All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
	kgene.kim@samsung.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Samsung: Move Samsung SoCs GPIO drivers to drivers/gpio
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 00:31:28 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110520063128.GA21285@ponder.secretlab.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110520054441.GA9952@july>

On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 02:44:41PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> The following changes since commit 61c4f2c81c61f73549928dfd9f3e8f26aa36a8cf:
> 
>   Linux 2.6.39 (2011-05-18 21:06:34 -0700)
> 
> Kyungmin Park (4):
>       Move to Samsung common GPIO library to drivers/gpio
>       Move the exynos4 GPIO to drivers/gpio
>       Move the s5pv210 GPIO to drivers/gpio
>       Move the s5pc100 GPIO to drivers/gpio
> 
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Makefile                     |    2 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/Makefile                     |    2 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile                     |    2 +-
>  arch/arm/plat-samsung/Makefile                     |    1 -
>  drivers/gpio/Kconfig                               |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpio/Makefile                              |    4 +++
>  .../gpiolib.c => drivers/gpio/exynos4-gpio.c       |    0
>  .../gpiolib.c => drivers/gpio/s5pc100-gpio.c       |    0
>  .../gpiolib.c => drivers/gpio/s5pv210-gpio.c       |    0
>  .../gpiolib.c => drivers/gpio/samsung-gpiolib.c    |    3 +-

drivers/gpio/gpio-*.c please.  I'm starting to enforce some level of
naming convention.

>  10 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>  rename arch/arm/mach-exynos4/gpiolib.c => drivers/gpio/exynos4-gpio.c (100%)
>  rename arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/gpiolib.c => drivers/gpio/s5pc100-gpio.c (100%)
>  rename arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/gpiolib.c => drivers/gpio/s5pv210-gpio.c (100%)
>  rename arch/arm/plat-samsung/gpiolib.c => drivers/gpio/samsung-gpiolib.c (99%)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Makefile
> index 9be104f..3bb3f57 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Makefile
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ obj-				:=
>  # Core support for EXYNOS4 system
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_EXYNOS4210)	+= cpu.o init.o clock.o irq-combiner.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_EXYNOS4210)	+= setup-i2c0.o gpiolib.o irq-eint.o dma.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_EXYNOS4210)	+= setup-i2c0.o irq-eint.o dma.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PM)		+= pm.o sleep.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ)		+= cpufreq.o
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/Makefile
> index eecab57..a5e6e60 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/Makefile
> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ obj-				:=
>  
>  # Core support for S5PC100 system
>  
> -obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_S5PC100)	+= cpu.o init.o clock.o gpiolib.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_S5PC100)	+= cpu.o init.o clock.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_S5PC100)	+= setup-i2c0.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_S5PC100)	+= dma.o
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile
> index 11f1790..50907ac 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile
> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ obj-				:=
>  
>  # Core support for S5PV210 system
>  
> -obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_S5PV210)	+= cpu.o init.o clock.o dma.o gpiolib.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_S5PV210)	+= cpu.o init.o clock.o dma.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_S5PV210)	+= setup-i2c0.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_S5PV210_PM)	+= pm.o sleep.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ)		+= cpufreq.o
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Makefile b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Makefile
> index e9de58a..53eb15b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Makefile
> @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ obj-y				+= gpio.o
>  obj-y				+= gpio-config.o
>  obj-y				+= dev-asocdma.o
>  
> -obj-$(CONFIG_SAMSUNG_GPIOLIB_4BIT)	+= gpiolib.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SAMSUNG_CLKSRC)	+= clock-clksrc.o
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SAMSUNG_IRQ_UART)	+= irq-uart.o
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> index d3b2953..d838f5b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> @@ -75,6 +75,30 @@ config GPIO_BASIC_MMIO
>  	help
>  	  Say yes here to support basic memory-mapped GPIO controllers.
>  
> +config GPIO_EXYNOS4
> +	bool "Samsung Exynos4 GPIO library support"
> +	default y if CPU_EXYNOS4210
> +	help
> +	  Say yes here to support Samsung Exynos4 series SoCs GPIO library
> +
> +config GPIO_SAMSUNG
> +	bool "Samsung SoCs GPIO library support"
> +	default y if SAMSUNG_GPIOLIB_4BIT
> +	help
> +	  Say yes here to support Samsung SoCs GPIO library
> +
> +config GPIO_S5PC100
> +	bool "Samsung S5PC100 GPIO library support"
> +	default y if CPU_S5PC100
> +	help
> +	  Say yes here to support Samsung S5PC100 SoC GPIO library
> +
> +config GPIO_S5PV210
> +	bool "Samsung S5PV210/S5PC110 GPIO library support"
> +	default y if CPU_S5PV210
> +	help
> +	  Say yes here to support Samsung S5PV210/S5PC110 SoC GPIO library
> +

Is there any scenario where these drivers should be user selected?  My
feel is that the right thing to do with gpio controllers is to just
build them in when the platform is selected.  We can always add
Kconfig entries later if this assumption changes.

>  config GPIO_IT8761E
>  	tristate "IT8761E GPIO support"
>  	depends on GPIOLIB
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Makefile b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
> index becef59..738386f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
> @@ -11,6 +11,10 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GPIOLIB)		+= gpiolib.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ADP5520)	+= adp5520-gpio.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ADP5588)	+= adp5588-gpio.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_BASIC_MMIO)	+= basic_mmio_gpio.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_EXYNOS4)	+= exynos4-gpio.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_SAMSUNG)	+= samsung-gpiolib.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_S5PC100)	+= s5pc100-gpio.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_S5PV210)	+= s5pv210-gpio.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_LANGWELL)	+= langwell_gpio.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_MAX730X)	+= max730x.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_MAX7300)	+= max7300.o
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/exynos4-gpio.c
> similarity index 100%
> rename from arch/arm/mach-exynos4/gpiolib.c
> rename to drivers/gpio/exynos4-gpio.c
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/s5pc100-gpio.c
> similarity index 100%
> rename from arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/gpiolib.c
> rename to drivers/gpio/s5pc100-gpio.c
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/s5pv210-gpio.c
> similarity index 100%
> rename from arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/gpiolib.c
> rename to drivers/gpio/s5pv210-gpio.c
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/samsung-gpiolib.c
> similarity index 99%
> rename from arch/arm/plat-samsung/gpiolib.c
> rename to drivers/gpio/samsung-gpiolib.c
> index ea37c04..925b66e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/gpiolib.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/samsung-gpiolib.c
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> -/* arch/arm/plat-samsung/gpiolib.c
> +/*
> + * drivers/gpio/samsung-gpiolib.c

My preference is to just drop the filename from the header entirely.
A better thing here would be a single line description of what this
file actually does.

g.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: grant.likely@secretlab.ca (Grant Likely)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] Samsung: Move Samsung SoCs GPIO drivers to drivers/gpio
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 00:31:28 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110520063128.GA21285@ponder.secretlab.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110520054441.GA9952@july>

On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 02:44:41PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> The following changes since commit 61c4f2c81c61f73549928dfd9f3e8f26aa36a8cf:
> 
>   Linux 2.6.39 (2011-05-18 21:06:34 -0700)
> 
> Kyungmin Park (4):
>       Move to Samsung common GPIO library to drivers/gpio
>       Move the exynos4 GPIO to drivers/gpio
>       Move the s5pv210 GPIO to drivers/gpio
>       Move the s5pc100 GPIO to drivers/gpio
> 
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Makefile                     |    2 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/Makefile                     |    2 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile                     |    2 +-
>  arch/arm/plat-samsung/Makefile                     |    1 -
>  drivers/gpio/Kconfig                               |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpio/Makefile                              |    4 +++
>  .../gpiolib.c => drivers/gpio/exynos4-gpio.c       |    0
>  .../gpiolib.c => drivers/gpio/s5pc100-gpio.c       |    0
>  .../gpiolib.c => drivers/gpio/s5pv210-gpio.c       |    0
>  .../gpiolib.c => drivers/gpio/samsung-gpiolib.c    |    3 +-

drivers/gpio/gpio-*.c please.  I'm starting to enforce some level of
naming convention.

>  10 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>  rename arch/arm/mach-exynos4/gpiolib.c => drivers/gpio/exynos4-gpio.c (100%)
>  rename arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/gpiolib.c => drivers/gpio/s5pc100-gpio.c (100%)
>  rename arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/gpiolib.c => drivers/gpio/s5pv210-gpio.c (100%)
>  rename arch/arm/plat-samsung/gpiolib.c => drivers/gpio/samsung-gpiolib.c (99%)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Makefile
> index 9be104f..3bb3f57 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Makefile
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ obj-				:=
>  # Core support for EXYNOS4 system
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_EXYNOS4210)	+= cpu.o init.o clock.o irq-combiner.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_EXYNOS4210)	+= setup-i2c0.o gpiolib.o irq-eint.o dma.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_EXYNOS4210)	+= setup-i2c0.o irq-eint.o dma.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PM)		+= pm.o sleep.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ)		+= cpufreq.o
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/Makefile
> index eecab57..a5e6e60 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/Makefile
> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ obj-				:=
>  
>  # Core support for S5PC100 system
>  
> -obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_S5PC100)	+= cpu.o init.o clock.o gpiolib.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_S5PC100)	+= cpu.o init.o clock.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_S5PC100)	+= setup-i2c0.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_S5PC100)	+= dma.o
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile
> index 11f1790..50907ac 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile
> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ obj-				:=
>  
>  # Core support for S5PV210 system
>  
> -obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_S5PV210)	+= cpu.o init.o clock.o dma.o gpiolib.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_S5PV210)	+= cpu.o init.o clock.o dma.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_S5PV210)	+= setup-i2c0.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_S5PV210_PM)	+= pm.o sleep.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ)		+= cpufreq.o
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Makefile b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Makefile
> index e9de58a..53eb15b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Makefile
> @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ obj-y				+= gpio.o
>  obj-y				+= gpio-config.o
>  obj-y				+= dev-asocdma.o
>  
> -obj-$(CONFIG_SAMSUNG_GPIOLIB_4BIT)	+= gpiolib.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SAMSUNG_CLKSRC)	+= clock-clksrc.o
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SAMSUNG_IRQ_UART)	+= irq-uart.o
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> index d3b2953..d838f5b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> @@ -75,6 +75,30 @@ config GPIO_BASIC_MMIO
>  	help
>  	  Say yes here to support basic memory-mapped GPIO controllers.
>  
> +config GPIO_EXYNOS4
> +	bool "Samsung Exynos4 GPIO library support"
> +	default y if CPU_EXYNOS4210
> +	help
> +	  Say yes here to support Samsung Exynos4 series SoCs GPIO library
> +
> +config GPIO_SAMSUNG
> +	bool "Samsung SoCs GPIO library support"
> +	default y if SAMSUNG_GPIOLIB_4BIT
> +	help
> +	  Say yes here to support Samsung SoCs GPIO library
> +
> +config GPIO_S5PC100
> +	bool "Samsung S5PC100 GPIO library support"
> +	default y if CPU_S5PC100
> +	help
> +	  Say yes here to support Samsung S5PC100 SoC GPIO library
> +
> +config GPIO_S5PV210
> +	bool "Samsung S5PV210/S5PC110 GPIO library support"
> +	default y if CPU_S5PV210
> +	help
> +	  Say yes here to support Samsung S5PV210/S5PC110 SoC GPIO library
> +

Is there any scenario where these drivers should be user selected?  My
feel is that the right thing to do with gpio controllers is to just
build them in when the platform is selected.  We can always add
Kconfig entries later if this assumption changes.

>  config GPIO_IT8761E
>  	tristate "IT8761E GPIO support"
>  	depends on GPIOLIB
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Makefile b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
> index becef59..738386f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
> @@ -11,6 +11,10 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GPIOLIB)		+= gpiolib.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ADP5520)	+= adp5520-gpio.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ADP5588)	+= adp5588-gpio.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_BASIC_MMIO)	+= basic_mmio_gpio.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_EXYNOS4)	+= exynos4-gpio.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_SAMSUNG)	+= samsung-gpiolib.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_S5PC100)	+= s5pc100-gpio.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_S5PV210)	+= s5pv210-gpio.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_LANGWELL)	+= langwell_gpio.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_MAX730X)	+= max730x.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_MAX7300)	+= max7300.o
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/exynos4-gpio.c
> similarity index 100%
> rename from arch/arm/mach-exynos4/gpiolib.c
> rename to drivers/gpio/exynos4-gpio.c
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/s5pc100-gpio.c
> similarity index 100%
> rename from arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/gpiolib.c
> rename to drivers/gpio/s5pc100-gpio.c
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/s5pv210-gpio.c
> similarity index 100%
> rename from arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/gpiolib.c
> rename to drivers/gpio/s5pv210-gpio.c
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/samsung-gpiolib.c
> similarity index 99%
> rename from arch/arm/plat-samsung/gpiolib.c
> rename to drivers/gpio/samsung-gpiolib.c
> index ea37c04..925b66e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/gpiolib.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/samsung-gpiolib.c
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> -/* arch/arm/plat-samsung/gpiolib.c
> +/*
> + * drivers/gpio/samsung-gpiolib.c

My preference is to just drop the filename from the header entirely.
A better thing here would be a single line description of what this
file actually does.

g.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-20  6:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-20  5:44 [PATCH 0/4] Samsung: Move Samsung SoCs GPIO drivers to drivers/gpio Kyungmin Park
2011-05-20  5:44 ` Kyungmin Park
2011-05-20  6:31 ` Grant Likely [this message]
2011-05-20  6:31   ` Grant Likely
2011-05-21 11:21   ` Mark Brown
2011-05-21 11:21     ` Mark Brown
2011-05-27  3:22     ` Grant Likely
2011-05-27  3:22       ` Grant Likely
2011-05-27  5:01       ` Mark Brown
2011-05-27  5:01         ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110520063128.GA21285@ponder.secretlab.ca \
    --to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=kmpark@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.