All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
To: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: [PATCH -mmotm 4/8] memcg: cleanup mem_cgroup_move_parent()
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 14:13:01 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091106141301.497f2cef.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091106141011.3ded1551.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>

mem_cgroup_move_parent() calls try_charge first and cancel_charge on failure.
IMHO, charge/uncharge(especially charge) is high cost operation, so we should
avoid it as far as possible.

This patch tries to delay try_charge in mem_cgroup_move_parent() by re-ordering
checks it does.

And this patch renames mem_cgroup_move_account() to __mem_cgroup_move_account(),
changes the return value of __mem_cgroup_move_account() from int to void,
and adds a new wrapper(mem_cgroup_move_account()), which checks whether a @pc
is valid for moving account and calls __mem_cgroup_move_account().

This patch removes the last caller of trylock_page_cgroup(), so removes its
definition too.

Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
---
 include/linux/page_cgroup.h |    7 +---
 mm/memcontrol.c             |   84 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/page_cgroup.h b/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
index 4b938d4..b0e4eb1 100644
--- a/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
+++ b/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
@@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ static inline void ClearPageCgroup##uname(struct page_cgroup *pc)	\
 static inline int TestClearPageCgroup##uname(struct page_cgroup *pc)	\
 	{ return test_and_clear_bit(PCG_##lname, &pc->flags);  }
 
+TESTPCGFLAG(Locked, LOCK)
+
 /* Cache flag is set only once (at allocation) */
 TESTPCGFLAG(Cache, CACHE)
 CLEARPCGFLAG(Cache, CACHE)
@@ -86,11 +88,6 @@ static inline void lock_page_cgroup(struct page_cgroup *pc)
 	bit_spin_lock(PCG_LOCK, &pc->flags);
 }
 
-static inline int trylock_page_cgroup(struct page_cgroup *pc)
-{
-	return bit_spin_trylock(PCG_LOCK, &pc->flags);
-}
-
 static inline void unlock_page_cgroup(struct page_cgroup *pc)
 {
 	bit_spin_unlock(PCG_LOCK, &pc->flags);
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 05e837c..1ad3248 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1613,27 +1613,22 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_commit_charge(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
 }
 
 /**
- * mem_cgroup_move_account - move account of the page
+ * __mem_cgroup_move_account - move account of the page
  * @pc:	page_cgroup of the page.
  * @from: mem_cgroup which the page is moved from.
  * @to:	mem_cgroup which the page is moved to. @from != @to.
  *
  * The caller must confirm following.
  * - page is not on LRU (isolate_page() is useful.)
- *
- * returns 0 at success,
- * returns -EBUSY when lock is busy or "pc" is unstable.
+ * - the pc is locked, used, and ->mem_cgroup points to @from.
  *
  * This function does "uncharge" from old cgroup but doesn't do "charge" to
  * new cgroup. It should be done by a caller.
  */
 
-static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc,
+static void __mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc,
 	struct mem_cgroup *from, struct mem_cgroup *to)
 {
-	struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *from_mz, *to_mz;
-	int nid, zid;
-	int ret = -EBUSY;
 	struct page *page;
 	int cpu;
 	struct mem_cgroup_stat *stat;
@@ -1641,20 +1636,9 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc,
 
 	VM_BUG_ON(from == to);
 	VM_BUG_ON(PageLRU(pc->page));
-
-	nid = page_cgroup_nid(pc);
-	zid = page_cgroup_zid(pc);
-	from_mz =  mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(from, nid, zid);
-	to_mz =  mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(to, nid, zid);
-
-	if (!trylock_page_cgroup(pc))
-		return ret;
-
-	if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc))
-		goto out;
-
-	if (pc->mem_cgroup != from)
-		goto out;
+	VM_BUG_ON(!PageCgroupLocked(pc));
+	VM_BUG_ON(!PageCgroupUsed(pc));
+	VM_BUG_ON(pc->mem_cgroup != from);
 
 	if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(from))
 		res_counter_uncharge(&from->res, PAGE_SIZE);
@@ -1683,15 +1667,28 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc,
 	css_get(&to->css);
 	pc->mem_cgroup = to;
 	mem_cgroup_charge_statistics(to, pc, true);
-	ret = 0;
-out:
-	unlock_page_cgroup(pc);
 	/*
 	 * We charges against "to" which may not have any tasks. Then, "to"
 	 * can be under rmdir(). But in current implementation, caller of
 	 * this function is just force_empty() and it's garanteed that
 	 * "to" is never removed. So, we don't check rmdir status here.
 	 */
+}
+
+/*
+ * check whether the @pc is valid for moving account and call
+ * __mem_cgroup_move_account()
+ */
+static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc,
+				struct mem_cgroup *from, struct mem_cgroup *to)
+{
+	int ret = -EINVAL;
+	lock_page_cgroup(pc);
+	if (PageCgroupUsed(pc) && pc->mem_cgroup == from) {
+		__mem_cgroup_move_account(pc, from, to);
+		ret = 0;
+	}
+	unlock_page_cgroup(pc);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -1713,38 +1710,27 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_parent(struct page_cgroup *pc,
 	if (!pcg)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	ret = -EBUSY;
+	if (!get_page_unless_zero(page))
+		goto out;
+	if (isolate_lru_page(page))
+		goto put;
 
 	parent = mem_cgroup_from_cont(pcg);
-
-
 	ret = __mem_cgroup_try_charge(NULL, gfp_mask, &parent, false, page);
 	if (ret || !parent)
-		return ret;
-
-	if (!get_page_unless_zero(page)) {
-		ret = -EBUSY;
-		goto uncharge;
-	}
-
-	ret = isolate_lru_page(page);
-
-	if (ret)
-		goto cancel;
+		goto put_back;
 
 	ret = mem_cgroup_move_account(pc, child, parent);
-
+	if (!ret)
+		css_put(&parent->css);	/* drop extra refcnt by try_charge() */
+	else
+		mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(parent);	/* does css_put */
+put_back:
 	putback_lru_page(page);
-	if (!ret) {
-		put_page(page);
-		/* drop extra refcnt by try_charge() */
-		css_put(&parent->css);
-		return 0;
-	}
-
-cancel:
+put:
 	put_page(page);
-uncharge:
-	mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(parent);
+out:
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
1.5.6.1

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-06  5:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-06  5:10 [PATCH -mmotm 0/8] memcg: recharge at task move Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  5:11 ` [PATCH -mmotm 1/8] cgroup: introduce cancel_attach() Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-09  6:57   ` Balbir Singh
2009-11-09  7:18     ` Li Zefan
2009-11-09  7:23     ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-09  7:23   ` Li Zefan
2009-11-09  7:38     ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  5:11 ` [PATCH -mmotm 2/8] memcg: move memcg_tasklist mutex Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  5:54   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-06  7:49     ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  8:02       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-10 19:14   ` Balbir Singh
2009-11-10 23:44     ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  5:12 ` [PATCH -mmotm 3/8] memcg: add mem_cgroup_cancel_charge() Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  5:13 ` Daisuke Nishimura [this message]
2009-11-06  5:56   ` [PATCH -mmotm 4/8] memcg: cleanup mem_cgroup_move_parent() KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-06  5:14 ` [PATCH -mmotm 5/8] memcg: add interface to recharge at task move Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  6:06   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-06  5:14 ` [PATCH -mmotm 6/8] memcg: recharge charges of anonymous page Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  6:35   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-09  0:31     ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  5:15 ` [PATCH -mmotm 7/8] memcg: avoid oom during recharge at task move Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  6:39   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-06  5:16 ` [PATCH -mmotm 8/8] memcg: recharge charges of anonymous swap Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-06  6:45 ` [PATCH -mmotm 0/8] memcg: recharge at task move KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-09  1:44   ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-09  5:16     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-09  5:08 ` Balbir Singh
2009-11-09  8:24   ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-11  1:35 ` [PATCH -mmotm 0/3] some cleanups for memcg Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-11  1:36   ` [PATCH -mmotm 1/3] memcg: add mem_cgroup_cancel_charge() Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-11  4:24     ` Balbir Singh
2009-11-11  1:37   ` [PATCH -mmotm 2/3] memcg: cleanup mem_cgroup_move_parent() Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-11 14:40     ` Balbir Singh
2009-11-11 15:16       ` Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-11  1:39   ` [PATCH -mmotm 3/3] memcg: remove memcg_tasklist Daisuke Nishimura
2009-11-11  1:49     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-11 16:01     ` Balbir Singh
2009-11-12  8:05       ` Daisuke Nishimura

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091106141301.497f2cef.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --to=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.