All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: sfr@canb.auug.org.au
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mchan@broadcom.com, shmulikr@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 23:19:30 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091012.231930.141968218.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091013153308.af56910a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:33:08 +1100

> Today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this:
> 
> drivers/net/cnic.c: In function 'cnic_init_storm_conn_bufs':
> drivers/net/cnic.c:1757: error: implicit declaration of functi
> on 'csum_ipv6_magic'
> 
> Caused by commit 71034ba845c9ff219373066f904286c0b7506922 ("cnic: Add
> main functions to support bnx2x devices") which I have reverted for today.

It's because x86 and sparc64 seem to get the ipv6 checksum header
implicitly somehow.

I'll fix this as follows, thanks for the report Stephen:

cnic: Need to include net/ip6_checksum.h

drivers/net/cnic.c: In function 'cnic_init_storm_conn_bufs':
drivers/net/cnic.c:1757: error: implicit declaration of function 'csum_ipv6_magic'

Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---
 drivers/net/cnic.c |    1 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/cnic.c b/drivers/net/cnic.c
index 6e7af7b..333b1d1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/cnic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/cnic.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
 #include <net/route.h>
 #include <net/ipv6.h>
 #include <net/ip6_route.h>
+#include <net/ip6_checksum.h>
 #include <scsi/iscsi_if.h>
 
 #include "cnic_if.h"
-- 
1.6.4.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-10-13  6:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 101+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-13  4:33 linux-next: net tree build failure Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-13  5:14 ` Michael Chan
2009-10-13  6:20   ` David Miller
2009-10-13  6:19 ` David Miller [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-27  2:18 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-27  4:49 ` David Miller
2010-01-11  7:42 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-11  7:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-11  8:02 ` David Miller
2010-01-11  8:16   ` Joe Perches
2010-01-11  8:44     ` David Miller
2010-01-11  8:49       ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-11 11:16     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2009-11-18  5:51 Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-18  7:05 ` David Miller
2009-11-19 10:51   ` Shreyas Bhatewara
2009-11-14  6:50 Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-14  6:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-14 13:18 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-11-09  2:21 Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-09  2:21 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-09  4:41 ` David Miller
2009-06-17  6:31 Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-17  8:36 ` David Miller
2009-06-17 13:10   ` Stephen Rothwell
     [not found] <20090521001928.4bf71911.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
2009-05-20 14:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-05-20 19:44   ` David Miller
2009-04-24  7:01 Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-24 11:53 ` David Miller
2009-04-24 11:57   ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-22  0:29 Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-22  0:37 ` Alexander Beregalov
2009-04-22  1:12   ` David Miller
2009-04-20  1:26 Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-20  1:36 ` Alexander Beregalov
2009-04-20  1:43   ` David Miller
2009-04-20  1:50     ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-19  4:46 Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-19  5:40 ` David Miller
2009-04-01 19:58   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-01 21:22     ` David Miller
2009-03-30  1:15 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-30  1:50   ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-02  7:05 Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-02  9:49 ` David Miller
2009-03-02 16:38   ` Andy Grover
2009-03-03  1:55   ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-03  3:22     ` Andy Grover
2009-01-26  2:53 Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-26  4:46 ` David Miller
2009-01-26  5:15   ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-26  5:17     ` David Miller
2009-01-26  8:31       ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-26 19:40         ` David Miller
2009-01-23  7:28 Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-23  7:56 ` David Miller
2009-01-23  8:01   ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-23  8:13     ` David Miller
2009-01-23 10:21       ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-23 10:39         ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-23 10:50           ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-24  6:27             ` David Miller
2008-12-09  6:29 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-09  8:04 ` David Miller
2008-12-09  8:54   ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-09  9:05     ` David Miller
2008-12-09  9:12       ` Marcel Holtmann
2008-11-28  3:46 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-28  7:07 ` David Miller
2008-11-26  7:15 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-26  7:51 ` Herbert Xu
2008-11-26  8:45 ` David Miller
2008-11-26  9:40   ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-24  2:43 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-24  3:56 ` David Miller
2008-11-24  4:03   ` David Miller
2008-11-24  4:25   ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-24  4:28     ` David Miller
2008-11-24  4:49       ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-24  5:04         ` David Miller
2008-11-24  5:20           ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-24  5:22             ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-24  5:23             ` David Miller
2008-11-24  5:29               ` David Miller
2008-11-24  5:45                 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-24  5:38               ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-24 21:00                 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-11-24 21:52                   ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-11-24 22:12                     ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-11-25  8:42                       ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-25  9:01                         ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-11-21  2:44 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-21  4:02 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-11-21  4:13   ` David Miller
2008-11-20  2:58 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-20  2:30 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-29  6:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-13  5:03 Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-13  6:24 ` David Miller
2008-09-13  9:42   ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-15  0:54 ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091012.231930.141968218.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=shmulikr@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.