All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
	cl@linux-foundation.org,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] memcg make use of new percpu implementations
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:34:21 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091109070421.GD3042@balbir.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091106175242.6e13ee29.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

* KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> [2009-11-06 17:52:42]:

> Hi,
> 
> Recent updates on dynamic percpu allocation looks good and I tries to rewrite
> memcg's poor implementation of percpu status counter.
> (It's not NUMA-aware ...)
> Thanks for great works.
> 
> For this time. I added Christoph to CC because I'm not fully sure my usage of
> __this_cpu_xxx is correct...I'm glad if you check the usage when you have time.
> 
> 
> Patch 1/2 is just clean up (prepare for patch 2/2)
> Patch 2/2 is for percpu.
> 
> Tested on my 8cpu box and works well.
> Pathcesa are against the latest mmotm.

How do the test results look? DO you see a significant boost? BTW,
I've been experimenting a bit with the earlier percpu counter patches,
I might post an iteration once I have some good results.

-- 
	Balbir

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
	cl@linux-foundation.org,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] memcg make use of new percpu implementations
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:34:21 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091109070421.GD3042@balbir.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091106175242.6e13ee29.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

* KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> [2009-11-06 17:52:42]:

> Hi,
> 
> Recent updates on dynamic percpu allocation looks good and I tries to rewrite
> memcg's poor implementation of percpu status counter.
> (It's not NUMA-aware ...)
> Thanks for great works.
> 
> For this time. I added Christoph to CC because I'm not fully sure my usage of
> __this_cpu_xxx is correct...I'm glad if you check the usage when you have time.
> 
> 
> Patch 1/2 is just clean up (prepare for patch 2/2)
> Patch 2/2 is for percpu.
> 
> Tested on my 8cpu box and works well.
> Pathcesa are against the latest mmotm.

How do the test results look? DO you see a significant boost? BTW,
I've been experimenting a bit with the earlier percpu counter patches,
I might post an iteration once I have some good results.

-- 
	Balbir

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-09  7:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-06  8:52 [PATCH 0/2] memcg make use of new percpu implementations KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-06  8:52 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-06  8:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] memcg : rename index to short name KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-06  8:54   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-06  8:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] memcg : rewrite percpu countings with new interfaces KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-06  8:55   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-06 17:27   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-11-06 17:27     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-11-06 18:44     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-06 18:44       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-09  6:44   ` [PATCH 2/2] memcg : rewrite percpu countings with new interfaces v2 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-09  6:44     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-09  7:07   ` [PATCH 2/2] memcg : rewrite percpu countings with new interfaces Balbir Singh
2009-11-09  7:07     ` Balbir Singh
2009-11-09  8:36     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-09  8:36       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-09  7:04 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2009-11-09  7:04   ` [PATCH 0/2] memcg make use of new percpu implementations Balbir Singh
2009-11-09  7:34   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-09  7:34     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091109070421.GD3042@balbir.in.ibm.com \
    --to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.