From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ARM Subarchitecture group maintainership
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 10:59:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110525075902.GH30799@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=xzrLhHTBynWf4huA9EusfaDwPbA@mail.gmail.com>
* Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> [110518 17:49]:
> Arnd,
>
> On 18 May 2011 09:47, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > This is the draft plan for maintaining the ARM subarchitectures in a common
> > tree, as a way to help coordinate the upstream merging of the
> > arch/arm/{plat,mach}-* changes into Linus' tree.
>
> For clarification - the aim of this subarchitecture group is not only
> to coordinate the upstream merging but also take an active (primary)
> role in consolidating the existing code across various
> subarchitectures under arch/arm/.
It's good to see organized effort on consolidating the code.
And Linaro is probably the best place to organize this effort.
Naturally I assume that you guys won't be merging any platform
specific patches without proper acks from the platform maintainers:
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Arnd, do you want to do a practise run with pulling in the omap
code and merging to Linus for this merge window?
Regards,
Tony
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC] ARM Subarchitecture group maintainership
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 10:59:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110525075902.GH30799@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=xzrLhHTBynWf4huA9EusfaDwPbA@mail.gmail.com>
* Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> [110518 17:49]:
> Arnd,
>
> On 18 May 2011 09:47, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > This is the draft plan for maintaining the ARM subarchitectures in a common
> > tree, as a way to help coordinate the upstream merging of the
> > arch/arm/{plat,mach}-* changes into Linus' tree.
>
> For clarification - the aim of this subarchitecture group is not only
> to coordinate the upstream merging but also take an active (primary)
> role in consolidating the existing code across various
> subarchitectures under arch/arm/.
It's good to see organized effort on consolidating the code.
And Linaro is probably the best place to organize this effort.
Naturally I assume that you guys won't be merging any platform
specific patches without proper acks from the platform maintainers:
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Arnd, do you want to do a practise run with pulling in the omap
code and merging to Linus for this merge window?
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-25 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-18 8:47 [RFC] ARM Subarchitecture group maintainership Arnd Bergmann
2011-05-18 8:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-05-18 14:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-05-18 14:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-05-25 7:59 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2011-05-25 7:59 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-05-25 14:28 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-05-25 14:28 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-05-25 15:34 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-05-25 15:34 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-05-25 16:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-25 16:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-26 8:28 ` Mark Brown
2011-05-26 8:28 ` Mark Brown
2011-05-26 8:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-26 8:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-26 9:59 ` Mark Brown
2011-05-26 9:59 ` Mark Brown
2011-05-26 10:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-05-26 10:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-05-18 15:22 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-18 15:22 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-18 15:27 ` Anca Emanuel
2011-05-18 15:27 ` Anca Emanuel
2011-05-19 12:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-05-19 12:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-05-18 15:56 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2011-05-18 15:56 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2011-05-18 21:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-18 21:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-18 21:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-05-18 21:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-05-18 20:49 ` David Brown
2011-05-18 20:49 ` David Brown
2011-05-19 1:27 ` Barry Song
2011-05-19 1:27 ` Barry Song
2011-05-19 2:42 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-05-19 2:42 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-05-19 3:01 ` Barry Song
2011-05-19 3:01 ` Barry Song
2011-05-19 13:31 ` Linus Walleij
2011-05-19 13:31 ` Linus Walleij
2011-05-19 19:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-19 19:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-19 19:31 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-05-19 19:31 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-05-19 13:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-05-19 13:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-05-19 14:23 ` Barry Song
2011-05-19 14:23 ` Barry Song
2011-05-19 15:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-05-19 15:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-05-24 9:23 ` Barry Song
2011-05-24 9:23 ` Barry Song
2011-05-24 12:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-05-24 12:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-05-27 5:34 ` viresh kumar
2011-05-27 5:34 ` viresh kumar
2011-05-27 7:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-05-27 7:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-05-19 12:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-05-19 12:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-05-19 3:38 ` viresh kumar
2011-05-19 3:38 ` viresh kumar
2011-05-20 20:48 ` Linus Walleij
2011-05-20 20:48 ` Linus Walleij
2011-05-20 20:59 ` Joe Perches
2011-05-20 20:59 ` Joe Perches
2011-05-21 8:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-05-21 8:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-05-25 8:10 ` Nicolas Ferre
2011-05-25 8:10 ` Nicolas Ferre
2011-05-25 8:23 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-05-25 8:23 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-05-25 16:19 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2011-05-25 16:19 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2011-05-26 16:14 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-26 16:14 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-27 0:01 ` Kyungmin Park
2011-05-27 0:01 ` Kyungmin Park
2011-07-26 18:03 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-07-26 18:03 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-07-27 1:47 ` Barry Song
2011-07-27 1:47 ` Barry Song
2011-07-27 2:23 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-07-27 2:23 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-07-27 14:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-07-27 14:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110525075902.GH30799@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.