From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com>, Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>,
asutoshd@codeaurora.org, nguyenb@codeaurora.org,
hongwus@codeaurora.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@android.com
Cc: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@samsung.com>,
Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] scsi: ufs: Optimize host lock on transfer requests send/compl paths
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 17:18:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200da9c5-ea20-819e-2b11-7f45e8b05cbb@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6d6d296a84f1e62f65fda4d172a85bb35d9a3684.camel@gmail.com>
On 5/31/21 9:04 AM, Bean Huo wrote:
> I did a UFS queue limitation test before, observed that once the
> queue is full, then the active task number in the queue will get
> down. For the Nvme, the scenario is the same. You can refer to the
> slide 23, and slide 24 in the pdf:
> https://elinux.org/images/6/6c/Linux_Storage_System_Bottleneck_Exploration_V0.3.pdf
> I don't know if your patch can fix this issue.
Hi Bean,
That's a very interesting presentation. Unfortunately the overhead for
SCSI in that presentation includes the SCSI core + UFS driver. Given the
use of the host lock in the version of the UFS driver that was used to
prepare that presentation, the overhead introduced by the UFS driver may
be significant. Maybe someone should measure the overhead of the
scsi_debug driver and compare it with the NVMe loopback driver to get a
better idea of how the overhead of these two subsystems compare to each
other?
Bart.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com>, Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>,
asutoshd@codeaurora.org, nguyenb@codeaurora.org,
hongwus@codeaurora.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@android.com
Cc: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@samsung.com>,
Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] scsi: ufs: Optimize host lock on transfer requests send/compl paths
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 17:18:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200da9c5-ea20-819e-2b11-7f45e8b05cbb@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6d6d296a84f1e62f65fda4d172a85bb35d9a3684.camel@gmail.com>
On 5/31/21 9:04 AM, Bean Huo wrote:
> I did a UFS queue limitation test before, observed that once the
> queue is full, then the active task number in the queue will get
> down. For the Nvme, the scenario is the same. You can refer to the
> slide 23, and slide 24 in the pdf:
> https://elinux.org/images/6/6c/Linux_Storage_System_Bottleneck_Exploration_V0.3.pdf
> I don't know if your patch can fix this issue.
Hi Bean,
That's a very interesting presentation. Unfortunately the overhead for
SCSI in that presentation includes the SCSI core + UFS driver. Given the
use of the host lock in the version of the UFS driver that was used to
prepare that presentation, the overhead introduced by the UFS driver may
be significant. Maybe someone should measure the overhead of the
scsi_debug driver and compare it with the NVMe loopback driver to get a
better idea of how the overhead of these two subsystems compare to each
other?
Bart.
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com>, Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>,
asutoshd@codeaurora.org, nguyenb@codeaurora.org,
hongwus@codeaurora.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@android.com
Cc: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@samsung.com>,
Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] scsi: ufs: Optimize host lock on transfer requests send/compl paths
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 17:18:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200da9c5-ea20-819e-2b11-7f45e8b05cbb@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6d6d296a84f1e62f65fda4d172a85bb35d9a3684.camel@gmail.com>
On 5/31/21 9:04 AM, Bean Huo wrote:
> I did a UFS queue limitation test before, observed that once the
> queue is full, then the active task number in the queue will get
> down. For the Nvme, the scenario is the same. You can refer to the
> slide 23, and slide 24 in the pdf:
> https://elinux.org/images/6/6c/Linux_Storage_System_Bottleneck_Exploration_V0.3.pdf
> I don't know if your patch can fix this issue.
Hi Bean,
That's a very interesting presentation. Unfortunately the overhead for
SCSI in that presentation includes the SCSI core + UFS driver. Given the
use of the host lock in the version of the UFS driver that was used to
prepare that presentation, the overhead introduced by the UFS driver may
be significant. Maybe someone should measure the overhead of the
scsi_debug driver and compare it with the NVMe loopback driver to get a
better idea of how the overhead of these two subsystems compare to each
other?
Bart.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-03 0:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-24 8:36 [PATCH v1 0/3] Optimize host lock on TR send/compl paths and utilize UTRLCNR Can Guo
2021-05-24 8:36 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] scsi: ufs: Remove a redundant command completion logic in error handler Can Guo
2021-05-24 16:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-25 4:15 ` Stanley Chu
2021-05-31 7:14 ` Bean Huo
2021-05-24 8:36 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] scsi: ufs: Optimize host lock on transfer requests send/compl paths Can Guo
2021-05-24 8:36 ` Can Guo
2021-05-24 8:36 ` Can Guo
2021-05-24 11:25 ` kernel test robot
2021-05-24 11:25 ` kernel test robot
2021-06-08 17:53 ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-06-08 17:53 ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-06-09 1:01 ` Can Guo
2021-06-09 1:01 ` Can Guo
2021-05-24 20:10 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-24 20:10 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-24 20:10 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-25 1:34 ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2021-05-25 1:34 ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2021-05-25 8:24 ` Avri Altman
2021-05-25 8:24 ` Avri Altman
2021-05-25 8:24 ` Avri Altman
2021-05-28 7:30 ` Avri Altman
2021-05-28 7:30 ` Avri Altman
2021-05-28 7:30 ` Avri Altman
2021-06-02 21:18 ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2021-06-02 21:18 ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2021-05-25 1:40 ` Can Guo
2021-05-25 1:40 ` Can Guo
2021-05-25 16:40 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-25 16:40 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-25 16:40 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-31 16:04 ` Bean Huo
2021-05-31 16:04 ` Bean Huo
2021-05-31 16:04 ` Bean Huo
2021-06-02 2:14 ` Can Guo
2021-06-02 2:14 ` Can Guo
2021-06-03 0:18 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2021-06-03 0:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-03 0:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-03 2:54 ` Stanley Chu
2021-06-03 2:54 ` Stanley Chu
2021-06-03 2:54 ` Stanley Chu
2021-06-04 1:49 ` Can Guo
2021-06-04 1:49 ` Can Guo
2021-06-17 2:49 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-17 2:49 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-17 2:49 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-23 2:04 ` Can Guo
2021-06-23 2:04 ` Can Guo
2021-06-28 22:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-28 22:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-28 22:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-29 5:41 ` Can Guo
2021-06-29 5:41 ` Can Guo
2021-07-01 15:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-07-01 15:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-07-01 15:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-24 8:36 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] scsi: ufs: Utilize Transfer Request List Completion Notification Register Can Guo
2021-05-24 8:36 ` Can Guo
2021-05-24 8:36 ` Can Guo
2021-05-31 16:05 ` Bean Huo
2021-05-31 16:05 ` Bean Huo
2021-05-31 16:05 ` Bean Huo
2021-06-03 2:54 ` Stanley Chu
2021-06-03 2:54 ` Stanley Chu
2021-06-03 2:54 ` Stanley Chu
2021-06-16 3:48 ` [PATCH v1 0/3] Optimize host lock on TR send/compl paths and utilize UTRLCNR Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200da9c5-ea20-819e-2b11-7f45e8b05cbb@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=hongwus@codeaurora.org \
--cc=huobean@gmail.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kwmad.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=nguyenb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=satyat@google.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.