From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [tip:core/rcu] Revert "rcu: Decrease memory-barrier usage based on semi-formal proof"
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 09:18:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110525071816.GG429@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DDC4992.2020505@kernel.org>
* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> >> got:
> >>
> >> [ 32.803704] cpu_dev_init done
> >> [ 99.171292] memory_dev_init done
> >
> > So the difference between these two is noise, I hope. Adding a static
> > inline function that is not used should not have an effect on performance.
> > Still, the difference between 6 seconds and 60 seconds rises far above
> > this noise level, so the big differences are likely quite real.
>
> could be softirq to kthread change...
Softirq processing can be pretty nondeterministic (for example there's no
guarantee that we process all softirqs) - but kthreads ought to be pretty
deterministic. Weird.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-25 7:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <tip-80d02085d99039b3b7f3a73c8896226b0cb1ba07@git.kernel.org>
2011-05-20 21:04 ` [tip:core/rcu] Revert "rcu: Decrease memory-barrier usage based on semi-formal proof" Yinghai Lu
2011-05-20 22:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-20 23:09 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-20 23:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-20 23:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-20 23:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-21 0:02 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-21 13:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-21 14:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-23 20:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-23 21:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-23 22:01 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-23 22:55 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-23 22:58 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-24 1:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-24 1:26 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-24 1:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-24 21:23 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-25 0:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-25 0:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-25 4:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-25 7:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-25 20:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-25 7:18 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-05-25 0:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-25 0:10 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-25 4:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-25 7:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-25 20:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-25 20:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-25 22:15 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-25 22:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-25 22:49 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-26 1:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-26 1:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-26 6:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-26 14:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-26 17:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-26 20:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-26 15:08 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-26 16:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-28 1:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-28 4:03 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-28 6:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-24 1:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110525071816.GG429@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.