All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/20] ath9k_hw: ar93xx initial abstraction work
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:44:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100323204401.GA3067@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43e72e891003171853v7458802bgafcf060d75e240a7@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 06:53:06PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> <lrodriguez@atheros.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> > <lrodriguez@atheros.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> >> <lrodriguez@atheros.com> wrote:
> >>> Here's what I have so far, this is rebased on top of Senthil's patches
> >>> for ath9k_htc posted today. Just tested it on my AR9280, it doesn't
> >>> break anything.
> >>
> >> BTW the new ath9k_htc series + this series can be downloaded in one file from:
> >>
> >> http://bombadil.infradead.org/~mcgrof/tmp/all-ar93xx-03-17-v3.patch
> >
> > bleh, I did not use -M here... let me resend with that for the renames.
> 
> On second thought John -- please hold off on merging these new ar93xx
> abstraction patches, we are trying to mathematically prove if ar9002
> register definitions are the same as the ar9003 ones and if so well
> this is all pointless :D

Did this get resolved?

John
-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com			might be all we have.  Be ready.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v2 00/20] ath9k_hw: ar93xx initial abstraction work
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:44:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100323204401.GA3067@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43e72e891003171853v7458802bgafcf060d75e240a7@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 06:53:06PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> <lrodriguez@atheros.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> > <lrodriguez@atheros.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> >> <lrodriguez@atheros.com> wrote:
> >>> Here's what I have so far, this is rebased on top of Senthil's patches
> >>> for ath9k_htc posted today. Just tested it on my AR9280, it doesn't
> >>> break anything.
> >>
> >> BTW the new ath9k_htc series + this series can be downloaded in one file from:
> >>
> >> http://bombadil.infradead.org/~mcgrof/tmp/all-ar93xx-03-17-v3.patch
> >
> > bleh, I did not use -M here... let me resend with that for the renames.
> 
> On second thought John -- please hold off on merging these new ar93xx
> abstraction patches, we are trying to mathematically prove if ar9002
> register definitions are the same as the ar9003 ones and if so well
> this is all pointless :D

Did this get resolved?

John
-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville at tuxdriver.com			might be all we have.  Be ready.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-23 20:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-17 22:27 [PATCH v2 00/20] ath9k_hw: ar93xx initial abstraction work Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:27 ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:27 ` [PATCH v2 01/20] ath9k: start building an abstraction layer for hardware routines Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:27   ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:27 ` [PATCH v2 02/20] ath9k: initial move of ar9002 specific code to its own file Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:27   ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:27 ` [PATCH v2 03/20] ath9k: rename initvals.h to ar9002_initvals.h Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:27   ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:27 ` [PATCH v2 04/20] ath9k_hw: rename getNoiseFloorThresh() to ath9k_hw_getnf_thres() Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:27   ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:27 ` [PATCH v2 05/20] ath9k_hw: move < AR9002 specific calibration stuff to its own file Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:27   ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:27 ` [PATCH v2 06/20] ath9k_hw: move calibration settings to ar9002_calib_settings.c Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:27   ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:28 ` [PATCH v2 07/20] ath9k_hw: consolidate the pci express checks on __ath9k_hw_init() Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:28   ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:28 ` [PATCH v2 08/20] ath9k_hw: move ar9002 bluetooth coexistence code to its own file Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:28   ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:28 ` [PATCH v2 09/20] ath9k_hw: Use a helper for setting phy error masks Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:28   ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:28 ` [PATCH v2 10/20] ath9k_hw: add helpers for writing phy errors counts Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:28   ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:28 ` [PATCH v2 11/20] ath9k_hw: add a helper for phy error counter reads Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:28   ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:28 ` [PATCH v2 12/20] ath9k_hw: add documentation for the TPC register Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:28   ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:28 ` [PATCH v2 13/20] ath9k_hw: remove unused and buggy ath9k_hw_GetMibCycleCountsPct() Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:28   ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:28 ` [PATCH v2 14/20] ath9k_hw: add a helper for retrieving the MIB cycle counters Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:28   ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:28 ` [PATCH v2 15/20] ath9k_hw: provide a helper for clearing the MIB counters Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:28   ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:28 ` [PATCH v2 16/20] ath9k_hw: simplify reseting of the MIB control register Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:28   ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:28 ` [PATCH v2 17/20] ath9k_hw: provide a helper for managing " Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:28   ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:28 ` [PATCH v2 18/20] ath9k_hw: move common defines for ANI into ath/reg.h Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:28   ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:28 ` [PATCH v2 19/20] ath9k_hw: move ar9002 ANI code to its own file Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:28   ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:28 ` [PATCH v2 20/20] ath9k_hw: remove wrapper ath9k_hw_write_regs() Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:28   ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:32 ` [PATCH v2 00/20] ath9k_hw: ar93xx initial abstraction work Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:32   ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:50   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-17 22:50     ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-18  1:53     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-18  1:53       ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-23 20:44       ` John W. Linville [this message]
2010-03-23 20:44         ` John W. Linville
2010-03-23 20:53         ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-23 20:53           ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100323204401.GA3067@tuxdriver.com \
    --to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.