From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org> Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>, "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>, Holger Schurig <holgerschurig@googlemail.com> Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the wireless-current tree Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 09:54:32 +1100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20091229095432.f39a887e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> (raw) Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the net tree got a conflict in drivers/net/wireless/libertas/scan.c between commit 659c8e5243caf14564155ad8421404f044dd8031 ("libertas: Remove carrier signaling from the scan code") from the wireless-current tree and commit 602114ae595af6c89eab149cf9f939e3f7ef4a34 ("libertas: add access functions for mesh open/connect status") from the net tree. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix for a while. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au diff --cc drivers/net/wireless/libertas/scan.c index b0b1c78,4a0c3e3..0000000 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/scan.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/scan.c @@@ -632,13 -635,16 +632,13 @@@ out2 priv->scan_channel = 0; out: - if (priv->connect_status == LBS_CONNECTED) { - netif_carrier_on(priv->dev); - if (!priv->tx_pending_len) - netif_wake_queue(priv->dev); - } - if (priv->mesh_dev && lbs_mesh_connected(priv)) { - netif_carrier_on(priv->mesh_dev); - if (!priv->tx_pending_len) - netif_wake_queue(priv->mesh_dev); - } + if (priv->connect_status == LBS_CONNECTED && !priv->tx_pending_len) + netif_wake_queue(priv->dev); + - if (priv->mesh_dev && (priv->mesh_connect_status == LBS_CONNECTED) && ++ if (priv->mesh_dev && lbs_mesh_connected(priv) && + !priv->tx_pending_len) + netif_wake_queue(priv->mesh_dev); + kfree(chan_list); lbs_deb_leave_args(LBS_DEB_SCAN, "ret %d", ret);
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>, "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>, Holger Schurig <holgerschurig@googlemail.com> Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the wireless-current tree Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 09:54:32 +1100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20091229095432.f39a887e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> (raw) Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the net tree got a conflict in drivers/net/wireless/libertas/scan.c between commit 659c8e5243caf14564155ad8421404f044dd8031 ("libertas: Remove carrier signaling from the scan code") from the wireless-current tree and commit 602114ae595af6c89eab149cf9f939e3f7ef4a34 ("libertas: add access functions for mesh open/connect status") from the net tree. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix for a while. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au diff --cc drivers/net/wireless/libertas/scan.c index b0b1c78,4a0c3e3..0000000 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/scan.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/scan.c @@@ -632,13 -635,16 +632,13 @@@ out2 priv->scan_channel = 0; out: - if (priv->connect_status == LBS_CONNECTED) { - netif_carrier_on(priv->dev); - if (!priv->tx_pending_len) - netif_wake_queue(priv->dev); - } - if (priv->mesh_dev && lbs_mesh_connected(priv)) { - netif_carrier_on(priv->mesh_dev); - if (!priv->tx_pending_len) - netif_wake_queue(priv->mesh_dev); - } + if (priv->connect_status == LBS_CONNECTED && !priv->tx_pending_len) + netif_wake_queue(priv->dev); + - if (priv->mesh_dev && (priv->mesh_connect_status == LBS_CONNECTED) && ++ if (priv->mesh_dev && lbs_mesh_connected(priv) && + !priv->tx_pending_len) + netif_wake_queue(priv->mesh_dev); + kfree(chan_list); lbs_deb_leave_args(LBS_DEB_SCAN, "ret %d", ret);
next reply other threads:[~2009-12-28 22:54 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2009-12-28 22:54 Stephen Rothwell [this message] 2009-12-28 22:54 ` linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the wireless-current tree Stephen Rothwell 2009-12-28 23:41 ` John W. Linville -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2011-09-27 2:51 Stephen Rothwell 2011-09-27 2:51 ` Stephen Rothwell 2011-09-27 13:09 ` John W. Linville 2011-09-27 14:41 ` wwguy 2011-07-06 2:53 Stephen Rothwell 2011-07-06 2:53 ` Stephen Rothwell 2011-07-06 11:07 ` Gustavo Padovan 2011-06-28 4:02 Stephen Rothwell 2011-06-28 4:02 ` Stephen Rothwell 2011-06-28 14:57 ` Guy, Wey-Yi 2010-12-02 23:45 Stephen Rothwell 2010-12-02 23:45 ` Stephen Rothwell 2010-05-12 2:15 Stephen Rothwell 2010-05-12 2:15 ` Stephen Rothwell 2010-05-12 16:15 ` reinette chatre 2010-05-13 1:02 ` Stephen Rothwell 2010-05-13 1:02 ` Stephen Rothwell 2010-03-30 2:37 Stephen Rothwell 2010-03-30 2:37 ` Stephen Rothwell 2010-03-30 13:12 ` John W. Linville 2010-03-30 13:51 ` Stephen Rothwell 2010-02-15 4:20 Stephen Rothwell 2010-02-15 4:20 ` Stephen Rothwell 2010-02-15 6:22 ` David Miller 2010-02-15 7:16 ` Stephen Rothwell 2010-02-09 2:24 Stephen Rothwell 2010-02-09 2:24 ` Stephen Rothwell 2010-02-09 3:20 ` John W. Linville 2010-01-07 2:12 Stephen Rothwell 2010-01-07 2:12 ` Stephen Rothwell 2010-01-06 2:25 Stephen Rothwell 2010-01-06 2:25 ` Stephen Rothwell 2009-12-01 1:31 Stephen Rothwell 2009-12-01 1:31 ` Stephen Rothwell 2009-12-01 14:06 ` John W. Linville 2009-11-26 3:10 Stephen Rothwell 2009-11-26 3:10 ` Stephen Rothwell 2009-11-26 9:33 ` Johannes Berg 2009-11-26 13:01 ` John W. Linville 2009-11-30 16:48 ` Jean Tourrilhes 2009-07-28 1:59 Stephen Rothwell 2009-07-28 1:53 Stephen Rothwell 2009-07-22 2:00 Stephen Rothwell 2009-07-22 14:03 ` John W. Linville 2009-07-22 1:59 Stephen Rothwell 2009-07-22 2:05 ` Zhu Yi 2009-07-22 4:50 ` Stephen Rothwell 2009-07-22 3:04 ` David Miller 2009-04-30 1:33 Stephen Rothwell 2009-04-30 2:16 ` John W. Linville 2009-04-30 3:23 ` David Miller 2009-04-29 3:51 Stephen Rothwell 2009-04-29 12:42 ` John W. Linville 2009-04-29 13:24 ` Stephen Rothwell 2009-03-24 2:37 Stephen Rothwell 2009-03-06 3:55 Stephen Rothwell 2009-02-19 5:23 Stephen Rothwell 2009-02-19 5:23 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20091229095432.f39a887e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au \ --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \ --cc=davem@davemloft.net \ --cc=holgerschurig@googlemail.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.