* [PATCH] opensm/libvendor: Fix compile warnings on 64 bit machines when building --with-osmv=sim
@ 2011-06-02 19:03 Hal Rosenstock
[not found] ` <4DE7DE6A.9040100-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hal Rosenstock @ 2011-06-02 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Netes; +Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
osm_vendor_mlx.c: In function '__osmv_get_send_txn':
osm_vendor_mlx.c:708: warning: format '%llX' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'uint64_t'
osm_vendor_mlx.c:723: warning: format '%llX' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'uint64_t'
osm_vendor_mlx.c:733: warning: format '%llX' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'uint64_t'
osm_vendor_mlx.c:746: warning: format '%llX' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'uint64_t'
osm_vendor_mlx_hca_sim.c: In function '__parse_ca_info_file':
osm_vendor_mlx_hca_sim.c:268: warning: format '%016llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'uint64_t'
osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c: In function '__osmv_dispatch_route':
osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c:208: warning: format '%llX' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'uint64_t'
osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c:221: warning: format '%llX' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'uint64_t'
osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c: In function '__osmv_dispatch_simple_mad':
osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c:276: warning: format '%llX' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'long unsigned int'
osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c: In function '__osmv_dispatch_rmpp_mad':
osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c:331: warning: format '%llX' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'uint64_t'
osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c: In function '__osmv_dispatch_rmpp_rcv':
osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c:570: warning: format '%llX' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'uint64_t'
osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c:624: warning: format '%llX' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'uint64_t'
osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c:629: warning: format '%llX' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'long unsigned int'
osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c: In function '__osmv_dispatch_accept_seg':
osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c:661: warning: format '%llX' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'uint64_t'
osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c:674: warning: format '%llX' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'uint64_t'
osm_vendor_mlx_sender.c: In function '__osmv_rmpp_send_segment':
osm_vendor_mlx_sender.c:345: warning: format '%llX' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'ib_net64_t'
Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock <hal-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
---
diff --git a/libvendor/osm_vendor_mlx.c b/libvendor/osm_vendor_mlx.c
index 9ae59a9..7a40fa5 100644
--- a/libvendor/osm_vendor_mlx.c
+++ b/libvendor/osm_vendor_mlx.c
@@ -704,7 +704,7 @@ __osmv_get_send_txn(IN osm_bind_handle_t h_bind,
if (IB_SUCCESS != ret) {
osm_log(p_bo->p_vendor->p_log, OSM_LOG_ERROR,
"__osmv_get_send_txn: ERR 7313: "
- "The transaction id=0x%llX failed to init.\n",
+ "The transaction id=0x%" PRIx64 " failed to init.\n",
tid);
goto get_send_txn_done;
}
@@ -719,7 +719,7 @@ __osmv_get_send_txn(IN osm_bind_handle_t h_bind,
|| FALSE == osmv_txn_is_rmpp_init_by_peer(*pp_txn)) {
osm_log(p_bo->p_vendor->p_log, OSM_LOG_ERROR,
"__osmv_get_send_txn: ERR 7314: "
- "The transaction id=0x%llX is not unique. Send failed.\n",
+ "The transaction id=0x%" PRIx64 " is not unique. Send failed.\n",
tid);
ret = IB_INVALID_SETTING;
@@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ __osmv_get_send_txn(IN osm_bind_handle_t h_bind,
if (TRUE == resp_expected) {
osm_log(p_bo->p_vendor->p_log, OSM_LOG_ERROR,
"__osmv_get_send_txn: ERR 7315: "
- "The transaction id=%llX can't expect a response. Send failed.\n",
+ "The transaction id=0x%" PRIx64 " can't expect a response. Send failed.\n",
tid);
ret = IB_INVALID_PARAMETER;
@@ -742,7 +742,7 @@ __osmv_get_send_txn(IN osm_bind_handle_t h_bind,
if (IB_SUCCESS != ret) {
osm_log(p_bo->p_vendor->p_log, OSM_LOG_ERROR,
"__osmv_get_send_txn: ERR 7316: "
- "The transaction id=%llX failed to init the rmpp mad. Send failed.\n",
+ "The transaction id=0x%" PRIx64 " failed to init the rmpp mad. Send failed.\n",
tid);
osmv_txn_done(h_bind, tid, FALSE);
goto get_send_txn_done;
diff --git a/libvendor/osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c b/libvendor/osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c
index fa5fc1f..ba6c4e8 100644
--- a/libvendor/osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c
+++ b/libvendor/osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ __osmv_dispatch_route(IN osm_bind_handle_t h_bind,
if (FALSE == is_txn && TRUE == is_resp) {
osm_log(p_bo->p_vendor->p_log, OSM_LOG_DEBUG,
- "Received a response to a non-started/aged-out transaction (tid=0x%llX). "
+ "Received a response to a non-started/aged-out transaction (tid=0x%" PRIx64 "). "
"Dropping the MAD.\n", key);
return OSMV_ROUTE_DROP;
}
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ __osmv_dispatch_route(IN osm_bind_handle_t h_bind,
if (TRUE == is_txn && FALSE == is_resp) {
/* Does this MAD try to start a transaction with duplicate tid? */
osm_log(p_bo->p_vendor->p_log, OSM_LOG_DEBUG,
- "Duplicate TID 0x%llX received (not a response). "
+ "Duplicate TID 0x%" PRIx64 " received (not a response). "
"Dropping the MAD.\n", key);
return OSMV_ROUTE_DROP;
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ __osmv_dispatch_simple_mad(IN osm_bind_handle_t h_bind,
p_mad_buf->trans_id = cl_hton64(osmv_txn_get_tid(p_txn));
osm_log(p_bo->p_vendor->p_log, OSM_LOG_DEBUG,
- "Restoring the original TID to 0x%llX\n",
+ "Restoring the original TID to 0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
cl_ntoh64(p_mad_buf->trans_id));
/* Reply matched, transaction complete */
@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ __osmv_dispatch_rmpp_mad(IN osm_bind_handle_t h_bind,
is_init_by_peer = TRUE;
osm_log(p_bo->p_vendor->p_log, OSM_LOG_DEBUG,
- "A new sender-initiated transfer (TID=0x%llX) started\n",
+ "A new sender-initiated transfer (TID=0x%" PRIx64 ") started\n",
key);
}
@@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ __osmv_dispatch_rmpp_rcv(IN osm_bind_handle_t h_bind,
if (TRUE != is_last1) {
osm_log(p_bo->p_vendor->p_log, OSM_LOG_DEBUG,
- "RMPP MADW assembly continues, TID=0x%llX\n", tid);
+ "RMPP MADW assembly continues, TID=0x%" PRIx64 "\n", tid);
goto dispatch_rmpp_rcv_done;
}
@@ -620,12 +620,12 @@ __osmv_dispatch_rmpp_rcv(IN osm_bind_handle_t h_bind,
}
osm_log(p_bo->p_vendor->p_log, OSM_LOG_DEBUG,
- "RMPP MADW %p assembly complete, TID=0x%llX\n", p_new_madw,
+ "RMPP MADW %p assembly complete, TID=0x%" PRIx64 "\n", p_new_madw,
tid);
p_mad_buf->trans_id = cl_hton64(tid);
osm_log(p_bo->p_vendor->p_log, OSM_LOG_DEBUG,
- "Restoring the original TID to 0x%llX\n",
+ "Restoring the original TID to 0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
cl_ntoh64(p_mad_buf->trans_id));
/* Finally, do the job! */
@@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ __osmv_dispatch_accept_seg(IN osm_bind_handle_t h_bind,
if (seg_num != p_recv_ctx->expected_seg) {
osm_log(p_bo->p_vendor->p_log, OSM_LOG_DEBUG,
- "TID 0x%llX: can't accept this segment (%d) - "
+ "TID 0x%" PRIx64 ": can't accept this segment (%d) - "
"this is a Go-Back-N implementation\n", tid, seg_num);
return IB_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES;
}
@@ -671,7 +671,7 @@ __osmv_dispatch_accept_seg(IN osm_bind_handle_t h_bind,
}
osm_log(p_bo->p_vendor->p_log, OSM_LOG_DEBUG,
- "TID 0x%llX: segment %d accepted\n", tid, seg_num);
+ "TID 0x%" PRIx64 ": segment %d accepted\n", tid, seg_num);
p_recv_ctx->expected_seg = seg_num + 1;
OSM_LOG_EXIT(p_bo->p_vendor->p_log);
diff --git a/libvendor/osm_vendor_mlx_hca_sim.c b/libvendor/osm_vendor_mlx_hca_sim.c
index c5e2106..15df23e 100644
--- a/libvendor/osm_vendor_mlx_hca_sim.c
+++ b/libvendor/osm_vendor_mlx_hca_sim.c
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ __parse_ca_info_file(IN osm_vendor_t * const p_vend,
osm_log(p_vend->p_log, OSM_LOG_DEBUG,
"__parse_ca_info_file: "
- "CA1 = name:%s guid:0x%016llx ports:%d\n",
+ "CA1 = name:%s guid:0x%" PRIx64 " ports:%d\n",
sim_ca_info->name, sim_ca_info->guid, sim_ca_info->num_ports);
status = IB_SUCCESS;
diff --git a/libvendor/osm_vendor_mlx_sender.c b/libvendor/osm_vendor_mlx_sender.c
index fc1bf32..319a54e 100644
--- a/libvendor/osm_vendor_mlx_sender.c
+++ b/libvendor/osm_vendor_mlx_sender.c
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ __osmv_rmpp_send_segment(IN osm_bind_handle_t h_bind,
p_mad->trans_id = cl_hton64(key);
osm_log(p_bo->p_vendor->p_log, OSM_LOG_DEBUG,
- "Sending RMPP segment #%d, on-wire TID=0x%llX\n",
+ "Sending RMPP segment #%d, on-wire TID=0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
seg_num, p_mad->trans_id);
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] opensm/libvendor: Fix compile warnings on 64 bit machines when building --with-osmv=sim
[not found] ` <4DE7DE6A.9040100-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
@ 2011-06-03 10:48 ` Alex Netes
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Alex Netes @ 2011-06-03 10:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hal Rosenstock; +Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
On 15:03 Thu 02 Jun , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>
> osm_vendor_mlx.c: In function '__osmv_get_send_txn':
> osm_vendor_mlx.c:708: warning: format '%llX' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'uint64_t'
> osm_vendor_mlx.c:723: warning: format '%llX' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'uint64_t'
> osm_vendor_mlx.c:733: warning: format '%llX' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'uint64_t'
> osm_vendor_mlx.c:746: warning: format '%llX' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'uint64_t'
>
> osm_vendor_mlx_hca_sim.c: In function '__parse_ca_info_file':
> osm_vendor_mlx_hca_sim.c:268: warning: format '%016llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'uint64_t'
>
> osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c: In function '__osmv_dispatch_route':
> osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c:208: warning: format '%llX' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'uint64_t'
> osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c:221: warning: format '%llX' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'uint64_t'
> osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c: In function '__osmv_dispatch_simple_mad':
> osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c:276: warning: format '%llX' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'long unsigned int'
> osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c: In function '__osmv_dispatch_rmpp_mad':
> osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c:331: warning: format '%llX' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'uint64_t'
> osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c: In function '__osmv_dispatch_rmpp_rcv':
> osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c:570: warning: format '%llX' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'uint64_t'
> osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c:624: warning: format '%llX' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'uint64_t'
> osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c:629: warning: format '%llX' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'long unsigned int'
> osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c: In function '__osmv_dispatch_accept_seg':
> osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c:661: warning: format '%llX' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'uint64_t'
> osm_vendor_mlx_dispatcher.c:674: warning: format '%llX' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'uint64_t'
>
> osm_vendor_mlx_sender.c: In function '__osmv_rmpp_send_segment':
> osm_vendor_mlx_sender.c:345: warning: format '%llX' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'ib_net64_t'
>
> Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock <hal-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
> ---
Applied, thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-06-03 10:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-06-02 19:03 [PATCH] opensm/libvendor: Fix compile warnings on 64 bit machines when building --with-osmv=sim Hal Rosenstock
[not found] ` <4DE7DE6A.9040100-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-03 10:48 ` Alex Netes
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.