All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC][PATCH 1/2][memcg] moving memcg's node info array to virtually contiguous array
@ 2010-07-21 10:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki @ 2010-07-21 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm; +Cc: balbir, nishimura, linux-kernel

These are just a _toy_ level patches yet. My final purpose is to use indexed array
for mem_cgroup itself, it has IDs.

Background:
  memory cgroup uses struct page_cgroup for tracking all used pages. It's defined as
==
struct page_cgroup {
        unsigned long flags;
        struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup;
        struct page *page;
        struct list_head lru;           /* per cgroup LRU list */
};
==
  and this increase the cost of per-page-objects dramatically. Now, we have
  troubles on this object.
  1.  Recently, a blkio-tracking guy wants to add "blockio-cgroup" information
      to page_cgroup. But our concern is extra 8bytes per page.
  2.  At tracking dirty page status etc...we need some trick for safe access
      to page_cgroup and memcgroup's information. For example, a small seqlock.

Now, each memory cgroup has its own ID (0-65535). So, if we can replace
8byte of pointer "pc->mem_cgroup" with an ID, which is 2 bytes, we may able
to have another room. (Moreover, I think we can reduce the number of IDs...)

This patch is a trial for implement a virually-indexed on-demand array and
an example of usage. Any commetns are welcome.

==
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

This virt-array allocates a virtally contiguous array via get_vm_area()
and allows object allocation per an element of array.
Physical pages are used only for used items in the array.

 - At first, the user has to create an array by create_virt_array().
 - At using an element, virt_array_alloc_index(index) should be called.
 - At freeing an element, virt_array_free_index(index) should be called.
 - At destroying, destroy_virt_array() should be called.

Item used/unused status is controlled by bitmap and back-end physical
pages are automatically allocated/freed. This is useful when you
want to access objects by index in light weight. For example,

	create_virt_array(va);
	struct your_struct *objmap = va->address;
	Then, you can access your objects by objmap[i].

In usual case, holding reference by index rather than pointer can save memory.
But index -> object lookup cost cannot be negligible. In such case,
this virt-array may be helpful. Ah yes, if lookup performance is not important,
using radix-tree will be better (from TLB point of view). This virty-array
may consume VMALLOC area too much. and alloc/free routine is very slow.

Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 include/linux/virt-array.h |   22 ++++
 lib/Makefile               |    2 
 lib/virt-array.c           |  216 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 239 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: mmotm-2.6.35-0719/lib/Makefile
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.35-0719.orig/lib/Makefile
+++ mmotm-2.6.35-0719/lib/Makefile
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ lib-y := ctype.o string.o vsprintf.o cmd
 	 proportions.o prio_heap.o ratelimit.o show_mem.o \
 	 is_single_threaded.o plist.o decompress.o flex_array.o
 
-lib-$(CONFIG_MMU) += ioremap.o
+lib-$(CONFIG_MMU) += ioremap.o virt-array.o
 lib-$(CONFIG_SMP) += cpumask.o
 
 lib-y	+= kobject.o kref.o klist.o
Index: mmotm-2.6.35-0719/lib/virt-array.c
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ mmotm-2.6.35-0719/lib/virt-array.c
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
+#include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/virt-array.h>
+#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
+
+
+/*
+ * Why define this here is because this function should be
+ * defined by user for getting better code. This generic one is slow
+ * because the compiler cannot know what the "size" is.
+ */
+static unsigned long idx_to_addr(struct virt_array *v, int idx)
+{
+	return (unsigned long)v->vm_area->addr + idx * v->size;
+}
+
+static unsigned long addr_index(struct virt_array *v, unsigned long addr)
+{
+	return (addr - (unsigned long)v->vm_area->addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+}
+
+static int idx_used(const struct virt_array *v, int idx)
+{
+	return test_bit(idx, v->map);
+}
+
+static void unmap_free_page(struct virt_array *v, unsigned long page)
+{
+	struct page *pg;
+	unsigned long page_idx;
+
+	page_idx = addr_index(v, page);
+	/* alloc_idx's undo routine may find !pg */
+	pg = radix_tree_delete(&v->phys_pages, page_idx);
+	if (!pg)
+		return;
+	unmap_kernel_range(page, PAGE_SIZE);
+	__free_page(pg);
+
+}
+
+static void __free_head_page(struct virt_array *v, int idx)
+{
+	int i;
+	unsigned long page;
+
+	page = idx_to_addr(v, idx) & PAGE_MASK;
+
+	/* check backword */
+	for (i = idx - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
+		unsigned long address = idx_to_addr(v, i) + v->size - 1;
+		if ((address & PAGE_MASK) != page)
+			break;
+		/* A used object shares this page ? */
+		if (idx_used(v, i))
+			return;
+	}
+	unmap_free_page(v, page);
+}
+
+
+static void __free_middle_page(struct virt_array *v, int idx)
+{
+	unsigned long page, end_page;
+
+	page = (idx_to_addr(v, idx)) & PAGE_MASK;
+	end_page = (idx_to_addr(v, idx) + v->size) & PAGE_MASK;
+	if (end_page - page <= PAGE_SIZE)
+		return;
+	/* free all pages between head and tail */
+	for (page += PAGE_SIZE; page != end_page; page += PAGE_SIZE)
+		unmap_free_page(v, page);
+}
+
+
+static void __free_tail_page(struct virt_array *v, int idx)
+{
+	int i;
+	unsigned long page;
+
+	page = (idx_to_addr(v, idx) + v->size) & PAGE_MASK;
+	/* check forword */
+	for (i = idx + 1; i < v->nelem ; i++) {
+		unsigned long address = idx_to_addr(v, i);
+		if ((address & PAGE_MASK) != page)
+			break;
+		/* A used object shares this page ? */
+		if (idx_used(v, i))
+			return;
+	}
+	/* we can free this page */
+	unmap_free_page(v, page);
+}
+
+static void __free_this_page(struct virt_array *v, int idx, unsigned long page)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	/* check backword */
+	for (i = idx - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
+		unsigned long address = idx_to_addr(v, i) + v->size - 1;
+		if ((address & PAGE_MASK) != page)
+			break;
+		/* A used object shares this page ? */
+		if (idx_used(v, i))
+			return;
+	}
+	/* check forward */
+	for (i = idx + 1; i < v->nelem; i++) {
+		unsigned long address = idx_to_addr(v, i);
+		if ((address & PAGE_MASK) != page)
+			break;
+		/* A used object shares this page ? */
+		if (idx_used(v, i))
+			return;
+	}
+	/* we can free this page */
+	unmap_free_page(v, page);
+}
+
+static void __free_unmap_entry(struct virt_array *v, int idx)
+{
+	unsigned long address, end;
+
+	address = idx_to_addr(v, idx);
+	end = address + v->size;
+	if ((address & PAGE_MASK) == (end & PAGE_MASK)) {
+		__free_this_page(v, idx, address & PAGE_MASK);
+	} else {
+		__free_head_page(v, idx);
+		__free_middle_page(v, idx);
+		__free_tail_page(v, idx);
+	}
+}
+
+void free_varray_item(struct virt_array *v, int idx)
+{
+	mutex_lock(&v->mutex);
+	__free_unmap_entry(v, idx);
+	mutex_unlock(&v->mutex);
+}
+
+void *alloc_varray_item(struct virt_array *v, int idx)
+{
+	unsigned long obj, tmp, start, end, addr_idx;
+	struct page *pg[1];
+	void *ret = ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
+
+	mutex_lock(&v->mutex);
+	if (idx_used(v, idx))
+		goto out;
+
+	obj = idx_to_addr(v, idx);
+	start = obj & PAGE_MASK;
+	end = PAGE_ALIGN(obj + v->size);
+
+	for (tmp = start; tmp < end; tmp+=PAGE_SIZE) {
+		addr_idx = addr_index(v, tmp);
+		pg[0] = radix_tree_lookup(&v->phys_pages, addr_idx);
+		if (pg[0])
+			continue;
+		pg[0] = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (map_kernel_range_noflush(tmp, PAGE_SIZE,
+			PAGE_KERNEL, pg) == -ENOMEM) {
+				__free_page(pg[0]);
+				goto out_unmap;
+		}
+
+		radix_tree_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (radix_tree_insert(&va->phys_pages, addr_idx, pg[0])) {
+			BUG();
+		}
+		radix_tree_preload_end();
+	}
+	flush_cache_vmap(start, end);
+	ret = (void *)obj;
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&v->mutex);
+	return ret;
+out_unmap:
+	ret = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+	__free_unmap_entry(v, idx);
+	goto out;
+}
+
+void *create_varray(struct virt_array *v,int size, int nelem)
+{
+	unsigned long total = size * nelem;
+	unsigned long bits;
+
+	bits = ((nelem/BITS_PER_LONG)+1) * sizeof(long);
+	v->map = kzalloc(bits, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!v->map)
+		return NULL;
+	total = PAGE_ALIGN(total);
+	v->vm_area = get_vm_area(total, 0);
+	if (!v->vm_area) {
+		kfree(v->map);
+		return NULL;
+	}
+
+	v->size = size;
+	v->nelem = nelem;
+	INIT_RADIX_TREE(&v->phys_pages, GFP_KERNEL);
+	mutex_init(&v->mutex);
+	return v->vm_area->addr;
+}
+
+void destroy_varray(struct virt_array *v)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for_each_set_bit(i, v->map, v->nelem)
+		__free_unmap_entry(v, i);
+	kfree(v->map);
+	free_vm_area(v->vm_area);
+	return;
+}
+
+int varray_find_free_index(struct virt_array *v)
+{
+	return find_first_zero_bit(v->map, v->nelem);
+}
+
Index: mmotm-2.6.35-0719/include/linux/virt-array.h
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ mmotm-2.6.35-0719/include/linux/virt-array.h
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+#ifndef __LINUX_VIRTARRAY_H
+#define __LINUX_VIRTARRAY_H
+
+#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
+#include <linux/radix-tree.h>
+
+struct virt_array {
+	struct vm_struct *vm_area;
+	int size;
+	int nelem;
+	struct mutex mutex;
+	struct radix_tree_root phys_pages;
+	unsigned long *map;
+};
+
+void *create_varray(struct virt_array *va, int size, int nelems);
+void *alloc_varray_item(struct virt_array *va, int index);
+void free_varray_item(struct virt_array *va, int index);
+void destroy_varray(struct virt_array *va);
+int varray_find_free_index(struct virt_array *va);
+
+#endif


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [RFC][PATCH 1/2][memcg] moving memcg's node info array to virtually contiguous array
@ 2010-07-21 10:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki @ 2010-07-21 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm; +Cc: balbir, nishimura, linux-kernel

These are just a _toy_ level patches yet. My final purpose is to use indexed array
for mem_cgroup itself, it has IDs.

Background:
  memory cgroup uses struct page_cgroup for tracking all used pages. It's defined as
==
struct page_cgroup {
        unsigned long flags;
        struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup;
        struct page *page;
        struct list_head lru;           /* per cgroup LRU list */
};
==
  and this increase the cost of per-page-objects dramatically. Now, we have
  troubles on this object.
  1.  Recently, a blkio-tracking guy wants to add "blockio-cgroup" information
      to page_cgroup. But our concern is extra 8bytes per page.
  2.  At tracking dirty page status etc...we need some trick for safe access
      to page_cgroup and memcgroup's information. For example, a small seqlock.

Now, each memory cgroup has its own ID (0-65535). So, if we can replace
8byte of pointer "pc->mem_cgroup" with an ID, which is 2 bytes, we may able
to have another room. (Moreover, I think we can reduce the number of IDs...)

This patch is a trial for implement a virually-indexed on-demand array and
an example of usage. Any commetns are welcome.

==
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

This virt-array allocates a virtally contiguous array via get_vm_area()
and allows object allocation per an element of array.
Physical pages are used only for used items in the array.

 - At first, the user has to create an array by create_virt_array().
 - At using an element, virt_array_alloc_index(index) should be called.
 - At freeing an element, virt_array_free_index(index) should be called.
 - At destroying, destroy_virt_array() should be called.

Item used/unused status is controlled by bitmap and back-end physical
pages are automatically allocated/freed. This is useful when you
want to access objects by index in light weight. For example,

	create_virt_array(va);
	struct your_struct *objmap = va->address;
	Then, you can access your objects by objmap[i].

In usual case, holding reference by index rather than pointer can save memory.
But index -> object lookup cost cannot be negligible. In such case,
this virt-array may be helpful. Ah yes, if lookup performance is not important,
using radix-tree will be better (from TLB point of view). This virty-array
may consume VMALLOC area too much. and alloc/free routine is very slow.

Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 include/linux/virt-array.h |   22 ++++
 lib/Makefile               |    2 
 lib/virt-array.c           |  216 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 239 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: mmotm-2.6.35-0719/lib/Makefile
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.35-0719.orig/lib/Makefile
+++ mmotm-2.6.35-0719/lib/Makefile
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ lib-y := ctype.o string.o vsprintf.o cmd
 	 proportions.o prio_heap.o ratelimit.o show_mem.o \
 	 is_single_threaded.o plist.o decompress.o flex_array.o
 
-lib-$(CONFIG_MMU) += ioremap.o
+lib-$(CONFIG_MMU) += ioremap.o virt-array.o
 lib-$(CONFIG_SMP) += cpumask.o
 
 lib-y	+= kobject.o kref.o klist.o
Index: mmotm-2.6.35-0719/lib/virt-array.c
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ mmotm-2.6.35-0719/lib/virt-array.c
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
+#include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/virt-array.h>
+#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
+
+
+/*
+ * Why define this here is because this function should be
+ * defined by user for getting better code. This generic one is slow
+ * because the compiler cannot know what the "size" is.
+ */
+static unsigned long idx_to_addr(struct virt_array *v, int idx)
+{
+	return (unsigned long)v->vm_area->addr + idx * v->size;
+}
+
+static unsigned long addr_index(struct virt_array *v, unsigned long addr)
+{
+	return (addr - (unsigned long)v->vm_area->addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+}
+
+static int idx_used(const struct virt_array *v, int idx)
+{
+	return test_bit(idx, v->map);
+}
+
+static void unmap_free_page(struct virt_array *v, unsigned long page)
+{
+	struct page *pg;
+	unsigned long page_idx;
+
+	page_idx = addr_index(v, page);
+	/* alloc_idx's undo routine may find !pg */
+	pg = radix_tree_delete(&v->phys_pages, page_idx);
+	if (!pg)
+		return;
+	unmap_kernel_range(page, PAGE_SIZE);
+	__free_page(pg);
+
+}
+
+static void __free_head_page(struct virt_array *v, int idx)
+{
+	int i;
+	unsigned long page;
+
+	page = idx_to_addr(v, idx) & PAGE_MASK;
+
+	/* check backword */
+	for (i = idx - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
+		unsigned long address = idx_to_addr(v, i) + v->size - 1;
+		if ((address & PAGE_MASK) != page)
+			break;
+		/* A used object shares this page ? */
+		if (idx_used(v, i))
+			return;
+	}
+	unmap_free_page(v, page);
+}
+
+
+static void __free_middle_page(struct virt_array *v, int idx)
+{
+	unsigned long page, end_page;
+
+	page = (idx_to_addr(v, idx)) & PAGE_MASK;
+	end_page = (idx_to_addr(v, idx) + v->size) & PAGE_MASK;
+	if (end_page - page <= PAGE_SIZE)
+		return;
+	/* free all pages between head and tail */
+	for (page += PAGE_SIZE; page != end_page; page += PAGE_SIZE)
+		unmap_free_page(v, page);
+}
+
+
+static void __free_tail_page(struct virt_array *v, int idx)
+{
+	int i;
+	unsigned long page;
+
+	page = (idx_to_addr(v, idx) + v->size) & PAGE_MASK;
+	/* check forword */
+	for (i = idx + 1; i < v->nelem ; i++) {
+		unsigned long address = idx_to_addr(v, i);
+		if ((address & PAGE_MASK) != page)
+			break;
+		/* A used object shares this page ? */
+		if (idx_used(v, i))
+			return;
+	}
+	/* we can free this page */
+	unmap_free_page(v, page);
+}
+
+static void __free_this_page(struct virt_array *v, int idx, unsigned long page)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	/* check backword */
+	for (i = idx - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
+		unsigned long address = idx_to_addr(v, i) + v->size - 1;
+		if ((address & PAGE_MASK) != page)
+			break;
+		/* A used object shares this page ? */
+		if (idx_used(v, i))
+			return;
+	}
+	/* check forward */
+	for (i = idx + 1; i < v->nelem; i++) {
+		unsigned long address = idx_to_addr(v, i);
+		if ((address & PAGE_MASK) != page)
+			break;
+		/* A used object shares this page ? */
+		if (idx_used(v, i))
+			return;
+	}
+	/* we can free this page */
+	unmap_free_page(v, page);
+}
+
+static void __free_unmap_entry(struct virt_array *v, int idx)
+{
+	unsigned long address, end;
+
+	address = idx_to_addr(v, idx);
+	end = address + v->size;
+	if ((address & PAGE_MASK) == (end & PAGE_MASK)) {
+		__free_this_page(v, idx, address & PAGE_MASK);
+	} else {
+		__free_head_page(v, idx);
+		__free_middle_page(v, idx);
+		__free_tail_page(v, idx);
+	}
+}
+
+void free_varray_item(struct virt_array *v, int idx)
+{
+	mutex_lock(&v->mutex);
+	__free_unmap_entry(v, idx);
+	mutex_unlock(&v->mutex);
+}
+
+void *alloc_varray_item(struct virt_array *v, int idx)
+{
+	unsigned long obj, tmp, start, end, addr_idx;
+	struct page *pg[1];
+	void *ret = ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
+
+	mutex_lock(&v->mutex);
+	if (idx_used(v, idx))
+		goto out;
+
+	obj = idx_to_addr(v, idx);
+	start = obj & PAGE_MASK;
+	end = PAGE_ALIGN(obj + v->size);
+
+	for (tmp = start; tmp < end; tmp+=PAGE_SIZE) {
+		addr_idx = addr_index(v, tmp);
+		pg[0] = radix_tree_lookup(&v->phys_pages, addr_idx);
+		if (pg[0])
+			continue;
+		pg[0] = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (map_kernel_range_noflush(tmp, PAGE_SIZE,
+			PAGE_KERNEL, pg) == -ENOMEM) {
+				__free_page(pg[0]);
+				goto out_unmap;
+		}
+
+		radix_tree_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (radix_tree_insert(&va->phys_pages, addr_idx, pg[0])) {
+			BUG();
+		}
+		radix_tree_preload_end();
+	}
+	flush_cache_vmap(start, end);
+	ret = (void *)obj;
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&v->mutex);
+	return ret;
+out_unmap:
+	ret = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+	__free_unmap_entry(v, idx);
+	goto out;
+}
+
+void *create_varray(struct virt_array *v,int size, int nelem)
+{
+	unsigned long total = size * nelem;
+	unsigned long bits;
+
+	bits = ((nelem/BITS_PER_LONG)+1) * sizeof(long);
+	v->map = kzalloc(bits, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!v->map)
+		return NULL;
+	total = PAGE_ALIGN(total);
+	v->vm_area = get_vm_area(total, 0);
+	if (!v->vm_area) {
+		kfree(v->map);
+		return NULL;
+	}
+
+	v->size = size;
+	v->nelem = nelem;
+	INIT_RADIX_TREE(&v->phys_pages, GFP_KERNEL);
+	mutex_init(&v->mutex);
+	return v->vm_area->addr;
+}
+
+void destroy_varray(struct virt_array *v)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for_each_set_bit(i, v->map, v->nelem)
+		__free_unmap_entry(v, i);
+	kfree(v->map);
+	free_vm_area(v->vm_area);
+	return;
+}
+
+int varray_find_free_index(struct virt_array *v)
+{
+	return find_first_zero_bit(v->map, v->nelem);
+}
+
Index: mmotm-2.6.35-0719/include/linux/virt-array.h
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ mmotm-2.6.35-0719/include/linux/virt-array.h
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+#ifndef __LINUX_VIRTARRAY_H
+#define __LINUX_VIRTARRAY_H
+
+#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
+#include <linux/radix-tree.h>
+
+struct virt_array {
+	struct vm_struct *vm_area;
+	int size;
+	int nelem;
+	struct mutex mutex;
+	struct radix_tree_root phys_pages;
+	unsigned long *map;
+};
+
+void *create_varray(struct virt_array *va, int size, int nelems);
+void *alloc_varray_item(struct virt_array *va, int index);
+void free_varray_item(struct virt_array *va, int index);
+void destroy_varray(struct virt_array *va);
+int varray_find_free_index(struct virt_array *va);
+
+#endif

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [RFC][PATCH 2/2][memcg] use virt-array for memcg.
  2010-07-21 10:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
@ 2010-07-21 11:00   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki @ 2010-07-21 11:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki; +Cc: linux-mm, balbir, nishimura, linux-kernel

This makes memcg to depend on CONFIG_MMU.
==
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

Using virt_array for memcg's node information.
Now, memcg allocates an array of pointer in the lengh of MAXNUMNODES
to hold pointers for per-node information.

This has 2 bad points
  - struct mem_cgroup can be very big.
  - need to access a pointer table for lookup zoneinfo.

This patch replaces memcg's nodeinfo with virt-array and do
direct access. With my config on x86-64, struct mem_cgroup's
size is changed from 4368->352.

Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 init/Kconfig    |    2 +-
 mm/memcontrol.c |   51 ++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

Index: mmotm-2.6.35-0719/init/Kconfig
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.35-0719.orig/init/Kconfig
+++ mmotm-2.6.35-0719/init/Kconfig
@@ -555,7 +555,7 @@ config RESOURCE_COUNTERS
 
 config CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
 	bool "Memory Resource Controller for Control Groups"
-	depends on CGROUPS && RESOURCE_COUNTERS
+	depends on CGROUPS && RESOURCE_COUNTERS && MMU
 	select MM_OWNER
 	help
 	  Provides a memory resource controller that manages both anonymous
Index: mmotm-2.6.35-0719/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.35-0719.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ mmotm-2.6.35-0719/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
 #include <linux/page_cgroup.h>
 #include <linux/cpu.h>
 #include <linux/oom.h>
+#include <linux/virt-array.h>
 #include "internal.h"
 
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
@@ -119,11 +120,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup_per_zone {
 
 struct mem_cgroup_per_node {
 	struct mem_cgroup_per_zone zoneinfo[MAX_NR_ZONES];
-};
-
-struct mem_cgroup_lru_info {
-	struct mem_cgroup_per_node *nodeinfo[MAX_NUMNODES];
-};
+} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
 
 /*
  * Cgroups above their limits are maintained in a RB-Tree, independent of
@@ -205,7 +202,8 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
 	 * Per cgroup active and inactive list, similar to the
 	 * per zone LRU lists.
 	 */
-	struct mem_cgroup_lru_info info;
+	struct mem_cgroup_per_node *nodes;
+	struct virt_array node_array;
 
 	/*
 	  protect against reclaim related member.
@@ -344,7 +342,7 @@ static void drain_all_stock_async(void);
 static struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *
 mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int nid, int zid)
 {
-	return &mem->info.nodeinfo[nid]->zoneinfo[zid];
+	return &mem->nodes[nid].zoneinfo[zid];
 }
 
 struct cgroup_subsys_state *mem_cgroup_css(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
@@ -3944,27 +3942,14 @@ static int register_memsw_files(struct c
 }
 #endif
 
-static int alloc_mem_cgroup_per_zone_info(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int node)
+static int init_mem_cgroup_node_info(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int node)
 {
 	struct mem_cgroup_per_node *pn;
 	struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
 	enum lru_list l;
-	int zone, tmp = node;
-	/*
-	 * This routine is called against possible nodes.
-	 * But it's BUG to call kmalloc() against offline node.
-	 *
-	 * TODO: this routine can waste much memory for nodes which will
-	 *       never be onlined. It's better to use memory hotplug callback
-	 *       function.
-	 */
-	if (!node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY))
-		tmp = -1;
-	pn = kmalloc_node(sizeof(*pn), GFP_KERNEL, tmp);
-	if (!pn)
-		return 1;
+	int zone;
 
-	mem->info.nodeinfo[node] = pn;
+	pn = mem->nodes + node;
 	memset(pn, 0, sizeof(*pn));
 
 	for (zone = 0; zone < MAX_NR_ZONES; zone++) {
@@ -3978,11 +3963,6 @@ static int alloc_mem_cgroup_per_zone_inf
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void free_mem_cgroup_per_zone_info(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int node)
-{
-	kfree(mem->info.nodeinfo[node]);
-}
-
 static struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_alloc(void)
 {
 	struct mem_cgroup *mem;
@@ -4022,13 +4002,10 @@ static struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_all
 
 static void __mem_cgroup_free(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
 {
-	int node;
-
 	mem_cgroup_remove_from_trees(mem);
 	free_css_id(&mem_cgroup_subsys, &mem->css);
 
-	for_each_node_state(node, N_POSSIBLE)
-		free_mem_cgroup_per_zone_info(mem, node);
+	destroy_varray(&mem->node_array);
 
 	free_percpu(mem->stat);
 	if (sizeof(struct mem_cgroup) < PAGE_SIZE)
@@ -4115,10 +4092,14 @@ mem_cgroup_create(struct cgroup_subsys *
 	if (!mem)
 		return ERR_PTR(error);
 
-	for_each_node_state(node, N_POSSIBLE)
-		if (alloc_mem_cgroup_per_zone_info(mem, node))
-			goto free_out;
+	mem->nodes = create_varray(&mem->node_array,
+			sizeof(struct mem_cgroup_per_node), MAX_NUMNODES);
 
+	for_each_node_state(node, N_POSSIBLE) {
+		if (!alloc_varray_item(&mem->node_array, node))
+			goto free_out;
+		init_mem_cgroup_node_info(mem, node);
+	}
 	/* root ? */
 	if (cont->parent == NULL) {
 		int cpu;


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [RFC][PATCH 2/2][memcg] use virt-array for memcg.
@ 2010-07-21 11:00   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki @ 2010-07-21 11:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki; +Cc: linux-mm, balbir, nishimura, linux-kernel

This makes memcg to depend on CONFIG_MMU.
==
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

Using virt_array for memcg's node information.
Now, memcg allocates an array of pointer in the lengh of MAXNUMNODES
to hold pointers for per-node information.

This has 2 bad points
  - struct mem_cgroup can be very big.
  - need to access a pointer table for lookup zoneinfo.

This patch replaces memcg's nodeinfo with virt-array and do
direct access. With my config on x86-64, struct mem_cgroup's
size is changed from 4368->352.

Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 init/Kconfig    |    2 +-
 mm/memcontrol.c |   51 ++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

Index: mmotm-2.6.35-0719/init/Kconfig
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.35-0719.orig/init/Kconfig
+++ mmotm-2.6.35-0719/init/Kconfig
@@ -555,7 +555,7 @@ config RESOURCE_COUNTERS
 
 config CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
 	bool "Memory Resource Controller for Control Groups"
-	depends on CGROUPS && RESOURCE_COUNTERS
+	depends on CGROUPS && RESOURCE_COUNTERS && MMU
 	select MM_OWNER
 	help
 	  Provides a memory resource controller that manages both anonymous
Index: mmotm-2.6.35-0719/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.35-0719.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ mmotm-2.6.35-0719/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
 #include <linux/page_cgroup.h>
 #include <linux/cpu.h>
 #include <linux/oom.h>
+#include <linux/virt-array.h>
 #include "internal.h"
 
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
@@ -119,11 +120,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup_per_zone {
 
 struct mem_cgroup_per_node {
 	struct mem_cgroup_per_zone zoneinfo[MAX_NR_ZONES];
-};
-
-struct mem_cgroup_lru_info {
-	struct mem_cgroup_per_node *nodeinfo[MAX_NUMNODES];
-};
+} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
 
 /*
  * Cgroups above their limits are maintained in a RB-Tree, independent of
@@ -205,7 +202,8 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
 	 * Per cgroup active and inactive list, similar to the
 	 * per zone LRU lists.
 	 */
-	struct mem_cgroup_lru_info info;
+	struct mem_cgroup_per_node *nodes;
+	struct virt_array node_array;
 
 	/*
 	  protect against reclaim related member.
@@ -344,7 +342,7 @@ static void drain_all_stock_async(void);
 static struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *
 mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int nid, int zid)
 {
-	return &mem->info.nodeinfo[nid]->zoneinfo[zid];
+	return &mem->nodes[nid].zoneinfo[zid];
 }
 
 struct cgroup_subsys_state *mem_cgroup_css(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
@@ -3944,27 +3942,14 @@ static int register_memsw_files(struct c
 }
 #endif
 
-static int alloc_mem_cgroup_per_zone_info(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int node)
+static int init_mem_cgroup_node_info(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int node)
 {
 	struct mem_cgroup_per_node *pn;
 	struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
 	enum lru_list l;
-	int zone, tmp = node;
-	/*
-	 * This routine is called against possible nodes.
-	 * But it's BUG to call kmalloc() against offline node.
-	 *
-	 * TODO: this routine can waste much memory for nodes which will
-	 *       never be onlined. It's better to use memory hotplug callback
-	 *       function.
-	 */
-	if (!node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY))
-		tmp = -1;
-	pn = kmalloc_node(sizeof(*pn), GFP_KERNEL, tmp);
-	if (!pn)
-		return 1;
+	int zone;
 
-	mem->info.nodeinfo[node] = pn;
+	pn = mem->nodes + node;
 	memset(pn, 0, sizeof(*pn));
 
 	for (zone = 0; zone < MAX_NR_ZONES; zone++) {
@@ -3978,11 +3963,6 @@ static int alloc_mem_cgroup_per_zone_inf
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void free_mem_cgroup_per_zone_info(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int node)
-{
-	kfree(mem->info.nodeinfo[node]);
-}
-
 static struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_alloc(void)
 {
 	struct mem_cgroup *mem;
@@ -4022,13 +4002,10 @@ static struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_all
 
 static void __mem_cgroup_free(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
 {
-	int node;
-
 	mem_cgroup_remove_from_trees(mem);
 	free_css_id(&mem_cgroup_subsys, &mem->css);
 
-	for_each_node_state(node, N_POSSIBLE)
-		free_mem_cgroup_per_zone_info(mem, node);
+	destroy_varray(&mem->node_array);
 
 	free_percpu(mem->stat);
 	if (sizeof(struct mem_cgroup) < PAGE_SIZE)
@@ -4115,10 +4092,14 @@ mem_cgroup_create(struct cgroup_subsys *
 	if (!mem)
 		return ERR_PTR(error);
 
-	for_each_node_state(node, N_POSSIBLE)
-		if (alloc_mem_cgroup_per_zone_info(mem, node))
-			goto free_out;
+	mem->nodes = create_varray(&mem->node_array,
+			sizeof(struct mem_cgroup_per_node), MAX_NUMNODES);
 
+	for_each_node_state(node, N_POSSIBLE) {
+		if (!alloc_varray_item(&mem->node_array, node))
+			goto free_out;
+		init_mem_cgroup_node_info(mem, node);
+	}
 	/* root ? */
 	if (cont->parent == NULL) {
 		int cpu;

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2][memcg] moving memcg's node info array to virtually contiguous array
  2010-07-21 10:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
@ 2010-07-22  5:43   ` Daisuke Nishimura
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Daisuke Nishimura @ 2010-07-22  5:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki; +Cc: linux-mm, balbir, linux-kernel, Daisuke Nishimura

On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:58:31 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> These are just a _toy_ level patches yet. My final purpose is to use indexed array
> for mem_cgroup itself, it has IDs.
> 
> Background:
>   memory cgroup uses struct page_cgroup for tracking all used pages. It's defined as
> ==
> struct page_cgroup {
>         unsigned long flags;
>         struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup;
>         struct page *page;
>         struct list_head lru;           /* per cgroup LRU list */
> };
> ==
>   and this increase the cost of per-page-objects dramatically. Now, we have
>   troubles on this object.
>   1.  Recently, a blkio-tracking guy wants to add "blockio-cgroup" information
>       to page_cgroup. But our concern is extra 8bytes per page.
>   2.  At tracking dirty page status etc...we need some trick for safe access
>       to page_cgroup and memcgroup's information. For example, a small seqlock.
> 
> Now, each memory cgroup has its own ID (0-65535). So, if we can replace
> 8byte of pointer "pc->mem_cgroup" with an ID, which is 2 bytes, we may able
> to have another room. (Moreover, I think we can reduce the number of IDs...)
> 
> This patch is a trial for implement a virually-indexed on-demand array and
> an example of usage. Any commetns are welcome.
> 
So, your purpose is to:

- make the size of mem_croup small(by [2/2])
- manage all the mem_cgroup in virt-array indexed by its ID(it would be faster
  than using css_lookup)
- replace pc->mem_cgroup by its ID and make the size of page_cgroup small

right?

Thanks,
Daisuke Nishimura.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2][memcg] moving memcg's node info array to virtually contiguous array
@ 2010-07-22  5:43   ` Daisuke Nishimura
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Daisuke Nishimura @ 2010-07-22  5:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki; +Cc: linux-mm, balbir, linux-kernel, Daisuke Nishimura

On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:58:31 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> These are just a _toy_ level patches yet. My final purpose is to use indexed array
> for mem_cgroup itself, it has IDs.
> 
> Background:
>   memory cgroup uses struct page_cgroup for tracking all used pages. It's defined as
> ==
> struct page_cgroup {
>         unsigned long flags;
>         struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup;
>         struct page *page;
>         struct list_head lru;           /* per cgroup LRU list */
> };
> ==
>   and this increase the cost of per-page-objects dramatically. Now, we have
>   troubles on this object.
>   1.  Recently, a blkio-tracking guy wants to add "blockio-cgroup" information
>       to page_cgroup. But our concern is extra 8bytes per page.
>   2.  At tracking dirty page status etc...we need some trick for safe access
>       to page_cgroup and memcgroup's information. For example, a small seqlock.
> 
> Now, each memory cgroup has its own ID (0-65535). So, if we can replace
> 8byte of pointer "pc->mem_cgroup" with an ID, which is 2 bytes, we may able
> to have another room. (Moreover, I think we can reduce the number of IDs...)
> 
> This patch is a trial for implement a virually-indexed on-demand array and
> an example of usage. Any commetns are welcome.
> 
So, your purpose is to:

- make the size of mem_croup small(by [2/2])
- manage all the mem_cgroup in virt-array indexed by its ID(it would be faster
  than using css_lookup)
- replace pc->mem_cgroup by its ID and make the size of page_cgroup small

right?

Thanks,
Daisuke Nishimura.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2][memcg] moving memcg's node info array to virtually contiguous array
  2010-07-22  5:43   ` Daisuke Nishimura
@ 2010-07-22  6:04     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki @ 2010-07-22  6:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daisuke Nishimura; +Cc: linux-mm, balbir, linux-kernel

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:43:56 +0900
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:58:31 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> 
> > These are just a _toy_ level patches yet. My final purpose is to use indexed array
> > for mem_cgroup itself, it has IDs.
> > 
> > Background:
> >   memory cgroup uses struct page_cgroup for tracking all used pages. It's defined as
> > ==
> > struct page_cgroup {
> >         unsigned long flags;
> >         struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup;
> >         struct page *page;
> >         struct list_head lru;           /* per cgroup LRU list */
> > };
> > ==
> >   and this increase the cost of per-page-objects dramatically. Now, we have
> >   troubles on this object.
> >   1.  Recently, a blkio-tracking guy wants to add "blockio-cgroup" information
> >       to page_cgroup. But our concern is extra 8bytes per page.
> >   2.  At tracking dirty page status etc...we need some trick for safe access
> >       to page_cgroup and memcgroup's information. For example, a small seqlock.
> > 
> > Now, each memory cgroup has its own ID (0-65535). So, if we can replace
> > 8byte of pointer "pc->mem_cgroup" with an ID, which is 2 bytes, we may able
> > to have another room. (Moreover, I think we can reduce the number of IDs...)
> > 
> > This patch is a trial for implement a virually-indexed on-demand array and
> > an example of usage. Any commetns are welcome.
> > 

Hi,
> So, your purpose is to:
> 
> - make the size of mem_croup small(by [2/2])
It's just an example to test virt-array. I don't convice it can
save memory or make something fast. and I found a bug in free routine.)


> - manage all the mem_cgroup in virt-array indexed by its ID(it would be faster
>   than using css_lookup)
yes.

> - replace pc->mem_cgroup by its ID and make the size of page_cgroup small
> 
yes.

Final style I'm thinking is
	struct page_cgroup {
		unsigned long flags;
		spinlock_t	lock;  # for lock_page_cgroup()
		unsigned short memcg;
		unsigned short blkio;
		struct page *page;
		struct list_head list;
	};
This will be benefical in 64bit. About 32bit, I may have to merge some fields.
Or I may have to add some "version" field for updating memcg's statistics
without locks. memcg field may be able to be moved onto high-bits of "flags"
because it's stable value unless it's not under move_charge. 
(IIUC, at move_charge, memcg is off-LRU and there are no race with AcctLRU bit
 v.s. pc->mem_cgroup field. With other flags, lock_page_cgroup() works enough.)

Anyway, race with move_charge() will be the last enemy for us to track 
dirty pages etc...at least, this kind of "make room" job is required, I feel.

There are many things to be considered, but I'm a bit in hurry. I'd like to do
some preparation before Mel at el rewrites memory-reclaim+writeback complelety.


Thanks,
-Kame


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2][memcg] moving memcg's node info array to virtually contiguous array
@ 2010-07-22  6:04     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki @ 2010-07-22  6:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daisuke Nishimura; +Cc: linux-mm, balbir, linux-kernel

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:43:56 +0900
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:58:31 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> 
> > These are just a _toy_ level patches yet. My final purpose is to use indexed array
> > for mem_cgroup itself, it has IDs.
> > 
> > Background:
> >   memory cgroup uses struct page_cgroup for tracking all used pages. It's defined as
> > ==
> > struct page_cgroup {
> >         unsigned long flags;
> >         struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup;
> >         struct page *page;
> >         struct list_head lru;           /* per cgroup LRU list */
> > };
> > ==
> >   and this increase the cost of per-page-objects dramatically. Now, we have
> >   troubles on this object.
> >   1.  Recently, a blkio-tracking guy wants to add "blockio-cgroup" information
> >       to page_cgroup. But our concern is extra 8bytes per page.
> >   2.  At tracking dirty page status etc...we need some trick for safe access
> >       to page_cgroup and memcgroup's information. For example, a small seqlock.
> > 
> > Now, each memory cgroup has its own ID (0-65535). So, if we can replace
> > 8byte of pointer "pc->mem_cgroup" with an ID, which is 2 bytes, we may able
> > to have another room. (Moreover, I think we can reduce the number of IDs...)
> > 
> > This patch is a trial for implement a virually-indexed on-demand array and
> > an example of usage. Any commetns are welcome.
> > 

Hi,
> So, your purpose is to:
> 
> - make the size of mem_croup small(by [2/2])
It's just an example to test virt-array. I don't convice it can
save memory or make something fast. and I found a bug in free routine.)


> - manage all the mem_cgroup in virt-array indexed by its ID(it would be faster
>   than using css_lookup)
yes.

> - replace pc->mem_cgroup by its ID and make the size of page_cgroup small
> 
yes.

Final style I'm thinking is
	struct page_cgroup {
		unsigned long flags;
		spinlock_t	lock;  # for lock_page_cgroup()
		unsigned short memcg;
		unsigned short blkio;
		struct page *page;
		struct list_head list;
	};
This will be benefical in 64bit. About 32bit, I may have to merge some fields.
Or I may have to add some "version" field for updating memcg's statistics
without locks. memcg field may be able to be moved onto high-bits of "flags"
because it's stable value unless it's not under move_charge. 
(IIUC, at move_charge, memcg is off-LRU and there are no race with AcctLRU bit
 v.s. pc->mem_cgroup field. With other flags, lock_page_cgroup() works enough.)

Anyway, race with move_charge() will be the last enemy for us to track 
dirty pages etc...at least, this kind of "make room" job is required, I feel.

There are many things to be considered, but I'm a bit in hurry. I'd like to do
some preparation before Mel at el rewrites memory-reclaim+writeback complelety.


Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2][memcg] moving memcg's node info array to virtually contiguous array
  2010-07-22  6:04     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
@ 2010-07-22  7:54       ` Daisuke Nishimura
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Daisuke Nishimura @ 2010-07-22  7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki; +Cc: linux-mm, balbir, linux-kernel, Daisuke Nishimura

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:04:45 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:43:56 +0900
> Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:58:31 +0900
> > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > These are just a _toy_ level patches yet. My final purpose is to use indexed array
> > > for mem_cgroup itself, it has IDs.
> > > 
> > > Background:
> > >   memory cgroup uses struct page_cgroup for tracking all used pages. It's defined as
> > > ==
> > > struct page_cgroup {
> > >         unsigned long flags;
> > >         struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup;
> > >         struct page *page;
> > >         struct list_head lru;           /* per cgroup LRU list */
> > > };
> > > ==
> > >   and this increase the cost of per-page-objects dramatically. Now, we have
> > >   troubles on this object.
> > >   1.  Recently, a blkio-tracking guy wants to add "blockio-cgroup" information
> > >       to page_cgroup. But our concern is extra 8bytes per page.
> > >   2.  At tracking dirty page status etc...we need some trick for safe access
> > >       to page_cgroup and memcgroup's information. For example, a small seqlock.
> > > 
> > > Now, each memory cgroup has its own ID (0-65535). So, if we can replace
> > > 8byte of pointer "pc->mem_cgroup" with an ID, which is 2 bytes, we may able
> > > to have another room. (Moreover, I think we can reduce the number of IDs...)
> > > 
> > > This patch is a trial for implement a virually-indexed on-demand array and
> > > an example of usage. Any commetns are welcome.
> > > 
> 
> Hi,
> > So, your purpose is to:
> > 
> > - make the size of mem_croup small(by [2/2])
> It's just an example to test virt-array. I don't convice it can
> save memory or make something fast. and I found a bug in free routine.)
> 
> 
> > - manage all the mem_cgroup in virt-array indexed by its ID(it would be faster
> >   than using css_lookup)
> yes.
> 
> > - replace pc->mem_cgroup by its ID and make the size of page_cgroup small
> > 
> yes.
> 
> Final style I'm thinking is
> 	struct page_cgroup {
> 		unsigned long flags;
> 		spinlock_t	lock;  # for lock_page_cgroup()
> 		unsigned short memcg;
> 		unsigned short blkio;
> 		struct page *page;
> 		struct list_head list;
> 	};
> This will be benefical in 64bit. About 32bit, I may have to merge some fields.
> Or I may have to add some "version" field for updating memcg's statistics
> without locks. memcg field may be able to be moved onto high-bits of "flags"
> because it's stable value unless it's not under move_charge. 
> (IIUC, at move_charge, memcg is off-LRU and there are no race with AcctLRU bit
>  v.s. pc->mem_cgroup field. With other flags, lock_page_cgroup() works enough.)
> 
> Anyway, race with move_charge() will be the last enemy for us to track 
> dirty pages etc...at least, this kind of "make room" job is required, I feel.
> 
> There are many things to be considered, but I'm a bit in hurry. I'd like to do
> some preparation before Mel at el rewrites memory-reclaim+writeback complelety.
> 
Thank you for clarifying your thought.

I have one comment for this patch.
> +static int idx_used(const struct virt_array *v, int idx)
> +{
> +	return test_bit(idx, v->map);
> +}
> +
Who set the bit ?
Shouldn't we set it at alloc_varray_item() ?

Thanks,
Daisuke Nishimura.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2][memcg] moving memcg's node info array to virtually contiguous array
@ 2010-07-22  7:54       ` Daisuke Nishimura
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Daisuke Nishimura @ 2010-07-22  7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki; +Cc: linux-mm, balbir, linux-kernel, Daisuke Nishimura

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:04:45 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:43:56 +0900
> Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:58:31 +0900
> > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > These are just a _toy_ level patches yet. My final purpose is to use indexed array
> > > for mem_cgroup itself, it has IDs.
> > > 
> > > Background:
> > >   memory cgroup uses struct page_cgroup for tracking all used pages. It's defined as
> > > ==
> > > struct page_cgroup {
> > >         unsigned long flags;
> > >         struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup;
> > >         struct page *page;
> > >         struct list_head lru;           /* per cgroup LRU list */
> > > };
> > > ==
> > >   and this increase the cost of per-page-objects dramatically. Now, we have
> > >   troubles on this object.
> > >   1.  Recently, a blkio-tracking guy wants to add "blockio-cgroup" information
> > >       to page_cgroup. But our concern is extra 8bytes per page.
> > >   2.  At tracking dirty page status etc...we need some trick for safe access
> > >       to page_cgroup and memcgroup's information. For example, a small seqlock.
> > > 
> > > Now, each memory cgroup has its own ID (0-65535). So, if we can replace
> > > 8byte of pointer "pc->mem_cgroup" with an ID, which is 2 bytes, we may able
> > > to have another room. (Moreover, I think we can reduce the number of IDs...)
> > > 
> > > This patch is a trial for implement a virually-indexed on-demand array and
> > > an example of usage. Any commetns are welcome.
> > > 
> 
> Hi,
> > So, your purpose is to:
> > 
> > - make the size of mem_croup small(by [2/2])
> It's just an example to test virt-array. I don't convice it can
> save memory or make something fast. and I found a bug in free routine.)
> 
> 
> > - manage all the mem_cgroup in virt-array indexed by its ID(it would be faster
> >   than using css_lookup)
> yes.
> 
> > - replace pc->mem_cgroup by its ID and make the size of page_cgroup small
> > 
> yes.
> 
> Final style I'm thinking is
> 	struct page_cgroup {
> 		unsigned long flags;
> 		spinlock_t	lock;  # for lock_page_cgroup()
> 		unsigned short memcg;
> 		unsigned short blkio;
> 		struct page *page;
> 		struct list_head list;
> 	};
> This will be benefical in 64bit. About 32bit, I may have to merge some fields.
> Or I may have to add some "version" field for updating memcg's statistics
> without locks. memcg field may be able to be moved onto high-bits of "flags"
> because it's stable value unless it's not under move_charge. 
> (IIUC, at move_charge, memcg is off-LRU and there are no race with AcctLRU bit
>  v.s. pc->mem_cgroup field. With other flags, lock_page_cgroup() works enough.)
> 
> Anyway, race with move_charge() will be the last enemy for us to track 
> dirty pages etc...at least, this kind of "make room" job is required, I feel.
> 
> There are many things to be considered, but I'm a bit in hurry. I'd like to do
> some preparation before Mel at el rewrites memory-reclaim+writeback complelety.
> 
Thank you for clarifying your thought.

I have one comment for this patch.
> +static int idx_used(const struct virt_array *v, int idx)
> +{
> +	return test_bit(idx, v->map);
> +}
> +
Who set the bit ?
Shouldn't we set it at alloc_varray_item() ?

Thanks,
Daisuke Nishimura.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2][memcg] moving memcg's node info array to virtually contiguous array
  2010-07-22  7:54       ` Daisuke Nishimura
@ 2010-07-22  7:59         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki @ 2010-07-22  7:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daisuke Nishimura; +Cc: linux-mm, balbir, linux-kernel

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:54:25 +0900
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:

> On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:04:45 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:43:56 +0900
> > Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:58:31 +0900
> > > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > These are just a _toy_ level patches yet. My final purpose is to use indexed array
> > > > for mem_cgroup itself, it has IDs.
> > > > 
> > > > Background:
> > > >   memory cgroup uses struct page_cgroup for tracking all used pages. It's defined as
> > > > ==
> > > > struct page_cgroup {
> > > >         unsigned long flags;
> > > >         struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup;
> > > >         struct page *page;
> > > >         struct list_head lru;           /* per cgroup LRU list */
> > > > };
> > > > ==
> > > >   and this increase the cost of per-page-objects dramatically. Now, we have
> > > >   troubles on this object.
> > > >   1.  Recently, a blkio-tracking guy wants to add "blockio-cgroup" information
> > > >       to page_cgroup. But our concern is extra 8bytes per page.
> > > >   2.  At tracking dirty page status etc...we need some trick for safe access
> > > >       to page_cgroup and memcgroup's information. For example, a small seqlock.
> > > > 
> > > > Now, each memory cgroup has its own ID (0-65535). So, if we can replace
> > > > 8byte of pointer "pc->mem_cgroup" with an ID, which is 2 bytes, we may able
> > > > to have another room. (Moreover, I think we can reduce the number of IDs...)
> > > > 
> > > > This patch is a trial for implement a virually-indexed on-demand array and
> > > > an example of usage. Any commetns are welcome.
> > > > 
> > 
> > Hi,
> > > So, your purpose is to:
> > > 
> > > - make the size of mem_croup small(by [2/2])
> > It's just an example to test virt-array. I don't convice it can
> > save memory or make something fast. and I found a bug in free routine.)
> > 
> > 
> > > - manage all the mem_cgroup in virt-array indexed by its ID(it would be faster
> > >   than using css_lookup)
> > yes.
> > 
> > > - replace pc->mem_cgroup by its ID and make the size of page_cgroup small
> > > 
> > yes.
> > 
> > Final style I'm thinking is
> > 	struct page_cgroup {
> > 		unsigned long flags;
> > 		spinlock_t	lock;  # for lock_page_cgroup()
> > 		unsigned short memcg;
> > 		unsigned short blkio;
> > 		struct page *page;
> > 		struct list_head list;
> > 	};
> > This will be benefical in 64bit. About 32bit, I may have to merge some fields.
> > Or I may have to add some "version" field for updating memcg's statistics
> > without locks. memcg field may be able to be moved onto high-bits of "flags"
> > because it's stable value unless it's not under move_charge. 
> > (IIUC, at move_charge, memcg is off-LRU and there are no race with AcctLRU bit
> >  v.s. pc->mem_cgroup field. With other flags, lock_page_cgroup() works enough.)
> > 
> > Anyway, race with move_charge() will be the last enemy for us to track 
> > dirty pages etc...at least, this kind of "make room" job is required, I feel.
> > 
> > There are many things to be considered, but I'm a bit in hurry. I'd like to do
> > some preparation before Mel at el rewrites memory-reclaim+writeback complelety.
> > 
> Thank you for clarifying your thought.
> 
> I have one comment for this patch.
> > +static int idx_used(const struct virt_array *v, int idx)
> > +{
> > +	return test_bit(idx, v->map);
> > +}
> > +
> Who set the bit ?
> Shouldn't we set it at alloc_varray_item() ?
> 

yes. That's bug. my host crashed ;(
and....clear_bit() is also lacked .

I'll prepare a patch for memory_cgroup_on_array _after_ tests ;)

Thanks,
-Kame


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2][memcg] moving memcg's node info array to virtually contiguous array
@ 2010-07-22  7:59         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki @ 2010-07-22  7:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daisuke Nishimura; +Cc: linux-mm, balbir, linux-kernel

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:54:25 +0900
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:

> On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:04:45 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:43:56 +0900
> > Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:58:31 +0900
> > > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > These are just a _toy_ level patches yet. My final purpose is to use indexed array
> > > > for mem_cgroup itself, it has IDs.
> > > > 
> > > > Background:
> > > >   memory cgroup uses struct page_cgroup for tracking all used pages. It's defined as
> > > > ==
> > > > struct page_cgroup {
> > > >         unsigned long flags;
> > > >         struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup;
> > > >         struct page *page;
> > > >         struct list_head lru;           /* per cgroup LRU list */
> > > > };
> > > > ==
> > > >   and this increase the cost of per-page-objects dramatically. Now, we have
> > > >   troubles on this object.
> > > >   1.  Recently, a blkio-tracking guy wants to add "blockio-cgroup" information
> > > >       to page_cgroup. But our concern is extra 8bytes per page.
> > > >   2.  At tracking dirty page status etc...we need some trick for safe access
> > > >       to page_cgroup and memcgroup's information. For example, a small seqlock.
> > > > 
> > > > Now, each memory cgroup has its own ID (0-65535). So, if we can replace
> > > > 8byte of pointer "pc->mem_cgroup" with an ID, which is 2 bytes, we may able
> > > > to have another room. (Moreover, I think we can reduce the number of IDs...)
> > > > 
> > > > This patch is a trial for implement a virually-indexed on-demand array and
> > > > an example of usage. Any commetns are welcome.
> > > > 
> > 
> > Hi,
> > > So, your purpose is to:
> > > 
> > > - make the size of mem_croup small(by [2/2])
> > It's just an example to test virt-array. I don't convice it can
> > save memory or make something fast. and I found a bug in free routine.)
> > 
> > 
> > > - manage all the mem_cgroup in virt-array indexed by its ID(it would be faster
> > >   than using css_lookup)
> > yes.
> > 
> > > - replace pc->mem_cgroup by its ID and make the size of page_cgroup small
> > > 
> > yes.
> > 
> > Final style I'm thinking is
> > 	struct page_cgroup {
> > 		unsigned long flags;
> > 		spinlock_t	lock;  # for lock_page_cgroup()
> > 		unsigned short memcg;
> > 		unsigned short blkio;
> > 		struct page *page;
> > 		struct list_head list;
> > 	};
> > This will be benefical in 64bit. About 32bit, I may have to merge some fields.
> > Or I may have to add some "version" field for updating memcg's statistics
> > without locks. memcg field may be able to be moved onto high-bits of "flags"
> > because it's stable value unless it's not under move_charge. 
> > (IIUC, at move_charge, memcg is off-LRU and there are no race with AcctLRU bit
> >  v.s. pc->mem_cgroup field. With other flags, lock_page_cgroup() works enough.)
> > 
> > Anyway, race with move_charge() will be the last enemy for us to track 
> > dirty pages etc...at least, this kind of "make room" job is required, I feel.
> > 
> > There are many things to be considered, but I'm a bit in hurry. I'd like to do
> > some preparation before Mel at el rewrites memory-reclaim+writeback complelety.
> > 
> Thank you for clarifying your thought.
> 
> I have one comment for this patch.
> > +static int idx_used(const struct virt_array *v, int idx)
> > +{
> > +	return test_bit(idx, v->map);
> > +}
> > +
> Who set the bit ?
> Shouldn't we set it at alloc_varray_item() ?
> 

yes. That's bug. my host crashed ;(
and....clear_bit() is also lacked .

I'll prepare a patch for memory_cgroup_on_array _after_ tests ;)

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-07-22  8:04 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-07-21 10:58 [RFC][PATCH 1/2][memcg] moving memcg's node info array to virtually contiguous array KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-21 10:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-21 11:00 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2][memcg] use virt-array for memcg KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-21 11:00   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-22  5:43 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2][memcg] moving memcg's node info array to virtually contiguous array Daisuke Nishimura
2010-07-22  5:43   ` Daisuke Nishimura
2010-07-22  6:04   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-22  6:04     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-22  7:54     ` Daisuke Nishimura
2010-07-22  7:54       ` Daisuke Nishimura
2010-07-22  7:59       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-22  7:59         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.