All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Prasad <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hw_breakpoint: Let the user choose not to build it (and perf too)
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 11:27:23 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110525022723.GE14329@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1306273947-8410-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:52:21PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Mostly just a rebase against latest upstream
> updates and acks from Will Deacon added In this second version.
> 
> Please tell me if you are ok with this set.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> ---
> 
> Frederic Weisbecker (6):
>       hw_breakpoints: Split hardware breakpoints config
>       hw_breakpoints: Migrate breakpoint conditional build under new config
>       x86: Allow the user not to build hw_breakpoints
>       hw_breakpoints: Breakpoints arch ability don't need perf events
>       hw_breakpoints: Only force perf events if breakpoints are selected
>       hw_breakpoints: Drop remaining misplaced dependency on perf
> 
The series looks good to me:

Acked-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Prasad <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hw_breakpoint: Let the user choose not to build it (and perf too)
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 11:27:23 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110525022723.GE14329@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1306273947-8410-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:52:21PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Mostly just a rebase against latest upstream
> updates and acks from Will Deacon added In this second version.
> 
> Please tell me if you are ok with this set.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> ---
> 
> Frederic Weisbecker (6):
>       hw_breakpoints: Split hardware breakpoints config
>       hw_breakpoints: Migrate breakpoint conditional build under new config
>       x86: Allow the user not to build hw_breakpoints
>       hw_breakpoints: Breakpoints arch ability don't need perf events
>       hw_breakpoints: Only force perf events if breakpoints are selected
>       hw_breakpoints: Drop remaining misplaced dependency on perf
> 
The series looks good to me:

Acked-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-05-25  2:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-24 21:52 [PATCH v2] hw_breakpoint: Let the user choose not to build it (and perf too) Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-24 21:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-24 21:52 ` [PATCH 1/6] hw_breakpoints: Split hardware breakpoints config Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-24 21:52   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-24 21:52 ` [PATCH 2/6] hw_breakpoints: Migrate breakpoint conditional build under new config Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-24 21:52   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-04 13:27   ` K.Prasad
2011-07-04 13:27     ` K.Prasad
2011-07-04 13:29     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-04 13:29       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-04 17:44       ` K.Prasad
2011-07-05 13:49         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-24 21:52 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86: Allow the user not to build hw_breakpoints Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-24 21:52   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-24 21:52 ` [PATCH 4/6] hw_breakpoints: Breakpoints arch ability don't need perf events Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-24 21:52   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-04 13:32   ` K.Prasad
2011-07-04 13:32     ` K.Prasad
2011-07-04 13:37     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-04 13:37       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-24 21:52 ` [PATCH 5/6] hw_breakpoints: Only force perf events if breakpoints are selected Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-24 21:52   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-24 21:52 ` [PATCH 6/6] hw_breakpoints: Drop remaining misplaced dependency on perf Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-24 21:52   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-25  2:27 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2011-05-25  2:27   ` [PATCH v2] hw_breakpoint: Let the user choose not to build it (and perf too) Paul Mundt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110525022723.GE14329@linux-sh.org \
    --to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.