crash have been provided. Is anything else missing
> for the LKML to be able to debug and fix this?
An idea of what can be wrong?
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
> > Subject : x86 Geode issue
> > Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>
> > Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (17 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-20 15:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-20 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Al Viro
On Thursday 20 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> Yes, it's still valid.
Thanks for the update.
> Screenshots of the crash have been provided. Is anything else missing
> for the LKML to be able to debug and fix this?
An idea of what can be wrong?
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
> > Subject : x86 Geode issue
> > Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (17 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-20 18:36 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2009-08-20 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: q-funk, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Al Viro
[Rafael J. Wysocki - Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 05:04:06PM +0200]
| On Thursday 20 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
| > Yes, it's still valid.
|
| Thanks for the update.
|
| > Screenshots of the crash have been provided. Is anything else missing
| > for the LKML to be able to debug and fix this?
|
| An idea of what can be wrong?
|
| > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
| > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
| > > of recent regressions.
| > >
| > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
| > > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
| > > (either way).
| > >
| > >
| > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
| > > Subject : x86 Geode issue
| > > Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>
| > > Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (17 days old)
| > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4
|
| Rafael
|
Hi,
may I post a thought?
It seems strange to me that alloc_inode may set
#ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
inode->i_acl = inode->i_default_acl = ACL_NOT_CACHED;
#endif
[where ACL_NOT_CACHED is #define ACL_NOT_CACHED ((void *)(-1))]
meanwhile say jffs2_init_acl_post use ACL_NOT_CACHED
as a valid value and trying to parse it.
But perhaps, I miss something.
-- Cyrill
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-20 18:36 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2009-08-20 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Al Viro
[Rafael J. Wysocki - Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 05:04:06PM +0200]
| On Thursday 20 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
| > Yes, it's still valid.
|
| Thanks for the update.
|
| > Screenshots of the crash have been provided. Is anything else missing
| > for the LKML to be able to debug and fix this?
|
| An idea of what can be wrong?
|
| > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
| > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
| > > of recent regressions.
| > >
| > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
| > > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
| > > (either way).
| > >
| > >
| > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
| > > Subject : x86 Geode issue
| > > Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org>
| > > Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (17 days old)
| > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4
|
| Rafael
|
Hi,
may I post a thought?
It seems strange to me that alloc_inode may set
#ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
inode->i_acl = inode->i_default_acl = ACL_NOT_CACHED;
#endif
[where ACL_NOT_CACHED is #define ACL_NOT_CACHED ((void *)(-1))]
meanwhile say jffs2_init_acl_post use ACL_NOT_CACHED
as a valid value and trying to parse it.
But perhaps, I miss something.
-- Cyrill
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
2009-08-20 18:36 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
@ 2009-08-20 19:08 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2009-08-20 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, q-funk, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Al Viro
[Cyrill Gorcunov - Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:36:35PM +0400]
...
| | > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
| | > > Subject : x86 Geode issue
| | > > Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>
| | > > Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (17 days old)
| | > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4
| |
| | Rafael
| |
|
| Hi,
|
| may I post a thought?
|
| It seems strange to me that alloc_inode may set
|
| #ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
| inode->i_acl = inode->i_default_acl = ACL_NOT_CACHED;
| #endif
|
| [where ACL_NOT_CACHED is #define ACL_NOT_CACHED ((void *)(-1))]
|
| meanwhile say jffs2_init_acl_post use ACL_NOT_CACHED
| as a valid value and trying to parse it.
|
| But perhaps, I miss something.
|
| -- Cyrill
Sorry, this is unrelated and wrong. Drop this message.
-- Cyrill
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-20 19:08 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2009-08-20 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Al Viro
[Cyrill Gorcunov - Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:36:35PM +0400]
...
| | > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
| | > > Subject : x86 Geode issue
| | > > Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org>
| | > > Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (17 days old)
| | > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4
| |
| | Rafael
| |
|
| Hi,
|
| may I post a thought?
|
| It seems strange to me that alloc_inode may set
|
| #ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
| inode->i_acl = inode->i_default_acl = ACL_NOT_CACHED;
| #endif
|
| [where ACL_NOT_CACHED is #define ACL_NOT_CACHED ((void *)(-1))]
|
| meanwhile say jffs2_init_acl_post use ACL_NOT_CACHED
| as a valid value and trying to parse it.
|
| But perhaps, I miss something.
|
| -- Cyrill
Sorry, this is unrelated and wrong. Drop this message.
-- Cyrill
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13943] WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-20 6:54 ` Fabio Comolli
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Fabio Comolli, Luis R. Rodriguez
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-06 20:15 (14 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124958978600600&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #13943] WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
2009-08-19 20:26 ` [Bug #13943] WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-20 6:54 ` Fabio Comolli
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Comolli @ 2009-08-20 6:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Luis R. Rodriguez
This bug is still present (also in wireless-testing).
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
> Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
> Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-08-06 20:15 (14 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124958978600600&w=4
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13943] WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
@ 2009-08-20 6:54 ` Fabio Comolli
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Comolli @ 2009-08-20 6:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Luis R. Rodriguez
This bug is still present (also in wireless-testing).
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
> Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
> Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-08-06 20:15 (14 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124958978600600&w=4
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13943] WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
@ 2009-08-20 15:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-20 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fabio Comolli
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Luis R. Rodriguez
On Thursday 20 August 2009, Fabio Comolli wrote:
> This bug is still present (also in wireless-testing).
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
> > Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
> > Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2009-08-06 20:15 (14 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124958978600600&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13943] WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
@ 2009-08-20 15:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-20 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fabio Comolli
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Luis R. Rodriguez
On Thursday 20 August 2009, Fabio Comolli wrote:
> This bug is still present (also in wireless-testing).
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
> > Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
> > Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-08-06 20:15 (14 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124958978600600&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13946] x86 MCE malfunction on Thinkpad T42p
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-20 20:22 ` Johannes Stezenbach
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Johannes Stezenbach
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13946
Subject : x86 MCE malfunction on Thinkpad T42p
Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
Date : 2009-08-07 17:09 (13 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124966500232399&w=4
Handled-By : Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/37908/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread* [Bug #13947] Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-20 8:51 ` roel kluin
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Daniel Mack, John W. Linville, Roel Kluin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13947
Subject : Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
Submitter : Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
Date : 2009-08-07 19:11 (13 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=57921c312e8cef72ba35a4cfe870b376da0b1b87
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124967234311481&w=4
Handled-By : Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #13947] Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
2009-08-19 20:26 ` [Bug #13947] Libertas: Association request to the driver failed Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-20 8:51 ` roel kluin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: roel kluin @ 2009-08-20 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Daniel Mack,
John W. Linville
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13947
> Subject : Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
> Submitter : Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
> Date : 2009-08-07 19:11 (13 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=57921c312e8cef72ba35a4cfe870b376da0b1b87
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124967234311481&w=4
> Handled-By : Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
I think this should be fixed with patch of Dan Williams found here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/12/299
Roel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13947] Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
@ 2009-08-20 8:51 ` roel kluin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: roel kluin @ 2009-08-20 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Daniel Mack,
John W. Linville
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13947
> Subject : Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
> Submitter : Daniel Mack <daniel-rDUAYElUppE@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-08-07 19:11 (13 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=57921c312e8cef72ba35a4cfe870b376da0b1b87
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124967234311481&w=4
> Handled-By : Roel Kluin <roel.kluin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
I think this should be fixed with patch of Dan Williams found here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/12/299
Roel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13947] Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
@ 2009-08-20 15:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-20 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: roel kluin
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Daniel Mack,
John W. Linville, Dan Williams
On Thursday 20 August 2009, roel kluin wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13947
> > Subject : Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
> > Submitter : Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
> > Date : 2009-08-07 19:11 (13 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=57921c312e8cef72ba35a4cfe870b376da0b1b87
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124967234311481&w=4
> > Handled-By : Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
>
> I think this should be fixed with patch of Dan Williams found here:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/12/299
Thanks, bug entry updated.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13947] Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
@ 2009-08-20 15:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-20 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: roel kluin
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Daniel Mack,
John W. Linville, Dan Williams
On Thursday 20 August 2009, roel kluin wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13947
> > Subject : Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
> > Submitter : Daniel Mack <daniel-rDUAYElUppE@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-08-07 19:11 (13 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=57921c312e8cef72ba35a4cfe870b376da0b1b87
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124967234311481&w=4
> > Handled-By : Roel Kluin <roel.kluin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>
> I think this should be fixed with patch of Dan Williams found here:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/12/299
Thanks, bug entry updated.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13947] Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
@ 2009-08-20 15:17 ` Gene Heskett
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Gene Heskett @ 2009-08-20 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: roel kluin, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Daniel Mack, John W. Linville, Dan Williams
On Thursday 20 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>On Thursday 20 August 2009, roel kluin wrote:
>> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13947
>> > Subject : Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
>> > Submitter : Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
>> > Date : 2009-08-07 19:11 (13 days old)
>> > First-Bad-Commit:
>> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=comm
>> >it;h=57921c312e8cef72ba35a4cfe870b376da0b1b87 References :
>> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124967234311481&w=4 Handled-By
>> > : Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
>>
>> I think this should be fixed with patch of Dan Williams found here:
>>
>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/12/299
>
>Thanks, bug entry updated.
>
Has this made it into 2.6.31-rc6? I have one of these pci cards, and it is
still a no-show even after modprobing the mwl* and libertas modules.
>Rafael
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
The NRA is offering FREE Associate memberships to anyone who wants them.
<https://www.nrahq.org/nrabonus/accept-membership.asp>
There is no act of treachery or mean-ness of which a political party
is not capable; for in politics there is no honour.
-- Benjamin Disraeli, "Vivian Grey"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13947] Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
@ 2009-08-20 15:17 ` Gene Heskett
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Gene Heskett @ 2009-08-20 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: roel kluin, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Daniel Mack, John W. Linville, Dan Williams
On Thursday 20 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>On Thursday 20 August 2009, roel kluin wrote:
>> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13947
>> > Subject : Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
>> > Submitter : Daniel Mack <daniel-rDUAYElUppE@public.gmane.org>
>> > Date : 2009-08-07 19:11 (13 days old)
>> > First-Bad-Commit:
>> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=comm
>> >it;h=57921c312e8cef72ba35a4cfe870b376da0b1b87 References :
>> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124967234311481&w=4 Handled-By
>> > : Roel Kluin <roel.kluin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>>
>> I think this should be fixed with patch of Dan Williams found here:
>>
>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/12/299
>
>Thanks, bug entry updated.
>
Has this made it into 2.6.31-rc6? I have one of these pci cards, and it is
still a no-show even after modprobing the mwl* and libertas modules.
>Rafael
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
The NRA is offering FREE Associate memberships to anyone who wants them.
<https://www.nrahq.org/nrabonus/accept-membership.asp>
There is no act of treachery or mean-ness of which a political party
is not capable; for in politics there is no honour.
-- Benjamin Disraeli, "Vivian Grey"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13947] Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
@ 2009-08-21 15:33 ` Dan Williams
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2009-08-21 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gene Heskett
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, roel kluin, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Daniel Mack, John W. Linville
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 11:17 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 20 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >On Thursday 20 August 2009, roel kluin wrote:
> >> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13947
> >> > Subject : Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
> >> > Submitter : Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
> >> > Date : 2009-08-07 19:11 (13 days old)
> >> > First-Bad-Commit:
> >> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=comm
> >> >it;h=57921c312e8cef72ba35a4cfe870b376da0b1b87 References :
> >> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124967234311481&w=4 Handled-By
> >> > : Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> I think this should be fixed with patch of Dan Williams found here:
> >>
> >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/12/299
> >
> >Thanks, bug entry updated.
> >
> Has this made it into 2.6.31-rc6? I have one of these pci cards, and it is
> still a no-show even after modprobing the mwl* and libertas modules.
You're still looking for the softmac stuff, which the 'libertas' driver
doesn't support. You want to keep track of mwl8k where any new support
for softmac Marvell cards would end up.
Dan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13947] Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
@ 2009-08-21 15:33 ` Dan Williams
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2009-08-21 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gene Heskett
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, roel kluin, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Daniel Mack, John W. Linville
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 11:17 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 20 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >On Thursday 20 August 2009, roel kluin wrote:
> >> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13947
> >> > Subject : Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
> >> > Submitter : Daniel Mack <daniel-rDUAYElUppE@public.gmane.org>
> >> > Date : 2009-08-07 19:11 (13 days old)
> >> > First-Bad-Commit:
> >> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=comm
> >> >it;h=57921c312e8cef72ba35a4cfe870b376da0b1b87 References :
> >> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124967234311481&w=4 Handled-By
> >> > : Roel Kluin <roel.kluin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> >>
> >> I think this should be fixed with patch of Dan Williams found here:
> >>
> >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/12/299
> >
> >Thanks, bug entry updated.
> >
> Has this made it into 2.6.31-rc6? I have one of these pci cards, and it is
> still a no-show even after modprobing the mwl* and libertas modules.
You're still looking for the softmac stuff, which the 'libertas' driver
doesn't support. You want to keep track of mwl8k where any new support
for softmac Marvell cards would end up.
Dan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13947] Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
2009-08-21 15:33 ` Dan Williams
(?)
@ 2009-08-21 16:09 ` Gene Heskett
2009-08-25 20:12 ` Dan Williams
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 126+ messages in thread
From: Gene Heskett @ 2009-08-21 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Williams
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, roel kluin, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Daniel Mack, John W. Linville
On Friday 21 August 2009, Dan Williams wrote:
>On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 11:17 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Thursday 20 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> >On Thursday 20 August 2009, roel kluin wrote:
>> >> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13947
>> >> > Subject : Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
>> >> > Submitter : Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
>> >> > Date : 2009-08-07 19:11 (13 days old)
>> >> > First-Bad-Commit:
>> >> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=c
>> >> >omm it;h=57921c312e8cef72ba35a4cfe870b376da0b1b87 References :
>> >> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124967234311481&w=4 Handled-By
>> >> >
>> >> > : Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >> I think this should be fixed with patch of Dan Williams found here:
>> >>
>> >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/12/299
>> >
>> >Thanks, bug entry updated.
>>
>> Has this made it into 2.6.31-rc6? I have one of these pci cards, and it
>> is still a no-show even after modprobing the mwl* and libertas modules.
>
>You're still looking for the softmac stuff, which the 'libertas' driver
>doesn't support. You want to keep track of mwl8k where any new support
>for softmac Marvell cards would end up.
>
>Dan
I am also loading that mwl8k module, Dan, and that isn't doing any notable
good either. These are NetGears latest pci 802-11bg cards. And the only pci
or pci-e cards widely available (Staples stocks them) unless wallmart might
have some (spitui) Belkin cards. I have not noted them at my local wally's.
modprobing mwl8k, then libertas, gets this in an lsmod:
Module Size Used by
libertas 166456 0
lib80211 5664 1 libertas
mwl8k 27740 0
mac80211 149932 1 mwl8k
cfg80211 88988 2 mwl8k,mac80211
removing them and reversing the order of loading:
Module Size Used by
mwl8k 27740 0
libertas 166456 0
lib80211 5664 1 libertas
mac80211 149932 1 mwl8k
cfg80211 88988 2 mwl8k,mac80211
really doesn't change anything. And of those two loads, only one shows in
the messages file as:
Aug 21 11:55:35 coyote kernel: [436464.036670] cfg80211: Using static regulatory domain info
Aug 21 11:55:35 coyote kernel: [436464.036673] cfg80211: Regulatory domain: US
Aug 21 11:55:35 coyote kernel: [436464.036675] (start_freq - end_freq @ bandwidth), (max_antenna_gain, max_eirp)
Aug 21 11:55:35 coyote kernel: [436464.036678] (2402000 KHz - 2472000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (600 mBi, 2700 mBm)
Aug 21 11:55:35 coyote kernel: [436464.036681] (5170000 KHz - 5190000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (600 mBi, 2300 mBm)
Aug 21 11:55:35 coyote kernel: [436464.036684] (5190000 KHz - 5210000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (600 mBi, 2300 mBm)
Aug 21 11:55:35 coyote kernel: [436464.036686] (5210000 KHz - 5230000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (600 mBi, 2300 mBm)
Aug 21 11:55:35 coyote kernel: [436464.036689] (5230000 KHz - 5330000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (600 mBi, 2300 mBm)
Aug 21 11:55:35 coyote kernel: [436464.036692] (5735000 KHz - 5835000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (600 mBi, 3000 mBm)
Aug 21 11:55:35 coyote kernel: [436464.036697] cfg80211: Calling CRDA for country: US
Aug 21 11:55:59 coyote kernel: [436488.563723] lib80211: common routines for IEEE802.11 drivers
And no usable interface is created.
[root@coyote etc]# iwconfig
lo no wireless extensions.
eth0 no wireless extensions.
eth1 no wireless extensions.
eth1 is the 2nd MCP55 (nvidia) port on this motherboard, unrelated to anything wireless.
Fedora 10 system, ASUS M2N SLI Deluxe mobo, slow 2.2ghz phenom 9550 cpu.
Running 2.6.31-rc6.
Am I doing anything wrong?
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
The NRA is offering FREE Associate memberships to anyone who wants them.
<https://www.nrahq.org/nrabonus/accept-membership.asp>
Uncompensated overtime? Just Say No.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13947] Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
@ 2009-08-25 20:12 ` Dan Williams
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2009-08-25 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gene Heskett
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, roel kluin, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Daniel Mack, John W. Linville
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 12:09 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 21 August 2009, Dan Williams wrote:
> >On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 11:17 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> On Thursday 20 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> >On Thursday 20 August 2009, roel kluin wrote:
> >> >> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13947
> >> >> > Subject : Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
> >> >> > Submitter : Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
> >> >> > Date : 2009-08-07 19:11 (13 days old)
> >> >> > First-Bad-Commit:
> >> >> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=c
> >> >> >omm it;h=57921c312e8cef72ba35a4cfe870b376da0b1b87 References :
> >> >> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124967234311481&w=4 Handled-By
> >> >> >
> >> >> > : Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
> >> >>
> >> >> I think this should be fixed with patch of Dan Williams found here:
> >> >>
> >> >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/12/299
> >> >
> >> >Thanks, bug entry updated.
> >>
> >> Has this made it into 2.6.31-rc6? I have one of these pci cards, and it
> >> is still a no-show even after modprobing the mwl* and libertas modules.
> >
> >You're still looking for the softmac stuff, which the 'libertas' driver
> >doesn't support. You want to keep track of mwl8k where any new support
> >for softmac Marvell cards would end up.
> >
> >Dan
>
> I am also loading that mwl8k module, Dan, and that isn't doing any notable
> good either. These are NetGears latest pci 802-11bg cards. And the only pci
> or pci-e cards widely available (Staples stocks them) unless wallmart might
> have some (spitui) Belkin cards. I have not noted them at my local wally's.
Right, because mwl8k supports only the softmac 8687 PCI-E parts right
now. It doesn't yet support the 8335 or 8310 or 86xx TopDog parts yet.
There hasn't been any movement on those for a while and I haven't gotten
around to abstracting mwl8k's hardware support to handle the older
parts. But mwl8k is the only driver that could possibly be relevant for
you, since libertas will always be for the fullmac-only parts (8385,
8388, 8686, 8688).
Dan
> modprobing mwl8k, then libertas, gets this in an lsmod:
> Module Size Used by
> libertas 166456 0
> lib80211 5664 1 libertas
> mwl8k 27740 0
> mac80211 149932 1 mwl8k
> cfg80211 88988 2 mwl8k,mac80211
>
> removing them and reversing the order of loading:
> Module Size Used by
> mwl8k 27740 0
> libertas 166456 0
> lib80211 5664 1 libertas
> mac80211 149932 1 mwl8k
> cfg80211 88988 2 mwl8k,mac80211
>
> really doesn't change anything. And of those two loads, only one shows in
> the messages file as:
>
> Aug 21 11:55:35 coyote kernel: [436464.036670] cfg80211: Using static regulatory domain info
> Aug 21 11:55:35 coyote kernel: [436464.036673] cfg80211: Regulatory domain: US
> Aug 21 11:55:35 coyote kernel: [436464.036675] (start_freq - end_freq @ bandwidth), (max_antenna_gain, max_eirp)
> Aug 21 11:55:35 coyote kernel: [436464.036678] (2402000 KHz - 2472000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (600 mBi, 2700 mBm)
> Aug 21 11:55:35 coyote kernel: [436464.036681] (5170000 KHz - 5190000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (600 mBi, 2300 mBm)
> Aug 21 11:55:35 coyote kernel: [436464.036684] (5190000 KHz - 5210000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (600 mBi, 2300 mBm)
> Aug 21 11:55:35 coyote kernel: [436464.036686] (5210000 KHz - 5230000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (600 mBi, 2300 mBm)
> Aug 21 11:55:35 coyote kernel: [436464.036689] (5230000 KHz - 5330000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (600 mBi, 2300 mBm)
> Aug 21 11:55:35 coyote kernel: [436464.036692] (5735000 KHz - 5835000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (600 mBi, 3000 mBm)
> Aug 21 11:55:35 coyote kernel: [436464.036697] cfg80211: Calling CRDA for country: US
> Aug 21 11:55:59 coyote kernel: [436488.563723] lib80211: common routines for IEEE802.11 drivers
>
> And no usable interface is created.
> [root@coyote etc]# iwconfig
> lo no wireless extensions.
> eth0 no wireless extensions.
> eth1 no wireless extensions.
>
> eth1 is the 2nd MCP55 (nvidia) port on this motherboard, unrelated to anything wireless.
>
> Fedora 10 system, ASUS M2N SLI Deluxe mobo, slow 2.2ghz phenom 9550 cpu.
> Running 2.6.31-rc6.
>
> Am I doing anything wrong?
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13947] Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
@ 2009-08-25 20:12 ` Dan Williams
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2009-08-25 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gene Heskett
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, roel kluin, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Daniel Mack, John W. Linville
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 12:09 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 21 August 2009, Dan Williams wrote:
> >On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 11:17 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> On Thursday 20 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> >On Thursday 20 August 2009, roel kluin wrote:
> >> >> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13947
> >> >> > Subject : Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
> >> >> > Submitter : Daniel Mack <daniel-rDUAYElUppE@public.gmane.org>
> >> >> > Date : 2009-08-07 19:11 (13 days old)
> >> >> > First-Bad-Commit:
> >> >> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=c
> >> >> >omm it;h=57921c312e8cef72ba35a4cfe870b376da0b1b87 References :
> >> >> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124967234311481&w=4 Handled-By
> >> >> >
> >> >> > : Roel Kluin <roel.kluin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> >> >>
> >> >> I think this should be fixed with patch of Dan Williams found here:
> >> >>
> >> >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/12/299
> >> >
> >> >Thanks, bug entry updated.
> >>
> >> Has this made it into 2.6.31-rc6? I have one of these pci cards, and it
> >> is still a no-show even after modprobing the mwl* and libertas modules.
> >
> >You're still looking for the softmac stuff, which the 'libertas' driver
> >doesn't support. You want to keep track of mwl8k where any new support
> >for softmac Marvell cards would end up.
> >
> >Dan
>
> I am also loading that mwl8k module, Dan, and that isn't doing any notable
> good either. These are NetGears latest pci 802-11bg cards. And the only pci
> or pci-e cards widely available (Staples stocks them) unless wallmart might
> have some (spitui) Belkin cards. I have not noted them at my local wally's.
Right, because mwl8k supports only the softmac 8687 PCI-E parts right
now. It doesn't yet support the 8335 or 8310 or 86xx TopDog parts yet.
There hasn't been any movement on those for a while and I haven't gotten
around to abstracting mwl8k's hardware support to handle the older
parts. But mwl8k is the only driver that could possibly be relevant for
you, since libertas will always be for the fullmac-only parts (8385,
8388, 8686, 8688).
Dan
> modprobing mwl8k, then libertas, gets this in an lsmod:
> Module Size Used by
> libertas 166456 0
> lib80211 5664 1 libertas
> mwl8k 27740 0
> mac80211 149932 1 mwl8k
> cfg80211 88988 2 mwl8k,mac80211
>
> removing them and reversing the order of loading:
> Module Size Used by
> mwl8k 27740 0
> libertas 166456 0
> lib80211 5664 1 libertas
> mac80211 149932 1 mwl8k
> cfg80211 88988 2 mwl8k,mac80211
>
> really doesn't change anything. And of those two loads, only one shows in
> the messages file as:
>
> Aug 21 11:55:35 coyote kernel: [436464.036670] cfg80211: Using static regulatory domain info
> Aug 21 11:55:35 coyote kernel: [436464.036673] cfg80211: Regulatory domain: US
> Aug 21 11:55:35 coyote kernel: [436464.036675] (start_freq - end_freq @ bandwidth), (max_antenna_gain, max_eirp)
> Aug 21 11:55:35 coyote kernel: [436464.036678] (2402000 KHz - 2472000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (600 mBi, 2700 mBm)
> Aug 21 11:55:35 coyote kernel: [436464.036681] (5170000 KHz - 5190000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (600 mBi, 2300 mBm)
> Aug 21 11:55:35 coyote kernel: [436464.036684] (5190000 KHz - 5210000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (600 mBi, 2300 mBm)
> Aug 21 11:55:35 coyote kernel: [436464.036686] (5210000 KHz - 5230000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (600 mBi, 2300 mBm)
> Aug 21 11:55:35 coyote kernel: [436464.036689] (5230000 KHz - 5330000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (600 mBi, 2300 mBm)
> Aug 21 11:55:35 coyote kernel: [436464.036692] (5735000 KHz - 5835000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (600 mBi, 3000 mBm)
> Aug 21 11:55:35 coyote kernel: [436464.036697] cfg80211: Calling CRDA for country: US
> Aug 21 11:55:59 coyote kernel: [436488.563723] lib80211: common routines for IEEE802.11 drivers
>
> And no usable interface is created.
> [root@coyote etc]# iwconfig
> lo no wireless extensions.
> eth0 no wireless extensions.
> eth1 no wireless extensions.
>
> eth1 is the 2nd MCP55 (nvidia) port on this motherboard, unrelated to anything wireless.
>
> Fedora 10 system, ASUS M2N SLI Deluxe mobo, slow 2.2ghz phenom 9550 cpu.
> Running 2.6.31-rc6.
>
> Am I doing anything wrong?
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13947] Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
@ 2009-08-25 21:31 ` Gene Heskett
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Gene Heskett @ 2009-08-25 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Williams
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, roel kluin, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Daniel Mack, John W. Linville
On Tuesday 25 August 2009, Dan Williams wrote:
>On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 12:09 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Friday 21 August 2009, Dan Williams wrote:
>> >On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 11:17 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> >> On Thursday 20 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> >> >On Thursday 20 August 2009, roel kluin wrote:
>> >> >> > Bug-Entry :
>> >> >> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13947 Subject
>> >> >> > : Libertas: Association request to the driver failed Submitter
>> >> >> > : Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
>> >> >> > Date : 2009-08-07 19:11 (13 days old)
>> >> >> > First-Bad-Commit:
>> >> >> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;
>> >> >> >a=c omm it;h=57921c312e8cef72ba35a4cfe870b376da0b1b87 References
>> >> >> > : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124967234311481&w=4
>> >> >> > Handled-By
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > : Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I think this should be fixed with patch of Dan Williams found here:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/12/299
>> >> >
>> >> >Thanks, bug entry updated.
>> >>
>> >> Has this made it into 2.6.31-rc6? I have one of these pci cards, and
>> >> it is still a no-show even after modprobing the mwl* and libertas
>> >> modules.
>> >
>> >You're still looking for the softmac stuff, which the 'libertas' driver
>> >doesn't support. You want to keep track of mwl8k where any new support
>> >for softmac Marvell cards would end up.
>> >
>> >Dan
>>
>> I am also loading that mwl8k module, Dan, and that isn't doing any
>> notable good either. These are NetGears latest pci 802-11bg cards. And
>> the only pci or pci-e cards widely available (Staples stocks them) unless
>> wallmart might have some (spitui) Belkin cards. I have not noted them at
>> my local wally's.
>
>Right, because mwl8k supports only the softmac 8687 PCI-E parts right
>now. It doesn't yet support the 8335 or 8310 or 86xx TopDog parts yet.
>There hasn't been any movement on those for a while and I haven't gotten
>around to abstracting mwl8k's hardware support to handle the older
>parts. But mwl8k is the only driver that could possibly be relevant for
>you, since libertas will always be for the fullmac-only parts (8385,
>8388, 8686, 8688).
>
>Dan
Thanks Dan, now I have a clearer picture, and I should be watching for
patches to mwl8k to go by & testing them, that I can do if you want to put me
on your patch list for that, if & when there are patches to test. ;-)
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
The NRA is offering FREE Associate memberships to anyone who wants them.
<https://www.nrahq.org/nrabonus/accept-membership.asp>
Bowie's Theorem:
If an experiment works, you must be using the wrong equipment.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13947] Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
@ 2009-08-25 21:31 ` Gene Heskett
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Gene Heskett @ 2009-08-25 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Williams
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, roel kluin, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Daniel Mack, John W. Linville
On Tuesday 25 August 2009, Dan Williams wrote:
>On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 12:09 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Friday 21 August 2009, Dan Williams wrote:
>> >On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 11:17 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> >> On Thursday 20 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> >> >On Thursday 20 August 2009, roel kluin wrote:
>> >> >> > Bug-Entry :
>> >> >> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13947 Subject
>> >> >> > : Libertas: Association request to the driver failed Submitter
>> >> >> > : Daniel Mack <daniel-rDUAYElUppE@public.gmane.org>
>> >> >> > Date : 2009-08-07 19:11 (13 days old)
>> >> >> > First-Bad-Commit:
>> >> >> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;
>> >> >> >a=c omm it;h=57921c312e8cef72ba35a4cfe870b376da0b1b87 References
>> >> >> > : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124967234311481&w=4
>> >> >> > Handled-By
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > : Roel Kluin <roel.kluin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I think this should be fixed with patch of Dan Williams found here:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/12/299
>> >> >
>> >> >Thanks, bug entry updated.
>> >>
>> >> Has this made it into 2.6.31-rc6? I have one of these pci cards, and
>> >> it is still a no-show even after modprobing the mwl* and libertas
>> >> modules.
>> >
>> >You're still looking for the softmac stuff, which the 'libertas' driver
>> >doesn't support. You want to keep track of mwl8k where any new support
>> >for softmac Marvell cards would end up.
>> >
>> >Dan
>>
>> I am also loading that mwl8k module, Dan, and that isn't doing any
>> notable good either. These are NetGears latest pci 802-11bg cards. And
>> the only pci or pci-e cards widely available (Staples stocks them) unless
>> wallmart might have some (spitui) Belkin cards. I have not noted them at
>> my local wally's.
>
>Right, because mwl8k supports only the softmac 8687 PCI-E parts right
>now. It doesn't yet support the 8335 or 8310 or 86xx TopDog parts yet.
>There hasn't been any movement on those for a while and I haven't gotten
>around to abstracting mwl8k's hardware support to handle the older
>parts. But mwl8k is the only driver that could possibly be relevant for
>you, since libertas will always be for the fullmac-only parts (8385,
>8388, 8686, 8688).
>
>Dan
Thanks Dan, now I have a clearer picture, and I should be watching for
patches to mwl8k to go by & testing them, that I can do if you want to put me
on your patch list for that, if & when there are patches to test. ;-)
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
The NRA is offering FREE Associate memberships to anyone who wants them.
<https://www.nrahq.org/nrabonus/accept-membership.asp>
Bowie's Theorem:
If an experiment works, you must be using the wrong equipment.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13947] Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
@ 2009-08-21 15:35 ` Dan Williams
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2009-08-21 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: roel kluin, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Daniel Mack, John W. Linville
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 17:10 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday 20 August 2009, roel kluin wrote:
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13947
> > > Subject : Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
> > > Submitter : Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
> > > Date : 2009-08-07 19:11 (13 days old)
> > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=57921c312e8cef72ba35a4cfe870b376da0b1b87
> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124967234311481&w=4
> > > Handled-By : Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
> >
> > I think this should be fixed with patch of Dan Williams found here:
> >
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/12/299
>
> Thanks, bug entry updated.
Rebased tested and posted to linux-wireless officially:
Subject: [PATCH] libertas: clean up and clarify get_common_rates
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:35:20 -0500
Dan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13947] Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
@ 2009-08-21 15:35 ` Dan Williams
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2009-08-21 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: roel kluin, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Daniel Mack, John W. Linville
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 17:10 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday 20 August 2009, roel kluin wrote:
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13947
> > > Subject : Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
> > > Submitter : Daniel Mack <daniel-rDUAYElUppE@public.gmane.org>
> > > Date : 2009-08-07 19:11 (13 days old)
> > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=57921c312e8cef72ba35a4cfe870b376da0b1b87
> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124967234311481&w=4
> > > Handled-By : Roel Kluin <roel.kluin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> >
> > I think this should be fixed with patch of Dan Williams found here:
> >
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/12/299
>
> Thanks, bug entry updated.
Rebased tested and posted to linux-wireless officially:
Subject: [PATCH] libertas: clean up and clarify get_common_rates
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:35:20 -0500
Dan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13947] Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
2009-08-21 15:35 ` Dan Williams
(?)
@ 2009-08-21 16:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-21 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Williams
Cc: roel kluin, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Daniel Mack, John W. Linville
On Friday 21 August 2009, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 17:10 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday 20 August 2009, roel kluin wrote:
> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13947
> > > > Subject : Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
> > > > Submitter : Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
> > > > Date : 2009-08-07 19:11 (13 days old)
> > > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=57921c312e8cef72ba35a4cfe870b376da0b1b87
> > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124967234311481&w=4
> > > > Handled-By : Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > I think this should be fixed with patch of Dan Williams found here:
> > >
> > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/12/299
> >
> > Thanks, bug entry updated.
>
> Rebased tested and posted to linux-wireless officially:
>
> Subject: [PATCH] libertas: clean up and clarify get_common_rates
> Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:35:20 -0500
Thanks, updated.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13960] rtl8187 not connect to wifi
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, okias
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13960
Subject : rtl8187 not connect to wifi
Submitter : okias <d.okias@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-10 19:16 (10 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13948] ath5k broken after suspend-to-ram
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bob Copeland, Johannes Stezenbach, Nick Kossifidis
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13948
Subject : ath5k broken after suspend-to-ram
Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
Date : 2009-08-07 21:51 (13 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968192727854&w=4
Handled-By : Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@gmail.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/38550/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13948] ath5k broken after suspend-to-ram
@ 2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bob Copeland, Johannes Stezenbach, Nick Kossifidis
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13948
Subject : ath5k broken after suspend-to-ram
Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js-FF7aIK3TAVNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-07 21:51 (13 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968192727854&w=4
Handled-By : Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/38550/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13948] ath5k broken after suspend-to-ram
2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-20 20:32 ` Johannes Stezenbach
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Stezenbach @ 2009-08-20 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Bob Copeland,
Nick Kossifidis, Luis R. Rodriguez, Jiri Slaby
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:26:59PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13948
> Subject : ath5k broken after suspend-to-ram
> Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
> Date : 2009-08-07 21:51 (13 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968192727854&w=4
> Handled-By : Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@gmail.com>
> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/38550/
I cannot test this at the moment, but there have been no
changes to ath5k since I reported the bug, and the
patch still applies. Please keep this listed.
Thanks
Johannes
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13948] ath5k broken after suspend-to-ram
@ 2009-08-20 20:32 ` Johannes Stezenbach
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Stezenbach @ 2009-08-20 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Bob Copeland,
Nick Kossifidis, Luis R. Rodriguez, Jiri Slaby
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:26:59PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13948
> Subject : ath5k broken after suspend-to-ram
> Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js-FF7aIK3TAVNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-08-07 21:51 (13 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968192727854&w=4
> Handled-By : Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/38550/
I cannot test this at the moment, but there have been no
changes to ath5k since I reported the bug, and the
patch still applies. Please keep this listed.
Thanks
Johannes
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13948] ath5k broken after suspend-to-ram
@ 2009-08-20 21:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-20 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Stezenbach
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Bob Copeland,
Nick Kossifidis, Luis R. Rodriguez, Jiri Slaby
On Thursday 20 August 2009, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:26:59PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13948
> > Subject : ath5k broken after suspend-to-ram
> > Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
> > Date : 2009-08-07 21:51 (13 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968192727854&w=4
> > Handled-By : Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@gmail.com>
> > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/38550/
>
> I cannot test this at the moment, but there have been no
> changes to ath5k since I reported the bug, and the
> patch still applies. Please keep this listed.
OK, thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13948] ath5k broken after suspend-to-ram
@ 2009-08-20 21:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-20 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Stezenbach
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Bob Copeland,
Nick Kossifidis, Luis R. Rodriguez, Jiri Slaby
On Thursday 20 August 2009, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:26:59PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13948
> > Subject : ath5k broken after suspend-to-ram
> > Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js-FF7aIK3TAVNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-08-07 21:51 (13 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968192727854&w=4
> > Handled-By : Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/38550/
>
> I cannot test this at the moment, but there have been no
> changes to ath5k since I reported the bug, and the
> patch still applies. Please keep this listed.
OK, thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13950] Oops when USB Serial disconnected while in use
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern, Bruno Prémont
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13950
Subject : Oops when USB Serial disconnected while in use
Submitter : Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Date : 2009-08-08 17:47 (12 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124975432900466&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14003] Infinite loop on bootup while handling DMAR
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-19 20:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14003
Subject : Infinite loop on bootup while handling DMAR
Submitter : Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <bero@arklinux.org>
Date : 2009-08-18 14:54 (2 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14003] Infinite loop on bootup while handling DMAR
@ 2009-08-19 20:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14003
Subject : Infinite loop on bootup while handling DMAR
Submitter : Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <bero-9zdaV+82baBg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-18 14:54 (2 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13987] Received NMI interrupt at resume
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-19 20:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Christian Casteyde
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13987
Subject : Received NMI interrupt at resume
Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
Date : 2009-08-15 07:55 (5 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13987] Received NMI interrupt at resume
@ 2009-08-19 20:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Christian Casteyde
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13987
Subject : Received NMI interrupt at resume
Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-15 07:55 (5 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14002] WARNING: at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:154 inet_sock_destruct+0x164/0x1c0()
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-19 20:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ralf Hildebrandt
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14002
Subject : WARNING: at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:154 inet_sock_destruct+0x164/0x1c0()
Submitter : Ralf Hildebrandt <ralf.hildebrandt@charite.de>
Date : 2009-08-18 12:37 (2 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14002] WARNING: at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:154 inet_sock_destruct+0x164/0x1c0()
@ 2009-08-19 20:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ralf Hildebrandt
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14002
Subject : WARNING: at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:154 inet_sock_destruct+0x164/0x1c0()
Submitter : Ralf Hildebrandt <ralf.hildebrandt-jq1tPX9l7E6ELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-18 12:37 (2 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14011] Kernel paging request failed in kmem_cache_alloc
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (24 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-08-19 20:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Matthias Dahl
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14011
Subject : Kernel paging request failed in kmem_cache_alloc
Submitter : Matthias Dahl <ml_kernel@mortal-soul.de>
Date : 2009-08-10 22:26 (10 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124993603825082&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread* [Bug #14012] latest git fried my x86_64 imac
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (25 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-08-19 20:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Justin P. Mattock
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14012
Subject : latest git fried my x86_64 imac
Submitter : Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-13 07:20 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014080427090&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread* [Bug #14013] hd don't show up
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (26 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-08-19 20:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Tejun Heo, Tim Blechmann
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14013
Subject : hd don't show up
Submitter : Tim Blechmann <tim@klingt.org>
Date : 2009-08-14 8:26 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125023842514480&w=4
Handled-By : Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread* [Bug #14015] pty regressed again, breaking expect and gcc's testsuite
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-19 20:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Mikael Pettersson
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14015
Subject : pty regressed again, breaking expect and gcc's testsuite
Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Date : 2009-08-14 23:41 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125029329805643&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14015] pty regressed again, breaking expect and gcc's testsuite
@ 2009-08-19 20:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Mikael Pettersson
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14015
Subject : pty regressed again, breaking expect and gcc's testsuite
Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe-1zs4UD6AkMk@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-14 23:41 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125029329805643&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14015] pty regressed again, breaking expect and gcc's testsuite
2009-08-19 20:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
@ 2009-08-24 10:08 ` Mikael Pettersson
2009-08-24 18:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 126+ messages in thread
From: Mikael Pettersson @ 2009-08-24 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Mikael Pettersson
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 22:27:02 +0200 (CEST), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14015
> Subject : pty regressed again, breaking expect and gcc's testsuite
> Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
> Date : 2009-08-14 23:41 (6 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125029329805643&w=3D4
The good news is that I don't see this issue any more with 2.6.31-rc7
on x86. The bad news is that the first time I reported this issue, for
-rc3 or -rc4 I think, I thought it was fixed in -rc5 only to see it
reappear in -rc6 on x86 and in -rc5 on ARM. So I'd like to keep this
open another week while I run more regression tests on non-x86 platforms.
While I don't suspect any arch-specific problems in the pty/tty code,
I do suspect timing/race-type problems which are obviously affected
by platform speed etc.
/Mikael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14015] pty regressed again, breaking expect and gcc's testsuite
@ 2009-08-24 18:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-24 18:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mikael Pettersson; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Monday 24 August 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 22:27:02 +0200 (CEST), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14015
> > Subject : pty regressed again, breaking expect and gcc's testsuite
> > Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
> > Date : 2009-08-14 23:41 (6 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125029329805643&w=3D4
>
> The good news is that I don't see this issue any more with 2.6.31-rc7
> on x86. The bad news is that the first time I reported this issue, for
> -rc3 or -rc4 I think, I thought it was fixed in -rc5 only to see it
> reappear in -rc6 on x86 and in -rc5 on ARM. So I'd like to keep this
> open another week while I run more regression tests on non-x86 platforms.
>
> While I don't suspect any arch-specific problems in the pty/tty code,
> I do suspect timing/race-type problems which are obviously affected
> by platform speed etc.
OK, thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14015] pty regressed again, breaking expect and gcc's testsuite
@ 2009-08-24 18:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-24 18:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mikael Pettersson; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Monday 24 August 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 22:27:02 +0200 (CEST), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14015
> > Subject : pty regressed again, breaking expect and gcc's testsuite
> > Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe-1zs4UD6AkMk@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-08-14 23:41 (6 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125029329805643&w=3D4
>
> The good news is that I don't see this issue any more with 2.6.31-rc7
> on x86. The bad news is that the first time I reported this issue, for
> -rc3 or -rc4 I think, I thought it was fixed in -rc5 only to see it
> reappear in -rc6 on x86 and in -rc5 on ARM. So I'd like to keep this
> open another week while I run more regression tests on non-x86 platforms.
>
> While I don't suspect any arch-specific problems in the pty/tty code,
> I do suspect timing/race-type problems which are obviously affected
> by platform speed etc.
OK, thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14016] mm/ipw2200 regression
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (28 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-08-19 20:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14016
Subject : mm/ipw2200 regression
Submitter : Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-15 16:56 (5 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125036437221408&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread* [Bug #14014] kernel bug at shut down
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-19 20:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Norbert Preining
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14014
Subject : kernel bug at shut down
Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
Date : 2009-08-14 9:11 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125024112418870&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14018] kernel freezes, inotify problem
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (30 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-08-19 20:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Christoph Thielecke, Eric Paris
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14018
Subject : kernel freezes, inotify problem
Submitter : Christoph Thielecke <christoph.thielecke@gmx.de>
Date : 2009-08-19 12:48 (1 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125068616818353&w=4
Handled-By : Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread* [Bug #14017] _end symbol missing from Symbol.map
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (31 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-08-19 20:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Hannes Reinecke
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14017
Subject : _end symbol missing from Symbol.map
Submitter : Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Date : 2009-08-13 6:45 (7 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=091e52c3551d3031343df24b573b770b4c6c72b6
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014649102253&w=4
Handled-By : Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014649102253&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread* Re: 2.6.31-rc6-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.30
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-20 20:52 ` John Dykstra
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: John Dykstra @ 2009-08-20 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List,
Linux Wireless List, DRI
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 22:20 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14002
> Subject : WARNING: at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:154
> inet_sock_destruct+0x164/0x1c0()
> Submitter : Ralf Hildebrandt <ralf.hildebrandt@charite.de>
> Date : 2009-08-18 12:37 (2 days old)
That looks similar to the WARNING discussed in [1].
There was no resolution to that thread. However, [2] points out
possible other occurrences of the problem in 2.6.27, 28 and 29.
-- John
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg103267.html
[2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg104120.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.31-rc6-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.30
@ 2009-08-20 20:52 ` John Dykstra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: John Dykstra @ 2009-08-20 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List,
Linux Wireless List, DRI
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 22:20 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14002
> Subject : WARNING: at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:154
> inet_sock_destruct+0x164/0x1c0()
> Submitter : Ralf Hildebrandt <ralf.hildebrandt-jq1tPX9l7E6ELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-08-18 12:37 (2 days old)
That looks similar to the WARNING discussed in [1].
There was no resolution to that thread. However, [2] points out
possible other occurrences of the problem in 2.6.27, 28 and 29.
-- John
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg103267.html
[2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg104120.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.31-rc6-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.30
2009-08-20 20:52 ` John Dykstra
(?)
@ 2009-08-20 21:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-20 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Dykstra
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List,
Linux Wireless List, DRI
On Thursday 20 August 2009, John Dykstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 22:20 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14002
> > Subject : WARNING: at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:154
> > inet_sock_destruct+0x164/0x1c0()
> > Submitter : Ralf Hildebrandt <ralf.hildebrandt@charite.de>
> > Date : 2009-08-18 12:37 (2 days old)
>
> That looks similar to the WARNING discussed in [1].
>
> There was no resolution to that thread. However, [2] points out
> possible other occurrences of the problem in 2.6.27, 28 and 29.
>
> -- John
>
> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg103267.html
> [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg104120.html
Thanks for the information.
So I'll drop this from the list, since it most probably is not a recent thing.
Best,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.31-rc6-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.30
2009-08-20 20:52 ` John Dykstra
(?)
(?)
@ 2009-08-20 21:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-20 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Dykstra
Cc: Adrian Bunk, DRI, Linux SCSI List, Network Development,
Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Natalie Protasevich, Linux ACPI, Andrew Morton,
Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds, Linux PM List
On Thursday 20 August 2009, John Dykstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 22:20 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14002
> > Subject : WARNING: at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:154
> > inet_sock_destruct+0x164/0x1c0()
> > Submitter : Ralf Hildebrandt <ralf.hildebrandt@charite.de>
> > Date : 2009-08-18 12:37 (2 days old)
>
> That looks similar to the WARNING discussed in [1].
>
> There was no resolution to that thread. However, [2] points out
> possible other occurrences of the problem in 2.6.27, 28 and 29.
>
> -- John
>
> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg103267.html
> [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg104120.html
Thanks for the information.
So I'll drop this from the list, since it most probably is not a recent thing.
Best,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.31-rc6-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.30
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (33 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-08-20 20:52 ` John Dykstra
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: John Dykstra @ 2009-08-20 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Adrian Bunk, DRI, Linux SCSI List, Network Development,
Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Natalie Protasevich, Linux ACPI, Andrew Morton,
Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds, Linux PM List
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 22:20 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14002
> Subject : WARNING: at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:154
> inet_sock_destruct+0x164/0x1c0()
> Submitter : Ralf Hildebrandt <ralf.hildebrandt@charite.de>
> Date : 2009-08-18 12:37 (2 days old)
That looks similar to the WARNING discussed in [1].
There was no resolution to that thread. However, [2] points out
possible other occurrences of the problem in 2.6.27, 28 and 29.
-- John
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg103267.html
[2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg104120.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread* Re: 2.6.31-rc6-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.30
2009-08-19 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-21 21:34 ` Larry Finger
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Larry Finger @ 2009-08-21 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List,
Linux Wireless List, DRI
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13960
> Subject : rtl8187 not connect to wifi
> Submitter : okias <d.okias@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-08-10 19:16 (10 days old)
The patch for this one was sent from Linville to DaveM earlier today,
and should be sent to mainline in the near future.
AFAIK, the OP has not yet tested the patch, but I think I was able to
reproduce the problem, and the patch did fit it for me.
Larry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.31-rc6-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.30
@ 2009-08-21 21:34 ` Larry Finger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Larry Finger @ 2009-08-21 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Adrian Bunk, DRI, Linux SCSI List, Network Development,
Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Natalie Protasevich, Linux ACPI, Andrew Morton,
Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds, Linux PM List
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13960
> Subject : rtl8187 not connect to wifi
> Submitter : okias <d.okias@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-08-10 19:16 (10 days old)
The patch for this one was sent from Linville to DaveM earlier today,
and should be sent to mainline in the near future.
AFAIK, the OP has not yet tested the patch, but I think I was able to
reproduce the problem, and the patch did fit it for me.
Larry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.31-rc6-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.30
2009-08-21 21:34 ` Larry Finger
(?)
@ 2009-08-21 22:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 23:25 ` Larry Finger
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-21 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Larry Finger
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List,
Linux Wireless List, DRI
On Friday 21 August 2009, Larry Finger wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13960
> > Subject : rtl8187 not connect to wifi
> > Submitter : okias <d.okias@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2009-08-10 19:16 (10 days old)
>
> The patch for this one was sent from Linville to DaveM earlier today,
> and should be sent to mainline in the near future.
>
> AFAIK, the OP has not yet tested the patch, but I think I was able to
> reproduce the problem, and the patch did fit it for me.
Thanks for the update.
Can you please close the bug when the patch is merged?
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.31-rc6-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.30
2009-08-21 22:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 23:25 ` Larry Finger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Larry Finger @ 2009-08-25 23:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List,
Linux Wireless List, DRI
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday 21 August 2009, Larry Finger wrote:
>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13960
>>> Subject : rtl8187 not connect to wifi
>>> Submitter : okias <d.okias@gmail.com>
>>> Date : 2009-08-10 19:16 (10 days old)
>> The patch for this one was sent from Linville to DaveM earlier today,
>> and should be sent to mainline in the near future.
>>
>> AFAIK, the OP has not yet tested the patch, but I think I was able to
>> reproduce the problem, and the patch did fit it for me.
>
> Thanks for the update.
>
> Can you please close the bug when the patch is merged?
The patch hit mainline as commit
1a9937b7f07ab6e35515e32a7625f0ba50ab7670. The bug has been closed.
Larry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.31-rc6-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.30
@ 2009-08-25 23:25 ` Larry Finger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Larry Finger @ 2009-08-25 23:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Adrian Bunk, DRI, Linux SCSI List, Network Development,
Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Natalie Protasevich, Linux ACPI, Andrew Morton,
Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds, Linux PM List
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday 21 August 2009, Larry Finger wrote:
>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13960
>>> Subject : rtl8187 not connect to wifi
>>> Submitter : okias <d.okias@gmail.com>
>>> Date : 2009-08-10 19:16 (10 days old)
>> The patch for this one was sent from Linville to DaveM earlier today,
>> and should be sent to mainline in the near future.
>>
>> AFAIK, the OP has not yet tested the patch, but I think I was able to
>> reproduce the problem, and the patch did fit it for me.
>
> Thanks for the update.
>
> Can you please close the bug when the patch is merged?
The patch hit mainline as commit
1a9937b7f07ab6e35515e32a7625f0ba50ab7670. The bug has been closed.
Larry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.31-rc6-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.30
2009-08-21 21:34 ` Larry Finger
(?)
(?)
@ 2009-08-21 22:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 126+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-21 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Larry Finger
Cc: Adrian Bunk, DRI, Linux SCSI List, Network Development,
Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Natalie Protasevich, Linux ACPI, Andrew Morton,
Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds, Linux PM List
On Friday 21 August 2009, Larry Finger wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13960
> > Subject : rtl8187 not connect to wifi
> > Submitter : okias <d.okias@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2009-08-10 19:16 (10 days old)
>
> The patch for this one was sent from Linville to DaveM earlier today,
> and should be sent to mainline in the near future.
>
> AFAIK, the OP has not yet tested the patch, but I think I was able to
> reproduce the problem, and the patch did fit it for me.
Thanks for the update.
Can you please close the bug when the patch is merged?
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 126+ messages in thread