All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Henry Ptasinski <henryp@broadcom.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Brett Rudley <brudley@broadcom.com>,
	Roland Vossen <rvossen@broadcom.com>,
	"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (staging related)
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 13:19:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110609201907.GC12792@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110609195211.GG10107@broadcom.com>

On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 12:52:12PM -0700, Henry Ptasinski wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 11:41:27AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 05:27:45PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi Greg,
> > > 
> > > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig)
> > > failed like this:
> > > 
> > > drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/ampdu.c: In function 'wlc_ampdu_dotxstatus':
> > > drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/ampdu.c:840:17: error: invalid operands to binary ^ (have 'volatile u32 *' and 'int')
> > > drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/ampdu.c:840:17: error: invalid operands to binary ^ (have 'volatile u32 *' and 'int')
> > > drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/ampdu.c:848:8: error: invalid operands to binary ^ (have 'volatile u32 *' and 'int')
> > > drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/ampdu.c:848:8: error: invalid operands to binary ^ (have 'volatile u32 *' and 'int')
> > > drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/bmac.c: In function 'wlc_bmac_update_slot_timing':
> > > drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/bmac.c:186:3: error: invalid operands to binary ^ (have 'volatile u16 *' and 'int')
> > > drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/bmac.c:186:3: error: invalid operands to binary ^ (have 'volatile u16 *' and 'int')
> > > drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/bmac.c:190:3: error: invalid operands to binary ^ (have 'volatile u16 *' and 'int')
> > > drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/bmac.c:190:3: error: invalid operands to binary ^ (have 'volatile u16 *' and 'int')
> > > drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/bmac.c: In function 'wlc_setband_inact':
> > > drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/bmac.c:234:2: error: invalid operands to binary ^ (have 'volatile u32 *' and 'int')
> > > drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/bmac.c:234:2: error: invalid operands to binary ^ (have 'volatile u32 *' and 'int')
> > > drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/bmac.c: In function 'wlc_dpc':
> > > drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/bmac.c:311:6: error: invalid operands to binary ^ (have 'volatile u32 *' and 'int')
> > > 
> > > (and lots more)
> > 
> > Fun :(
> > 
> > This looks messy.  It's a macro that is trying to be cute by doing:
> > #define R_REG(r) \
> >         ({ \
> >                 __typeof(*(r)) __osl_v; \
> >                 __asm__ __volatile__("sync"); \
> >                 __osl_v = bcmsdh_reg_read(NULL, (unsigned long)(r),\
> >                                           sizeof(*(r))); \
> >                 __asm__ __volatile__("sync"); \
> >                 __osl_v; \
> >         })
> > 
> > on big-endian, non-mips platforms.  Which I really doubt has ever
> > been tested before.
> 
> I think it was used on PPC once upon a time, but likely in a very different
> incarnation.
> 
> > Roland, Brett, any thoughts?
> > 
> > Should I just disable this module from being build on PPC as it doesn't
> > look like its ever been tested or run on that platform before.
> 
> Disabling the build on PPC for now sounds ok.  We'll work on cleaning up the
> macros and try to get some more platform test coverage.

Ok, I've done that now and pushed it to the staging-next tree.

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-09 20:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-09  7:27 linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (staging related) Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-09 18:41 ` Greg KH
2011-06-09 19:22   ` Greg KH
2011-06-10  6:05     ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-10  6:09       ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-10 22:34         ` Greg KH
2011-06-15  4:21           ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-16 19:14             ` Greg KH
2011-06-23  0:35               ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-23 21:51                 ` Greg KH
2011-06-24  0:00                   ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-27 21:45                     ` Greg KH
2011-06-28  0:16                       ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-15 12:05       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-06-15 12:05         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-06-15 15:47         ` Greg KH
2011-06-15 15:47           ` linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (staging Greg KH
2011-06-15 14:35       ` [PATCH] arch/tile: remove useless set_fixmap_nocache() macro Chris Metcalf
2011-06-15 14:35       ` Chris Metcalf
2011-06-15 14:35         ` Chris Metcalf
2011-06-15 14:35         ` Chris Metcalf
2011-06-15 14:35         ` Chris Metcalf
2011-06-09 19:52   ` linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (staging related) Henry Ptasinski
2011-06-09 20:19     ` Greg KH [this message]
2012-06-12  4:54 linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related) Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-12  4:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-12 15:31 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-06-12 15:31   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-06-12 15:31   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-06-13  0:50   ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-13  0:50     ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-13 23:20     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-06-13 23:20       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-02-11  7:34 linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (acpi " Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-11  7:34 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-11 18:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-02-11 18:22   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-02-11 23:23 ` Len Brown
2013-02-11 23:23   ` Len Brown
2013-02-12 17:35   ` Sam Ravnborg
2013-02-12 17:35     ` Sam Ravnborg
2013-02-12 18:01     ` Should SPARC use cpuidle? (was: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (acpi tree related)) Len Brown
2013-02-12 18:01       ` Should SPARC use cpuidle? (was: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (acpi tree r Len Brown
2013-02-12 18:03       ` Should SPARC use cpuidle? Len Brown
2013-02-12 18:03         ` Len Brown
2013-02-12 19:36         ` Sam Ravnborg
2013-02-12 19:36           ` Sam Ravnborg
2013-02-12 19:42       ` Should SPARC use cpuidle? (was: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (acpi tree related)) Sam Ravnborg
2013-02-12 19:42         ` Should SPARC use cpuidle? (was: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (acpi tr Sam Ravnborg
2014-04-22  6:22 linux-next: build failure after merge of the audit tree Stephen Rothwell
2014-04-22  6:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-04-22 15:56 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-04-22 15:56   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-04-22 16:32 ` Eric Paris
2014-04-22 16:32   ` Eric Paris
2014-04-22 21:27   ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-04-22 21:27     ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-30  3:46 linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-30  3:46 ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110609201907.GC12792@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=brudley@broadcom.com \
    --cc=henryp@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rvossen@broadcom.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.