From: Bruno Randolf <br1@einfach.org>
To: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vasanth@atheros.com>
Cc: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>,
"linville@tuxdriver.com" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
"ath5k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net" <ath5k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] ath: Fix WEP hardware encryption
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:19:31 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201101271819.31727.br1@einfach.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110127055105.GA23779@vasanth-laptop>
On Thu January 27 2011 14:51:05 Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 04:06:02PM +0530, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> > On Wed January 26 2011 18:37:00 Jouni Malinen wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:38:53AM +0900, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> > > > Even without my patch, WEP does not work with multiple vifs.
> > >
> > > Are you sure about that?
> >
> > Yes, I'm sure. Please test it yourself, if you don't believe me. :)
> > I'm using ath5k, not ath9k, BTW.
>
> Using a key cache entry without seeing it's availability would
> certainly break multi vif operation with WEP in at least one
> interface. Did you test the following
>
> 1. Associate sta vif1 with TKIP and
> 2. Bring up ap vif2 with WEP and configure the key at index 1.
>
> With your patch, the AP wep key would probably override the GTK of STA
> interface.
Ok, right. I have to admit that i did not think about this case and just about
multiple AP interfaces. So please just drop my patch for now.
bruno
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-27 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-25 4:15 [PATCH 1/6] ath5k: ath5k_setup_channels cleanup and whitespace Bruno Randolf
2011-01-25 4:15 ` [PATCH 2/6] ath5k: Use local variable for capabilities Bruno Randolf
2011-01-25 4:15 ` [PATCH 3/6] ath: Add function to check if 4.9GHz channels are allowed Bruno Randolf
2011-01-25 4:15 ` [PATCH 4/6] ath5k: Enable 802.11j 4.9GHz frequencies Bruno Randolf
2011-01-25 4:15 ` [PATCH 5/6] ath9k: Remove unused IEEE80211_WEP_NKID Bruno Randolf
2011-01-25 4:15 ` [PATCH 6/6] ath: Fix WEP hardware encryption Bruno Randolf
2011-01-25 18:32 ` Jouni Malinen
2011-01-26 2:38 ` Bruno Randolf
2011-01-26 8:29 ` Johannes Berg
2011-01-26 9:21 ` [ath5k-devel] " Bruno Randolf
2011-01-26 9:23 ` Johannes Berg
2011-01-26 9:37 ` Jouni Malinen
2011-01-26 10:36 ` Bruno Randolf
2011-01-27 5:51 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2011-01-27 9:19 ` Bruno Randolf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201101271819.31727.br1@einfach.org \
--to=br1@einfach.org \
--cc=ath5k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net \
--cc=j@w1.fi \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=vasanth@atheros.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.