All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [lm-sensors] Compiling 3.2.0
@ 2010-10-13 14:05 Andrey Repin
  2010-10-13 19:23 ` Jean Delvare
  2010-11-02 15:34 ` Andrey Repin
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrey Repin @ 2010-10-13 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

Greetings, All!

I've a kind of an issue. It was true for 3.1.2 and now for 3.2.0.
Programs building fine with exception of /prog/init/sensord.init - after
compilation, it retain all the @tokens@ typical for pre-configure scripts. But
as far as I can tell, the compilation does not involve configure process.
So, how to get past this?

P.S.
Ubuntu 8.4 "Hardy Heron", if that matters.


-- 
WBR,
 Andrey Repin (hell-for-yahoo@umail.ru) 13.10.2010, <18:02>

Sorry for my terrible english...


_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [lm-sensors] Compiling 3.2.0
  2010-10-13 14:05 [lm-sensors] Compiling 3.2.0 Andrey Repin
@ 2010-10-13 19:23 ` Jean Delvare
  2010-11-02 15:34 ` Andrey Repin
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2010-10-13 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

Hi Andrey,

On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:05:41 +0400, Andrey Repin wrote:
> I've a kind of an issue. It was true for 3.1.2 and now for 3.2.0.
> Programs building fine with exception of /prog/init/sensord.init - after
> compilation, it retain all the @tokens@ typical for pre-configure scripts. But
> as far as I can tell, the compilation does not involve configure process.
> So, how to get past this?

sensord.init isn't installed by default. It is there as legacy
documentation, and isn't actively maintained. As the header comment
says: "tested for RedHat 7.2 only". It even looks for odd module
aliases which I have never seen before, so this must pre-date my
involvement in the project, 8 years ago. So I'm pretty certain it
no longer works.

So I suggest that you simply forget about sensord.init. If nobody
objects, I'd even vote for deleting this old file to prevent further
confusion.

-- 
Jean Delvare

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [lm-sensors] Compiling 3.2.0
  2010-10-13 14:05 [lm-sensors] Compiling 3.2.0 Andrey Repin
  2010-10-13 19:23 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2010-11-02 15:34 ` Andrey Repin
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrey Repin @ 2010-11-02 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

Greetings, Andrey Repin!

> I've a kind of an issue. It was true for 3.1.2 and now for 3.2.0.
> Programs building fine with exception of /prog/init/sensord.init - after
> compilation, it retain all the @tokens@ typical for pre-configure scripts. But
> as far as I can tell, the compilation does not involve configure process.
> So, how to get past this?

Any answers?
Or does the absence of reaction implies that sensord is deprecated?


--
WBR,
 Andrey Repin (hell-for-yahoo@umail.ru) 02.11.2010, <18:33>

Sorry for my terrible english...


_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-11-02 15:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-10-13 14:05 [lm-sensors] Compiling 3.2.0 Andrey Repin
2010-10-13 19:23 ` Jean Delvare
2010-11-02 15:34 ` Andrey Repin

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.