All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [tip:core/rcu] Revert "rcu: Decrease memory-barrier usage based on semi-formal proof"
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 15:58:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DDAE6A5.6060701@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DDAE5FA.2030303@kernel.org>

On 05/23/2011 03:55 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On 05/23/2011 03:01 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On 05/23/2011 02:25 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 01:14:22PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>> On 05/21/2011 07:08 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 06:18:44AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 05:02:40PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>>>>> On 05/20/2011 04:49 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 04:16:28PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> the same one i sent out before, but let DEBUG_LOCKING_API_SELFTESTS disabled.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> OK, just to make sure I understand...  You are compiling exactly the
>>>>>>>> same kernel source tree with exactly the same .config, just with two
>>>>>>>> different versions of gcc, correct?
>>>>>>> yes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If so, it is quite possible that the slow one is the correct one.  :-/
>>>>>>> yeah, new version always have problem.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> looks like opensuse11.3 has 4.5.0 and fedora14 has 4.5.1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OK, so fedora14 is the fast one (4.5.1) and opensuse11.3 is the slow
>>>>>> one (4.5.0), correct?
>>>>>
>>>>> And does commit c7a3786030 help?  This commit (from Peter Zijlstra)
>>>>> tidied up RCU kthreads' scheduler interactions.  The patch is below,
>>>>> though it is probably more convenient to pull it from the rcu/next
>>>>> branch of:
>>>>>
>>>>>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-2.6-rcu.git
>>>>>
>>>
> gcc in Fedora 14 is fine with your tree.
> 

sorry, I should wait for longer to see Fedora 14 is ok.

got same warning with the one compiled from fedora 14...

[  372.937251] INFO: task rcun0:8 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[  372.937618] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[  372.956130] rcun0           D 0000000000000000     0     8      2 0x00000000
[  372.956498]  ffff882070d65e90 0000000000000046 ffff882070d64000 0000000000004000
[  372.956528]  00000000001d1f40 ffff882070d65fd8 00000000001d1f40 ffff882070d65fd8
[  372.956555]  0000000000004000 00000000001d1f40 ffff882070d18000 ffff882070d6a2b0
[  372.956581] Call Trace:
[  372.956605]  [<ffffffff810afce3>] ? __lock_release+0x166/0x16f
[  372.956624]  [<ffffffff81c229d1>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3f/0x46
[  372.956639]  [<ffffffff810ce941>] ? rcu_cpu_kthread_should_stop+0x137/0x137
[  372.956650]  [<ffffffff810adfd5>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[  372.956661]  [<ffffffff810ce941>] ? rcu_cpu_kthread_should_stop+0x137/0x137
[  372.956673]  [<ffffffff8109a0a5>] kthread+0x8c/0xa8
[  372.956689]  [<ffffffff81c2a754>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[  372.956701]  [<ffffffff81c22c80>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe
[  372.956711]  [<ffffffff8109a019>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x5b/0x5b
[  372.956722]  [<ffffffff81c2a750>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb
[  372.956726] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[  492.750827] INFO: task rcun0:8 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[  492.751150] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[  492.762991] rcun0           D 0000000000000000     0     8      2 0x00000000
[  492.763264]  ffff882070d65e90 0000000000000046 ffff882070d64000 0000000000004000
[  492.763294]  00000000001d1f40 ffff882070d65fd8 00000000001d1f40 ffff882070d65fd8
[  492.763320]  0000000000004000 00000000001d1f40 ffff882070d18000 ffff882070d6a2b0
[  492.763346] Call Trace:
[  492.763359]  [<ffffffff810afce3>] ? __lock_release+0x166/0x16f
[  492.763371]  [<ffffffff81c229d1>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3f/0x46
[  492.763382]  [<ffffffff810ce941>] ? rcu_cpu_kthread_should_stop+0x137/0x137
[  492.763393]  [<ffffffff810adfd5>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[  492.763404]  [<ffffffff810ce941>] ? rcu_cpu_kthread_should_stop+0x137/0x137
[  492.763414]  [<ffffffff8109a0a5>] kthread+0x8c/0xa8
[  492.763427]  [<ffffffff81c2a754>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[  492.763439]  [<ffffffff81c22c80>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe
[  492.763449]  [<ffffffff8109a019>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x5b/0x5b
[  492.763460]  [<ffffffff81c2a750>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb
[  492.763463] INFO: lockdep is turned off.


if reverting PeterZ's patch will not have that warning.

Thanks

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-23 22:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <tip-80d02085d99039b3b7f3a73c8896226b0cb1ba07@git.kernel.org>
2011-05-20 21:04 ` [tip:core/rcu] Revert "rcu: Decrease memory-barrier usage based on semi-formal proof" Yinghai Lu
2011-05-20 22:42   ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-20 23:09     ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-20 23:14       ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-20 23:16         ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-20 23:49           ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-21  0:02             ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-21 13:18               ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-21 14:08                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-23 20:14                   ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-23 21:25                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-23 22:01                       ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-23 22:55                         ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-23 22:58                           ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2011-05-24  1:18                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-24  1:26                               ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-24  1:35                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-24 21:23                                   ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-25  0:05                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-25  0:13                                       ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-25  4:46                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-25  7:24                                           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-25 20:48                                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-25  7:18                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-25  0:16                                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-25  0:10                                     ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-25  4:52                                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-25  7:27                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-25 20:47                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-25 20:52                                             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-25 22:15                                         ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-25 22:34                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-25 22:49                                             ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-26  1:13                                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-26  1:30                                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-26  6:13                                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-26 14:25                                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-26 17:43                                                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-26 20:26                                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-26 15:08                                                   ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-26 16:28                                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-28  1:04                                                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-28  4:03                                                         ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-28  6:38                                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-24  1:12                         ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DDAE6A5.6060701@kernel.org \
    --to=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.