All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [lm-sensors] Nuvoton W83667HG-B support request
@ 2010-06-30 14:19 Ethan Lawrence
  2010-06-30 17:27 ` Guenter Roeck
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ethan Lawrence @ 2010-06-30 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 646 bytes --]

Hello,
It seems my new motherbord has 'Nuvoton W83667HG-B Super IO Sensors' 
chip which is not supported yet.
Device wiki says that there is a driver (w83627ehf) for W83667HG chip and support for W83667HG-B will probably be added to it.

Could you please add support for the new chip?

Previous support requests for this chip:
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2009-November/027193.html
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2010-February/027842.html
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2010-May/028545.html
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2010-June/028710.html


Thanks!
---
Ethan


      

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1519 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 153 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [lm-sensors] Nuvoton W83667HG-B support request
  2010-06-30 14:19 [lm-sensors] Nuvoton W83667HG-B support request Ethan Lawrence
@ 2010-06-30 17:27 ` Guenter Roeck
  2010-06-30 19:45 ` Jean Delvare
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2010-06-30 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

I don't have a datasheet, but from looking into the "Open Hardware Monitor" source
it seems that W83667HG and W83667HG-B are identical from a programming perspective.
Only difference is the chip ID, which should be 0xb350 instead of 0xa510.

So you should be able to use the existing driver by setting the force_id module parameter
to 0xa510. If that works, and there are no objections, I can create a patch to auto-detect
the chip.

Guenter

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 10:19:29AM -0400, Ethan Lawrence wrote:
> Hello,
> It seems my new motherbord has 'Nuvoton W83667HG-B Super IO Sensors' chip which is not supported yet.
> Device wiki says that there is a driver (w83627ehf) for W83667HG<http://www.nuvoton.com.tw/hq/enu/ProductAndSales/ProductLines/ComputerIC/SuperIO/LPCSuperIOforDesktopAndServer/W83667HG.htm> chip and support for W83667HG-B will probably be added to it.
> 
> Could you please add support for the new chip?
> 
> Previous support requests for this chip:
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2009-November/027193.html
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2010-February/027842.html
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2010-May/028545.html
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2010-June/028710.html
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> ---
> Ethan
> 

> _______________________________________________
> lm-sensors mailing list
> lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors


_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [lm-sensors] Nuvoton W83667HG-B support request
  2010-06-30 14:19 [lm-sensors] Nuvoton W83667HG-B support request Ethan Lawrence
  2010-06-30 17:27 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2010-06-30 19:45 ` Jean Delvare
  2010-07-01  3:01 ` Guenter Roeck
  2010-07-01  6:05 ` Jean Delvare
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2010-06-30 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

Hi Guenter,

Please don't top-post.

On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:27:46 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> I don't have a datasheet, but from looking into the "Open Hardware Monitor" source
> it seems that W83667HG and W83667HG-B are identical from a programming perspective.
> Only difference is the chip ID, which should be 0xb350 instead of 0xa510.

I have a datasheet, which unfortunately I can't share. I never had the
time to read it, but as far as I know, the monitoring part is
compatible with the -A variant, while the automatic fan speed control
isn't. So a safe approach would be to only enable monitoring and
disabling the fan speed control interface.

> So you should be able to use the existing driver by setting the force_id module parameter
> to 0xa510. If that works, and there are no objections, I can create a patch to auto-detect
> the chip.
> 
> Guenter
> 
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 10:19:29AM -0400, Ethan Lawrence wrote:
> > Hello,
> > It seems my new motherbord has 'Nuvoton W83667HG-B Super IO Sensors' chip which is not supported yet.
> > Device wiki says that there is a driver (w83627ehf) for W83667HG<http://www.nuvoton.com.tw/hq/enu/ProductAndSales/ProductLines/ComputerIC/SuperIO/LPCSuperIOforDesktopAndServer/W83667HG.htm> chip and support for W83667HG-B will probably be added to it.
> > 
> > Could you please add support for the new chip?
> > 
> > Previous support requests for this chip:
> > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2009-November/027193.html
> > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2010-February/027842.html
> > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2010-May/028545.html
> > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2010-June/028710.html

No need to copy and paste the wiki, we can read it directly ;)

I've added your request to the wiki.

-- 
Jean Delvare

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [lm-sensors] Nuvoton W83667HG-B support request
  2010-06-30 14:19 [lm-sensors] Nuvoton W83667HG-B support request Ethan Lawrence
  2010-06-30 17:27 ` Guenter Roeck
  2010-06-30 19:45 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2010-07-01  3:01 ` Guenter Roeck
  2010-07-01  6:05 ` Jean Delvare
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2010-07-01  3:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 03:45:33PM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
> 
> Please don't top-post.
> 
Sorry

> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:27:46 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > I don't have a datasheet, but from looking into the "Open Hardware Monitor" source
> > it seems that W83667HG and W83667HG-B are identical from a programming perspective.
> > Only difference is the chip ID, which should be 0xb350 instead of 0xa510.
> 
> I have a datasheet, which unfortunately I can't share. I never had the
> time to read it, but as far as I know, the monitoring part is
> compatible with the -A variant, while the automatic fan speed control
> isn't. So a safe approach would be to only enable monitoring and
> disabling the fan speed control interface.
> 
The folks at Nuvoton are actually quite nice and sent me a copy.
I browsed through it, specifically the fan control section, but I don't see
what might be different to the current implementation. Of course it would help
to have a copy of the W83667HG datasheet to be able to compare .. I'll see
if I can get that one as well.

Guenter

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [lm-sensors] Nuvoton W83667HG-B support request
  2010-06-30 14:19 [lm-sensors] Nuvoton W83667HG-B support request Ethan Lawrence
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-01  3:01 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2010-07-01  6:05 ` Jean Delvare
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2010-07-01  6:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:01:25 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 03:45:33PM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Hi Guenter,
> > 
> > Please don't top-post.
> > 
> Sorry
> 
> > On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:27:46 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > I don't have a datasheet, but from looking into the "Open Hardware Monitor" source
> > > it seems that W83667HG and W83667HG-B are identical from a programming perspective.
> > > Only difference is the chip ID, which should be 0xb350 instead of 0xa510.
> > 
> > I have a datasheet, which unfortunately I can't share. I never had the
> > time to read it, but as far as I know, the monitoring part is
> > compatible with the -A variant, while the automatic fan speed control
> > isn't. So a safe approach would be to only enable monitoring and
> > disabling the fan speed control interface.
> > 
> The folks at Nuvoton are actually quite nice and sent me a copy.
> I browsed through it, specifically the fan control section, but I don't see
> what might be different to the current implementation. Of course it would help
> to have a copy of the W83667HG datasheet to be able to compare .. I'll see
> if I can get that one as well.

I can send you an old version of that one, it used to be publicly
available on Nuvoton's web site.

-- 
Jean Delvare

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-07-01  6:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-06-30 14:19 [lm-sensors] Nuvoton W83667HG-B support request Ethan Lawrence
2010-06-30 17:27 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-06-30 19:45 ` Jean Delvare
2010-07-01  3:01 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-07-01  6:05 ` Jean Delvare

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.