* [PATCH 1/1] ARM: imx53: correct Silicon Revision definition following fuse map
@ 2011-02-18 5:47 Richard Zhao
2011-02-18 7:07 ` Baruch Siach
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Richard Zhao @ 2011-02-18 5:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@freescale.com>
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/cpu.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/cpu.c
index d40671d..95fd5f8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/cpu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/cpu.c
@@ -76,13 +76,25 @@ late_initcall(mx51_neon_fixup);
static int get_mx53_srev(void)
{
void __iomem *iim_base = MX51_IO_ADDRESS(MX53_IIM_BASE_ADDR);
- u32 rev = readl(iim_base + IIM_SREV) & 0xff;
+ u32 reg = readl(iim_base + IIM_SREV) & 0xff;
+ int rev;
+
+ switch (reg) {
+ case 0x0:
+ rev = IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_0;
+ break;
+ case 0x2:
+ rev = IMX_CHIP_REVISION_2_0;
+ break;
+ case 0x3:
+ rev = IMX_CHIP_REVISION_2_1;
+ break;
+ default:
+ rev = IMX_CHIP_REVISION_UNKNOWN;
+ break;
+ }
- if (rev == 0x0)
- return IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_0;
- else if (rev == 0x10)
- return IMX_CHIP_REVISION_2_0;
- return 0;
+ return rev;
}
/*
--
1.7.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/1] ARM: imx53: correct Silicon Revision definition following fuse map
2011-02-18 5:47 [PATCH 1/1] ARM: imx53: correct Silicon Revision definition following fuse map Richard Zhao
@ 2011-02-18 7:07 ` Baruch Siach
2011-02-18 9:01 ` Richard Zhao
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Baruch Siach @ 2011-02-18 7:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi Richard,
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 01:47:29PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@freescale.com>
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/cpu.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/cpu.c
> index d40671d..95fd5f8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/cpu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/cpu.c
> @@ -76,13 +76,25 @@ late_initcall(mx51_neon_fixup);
> static int get_mx53_srev(void)
> {
> void __iomem *iim_base = MX51_IO_ADDRESS(MX53_IIM_BASE_ADDR);
> - u32 rev = readl(iim_base + IIM_SREV) & 0xff;
> + u32 reg = readl(iim_base + IIM_SREV) & 0xff;
> + int rev;
> +
> + switch (reg) {
> + case 0x0:
> + rev = IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_0;
> + break;
> + case 0x2:
> + rev = IMX_CHIP_REVISION_2_0;
> + break;
> + case 0x3:
> + rev = IMX_CHIP_REVISION_2_1;
> + break;
> + default:
> + rev = IMX_CHIP_REVISION_UNKNOWN;
> + break;
> + }
>
> - if (rev == 0x0)
> - return IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_0;
> - else if (rev == 0x10)
> - return IMX_CHIP_REVISION_2_0;
> - return 0;
> + return rev;
> }
>
> /*
I think the following code is shorter and more readable:
switch (reg) {
case 0x0:
return IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_0;
case 0x2:
return IMX_CHIP_REVISION_2_0;
case 0x3:
return IMX_CHIP_REVISION_2_1;
default:
return IMX_CHIP_REVISION_UNKNOWN;
}
baruch
--
~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/1] ARM: imx53: correct Silicon Revision definition following fuse map
2011-02-18 7:07 ` Baruch Siach
@ 2011-02-18 9:01 ` Richard Zhao
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Richard Zhao @ 2011-02-18 9:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi Baruch,
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:07:52AM +0200, Baruch Siach wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 01:47:29PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@freescale.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/cpu.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/cpu.c
> > index d40671d..95fd5f8 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/cpu.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/cpu.c
> > @@ -76,13 +76,25 @@ late_initcall(mx51_neon_fixup);
> > static int get_mx53_srev(void)
> > {
> > void __iomem *iim_base = MX51_IO_ADDRESS(MX53_IIM_BASE_ADDR);
> > - u32 rev = readl(iim_base + IIM_SREV) & 0xff;
> > + u32 reg = readl(iim_base + IIM_SREV) & 0xff;
> > + int rev;
> > +
> > + switch (reg) {
> > + case 0x0:
> > + rev = IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_0;
> > + break;
> > + case 0x2:
> > + rev = IMX_CHIP_REVISION_2_0;
> > + break;
> > + case 0x3:
> > + rev = IMX_CHIP_REVISION_2_1;
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + rev = IMX_CHIP_REVISION_UNKNOWN;
> > + break;
> > + }
> >
> > - if (rev == 0x0)
> > - return IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_0;
> > - else if (rev == 0x10)
> > - return IMX_CHIP_REVISION_2_0;
> > - return 0;
> > + return rev;
> > }
> >
> > /*
>
> I think the following code is shorter and more readable:
>
> switch (reg) {
> case 0x0:
> return IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_0;
> case 0x2:
> return IMX_CHIP_REVISION_2_0;
> case 0x3:
> return IMX_CHIP_REVISION_2_1;
> default:
> return IMX_CHIP_REVISION_UNKNOWN;
> }
Yes. I thought there would be compile warning, but not.
Thanks
Richard
>
> baruch
>
>
> --
> ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
> =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
> - baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-18 9:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-18 5:47 [PATCH 1/1] ARM: imx53: correct Silicon Revision definition following fuse map Richard Zhao
2011-02-18 7:07 ` Baruch Siach
2011-02-18 9:01 ` Richard Zhao
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.