From: Ryo Tsuruta <ryov@valinux.co.jp> To: nauman@google.com Cc: vgoyal@redhat.com, m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, dpshah@google.com, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, mikew@google.com, fchecconi@gmail.com, paolo.valente@unimore.it, fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp, s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com, taka@valinux.co.jp, guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com, jmoyer@redhat.com, dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, righi.andrea@gmail.com, agk@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org, jmarchan@redhat.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu, riel@redhat.com, yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp Subject: Re: IO scheduler based IO controller V10 Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:17:44 +0900 (JST) [thread overview] Message-ID: <20091006.161744.189719641.ryov@valinux.co.jp> (raw) In-Reply-To: <e98e18940910051111r110dc776l5105bf931761b842@mail.gmail.com> Hi Vivek and Nauman, Nauman Rafique <nauman@google.com> wrote: > >> > > How about adding a callback function to the higher level controller? > >> > > CFQ calls it when the active queue runs out of time, then the higer > >> > > level controller use it as a trigger or a hint to move IO group, so > >> > > I think a time-based controller could be implemented at higher level. > >> > > > >> > > >> > Adding a call back should not be a big issue. But that means you are > >> > planning to run only one group at higher layer at one time and I think > >> > that's the problem because than we are introducing serialization at higher > >> > layer. So any higher level device mapper target which has multiple > >> > physical disks under it, we might be underutilizing these even more and > >> > take a big hit on overall throughput. > >> > > >> > The whole design of doing proportional weight at lower layer is optimial > >> > usage of system. > >> > >> But I think that the higher level approch makes easy to configure > >> against striped software raid devices. > > > > How does it make easier to configure in case of higher level controller? > > > > In case of lower level design, one just have to create cgroups and assign > > weights to cgroups. This mininum step will be required in higher level > > controller also. (Even if you get rid of dm-ioband device setup step). In the case of lower level controller, if we need to assign weights on a per device basis, we have to assign weights to all devices of which a raid device consists, but in the case of higher level controller, we just assign weights to the raid device only. > >> If one would like to > >> combine some physical disks into one logical device like a dm-linear, > >> I think one should map the IO controller on each physical device and > >> combine them into one logical device. > >> > > > > In fact this sounds like a more complicated step where one has to setup > > one dm-ioband device on top of each physical device. But I am assuming > > that this will go away once you move to per reuqest queue like implementation. I don't understand why the per request queue implementation makes it go away. If dm-ioband is integrated into the LVM tools, it could allow users to skip the complicated steps to configure dm-linear devices. > > I think it should be same in principal as my initial implementation of IO > > controller on request queue and I stopped development on it because of FIFO > > dispatch. I think that FIFO dispatch seldom lead to prioviry inversion, because holding period for throttling is not too long to break the IO priority. I did some tests to see whether priority inversion is happened. The first test ran fio sequential readers on the same group. The BE0 reader got the highest throughput as I expected. nr_threads 16 | 16 | 1 ionice BE7 | BE7 | BE0 ------------------------+------------+------------- vanilla 10,076KiB/s | 9,779KiB/s | 32,775KiB/s ioband 9,576KiB/s | 9,367KiB/s | 34,154KiB/s The second test ran fio sequential readers on two different groups and give weights of 20 and 10 to each group respectively. The bandwidth was distributed according to their weights and the BE0 reader got higher throughput than the BE7 readers in the same group. IO priority was preserved within the IO group. group group1 | group2 weight 20 | 10 ------------------------+-------------------------- nr_threads 16 | 16 | 1 ionice BE7 | BE7 | BE0 ------------------------+-------------------------- ioband 27,513KiB/s | 3,524KiB/s | 10,248KiB/s | Total = 13,772KiB/s Here is my test script. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- arg="--time_base --rw=read --runtime=30 --directory=/mnt1 --size=1024M \ --group_reporting" sync echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches echo $$ > /cgroup/1/tasks ionice -c 2 -n 0 fio $arg --name=read1 --output=read1.log --numjobs=16 & echo $$ > /cgroup/2/tasks ionice -c 2 -n 0 fio $arg --name=read2 --output=read2.log --numjobs=16 & ionice -c 1 -n 0 fio $arg --name=read3 --output=read3.log --numjobs=1 & echo $$ > /cgroup/tasks wait ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Be that as it way, I think that if every bio can point the iocontext of the process, then it makes it possible to handle IO priority in the higher level controller. A patchse has already posted by Takhashi-san. What do you think about this idea? Date Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:51:31 +0900 (JST) Subject [RFC][PATCH 1/10] I/O context inheritance From Hirokazu Takahashi <> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/22/195 > > So you seem to be suggesting that you will move dm-ioband to request queue > > so that setting up additional device setup is gone. You will also enable > > it to do time based groups policy, so that we don't run into issues on > > seeky media. Will also enable dispatch from one group only at a time so > > that we don't run into isolation issues and can do time accounting > > accruately. > > Will that approach solve the problem of doing bandwidth control on > logical devices? What would be the advantages compared to Vivek's > current patches? I will only move the point where dm-ioband grabs bios, other dm-ioband's mechanism and functionality will stll be the same. The advantages against to scheduler based controllers are: - can work with any type of block devices - can work with any type of IO scheduler and no need a big change. > > If yes, then that has the potential to solve the issue. At higher layer one > > can think of enabling size of IO/number of IO policy both for proportional > > BW and max BW type of control. At lower level one can enable pure time > > based control on seeky media. > > > > I think this will still left with the issue of prio with-in group as group > > control is separate and you will not be maintatinig separate queues for > > each process. Similarly you will also have isseus with read vs write > > ratios as IO schedulers underneath change. > > > > So I will be curious to see that implementation. > > > >> > > My requirements for IO controller are: > >> > > - Implement s a higher level controller, which is located at block > >> > > layer and bio is grabbed in generic_make_request(). > >> > > >> > How are you planning to handle the issue of buffered writes Andrew raised? > >> > >> I think that it would be better to use the higher-level controller > >> along with the memory controller and have limits memory usage for each > >> cgroup. And as Kamezawa-san said, having limits of dirty pages would > >> be better, too. > >> > > > > Ok. So if we plan to co-mount memory controller with per memory group > > dirty_ratio implemented, that can work with both higher level as well as > > low level controller. Not sure if we also require some kind of a per > > memory group flusher thread infrastructure also to make sure higher weight > > group gets more job done. I'm not sure either that a per memory group flusher is necessary. An we have to consider not only pdflush but also other threads which issue IOs from multiple groups. > >> > > - Can work with any type of IO scheduler. > >> > > - Can work with any type of block devices. > >> > > - Support multiple policies, proportional wegiht, max rate, time > >> > > based, ans so on. > >> > > > >> > > The IO controller mini-summit will be held in next week, and I'm > >> > > looking forard to meet you all and discuss about IO controller. > >> > > https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/ioband/wiki/iosummit > >> > > >> > Is there a new version of dm-ioband now where you have solved the issue of > >> > sync/async dispatch with-in group? Before meeting at mini-summit, I am > >> > trying to run some tests and come up with numbers so that we have more > >> > clear picture of pros/cons. > >> > >> Yes, I've released new versions of dm-ioband and blkio-cgroup. The new > >> dm-ioband handles sync/async IO requests separately and > >> the write-starve-read issue you pointed out is fixed. I would > >> appreciate it if you would try them. > >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/ioband/files/ > > > > Cool. Will get to testing it. Thanks for your help in advance. Thanks, Ryo Tsuruta
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ryo Tsuruta <ryov@valinux.co.jp> To: nauman@google.com Cc: dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, dpshah@google.com, jens.axboe@oracle.com, agk@redhat.com, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, paolo.valente@unimore.it, jmarchan@redhat.com, guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com, fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp, mikew@google.com, yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp, jmoyer@redhat.com, mingo@elte.hu, vgoyal@redhat.com, righi.andrea@gmail.com, riel@redhat.com, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, fchecconi@gmail.com, s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: IO scheduler based IO controller V10 Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:17:44 +0900 (JST) [thread overview] Message-ID: <20091006.161744.189719641.ryov@valinux.co.jp> (raw) In-Reply-To: <e98e18940910051111r110dc776l5105bf931761b842@mail.gmail.com> Hi Vivek and Nauman, Nauman Rafique <nauman@google.com> wrote: > >> > > How about adding a callback function to the higher level controller? > >> > > CFQ calls it when the active queue runs out of time, then the higer > >> > > level controller use it as a trigger or a hint to move IO group, so > >> > > I think a time-based controller could be implemented at higher level. > >> > > > >> > > >> > Adding a call back should not be a big issue. But that means you are > >> > planning to run only one group at higher layer at one time and I think > >> > that's the problem because than we are introducing serialization at higher > >> > layer. So any higher level device mapper target which has multiple > >> > physical disks under it, we might be underutilizing these even more and > >> > take a big hit on overall throughput. > >> > > >> > The whole design of doing proportional weight at lower layer is optimial > >> > usage of system. > >> > >> But I think that the higher level approch makes easy to configure > >> against striped software raid devices. > > > > How does it make easier to configure in case of higher level controller? > > > > In case of lower level design, one just have to create cgroups and assign > > weights to cgroups. This mininum step will be required in higher level > > controller also. (Even if you get rid of dm-ioband device setup step). In the case of lower level controller, if we need to assign weights on a per device basis, we have to assign weights to all devices of which a raid device consists, but in the case of higher level controller, we just assign weights to the raid device only. > >> If one would like to > >> combine some physical disks into one logical device like a dm-linear, > >> I think one should map the IO controller on each physical device and > >> combine them into one logical device. > >> > > > > In fact this sounds like a more complicated step where one has to setup > > one dm-ioband device on top of each physical device. But I am assuming > > that this will go away once you move to per reuqest queue like implementation. I don't understand why the per request queue implementation makes it go away. If dm-ioband is integrated into the LVM tools, it could allow users to skip the complicated steps to configure dm-linear devices. > > I think it should be same in principal as my initial implementation of IO > > controller on request queue and I stopped development on it because of FIFO > > dispatch. I think that FIFO dispatch seldom lead to prioviry inversion, because holding period for throttling is not too long to break the IO priority. I did some tests to see whether priority inversion is happened. The first test ran fio sequential readers on the same group. The BE0 reader got the highest throughput as I expected. nr_threads 16 | 16 | 1 ionice BE7 | BE7 | BE0 ------------------------+------------+------------- vanilla 10,076KiB/s | 9,779KiB/s | 32,775KiB/s ioband 9,576KiB/s | 9,367KiB/s | 34,154KiB/s The second test ran fio sequential readers on two different groups and give weights of 20 and 10 to each group respectively. The bandwidth was distributed according to their weights and the BE0 reader got higher throughput than the BE7 readers in the same group. IO priority was preserved within the IO group. group group1 | group2 weight 20 | 10 ------------------------+-------------------------- nr_threads 16 | 16 | 1 ionice BE7 | BE7 | BE0 ------------------------+-------------------------- ioband 27,513KiB/s | 3,524KiB/s | 10,248KiB/s | Total = 13,772KiB/s Here is my test script. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- arg="--time_base --rw=read --runtime=30 --directory=/mnt1 --size=1024M \ --group_reporting" sync echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches echo $$ > /cgroup/1/tasks ionice -c 2 -n 0 fio $arg --name=read1 --output=read1.log --numjobs=16 & echo $$ > /cgroup/2/tasks ionice -c 2 -n 0 fio $arg --name=read2 --output=read2.log --numjobs=16 & ionice -c 1 -n 0 fio $arg --name=read3 --output=read3.log --numjobs=1 & echo $$ > /cgroup/tasks wait ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Be that as it way, I think that if every bio can point the iocontext of the process, then it makes it possible to handle IO priority in the higher level controller. A patchse has already posted by Takhashi-san. What do you think about this idea? Date Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:51:31 +0900 (JST) Subject [RFC][PATCH 1/10] I/O context inheritance From Hirokazu Takahashi <> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/22/195 > > So you seem to be suggesting that you will move dm-ioband to request queue > > so that setting up additional device setup is gone. You will also enable > > it to do time based groups policy, so that we don't run into issues on > > seeky media. Will also enable dispatch from one group only at a time so > > that we don't run into isolation issues and can do time accounting > > accruately. > > Will that approach solve the problem of doing bandwidth control on > logical devices? What would be the advantages compared to Vivek's > current patches? I will only move the point where dm-ioband grabs bios, other dm-ioband's mechanism and functionality will stll be the same. The advantages against to scheduler based controllers are: - can work with any type of block devices - can work with any type of IO scheduler and no need a big change. > > If yes, then that has the potential to solve the issue. At higher layer one > > can think of enabling size of IO/number of IO policy both for proportional > > BW and max BW type of control. At lower level one can enable pure time > > based control on seeky media. > > > > I think this will still left with the issue of prio with-in group as group > > control is separate and you will not be maintatinig separate queues for > > each process. Similarly you will also have isseus with read vs write > > ratios as IO schedulers underneath change. > > > > So I will be curious to see that implementation. > > > >> > > My requirements for IO controller are: > >> > > - Implement s a higher level controller, which is located at block > >> > > layer and bio is grabbed in generic_make_request(). > >> > > >> > How are you planning to handle the issue of buffered writes Andrew raised? > >> > >> I think that it would be better to use the higher-level controller > >> along with the memory controller and have limits memory usage for each > >> cgroup. And as Kamezawa-san said, having limits of dirty pages would > >> be better, too. > >> > > > > Ok. So if we plan to co-mount memory controller with per memory group > > dirty_ratio implemented, that can work with both higher level as well as > > low level controller. Not sure if we also require some kind of a per > > memory group flusher thread infrastructure also to make sure higher weight > > group gets more job done. I'm not sure either that a per memory group flusher is necessary. An we have to consider not only pdflush but also other threads which issue IOs from multiple groups. > >> > > - Can work with any type of IO scheduler. > >> > > - Can work with any type of block devices. > >> > > - Support multiple policies, proportional wegiht, max rate, time > >> > > based, ans so on. > >> > > > >> > > The IO controller mini-summit will be held in next week, and I'm > >> > > looking forard to meet you all and discuss about IO controller. > >> > > https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/ioband/wiki/iosummit > >> > > >> > Is there a new version of dm-ioband now where you have solved the issue of > >> > sync/async dispatch with-in group? Before meeting at mini-summit, I am > >> > trying to run some tests and come up with numbers so that we have more > >> > clear picture of pros/cons. > >> > >> Yes, I've released new versions of dm-ioband and blkio-cgroup. The new > >> dm-ioband handles sync/async IO requests separately and > >> the write-starve-read issue you pointed out is fixed. I would > >> appreciate it if you would try them. > >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/ioband/files/ > > > > Cool. Will get to testing it. Thanks for your help in advance. Thanks, Ryo Tsuruta
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-06 7:18 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 466+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2009-09-24 19:25 IO scheduler based IO controller V10 Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 01/28] io-controller: Documentation Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 02/28] io-controller: Core of the elevator fair queuing Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 03/28] io-controller: Keep a cache of recently expired queues Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 04/28] io-controller: Common flat fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 05/28] io-controller: Modify cfq to make use of flat elevator fair queuing Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 06/28] io-controller: Core scheduler changes to support hierarhical scheduling Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 07/28] io-controller: cgroup related changes for hierarchical group support Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 08/28] io-controller: Common hierarchical fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 09/28] io-controller: cfq changes to use " Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 10/28] io-controller: Export disk time used and nr sectors dipatched through cgroups Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 11/28] io-controller: Debug hierarchical IO scheduling Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 12/28] io-controller: Introduce group idling Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 13/28] io-controller: Implement wait busy for io queues Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 14/28] io-controller: Keep track of late preemptions Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 15/28] io-controller: Allow CFQ specific extra preemptions Vivek Goyal 2009-09-25 6:24 ` Gui Jianfeng 2009-09-25 6:24 ` Gui Jianfeng [not found] ` <1253820332-10246-16-git-send-email-vgoyal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-25 6:24 ` Gui Jianfeng 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 16/28] io-controller: Wait for requests to complete from last queue before new queue is scheduled Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 17/28] io-controller: Separate out queue and data Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 18/28] io-conroller: Prepare elevator layer for single queue schedulers Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 20/28] io-controller: noop changes for hierarchical fair queuing Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 21/28] io-controller: deadline " Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 22/28] io-controller: anticipatory " Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 23/28] io-controller: blkio_cgroup patches from Ryo to track async bios Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 24/28] io-controller: map async requests to appropriate cgroup Vivek Goyal [not found] ` <1253820332-10246-1-git-send-email-vgoyal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 01/28] io-controller: Documentation Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 02/28] io-controller: Core of the elevator fair queuing Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 03/28] io-controller: Keep a cache of recently expired queues Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 04/28] io-controller: Common flat fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 05/28] io-controller: Modify cfq to make use of flat elevator fair queuing Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 06/28] io-controller: Core scheduler changes to support hierarhical scheduling Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 07/28] io-controller: cgroup related changes for hierarchical group support Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 08/28] io-controller: Common hierarchical fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 09/28] io-controller: cfq changes to use " Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 10/28] io-controller: Export disk time used and nr sectors dipatched through cgroups Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 11/28] io-controller: Debug hierarchical IO scheduling Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 12/28] io-controller: Introduce group idling Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 13/28] io-controller: Implement wait busy for io queues Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 14/28] io-controller: Keep track of late preemptions Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 15/28] io-controller: Allow CFQ specific extra preemptions Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 16/28] io-controller: Wait for requests to complete from last queue before new queue is scheduled Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 17/28] io-controller: Separate out queue and data Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 18/28] io-conroller: Prepare elevator layer for single queue schedulers Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 19/28] io-controller: Avoid expiring ioq for single ioq scheduler if only root group Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 20/28] io-controller: noop changes for hierarchical fair queuing Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 21/28] io-controller: deadline " Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 22/28] io-controller: anticipatory " Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 23/28] io-controller: blkio_cgroup patches from Ryo to track async bios Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 24/28] io-controller: map async requests to appropriate cgroup Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 25/28] io-controller: Per cgroup request descriptor support Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 26/28] io-controller: Per io group bdi congestion interface Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 27/28] io-controller: Support per cgroup per device weights and io class Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 28/28] io-controller: debug elevator fair queuing support Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 21:33 ` IO scheduler based IO controller V10 Andrew Morton 2009-09-25 2:20 ` Ulrich Lukas 2009-09-29 0:37 ` Nauman Rafique 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 25/28] io-controller: Per cgroup request descriptor support Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 26/28] io-controller: Per io group bdi congestion interface Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 27/28] io-controller: Support per cgroup per device weights and io class Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 ` [PATCH 28/28] io-controller: debug elevator fair queuing support Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 21:33 ` IO scheduler based IO controller V10 Andrew Morton 2009-09-24 21:33 ` Andrew Morton 2009-09-25 1:09 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [not found] ` <20090925100952.55c2dd7a.kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-25 1:18 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki 2009-09-25 4:14 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-09-25 1:18 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki 2009-09-25 1:18 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki 2009-09-25 5:29 ` Balbir Singh 2009-09-25 7:09 ` Ryo Tsuruta 2009-09-25 7:09 ` Ryo Tsuruta [not found] ` <20090925052911.GK4590-SINUvgVNF2CyUtPGxGje5AC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-25 7:09 ` Ryo Tsuruta [not found] ` <20090925101821.1de8091a.kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-25 5:29 ` Balbir Singh 2009-09-25 4:14 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-09-25 4:14 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-09-25 5:04 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-09-25 5:04 ` Vivek Goyal [not found] ` <20090925050429.GB12555-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-25 9:07 ` Ryo Tsuruta 2009-09-25 9:07 ` Ryo Tsuruta 2009-09-25 9:07 ` Ryo Tsuruta 2009-09-25 14:33 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-09-25 14:33 ` Vivek Goyal [not found] ` <20090925143337.GA15007-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-28 7:30 ` Ryo Tsuruta 2009-09-28 7:30 ` Ryo Tsuruta [not found] ` <20090925.180724.104041942.ryov-jCdQPDEk3idL9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-25 14:33 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-09-25 15:04 ` Rik van Riel 2009-09-25 15:04 ` Rik van Riel 2009-09-25 15:04 ` Rik van Riel 2009-09-28 7:38 ` Ryo Tsuruta 2009-09-28 7:38 ` Ryo Tsuruta [not found] ` <4ABCDBFF.1020203-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-28 7:38 ` Ryo Tsuruta 2009-10-08 4:42 ` More performance numbers (Was: Re: IO scheduler based IO controller V10) Vivek Goyal 2009-10-08 4:42 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-08 8:34 ` Andrea Righi 2009-10-08 8:34 ` Andrea Righi [not found] ` <20091008044251.GA3490-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-08 8:34 ` Andrea Righi [not found] ` <20090924143315.781cd0ac.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-25 1:09 ` IO scheduler based IO controller V10 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki 2009-09-25 5:04 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-08 4:42 ` More performance numbers (Was: Re: IO scheduler based IO controller V10) Vivek Goyal 2009-10-10 19:53 ` Performance numbers with IO throttling patches " Vivek Goyal 2009-10-10 19:53 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-10 19:53 ` Vivek Goyal [not found] ` <20091010195316.GB16510-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-10 22:27 ` Andrea Righi 2009-10-10 22:27 ` Andrea Righi 2009-10-10 22:27 ` Andrea Righi 2009-10-11 12:32 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-11 12:32 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-12 21:11 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-12 21:11 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-17 15:18 ` Andrea Righi [not found] ` <20091012211120.GE7152-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-17 15:18 ` Andrea Righi 2009-10-12 21:11 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-09-25 2:20 ` IO scheduler based IO controller V10 Ulrich Lukas [not found] ` <4ABC28DE.7050809-7vBoImwI/YtIVYojq0lqJrNAH6kLmebB@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-25 20:26 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-09-25 20:26 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-09-25 20:26 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-09-26 14:51 ` Mike Galbraith [not found] ` <1253976676.7005.40.camel-YqMYhexLQo1vAv1Ojkdn7Q@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-27 6:55 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-09-27 6:55 ` Mike Galbraith [not found] ` <1254034500.7933.6.camel-YqMYhexLQo1vAv1Ojkdn7Q@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-27 16:42 ` Jens Axboe 2009-09-27 16:42 ` Jens Axboe [not found] ` <20090927164235.GA23126-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-27 18:15 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-09-30 19:58 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-09-27 18:15 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-09-28 4:04 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-09-28 5:55 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-09-28 17:48 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-09-28 17:48 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-09-28 18:24 ` Mike Galbraith [not found] ` <20090928174809.GB3643-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-28 18:24 ` Mike Galbraith [not found] ` <1254110648.7683.3.camel-YqMYhexLQo1vAv1Ojkdn7Q@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-28 5:55 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-09-28 17:48 ` Vivek Goyal [not found] ` <1254075359.7354.66.camel-YqMYhexLQo1vAv1Ojkdn7Q@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-28 4:04 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-09-30 19:58 ` Mike Galbraith [not found] ` <1254340730.7695.32.camel-YqMYhexLQo1vAv1Ojkdn7Q@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-30 20:05 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-09-30 20:05 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-09-30 20:24 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-09-30 20:24 ` Vivek Goyal [not found] ` <20090930202447.GA28236-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-01 7:33 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-01 7:33 ` Mike Galbraith [not found] ` <1254382405.7595.9.camel-YqMYhexLQo1vAv1Ojkdn7Q@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-01 18:58 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-01 18:58 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-02 6:23 ` Mike Galbraith [not found] ` <1254464628.7158.101.camel-YqMYhexLQo1vAv1Ojkdn7Q@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 8:04 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-02 8:04 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-02 8:04 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-02 8:53 ` Mike Galbraith [not found] ` <1254473609.6378.24.camel-YqMYhexLQo1vAv1Ojkdn7Q@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 9:00 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-02 9:55 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-02 9:00 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-02 9:55 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-02 12:22 ` Mike Galbraith [not found] ` <20091002095555.GB26962-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 12:22 ` Mike Galbraith [not found] ` <20091002080417.GG14918-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 8:53 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-02 9:24 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-10-02 9:24 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-10-02 9:24 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-10-02 9:28 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-02 9:28 ` Jens Axboe [not found] ` <20091002092839.GA26962-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 14:24 ` Linus Torvalds 2009-10-02 14:24 ` Linus Torvalds 2009-10-02 14:45 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-02 14:57 ` Jens Axboe [not found] ` <1254494742.7307.37.camel-YqMYhexLQo1vAv1Ojkdn7Q@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 14:57 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-02 14:56 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-02 14:56 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-02 15:14 ` Linus Torvalds 2009-10-02 15:14 ` Linus Torvalds 2009-10-02 16:01 ` jim owens 2009-10-02 16:01 ` jim owens 2009-10-02 17:11 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-02 17:11 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-02 17:20 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-10-02 17:20 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-10-02 17:25 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-02 17:25 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-02 17:28 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-10-02 17:28 ` Ingo Molnar [not found] ` <20091002172842.GA4884-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 17:37 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-02 17:37 ` Jens Axboe [not found] ` <20091002173732.GK31616-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 17:56 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-10-02 18:13 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-02 17:56 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-10-02 17:56 ` Ingo Molnar [not found] ` <20091002175629.GA14860-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 18:04 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-02 18:04 ` Jens Axboe [not found] ` <20091002180437.GL31616-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 18:22 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-02 18:36 ` Theodore Tso 2009-10-02 18:22 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-02 18:26 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-02 18:33 ` Mike Galbraith [not found] ` <20091002182608.GO31616-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 18:33 ` Mike Galbraith [not found] ` <1254507754.8667.15.camel-YqMYhexLQo1vAv1Ojkdn7Q@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 18:26 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-02 18:36 ` Theodore Tso 2009-10-02 18:45 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-02 18:45 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-02 19:01 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-10-02 19:09 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-02 19:09 ` Jens Axboe [not found] ` <20091002190110.GA25297-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 19:09 ` Jens Axboe [not found] ` <20091002184549.GS31616-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 19:01 ` Ingo Molnar [not found] ` <20091002183649.GE8161-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 18:45 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-02 18:13 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-02 18:19 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-02 18:57 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-02 20:47 ` Mike Galbraith [not found] ` <1254509838.8667.30.camel-YqMYhexLQo1vAv1Ojkdn7Q@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 20:47 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-03 5:48 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-03 5:56 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-03 6:31 ` tweaking IO latency [was Re: IO scheduler based IO controller V10] Mike Galbraith 2009-10-03 7:24 ` IO scheduler based IO controller V10 Jens Axboe 2009-10-03 9:00 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-03 9:12 ` Corrado Zoccolo 2009-10-03 9:12 ` Corrado Zoccolo [not found] ` <4e5e476b0910030212y50f97d97nc2e17c35d855cc63-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-03 13:18 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-03 13:18 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-03 13:18 ` Jens Axboe [not found] ` <1254560434.17052.14.camel-YqMYhexLQo1vAv1Ojkdn7Q@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-03 9:12 ` Corrado Zoccolo 2009-10-03 13:17 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-03 13:17 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-03 13:17 ` Jens Axboe [not found] ` <20091003072401.GV31616-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-03 9:00 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-03 11:29 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-03 11:29 ` Vivek Goyal [not found] ` <20091003112915.GA12925-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-03 12:40 ` Do not overload dispatch queue (Was: Re: IO scheduler based IO controller V10) Vivek Goyal 2009-10-03 12:40 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-03 12:40 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-03 13:21 ` Jens Axboe [not found] ` <20091003132115.GB31616-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-03 13:56 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-03 13:56 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-03 13:56 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-03 14:02 ` Mike Galbraith [not found] ` <1254578553.7499.5.camel-YqMYhexLQo1vAv1Ojkdn7Q@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-03 14:28 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-03 14:28 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-03 14:33 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-03 14:33 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-03 14:51 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-03 14:51 ` Mike Galbraith [not found] ` <1254581496.8293.8.camel-YqMYhexLQo1vAv1Ojkdn7Q@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-03 15:14 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-03 15:14 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-03 15:14 ` Jens Axboe [not found] ` <20091003151445.GF31616-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-03 15:57 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-03 15:57 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-03 17:35 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-03 17:35 ` Jens Axboe [not found] ` <20091003173532.GG31616-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-03 17:45 ` Linus Torvalds 2009-10-03 17:45 ` Linus Torvalds [not found] ` <alpine.LFD.2.01.0910031042560.6996-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-03 17:51 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-03 17:51 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-03 19:07 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-03 19:07 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-03 19:07 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-03 19:11 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-03 19:11 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-03 19:23 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-03 19:23 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-03 19:49 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-03 19:49 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-04 10:50 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-04 11:33 ` Mike Galbraith [not found] ` <1254653434.7237.18.camel-YqMYhexLQo1vAv1Ojkdn7Q@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-04 17:39 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-04 17:39 ` Jens Axboe [not found] ` <20091004173901.GD26573-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-04 18:23 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-04 18:23 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-04 18:23 ` Mike Galbraith [not found] ` <1254680622.27889.2.camel-YqMYhexLQo1vAv1Ojkdn7Q@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-04 18:38 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-04 18:38 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-04 18:38 ` Jens Axboe [not found] ` <20091004183822.GF26573-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-04 19:47 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-04 19:47 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-04 19:47 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-04 20:17 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-04 20:17 ` Jens Axboe [not found] ` <20091004201708.GJ26573-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-04 22:15 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-04 22:15 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-04 22:15 ` Mike Galbraith [not found] ` <1254685638.7637.6.camel-YqMYhexLQo1vAv1Ojkdn7Q@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-04 20:17 ` Jens Axboe [not found] ` <20091003192321.GA26573-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-03 19:49 ` Mike Galbraith [not found] ` <1254596864.7153.9.camel-YqMYhexLQo1vAv1Ojkdn7Q@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-03 19:11 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-03 19:23 ` Jens Axboe [not found] ` <1254585420.7539.2.camel-YqMYhexLQo1vAv1Ojkdn7Q@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-03 17:35 ` Jens Axboe [not found] ` <20091003142840.GE31616-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-03 14:33 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-03 14:51 ` Mike Galbraith [not found] ` <20091003135623.GD12925-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-03 14:02 ` Mike Galbraith [not found] ` <20091003124049.GB12925-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-03 13:21 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-03 13:57 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-03 13:57 ` Mike Galbraith [not found] ` <1254549378.8299.21.camel-YqMYhexLQo1vAv1Ojkdn7Q@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-03 6:31 ` tweaking IO latency [was Re: IO scheduler based IO controller V10] Mike Galbraith 2009-10-03 7:24 ` IO scheduler based IO controller V10 Jens Axboe 2009-10-03 11:29 ` Vivek Goyal [not found] ` <1254548931.8299.18.camel-YqMYhexLQo1vAv1Ojkdn7Q@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-03 5:56 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-03 7:20 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-10-03 7:20 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-10-03 7:20 ` Ingo Molnar [not found] ` <20091003072021.GB21407-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-03 7:25 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-03 7:25 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-03 7:25 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-03 8:53 ` Mike Galbraith [not found] ` <20091003072540.GW31616-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-03 8:53 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-03 9:01 ` Corrado Zoccolo 2009-10-03 9:01 ` Corrado Zoccolo [not found] ` <20091002181903.GN31616-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 18:57 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-03 5:48 ` Mike Galbraith [not found] ` <1254507215.8667.7.camel-YqMYhexLQo1vAv1Ojkdn7Q@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 18:19 ` Jens Axboe [not found] ` <20091002172554.GJ31616-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 17:28 ` Ingo Molnar [not found] ` <20091002172046.GA2376-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 17:25 ` Jens Axboe [not found] ` <20091002171129.GG31616-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 17:20 ` Ingo Molnar [not found] ` <alpine.LFD.2.01.0910020811490.6996-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 16:01 ` jim owens 2009-10-02 17:11 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-02 16:33 ` Ray Lee 2009-10-02 17:13 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-02 17:13 ` Jens Axboe [not found] ` <2c0942db0910020933l6d312c6ahae0e00619f598b39-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 17:13 ` Jens Axboe [not found] ` <20091002145610.GD31616-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 15:14 ` Linus Torvalds 2009-10-02 16:33 ` Ray Lee [not found] ` <alpine.LFD.2.01.0910020715160.6996-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 14:45 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-02 14:56 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-02 16:22 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-10-02 16:22 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-10-02 16:22 ` Ingo Molnar [not found] ` <20091002092409.GA19529-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 9:28 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-02 9:36 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-02 9:36 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-02 16:37 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-10-02 16:37 ` Ingo Molnar [not found] ` <1254476214.11022.8.camel-YqMYhexLQo1vAv1Ojkdn7Q@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 16:37 ` Ingo Molnar [not found] ` <20091001185816.GU14918-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 6:23 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-02 18:08 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-02 18:08 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-02 18:29 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-02 18:36 ` Jens Axboe [not found] ` <1254508197.8667.22.camel-YqMYhexLQo1vAv1Ojkdn7Q@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 18:36 ` Jens Axboe [not found] ` <20091002180857.GM31616-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 18:29 ` Mike Galbraith [not found] ` <1254341139.7695.36.camel-YqMYhexLQo1vAv1Ojkdn7Q@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-30 20:24 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-09-27 17:00 ` Corrado Zoccolo 2009-09-28 14:56 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-09-28 14:56 ` Vivek Goyal [not found] ` <20090928145655.GB8192-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-28 15:35 ` Corrado Zoccolo 2009-09-28 15:35 ` Corrado Zoccolo 2009-09-28 17:14 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-09-28 17:14 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-09-29 7:10 ` Corrado Zoccolo [not found] ` <20090928171420.GA3643-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-29 7:10 ` Corrado Zoccolo 2009-09-28 17:51 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-09-28 18:18 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-09-28 18:18 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-09-28 18:53 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-09-29 7:14 ` Corrado Zoccolo [not found] ` <1254164034.9820.81.camel-YqMYhexLQo1vAv1Ojkdn7Q@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-29 7:14 ` Corrado Zoccolo [not found] ` <20090928181846.GC3643-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-28 18:53 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-09-29 5:55 ` Mike Galbraith [not found] ` <1254160274.9820.25.camel-YqMYhexLQo1vAv1Ojkdn7Q@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-28 18:18 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-09-29 5:55 ` Mike Galbraith [not found] ` <4e5e476b0909280835w3410d58aod93a29d1dcda8909-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-28 17:14 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-09-28 17:51 ` Mike Galbraith [not found] ` <4e5e476b0909271000u69d79346s27cccad219e49902-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-28 14:56 ` Vivek Goyal [not found] ` <20090925202636.GC15007-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-26 14:51 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-09-27 17:00 ` Corrado Zoccolo 2009-09-29 0:37 ` Nauman Rafique 2009-09-29 0:37 ` Nauman Rafique 2009-09-29 3:22 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-09-29 3:22 ` Vivek Goyal [not found] ` <20090929032255.GA10664-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-29 9:56 ` Ryo Tsuruta 2009-09-29 9:56 ` Ryo Tsuruta 2009-09-29 10:49 ` Takuya Yoshikawa 2009-09-29 14:10 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-09-29 14:10 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-09-29 19:53 ` Nauman Rafique [not found] ` <20090929141049.GA12141-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-29 19:53 ` Nauman Rafique 2009-09-30 8:43 ` Ryo Tsuruta 2009-09-30 8:43 ` Ryo Tsuruta 2009-09-30 11:05 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-09-30 11:05 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-01 6:41 ` Ryo Tsuruta 2009-10-01 6:41 ` Ryo Tsuruta [not found] ` <20091001.154125.104044685.ryov-jCdQPDEk3idL9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-01 13:31 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-01 13:31 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-01 13:31 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-02 2:57 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-02 2:57 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-02 20:27 ` Munehiro Ikeda 2009-10-02 20:27 ` Munehiro Ikeda [not found] ` <4AC6623F.70600-MDRzhb/z0dd8UrSeD/g0lQ@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-05 10:38 ` Ryo Tsuruta 2009-10-05 10:38 ` Ryo Tsuruta 2009-10-05 10:38 ` Ryo Tsuruta [not found] ` <20091005.193808.104033719.ryov-jCdQPDEk3idL9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-05 12:31 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-05 12:31 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-05 12:31 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-05 14:55 ` Ryo Tsuruta 2009-10-05 14:55 ` Ryo Tsuruta 2009-10-05 17:10 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-05 17:10 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-05 18:11 ` Nauman Rafique 2009-10-05 18:11 ` Nauman Rafique [not found] ` <e98e18940910051111r110dc776l5105bf931761b842-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-06 7:17 ` Ryo Tsuruta 2009-10-06 7:17 ` Ryo Tsuruta [this message] 2009-10-06 7:17 ` Ryo Tsuruta 2009-10-06 11:22 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-06 11:22 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-07 14:38 ` Ryo Tsuruta 2009-10-07 14:38 ` Ryo Tsuruta 2009-10-07 15:09 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-07 15:09 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-08 2:18 ` Ryo Tsuruta 2009-10-08 2:18 ` Ryo Tsuruta [not found] ` <20091007150929.GB3674-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-08 2:18 ` Ryo Tsuruta 2009-10-07 16:41 ` Rik van Riel 2009-10-07 16:41 ` Rik van Riel 2009-10-07 20:23 ` Andy [not found] ` <4ACCC4B7.4050805-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-08 10:22 ` Ryo Tsuruta 2009-10-08 10:22 ` Ryo Tsuruta 2009-10-08 10:22 ` Ryo Tsuruta [not found] ` <20091007.233805.183040347.ryov-jCdQPDEk3idL9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-07 15:09 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-07 16:41 ` Rik van Riel [not found] ` <20091006112201.GA27866-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-07 14:38 ` Ryo Tsuruta [not found] ` <20091006.161744.189719641.ryov-jCdQPDEk3idL9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-06 11:22 ` Vivek Goyal [not found] ` <20091005171023.GG22143-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-05 18:11 ` Nauman Rafique [not found] ` <20091005.235535.193690928.ryov-jCdQPDEk3idL9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-05 17:10 ` Vivek Goyal [not found] ` <20091005123148.GB22143-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-05 14:55 ` Ryo Tsuruta [not found] ` <20091002025731.GA2738-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 20:27 ` Munehiro Ikeda [not found] ` <20091001133109.GA4058-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 2:57 ` Vivek Goyal [not found] ` <20090930110500.GA26631-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-01 6:41 ` Ryo Tsuruta [not found] ` <20090930.174319.183036386.ryov-jCdQPDEk3idL9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-30 11:05 ` Vivek Goyal [not found] ` <20090929.185653.183056711.ryov-jCdQPDEk3idL9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-29 10:49 ` Takuya Yoshikawa 2009-09-29 14:10 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-09-30 3:11 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-09-30 3:11 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-09-30 3:11 ` Vivek Goyal [not found] ` <e98e18940909281737q142c788dpd20b8bdc05dd0eff-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-29 3:22 ` Vivek Goyal -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2009-10-02 10:55 Corrado Zoccolo 2009-10-02 10:55 Corrado Zoccolo 2009-10-02 11:04 ` Jens Axboe [not found] ` <200910021255.27689.czoccolo-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 11:04 ` Jens Axboe 2009-10-02 12:49 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-02 12:49 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-02 12:49 ` Vivek Goyal [not found] ` <20091002124921.GA4494-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 15:27 ` Corrado Zoccolo 2009-10-02 15:27 ` Corrado Zoccolo 2009-10-02 15:31 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-02 15:31 ` Vivek Goyal [not found] ` <4e5e476b0910020827s23e827b1n847c64e355999d4a-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 15:31 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-02 15:32 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-02 15:32 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-02 15:32 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-02 15:40 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-02 15:40 ` Vivek Goyal [not found] ` <20091002154020.GC4494-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 16:03 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-02 16:50 ` Valdis.Kletnieks-PjAqaU27lzQ 2009-10-02 16:03 ` Mike Galbraith 2009-10-02 16:50 ` Valdis.Kletnieks 2009-10-02 16:50 ` Valdis.Kletnieks [not found] ` <12774.1254502217-+bZmOdGhbsPr6rcHtW+onFJE71vCis6O@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 19:58 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-02 19:58 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-02 19:58 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-02 22:14 ` Corrado Zoccolo 2009-10-02 22:14 ` Corrado Zoccolo [not found] ` <4e5e476b0910021514i1b461229t667bed94fd67f140-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 22:27 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-02 22:27 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-02 22:27 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-10-03 12:43 ` Corrado Zoccolo [not found] ` <20091002222756.GG4494-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-03 12:43 ` Corrado Zoccolo [not found] ` <20091002195815.GE4494-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 22:14 ` Corrado Zoccolo [not found] ` <1254497520.10392.11.camel-YqMYhexLQo1vAv1Ojkdn7Q@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 15:40 ` Vivek Goyal 2009-09-24 19:25 Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20091006.161744.189719641.ryov@valinux.co.jp \ --to=ryov@valinux.co.jp \ --cc=agk@redhat.com \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \ --cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \ --cc=dpshah@google.com \ --cc=fchecconi@gmail.com \ --cc=fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp \ --cc=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \ --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \ --cc=jmarchan@redhat.com \ --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \ --cc=m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com \ --cc=mikew@google.com \ --cc=mingo@elte.hu \ --cc=nauman@google.com \ --cc=paolo.valente@unimore.it \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=riel@redhat.com \ --cc=righi.andrea@gmail.com \ --cc=s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com \ --cc=taka@valinux.co.jp \ --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \ --cc=yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.