2.6.36-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.35

2.6.36-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.35

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.35,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.

If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.35, please let us
know either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know
if any of the entries below are invalid.

Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply
to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling
the issue.


Listed regressions statistics:

  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
  ----------------------------------------
  2010-09-20       38       15          15
  2010-09-12       28       14          13
  2010-08-30       21       16          15


Unresolved regressions
----------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18872
Subject		: Radeon KMS r100 and STR problems
Submitter	: Richard Mittendorfer <delist@gmx.net>
Date		: 2010-09-17 18:26 (4 days old)
Message-ID	: <20100917202647.aa4b6300.delist@gmx.net>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128474802809779&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18862
Subject		: [BUG]Kernel 2.6.36rc4 crash when rmmod pm8001
Submitter	: Jack Wang <jack_wang@usish.com>
Date		: 2010-09-17 10:11 (4 days old)
Message-ID	: <3219F4D1734640238A632382C50F633E@usish.com.cn>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128471846828998&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18742
Subject		: PROBLEM: Kernel panic on 2.6.36-rc4 when loading intel_ips on Core i3 laptop
Submitter	: infernix <infernix@infernix.net>
Date		: 2010-09-15 14:35 (6 days old)
Message-ID	: <4C90D998.6050103@infernix.net>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128456187928496&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18692
Subject		: 2.6.36-rc4/iwl: warning triggered in net/mac80211/scan.c:266
Submitter	: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Date		: 2010-09-14 14:28 (7 days old)
Message-ID	: <20100914142814.GA8744@redhat.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128447487918792&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18432
Subject		: radeon kms freezes on boot with video= option
Submitter	: Jose Marino <braket@hotmail.com>
Date		: 2010-09-13 22:28 (8 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18402
Subject		: 2.6.36-rc4 KPs whenever booting on a Pentium 4 HT system
Submitter	: Michael Marley <michael@michaelmarley.com>
Date		: 2010-09-13 15:07 (8 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18342
Subject		: [regression] i915 incorrectly detects bogus LVDS connection instead of LVDS1
Submitter	: Woody Suwalski <terraluna977@gmail.com>
Date		: 2010-09-08 15:10 (13 days old)
Message-ID	: <AANLkTim2mrVRCKg-2couMTFV7krHQp0+2e_cbaiT_KYW@mail.gmail.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128395866331382&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18332
Subject		: [regression] *ERROR* timed out waiting for FORCE_DETECT in 36rc3 on i915
Submitter	: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Date		: 2010-09-08 13:53 (13 days old)
Message-ID	: <87mxrswddf.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128395400624946&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17752
Subject		: 2.6.36-rc3: inconsistent lock state (iprune_sem, shrink_icache_memory)
Submitter	: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date		: 2010-09-01 6:37 (20 days old)
Message-ID	: <tkrat.ed8eda6bc8ffe64e@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128332308528119&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17722
Subject		: 2.6.36-rc3: WARNING: at net/mac80211/scan.c:269 ieee80211_scan_completed
Submitter	: Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Date		: 2010-08-31 20:14 (21 days old)
Message-ID	: <201008312214.52473.thomas@m3y3r.de>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128328580504227&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17361
Subject		: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP in jbd2_journal_get_write_access
Submitter	: Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
Date		: 2010-08-29 19:59 (23 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17341
Subject		: kdump regression compared to v2.6.35
Submitter	: CAI Qian <caiqian@redhat.com>
Date		: 2010-08-27 12:35 (25 days old)
Message-ID	: <2136707099.1405541282912500148.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128291252612135&w=2
Handled-By	: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17061
Subject		: 2.6.36-rc1 on zaurus: bluetooth regression
Submitter	: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date		: 2010-08-21 15:24 (31 days old)
Message-ID	: <20100821152445.GA1536@ucw.cz>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128240433828087&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16971
Subject		: qla4xxx compile failure on 32-bit PowerPC: missing readq and writeq
Submitter	: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
Date		: 2010-08-19 21:03 (33 days old)
Message-ID	: <alpine.SOC.1.00.1008192359310.19654@math.ut.ee>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128225184900892&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16951
Subject		: hackbench regression with 2.6.36-rc1
Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date		: 2010-08-18 6:18 (34 days old)
Message-ID	: <1282112318.21202.8.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128211235904910&w=2


For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.

As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.35,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16444

Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that
should be added to the list in there.

Thanks!

[Bug #16951] hackbench regression with 2.6.36-rc1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16951
Subject		: hackbench regression with 2.6.36-rc1
Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date		: 2010-08-18 6:18 (34 days old)
Message-ID	: <1282112318.21202.8.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128211235904910&w=2

[Bug #16951] hackbench regression with 2.6.36-rc1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16951
Subject		: hackbench regression with 2.6.36-rc1
Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-08-18 6:18 (34 days old)
Message-ID	: <1282112318.21202.8.camel-sz7BYL/Y5Hu/P+R7jlPCFVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128211235904910&w=2

[Bug #17341] kdump regression compared to v2.6.35

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17341
Subject		: kdump regression compared to v2.6.35
Submitter	: CAI Qian <caiqian@redhat.com>
Date		: 2010-08-27 12:35 (25 days old)
Message-ID	: <2136707099.1405541282912500148.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128291252612135&w=2
Handled-By	: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

[Bug #17361] Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP in jbd2_journal_get_write_access

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17361
Subject		: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP in jbd2_journal_get_write_access
Submitter	: Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
Date		: 2010-08-29 19:59 (23 days old)

[Bug #16971] qla4xxx compile failure on 32-bit PowerPC: missing readq and writeq

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16971
Subject		: qla4xxx compile failure on 32-bit PowerPC: missing readq and writeq
Submitter	: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
Date		: 2010-08-19 21:03 (33 days old)
Message-ID	: <alpine.SOC.1.00.1008192359310.19654@math.ut.ee>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128225184900892&w=2

[Bug #17722] 2.6.36-rc3: WARNING: at net/mac80211/scan.c:269 ieee80211_scan_completed

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17722
Subject		: 2.6.36-rc3: WARNING: at net/mac80211/scan.c:269 ieee80211_scan_completed
Submitter	: Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Date		: 2010-08-31 20:14 (21 days old)
Message-ID	: <201008312214.52473.thomas@m3y3r.de>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128328580504227&w=2

[Bug #17061] 2.6.36-rc1 on zaurus: bluetooth regression

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17061
Subject		: 2.6.36-rc1 on zaurus: bluetooth regression
Submitter	: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date		: 2010-08-21 15:24 (31 days old)
Message-ID	: <20100821152445.GA1536@ucw.cz>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128240433828087&w=2

[Bug #16971] qla4xxx compile failure on 32-bit PowerPC: missing readq and writeq

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16971
Subject		: qla4xxx compile failure on 32-bit PowerPC: missing readq and writeq
Submitter	: Meelis Roos <mroos-Y27EyoLml9s@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-08-19 21:03 (33 days old)
Message-ID	: <alpine.SOC.1.00.1008192359310.19654-ptEonEWSGqKptlylMvRsHA@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128225184900892&w=2

[Bug #17361] Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP in jbd2_journal_get_write_access

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17361
Subject		: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP in jbd2_journal_get_write_access
Submitter	: Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-08-29 19:59 (23 days old)

[Bug #17722] 2.6.36-rc3: WARNING: at net/mac80211/scan.c:269 ieee80211_scan_completed

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17722
Subject		: 2.6.36-rc3: WARNING: at net/mac80211/scan.c:269 ieee80211_scan_completed
Submitter	: Thomas Meyer <thomas-VsYtu1Qij5c@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-08-31 20:14 (21 days old)
Message-ID	: <201008312214.52473.thomas-VsYtu1Qij5c@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128328580504227&w=2

[Bug #17061] 2.6.36-rc1 on zaurus: bluetooth regression

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17061
Subject		: 2.6.36-rc1 on zaurus: bluetooth regression
Submitter	: Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-08-21 15:24 (31 days old)
Message-ID	: <20100821152445.GA1536-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128240433828087&w=2

[Bug #18332] [regression] *ERROR* timed out waiting for FORCE_DETECT in 36rc3 on i915

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18332
Subject		: [regression] *ERROR* timed out waiting for FORCE_DETECT in 36rc3 on i915
Submitter	: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Date		: 2010-09-08 13:53 (13 days old)
Message-ID	: <87mxrswddf.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128395400624946&w=2

[Bug #18342] [regression] i915 incorrectly detects bogus LVDS connection instead of LVDS1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18342
Subject		: [regression] i915 incorrectly detects bogus LVDS connection instead of LVDS1
Submitter	: Woody Suwalski <terraluna977@gmail.com>
Date		: 2010-09-08 15:10 (13 days old)
Message-ID	: <AANLkTim2mrVRCKg-2couMTFV7krHQp0+2e_cbaiT_KYW@mail.gmail.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128395866331382&w=2

[Bug #18432] radeon kms freezes on boot with video= option

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18432
Subject		: radeon kms freezes on boot with video= option
Submitter	: Jose Marino <braket@hotmail.com>
Date		: 2010-09-13 22:28 (8 days old)

[Bug #17752] 2.6.36-rc3: inconsistent lock state (iprune_sem, shrink_icache_memory)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17752
Subject		: 2.6.36-rc3: inconsistent lock state (iprune_sem, shrink_icache_memory)
Submitter	: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date		: 2010-09-01 6:37 (20 days old)
Message-ID	: <tkrat.ed8eda6bc8ffe64e@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128332308528119&w=2

[Bug #18402] 2.6.36-rc4 KPs whenever booting on a Pentium 4 HT system

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18402
Subject		: 2.6.36-rc4 KPs whenever booting on a Pentium 4 HT system
Submitter	: Michael Marley <michael@michaelmarley.com>
Date		: 2010-09-13 15:07 (8 days old)

[Bug #18342] [regression] i915 incorrectly detects bogus LVDS connection instead of LVDS1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18342
Subject		: [regression] i915 incorrectly detects bogus LVDS connection instead of LVDS1
Submitter	: Woody Suwalski <terraluna977-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-09-08 15:10 (13 days old)
Message-ID	: <AANLkTim2mrVRCKg-2couMTFV7krHQp0+2e_cbaiT_KYW-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128395866331382&w=2

[Bug #17752] 2.6.36-rc3: inconsistent lock state (iprune_sem, shrink_icache_memory)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17752
Subject		: 2.6.36-rc3: inconsistent lock state (iprune_sem, shrink_icache_memory)
Submitter	: Stefan Richter <stefanr-MtYdepGKPcBMYopoZt5u/LNAH6kLmebB@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-09-01 6:37 (20 days old)
Message-ID	: <tkrat.ed8eda6bc8ffe64e-MtYdepGKPcBMYopoZt5u/LNAH6kLmebB@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128332308528119&w=2

[Bug #18402] 2.6.36-rc4 KPs whenever booting on a Pentium 4 HT system

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18402
Subject		: 2.6.36-rc4 KPs whenever booting on a Pentium 4 HT system
Submitter	: Michael Marley <michael-5Y08+B5RRAhCl8HX7eA5MgC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-09-13 15:07 (8 days old)

[Bug #18862] [BUG]Kernel 2.6.36rc4 crash when rmmod pm8001

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18862
Subject		: [BUG]Kernel 2.6.36rc4 crash when rmmod pm8001
Submitter	: Jack Wang <jack_wang@usish.com>
Date		: 2010-09-17 10:11 (4 days old)
Message-ID	: <3219F4D1734640238A632382C50F633E@usish.com.cn>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128471846828998&w=2

[Bug #18742] PROBLEM: Kernel panic on 2.6.36-rc4 when loading intel_ips on Core i3 laptop

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18742
Subject		: PROBLEM: Kernel panic on 2.6.36-rc4 when loading intel_ips on Core i3 laptop
Submitter	: infernix <infernix@infernix.net>
Date		: 2010-09-15 14:35 (6 days old)
Message-ID	: <4C90D998.6050103@infernix.net>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128456187928496&w=2

[Bug #18692] 2.6.36-rc4/iwl: warning triggered in net/mac80211/scan.c:266

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18692
Subject		: 2.6.36-rc4/iwl: warning triggered in net/mac80211/scan.c:266
Submitter	: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Date		: 2010-09-14 14:28 (7 days old)
Message-ID	: <20100914142814.GA8744@redhat.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128447487918792&w=2

[Bug #18862] [BUG]Kernel 2.6.36rc4 crash when rmmod pm8001

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18862
Subject		: [BUG]Kernel 2.6.36rc4 crash when rmmod pm8001
Submitter	: Jack Wang <jack_wang-aA8Fybl81pAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-09-17 10:11 (4 days old)
Message-ID	: <3219F4D1734640238A632382C50F633E-aA8Fybl81pBv1O+Z8WTAqQ@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128471846828998&w=2

[Bug #18692] 2.6.36-rc4/iwl: warning triggered in net/mac80211/scan.c:266

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18692
Subject		: 2.6.36-rc4/iwl: warning triggered in net/mac80211/scan.c:266
Submitter	: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-09-14 14:28 (7 days old)
Message-ID	: <20100914142814.GA8744-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128447487918792&w=2

[Bug #18872] Radeon KMS r100 and STR problems

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18872
Subject		: Radeon KMS r100 and STR problems
Submitter	: Richard Mittendorfer <delist@gmx.net>
Date		: 2010-09-17 18:26 (4 days old)
Message-ID	: <20100917202647.aa4b6300.delist@gmx.net>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128474802809779&w=2

Re: 2.6.36-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.35

[Sedat Dilek]

Hi Rafael,

can you please add the following, Thanks in advance.
> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18872
> Subject         : Radeon KMS r100 and STR problems
> Submitter       : Richard Mittendorfer <delist@gmx.net>
> Date            : 2010-09-17 18:26 (4 days old)
> Message-ID      : <20100917202647.aa4b6300.delist@gmx.net>
> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128474802809779&w=2

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.35,
> for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
> If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
>
> If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.35, please let us
> know either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know
> if any of the entries below are invalid.
>
> Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply
> to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling
> the issue.
>
>
> Listed regressions statistics:
>
>  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
>  ----------------------------------------
>  2010-09-20       38       15          15
>  2010-09-12       28       14          13
>  2010-08-30       21       16          15
>
>
> Unresolved regressions

Hi Rafael,

can you please add the following Bug, Thanks in advance.

Bug-Entry       : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16140
Subject         : Suspend To RAM/ Resume broken - Radeon KMS on RV250
Submitter       : Michael Long <harn-solo@gmx.de>
Date            : 2010-06-06 09:52
Message-ID      : ???
References      : ???

What is with "Regression:	No" in the BR? Change?

Regards,
- Sedat -

Re: 2.6.36-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.35

[Sedat Dilek]

Hi Rafael,

can you please add the following, Thanks in advance.
> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18872
> Subject         : Radeon KMS r100 and STR problems
> Submitter       : Richard Mittendorfer <delist@gmx.net>
> Date            : 2010-09-17 18:26 (4 days old)
> Message-ID      : <20100917202647.aa4b6300.delist@gmx.net>
> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128474802809779&w=2

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.35,
> for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
> If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
>
> If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.35, please let us
> know either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know
> if any of the entries below are invalid.
>
> Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply
> to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling
> the issue.
>
>
> Listed regressions statistics:
>
>  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
>  ----------------------------------------
>  2010-09-20       38       15          15
>  2010-09-12       28       14          13
>  2010-08-30       21       16          15
>
>
> Unresolved regressions

Hi Rafael,

can you please add the following Bug, Thanks in advance.

Bug-Entry       : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16140
Subject         : Suspend To RAM/ Resume broken - Radeon KMS on RV250
Submitter       : Michael Long <harn-solo@gmx.de>
Date            : 2010-06-06 09:52
Message-ID      : ???
References      : ???

What is with "Regression:	No" in the BR? Change?

Regards,
- Sedat -
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

Re: 2.6.36-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.35

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

[Trimming the CC list.]

On Monday, September 20, 2010, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> can you please add the following, Thanks in advance.
> > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18872
> > Subject         : Radeon KMS r100 and STR problems
> > Submitter       : Richard Mittendorfer <delist@gmx.net>
> > Date            : 2010-09-17 18:26 (4 days old)
> > Message-ID      : <20100917202647.aa4b6300.delist@gmx.net>
> > References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128474802809779&w=2
> 
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.35,
> > for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
> > If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
> >
> > If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.35, please let us
> > know either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know
> > if any of the entries below are invalid.
> >
> > Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply
> > to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling
> > the issue.
> >
> >
> > Listed regressions statistics:
> >
> >  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
> >  ----------------------------------------
> >  2010-09-20       38       15          15
> >  2010-09-12       28       14          13
> >  2010-08-30       21       16          15
> >
> >
> > Unresolved regressions
> 
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> can you please add the following Bug, Thanks in advance.
> 
> Bug-Entry       : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16140
> Subject         : Suspend To RAM/ Resume broken - Radeon KMS on RV250
> Submitter       : Michael Long <harn-solo@gmx.de>
> Date            : 2010-06-06 09:52
> Message-ID      : ???
> References      : ???
> 
> What is with "Regression:	No" in the BR? Change?

Yes, but according to the comments in there, it is a regression from 2.6.33.
I marked is as such and linked it to the appropriate meta-bug entry, but we're
not going to list it, because we only list post-2.6.34 (and post-2.6.35)
regressions in the current cycle.

Thanks,
Rafael

Re: 2.6.36-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.35

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

[Trimming the CC list.]

On Monday, September 20, 2010, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> can you please add the following, Thanks in advance.
> > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18872
> > Subject         : Radeon KMS r100 and STR problems
> > Submitter       : Richard Mittendorfer <delist-hi6Y0CQ0nG0@public.gmane.org>
> > Date            : 2010-09-17 18:26 (4 days old)
> > Message-ID      : <20100917202647.aa4b6300.delist-hi6Y0CQ0nG0@public.gmane.org>
> > References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128474802809779&w=2
> 
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.35,
> > for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
> > If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
> >
> > If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.35, please let us
> > know either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know
> > if any of the entries below are invalid.
> >
> > Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply
> > to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling
> > the issue.
> >
> >
> > Listed regressions statistics:
> >
> >  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
> >  ----------------------------------------
> >  2010-09-20       38       15          15
> >  2010-09-12       28       14          13
> >  2010-08-30       21       16          15
> >
> >
> > Unresolved regressions
> 
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> can you please add the following Bug, Thanks in advance.
> 
> Bug-Entry       : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16140
> Subject         : Suspend To RAM/ Resume broken - Radeon KMS on RV250
> Submitter       : Michael Long <harn-solo-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
> Date            : 2010-06-06 09:52
> Message-ID      : ???
> References      : ???
> 
> What is with "Regression:	No" in the BR? Change?

Yes, but according to the comments in there, it is a regression from 2.6.33.
I marked is as such and linked it to the appropriate meta-bug entry, but we're
not going to list it, because we only list post-2.6.34 (and post-2.6.35)
regressions in the current cycle.

Thanks,
Rafael

Re: [Bug #17722] 2.6.36-rc3: WARNING: at net/mac80211/scan.c:269 ieee80211_scan_completed

[Thomas Meyer]

Am 20.09.2010 um 21:08 schrieb "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>:

> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
> 
> 
> 

See also: 

http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg140769.html
> 
> 

Re: [Bug #17722] 2.6.36-rc3: WARNING: at net/mac80211/scan.c:269 ieee80211_scan_completed

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday, September 20, 2010, Thomas Meyer wrote:
> Am 20.09.2010 um 21:08 schrieb "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>:
> 
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> See also: 
> 
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg140769.html

I have updated the bug entry with this link, thanks for your feedback.

Rafael

Re: [Bug #17722] 2.6.36-rc3: WARNING: at net/mac80211/scan.c:269 ieee80211_scan_completed

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday, September 20, 2010, Thomas Meyer wrote:
> Am 20.09.2010 um 21:08 schrieb "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>:
> 
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> See also: 
> 
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg140769.html

I have updated the bug entry with this link, thanks for your feedback.

Rafael

Re: [Bug #17752] 2.6.36-rc3: inconsistent lock state (iprune_sem, shrink_icache_memory)

[Stefan Richter]

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17752
> Subject		: 2.6.36-rc3: inconsistent lock state (iprune_sem, shrink_icache_memory)
> Submitter	: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
> Date		: 2010-09-01 6:37 (20 days old)
> Message-ID	: <tkrat.ed8eda6bc8ffe64e@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128332308528119&w=2

I think this should not be marked as a regression.  See the older reports of
very similar issues (in my LKML mail from September 3, logged in bugzilla in
comment #1)
	http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/15/76	(2.6.33-rc, xfs involved)
	http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/18/108	(2.6.32.y, ntfs involved)
and hch's analysis in the first of these two threads
	http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/19/267	(several filesystems and
						 other code paths)
So, unless my trace was a code path that only newly acquired that oldproblem
of other code paths, this is an older issue.  Alas this is not obvious to me
at least from the log that I got.

I did not have lockdep enabled on the machine which delivered the log during
the last few months or so; I just remembered to re-enable it at the occasion
of switching to 2.6.36-rc.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==-=- =--= =-=--
http://arcgraph.de/sr/

Re: [Bug #17752] 2.6.36-rc3: inconsistent lock state (iprune_sem, shrink_icache_memory)

[Stefan Richter]

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17752
> Subject		: 2.6.36-rc3: inconsistent lock state (iprune_sem, shrink_icache_memory)
> Submitter	: Stefan Richter <stefanr-MtYdepGKPcBMYopoZt5u/LNAH6kLmebB@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2010-09-01 6:37 (20 days old)
> Message-ID	: <tkrat.ed8eda6bc8ffe64e-MtYdepGKPcBMYopoZt5u/LNAH6kLmebB@public.gmane.org>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128332308528119&w=2

I think this should not be marked as a regression.  See the older reports of
very similar issues (in my LKML mail from September 3, logged in bugzilla in
comment #1)
	http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/15/76	(2.6.33-rc, xfs involved)
	http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/18/108	(2.6.32.y, ntfs involved)
and hch's analysis in the first of these two threads
	http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/19/267	(several filesystems and
						 other code paths)
So, unless my trace was a code path that only newly acquired that oldproblem
of other code paths, this is an older issue.  Alas this is not obvious to me
at least from the log that I got.

I did not have lockdep enabled on the machine which delivered the log during
the last few months or so; I just remembered to re-enable it at the occasion
of switching to 2.6.36-rc.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==-=- =--= =-=--
http://arcgraph.de/sr/

Re: [Bug #17752] 2.6.36-rc3: inconsistent lock state (iprune_sem, shrink_icache_memory)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday, September 20, 2010, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17752
> > Subject		: 2.6.36-rc3: inconsistent lock state (iprune_sem, shrink_icache_memory)
> > Submitter	: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
> > Date		: 2010-09-01 6:37 (20 days old)
> > Message-ID	: <tkrat.ed8eda6bc8ffe64e@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128332308528119&w=2
> 
> I think this should not be marked as a regression.  See the older reports of
> very similar issues (in my LKML mail from September 3, logged in bugzilla in
> comment #1)
> 	http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/15/76	(2.6.33-rc, xfs involved)
> 	http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/18/108	(2.6.32.y, ntfs involved)
> and hch's analysis in the first of these two threads
> 	http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/19/267	(several filesystems and
> 						 other code paths)
> So, unless my trace was a code path that only newly acquired that oldproblem
> of other code paths, this is an older issue.  Alas this is not obvious to me
> at least from the log that I got.
> 
> I did not have lockdep enabled on the machine which delivered the log during
> the last few months or so; I just remembered to re-enable it at the occasion
> of switching to 2.6.36-rc.

Thanks a lot for the info, I've dropped this bug from the list of recent regressions.

Rafael

Re: [Bug #17752] 2.6.36-rc3: inconsistent lock state (iprune_sem, shrink_icache_memory)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday, September 20, 2010, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17752
> > Subject		: 2.6.36-rc3: inconsistent lock state (iprune_sem, shrink_icache_memory)
> > Submitter	: Stefan Richter <stefanr-MtYdepGKPcBMYopoZt5u/LNAH6kLmebB@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2010-09-01 6:37 (20 days old)
> > Message-ID	: <tkrat.ed8eda6bc8ffe64e-MtYdepGKPcBMYopoZt5u/LNAH6kLmebB@public.gmane.org>
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128332308528119&w=2
> 
> I think this should not be marked as a regression.  See the older reports of
> very similar issues (in my LKML mail from September 3, logged in bugzilla in
> comment #1)
> 	http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/15/76	(2.6.33-rc, xfs involved)
> 	http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/18/108	(2.6.32.y, ntfs involved)
> and hch's analysis in the first of these two threads
> 	http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/19/267	(several filesystems and
> 						 other code paths)
> So, unless my trace was a code path that only newly acquired that oldproblem
> of other code paths, this is an older issue.  Alas this is not obvious to me
> at least from the log that I got.
> 
> I did not have lockdep enabled on the machine which delivered the log during
> the last few months or so; I just remembered to re-enable it at the occasion
> of switching to 2.6.36-rc.

Thanks a lot for the info, I've dropped this bug from the list of recent regressions.

Rafael

Re: 2.6.36-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.35

[Alex Deucher]

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> can you please add the following, Thanks in advance.
>> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18872
>> Subject         : Radeon KMS r100 and STR problems
>> Submitter       : Richard Mittendorfer <delist@gmx.net>
>> Date            : 2010-09-17 18:26 (4 days old)
>> Message-ID      : <20100917202647.aa4b6300.delist@gmx.net>
>> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128474802809779&w=2
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>> This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.35,
>> for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
>> If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
>>
>> If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.35, please let us
>> know either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know
>> if any of the entries below are invalid.
>>
>> Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply
>> to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling
>> the issue.
>>
>>
>> Listed regressions statistics:
>>
>>  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
>>  ----------------------------------------
>>  2010-09-20       38       15          15
>>  2010-09-12       28       14          13
>>  2010-08-30       21       16          15
>>
>>
>> Unresolved regressions
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> can you please add the following Bug, Thanks in advance.
>
> Bug-Entry       : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16140
> Subject         : Suspend To RAM/ Resume broken - Radeon KMS on RV250
> Submitter       : Michael Long <harn-solo@gmx.de>
> Date            : 2010-06-06 09:52
> Message-ID      : ???
> References      : ???
>
> What is with "Regression:       No" in the BR? Change?

This isn't a regression as according to your bug report, s/r has never
worked on your board with kms.  The kms and ums drm components are
completely different drivers even though they are compiled into the
same binary.

Alex

>
> Regards,
> - Sedat -
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>

Re: 2.6.36-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.35

[Alex Deucher]

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> can you please add the following, Thanks in advance.
>> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18872
>> Subject         : Radeon KMS r100 and STR problems
>> Submitter       : Richard Mittendorfer <delist@gmx.net>
>> Date            : 2010-09-17 18:26 (4 days old)
>> Message-ID      : <20100917202647.aa4b6300.delist@gmx.net>
>> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128474802809779&w=2
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>> This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.35,
>> for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
>> If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
>>
>> If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.35, please let us
>> know either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know
>> if any of the entries below are invalid.
>>
>> Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply
>> to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling
>> the issue.
>>
>>
>> Listed regressions statistics:
>>
>>  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
>>  ----------------------------------------
>>  2010-09-20       38       15          15
>>  2010-09-12       28       14          13
>>  2010-08-30       21       16          15
>>
>>
>> Unresolved regressions
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> can you please add the following Bug, Thanks in advance.
>
> Bug-Entry       : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16140
> Subject         : Suspend To RAM/ Resume broken - Radeon KMS on RV250
> Submitter       : Michael Long <harn-solo@gmx.de>
> Date            : 2010-06-06 09:52
> Message-ID      : ???
> References      : ???
>
> What is with "Regression:       No" in the BR? Change?

This isn't a regression as according to your bug report, s/r has never
worked on your board with kms.  The kms and ums drm components are
completely different drivers even though they are compiled into the
same binary.

Alex

>
> Regards,
> - Sedat -
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: 2.6.36-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.35

[Alex Deucher]

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> can you please add the following, Thanks in advance.
>> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18872
>> Subject         : Radeon KMS r100 and STR problems
>> Submitter       : Richard Mittendorfer <delist@gmx.net>
>> Date            : 2010-09-17 18:26 (4 days old)
>> Message-ID      : <20100917202647.aa4b6300.delist@gmx.net>
>> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128474802809779&w=2
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>> This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.35,
>> for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
>> If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
>>
>> If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.35, please let us
>> know either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know
>> if any of the entries below are invalid.
>>
>> Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply
>> to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling
>> the issue.
>>
>>
>> Listed regressions statistics:
>>
>>  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
>>  ----------------------------------------
>>  2010-09-20       38       15          15
>>  2010-09-12       28       14          13
>>  2010-08-30       21       16          15
>>
>>
>> Unresolved regressions
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> can you please add the following Bug, Thanks in advance.
>
> Bug-Entry       : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16140
> Subject         : Suspend To RAM/ Resume broken - Radeon KMS on RV250
> Submitter       : Michael Long <harn-solo@gmx.de>
> Date            : 2010-06-06 09:52
> Message-ID      : ???
> References      : ???
>
> What is with "Regression:       No" in the BR? Change?

This isn't a regression as according to your bug report, s/r has never
worked on your board with kms.  The kms and ums drm components are
completely different drivers even though they are compiled into the
same binary.

Alex

>
> Regards,
> - Sedat -
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>

RE: [Bug #18862] [BUG]Kernel 2.6.36rc4 crash when rmmod pm8001

[Jack Wang]

Hi, Rafael and list

I recompile a clean 2.6.36rc4 kernel, and try to reproduce this BUG, but I
cound not make this appear any more, sorry for that, maybe I hit the bug
during I
debug the libsas bug, sorry!

Jack


This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the
tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18862
Subject		: [BUG]Kernel 2.6.36rc4 crash when rmmod pm8001
Submitter	: Jack Wang <jack_wang@usish.com>
Date		: 2010-09-17 10:11 (4 days old)
Message-ID	: <3219F4D1734640238A632382C50F633E@usish.com.cn>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128471846828998&w=2

Re: [Bug #18332] [regression] *ERROR* timed out waiting for FORCE_DETECT in 36rc3 on i915

[Andi Kleen]

> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the
> tracking team3
> know (either way).

I believe Chris Wilson already fixed it by downgrading the message,
but I don't know if the fix is 2.6.35 track.

-Andi

>
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18332
> Subject		: [regression] *ERROR* timed out waiting for FORCE_DETECT in
> 36rc3 on i915
> Submitter	: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
> Date		: 2010-09-08 13:53 (13 days old)
> Message-ID	: <87mxrswddf.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128395400624946&w=2
>
>
>

Re: [Bug #18332] [regression] *ERROR* timed out waiting for FORCE_DETECT in 36rc3 on i915

[Andi Kleen]

> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the
> tracking team3
> know (either way).

I believe Chris Wilson already fixed it by downgrading the message,
but I don't know if the fix is 2.6.35 track.

-Andi

>
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18332
> Subject		: [regression] *ERROR* timed out waiting for FORCE_DETECT in
> 36rc3 on i915
> Submitter	: Andi Kleen <andi-Vw/NltI1exuRpAAqCnN02g@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2010-09-08 13:53 (13 days old)
> Message-ID	: <87mxrswddf.fsf-3rXA9MLqAseW/qJFnhkgxti2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128395400624946&w=2
>
>
>

Re: [Bug #18332] [regression] *ERROR* timed out waiting for FORCE_DETECT in 36rc3 on i915

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday, September 21, 2010, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the
> > tracking team3
> > know (either way).
> 
> I believe Chris Wilson already fixed it by downgrading the message,
> but I don't know if the fix is 2.6.35 track.

Chris?

Re: [Bug #18332] [regression] *ERROR* timed out waiting for FORCE_DETECT in 36rc3 on i915

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday, September 21, 2010, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the
> > tracking team3
> > know (either way).
> 
> I believe Chris Wilson already fixed it by downgrading the message,
> but I don't know if the fix is 2.6.35 track.

Chris?

Re: [Bug #18862] [BUG]Kernel 2.6.36rc4 crash when rmmod pm8001

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday, September 21, 2010, Jack Wang wrote:
> Hi, Rafael and list
> 
> I recompile a clean 2.6.36rc4 kernel, and try to reproduce this BUG, but I
> cound not make this appear any more, sorry for that, maybe I hit the bug
> during I
> debug the libsas bug, sorry!

Thanks for the update, closing.

Rafael

Re: [Bug #18862] [BUG]Kernel 2.6.36rc4 crash when rmmod pm8001

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday, September 21, 2010, Jack Wang wrote:
> Hi, Rafael and list
> 
> I recompile a clean 2.6.36rc4 kernel, and try to reproduce this BUG, but I
> cound not make this appear any more, sorry for that, maybe I hit the bug
> during I
> debug the libsas bug, sorry!

Thanks for the update, closing.

Rafael

Re: [Bug #16971] qla4xxx compile failure on 32-bit PowerPC: missing readq and writeq

[Meelis Roos]

> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16971
> Subject		: qla4xxx compile failure on 32-bit PowerPC: missing readq and writeq
> Submitter	: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
> Date		: 2010-08-19 21:03 (33 days old)
> Message-ID	: <alpine.SOC.1.00.1008192359310.19654@math.ut.ee>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128225184900892&w=2

Still present. The maintainer of the driver has a patch that I have 
tested, and for quite some time now, but it still does not appear in 
mainline.

-- 
Meelis Roos (mroos@linux.ee)

Re: [Bug #16971] qla4xxx compile failure on 32-bit PowerPC: missing readq and writeq

[Meelis Roos]

> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16971
> Subject		: qla4xxx compile failure on 32-bit PowerPC: missing readq and writeq
> Submitter	: Meelis Roos <mroos-Y27EyoLml9s@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2010-08-19 21:03 (33 days old)
> Message-ID	: <alpine.SOC.1.00.1008192359310.19654-ptEonEWSGqKptlylMvRsHA@public.gmane.org>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128225184900892&w=2

Still present. The maintainer of the driver has a patch that I have 
tested, and for quite some time now, but it still does not appear in 
mainline.

-- 
Meelis Roos (mroos-Y27EyoLml9s@public.gmane.org)

Re: [Bug #16971] qla4xxx compile failure on 32-bit PowerPC: missing readq and writeq

[Florian Mickler]

On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:50:03 +0300 (EEST)
Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee> wrote:

> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16971
> > Subject		: qla4xxx compile failure on 32-bit PowerPC: missing readq and writeq
> > Submitter	: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
> > Date		: 2010-08-19 21:03 (33 days old)
> > Message-ID	: <alpine.SOC.1.00.1008192359310.19654@math.ut.ee>
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128225184900892&w=2
> 
> Still present. The maintainer of the driver has a patch that I have 
> tested, and for quite some time now, but it still does not appear in 
> mainline.
> 

Do you have a pointer to the maintainer and the patch, so that we can
update the bugzilla entry and ping the maintainer? 

Re: [Bug #16971] qla4xxx compile failure on 32-bit PowerPC: missing readq and writeq

[Florian Mickler]

On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:50:03 +0300 (EEST)
Meelis Roos <mroos-Y27EyoLml9s@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16971
> > Subject		: qla4xxx compile failure on 32-bit PowerPC: missing readq and writeq
> > Submitter	: Meelis Roos <mroos-Y27EyoLml9s@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2010-08-19 21:03 (33 days old)
> > Message-ID	: <alpine.SOC.1.00.1008192359310.19654-ptEonEWSGqKptlylMvRsHA@public.gmane.org>
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128225184900892&w=2
> 
> Still present. The maintainer of the driver has a patch that I have 
> tested, and for quite some time now, but it still does not appear in 
> mainline.
> 

Do you have a pointer to the maintainer and the patch, so that we can
update the bugzilla entry and ping the maintainer? 

Re: [Bug #16971] qla4xxx compile failure on 32-bit PowerPC: missing readq and writeq

[Meelis Roos]

> > > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16971
> > > Subject		: qla4xxx compile failure on 32-bit PowerPC: missing readq and writeq
> > > Submitter	: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
> > > Date		: 2010-08-19 21:03 (33 days old)
> > > Message-ID	: <alpine.SOC.1.00.1008192359310.19654@math.ut.ee>
> > > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128225184900892&w=2
> > 
> > Still present. The maintainer of the driver has a patch that I have 
> > tested, and for quite some time now, but it still does not appear in 
> > mainline.
> 
> Do you have a pointer to the maintainer and the patch, so that we can
> update the bugzilla entry and ping the maintainer? 

The patch was made by Vikas Chaudhary <vikas.chaudhary@qlogic.com> 
(CC:d) and sent to me by private me-mail. I was first dubious about 
possible endianness problem with qla4xxx private readq and writeq 
implementation but he told they forcefully tested it on PPC64 and it 
worked.

Last I heard from him on September 6th when he wrote he intended to push 
the patch upstream together with other patches the same week.

-- 
Meelis Roos (mroos@linux.ee)

Re: [Bug #16971] qla4xxx compile failure on 32-bit PowerPC: missing readq and writeq

[Meelis Roos]

> > > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16971
> > > Subject		: qla4xxx compile failure on 32-bit PowerPC: missing readq and writeq
> > > Submitter	: Meelis Roos <mroos-Y27EyoLml9s@public.gmane.org>
> > > Date		: 2010-08-19 21:03 (33 days old)
> > > Message-ID	: <alpine.SOC.1.00.1008192359310.19654-ptEonEWSGqKptlylMvRsHA@public.gmane.org>
> > > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128225184900892&w=2
> > 
> > Still present. The maintainer of the driver has a patch that I have 
> > tested, and for quite some time now, but it still does not appear in 
> > mainline.
> 
> Do you have a pointer to the maintainer and the patch, so that we can
> update the bugzilla entry and ping the maintainer? 

The patch was made by Vikas Chaudhary <vikas.chaudhary-h88ZbnxC6KDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 
(CC:d) and sent to me by private me-mail. I was first dubious about 
possible endianness problem with qla4xxx private readq and writeq 
implementation but he told they forcefully tested it on PPC64 and it 
worked.

Last I heard from him on September 6th when he wrote he intended to push 
the patch upstream together with other patches the same week.

-- 
Meelis Roos (mroos-Y27EyoLml9s@public.gmane.org)

Re: [Bug #18742] PROBLEM: Kernel panic on 2.6.36-rc4 when loading intel_ips on Core i3 laptop

[Jesse Barnes]

On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 21:08:06 +0200 (CEST)
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:

> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.35.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18742
> Subject		: PROBLEM: Kernel panic on 2.6.36-rc4 when loading intel_ips on Core i3 laptop
> Submitter	: infernix <infernix@infernix.net>
> Date		: 2010-09-15 14:35 (6 days old)
> Message-ID	: <4C90D998.6050103@infernix.net>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128456187928496&w=2

Just sent a patch to Matthew and the x86 driver list for this bug.

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center