All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: dilinger@queued.net, sodaville@linutronix.de,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH TIP 02/14] x86: Add device tree support
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:27:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110216212746.GB22837@angua.secretlab.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110124043427.GA20274@www.tglx.de>

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:04:27AM +0530, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * Sebastian Andrzej Siewior | 2011-01-24 09:58:50 [+0530]:
> 
> >This patch adds minimal support for device tree support on x86. It will
> >be passed to the kernel via setup_data which requires atleast boot
> >protocol 2.09.
> >Memory size, restricted memory regions, boot arguments are gathered the
> >traditional way so things like cmd_line are just here to let the code
> >compile.
> >The current plan is use the device tree as an extension and to gather
> >informations from it which can not be enumerated and have to be
> >hardcoded otherwise. This includes things like
> >- which devices are on this I2C/ SPI bus?
> >- how are the interrupts wired to IO APIC?
> >- where could my hpet be?
> >
> 
> Andres, this patch moves some of the OF defines you added for OLPC from
> irq.c to prom.c which requires CONFIG_X86_OF to be enabled. A later

Why not simply make prom.c depend on CONFIG_OF?  There is no need to
have an x86 specific config value for enabling devicetree code.

> patch changes irq_create_of_mapping() from returning intspec[0] to
> actually doing something. Could you please check how of OLPC gets broken
> and what we could do about it? :)
> 
> Sebastian
> _______________________________________________
> devicetree-discuss mailing list
> devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
	<bigeasy-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: sodaville-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
	x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	dilinger-pFFUokh25LWsTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH TIP 02/14] x86: Add device tree support
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:27:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110216212746.GB22837@angua.secretlab.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110124043427.GA20274-Hfxr4Dq0UpYb1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org>

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:04:27AM +0530, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * Sebastian Andrzej Siewior | 2011-01-24 09:58:50 [+0530]:
> 
> >This patch adds minimal support for device tree support on x86. It will
> >be passed to the kernel via setup_data which requires atleast boot
> >protocol 2.09.
> >Memory size, restricted memory regions, boot arguments are gathered the
> >traditional way so things like cmd_line are just here to let the code
> >compile.
> >The current plan is use the device tree as an extension and to gather
> >informations from it which can not be enumerated and have to be
> >hardcoded otherwise. This includes things like
> >- which devices are on this I2C/ SPI bus?
> >- how are the interrupts wired to IO APIC?
> >- where could my hpet be?
> >
> 
> Andres, this patch moves some of the OF defines you added for OLPC from
> irq.c to prom.c which requires CONFIG_X86_OF to be enabled. A later

Why not simply make prom.c depend on CONFIG_OF?  There is no need to
have an x86 specific config value for enabling devicetree code.

> patch changes irq_create_of_mapping() from returning intspec[0] to
> actually doing something. Could you please check how of OLPC gets broken
> and what we could do about it? :)
> 
> Sebastian
> _______________________________________________
> devicetree-discuss mailing list
> devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-16 21:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-24  4:28 Device tree on x86, part v3 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-01-24  4:28 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-01-24  4:28 ` [PATCH TIP 01/14] x86/e820: remove conditional early mapping in parse_e820_ext Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-01-24  4:28   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-02-03 20:57   ` Grant Likely
2011-01-24  4:28 ` [PATCH TIP 02/14] x86: Add device tree support Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-01-24  4:28   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-01-24  4:34   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-01-24  4:34     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-02-16 21:27     ` Grant Likely [this message]
2011-02-16 21:27       ` Grant Likely
2011-02-17 11:05       ` [sodaville] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-02-17 11:05         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-02-16 21:26   ` Grant Likely
2011-02-17 11:03     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-02-17 11:03       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-02-16 21:31   ` Grant Likely
2011-02-16 21:31     ` Grant Likely
2011-02-17 11:31     ` [sodaville] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-02-17 11:31       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-02-17 17:02       ` Grant Likely
2011-01-24  4:28 ` [PATCH TIP 03/14] x86/dtb: Add a device tree for CE4100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-01-24  4:28   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-01-27  5:00   ` David Gibson
2011-01-27  5:00     ` David Gibson
2011-01-27  9:11     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-01-27  9:11       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-02-03 20:59       ` Grant Likely
2011-02-03 21:32         ` Mitch Bradley
2011-02-03 21:32           ` Mitch Bradley
2011-02-04  9:40           ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-02-04  9:40             ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-02-02 18:58     ` [PATCH TIP v2 " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-02-02 18:58       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-02-03 21:07       ` Grant Likely
2011-02-03 21:07         ` Grant Likely
2011-02-04 10:06         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-02-04 10:06           ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-02-16 21:44       ` Grant Likely
2011-02-16 21:44         ` Grant Likely
2011-02-22 11:21         ` [sodaville] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-02-22 11:21           ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-01-24  4:28 ` [PATCH TIP 04/14] x86/dtb: add irq domain abstraction Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-01-24  4:28   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-01-24  4:28 ` [PATCH TIP 05/14] x86/dtb: add early parsing of APIC and IO APIC Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-01-24  4:28   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-02-16 21:47   ` Grant Likely
2011-02-16 21:47     ` Grant Likely
2011-01-24  4:28 ` [PATCH TIP 06/14] x86/dtb: add support hpet Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-01-24  4:28   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-01-24  4:28 ` [PATCH OF 07/14] of: move of_irq_map_pci() into generic code Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-01-24  4:28   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-02-10 13:57   ` Michal Simek
2011-02-16 21:53   ` Grant Likely
2011-02-16 21:53     ` Grant Likely
2011-02-17  7:49     ` Michal Simek
2011-02-17  7:49       ` Michal Simek
2011-02-17  7:49       ` Michal Simek
2011-01-24  4:28 ` [PATCH TIP 08/14] x86/dtb: add support for PCI devices backed by dtb nodes Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-01-24  4:28   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-02-16 21:59   ` Grant Likely
2011-02-16 21:59     ` Grant Likely
2011-02-22 11:21     ` [sodaville] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-02-22 11:21       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-01-24  4:28 ` [PATCH TIP 09/14] x86/dtb: Add generic bus probe Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-01-24  4:28   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-02-04 10:21   ` [PATCH v2 " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-02-04 10:21     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-02-16 22:04     ` Grant Likely
2011-02-16 22:04       ` Grant Likely
2011-01-24  4:28 ` [PATCH TIP 10/14] x86/ioapic: Add OF bindings for IO-APIC Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-01-24  4:28   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-02-16 22:04   ` Grant Likely
2011-01-24  4:28 ` [PATCH TIP 11/14] x86/ce4100: use OF for ioapic Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-01-24  4:28   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-01-24  4:29 ` [PATCH OF 12/14] x86/rtc: don't register rtc if we the DT blob Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-01-24  4:29   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-02-16 22:08   ` Grant Likely
2011-02-16 22:08     ` Grant Likely
2011-02-16 22:09   ` Grant Likely
2011-02-16 22:09     ` Grant Likely
2011-02-17 13:13     ` [sodaville] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-02-17 13:13       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-01-24  4:29 ` [PATCH OF 13/14] rtc/cmos: add OF bindings Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-01-24  4:29   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-01-24  4:38   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-01-24  4:38     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-02-16 22:11   ` Grant Likely
2011-02-16 22:11     ` Grant Likely
2011-02-17 13:26     ` [sodaville] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-02-17 13:26       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-02-17 16:46       ` Grant Likely
2011-01-24  4:29 ` [PATCH TIP 14/14] x86/pci: remove warning Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-01-24  4:29   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110216212746.GB22837@angua.secretlab.ca \
    --to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=dilinger@queued.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sodaville@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.