* [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 @ 2009-09-29 21:48 bugzilla-daemon 2009-10-04 20:47 ` [Bug 14256] " bugzilla-daemon ` (49 more replies) 0 siblings, 50 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-09-29 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 Summary: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 Product: File System Version: 2.5 Kernel Version: 2.6.31 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Tree: Mainline Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: ext3 AssignedTo: fs_ext3@kernel-bugs.osdl.org ReportedBy: rjw@sisk.pl Blocks: 13615 Regression: Yes Subject : [2.6.31] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125351816109264&w=4 This entry is being used for tracking a regression from 2.6.30. Please don't close it until the problem is fixed in the mainline. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-10-04 20:47 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-10-09 22:01 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (48 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-10-04 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #1 from Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> 2009-10-04 20:47:41 --- On Sunday 04 October 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14256 > > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 > > Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> > > Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (11 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125351816109264&w=3D4 > > The exact same bug (same cause, same symptom) just hit me again in 2.6.32-rc1. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon 2009-10-04 20:47 ` [Bug 14256] " bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-10-09 22:01 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-10-10 1:31 ` Theodore Tso 2009-10-10 1:31 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (47 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 1 reply; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-10-09 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #2 from Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> 2009-10-09 22:01:43 --- On Friday 09 October 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > Mikael Pettersson writes: > > Rafael J. Wysocki writes: > > > On Sunday 04 October 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > > > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > > > > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should > > > > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14256 > > > > > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 > > > > > Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> > > > > > Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (11 days old) > > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125351816109264&w=3D4 > > > > > > > > The exact same bug (same cause, same symptom) just hit me again in 2.6.32-rc1. > > > > > > Thanks for the update. > > > > > > Could you check the current Linus' tree, please? There are some known > > > regression fixes in there. > > > > I tried simplified versions of the bug trigger on two machines > > running 2.6.32-rc1-git6, and neither triggered the kernel bug. > > > > The original recipe involved doing a glibc rebuild, run its test > > suite, install it, and reboot. Today however machine 1 was already > > doing a rebuild so after the rebuild it did a reboot into the new > > kernel before the install. The second machine booted the new kernel > > directly to install the binary packages from the first machine. > > > > I'll re-run the full bug trigger recipe on a third machine later next > > week (it must rebuild glibc itself anyway due to arch differences). > > Not fixed in 2.6.32-rc3. A glibc rebuild + install triggered the > exact same bug on the third machine. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-10-09 22:01 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-10-10 1:31 ` Theodore Tso 2009-10-12 13:48 ` Mikael Pettersson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 71+ messages in thread From: Theodore Tso @ 2009-10-10 1:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mikael Pettersson; +Cc: linux-ext4, bugzilla-daemon On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 10:01:44PM +0000, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > > Not fixed in 2.6.32-rc3. A glibc rebuild + install triggered the > > exact same bug on the third machine. Can you isolate this down to something simpler? Will "make install" followed by a reboot be sufficient to replicate the assertion failure? If it does, will copying in a new version of libc.so.6 and then rebooting be enough to trigger the assert failure? Thanks, - Ted ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-10-10 1:31 ` Theodore Tso @ 2009-10-12 13:48 ` Mikael Pettersson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: Mikael Pettersson @ 2009-10-12 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Theodore Tso; +Cc: Mikael Pettersson, linux-ext4, bugzilla-daemon Theodore Tso writes: > On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 10:01:44PM +0000, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > > > Not fixed in 2.6.32-rc3. A glibc rebuild + install triggered the > > > exact same bug on the third machine. > > Can you isolate this down to something simpler? Will "make install" > followed by a reboot be sufficient to replicate the assertion failure? I've done repeated glibc downgrades and upgrades, using pre-built binary packages, followed by reboots, but they have so far not triggered the bug. My guess is that something in the build process or the test suite run triggers the bug. FWIW, the systems are rpm-based derived from Fedora, so the rebuilds are just "rpmbuild --rebuild glibc-<version>.src.rpm", and the installs are "rpm -Uvh" on the binary rpms, with --force if I'm doing a downgrade. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon 2009-10-04 20:47 ` [Bug 14256] " bugzilla-daemon 2009-10-09 22:01 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-10-10 1:31 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-10-12 13:48 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (46 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-10-10 1:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #3 from Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> 2009-10-10 01:31:41 --- On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 10:01:44PM +0000, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > > Not fixed in 2.6.32-rc3. A glibc rebuild + install triggered the > > exact same bug on the third machine. Can you isolate this down to something simpler? Will "make install" followed by a reboot be sufficient to replicate the assertion failure? If it does, will copying in a new version of libc.so.6 and then rebooting be enough to trigger the assert failure? Thanks, - Ted -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2009-10-10 1:31 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-10-12 13:48 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-10-12 16:19 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (45 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-10-12 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> 2009-10-12 13:48:39 --- Theodore Tso writes: > On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 10:01:44PM +0000, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > > > Not fixed in 2.6.32-rc3. A glibc rebuild + install triggered the > > > exact same bug on the third machine. > > Can you isolate this down to something simpler? Will "make install" > followed by a reboot be sufficient to replicate the assertion failure? I've done repeated glibc downgrades and upgrades, using pre-built binary packages, followed by reboots, but they have so far not triggered the bug. My guess is that something in the build process or the test suite run triggers the bug. FWIW, the systems are rpm-based derived from Fedora, so the rebuilds are just "rpmbuild --rebuild glibc-<version>.src.rpm", and the installs are "rpm -Uvh" on the binary rpms, with --force if I'm doing a downgrade. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2009-10-12 13:48 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-10-12 16:19 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-11-05 16:07 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (44 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-10-12 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sandeen@redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> 2009-10-12 16:19:54 --- I can give this a whirl on fedora. Just to try to reproduce more exactly, which version of the glibc rpm package are you rebuilding? I'm also curious, does simply rebuilding the package and rebooting lead to the same issue (w/o installing the result?) Do you have rpm configured in any unique way or is the build happening in all the normal/standard places? So you have /tmp as ext3 as a separate fs, any other interesting fs config? Thanks, -Eric -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2009-10-12 16:19 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-11-05 16:07 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-11-05 16:13 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (43 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-11-05 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jack@suse.cz --- Comment #6 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2009-11-05 16:07:31 --- Eric, have you succeeded in reproducing this? What seems to happen is that while we are in ext3_put_super(), there are still some inode references held and therefore the inodes (regular files) don't get deleted and we complain about them in ext3_put_super. The question is who holds the reference... I did a quick audit of the code and couldn't find iget() unmatched with iput() or a similar problem. I guess I can create a debugging patch which might be able to show us who holds the reference. Will try to code it next week. Mikael, will you be able to run such debugging patch? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (5 preceding siblings ...) 2009-11-05 16:07 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-11-05 16:13 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-11-11 15:27 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (42 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-11-05 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #7 from Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> 2009-11-05 16:13:15 --- Jan, nope haven't, to be honest fell off my radar as I was looking at that ext4 corruption. I've not tried to reproduce it yet. Sorry, -Eric -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (6 preceding siblings ...) 2009-11-05 16:13 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-11-11 15:27 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-11-11 15:29 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (41 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-11-11 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #8 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2009-11-11 15:27:53 --- Created an attachment (id=23749) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=23749) Patch reporting lost inode references This patch reports more information about inodes left in orphan list. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (7 preceding siblings ...) 2009-11-11 15:27 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-11-11 15:29 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-11-20 15:11 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (40 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-11-11 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #9 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2009-11-11 15:29:18 --- Mikael, could you please run a kernel with the above patch and post here resulting messages during umount and also attach here your System.map file from the tested kernel? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (8 preceding siblings ...) 2009-11-11 15:29 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-11-20 15:11 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-11-21 14:27 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (39 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-11-20 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tytso@mit.edu --- Comment #10 from Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> 2009-11-20 15:11:21 --- Hi Mikael, Have you had a chance to try running a kernel with Jan's debugging patch? Is this a problem you can reproduce reliably, or was it a one-off? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (9 preceding siblings ...) 2009-11-20 15:11 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-11-21 14:27 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-12-08 11:12 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (38 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-11-21 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #11 from Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> 2009-11-21 14:27:39 --- On Saturday 21 November 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14256 > > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 > > Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> > > Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (57 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125351816109264&w=3D4 > > Still occurs with kernel 2.6.32-rc8. > > This time I only rebuilt the glibc src rpm, which also runs its > test suite, but I did not install the new glibc binaries before > the shutdown -r. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (10 preceding siblings ...) 2009-11-21 14:27 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-12-08 11:12 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-12-08 11:47 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (37 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-12-08 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mikpe@it.uu.se --- Comment #12 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2009-12-08 11:12:19 --- Ah, I've noticed that Mikael was not on CC of this bug so he didn't see my messages. Mikael, could you please try running the debugging patch from comment #8/#9? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (11 preceding siblings ...) 2009-12-08 11:12 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-12-08 11:47 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-12-14 12:40 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (36 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-12-08 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #13 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> 2009-12-08 11:47:41 --- (In reply to comment #12) > Ah, I've noticed that Mikael was not on CC of this bug so he didn't see my > messages. Mikael, could you please try running the debugging patch from comment > #8/#9? Thanks. I'll test the debug patch this weekend, right now I'm away from the machines that trigger the problem. (Since I issued all my bug reports on LKML it never occurred to me to add a cc: to myself in this bugzilla entry. Sorry about that.) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (12 preceding siblings ...) 2009-12-08 11:47 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-12-14 12:40 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-12-14 14:46 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (35 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-12-14 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #14 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> 2009-12-14 12:40:25 --- With Jan Kara'a debugging patch on top of 2.6.32 final I get the following after shutdown -r: Unmounting file systems: sb orphan head is 22 sb_info orphan list: inode sda2:22 at cc7c1618: mode 100600, nlink 0, next 13, i_count=2501 dentry= NULL iget IPs: c009e590, c009dd08, inode sda2:13 at d1d932b8: mode 100600, nlink 0, next 12, i_count=2 dentry= NULL iget IPs: c009e590, c009dd08, inode sda2:12 at d1de0618: mode 100600, nlink 0, next 0, i_count=1 dentry= NULL iget IPs: c009e590, c009dd08, kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:450! c009e590 is fs/fs-writeback.c:writeback_inodes_wb(), line 681. c009dd08 is fs/fs-writeback.c:wait_sb_inodes(), line 1170. I get this with both gcc-4.3.4 and gcc-4.4.2 compiled kernels. On a second machine I got a similar result, except the three inodes had only one iget IP recorded, and it was the one in writeback_inodes_wb(). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (13 preceding siblings ...) 2009-12-14 12:40 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-12-14 14:46 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-12-15 9:08 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (34 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-12-14 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |axboe@kernel.dk --- Comment #15 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2009-12-14 14:46:07 --- Thanks for the debugging. So the problematic files were regular files that lead pretty simple life - no references from unexpected places or so. What catches my eye is that inode numbers are surprisingly small (22, 12, 13; in your original report 17, 15). Since normal inode numbers start by 11 and that is usually taken by lost+found, numbers 12 and 13 are as small as they can get. I suppose this is a filesystem dedicated for the build, isn't it? And the files making problems are created as a first files on that filesystem in its root directory. Any idea what those files are? Another thing: i_count=2501 for inode 22 is absurdly high. We'd have to leak references really heavily for that file. I've checked the code in writeback_inodes_wb() and wait_sb_inodes() but reference counting there looks fine. So I have no clue what's going on right now. Anyway, adding Jens to CC just in case it rings a bell to him. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (14 preceding siblings ...) 2009-12-14 14:46 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-12-15 9:08 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-12-29 13:18 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (33 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-12-15 9:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #16 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> 2009-12-15 09:08:45 --- The affected file system is /tmp. There's nothing special about it, except it being separate from / and /home. The builds are plain "rpmbuild --rebuild" so they do most accesses under /usr/src/ and /var/tmp/, both on /, but the glibc test suite will create temporary files on /tmp. I have no idea what those files are. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (15 preceding siblings ...) 2009-12-15 9:08 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-12-29 13:18 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-11 21:59 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (32 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-12-29 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 carlos.velasco@nimastelecom.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |carlos.velasco@nimastelecom | |.com --- Comment #17 from carlos.velasco@nimastelecom.com 2009-12-29 13:18:03 --- I have reproduced the exact same problem in a new LFS system using 2.6.32.2 kernel. The bug is definitely triggered but issuing a "make check" of eglibc before a reboot. You do not need to install it or just build it, whatever triggers this bug is related to something that eglibc makes during tests. --- brw-rw---- 1 root disk 253, 3 Dec 29 2009 /dev/dm-3 brw------- 1 root root 253, 3 Dec 29 2009 LV0-tmp Unmounting all other currently mounted file systems... /etc/rc.d/rc6.d/S70mountfs: line 18: 22979 Segmentation fault umount -a -d -r > /dev/null [ FAIL ] [ 903.074244] sb orphan head is 13 [ 903.088507] sb_info orphan list: [ 903.102590] inode dm-3:13 at ffff880114948a10: mode 100600, nlink 0, next 12 [ 903.131992] inode dm-3:12 at ffff880114907340: mode 100600, nlink 0, next 0 [ 903.149056] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 903.149057] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435! [ 903.149058] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP [ 903.149060] last sysfs file: /sys/class/net/bonding_masters [ 903.149061] CPU 2 [ 903.149062] Modules linked in: bonding ipv6 bnx2 usbhid button hpilo [ 903.149067] Pid: 22979, comm: umount Not tainted 2.6.32.2 #1 ProLiant DL360 G6 [ 903.149068] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8117d883>] [<ffffffff8117d883>] ext3_put_super+0x233/0x280 [ 903.149075] RSP: 0018:ffff88011cd6be28 EFLAGS: 00010202 [ 903.149076] RAX: ffff8801149489c8 RBX: ffff88011d857e00 RCX: ffffffff815e0800 [ 903.149077] RDX: 00000000007f3f13 RSI: 0000000000000046 RDI: ffffffff816dc130 [ 903.149078] RBP: ffff88011cd6be58 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001 [ 903.149080] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 000000000e200000 R12: ffff88011d3db400 [ 903.149081] R13: ffff88011d857f98 R14: ffff88011d857f98 R15: ffff88011d0cc060 [ 903.149083] FS: 00007f9f88456730(0000) GS:ffff88002c040000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 903.149084] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b [ 903.149086] CR2: 00007f9f8845c000 CR3: 000000011dc84000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [ 903.149087] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 903.149088] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 903.149090] Process umount (pid: 22979, threadinfo ffff88011cd6a000, task ffff88011d0cc060) [ 903.149091] Stack: [ 903.149092] ffff880100000000 ffff88011d3db400 ffff88011d3db400 ffffffff814a4ac0 [ 903.149094] <0> ffffffff8163d1b8 ffff88011d3db400 ffff88011cd6be78 ffffffff810f6cc1 [ 903.149096] <0> ffff88011f29de40 0000000000000003 ffff88011cd6be98 ffffffff810f6d8c [ 903.149098] Call Trace: [ 903.149104] [<ffffffff810f6cc1>] generic_shutdown_super+0x51/0xf0 [ 903.149106] [<ffffffff810f6d8c>] kill_block_super+0x2c/0x50 [ 903.149109] [<ffffffff810f81ea>] deactivate_super+0x6a/0xf0 [ 903.149112] [<ffffffff81113d6e>] mntput_no_expire+0x9e/0xf0 [ 903.149114] [<ffffffff8111518e>] sys_umount+0x5e/0x460 [ 903.149117] [<ffffffff8100baeb>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 903.149118] Code: c7 b1 de 54 81 31 c0 e8 3c 4d 30 00 4c 8b b3 98 01 00 00 49 8b 06 4d 39 f5 0f 18 08 75 11 4c 3b ab 98 01 00 00 0f 84 c4 fe ff ff <0f> 0b eb fe 49 8d 46 80 49 8d 4e 48 48 8b b0 c8 01 00 00 44 8b [ 903.149131] RIP [<ffffffff8117d883>] ext3_put_super+0x233/0x280 [ 903.149134] RSP <ffff88011cd6be28> [ 903.159165] ---[ end trace 3ed92bd591190341 ]--- [ 903.159166] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 903.159169] WARNING: at kernel/exit.c:895 do_exit+0x94a/0x9e0() [ 903.159170] Hardware name: ProLiant DL360 G6 [ 903.159171] Modules linked in: bonding ipv6 bnx2 usbhid button hpilo [ 903.159175] Pid: 22979, comm: umount Tainted: G D 2.6.32.2 #1 [ 903.159176] Call Trace: [ 903.159179] [<ffffffff8104c218>] warn_slowpath_common+0x78/0xf0 [ 903.159181] [<ffffffff8104c29f>] warn_slowpath_null+0xf/0x20 [ 903.159183] [<ffffffff81050fca>] do_exit+0x94a/0x9e0 [ 903.159187] [<ffffffff8106de01>] ? down_trylock+0x31/0x50 [ 903.159190] [<ffffffff81010305>] oops_end+0x75/0xa0 [ 903.159192] [<ffffffff810108a1>] die+0xd1/0x110 [ 903.159194] [<ffffffff8100d0d4>] do_trap+0xc4/0x170 [ 903.159196] [<ffffffff8100d580>] do_invalid_op+0x90/0xb0 [ 903.159198] [<ffffffff8117d883>] ? ext3_put_super+0x233/0x280 [ 903.159200] [<ffffffff8100c815>] invalid_op+0x15/0x20 [ 903.159203] [<ffffffff8117d883>] ? ext3_put_super+0x233/0x280 [ 903.159205] [<ffffffff8117d8c7>] ? ext3_put_super+0x277/0x280 [ 903.159207] [<ffffffff810f6cc1>] generic_shutdown_super+0x51/0xf0 [ 903.159209] [<ffffffff810f6d8c>] kill_block_super+0x2c/0x50 [ 903.159211] [<ffffffff810f81ea>] deactivate_super+0x6a/0xf0 [ 903.159213] [<ffffffff81113d6e>] mntput_no_expire+0x9e/0xf0 [ 903.159215] [<ffffffff8111518e>] sys_umount+0x5e/0x460 [ 903.159217] [<ffffffff8100baeb>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 903.159218] ---[ end trace 3ed92bd591190342 ]--- -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (16 preceding siblings ...) 2009-12-29 13:18 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-11 21:59 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-11 22:55 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (31 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-11 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #18 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2010-01-11 21:59:30 --- Guys, I'm having problems reproducing this. I've checked out 2.10 version of eglibc but when I run "make check" I get error on: GCONV_PATH=/local/test1/build/iconvdata LC_ALL=C LOCPATH=/local/test1/build/localedata /local/test1/build/elf/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 --library-path /local/test1/build:/local/test1/build/math:/local/test1/build/elf:/local/test1/build/dlfcn:/local/test1/build/nss:/local/test1/build/nis:/local/test1/build/rt:/local/test1/build/resolv:/local/test1/build/crypt:/local/test1/build/nptl /local/test1/build/localedata/tst_mblen probably because of: mblen:de_DE.ISO-8859-1:1:1:2:F:the return value is different from an expected value When I configure the package without TLS, I cannot get even that far... So could you either provide me with a simpler reproduction case or tell me how to make "make check" do what I need? Thanks... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (17 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-11 21:59 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-11 22:55 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-12 16:03 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (30 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-11 22:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #19 from carlos.velasco@nimastelecom.com 2010-01-11 22:55:40 --- Jan, You usually run glibc checks with -k (some errors are usual and recurring): make -k check You can follow CLFS/LFS guideline here using the pre-downloaded version of eglibc and patches: http://cross-lfs.org/view/svn/x86_64/final-system/eglibc-64bit.html Regards, Carlos Velasco -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (18 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-11 22:55 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-12 16:03 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-12 17:30 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (29 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-12 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #20 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2010-01-12 16:03:29 --- OK, now "make -k check" have been doing something for a reasonable time but I don't see problems with orphan files you see. Only at the end there are a few ld-linux-... processes hanging so that I cannot umount the filesystem (I have to kill them to umount the filesystem) - do you also observe such processes? Also if you can still reproduce the problem - could you please find which test does exactly cause the problem so that I can concentrate on it? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (19 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-12 16:03 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-12 17:30 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-12 20:12 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (28 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-12 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #21 from carlos.velasco@nimastelecom.com 2010-01-12 17:30:52 --- I don't see any ld-linux process after make -k check bash-4.0# ps -ef | grep -i ld-linux root 13640 18376 0 18:27 ? 00:00:00 grep -i ld-linux bash-4.0# umount /tmp [435397.580983] sb orphan head is 14 [435397.595803] sb_info orphan list: [435397.611165] inode dm-3:14 at ffff8800c7880d28: mode 100600, nlink 0, next 13 [435397.639671] inode dm-3:13 at ffff8800df2566e0: mode 100600, nlink 0, next 12 [435397.672072] inode dm-3:12 at ffff8800df2560b0: mode 100600, nlink 0, next 0 bash-4.0# [435397.672080] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [435397.672082] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435! [435397.672083] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP [435397.672085] last sysfs file: /sys/class/net/bonding_masters [435397.672086] CPU 2 [435397.672087] Modules linked in: bonding ipv6 usbhid bnx2 hpilo button [435397.672092] Pid: 13641, comm: umount Not tainted 2.6.32.3 #1 ProLiant DL360 G6 [435397.672093] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8117da53>] [<ffffffff8117da53>] ext3_put_super+0x233/0x280 [435397.672099] RSP: 0018:ffff88011cda5e28 EFLAGS: 00010206 [435397.672101] RAX: ffff8800c7880ce0 RBX: ffff88011cd54e00 RCX: 000000000001055f [435397.672102] RDX: 0000000000004646 RSI: 0000000000000082 RDI: ffffffff815e6330 [435397.672104] RBP: ffff88011cda5e58 R08: 000000000001055e R09: ffffffff816dd240 [435397.672105] R10: 0000000000000013 R11: ffffffff816dd240 R12: ffff88011d13b400 [435397.672106] R13: ffff88011cd54f98 R14: ffff88011cd54f98 R15: ffff88011d3e1350 [435397.672108] FS: 00007f910e82b730(0000) GS:ffff88002c040000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [435397.672110] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b [435397.672111] CR2: 00007f910dedb32e CR3: 000000011cf65000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [435397.672112] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [435397.672114] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [435397.672116] Process umount (pid: 13641, threadinfo ffff88011cda4000, task ffff88011d3e1350) [435397.672117] Stack: [435397.672118] ffff880100000000 ffff88011d13b400 ffff88011d13b400 ffffffff814a4ac0 [435397.672120] <0> ffffffff8163d1b8 ffff88011d13b400 ffff88011cda5e78 ffffffff810f6cd1 [435397.672121] <0> ffff88011f016180 0000000000000003 ffff88011cda5e98 ffffffff810f6d9c [435397.672124] Call Trace: [435397.672130] [<ffffffff810f6cd1>] generic_shutdown_super+0x51/0xf0 [435397.672132] [<ffffffff810f6d9c>] kill_block_super+0x2c/0x50 [435397.672134] [<ffffffff810f81fa>] deactivate_super+0x6a/0xf0 [435397.672137] [<ffffffff81113dce>] mntput_no_expire+0x9e/0xf0 [435397.672140] [<ffffffff811151ee>] sys_umount+0x5e/0x460 [435397.672143] [<ffffffff8100baeb>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [435397.672144] Code: c7 41 df 54 81 31 c0 e8 b7 52 30 00 4c 8b b3 98 01 00 00 49 8b 06 4d 39 f5 0f 18 08 75 11 4c 3b ab 98 01 00 00 0f 84 c4 fe ff ff <0f> 0b eb fe 49 8d 46 80 49 8d 4e 48 48 8b b0 c8 01 00 00 44 8b [435397.672158] RIP [<ffffffff8117da53>] ext3_put_super+0x233/0x280 [435397.672160] RSP <ffff88011cda5e28> [435397.682079] ---[ end trace 7a92197c0643be5c ]--- [435397.682080] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [435397.682083] WARNING: at kernel/exit.c:895 do_exit+0x94a/0x9e0() [435397.682084] Hardware name: ProLiant DL360 G6 [435397.682085] Modules linked in: bonding ipv6 usbhid bnx2 hpilo button [435397.682088] Pid: 13641, comm: umount Tainted: G D 2.6.32.3 #1 [435397.682090] Call Trace: [435397.682093] [<ffffffff8104c208>] warn_slowpath_common+0x78/0xf0 [435397.682095] [<ffffffff8104c28f>] warn_slowpath_null+0xf/0x20 [435397.682097] [<ffffffff81050fba>] do_exit+0x94a/0x9e0 [435397.682100] [<ffffffff8106ddf1>] ? down_trylock+0x31/0x50 [435397.682104] [<ffffffff81010305>] oops_end+0x75/0xa0 [435397.682106] [<ffffffff810108a1>] die+0xd1/0x110 [435397.682108] [<ffffffff8100d0d4>] do_trap+0xc4/0x170 [435397.682110] [<ffffffff8100d580>] do_invalid_op+0x90/0xb0 [435397.682112] [<ffffffff8117da53>] ? ext3_put_super+0x233/0x280 [435397.682114] [<ffffffff8106ddf1>] ? down_trylock+0x31/0x50 [435397.682117] [<ffffffff8100c815>] invalid_op+0x15/0x20 [435397.682119] [<ffffffff8117da53>] ? ext3_put_super+0x233/0x280 [435397.682121] [<ffffffff8117da97>] ? ext3_put_super+0x277/0x280 [435397.682123] [<ffffffff810f6cd1>] generic_shutdown_super+0x51/0xf0 [435397.682126] [<ffffffff810f6d9c>] kill_block_super+0x2c/0x50 [435397.682128] [<ffffffff810f81fa>] deactivate_super+0x6a/0xf0 [435397.682130] [<ffffffff81113dce>] mntput_no_expire+0x9e/0xf0 [435397.682132] [<ffffffff811151ee>] sys_umount+0x5e/0x460 [435397.682134] [<ffffffff8100baeb>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [435397.682135] ---[ end trace 7a92197c0643be5d ]--- There are many many tests, difficult finding which one. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (20 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-12 17:30 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-12 20:12 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-12 23:25 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (27 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-12 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #22 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2010-01-12 20:12:39 --- Hmm, strange. I've now downloaded eglibc 2.10.1 from the site you pointed to and followed instructions there. Now I don't have any ld-linux hung processes and everything seems to finish fine but still no luck in reproducing the problem. About finding which test is causing this: I suppose you could easily disable tests from different directories and the when you find in which directory the problematic test is, you could do a binary search on tests. But I understand it's quite a bit of work... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (21 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-12 20:12 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-12 23:25 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-13 0:34 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (26 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-12 23:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #23 from carlos.velasco@nimastelecom.com 2010-01-12 23:25:48 --- It is something in the nptl (threads) subdir tests. eglibc-build/nptl# make subdir=nptl -C ../../eglibc-2.10.1/nptl objdir=/compile/eglibc-build tests ... eglibc-build/nptl# umount /tmp Segmentation fault Not sure about how to isolate the exact test from here now... will try to do my best. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (22 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-12 23:25 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-13 0:34 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-18 22:41 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (25 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-13 0:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #24 from carlos.velasco@nimastelecom.com 2010-01-13 00:34:00 --- Found. It is the test "tst-mutexpi9". eglibc-2.10.1/nptl# GCONV_PATH=/compile/eglibc-build/iconvdata LC_ALL=C /compile/eglibc-build/elf/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 --library-path /compile/eglibc-build:/compile/eglibc-build/math:/compile/eglibc-build/elf:/compile/eglibc-build/dlfcn:/compile/eglibc-build/nss:/compile/eglibc-build/nis:/compile/eglibc-build/rt:/compile/eglibc-build/resolv:/compile/eglibc-build/crypt:/compile/eglibc-build/nptl /compile/eglibc-build/nptl/tst-mutexpi9 > /compile/eglibc-build/nptl/tst-mutexpi9.out eglibc-2.10.1/nptl# umount /tmp Segmentation fault eglibc-2.10.1/nptl# cat /compile/eglibc-build/nptl/tst-mutexpi9.out going to fork now -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (23 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-13 0:34 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-18 22:41 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-19 19:56 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (24 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-18 22:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #25 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2010-01-18 22:41:46 --- Whohoo, reproduced! The trick was that this test is creating files in /tmp and I was doing all the compilation (and unmounting) in a different partition than /tmp is. Thanks for identifying the test case. For others interested: What the test does is: It creates a temporary file, mmaps it, deletes it, creates pthread mutex in the mmap, forks, does some mutex locking, exits. During this process we apparently leak an inode reference, yay. What is interesting is that when the mutex is created without priority inheritance logic, everything works fine so there's something racy about our pthread mutex handling in the kernel. I'll now go and debug it more, I just wanted to share the news. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (24 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-18 22:41 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-19 19:56 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-19 19:57 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (23 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-19 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dvhltc@us.ibm.com --- Comment #26 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2010-01-19 19:56:41 --- OK, I've spent some time looking into this. It's definitely a futex problem - futexes take reference to inode and apparently this test case takes some code path where we don't drop all the inode references we have acquired. I've tried to find that place by looking into the code but wasn't successful. I think the problem is caused by futex rewrite that happened between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31 so I'm adding Darren to CC (who was author of most of the patches). Darren, I'm able to reproduce the problem with 2.6.33-rc3 kernel so apparently the problem isn't fixed yet. I'll attach here a minimal test program that triggers the problem. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (25 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-19 19:56 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-19 19:57 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-19 23:24 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (22 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-19 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #27 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2010-01-19 19:57:25 --- Created an attachment (id=24639) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=24639) Test program causing lost inode references -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (26 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-19 19:57 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-19 23:24 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-20 10:40 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (21 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-19 23:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #28 from Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com> 2010-01-19 23:24:41 --- >From the following in the test: mem = mmap (NULL, ps, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0); this may be related to be the problem reported by Kosaki and fixed with his patch recently pulled into tip by Ingo and sent Linus and stable. Can you try with this patch from tip/core-fixes-for-linus? commit 7485d0d3758e8e6491a5c9468114e74dc050785d Author: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Tue Jan 5 16:32:43 2010 +0900 futexes: Remove rw parameter from get_futex_key() Currently, futexes have two problem: A) The current futex code doesn't handle private file mappings properly. get_futex_key() uses PageAnon() to distinguish file and anon, which can cause the following bad scenario: 1) thread-A call futex(private-mapping, FUTEX_WAIT), it sleeps on file mapping object. 2) thread-B writes a variable and it makes it cow. 3) thread-B calls futex(private-mapping, FUTEX_WAKE), it wakes up blocked thread on the anonymous page. (but it's nothing) B) Current futex code doesn't handle zero page properly. Read mode get_user_pages() can return zero page, but current futex code doesn't handle it at all. Then, zero page makes infinite loop internally. The solution is to use write mode get_user_page() always for page lookup. It prevents the lookup of both file page of private mappings and zero page. Performance concerns: Probaly very little, because glibc always initialize variables for futex before to call futex(). It means glibc users never see the overhead of this patch. Compatibility concerns: This patch has few compatibility issues. After this patch, FUTEX_WAIT require writable access to futex variables (read-only mappings makes EFAULT). But practically it's not a problem, glibc always initalizes variables for futexes explicitly - nobody uses read-only mappings. Reported-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@gmail.com> LKML-Reference: <20100105162633.45A2.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (27 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-19 23:24 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-20 10:40 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-20 13:52 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (20 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-20 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #29 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2010-01-20 10:40:30 --- I've tested a kernel I've pulled today from Linus (which has the above commit) and it still has the issue. Note that the mapping created is shared so it's unlikely that the above patch would really fix it... BTW: The problem is 100% reproducible for me (and for the guys reporting it as well) so I believe that you should see it as well with the test program. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (28 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-20 10:40 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-20 13:52 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-20 18:11 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (19 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-20 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #30 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> 2010-01-20 13:52:46 --- Using the standalone test case I can reproduce the bug with all kernels back to 2.6.29, but not with 2.6.28. I'm trying a bisect now. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (29 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-20 13:52 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-20 18:11 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-20 19:10 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (18 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-20 18:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #31 from Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com> 2010-01-20 18:11:16 --- Jan, I apologize, I missed the shared mapping. I wouldn't expect Kosaki's patch to fix this. Have you experimented with the SHARED, RECURSIVE, and PRIO_INHERIT flags of the mutexattr to see if this is the only configuration in which you see the problem? Understanding which of these flags are required to reproduce would help point at where to look in the code. Right now I suspect a futex key reference imbalance in the futex_lock_pi() code path. 2.6.29 includes changes from me on fault handling as well as key reference imbalance fixes in this area. Mikael, please let me know what your git bisection reveals. I'm trying to make time to do some testing/analysis myself, but I'm being kept very busy on other pressing issues right now, so I may not be able to respond as quickly as I'd like. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (30 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-20 18:11 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-20 19:10 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-20 19:29 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (17 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-20 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #32 from Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com> 2010-01-20 19:10:25 --- I see above that PRIO_INHERIT is required, and the test depends on SHARED. I suppose we could try with pthreads instead of fork to see if it's related to SHARED. For now I'll start examining the futex_lock_pi() path - particular around the signal induced wakeup. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (31 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-20 19:10 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-20 19:29 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-20 19:54 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (16 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-20 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #33 from Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com> 2010-01-20 19:29:53 --- Took a look at the 2.6.29 code, I believe it is possible to have an inode reference imbalance when a fault is taken. Unfortunately, both queue_lock() and get_futex_key() acquire references to the inode (I'd like to do away with queue_lock() as it masks reference usage and generally complicates the corner-case-heavy futex code). In the fault path queue_unlock() will release the first inode reference, but if on the first attempt (attempt == 0) the get_user() fails, we'll simply return without dropping the second reference. Some instrumentation could confirm this. I'll take a look at later sources which should have a significantly different fault path. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (32 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-20 19:29 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-20 19:54 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-20 20:09 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (15 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-20 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #34 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> 2010-01-20 19:54:37 --- My bisection has identified the following as the culprit: commit 38d47c1b7075bd7ec3881141bb3629da58f88dab Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Date: Fri Sep 26 19:32:20 2008 +0200 futex: rely on get_user_pages() for shared futexes On the way of getting rid of the mmap_sem requirement for shared futexes, start by relying on get_user_pages(). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (33 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-20 19:54 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-20 20:09 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-23 22:18 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (14 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-20 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #35 from Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com> 2010-01-20 20:09:08 --- The fault path inode count problem appears to be fixed in 2.6.33-rc3 where the fault logic is rewritten and and we properly account for both references taken by queue_lock as well as get_futex_key(). Since Jan in comment #26 said he can reproduce on 2.6.33-rc3, this isn't likely to be the path that caused the problem. I'll continue to look. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (34 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-20 20:09 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-23 22:18 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-24 11:28 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (13 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-23 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #36 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> 2010-01-23 22:18:38 --- I've posted a futex bug fix to lkml: <http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126428261230399&w=2> It fixed the standalone test case. I'm now doing a full glibc rebuild and test suite run on a machine with the fixed kernel. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (35 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-23 22:18 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-24 11:28 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-24 17:13 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (12 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-24 11:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #37 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> 2010-01-24 11:28:05 --- (In reply to comment #36) > I've posted a futex bug fix to lkml: > <http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126428261230399&w=2> > > It fixed the standalone test case. I'm now doing a full glibc rebuild and test > suite run on a machine with the fixed kernel. Completed. The patch eliminated all orphan inodes from the glibc test suite. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (36 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-24 11:28 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-24 17:13 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-24 18:17 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (11 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-24 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #38 from carlos.velasco@nimastelecom.com 2010-01-24 17:13:44 --- It works for me. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (37 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-24 17:13 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-24 18:17 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-24 18:20 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (10 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-24 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #39 from carlos.velasco@nimastelecom.com 2010-01-24 18:17:58 --- Not sure about the patch. With patch applied, after testing and installing glibc I see plenty of tmp files left in /tmp: -rw------- 1 root root 0 Jan 24 18:56 tst-atime.HiK5Qd -rw------- 1 root root 0 Jan 24 19:07 cc2mcjSe.o -rw------- 1 root root 0 Jan 24 19:07 cc3s3qwc.c -rw------- 1 root root 9766 Jan 24 19:07 ccNVp9dh.ld -rw------- 1 root root 0 Jan 24 19:07 cckbLeAj.le I don't remember to see them without patch applied. Also, when rebooting I see this error: Unmounting all other currently mounted file systems... umount: /: device is busy. (In some cases useful info about processes that use the device is found by lsof(8) or fuser(1)) Very odd... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (38 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-24 18:17 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-24 18:20 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-24 19:27 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (9 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-24 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #40 from carlos.velasco@nimastelecom.com 2010-01-24 18:20:15 --- After rebooting the temp files are gone... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (39 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-24 18:20 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-24 19:27 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-25 1:37 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (8 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-24 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #41 from carlos.velasco@nimastelecom.com 2010-01-24 19:27:33 --- Tested with unpatched kernel and the temp files are there too. Can't test the error unmounting / because when /tmp is unmounted it gives oops. This may be another problem. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (40 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-24 19:27 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-25 1:37 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-25 10:29 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (7 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-25 1:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #42 from carlos.velasco@nimastelecom.com 2010-01-25 01:37:33 --- Same problem using 2.6.33-rc5 with the patch. Unmounting all other currently mounted file systems... umount: /: device is busy. (In some cases useful info about processes that use the device is found by lsof(8) or fuser(1)) I don't know why but this only happens with the patch applied. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (41 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-25 1:37 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-25 10:29 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-25 12:07 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (6 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-25 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #43 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> 2010-01-25 10:28:58 --- Please clarify exactly what you do to trigger the busy /. Did you run the glibc test suite or the specific tst-mutex9 program? If so, then without the futex_lock_pi() patch you wouldn't even get to a normal shutdown due to the oops, so the busy / may be normal and caused by something else. Also, does the busy / prevent the shutdown from succeeding? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (42 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-25 10:29 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-25 12:07 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-28 17:19 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (5 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-25 12:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #44 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2010-01-25 12:07:11 --- Carlos, EBUSY from umount usually means that some process has some file open on the filesystem (/ in your case). Are there any usual processes running before you run shutdown? Or maybe you could try just switching to single user mode and then use lsof to see processes which have files open on /... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (43 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-25 12:07 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-28 17:19 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-28 17:23 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (4 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-28 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #45 from carlos.velasco@nimastelecom.com 2010-01-28 17:19:13 --- Sorry about delay, I made further tests. I think the patch is good and this is another problem. The oops happened during TEST of the eglibc. This has been solved by the patch. This second issue is related to the INSTALL of the eglibc. After "make install" and reboot I always see an umount busy message for /. This busy message was not seen before because we stepped into the oops umounting /tmp, before umounting /. I tried downgrading to linux kernel 2.6.28 but I couldn't, I receive an NMI interrupt and system hang before testing with this kernel. So I have issued a "ps -ef" and a lsof just before the umount all. Looking output of ps, there are no user processes apart of these: root 30920 1 0 17:50 ttyS1 00:00:00 init [6] root 30921 30920 0 17:50 ttyS1 00:00:00 /bin/bash /etc/rc.d/init.d/rc 6 root 31085 30921 0 17:50 ttyS1 00:00:00 /bin/bash /etc/rc.d/rc6.d/S70mou Umount command is: "umount -a -d -r >/dev/null" I ONLY see this error when installing eglibc. Rebooting the system without installing eglibc is successful without errors. Looking into LSOF, I have been looking into differences between a "good reboot" and a "bad reboot - umount busy". I can only see that in the "bad reboot" the SIZE/OFF columns are empty for the new installed eglibc files. Bad: COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME init 1 root DEL REG 253,1 887056 /lib64/libc-2.10.1.so init 1 root DEL REG 253,1 887055 /lib64/ld-2.10.1.so Good: COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME init 1 root mem REG 253,1 1752309 887013 /lib64/libc-2.10.1.so init 1 root mem REG 253,1 149463 887007 /lib64/ld-2.10.1.so Not sure how to proceed from here. Not sure if this is an ext3 issue also... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (44 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-28 17:19 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-28 17:23 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-28 17:24 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (3 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-28 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #46 from carlos.velasco@nimastelecom.com 2010-01-28 17:23:55 --- Created an attachment (id=24757) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=24757) lsof before umount in a reboor without busy error -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (45 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-28 17:23 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-28 17:24 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-28 17:25 ` bugzilla-daemon ` (2 subsequent siblings) 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-28 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #47 from carlos.velasco@nimastelecom.com 2010-01-28 17:24:43 --- Created an attachment (id=24758) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=24758) lsof before umount in a "bad" reboot with busy error -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (46 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-28 17:24 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-28 17:25 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-28 17:55 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-02-10 19:16 ` bugzilla-daemon 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-28 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 carlos.velasco@nimastelecom.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #24757|lsof before umount in a |lsof before umount in a description|reboor without busy error |reboot without busy error -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (47 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-28 17:25 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-28 17:55 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-02-10 19:16 ` bugzilla-daemon 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-28 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 --- Comment #48 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2010-01-28 17:55:53 --- Thanks for debugging Carlos! Note, that in the 'bad' case, the files are deleted... When there are still open but deleted files, we cannot remount the filesystem read-only because that would make deleting the file at closing of the last file descriptor impossible. So what you see is an expected behavior... Mikael, will you take care of pushing your fix to vanilla kernel and possibly also -stable releases? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon ` (48 preceding siblings ...) 2010-01-28 17:55 ` bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-02-10 19:16 ` bugzilla-daemon 49 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-02-10 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|fs_ext3@kernel-bugs.osdl.or |jack@suse.cz |g | --- Comment #49 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2010-02-10 19:15:27 --- Rafael, the patch has been merged as 5ecb01cfdf96c5f465192bdb2a4fd4a61a24c6cc so I'm closing the bug. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* 2.6.32-rc1-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31 @ 2009-10-01 19:53 Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-10-01 19:56 ` [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 71+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-01 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI [Notes: * Quite a number of new regressions from 2.6.30 has been reported during the last three weeks. * The number of unresolved regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31 is now the second highest ever.] This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2009-10-02 151 49 42 2009-09-06 123 34 27 2009-08-26 108 33 26 2009-08-20 102 32 29 2009-08-10 89 27 24 2009-08-02 76 36 28 2009-07-27 70 51 43 2009-07-07 35 25 21 2009-06-29 22 22 15 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14301 Subject : WARNING: at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:154 Submitter : Ralf Hildebrandt <Ralf.Hildebrandt@charite.de> Date : 2009-09-30 12:24 (2 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125431350218137&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14294 Subject : kernel BUG at drivers/ide/ide-disk.c:187 Submitter : Santiago Garcia Mantinan <manty@manty.net> Date : 2009-09-30 11:05 (2 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125430926311466&w=4 Handled-By : David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14270 Subject : Cannot boot on a PIII Celeron Submitter : Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> Date : 2009-09-28 15:26 (4 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125415160524110&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14267 Subject : Disassociating atheros wlan Submitter : Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com> Date : 2009-09-24 10:16 (8 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125378723723384&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14266 Subject : regression in page writeback Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Date : 2009-09-22 5:49 (10 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d7831a0bdf06b9f722b947bb0c205ff7d77cebd8 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125359858117176&w=4 Handled-By : Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14265 Subject : ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, mode:0x8020 w/ e100 Submitter : Karol Lewandowski <karol.k.lewandowski@gmail.com> Date : 2009-09-15 12:05 (17 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125301636509517&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14264 Subject : ehci problem - mouse dead on scroll Submitter : Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com> Date : 2009-09-12 7:46 (20 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125274202707893&w=4 Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14257 Subject : Not able to boot on 32 bit System Submitter : Rishikesh <risrajak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date : 2009-09-21 15:25 (11 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125354604314412&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (11 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125351816109264&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14255 Subject : WARNING: at drivers/char/tty_io.c:1267 Submitter : Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org> Date : 2009-09-20 11:37 (12 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125344629506309&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/8/393 Handled-By : Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14254 Subject : Hibernation broken by clocksource: Save mult_orig in clocksource_disable() Submitter : Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org> Date : 2009-09-19 19:55 (13 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=c7121843685de2bf7f3afd3ae1d6a146010bf1fc References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125339012527719&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14252 Subject : WARNING: at include/linux/skbuff.h:1382 w/ e1000 Submitter : Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com> Date : 2009-09-20 11:26 (12 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125344599006033&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14251 Subject : 2.6.31: no login prompt Submitter : Frédéric L. W. Meunier <fredlwm@gmail.com> Date : 2009-09-19 22:43 (13 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125340020804711&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14249 Subject : BUG: oops in gss_validate on 2.6.31 Submitter : Bastian Blank <bastian@waldi.eu.org> Date : 2009-09-16 10:29 (16 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125309700417283&w=4 Handled-By : Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14248 Subject : 2.6.31 wireless: WARNING: at net/wireless/ibss.c:34 Submitter : Jurriaan <thunder8@xs4all.nl> Date : 2009-09-13 7:32 (19 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125282721113553&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14222 Subject : Hibernation oopses for the 2nd time with 2.6.31 (won't fit the screen) Submitter : Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org> Date : 2009-09-24 14:07 (8 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=c7121843685de2bf7f3afd3ae1d6a146010bf1fc Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14205 Subject : Intel DX58SO mainboard - powering off takes really long Submitter : Tomasz Chmielewski <tch@wpkg.org> Date : 2009-09-22 10:14 (10 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14204 Subject : MCE prevent booting on my computer(pentium iii @500Mhz) Submitter : GNUtoo <GNUtoo@no-log.org> Date : 2009-09-21 20:36 (11 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14185 Subject : Oops in driversbasefirmware_class Submitter : <lars_ericsson@telia.com> Date : 2009-09-17 05:09 (15 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6e03a201bbe8137487f340d26aa662110e324b20 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14181 Subject : b43 causes panic at system shutdown Submitter : Jeremy Huddleston <jeremyhu@freedesktop.org> Date : 2009-09-15 18:34 (17 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14157 Subject : end_request: I/O error, dev cciss/cXdX, sector 0 Submitter : <jiri.harcarik@gmail.com> Date : 2009-09-11 07:42 (21 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14143 Subject : OOPS when setting nr_requests for md devices Submitter : aCaB <acab@clamav.net> Date : 2009-09-08 08:48 (24 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14141 Subject : order 2 page allocation failures in iwlagn Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2009-09-06 7:40 (26 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125222287419691&w=4 Handled-By : Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14133 Subject : WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/smp.c:117 native_smp_send_reschedule Submitter : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> Date : 2009-08-31 20:43 (32 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125175143918050&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14114 Subject : Tuning a saa7134 based card is broken in kernel 2.6.31-rc7 Submitter : Tsvety Petrov <Tsvetoslav.Petrov@itron.com> Date : 2009-09-03 21:06 (29 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14090 Subject : WARNING: at fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c:394 Submitter : Joerg Platte <bugzilla@jako.ping.de> Date : 2009-08-30 15:21 (33 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14070 Subject : lockdep warning triggered by dup_fd Submitter : Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@gmail.com> Date : 2009-08-23 09:36 (40 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/23/8 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14058 Subject : Oops in fsnotify Submitter : Grant Wilson <grant.wilson@zen.co.uk> Date : 2009-08-20 15:48 (43 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125078450923133&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14013 Subject : hd don't show up Submitter : Tim Blechmann <tim@klingt.org> Date : 2009-08-14 8:26 (49 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125023842514480&w=4 Handled-By : Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13987 Subject : Received NMI interrupt at resume Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr> Date : 2009-08-15 07:55 (48 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13950 Subject : Oops when USB Serial disconnected while in use Submitter : Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org> Date : 2009-08-08 17:47 (55 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124975432900466&w=4 Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13943 Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com> Date : 2009-08-06 20:15 (57 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124958978600600&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13942 Subject : Troubles with AoE and uninitialized object Submitter : Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org> Date : 2009-08-04 10:12 (59 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124938117104811&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941 Subject : x86 Geode issue Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi> Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (60 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940 Subject : iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related Submitter : Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira <storm@sys49152.net> Date : 2009-08-07 22:33 (56 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968457731107&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13935 Subject : 2.6.31-rcX breaks Apple MightyMouse (Bluetooth version) Submitter : Adrian Ulrich <kernel@blinkenlights.ch> Date : 2009-08-08 22:08 (55 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=fa047e4f6fa63a6e9d0ae4d7749538830d14a343 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13906 Subject : Huawei E169 GPRS connection causes Ooops Submitter : Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy@gmail.com> Date : 2009-08-04 09:02 (59 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13869 Subject : Radeon framebuffer (w/o KMS) corruption at boot. Submitter : Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Date : 2009-07-29 16:44 (65 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13836 Subject : suspend script fails, related to stdout? Submitter : Tomas M. <tmezzadra@gmail.com> Date : 2009-07-17 21:24 (77 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124785853811667&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13809 Subject : oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected Submitter : Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com> Date : 2009-07-22 13:35 (72 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13733 Subject : 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared Submitter : Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@gmail.com> Date : 2009-07-06 18:32 (88 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124690524027166&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13645 Subject : NULL pointer dereference at (null) (level2_spare_pgt) Submitter : poornima nayak <mpnayak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date : 2009-06-17 17:56 (107 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/17/194 Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14275 Subject : kernel>=2.6.31: ahci.c: do not force unconditionally sb600 to 32bit dma any more? Submitter : gabriele balducci <balducci@units.it> Date : 2009-09-30 15:02 (2 days old) Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14275#c0 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14261 Subject : e1000e jumbo frames no longer work: 'Unsupported MTU setting' Submitter : Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk> Date : 2009-09-26 11:16 (6 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125396433321342&w=4 Handled-By : Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/50277/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14258 Subject : Memory leak in SCSI initialization Submitter : Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Date : 2009-09-22 4:18 (10 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125359311312243&w=4 Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/49258/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14253 Subject : Oops in driversbasefirmware_class Submitter : Lars Ericsson <Lars_Ericsson@telia.com> Date : 2009-09-16 20:44 (16 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/16/461 Handled-By : Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt@xprog.eu> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/49914/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14137 Subject : usb console regressions Submitter : Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com> Date : 2009-09-05 21:08 (27 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125218501310512&w=4 Handled-By : Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/45953/ http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/45952/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14017 Subject : _end symbol missing from Symbol.map Submitter : Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Date : 2009-08-13 6:45 (50 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=091e52c3551d3031343df24b573b770b4c6c72b6 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014649102253&w=4 Handled-By : Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014649102253&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13948 Subject : ath5k broken after suspend-to-ram Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net> Date : 2009-08-07 21:51 (56 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968192727854&w=4 Handled-By : Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@gmail.com> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/38550/ For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13615 Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-10-01 19:53 2.6.32-rc1-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-01 19:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-10-04 17:38 ` Mikael Pettersson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 71+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-01 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Mikael Pettersson This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (11 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125351816109264&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-10-01 19:56 ` [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-04 17:38 ` Mikael Pettersson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: Mikael Pettersson @ 2009-10-04 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Mikael Pettersson Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14256 > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 > Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> > Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (11 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125351816109264&w=3D4 The exact same bug (same cause, same symptom) just hit me again in 2.6.32-rc1. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 @ 2009-10-04 17:38 ` Mikael Pettersson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: Mikael Pettersson @ 2009-10-04 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Mikael Pettersson Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14256 > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 > Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe-1zs4UD6AkMk@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (11 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125351816109264&w=3D4 The exact same bug (same cause, same symptom) just hit me again in 2.6.32-rc1. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-10-04 17:38 ` Mikael Pettersson (?) @ 2009-10-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-10-04 23:04 ` Mikael Pettersson -1 siblings, 1 reply; 71+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-04 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mikael Pettersson; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Sunday 04 October 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14256 > > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 > > Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> > > Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (11 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125351816109264&w=3D4 > > The exact same bug (same cause, same symptom) just hit me again in 2.6.32-rc1. Thanks for the update. Could you check the current Linus' tree, please? There are some known regression fixes in there. Best, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 @ 2009-10-04 23:04 ` Mikael Pettersson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: Mikael Pettersson @ 2009-10-04 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Mikael Pettersson, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List Rafael J. Wysocki writes: > On Sunday 04 October 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should > > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14256 > > > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 > > > Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> > > > Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (11 days old) > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125351816109264&w=3D4 > > > > The exact same bug (same cause, same symptom) just hit me again in 2.6.32-rc1. > > Thanks for the update. > > Could you check the current Linus' tree, please? There are some known > regression fixes in there. I tried simplified versions of the bug trigger on two machines running 2.6.32-rc1-git6, and neither triggered the kernel bug. The original recipe involved doing a glibc rebuild, run its test suite, install it, and reboot. Today however machine 1 was already doing a rebuild so after the rebuild it did a reboot into the new kernel before the install. The second machine booted the new kernel directly to install the binary packages from the first machine. I'll re-run the full bug trigger recipe on a third machine later next week (it must rebuild glibc itself anyway due to arch differences). ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 @ 2009-10-04 23:04 ` Mikael Pettersson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: Mikael Pettersson @ 2009-10-04 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Mikael Pettersson, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List Rafael J. Wysocki writes: > On Sunday 04 October 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should > > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14256 > > > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 > > > Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe-1zs4UD6AkMk@public.gmane.org> > > > Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (11 days old) > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125351816109264&w=3D4 > > > > The exact same bug (same cause, same symptom) just hit me again in 2.6.32-rc1. > > Thanks for the update. > > Could you check the current Linus' tree, please? There are some known > regression fixes in there. I tried simplified versions of the bug trigger on two machines running 2.6.32-rc1-git6, and neither triggered the kernel bug. The original recipe involved doing a glibc rebuild, run its test suite, install it, and reboot. Today however machine 1 was already doing a rebuild so after the rebuild it did a reboot into the new kernel before the install. The second machine booted the new kernel directly to install the binary packages from the first machine. I'll re-run the full bug trigger recipe on a third machine later next week (it must rebuild glibc itself anyway due to arch differences). ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 @ 2009-10-09 16:40 ` Mikael Pettersson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: Mikael Pettersson @ 2009-10-09 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mikael Pettersson Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List Mikael Pettersson writes: > Rafael J. Wysocki writes: > > On Sunday 04 October 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > > > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should > > > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14256 > > > > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 > > > > Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> > > > > Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (11 days old) > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125351816109264&w=3D4 > > > > > > The exact same bug (same cause, same symptom) just hit me again in 2.6.32-rc1. > > > > Thanks for the update. > > > > Could you check the current Linus' tree, please? There are some known > > regression fixes in there. > > I tried simplified versions of the bug trigger on two machines > running 2.6.32-rc1-git6, and neither triggered the kernel bug. > > The original recipe involved doing a glibc rebuild, run its test > suite, install it, and reboot. Today however machine 1 was already > doing a rebuild so after the rebuild it did a reboot into the new > kernel before the install. The second machine booted the new kernel > directly to install the binary packages from the first machine. > > I'll re-run the full bug trigger recipe on a third machine later next > week (it must rebuild glibc itself anyway due to arch differences). Not fixed in 2.6.32-rc3. A glibc rebuild + install triggered the exact same bug on the third machine. /Mikael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 @ 2009-10-09 16:40 ` Mikael Pettersson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: Mikael Pettersson @ 2009-10-09 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mikael Pettersson Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List Mikael Pettersson writes: > Rafael J. Wysocki writes: > > On Sunday 04 October 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > > > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should > > > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14256 > > > > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 > > > > Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe-1zs4UD6AkMk@public.gmane.org> > > > > Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (11 days old) > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125351816109264&w=3D4 > > > > > > The exact same bug (same cause, same symptom) just hit me again in 2.6.32-rc1. > > > > Thanks for the update. > > > > Could you check the current Linus' tree, please? There are some known > > regression fixes in there. > > I tried simplified versions of the bug trigger on two machines > running 2.6.32-rc1-git6, and neither triggered the kernel bug. > > The original recipe involved doing a glibc rebuild, run its test > suite, install it, and reboot. Today however machine 1 was already > doing a rebuild so after the rebuild it did a reboot into the new > kernel before the install. The second machine booted the new kernel > directly to install the binary packages from the first machine. > > I'll re-run the full bug trigger recipe on a third machine later next > week (it must rebuild glibc itself anyway due to arch differences). Not fixed in 2.6.32-rc3. A glibc rebuild + install triggered the exact same bug on the third machine. /Mikael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 @ 2009-10-09 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-09 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mikael Pettersson; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Friday 09 October 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > Mikael Pettersson writes: > > Rafael J. Wysocki writes: > > > On Sunday 04 October 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > > > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > > > > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should > > > > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14256 > > > > > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 > > > > > Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> > > > > > Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (11 days old) > > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125351816109264&w=3D4 > > > > > > > > The exact same bug (same cause, same symptom) just hit me again in 2.6.32-rc1. > > > > > > Thanks for the update. > > > > > > Could you check the current Linus' tree, please? There are some known > > > regression fixes in there. > > > > I tried simplified versions of the bug trigger on two machines > > running 2.6.32-rc1-git6, and neither triggered the kernel bug. > > > > The original recipe involved doing a glibc rebuild, run its test > > suite, install it, and reboot. Today however machine 1 was already > > doing a rebuild so after the rebuild it did a reboot into the new > > kernel before the install. The second machine booted the new kernel > > directly to install the binary packages from the first machine. > > > > I'll re-run the full bug trigger recipe on a third machine later next > > week (it must rebuild glibc itself anyway due to arch differences). > > Not fixed in 2.6.32-rc3. A glibc rebuild + install triggered the > exact same bug on the third machine. Thanks for the update. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 @ 2009-10-09 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-09 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mikael Pettersson; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Friday 09 October 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > Mikael Pettersson writes: > > Rafael J. Wysocki writes: > > > On Sunday 04 October 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > > > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > > > > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should > > > > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14256 > > > > > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 > > > > > Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe-1zs4UD6AkMk@public.gmane.org> > > > > > Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (11 days old) > > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125351816109264&w=3D4 > > > > > > > > The exact same bug (same cause, same symptom) just hit me again in 2.6.32-rc1. > > > > > > Thanks for the update. > > > > > > Could you check the current Linus' tree, please? There are some known > > > regression fixes in there. > > > > I tried simplified versions of the bug trigger on two machines > > running 2.6.32-rc1-git6, and neither triggered the kernel bug. > > > > The original recipe involved doing a glibc rebuild, run its test > > suite, install it, and reboot. Today however machine 1 was already > > doing a rebuild so after the rebuild it did a reboot into the new > > kernel before the install. The second machine booted the new kernel > > directly to install the binary packages from the first machine. > > > > I'll re-run the full bug trigger recipe on a third machine later next > > week (it must rebuild glibc itself anyway due to arch differences). > > Not fixed in 2.6.32-rc3. A glibc rebuild + install triggered the > exact same bug on the third machine. Thanks for the update. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* 2.6.32-rc4: Reported regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31 @ 2009-10-11 22:41 Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-10-11 23:01 ` [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 71+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-11 22:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI [Note: 10 new reports in the last 10 days, but fortunately we're fixing them faster than they're being reported.] This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2009-10-12 161 45 35 2009-10-02 151 49 42 2009-09-06 123 34 27 2009-08-26 108 33 26 2009-08-20 102 32 29 2009-08-10 89 27 24 2009-08-02 76 36 28 2009-07-27 70 51 43 2009-07-07 35 25 21 2009-06-29 22 22 15 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14391 Subject : use after free of struct powernow_k8_data Submitter : Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com> Date : 2009-09-24 14:51 (18 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125380383515615&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14388 Subject : keyboard under X with 2.6.31 Submitter : Frédéric L. W. Meunier <fredlwm@gmail.com> Date : 2009-10-07 20:19 (5 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e043e42bdb66885b3ac10d27a01ccb9972e2b0a3 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125494753228217&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14385 Subject : DMAR regression in 2.6.31 leads to ext4 corruption? Submitter : Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org> Date : 2009-10-08 23:56 (4 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125504643703877&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14377 Subject : "conservative" cpufreq governor broken Submitter : Steven Noonan <steven@uplinklabs.net> Date : 2009-10-05 16:32 (7 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=f2e21c9610991e95621a81407cdbab881226419b References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125476067108252&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14329 Subject : Sata disk doesn't wake up after S3 suspend Submitter : <frodone@gmail.com> Date : 2009-10-05 22:58 (7 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14309 Subject : MCA on hp rx8640 Submitter : Andrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@hp.com> Date : 2009-09-29 17:20 (13 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=db8be50c4307dac2b37305fc59c8dc0f978d09ea References : http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg22799.html Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14294 Subject : kernel BUG at drivers/ide/ide-disk.c:187 Submitter : Santiago Garcia Mantinan <manty@manty.net> Date : 2009-09-30 11:05 (12 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125430926311466&w=4 Handled-By : David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14267 Subject : Disassociating atheros wlan Submitter : Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com> Date : 2009-09-24 10:16 (18 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125378723723384&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14266 Subject : regression in page writeback Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Date : 2009-09-22 5:49 (20 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d7831a0bdf06b9f722b947bb0c205ff7d77cebd8 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125359858117176&w=4 Handled-By : Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14265 Subject : ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, mode:0x8020 w/ e100 Submitter : Karol Lewandowski <karol.k.lewandowski@gmail.com> Date : 2009-09-15 12:05 (27 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125301636509517&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14264 Subject : ehci problem - mouse dead on scroll Submitter : Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com> Date : 2009-09-12 7:46 (30 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125274202707893&w=4 Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14257 Subject : Not able to boot on 32 bit System Submitter : Rishikesh <risrajak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date : 2009-09-21 15:25 (21 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125354604314412&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (21 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125351816109264&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14252 Subject : WARNING: at include/linux/skbuff.h:1382 w/ e1000 Submitter : Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com> Date : 2009-09-20 11:26 (22 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125344599006033&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14249 Subject : BUG: oops in gss_validate on 2.6.31 Submitter : Bastian Blank <bastian@waldi.eu.org> Date : 2009-09-16 10:29 (26 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125309700417283&w=4 Handled-By : Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14248 Subject : 2.6.31 wireless: WARNING: at net/wireless/ibss.c:34 Submitter : Jurriaan <thunder8@xs4all.nl> Date : 2009-09-13 7:32 (29 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125282721113553&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14204 Subject : MCE prevent booting on my computer(pentium iii @500Mhz) Submitter : GNUtoo <GNUtoo@no-log.org> Date : 2009-09-21 20:36 (21 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14185 Subject : Oops in driversbasefirmware_class Submitter : <lars_ericsson@telia.com> Date : 2009-09-17 05:09 (25 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6e03a201bbe8137487f340d26aa662110e324b20 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14181 Subject : b43 causes panic at ifconfig down / shutdown Submitter : Jeremy Huddleston <jeremyhu@freedesktop.org> Date : 2009-09-15 18:34 (27 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14157 Subject : end_request: I/O error, dev cciss/cXdX, sector 0 Submitter : <jiri.harcarik@gmail.com> Date : 2009-09-11 07:42 (31 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14143 Subject : OOPS when setting nr_requests for md devices Submitter : aCaB <acab@clamav.net> Date : 2009-09-08 08:48 (34 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14141 Subject : order 2 page allocation failures in iwlagn Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2009-09-06 7:40 (36 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ff05b2b4eac2e63d345fc731ea151a060247f53 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125222287419691&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/2/86 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/5/24 Handled-By : Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14114 Subject : Tuning a saa7134 based card is broken in kernel 2.6.31-rc7 Submitter : Tsvety Petrov <Tsvetoslav.Petrov@itron.com> Date : 2009-09-03 21:06 (39 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14090 Subject : WARNING: at fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c:394 Submitter : Joerg Platte <bugzilla@jako.ping.de> Date : 2009-08-30 15:21 (43 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14070 Subject : lockdep warning triggered by dup_fd Submitter : Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@gmail.com> Date : 2009-08-23 09:36 (50 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/23/8 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14058 Subject : Oops in fsnotify Submitter : Grant Wilson <grant.wilson@zen.co.uk> Date : 2009-08-20 15:48 (53 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125078450923133&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14013 Subject : hd don't show up Submitter : Tim Blechmann <tim@klingt.org> Date : 2009-08-14 8:26 (59 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125023842514480&w=4 Handled-By : Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13987 Subject : Received NMI interrupt at resume Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr> Date : 2009-08-15 07:55 (58 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13943 Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com> Date : 2009-08-06 20:15 (67 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124958978600600&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941 Subject : x86 Geode issue Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi> Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (70 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13906 Subject : Huawei E169 GPRS connection causes Ooops Submitter : Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy@gmail.com> Date : 2009-08-04 09:02 (69 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13836 Subject : suspend script fails, related to stdout? Submitter : Tomas M. <tmezzadra@gmail.com> Date : 2009-07-17 21:24 (87 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124785853811667&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13809 Subject : oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected Submitter : Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com> Date : 2009-07-22 13:35 (82 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13733 Subject : 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared Submitter : Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@gmail.com> Date : 2009-07-06 18:32 (98 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124690524027166&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13645 Subject : NULL pointer dereference at (null) (level2_spare_pgt) Submitter : poornima nayak <mpnayak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date : 2009-06-17 17:56 (117 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/17/194 Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14301 Subject : WARNING: at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:154 Submitter : Ralf Hildebrandt <Ralf.Hildebrandt@charite.de> Date : 2009-09-30 12:24 (12 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125431350218137&w=4 Handled-By : Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/52743/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14275 Subject : kernel>=2.6.31: ahci.c: do not force unconditionally sb600 to 32bit dma any more? Submitter : gabriele balducci <balducci@units.it> Date : 2009-09-30 15:02 (12 days old) Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14275#c0 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14261 Subject : e1000e jumbo frames no longer work: 'Unsupported MTU setting' Submitter : Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk> Date : 2009-09-26 11:16 (16 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125396433321342&w=4 Handled-By : Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/50277/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14258 Subject : Memory leak in SCSI initialization Submitter : Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Date : 2009-09-22 4:18 (20 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125359311312243&w=4 Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/51412/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14253 Subject : Oops in driversbasefirmware_class Submitter : Lars Ericsson <Lars_Ericsson@telia.com> Date : 2009-09-16 20:44 (26 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/16/461 Handled-By : Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt@xprog.eu> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/49914/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14137 Subject : usb console regressions Submitter : Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com> Date : 2009-09-05 21:08 (37 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125218501310512&w=4 Handled-By : Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/45953/ http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/45952/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14129 Subject : 2.6.31 regression - pci_get_slot oops, udev boot hang - toshiba X200 Submitter : chepioq <chepioq@gmail.com> Date : 2009-09-06 07:01 (36 days old) Handled-By : Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/51834/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14017 Subject : _end symbol missing from Symbol.map Submitter : Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Date : 2009-08-13 6:45 (60 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=091e52c3551d3031343df24b573b770b4c6c72b6 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014649102253&w=4 Handled-By : Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014649102253&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13948 Subject : ath5k broken after suspend-to-ram Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net> Date : 2009-08-07 21:51 (66 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968192727854&w=4 Handled-By : Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@gmail.com> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/38550/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940 Subject : 2.6.31-rc1 - iwlagn and sky2 stopped working when ACPI enabled - Toshiba U400-17b, Acer Aspire 8935G Submitter : Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira <storm@sys49152.net> Date : 2009-08-07 22:33 (66 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968457731107&w=4 Handled-By : Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=23280 For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13615 Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-10-11 22:41 2.6.32-rc4: Reported regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-11 23:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-11 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Mikael Pettersson This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (21 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125351816109264&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* 2.6.32-rc5-git3: Reported regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31 @ 2009-10-26 19:26 Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 71+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2009-10-26 170 37 32 2009-10-12 161 45 35 2009-10-02 151 49 42 2009-09-06 123 34 27 2009-08-26 108 33 26 2009-08-20 102 32 29 2009-08-10 89 27 24 2009-08-02 76 36 28 2009-07-27 70 51 43 2009-07-07 35 25 21 2009-06-29 22 22 15 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14476 Subject : Unable to handle kernel paging request in nfs_write_mapping Submitter : Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com> Date : 2009-10-14 9:53 (13 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125551421405656&w=4 Handled-By : Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14474 Subject : restorecond going crazy on 2.6.31.4 - inotify regression? Submitter : Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com> Date : 2009-10-16 0:03 (11 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125565159520489&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14446 Subject : battery status info broken/useless in 2.6.32-rc3 - MSI PR200 (possibly others, too) Submitter : Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor+linbug@gmail.com> Date : 2009-10-20 08:25 (7 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14417 Subject : [Regression] Wireless driver iwlagn+iwlcore doesn't work after resume (needs reloading) Submitter : Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor+linbug@gmail.com> Date : 2009-10-16 11:07 (11 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14402 Subject : Atheros ath9k module is not working with 2.6.31.1 on an Acer Extensa 7630EZ Submitter : Bernhard <berndl81@gmx.at> Date : 2009-10-14 11:17 (13 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14400 Subject : disable/enable wlan broken with ath5k Submitter : Daniel Bumke <danielbumke@gmail.com> Date : 2009-10-13 12:35 (14 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14391 Subject : use after free of struct powernow_k8_data Submitter : Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com> Date : 2009-09-24 14:51 (33 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125380383515615&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14388 Subject : keyboard under X with 2.6.31 Submitter : Frédéric L. W. Meunier <fredlwm@gmail.com> Date : 2009-10-07 20:19 (20 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e043e42bdb66885b3ac10d27a01ccb9972e2b0a3 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125494753228217&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14385 Subject : DMAR regression in 2.6.31 leads to ext4 corruption? Submitter : Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org> Date : 2009-10-08 23:56 (19 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125504643703877&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14294 Subject : kernel BUG at drivers/ide/ide-disk.c:187 Submitter : Santiago Garcia Mantinan <manty@manty.net> Date : 2009-09-30 11:05 (27 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125430926311466&w=4 Handled-By : David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14267 Subject : Disassociating atheros wlan Submitter : Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com> Date : 2009-09-24 10:16 (33 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125378723723384&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14265 Subject : ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, mode:0x8020 w/ e100 Submitter : Karol Lewandowski <karol.k.lewandowski@gmail.com> Date : 2009-09-15 12:05 (42 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125301636509517&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14257 Subject : Not able to boot on 32 bit System Submitter : Rishikesh <risrajak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date : 2009-09-21 15:25 (36 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125354604314412&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (36 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125351816109264&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14252 Subject : WARNING: at include/linux/skbuff.h:1382 w/ e1000 Submitter : Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com> Date : 2009-09-20 11:26 (37 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125344599006033&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14249 Subject : BUG: oops in gss_validate on 2.6.31 Submitter : Bastian Blank <bastian@waldi.eu.org> Date : 2009-09-16 10:29 (41 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125309700417283&w=4 Handled-By : Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14248 Subject : 2.6.31 wireless: WARNING: at net/wireless/ibss.c:34 Submitter : Jurriaan <thunder8@xs4all.nl> Date : 2009-09-13 7:32 (44 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125282721113553&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14204 Subject : MCE prevent booting on my computer(pentium iii @500Mhz) Submitter : GNUtoo <GNUtoo@no-log.org> Date : 2009-09-21 20:36 (36 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14181 Subject : b43 causes panic at ifconfig down / shutdown Submitter : Jeremy Huddleston <jeremyhu@freedesktop.org> Date : 2009-09-15 18:34 (42 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14157 Subject : end_request: I/O error, dev cciss/cXdX, sector 0 Submitter : <jiri.harcarik@gmail.com> Date : 2009-09-11 07:42 (46 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14141 Subject : order 2 page allocation failures in iwlagn Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2009-09-06 7:40 (51 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ff05b2b4eac2e63d345fc731ea151a060247f53 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125222287419691&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/2/86 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/5/24 http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0910.1/01395.html Handled-By : Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14114 Subject : Tuning a saa7134 based card is broken in kernel 2.6.31-rc7 Submitter : Tsvety Petrov <Tsvetoslav.Petrov@itron.com> Date : 2009-09-03 21:06 (54 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14090 Subject : WARNING: at fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c:394 Submitter : Joerg Platte <bugzilla@jako.ping.de> Date : 2009-08-30 15:21 (58 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14058 Subject : Oops in fsnotify Submitter : Grant Wilson <grant.wilson@zen.co.uk> Date : 2009-08-20 15:48 (68 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125078450923133&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13987 Subject : Received NMI interrupt at resume Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr> Date : 2009-08-15 07:55 (73 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=f41f3f373dd72344c65d801d6381fe83ef3a2c54 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13943 Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com> Date : 2009-08-06 20:15 (82 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124958978600600&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941 Subject : x86 Geode issue Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi> Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (85 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13906 Subject : Huawei E169 GPRS connection causes Ooops Submitter : Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy@gmail.com> Date : 2009-08-04 09:02 (84 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13836 Subject : suspend script fails, related to stdout? Submitter : Tomas M. <tmezzadra@gmail.com> Date : 2009-07-17 21:24 (102 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124785853811667&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13809 Subject : oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected Submitter : Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com> Date : 2009-07-22 13:35 (97 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13733 Subject : 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared Submitter : Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@gmail.com> Date : 2009-07-06 18:32 (113 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124690524027166&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13645 Subject : NULL pointer dereference at (null) (level2_spare_pgt) Submitter : poornima nayak <mpnayak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date : 2009-06-17 17:56 (132 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/17/194 Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14340 Subject : speedstep-ich driver not working in 2.6.31 Submitter : <dave.mueller@gmx.ch> Date : 2009-10-07 08:16 (20 days old) Handled-By : Eric Pielbug <e.a.b.piel@tudelft.nl> Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/54672/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14258 Subject : Memory leak in SCSI initialization Submitter : Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Date : 2009-09-22 4:18 (35 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125359311312243&w=4 Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/51412/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14253 Subject : Oops in driversbasefirmware_class Submitter : Lars Ericsson <Lars_Ericsson@telia.com> Date : 2009-09-16 20:44 (41 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/16/461 Handled-By : Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt@xprog.eu> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/49914/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14137 Subject : usb console regressions Submitter : Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com> Date : 2009-09-05 21:08 (52 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125218501310512&w=4 Handled-By : Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/45953/ http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/45952/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14017 Subject : _end symbol missing from Symbol.map Submitter : Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Date : 2009-08-13 6:45 (75 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=091e52c3551d3031343df24b573b770b4c6c72b6 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014649102253&w=4 Handled-By : Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014649102253&w=4 For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13615 Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-10-26 19:26 2.6.32-rc5-git3: Reported regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Mikael Pettersson This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (36 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125351816109264&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 @ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Mikael Pettersson This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe-1zs4UD6AkMk@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (36 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125351816109264&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* 2.6.32-rc7-git1: Reported regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31 @ 2009-11-16 22:58 Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-11-16 23:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 71+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-11-16 22:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2009-11-17 176 34 30 2009-10-26 170 37 32 2009-10-12 161 45 35 2009-10-02 151 49 42 2009-09-06 123 34 27 2009-08-26 108 33 26 2009-08-20 102 32 29 2009-08-10 89 27 24 2009-08-02 76 36 28 2009-07-27 70 51 43 2009-07-07 35 25 21 2009-06-29 22 22 15 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14623 Subject : Mount -o sync regression in 2.6.31 Submitter : Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com> Date : 2009-11-11 20:33 (6 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125797165709131&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14588 Subject : Kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector: Kernel stack is corrupted in: ccccb5b0 Submitter : Hideki Yamane <henrich@debian.or.jp> Date : 2009-11-12 02:25 (5 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14484 Subject : no video output after suspend Submitter : Riccardo Magliocchetti <riccardo.magliocchetti@gmail.com> Date : 2009-10-25 20:57 (23 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125650430123713&w=4 Handled-By : Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14476 Subject : Unable to handle kernel paging request in nfs_write_mapping Submitter : Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com> Date : 2009-10-14 9:53 (34 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125551421405656&w=4 Handled-By : Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14474 Subject : restorecond going crazy on 2.6.31.4 - inotify regression? Submitter : Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com> Date : 2009-10-16 0:03 (32 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125565159520489&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14460 Subject : No wireless connection with Ralink RT2500 since update to kernel 2.6.31 Submitter : Filipp Andjelo <andjelo@gmx.net> Date : 2009-10-24 21:18 (24 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14450 Subject : [2.6.31] Network interfaces are dead with 2.6.31 (iwlagn and sky2) Submitter : A. G. <orion.linbug@gmail.com> Date : 2009-10-21 07:30 (27 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14448 Subject : PAT cpu feature is absent but detected by Xorg and others, cuses video driver problems Submitter : Aleksei Lukin <lukin@stu.cn.ua> Date : 2009-10-20 17:54 (28 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14417 Subject : [Regression] Wireless driver iwlagn+iwlcore doesn't work after resume (needs reloading) Submitter : Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor+linbug@gmail.com> Date : 2009-10-16 11:07 (32 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14400 Subject : disable/enable wlan broken with ath5k Submitter : Daniel Bumke <danielbumke@gmail.com> Date : 2009-10-13 12:35 (35 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14391 Subject : use after free of struct powernow_k8_data Submitter : Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com> Date : 2009-09-24 14:51 (54 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125380383515615&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14385 Subject : DMAR regression in 2.6.31 leads to ext4 corruption? Submitter : Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org> Date : 2009-10-08 23:56 (40 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125504643703877&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14294 Subject : kernel BUG at drivers/ide/ide-disk.c:187 Submitter : Santiago Garcia Mantinan <manty@manty.net> Date : 2009-09-30 11:05 (48 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125430926311466&w=4 Handled-By : David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14267 Subject : Disassociating atheros wlan Submitter : Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com> Date : 2009-09-24 10:16 (54 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125378723723384&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14265 Subject : ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, mode:0x8020 w/ e100 Submitter : Karol Lewandowski <karol.k.lewandowski@gmail.com> Date : 2009-09-15 12:05 (63 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125301636509517&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14257 Subject : Not able to boot on 32 bit System Submitter : Rishikesh <risrajak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date : 2009-09-21 15:25 (57 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125354604314412&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (57 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125351816109264&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14252 Subject : WARNING: at include/linux/skbuff.h:1382 w/ e1000 Submitter : Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com> Date : 2009-09-20 11:26 (58 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125344599006033&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14204 Subject : MCE prevent booting on my computer(pentium iii @500Mhz) Submitter : GNUtoo <GNUtoo@no-log.org> Date : 2009-09-21 20:36 (57 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14181 Subject : b43 causes panic at ifconfig down / shutdown Submitter : Jeremy Huddleston <jeremyhu@freedesktop.org> Date : 2009-09-15 18:34 (63 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14157 Subject : end_request: I/O error, dev cciss/cXdX, sector 0 Submitter : <jiri.harcarik@gmail.com> Date : 2009-09-11 07:42 (67 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14141 Subject : order 2 page allocation failures in iwlagn Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2009-09-06 7:40 (72 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ff05b2b4eac2e63d345fc731ea151a060247f53 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125222287419691&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/2/86 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/5/24 http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0910.1/01395.html Handled-By : Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14114 Subject : Tuning a saa7134 based card is broken in kernel 2.6.31-rc7 Submitter : Tsvety Petrov <Tsvetoslav.Petrov@itron.com> Date : 2009-09-03 21:06 (75 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13987 Subject : Received NMI interrupt at resume Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr> Date : 2009-08-15 07:55 (94 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=f41f3f373dd72344c65d801d6381fe83ef3a2c54 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13943 Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com> Date : 2009-08-06 20:15 (103 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124958978600600&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941 Subject : x86 Geode issue Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi> Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (106 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13836 Subject : suspend script fails, related to stdout? Submitter : Tomas M. <tmezzadra@gmail.com> Date : 2009-07-17 21:24 (123 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124785853811667&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13809 Subject : oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected Submitter : Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com> Date : 2009-07-22 13:35 (118 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13733 Subject : 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared Submitter : Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@gmail.com> Date : 2009-07-06 18:32 (134 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124690524027166&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13645 Subject : NULL pointer dereference at (null) (level2_spare_pgt) Submitter : poornima nayak <mpnayak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date : 2009-06-17 17:56 (153 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/17/194 Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14340 Subject : speedstep-ich driver not working in 2.6.31 Submitter : <dave.mueller@gmx.ch> Date : 2009-10-07 08:16 (41 days old) Handled-By : Eric Pielbug <e.a.b.piel@tudelft.nl> Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/54672/ http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/54671/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14253 Subject : Oops in driversbasefirmware_class Submitter : Lars Ericsson <Lars_Ericsson@telia.com> Date : 2009-09-16 20:44 (62 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/16/461 Handled-By : Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt@xprog.eu> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/49914/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14137 Subject : usb console regressions Submitter : Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com> Date : 2009-09-05 21:08 (73 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125218501310512&w=4 Handled-By : Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/45953/ http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/45952/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14017 Subject : _end symbol missing from Symbol.map Submitter : Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Date : 2009-08-13 6:45 (96 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=091e52c3551d3031343df24b573b770b4c6c72b6 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014649102253&w=4 Handled-By : Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014649102253&w=4 For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13615 Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-11-16 22:58 2.6.32-rc7-git1: Reported regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-11-16 23:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-11-16 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Mikael Pettersson This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (57 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125351816109264&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 @ 2009-11-16 23:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-11-16 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Mikael Pettersson This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe-1zs4UD6AkMk@public.gmane.org> Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (57 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125351816109264&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-11-16 23:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-11-21 12:37 ` Mikael Pettersson -1 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: Mikael Pettersson @ 2009-11-21 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Mikael Pettersson Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14256 > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 > Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> > Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (57 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125351816109264&w=3D4 Still occurs with kernel 2.6.32-rc8. This time I only rebuilt the glibc src rpm, which also runs its test suite, but I did not install the new glibc binaries before the shutdown -r. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 @ 2009-11-21 12:37 ` Mikael Pettersson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: Mikael Pettersson @ 2009-11-21 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Mikael Pettersson Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14256 > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 > Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe-1zs4UD6AkMk@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (57 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125351816109264&w=3D4 Still occurs with kernel 2.6.32-rc8. This time I only rebuilt the glibc src rpm, which also runs its test suite, but I did not install the new glibc binaries before the shutdown -r. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* 2.6.32-rc8-git1: Reported regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31 @ 2009-11-21 14:59 Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-11-21 15:02 ` [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 71+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-11-21 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2009-11-21 178 35 31 2009-11-17 176 34 30 2009-10-26 170 37 32 2009-10-12 161 45 35 2009-10-02 151 49 42 2009-09-06 123 34 27 2009-08-26 108 33 26 2009-08-20 102 32 29 2009-08-10 89 27 24 2009-08-02 76 36 28 2009-07-27 70 51 43 2009-07-07 35 25 21 2009-06-29 22 22 15 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14658 Subject : Regression in efi.c Submitter : indexer <indexer@internode.on.net> Date : 2009-11-17 14:54 (5 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125846988820120&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14649 Subject : KMS not working Submitter : Martin Bammer <mrb74@gmx.at> Date : 2009-11-20 23:00 (2 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14640 Subject : Suspend/resume failed on Thinkpad running Linux with kernel 2.6.31 Submitter : Wayne <wayne.zhang@263.net> Date : 2009-11-19 03:57 (3 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14623 Subject : Mount -o sync regression in 2.6.31 Submitter : Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com> Date : 2009-11-11 20:33 (11 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125797165709131&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14588 Subject : Kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector: Kernel stack is corrupted in: ccccb5b0 Submitter : Hideki Yamane <henrich@debian.or.jp> Date : 2009-11-12 02:25 (10 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14484 Subject : no video output after suspend Submitter : Riccardo Magliocchetti <riccardo.magliocchetti@gmail.com> Date : 2009-10-25 20:57 (28 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125650430123713&w=4 Handled-By : Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14476 Subject : Unable to handle kernel paging request in nfs_write_mapping Submitter : Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com> Date : 2009-10-14 9:53 (39 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125551421405656&w=4 Handled-By : Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14474 Subject : restorecond going crazy on 2.6.31.4 - inotify regression? Submitter : Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com> Date : 2009-10-16 0:03 (37 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125565159520489&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14460 Subject : No wireless connection with Ralink RT2500 since update to kernel 2.6.31 Submitter : Filipp Andjelo <andjelo@gmx.net> Date : 2009-10-24 21:18 (29 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14450 Subject : [2.6.31] Network interfaces are dead with 2.6.31 (iwlagn and sky2) Submitter : A. G. <orion.linbug@gmail.com> Date : 2009-10-21 07:30 (32 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14448 Subject : PAT cpu feature is absent but detected by Xorg and others, cuses video driver problems Submitter : Aleksei Lukin <lukin@stu.cn.ua> Date : 2009-10-20 17:54 (33 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14400 Subject : disable/enable wlan broken with ath5k Submitter : Daniel Bumke <danielbumke@gmail.com> Date : 2009-10-13 12:35 (40 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14391 Subject : use after free of struct powernow_k8_data Submitter : Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com> Date : 2009-09-24 14:51 (59 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125380383515615&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14385 Subject : DMAR regression in 2.6.31 leads to ext4 corruption? Submitter : Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org> Date : 2009-10-08 23:56 (45 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125504643703877&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14294 Subject : kernel BUG at drivers/ide/ide-disk.c:187 Submitter : Santiago Garcia Mantinan <manty@manty.net> Date : 2009-09-30 11:05 (53 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125430926311466&w=4 Handled-By : David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14267 Subject : Disassociating atheros wlan Submitter : Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com> Date : 2009-09-24 10:16 (59 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125378723723384&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14265 Subject : ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, mode:0x8020 w/ e100 Submitter : Karol Lewandowski <karol.k.lewandowski@gmail.com> Date : 2009-09-15 12:05 (68 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125301636509517&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14257 Subject : Not able to boot on 32 bit System Submitter : Rishikesh <risrajak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date : 2009-09-21 15:25 (62 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125354604314412&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (62 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125351816109264&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14252 Subject : WARNING: at include/linux/skbuff.h:1382 w/ e1000 Submitter : Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com> Date : 2009-09-20 11:26 (63 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125344599006033&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14204 Subject : MCE prevent booting on my computer(pentium iii @500Mhz) Submitter : GNUtoo <GNUtoo@no-log.org> Date : 2009-09-21 20:36 (62 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14157 Subject : end_request: I/O error, dev cciss/cXdX, sector 0 Submitter : <jiri.harcarik@gmail.com> Date : 2009-09-11 07:42 (72 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14141 Subject : order 2 page allocation failures in iwlagn Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2009-09-06 7:40 (77 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ff05b2b4eac2e63d345fc731ea151a060247f53 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125222287419691&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/2/86 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/5/24 http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0910.1/01395.html Handled-By : Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14114 Subject : Tuning a saa7134 based card is broken in kernel 2.6.31-rc7 Submitter : Tsvety Petrov <Tsvetoslav.Petrov@itron.com> Date : 2009-09-03 21:06 (80 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13987 Subject : Received NMI interrupt at resume Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr> Date : 2009-08-15 07:55 (99 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=f41f3f373dd72344c65d801d6381fe83ef3a2c54 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13943 Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com> Date : 2009-08-06 20:15 (108 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124958978600600&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941 Subject : x86 Geode issue Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi> Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (111 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13836 Subject : suspend script fails, related to stdout? Submitter : Tomas M. <tmezzadra@gmail.com> Date : 2009-07-17 21:24 (128 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124785853811667&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13809 Subject : oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected Submitter : Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com> Date : 2009-07-22 13:35 (123 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13733 Subject : 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared Submitter : Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@gmail.com> Date : 2009-07-06 18:32 (139 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124690524027166&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13645 Subject : NULL pointer dereference at (null) (level2_spare_pgt) Submitter : poornima nayak <mpnayak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date : 2009-06-17 17:56 (158 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/17/194 Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14340 Subject : speedstep-ich driver not working in 2.6.31 Submitter : <dave.mueller@gmx.ch> Date : 2009-10-07 08:16 (46 days old) Handled-By : Eric Pielbug <e.a.b.piel@tudelft.nl> Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/54672/ http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/54671/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14253 Subject : Oops in driversbasefirmware_class Submitter : Lars Ericsson <Lars_Ericsson@telia.com> Date : 2009-09-16 20:44 (67 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/16/461 Handled-By : Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt@xprog.eu> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/49914/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14137 Subject : usb console regressions Submitter : Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com> Date : 2009-09-05 21:08 (78 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125218501310512&w=4 Handled-By : Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/45953/ http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/45952/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14017 Subject : _end symbol missing from Symbol.map Submitter : Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Date : 2009-08-13 6:45 (101 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=091e52c3551d3031343df24b573b770b4c6c72b6 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014649102253&w=4 Handled-By : Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014649102253&w=4 For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13615 Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 2009-11-21 14:59 2.6.32-rc8-git1: Reported regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-11-21 15:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 71+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-11-21 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Mikael Pettersson This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256 Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (62 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125351816109264&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 71+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-02-10 19:16 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 71+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 bugzilla-daemon 2009-10-04 20:47 ` [Bug 14256] " bugzilla-daemon 2009-10-09 22:01 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-10-10 1:31 ` Theodore Tso 2009-10-12 13:48 ` Mikael Pettersson 2009-10-10 1:31 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-10-12 13:48 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-10-12 16:19 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-11-05 16:07 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-11-05 16:13 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-11-11 15:27 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-11-11 15:29 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-11-20 15:11 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-11-21 14:27 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-12-08 11:12 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-12-08 11:47 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-12-14 12:40 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-12-14 14:46 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-12-15 9:08 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-12-29 13:18 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-11 21:59 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-11 22:55 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-12 16:03 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-12 17:30 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-12 20:12 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-12 23:25 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-13 0:34 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-18 22:41 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-19 19:56 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-19 19:57 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-19 23:24 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-20 10:40 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-20 13:52 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-20 18:11 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-20 19:10 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-20 19:29 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-20 19:54 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-20 20:09 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-23 22:18 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-24 11:28 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-24 17:13 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-24 18:17 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-24 18:20 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-24 19:27 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-25 1:37 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-25 10:29 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-25 12:07 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-28 17:19 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-28 17:23 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-28 17:24 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-28 17:25 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-01-28 17:55 ` bugzilla-daemon 2010-02-10 19:16 ` bugzilla-daemon 2009-10-01 19:53 2.6.32-rc1-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-10-01 19:56 ` [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-10-04 17:38 ` Mikael Pettersson 2009-10-04 17:38 ` Mikael Pettersson 2009-10-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-10-04 23:04 ` Mikael Pettersson 2009-10-04 23:04 ` Mikael Pettersson 2009-10-09 16:40 ` Mikael Pettersson 2009-10-09 16:40 ` Mikael Pettersson 2009-10-09 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-10-09 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-10-11 22:41 2.6.32-rc4: Reported regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-10-11 23:01 ` [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-10-26 19:26 2.6.32-rc5-git3: Reported regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-11-16 22:58 2.6.32-rc7-git1: Reported regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-11-16 23:01 ` [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-11-16 23:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-11-21 12:37 ` Mikael Pettersson 2009-11-21 12:37 ` Mikael Pettersson 2009-11-21 14:59 2.6.32-rc8-git1: Reported regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-11-21 15:02 ` [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 Rafael J. Wysocki
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.