All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
	patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
	linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 1/2] PM: Prototype the pm_generic_ operations
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:15:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201012221315.06948.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101222114316.GA4520@sirena.org.uk>

On Wednesday, December 22, 2010, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:08:58PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > I'd take this one, but the second one depends on it.
> 
> > I can take both if Jean agrees.
> 
> Given the nearness of the merge window another option is to apply this
> one now and punt the I2C one until 2.6.38, I guess?

Except that I don't have any more fixes for 2.6.37 pending
and this one isn't really a fix. :-)

If there's anything else I should push to Linus before 2.6.37, I'll
include this patch in the pull request.  Otherwise I think it shoul go in
during the merge window.

Thanks,
Rafael

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
To: Mark Brown
	<broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
	patches-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-pm-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 1/2] PM: Prototype the pm_generic_ operations
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:15:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201012221315.06948.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101222114316.GA4520-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>

On Wednesday, December 22, 2010, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:08:58PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > I'd take this one, but the second one depends on it.
> 
> > I can take both if Jean agrees.
> 
> Given the nearness of the merge window another option is to apply this
> one now and punt the I2C one until 2.6.38, I guess?

Except that I don't have any more fixes for 2.6.37 pending
and this one isn't really a fix. :-)

If there's anything else I should push to Linus before 2.6.37, I'll
include this patch in the pull request.  Otherwise I think it shoul go in
during the merge window.

Thanks,
Rafael

  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-22 12:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-20 14:33 [PATCH 1/2] PM: Prototype the pm_generic_ operations Mark Brown
2010-12-20 14:33 ` Mark Brown
2010-12-20 14:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] i2c: Factor out runtime suspend checks from PM operations Mark Brown
2010-12-20 14:33 ` Mark Brown
2010-12-22 15:10   ` [linux-pm] " Rabin Vincent
2010-12-22 15:10     ` Rabin Vincent
2010-12-22 15:25     ` Mark Brown
2010-12-22 15:25       ` Mark Brown
2010-12-22 21:08       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-22 21:08         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-22 21:08       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-22 15:25     ` Mark Brown
2010-12-22 15:10   ` Rabin Vincent
2010-12-20 21:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] PM: Prototype the pm_generic_ operations Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-20 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-20 21:08   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-22 11:43   ` [linux-pm] " Mark Brown
2010-12-22 11:43     ` Mark Brown
2010-12-22 12:15     ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2010-12-22 12:15       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-22 12:19       ` Mark Brown
2010-12-22 12:19       ` [linux-pm] " Mark Brown
2010-12-22 12:19         ` Mark Brown
2010-12-22 12:15     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-22 11:43   ` Mark Brown
2010-12-24 14:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-24 14:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-24 14:08   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201012221315.06948.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.