All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Kosaki Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@google.com>,
	Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>,
	Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mlock: avoid dirtying pages and triggering writeback
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 08:37:02 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101118133702.GA18834@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101117231143.GQ22876@dastard>

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:11:43AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Hence I think that avoiding ->page_mkwrite callouts is likely to
> break some filesystems in subtle, undetected ways.  IMO, regardless
> of what is done, it would be really good to start by writing a new
> regression test to exercise and encode the expected the mlock
> behaviour so we can detect regressions later on....

I think it would help if we could drink a bit of the test driven design
coolaid here. Michel, can you write some testcases where pages on a
shared mapping are mlocked, then dirtied and then munlocked, and then
written out using msync/fsync.  Anything that fails this test on
btrfs/ext4/gfs/xfs/etc obviously doesn't work.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Kosaki Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@google.com>,
	Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>,
	Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mlock: avoid dirtying pages and triggering writeback
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 08:37:02 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101118133702.GA18834@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101117231143.GQ22876@dastard>

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:11:43AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Hence I think that avoiding ->page_mkwrite callouts is likely to
> break some filesystems in subtle, undetected ways.  IMO, regardless
> of what is done, it would be really good to start by writing a new
> regression test to exercise and encode the expected the mlock
> behaviour so we can detect regressions later on....

I think it would help if we could drink a bit of the test driven design
coolaid here. Michel, can you write some testcases where pages on a
shared mapping are mlocked, then dirtied and then munlocked, and then
written out using msync/fsync.  Anything that fails this test on
btrfs/ext4/gfs/xfs/etc obviously doesn't work.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-11-18 13:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-17 12:23 [PATCH 0/3] Avoid dirtying pages during mlock Michel Lespinasse
2010-11-17 12:23 ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-11-17 12:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] do_wp_page: remove the 'reuse' flag Michel Lespinasse
2010-11-17 12:23   ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-11-17 12:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] do_wp_page: clarify dirty_page handling Michel Lespinasse
2010-11-17 12:23   ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-11-17 12:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] mlock: avoid dirtying pages and triggering writeback Michel Lespinasse
2010-11-17 12:23   ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-11-17 12:57   ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-17 12:57     ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-17 15:28     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-17 15:28       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-17 22:05       ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-11-17 22:05         ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-11-17 22:18         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-17 22:18           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-17 23:11         ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-17 23:11           ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-17 23:31           ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-11-17 23:31             ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-11-19  1:46             ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-19  1:46               ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-17 23:52           ` Ted Ts'o
2010-11-17 23:52             ` Ted Ts'o
2010-11-18  0:53             ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-18  0:53               ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-18 11:03               ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-11-18 11:03                 ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-11-18 13:37           ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2010-11-18 13:37             ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-18 17:41             ` Hugh Dickins
2010-11-18 17:41               ` Hugh Dickins
2010-11-19  7:23               ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-11-19  7:23                 ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-11-19 13:38                 ` Theodore Tso
2010-11-19 13:42                 ` Theodore Tso
2010-11-19 13:42                   ` Theodore Tso
2010-11-19 15:06                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-19 15:06                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-19 22:54                 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-19 22:54                   ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-19 23:22                   ` Ted Ts'o
2010-11-19 23:22                     ` Ted Ts'o
2010-11-20  0:29                     ` Dustin Kirkland
2010-11-19 23:31                   ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-11-19 23:31                     ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-11-19 23:54                 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-19 23:54                   ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-18  5:46       ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-18  5:46         ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-18 10:43         ` Theodore Tso
2010-11-18 10:43           ` Theodore Tso
2010-11-18 13:39           ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-18 13:39             ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-18 18:00             ` Hugh Dickins
2010-11-18 18:00               ` Hugh Dickins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101118133702.GA18834@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mrubin@google.com \
    --cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=suleiman@google.com \
    --cc=tytso@google.com \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.